Monday, April 15, 2019
In its annual report, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) said the government has done little in the past to stop such forced marriages and asked the lawmakers to pass effective legislation to end the practice. Pakistan's independent human rights watchdog on Monday raised concerns about incidents of forced conversions and marriages of Hindu and Christian girls, saying around 1,000 such cases were reported just in the southern Sindh province alone last year. In its annual report, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) said the government has done little in the past to stop such forced marriages and asked the lawmakers to pass effective legislation to end the practice. "Around one thousand cases of Hindu and Christian girls were estimated in the province of Sindh alone in 2018. The cities where such cases occurred frequently included Umerkot, Tharparkar, Mirpurkhas, Badin, Karachi, Tando Allahyar, Kashmore and Ghotki," said the 335-page report titled ''State of Human Rights in 2018''. Stating that no authentic data is available on forced conversions and forced marriages in Pakistan, the report said that the Sindh Child Marriage Restraint Act 2013 has not been enforced effectively and the state's response to forced marriages has been mixed. "If not accomplices, police are insensitive and indifferent at best in most cases," the report said. It said that the "minorities continued to face harassment, arrest or even death for simply living their lives in accordance with their beliefs in Pakistan in 2018." The report came less than a week after the Islamabad High Court declared that the two Hindu teenage sisters - Raveena, 13, and Reena, 15, - were not forcibly converted from Hinduism to Islam, and permitted them to live with their spouses.The two Hindu girls were allegedly kidnapped by a group of "influential" men from their home in Ghotki district in Sindh on the eve of Holi. Soon after the kidnapping, a video went viral in which a cleric was purportedly shown soleminising the marriage of the two girls, triggering a nationwide outrage.The Hindu community members took out massive demonstrations seeking strict action against those responsible for forced conversion and marriages of Hindu girls. Prime Minister Imran Khan also ordered probe to ascertain if the two girls were abducted and forcibly converted and married. A five-member commission probed the matter and concluded that it was not a forced conversion. The counsel for the girls' parents, however, asserted that the case pertained to forced conversion. A Hindu lawmaker from Prime Minister Khan's party last month moved two bills in Parliament seeking enhancement of punishment for those involved in forced conversion and for making child marriage a cognisable offence. The bills were accompanied by a resolution with the support of minority lawmakers from all major political parties condemning such incidents. The five-point resolution called for immediate passage of the bill against forced conversions, which had been unanimously passed by the Sindh Assembly in 2016 and then reverted due to pressure of extremist elements, from all the legislatures. Hindus form the biggest minority community in Pakistan. According to official estimates, 75 lakh Hindus live in Pakistan. Majority of Pakistan's Hindu population is settled in Sindh province.
By Mehmal Sarfraz
His speech last week, calling for strong action against all terror outfits, had resulted in a war of words. “The government has responded to my demand to sack Ministers associated with banned outfits by declaring me anti-state, issuing death threats & NAB notices. None of this deters us from our principle[d] stand; form joint NSC parliamentary committee & act against banned outfits,” tweeted Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari, chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), on Tuesday. Last week, Mr. Bhutto-Zardari had demanded the removal of three federal Ministers for their links with proscribed organisations. He had not named the three Ministers but everyone had guessed their names — Finance Minister Asad Umar, Minister of State for Interior Shehryar Afridi and Railways Minister Sheikh Rasheed Ahmad. In a series of tweets on Monday, Mr. Bhutto-Zardari confirmed these names by tweeting out news stories of these three Ministers hobnobbing with leaders of banned outfits. On March 16, Mr. Rasheed tweeted: Log kehte hain Bilawal bacha hai, Bilawal agar bach kar khelay toh acha hai warna siyaasat mein maara jaayega (People say that Bilawal is a child. If he plays cautiously, it will be good, otherwise he can die in politics — or die politically.) The PPP construed this tweet as a serious death threat as it believed that Mr. Rasheed has links with banned outfits. A united front There has been a war of words ever since the PPP chairman delivered a hard-hitting speech in the National Assembly on March 6. He appreciated the Opposition for showing a united front to the world after the Indian aggression post-Pulwama. He said: “There was no petty politicking… none of the Opposition members dared to declare Imran Khan a security risk for trying to make peace overtures to India.” Mr. Bhutto-Zardari also poked fun at the resolution to nominate Mr. Khan for the Nobel Peace Prize. After that, he spoke resolutely about terrorism. “We don’t need to fight terrorism, extremism, banned organisations because the world wants us to, because we are under international pressure, because we are under India’s pressure. As the Pakistan Peoples Party has been saying from the outset when most members of this House were in denial about the threats of extremism and terrorism, we have to combat this mindset for the future of our coming generation.” He questioned the state about the implementation of the National Action Plan (NAP). “What happened to ‘no more good or bad Taliban’? What happened to action against Punjab’s Taliban? What happened to action against banned organisations? What happened to judicial reform? What happened to combating terrorist financing and terror-related money laundering? And what the hell is mainstreaming? How is it possible that this House takes a unanimous decision and the state implements a diametrically contradictory policy of capitulation, appeasement and so-called mainstreaming? This is not the policy of the Parliament of Pakistan and this should not be the policy of Pakistan!” Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi answered some of the Mr. Bhutto-Zardari’s questions but Finance Minister Umar made sexist remarks in his speech, mocking Mr. Bhutto-Zardari for using ‘Bhutto’ in his name, instead of just ‘Zardari’. Two days later, Mr. Khan also used the same kind of remarks against Mr. Bhutto-Zardari. Some experts believe that the harsh — but factual — criticism of the state’s policies has irked the government. “If this is how the PTI government wants to respond to facts, then how will it prove to the international community that it is serious in taking substantive action against banned organisations?,” asked PPP spokesperson Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar. He added that Prime Minister Khan himself has said on several occasions that he will not allow militant organisations to operate from Pakistani soil. Why, then, was his government being so defensive when the links of his Cabinet Ministers are pointed out, he asked? “We lost our leader Benazir Bhutto to terrorism. The PPP leadership is still taking a hard stand on terrorists despite security risks. The government must also show how sincere and serious they are when it comes to fighting terrorism and taking action against militant outfits,” he said. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/bilawals-tweet-calls-for-removal-of-3-pak-ministers/article26583631.ece