Tuesday, February 22, 2022

Video Report - #UKRAINE - Is Putin's latest move a prelude to a wider conflict? | Inside Story

Video Report - 'The language of war': Borger reacts to Biden's speech about Ukraine

Video Report - #Trump Called Putin’s Ukraine Strategy ‘Savvy’ and ‘Genius’

Video Report - President Biden Provides an Update on Russia and Ukraine - Feb 22, 2022

Video Report - #Ukraine #NATO #Russia Ukraine crisis: which sanctions are the EU and the US now imposing on Russia? Feb 22, 2022

Pashto Music Video - Sehrish Khan | Sada Janan

Video - Imran Khan's Russia Visit Despite Serious Reservations From Powerful Quarters

To Preserve Its Own Stability, Pakistan Must Stabilize Afghanistan First


 By Salman Masood and Zia ur-Rehman

Analysts say that the Taliban takeover has sparked a spike in terror attacks that have put the Pakistani government in a difficult position as it tries to support Afghanistan’s new government.
The euphoria felt by many in Pakistan over a Taliban victory in Kabul six months ago is subsiding. The government had hoped that a friendly — some would say proxy — regime in Kabul would ease its concerns about the Pakistani Taliban.
But instead, there has been a spike in terror attacks in recent months, which Pakistani officials say were planned by militants hiding inside Afghan territories.Still, senior Pakistani civil and security officials remain sanguine about the future, or, at the very least, stress that a stable Afghanistan is essential for a stable Pakistan. It’s a position that puts Pakistan in a tight corner: The country must continue to help the new Taliban government, while also contending with the growing security and economic risks to Pakistan that have come with the new regime.
“Is there a chance that if the Taliban government is squeezed, there could be a change for the better? No.” Prime Minister Imran Khan of Pakistan said in an interview with CNN earlier this month. He stressed that the world will also eventually have to deal with the Taliban for the lack of a second or better alternate.
“So the only alternative we have right now is to work with them and incentivize them for what the world wants: inclusive government, human rights and women’s rights in particular,” he added.
So far, however, the government’s efforts for the diplomatic recognition of the Afghan Taliban and calls for more global financial assistance have yielded few results. Pakistan itself not diplomatically recognizing the Afghan Taliban shows the dilemma the country faces.
Pakistan witnessed a 42 percent increase in terrorist attacks in 2021 compared to the previous year, according to the Islamabad-based Pak Institute of Peace Studies, with a significant surge after Kabul fell. The report noted that the fall of Kabul had started adversely influencing the country’s militant landscape and security, saying the change in Afghanistan is “not helping in any way Pakistan’s efforts to deal with the militant groups threatening its security.”
The institute documented that the Pakistani Taliban, or Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, a banned militant group responsible for some of the country’s worst terrorist attacks, alone was responsible for 87 attacks that killed 158 people, an increase of 84 percent relative to 2020.
Until late 2020, the Pakistani Taliban seemed considerably weakened, its top leadership killed or pushed into Afghanistan after a Pakistani military offensive in 2014. But alongside the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan, the insurgency has made a comeback, and is using its resurgence to instill fear in Pakistani traders, government officials and law enforcement.
Using telephone numbers starting with the Afghanistan international dialing code, the Pakistani Taliban have been calling and threatening affluent Pakistani traders to pay extortion money.
“Traders have been forced to pay huge amounts of extortion money because of fear,” Muhammad Azam, a Karachi-based trader, who says he paid around $2,850 last month to the terror outfit.“If a trader refuses to pay it, the militants detonate small bombs near their homes to frighten them into succumbing to their demands. If they continue to refuse payment, militants harm them or their family members,” Mr. Azam said.Such threats have also extended to senior government officials, many of whom say they pay because they fear being attacked at political rallies or during other public events — as has been the fate of senior political leaders in the past.
One senior federal government minister, hailing from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, said he recently paid a few million rupees to the Pakistani Taliban to avoid being attacked. Another official, who spoke to The Times on the condition of anonymity because of security fears, said when he refused to pay, a militant threatened him in person.
Police officers, particularly those protecting polio vaccinator teams, have been a key target of such attacks. In 2021, militants, mainly belonging to Pakistani Taliban, killed 48 policemen and injured 44 others in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province alone, according to police statistics. Much of the violence occurred in the last few months of the year.
Despite repeated attempts, Pakistan has been unable to get firm guarantees from the Afghan Taliban that they would take action against the Pakistani Taliban operating in Afghanistan. The worsening security situation was one of the top agenda items in talks between Taliban authorities and Moeed Yusuf, the Pakistani national security adviser, when he visited Kabul last month.
The Afghan Taliban are “committed to taking necessary steps to ensure that Afghan soil is not used for attacks against Pakistan,” Mr. Yusuf said in an interview with The New York Times, adding that Pakistan “will continue to extend humanitarian assistance to Afghanistan, and engage with the Taliban on matters of mutual interest and concern within the internationally permissible framework.” Analysts also note that Pakistan’s economy has been hurt by the situation across the border, as millions of American dollars are reportedly smuggled over the border per day. To mitigate this, the State Bank of Pakistan in October limited the amount of U.S. dollars travelers are allowed to take to Afghanistan.
One of the upsides for Pakistan of the collapse of the former Afghan government has been the damage it did to India’s second front against Pakistan, according to said Asif Durrani, a former Pakistani ambassador to Afghanistan and Iran.Pakistani officials had long accused India of supporting terrorism in Pakistan through Indian consulates inside Afghanistan, with the support of the former Afghan government’s intelligence agency. After the Taliban takeover, Pakistani officials say that the Indian footprint has been diminished, though they still blame India for funding the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and Baluch separatists groups. This has been particularly acute in southwestern Baluchistan, a natural gas and mineral-rich province and the site of major Chinese projects. On Jan. 27, the Pakistani military said 10 of its soldiers were killed in a firefight in the Kech district of Baluchistan Province. Less than a week later, more than a dozen suicide attackers, heavily armed with rocket launchers and sophisticated weapons, attacked two Pakistani paramilitary camps in the remote districts of Panjgur and Naushki along Pakistan’s southern border with Iran and western border with Afghanistan.
“The Baluch insurgents are also drawing strength from the Taliban’s example of defeating the United States, and the T.T.P. has been helping them with training and tactics for some time,” said Asfandyar Mir, a senior expert at the United States Institute of Peace, referring to the Pakistani Taliban. “With Afghanistan more permissive to the T.T.P., Afghanistan-based Baluch insurgents — despite losing the patronage of the former Afghan government — still have help in Afghanistan.” Senior security officials in Islamabad also say they are mindful of the capacity issues of the Afghan Taliban, who don’t have total control over all of their members. Some low-level Afghan Talibs, they say, maintain their links with the Pakistani Taliban, a fact recognized by the senior Afghan Taliban leadership who acknowledge their shortcomings and resolve to allay Pakistan’s concerns.
Some analysts, however, warn that Pakistan is overreaching in its optimism and hopes placed with the Afghan Taliban.
“The ideological convergence between the Afghan Taliban and the T.T.P. terrorist network is inescapable,” said Mosharraf Zaidi, an Islamabad-based policy and security analyst. “Combined with the allure to explicitly support Pashtun nationalism, this ideological convergence between Kabul and the T.T.P. terrorist network means that the Taliban are not aligned with Islamabad on two key security issues.”
Pakistan, Mr. Mosharraf said, now has largely the same Afghanistan on its border that it did before August 2021, when Kabul fell, but with one profound difference. “It no longer has a capable counterterrorism partner, à la the U.S. government, to work with.”
Other commentators second this assessment.
Ironically, Pakistan, which supported the Taliban against the United States and has been batting for the movement’s international recognition since August 2021, is the first country to charge that, under the new Taliban government, Afghan territory is being used for international terrorism, Mr. Mir said. Pakistan made the accusation after T.T.P. militants firing from inside Afghanistan killed five Pakistani soldiers at a border post in northwestern Kurram district on Feb. 6.
Mr. Mir added: “The hollowness of the Afghan Taliban’s counterterrorism guarantees has become apparent in their treatment of the Pakistani Taliban.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/22/world/asia/pakistan-afghanistan-taliban.html#commentsContainer

Pakistan Faces ‘Peace of Wolves’ as Regional Tensions Rise

By Lynne O’Donnell
After 20 years of supporting the Taliban in Afghanistan, Pakistan finds the tables are turning as militancy comes home.
Complex, simultaneous attacks on two regional Pakistan Army headquarters in remote Balochistan have focused attention on the capacity and audacity of homegrown militant groups emboldened and even enabled by the victory of the Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan.
The assault on the paramilitary headquarters in Panjgur lasted three days, and the one in Nushki a day, and coincided with Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan’s visit to Beijing for the Olympics opening ceremony and talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping. A senior Pakistani official, speaking anonymously, said 22 attackers and 13 soldiers were killed in the Feb. 2-5 attacks, which were claimed by Baloch separatists. Sources in Pakistan—including officials and diplomats who spoke on condition of anonymity—were alarmed by the sophistication and capability on display in the attacks. The Baloch Liberation Army had also claimed an attack a few weeks earlier.
The resurgence of domestic terrorism in Pakistan is a bitter, but not unexpected, harvest for Islamabad, which spent the last two decades supporting the Taliban in Afghanistan, only to see the latter’s eventual success boomerang and undermine Pakistan’s own security. Pakistan now accuses the Taliban in Afghanistan of harboring militant groups that seek the overthrow of the Pakistani state. Militant attacks have increased alarmingly since May 2021, coinciding with the Afghan Taliban’s ultimately victorious offensive, according to the Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies (PICSS). It noted the deadliest month for attacks in Pakistan was August, when the Afghan Taliban retook power in Kabul.
PICSS counted 294 attacks in Pakistan last year—a 56 percent rise over 2020—resulting in 395 deaths and more than 600 wounded. It said 104 of those attacks happened in Balochistan, with 103 in the restive tribal districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Both share borders with Afghanistan; Balochistan also borders Iran.
The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which has long had ties to the Afghan Taliban, was driven into Afghanistan’s eastern provinces from the North and South Waziristan tribal areas in Pakistan Army operations in 2014 and 2015. The United States Institute of Peace last year described the TTP as a “greatly diminished force but not a toothless one” and added that its “relationships with other militant groups—particularly the Afghan Taliban, al-Qaeda, and ISK [the Afghanistan chapter of the Islamic State]—have been critical in providing the group with material benefits, as well as legitimizing its ideology.”
And the fall of Afghanistan—once meant to provide Pakistan with “strategic depth”—has directly impacted Islamabad’s own security. The departure of U.S. and international forces and the collapse of the Afghan republic meant drone strikes and ground operations against the TTP in Afghanistan ceased in the middle of last year. The United Nations Security Council puts the number of TTP militants in Afghanistan at 3,000-5,000.
But Pakistan’s woes aren’t just due to the fall of the Afghan republic. Domestic militant threats are expected to intensify amid a toxic cocktail of economic deprivation, social marginalization, heavy-handed security, ethnic nationalism, and tribalism. Across the country, attacks are on the rise. Baloch and Pashtun nationalists are chafing against forced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and tight media controls. There’s also the perception that big Chinese investments, especially in Balochistan, under the guise of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor aren’t trickling down. The senior Pakistani official attributed the early February attacks in Balochistan to ire over China’s economic and financial stranglehold on Islamabad. “The aim was to downgrade the relationship with China,” the official said.
“In any other country, including my own, these attacks would be called civil war,” said a Western diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Things are getting worse, but will it explode? No, and for no other reason than that the military is there.” The Pakistan Army is entrenching its control over the civilian administration, courts, media, and civil society, justifying its actions with traditional anti-India rhetoric as well as the uptick in homegrown terrorism.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/22/pakistan-taliban-terrorism-militant-groups/

تحریک عدم اعتماد پر غور، شہباز شریف، آصف زرداری ملاقات کا مشترکہ اعلامیہ سامنے آگیا

 


اپوزیشن کی دو بڑی جماعتوں مسلم لیگ (ن) شہباز شریف اور پیپلز پارٹی کے آصف علی زرداری کی ملاقات کا مشترکہ اعلامیہ سامنے آگیا۔

بلاول ہاؤس لاہور میں ہونے والی اپوزیشن کی اہم سیاسی بیٹھک میں بلاول بھٹو زرداری، جے یو آئی (ف) کے اسعد محمود بھی موجود تھے۔

ملاقات کے اختتام پر طے پایا کہ آصف علی زرداری، شہباز شریف، مولانا فضل الرحمان اور بلاول بھٹو کل ایک بار پھر سیاسی بیٹھک لگائیں گے۔

مشترکہ اعلامیے کے مطابق اپوزیشن قیادت کی اگلی ملاقات میں اپوزیشن کی تینوں بڑی جماعتوں کی قیادت کل دوپہر شہباز شریف کی رہائش گاہ پر مل بیٹھے گی۔

اعلامیے کے مطابق آصف زرداری اور شہباز شریف کی ملاقات میں رہنماؤں نے حکومت کے خلاف تحریک عدم اعتماد کے حوالے سے اہم گفتگو کی۔

مشترکہ اعلامیے کے مطابق قائدین میں تحریک عدم اعتماد سے متعلق فیصلہ کن اقدام پر اہم مشاورت ہوئی۔

اعلامیے کے مطابق قائدین نے اتفاق کیا کہ مہنگائی کی آگ عوام کے گھر جلارہی ہے، حکومت کو گھر بھجوا کر عوام کو اس ظلم سے بچایا جاسکتا ہے۔

مشترکہ اعلامیے کے مطابق قائدین نے اتفاق کیا کہ عوام کی خواہشات پوری کرنے کے لیے تندہی سے کام کریں گے اور جلد رزلٹ دیں گے۔

اعلامیے کے مطابق اپوزیشن قیادت کی اس ملاقات میں فسطائیت اور آمریت کو پیکا ترمیمی قانون کا نام دیا گیا۔

مشترکہ اعلامیے کے مطابق قائدین نے اتفاق کیا کہ میڈیا اور اظہار رائے کی آزادیاں چھیننے والے حکمران سے اقتدار چھین لیں گے۔

اعلامیے کے مطابق ملاقات میں اپوزیشن قیادت نے ملک میں بڑھتی بے امنی اور لاقانونیت پر تشویش کا اظہار کیا۔

مشترکہ اعلامیے کے مطابق حکومت عوام کی جان ومال اوربنیادی ضروریات پوری کرنےمیں ناکام ہوچکی ہے۔

https://jang.com.pk/news/1053698