M WAQAR..... "A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary.Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." --Albert Einstein !!! NEWS,ARTICLES,EDITORIALS,MUSIC... Ze chi pe mayeen yum da agha pukhtunistan de.....(Liberal,Progressive,Secular World.)''Secularism is not against religion; it is the message of humanity.'' تل ده وی پثتونستآن
Wednesday, May 21, 2014
Maid to Pay: Exploiting Asia's Domestic Workers
By Angelina Draper
Although physical abuse dominates headlines, it is not the only issue domestic workers encounter.“Everybody’s nice if you didn’t borrow money yet, but if it’s time for them to collect, they are rude,” says 30-year old Celine Barung* from the Philippines. Like thousands of other maids, years after her arrival, Barung is still repaying debts tied to the placement fees charged by the agency that first recruited her for work in Hong Kong. The recent case of Erwiana Sulistyaningsih, who was allegedly assaulted by her Hong Kong employer, brought media attention to the physical abuse suffered by some domestic workers, but many others, like Barung, suffer an injustice not often spoken about: financial abuse. The anti-slave charity Liberty Asia has announced that it is building a database that will gather complaints logged against abusive recruitment agencies and moneylenders in Hong Kong and across Southeast Asia. The goal is to have a single, searchable database capable of identifying patterns of abuse and frequent offenders. The online nature of the database will allow charities, lawyers, and other interested parties to access the data regardless of their location. Funding comes from a $3 million Google-sponsored Global Impact Award given to Hong Kong-based Liberty Asia and two other organizations. According to Google’s website, the award “support[s] ideas that use technology to address some of the world’s biggest challenges.” Financial exploitation is most often inflicted by recruitment agencies that withhold jobs until they receive large sums of money labeled “placement fees” or “agency commissions.” Helpers who cannot afford to pay are pressured into borrowing money from friends and family. Those for whom this is not an option are frequently introduced to moneylenders. When Barung decided to seek employment as a domestic helper outside her native country, she had to turn to a specialist recruitment agency. “I got an employer in a short time,” she says. “The agency was saying, ‘Provide it [the money] now, so that you can go now.’” Not having money for the placement fee, she felt pressured into accepting their advice to borrow money. The agency persuaded her that the number of Hong Kong employers was limited and that she should not miss this opportunity. Charging for recruitment services is not illegal, but the placement fees demanded of domestic workers are often disproportionate to the salaries they earn. In an effort to stop agencies taking advantage of migrant workers, some countries have set fee caps or abolished them altogether – as is the case in the Philippines. Charities and NGOs, however, claim that the practice of charging fees is still very common. Prosecuting rogue agencies and moneylenders has proven difficult, mainly due to lack of evidence, paper trails and the international nature of the transactions. “Recruitment agencies in [domestic helpers’] home countries, like Indonesia, collude with the placement agencies in Hong Kong and the loan companies,” says Tom Grundy, Hong Kong-based activist and founder of HK Helpers Campaign. “They basically entrap helpers in debt. Which makes it much harder for them (the workers) to escape abusive situations.” Charities and NGOs dealing with helper-related issues typically collect complaints on paper forms, which given a lack of resources are rarely digitized. This has made it difficult to connect one complaint with another or identify agencies that are repeatedly reported. This is where Liberty Asia’s database comes into play. “We are providing the data, and they [Liberty Asia] are helping us compile our data,” says Holly Allan, manager of the Hong Kong-based charity Helpers for Domestic Helpers. Without a database that gathers and compares information, Allan says, it has been difficult to prepare the types of reports and statistics needed to go after “the most notorious actors and most frequent offenders.” In Hong Kong, more than 300,000 foreign domestic workers (FDWs) are employed to assist with domestic duties and the care of children and the elderly. The minimum monthly wage for domestic helpers is HK$4,010 ($529) and the eligibility requirements for employers are very basic (HK$15,000 monthly household income – or asset equivalent – and Hong Kong residency). For many families, employing a domestic helper is a necessity rather than a luxury due to limited childcare facilities. Catering to this demand are specialist recruitment agencies in Hong Kong that collaborate with partner agencies in the helpers’ home countries, primarily the Philippines and Indonesia, which account for 97 percent of all FDWs. The Hong Kong government is aware of accusations made against recruitment agencies and has taken some steps to improve the situation, such as capping placement fees at 10 percent of the first month’s salary. According to Allan, however, more needs to be done. “There is a lack of solid or serious action from the government to address the issue,” she says. Hong Kong labor laws also work against domestic workers. FDW’s must leave the territory within two weeks of terminating a contract. This time pressure gives recruitment agencies the upper hand: it allows them, according to Allan, to charge placement fees for new jobs as high as HK$21,000. Helpers fearing they will not secure a new employer within the 14-day grace period often feel that they have no choice but to go through an agency. Some abusive lenders will probably never make it into the database. One such moneylender is Angie: the matriarchal Philippine helper who lent Barung money when a family emergency demanded that she return home unexpectedly. After the terms of the loan had been agreed, Barung says they did not document the transaction. And typical of an illegal moneylender, Angie’s friendly demeanor vanished once the loan was made. When Barung tried to make small payments, Angie become difficult to find. “She would say that if you have money, then pay it back, but when I want[ed] to pay her, she didn’t want that.” Physically unable to pay her lender, Barung watched helplessly as the debt kept growing. Remembering sleepless nights, as well as the fear and shame associated with being in debt, Barung says: “There is much regret. There is anger inside. If I did not borrow money, things could have been different.” A database will not solve all the problems associated with financial abuse, but it is a step in the right direction. (* Not her real name.) Angelina Draper is a multimedia journalist based in Hong Kong.
U.S. deploys 80 troops to Chad to help find kidnapped Nigerian schoolgirls

Youth killed in Bahrain clashes

At least one person dies in fighting during a ceremony to mark the death of a Shia killed in an explosion last week.A youth in Bahrain has died in clashes with police at a Shia village near the capital Manama, according to the country's main Shia opposition bloc, al-Wefaq.

A sorry saga: Why an apology won’t erase legacy of Canada’s racist tax on Chinese

Iranian 'Happy' Dancers Released from Jail
http://www.voanews.com/Police in Tehran have released six Iranians who were arrested for posting a dance video featuring American singer Pharrell Williams's hit song "Happy" on the Internet. Reyhaneh Taravati, one of the Iranian women arrested posted a message on Instagram Wednesday to announce the news. Taravati, "reihanet" on instagram, posted a photo of herself and thanked the singer and all others for their support "Hi I'm back. thank you @pharrell and everyone who cared about us love you all so much and missed you so much," she wrote in English. In a post to Twitter, the International Campaign for Human Rights quoted a source close to the families of the dancers saying that all people who made the video were released, except for the director." The controversial video clip that prompted the arrest shows three men and three unveiled women singing and dancing to the song on rooftops and in the streets. Speaking Tuesday, Tehran's police chief called the dance video a "vulgar clip which hurt public chastity." Islamic law enforced in Iran requires women to cover themselves from head to toe. "Police decided to identify those involved in making that clip," Tehran police chief Hossein Sajedinia was quoted as saying by the ISNA news agency, in a report by the French news agency AFP. The police chief added it took authorities just hours to identify and arrest the six dancers, who were shown on state television after their arrests as a warning to other youths. The video was uploaded in April. The original clip has been removed from the Internet, but copies are still available. The song, featured in the animated movie “Despicable Me 2,” has sparked similar videos of people dancing down streets and smiling in choreographed crowds all over the world. Those arrested said on the TV broadcast that they were deceived and that the video was not meant to be posted online, the AP reported. “They had told us that this video won't be released anywhere and that it was for our own joy,'' one of the women said. Another detainee said: "They invited us to appear on the video to practice acting.” It wasn't immediately clear if the six arrested faced criminal or civil charges or had lawyers, AP reported. The arrests come as hard-liners increasingly challenge moderate President Hassan Rouhani, the AP reported. Rouhani campaigned for greater cultural and social freedoms during the presidential election last year and spoke last week about the Internet. “We should see the cyberworld as an opportunity,'' said Rouhani, according to the official IRNA news agency and reported by the AP. "Why are we so shaky? Why don't we trust our youth?” Hard-liners accuse the president of failing to take the necessary actions to stop the spread of the "decadent'' Western culture in Iran. After learning of the arrest, singer Williams tweeted with his @Pharrell Twitter handle Wednesday that it is "beyond sad" the six were arrested for "trying to spread happiness."
Teen survivor of Boko Haram attack meets U.S. lawmakers
Deborah Peters, a 15-year-old Nigerian girl who survived a 2011 attack by Boko Haram, tells members of the U.S. Congress that the militants killed her father that night for refusing to renounce his Christian faith.
China, Russia ink long-awaited gas deal

Six Iranians arrested for making fan video of Pharrell Williams' 'Happy'

"#Happiness is our people's right. We shouldn't be too hard on behaviors caused by joy," the post read in what appears to be a restatement of a Rouhani comment from 2013, based on a date accompanying the tweet.
Pharrell denounced the arrests."It is beyond sad that these kids were arrested for trying to spread happiness," the Grammy Award winner said on his Facebook page. Just like in the singer's original video, the Iranian fan version features a montage of men and women dancing to the song in a variety of settings. Reihane Taravati, a woman who said she helped make the fan project, gushed over the reaction to the video in the days before the Tuesday arrests. "178K VIEWS thank you," she wrote on her Facebook page last week. She also posted a picture of people featured in the video on Instagram. "People of Tehran are happy! Watch and Share Our Happiness!," Taravati wrote. "Let the world hear us! we are happy and we deserve to be!" Taravati's last Facebook post came Sunday. The arrests come amid growing support on Facebook for an unrelated project featuring photographs submitted by women who appear without the country's legally required head scarves. The page, created May 3, now has 331,000 likes. "This is the voice of Iranian women who have been censored all their lives in Iran," said London-based journalist Masih Alinejad, who created the page, told HLN, CNN's sister network. "And now social media is giving them the opportunity to speak out, to be themselves." Conversely, Iranian officials and some journalists denounced an Iranian actress who extended her hand in greeting to a film festival executive and received a kiss on the cheek from him, according to media reports. The BBC reported that a conservative journalism organization run by Iran's state broadcaster said actress Leila Hatami engaged in "unconventional and improper" behavior by extending her hand to Cannes Film Festival president Gilles Jacob. For his part, Jacob dismissed the controversy over kissing Hatami on the cheek. He said on Twitter that she represented "all Iranian cinema" and called the uproar over the kiss needless controversy "over a usual custom in the West." 'Happy' makes Pharrell cry International backlash Pharrell's not the only one unhappy about the arrests. The Twitter hashtag #FreeHappyIranians has gone viral. "Is happiness a crime? @Pharrell #freehappyiranians," @MaedehHP tweeted. Others poked fun at the fan video's message. "They deserve it for lying:) How can any body be #happy in #Tehran or #Iran for that matter," @Alothman123 wrote. The National Iranian American Council condemned Iranian authorities for arresting the six men and women and forcing them to repent on state TV. "There are forces within Iran's government who want to keep the Iranian people isolated from the world," the council said in a statement. "The irony that the Iranian youth were arrested for dancing to a song called 'Happy' seems to be lost on the Iranian authorities." Incidentally, the arrests came just days after Rouhani said citizens should take advantage of the Internet to communicate. "#Cyberspace should be seen as opportunity: facilitating two-way communication, increasing efficiency & creating jobs," the President tweeted Saturday. "Govt unhappy w/ current situation; working to increase internet speed for users at home, in offices& on mobiles." Rouhani said every Iranian citizen has a right to connect to the Internet, according to the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency. Some on social media made a point to separate the Iranian government from everyday Iranians. "In a country which Religion and politics are not separated anything could become a crime even happiness," Hamoun Dowlatshah posted on Pharrell's Facebook page. "I love you Iran but i hate your government more than anything else."
President Obama on VA Misconduct: 'I Will Not Tolerate It'
President Barack Obama on Wednesday vowed to get to the bottom of alleged misconduct at Veterans Affairs agency hospitals, calling the reported activity "dishonorable" and "disgraceful" but expressing confidence that VA Secretary Eric Shinseki will continue working with the administration to solve the problem "at this stage."
"If these allegations prove to be true, it is dishonorable, it is disgraceful and I will not tolerate it, period," he said in remarks at the White House.
Obama made the statement after meeting with Shinseki and top White House aide Rob Nabors, whom Obama has tapped to help fix the department’s problems.
Several high-profile lawmakers have called for Shinseki’s ouster over the matter, but Obama said that the secretary has been "a great public servant" for veterans and for the country.
But, he warned: "I want to see what the results of these reports are and there is going to be accountability."
"I know that Ric's attitude is that if does not think he can do a good job on this, and if he thinks he's let our veterans down, then I'm sure he is not going to be interested in continuing to serve," he said of Shinseki. "At this stage, Ric is committed to solving the problem and working with us to do it."
The president also highlighted the administration's efforts to reduce homelessness and unemployment among veterans, as well as a push to slash the VA backlog.
His comments were the first on the VA facility controversy since he addressed the issue on April 28.
The White House is facing an increasing outcry over allegations that VA hospital employees tampered with data and built hidden waiting lists to obscure the long delays veterans faced when needing care.
Nabors is headed to Phoenix this week to meet with officials at the VA facility where reports of the misconduct first surfaced earlier this month. Obama’s chief of staff, Denis McDonough, is also set to meet with Senate Veterans Affairs Committee chairman Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Lawmakers are expected to vote soon on a bipartisan bill that would enable easier dismissal of VA officials.
Critics say that the Obama administration has acted too slowly to address the scandal, which has made headlines nationwide and exacerbated frustration about a VA system that has long been characterized as dysfunctional and out of date.
Obama said Wednesday that his administration has been focused on veterans issues since long before the scandal broke, saying that "taking care of veterans of their families has been one of the causes of my presidency."
Xi Jinping Meets with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan
http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/
On May 19, 2014, President Xi Jinping met with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan in Shanghai.

Afghanistan: Jamil Karzai endorses Abdullah in second round of election


Pakistan must not jump the gun

Pakistan Supreme Court Reinstates Najam Sethi as Pakistan Cricket Board Chairman

Pakistan’s Tyranny of Blasphemy
By ALI SETHI
“I used to feel my life was too straight, too linear.”The speaker was Junaid Hafeez, a young poet and Fulbright scholar from the south of Pakistan, telling a radio show host in 2011 why he had given up studying medicine for a life in literature. Today, he is in jail on a blasphemy charge that carries the death penalty, and is mourning the lawyer who was murdered earlier this month for defending him. Before his arrest, Hafeez was teaching in the English Department at Bahauddin Zakariya University in Multan, a city in Punjab Province close to where he grew up. His personal charisma and liberal views had won him a following among students, as well as the envious attention of faculty members. One day in 2013, a student affiliated with Islami Jamiat Talaba, a wing of the hard-line Jamaat-i-Islami party, accused Hafeez of insulting the Prophet Muhammad on Facebook. The student had no evidence, but no evidence was needed. Hard-line students soon held a protest crying out for Hafeez’s execution. University administrators backed away. The police registered a case for blasphemy against Hafeez. They did not ask cybercrime specialists to investigate the accusation, relying instead on a fatwa issued by a seminary. For months Hafeez’s father tried to find a lawyer. Finally he petitioned Rashid Rehman, the 53-year-old special coordinator for the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan in Multan. A legal expert with 20 years of activism, Rehman was known as a go-to lawyer for hopeless causes. Despite the danger, he agreed to take Hafeez’s case. Defending a man accused of blasphemy, Rehman told a reporter in April, was like “walking into the jaws of death.” Those jaws have been open wide since the 1980s, when the military dictator Gen. Muhammad Zia ul-Haq updated a set of colonial laws that criminalized “insulting the religion of any class of persons.” The original laws were devised in the late 19th century by a paternalistic British government trying to keep its multifaith subjects from fighting one another. Those laws were worded generally, and prescribed fines and, at most, two-year prison terms. General Zia’s amendments particularized the insults and tailored the provisions to favor a stringent Sunni strain of Islam. They criminalized the desecration of the Quran, any defiling of the name of the Prophet Muhammad, and disrespectful remarks about his companions — a jab at Pakistan’s Shiite minorities, who dispute the outcome of the succession struggle that followed the Prophet’s death. Moreover, any attempt by members of the outlawed Ahmadi sect to refer to themselves as Muslims was criminalized. Punishments were upgraded: Blasphemers could be executed or jailed for life. General Zia died in an air crash in 1988, but his legacy remains. It includes the empowerment of theological figures in every stratum of life — from clerics and televangelists to fanatical academics and Shariah judges — all aided in their righteous endeavors by a legislature that remains intractably Zia-ist. The blasphemy laws are part of this package. For decades they had been rarely used, with only a handful of cases before the mid-1980s. But General Zia’s amendments opened the floodgates: More than a thousand cases have been reported since then, according to the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. Just last week the Punjabi police, prompted by a Sunni extremist, brought blasphemy charges against 68 lawyers. The blasphemy laws can serve just about anyone with a dark design — an angry relative, an envious colleague, a neighbor with his eye on your property. But the greatest beneficiary has been the professional Islamists, who specialize in their application to encroach on both state and society. I got a sense of this in August 2009 when I visited the torched Christian neighborhood of Gojra, a small city in the heart of Pakistan. A Muslim peasant had spread a rumor that Christian neighbors had desecrated a Quran, and it degenerated into a riot after clerics riled up Muslims with hysterical broadcasts from the loudspeakers of mosques. When the police tried to stop the mullahs, they quoted the blasphemy laws and threatened to turn the mob against the authorities for “protecting the blasphemers.” Some 60 Christian houses were set on fire and eight Christians killed. The Islamists would have us think that all believers are susceptible to spontaneous eruptions of violence when their religion is offended. But the reality, as documented by a government report on the Gojra incident, is more treacherous and tragic. A blasphemy charge, once taken up by a religious activist, can legitimate myriad other interests, from petty personal needs to large political plans, and create an exhilarating free-for-all atmosphere. The Gojra rioters included the constituents of the local opposition politician, peasants and day-laborers from neighboring areas who joined in the looting and armed members of the now-banned Sunni militant group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. Pakistan’s Islamist groups have little incentive to reform the blasphemy laws. They have even expanded the understanding of blasphemy so that it now includes any criticism of the laws themselves. This has been achieved by targeting high-profile dissenters, like Salmaan Taseer, a governor of Punjab province, and Shahbaz Bhatti, a federal minister for minorities, who were both assassinated in 2011. And then, just two weeks ago, there was the murder of Rashid Rehman. They closed in on him as mafias do, from all sides. First there were encoded warnings in Urdu newspapers, describing a lawyer who was out to “hurt himself.” Then there was a press conference in Multan at which a group of stern-faced clerics accused Rehman of trying to make an international issue of the Hafeez case. In April, during Hafeez’s trial, three lawyers for the prosecution told Rehman in front of the judge that by the next hearing he “would not exist.” Rehman’s colleagues at the human rights commission urged the government to provide him with security. They got no help. The ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz party has a history of placating extremist groups, like the Pakistani Taliban, to gain political mileage. On the night of May 7, two young men walked into Rehman’s office near the district courts in Multan, shot him dead in front of his colleagues, and fled into the night. The next morning, almost every newspaper in Pakistan described them as “unidentified individuals.” But what killed Rehman can be identified: It was violent zealotry, aided and abetted by the state.
Pakistan: Forceful Conversion to Islam: Rising Fear in Minorities


Pakistan: 2013 saw further deterioration of the Human Rights of Pakistan's Ahmadi Muslims
Ahmadiyya Times
The government of Pakistan which claims to uphold freedom of speech brought cases against Ahmadiyya publications such as Misbah and Alfazl - Pakistan’s oldest daily Urdu newspaper , exclusively meant for Ahmadis.Spokesman of Ahmadiyya Jamaat in Pakistan, Mr Saleem Ud Din, issued the annual report of persecution of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat for the year 2013. He said that the hatred and persecution against Ahmadis increased in the past year. Seven Ahmadis including three from the same family in Karachi, were killed sequentially merely on account of religious differences. Acts of persecution against the Ahmadiyya Jamaat are at their peak while the law enforcement agencies pander to the whims of the aggressors. Whether it is the desecration of Ahmadiyya mosques or the devastation of graves, the authorities align themselves with extremists rather than enact the law. Saleemuddin said that the government has close dealings with extremists under the cover of discriminative legislation against the Ahmadiyya Jamaat. He said that the discriminative laws of 1984 go against the fundamental principles of human rights, the law of Pakistan and the philosophy of the nation presented by Quaid e Azam. These laws should be dissolved and the human rights of Ahmadis ought to be upheld. According to the spokesman, Ahmadies have faced political, social and legal discrimination since he promulgation of the notorious ordinance of 1984 which is contrary to the basic and equal rights of citizenship. He said that 237 Ahmadis have been killed since the Ordinance was passed while 193 attempted murders have taken place. 27 mosques have been demolished, 31 have been sealed by the authorities and 16 others have been illegally appropriated. 37 bodies exhumed after burial while burial of 61 dead bodies of Ahmadis were denied in common cemetry. Not only are the lives of Ahmadis are under constant threat they are afforded no peace in death either. He said that with the assistance of the police opponents continued to efface Kalimas from Ahmadiyya mosques while Quranic verses were also removed from some houses. Similarly, various illegal operations were conducted, which were beyond the jurisdiction of the authorities. He said that a curtailment of the lawlessness in the country should be the top priority of law enforcement agencies, yet sadly it seems that they would rather spend their time harassing Ahmadies. Provocative literature, promoting the social and financial boycott as well as the murder of Ahmadies, is being distributed widely in the country, especially in Punjab and Sindh. Government silence on these issues suggests that these heinous acts have official backing. The Ahmadiyya spokesman said that the religious freedom and human rights of Ahmadies were constantly impinged on over the course of the year. Ahmadies were even prevented from offering Eid prayer in Rawalpindi. Likewise other Ahmadiyya mosques in the country were also targeted by opponents. The government of Pakistan which claims to uphold freedom of speech brought cases against Ahmadiyya publications such as Misbah and Alfazl - Pakistan’s oldest daily Urdu newspaper , exclusively meant for Ahmadis. According to the spokesman, Ahmadis were not allowed to hold any religious gatherings, or sports event in Rabwah, where 95% of the population is Ahmadi. Whereas the opponents were free to hold gatherings consisting of participants from outside Rabwah. Numerous Anti-Ahmadiyya organizations held such conventions in which they used abusive language against distinguished Ahmadies and publicly incited people to murder Ahmadis. No action was taken against them by the authorities. The spokesman referring to injustices against Ahmadis in the field of education said that in the 1970’s the government nationalized educational institutes including Ahmadiyya ones. After this a policy was implemented to reprivatize these institutes, the community submitted a significant payment to retake control of their schools and colleges. However this was not ratified by the government from fear of reprisal. How long will such discrimination continue for? The spokesman said that today sectarianism, violence and disorder is at its peak. It is necessary to figure out and understand that the current situation originates from the time when the government began to intrude in religious matters and enacted discriminative laws. It is time to eradicate all such legislation. Those Pakistani’s who possess a sense of justice ought to insist that the government of Pakistan devise effective measures to eradicate sectarianism and bias so that our beloved Pakistan can tread the path of success and prosperity. Press Release highlights: Seven Ahmadies killed and 16 further murders attempted for nothing more than religious differences Ahmadies deprived of the vote on account of discriminative election lists Due to pressure from extremists, Ahmadis prosecuted under discriminative laws Provocative literature, promoting the social and financial boycott as well as the murder of Ahmadis, widely distributed. Government silence suggest official patronage of these heinous acts Neither mosques nor the cemeteries are free from the oppression of so called ulema and the representatives of government According to the government’s policy regarding privatization, Ahmadiyya Jamaat has failed to retrieve its nationalized educational institutes. How long will the government impinge on the rights of Ahmadies from fear of opposition parties During 2013, an increase in fabricated news stories published in the Urdu press. More than 1700 news reports and more than 394 articles appeared during the year depicting Ahmadis in a negative light
Pakistan: Confusion reigns after polio guidelines
Pakistan has seen a rush on vaccines and angry scenes at hospitals after new World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines aimed at halting the crippling disease caused widespread confusion.
The WHO declared a public health emergency at the start of May after new polio cases began surfacing and spreading across borders from countries including Pakistan. The disease remains endemic in Pakistan, which is responsible for 80 per cent of polio cases diagnosed around the world this year.
The WHO advised Pakistani authorities to ensure all nationals and long-term residents planning to travel abroad were vaccinated. But the government's response has led to a rush on vaccines, confusion about certification and even angry scenes in hospitals.
All this on the eve of the peak summer travelling season, when tens of thousands of Pakistanis go to see relatives or celebrate weddings in countries with large diasporas populations, such as Britain. Observers say that since the WHO had been holding extensive discussions with the government of Pakistan prior to the recommendations, authorities should have been better prepared for what was coming their way.
In a government paediatric clinic in Islamabad with walls decorated by posters of Minnie Mouse and Winnie the Pooh, an ugly scene breaks out as families line up to receive polio drops. Staff asks latecomers to return the next day, prompting some who are due to travel the same night to start hectoring the unit's director who gives them short shrift.
"It's not our job to give you the polio vaccine, our job is to look after sick children who arrive at the hospital" the doctor, Tabish Hazir, cried. "We are doing this only because of the confusion at this stage," he tells AFP, still angry. "The government wasn't ready; it hadn't anticipated that the WHO would recommend restrictions. It arrived suddenly like a bomb."
Pakistan has undertaken countless UN-backed campaigns in recent years to try to stamp out polio. But these efforts have been met with hostility in parts of the northwestern tribal areas, where Taliban warlords have banned vaccination as a Western spying plot. Vaccination teams have come under attack, with more than 50 health workers and police escorts killed in attacks in the past year and a half.
The US this week pledged that its intelligence agencies would foreswear the tactic due to the fallout. On top of this, long-standing unfounded rumors about the vaccine causing infertility or containing pig products also persist. As a result, polio continues, mainly in the tribal areas along the Afghan border and the southern metropolis of Karachi.
Pakistan saw 91 cases last year, up from 58 in 2012, and has recorded 59 of the world's 74 cases already this year. Polio traced back to Pakistan has been found in Afghanistan and Syria and the new campaign of vaccination is aimed not at eradicating the disease from Pakistan but at stopping its spread beyond its borders. The government has said that anyone who has been in Pakistan longer than four weeks must be vaccinated before going abroad, even if they have been inoculated in the past.
The WHO guidelines said travelers should ideally receive the vaccine between four weeks and 12 months before travel. It is a difficult task in a country where immunized children rarely receive certificates and rampant corruption means there is a risk unvaccinated people could simply bribe officials to get the paperwork. Mahwish and Bilal Khan, a young couple in the capital, were forced to revaccinate their family and complained the government has been sending out contradictory messages.
"People thought that they will get these drops at the airport as we exit the country, then we have been told to get it here (at hospital), then we heard it has to be four weeks before we travel, then there are these exceptions for emergencies, so yes it is confusing," said Mahwish. Even though polio mainly affects young children, the WHO has called on authorities to also immunise adults leaving the country.
This is because adults can carry the virus without developing symptoms, said Keith Feldon, field coordinator of the WHO anti-polio campaign in Pakistan. The public clinics selected by the government to vaccinate travelers are drowning in work, while private doctors are doing a brisk trade with diplomats, journalists and other expats. The government has now called on the army to go with health workers in the tribal areas and vaccinate anyone trying to leave.
For Pakistanis preparing to fly to the UAE, Canada and Britain, confusion lingers.
Pakistan: What will we define as blasphemy next?
Imagine taking an allegedly blasphemous whisper, noticed by very few, and shouting it from the rooftop in the name of alerting the townsfolk of the misdeed.
Would you not consider the screamer to have caused more disrespect than the whisperer himself, by ensuring that the blasphemy spreads far wider than the whisperer had intended?
There are, after all, reasons why the accuser is not made to repeat the actual derogatory remarks in court, let alone re-broadcast them for the entire world to hear.
An accuser may however disregard this rule if the accusation is borne not of personal outrage for the alleged blasphemy, but a desire to rile up the crowds, take revenge, settle a personal score, while simultaneously being cheered on as a hero.
This is where the media war stands today.
We have seen TV anchor Mubashar Lucman condemn Geo for airing what he claims is a blasphemous video. The video features Veena Malik seated together with her husband Asad in what appears to be a wedding.
The occasion depicts wedding rituals of the recently married couple with background score as a qawwali that ostensibly, and perhaps offensively, compares this couple with a revered religious one.
What Lucman fails to take note of is the fact that ‘Ali keh saath’, a qawwali popularised by Amjab Sabri, is a common recitation at Shia weddings particularly in the rural areas.
This is due to the qawwali’s general matrimonial theme, and not because it’s intended to compare the bride and groom to personalities of religious significance. Geo neither composed the qawwali, nor invented the tradition of using it in weddings.
This point should be easy for warring media houses to understand, given that old videos have surfaced on the internet of multiple channels airing similar instances with the same qawwali.
That said, it is understandable that those who are not accustomed to the tradition may be offended, and it was prudent of Geo to apologise given the prevailing environment.
Unfortunately, this accusation sets a dangerous new precedent.
Will our ever-expanding definition of blasphemy now includes the long-held cultural practices of minority Islamic sects and other religious groups, or at least their sub-cultures?
Is it the majority sect that will have the authority to set 'objective' rules as to what constitutes sacrilege or not?
My fear is that eventually some channel will broadcast a segment of the annual Christmas pageant – a usual nativity scene with a member of the Christian community dressed as Mother Mary – and a competing media group will launch a campaign against the channel (as well as the participants of the play) for offending Muslims’ religious sensibilities.
The fallout from this would be deadly, and far wider than that of a simple media war - Amjad Sabri could probably testify to this.
It is now becoming eerily clear that there is nothing our television channels will not do to hurt each other in the name of higher ratings or personal vendetta; even if it means converting viewers by exploiting their religious sensibilities and our nation’s general state of volatility on the subject.
Pakistan: Posting a serving military officer as DG means placing the interests of landowner in the hands of the land user
http://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Senator Farhatullah Babar on Tuesday drew house’s attention towards what he said resentment among civilian officers of the military lands department and demanded that the cadre post of Director General of the department should be given back to the civilian officers after the retirement of the incumbent serving general this week. Speaking on a calling attention notice against what he said the appointment of a serving military officer against the slot, he said the continued retention of a civilian cadre post by serving military officers is illegal. “It’s a violation of the Supreme Court’s June 2013 order; a recipe to demoralise and undermine civilian structures and above all a conflict of interests that will bring a bad name to the military institution,” he added. Babar stated that director general military lands is supposed to watch the interests of the owner of land namely the federal government whereas the military is the user of the land. Posting a serving military officer as DG means placing the interests of landowner in the hands of the land user, he said, adding it is the worst form of conflict of interests that raises many questions. He said that DG is a BS 21 civilian cadre post of the ML&C department and appointments to it are made by the Public Service Commission through CSS exams. The post has been held by civilian officer since 1924 until General Pervez Musharraf took over who appointed a serving military officer in 1999, he added. He said the Supreme Court has also declared illegal the absorption of a non-civil servant on a civil post and the absorption of a non-cadre civil servant to a cadre post without due process of competitive examination under the recruitment rules. Babar said that in July last year when the defence ministry moved a summary for the appointment of yet another serving army officer to the post of DG the Prime Minister reluctantly agreed on the condition that in future the post would stand reverted to the civilian cadre. In order to countermand the orders of the then PM and to continue the illagility, he added, it is planned to give extension in service to the incumbent on his retirement due this week. He said that huge irregularities have been committed in changing the use of defence lands for commercial purposes. “When the previous parliaments agitated the issue the defence ministry secured from the caretaker Prime Minister in 2007 an unprecedented and questionable blanket waiver of all such irregularities,” he claimed. However, minister for defence production Rana Tanveer said the incumbent DG MLC was appointed for a two-year tenure and there will be no such appointment after his term is completed.
Pakistani Airstrikes Kill Nearly 30 Militants
Pakistani military jet fighters and helicopter gunships bombed several militant hideouts in a northwestern tribal region near the Afghan border on Wednesday, killing nearly 30 militants, Pakistani officials said.
The morning airstrikes in the lawless North Waziristan mainly targeted the town of Mir Ali, a military officer and two intelligence officials told The Associated Press. They spoke on condition of anonymity in line with regulations.
Several local residents, who mostly spoke anonymously for fear for their own safety, said the strikes also killed several civilians in a nearby village.
One resident, who identified himself as Saeedullah Khan, said the army had also been using artillery fire since early morning.
"We heard big bangs," he said. "I saw some houses flattened."
The claims could not be independently verified. The lawless tribal area is off limits to foreign journalist and the Pakistani army didn't release any statement confirming the strikes or the death toll.
Waziristan is part of Pakistan's tribal region, which is home to local and al-Qaida-linked foreign militants who have been waging a bloody war against the state, killing thousands of people.
The Pakistani Taliban seek to impose their own harsh brand of Islamic Shariah law and have been running a terror campaign in a bid to overthrow the government in Pakistan.
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has been pursuing a policy of negotiation with the Taliban to end the decades of militant violence, but government efforts have not yielded any results so far.
Wednesday's bombing in North Waziristan came a day after police confirmed that a Chinese tourist had been abducted in the area.
Abdullah Bahar, a militant commander, claimed responsibility for the abduction and said that his Shehryar Mehsud group, which operates under the Pakistani Taliban, would use the Chinese tourist to try to secure the release of their comrades in Pakistani custody. It was not clear, however, if the abduction was sanctioned by the central command of the Pakistani Taliban.
Also on Wednesday, a bomb rigged to a motorcycle exploded outside an office belonging to the Pakistani paramilitary forces in the southern city of Karachi, wounding seven civilian, said police official Javed Odho.
Bid to take Pakistan's Geo TV off the air fails
Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority disowns decision by its own members to suspend Geo TV's licensesAn attempt to take Pakistan's largest and most influential television station off the air descended into farce on Tuesday after the country's broadcasting regulator disowned a decision taken by some of its own board members. Three members of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) horrified journalist rights activists on Tuesday when they held a press conference declaring the organisation had suspended three licenses from Geo TV. But hours later Pemra itself said the organisation "disowns" the decisions taken by the three men. It said their discussions during the day "had no legal standing" because only three members of the 12 person board were present. Although Geo has in recent weeks been dropped by many cable television operators the channel continued to air its nightly news programmes as normal on Tuesday. The channel's troubles began when it aired explosive allegations that the country's top spy agency, the Inter Services Intelligence directorate (ISI) had attempted to kill star Geo journalist Hamid Mir as he was driving through Karachi in April. The company has been at the heart of a roiling controversy that has engulfed the country's media and political class ever since. The allegations against the intelligence agency were incendiary as few dare to publicly cross the ISI, an institution long regarded as among the most powerful in the country. The military responded by formally demanding Pemra revoke Geo's license for waging a "vicious campaign" aimed at "undermining the integrity and tarnishing the image of state institution". Pemra said it was still working on the complaint, which it had referred to the law ministry for a legal opinion. Geo's situation had become more perilous however after enduring relentless attacks from several other quarters. Commercial rivals, keen to cut into Geo's dominant market position, have vigorously attacked the company on their television channels and in newspapers owned by other media conglomerates. Former cricketer turned politician Imran Khan has also gone after Geo, accusing it of working to rig last year's election in favour of the governing faction of the Pakistan Muslim League led by prime minister Nawaz Sharif. But last week the situation became far more perilous after religious hardliners accused the station of broadcasting blasphemous material – an especially serious charge in a country where religious inflamed sentiments can quickly lead to violence. In the years since it was established in 2002 Geo has become a major power broker in Pakistan, commanding vast audience attracted by its lurid tabloid style. Media watchers say it had angered the country's powerful army by its vigorous campaign for peace and trade with India as well as aggressive criticism by Mir and other journalists of the army's human rights abuses. Geo executives insist they will not give up. In 2007 the channel was closed by former military ruler Pervez Musharraf. It responded by staging its popular television talk shows on the streets of Karachi, a stunt that proved wildly popular and helped cement its reputation for doggedness.
Ballooning Pakistan blasphemy charges engulf television stations

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)