
M WAQAR..... "A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary.Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." --Albert Einstein !!! NEWS,ARTICLES,EDITORIALS,MUSIC... Ze chi pe mayeen yum da agha pukhtunistan de.....(Liberal,Progressive,Secular World.)''Secularism is not against religion; it is the message of humanity.'' تل ده وی پثتونستآن
Monday, August 12, 2013
Special Report: In Bahrain, a U.S. prisoner's dilemma

Saudi Arabia supports terrorism in Middle East: Analyst
A political commentator says Saudi Arabia plays an active role in funding and supporting terrorism and extremism against democratic countries in the Middle East, Press TV reports.
Middle East expert from London Zeid al-Isa told Press TV’s Debate program that the formal religious establishment of Saudi Arabia as the staunchest ally of the United States adheres to the Wahhabi-Salafi ideology which is “the most regressive, the most violent and the most backward ideology.”
“The Wahhabi-Salafi ideology gives religious legitimacy, religious incentive and religious justification to the atrocities and also to the suicide bombings which are taking place both in Iraq and in Syria,” he stated.
In response to a question about the reasons behind recent violent attacks against Shia Muslims in Iraq, Isa noted that the country has been the scene of the worst bloodshed during July and the holy month of Ramadan.
“It is reminiscent of the days of 2006 and 2007 bloodshed where Iraq was driven close to the brink of a civil war,” he said.
“What is also undeniable is that since 2003 the Saudi regime has refused to recognize the democratic change in Iraq. It has also refused to have any diplomatic representation,” the commentator stated.
He reaffirmed the “undeniable” fact that Saudi Arabia has been the staunchest, closest and irreplaceable ally for the United States in the Middle East after the popular uprisings swept into the region.
Saudi Arabia is the main strategic US ally, which is the central pillar of executing American policies, he concluded.
Iraq has been struggling with a major surge of terror bombings and other violence since the beginning of this year. Over 670 people have been killed in the holy month of Ramadan alone.
The United Nations said on August 1 that a total of 1,057 Iraqis were killed and another 2,326 were wounded in acts of terrorism and violence in the month of July, making it the country’s deadliest month since 2008.
Saudi prince defects: 'Brutality, oppression as govt scared of Arab revolts'


“There is no independent judiciary, as both police and the prosecutor’s office are accountable to the Interior Ministry. This ministry’s officials investigate ‘crimes’ (they call them crimes), related to freedom of speech. So they fabricate evidence, don’t allow people to have attorneys”, the prince told RT Arabic. “Even if a court rules to release such a ‘criminal’, the Ministry of Interior keeps him in prison, even though there is a court order to release him. There have even been killings! Killings! And as for the external opposition, Saudi intelligence forces find these people abroad! There is no safety inside or outside the country.”The strong wave of oppression is in response to the anti-government forces having grown ever more active. A new opposition group called Saudi Million and claiming independence from any political party was founded in late July. The Saudi youths which mostly constitute the movement say they demand the release of political prisoners and vow to hold regular demonstrations, announcing their dates and locations via Facebook and electronic newspapers. Human rights violations are driving people on to the streets despite the fear of arrest, according to activist Hala Al-Dosari, who spoke to RT from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. “We have issues related to political and civil rights, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. These are the main issues that cause a lot of people to be at risk for just voicing out their opinions or trying to form associations, demonstrate or protest, which is banned by the government.” The loudest voice of the Saudi opposition at the moment is a person called ‘Saudi Assange’. His Twitter name is @Mujtahidd, he keeps his identity and whereabouts secret and is prolific in online criticism of the ruling family, which has gained him over a million followers.
“The regime can destroy your credibility easily and deter people from dealing with you if your identity is public,” Mujtahid wrote to RT’s Lindsay France in an email.The Twitter activist’s anonymity is understandable. The most recent example of what can happen to activists is the case of Raif Badawi, the founder of the Free Saudi Liberals website, who was found guilty of insulting Islam through his online forum and sentenced the activist to 600 lashes and seven years in prison. In June, seven people were sentenced to up to 10 years in prison for ‘inciting protests’ via Facebook. The indicted denied charges and said they were tortured into confession. “The government is obviously scared of the Arab revolutions. And they’ve responded as they usually do: by resorting to oppression, violence, arbitrary law, and arrest,” Prince Khaled says, adding that so far the tougher the measures the government took to suppress the dissent, the louder that dissent’s voice was. “The opposition used to demand wider people’s representation in governing bodies, more rights and freedoms. But the authorities reacted with violence and persecution, instead of a dialogue. So the opposition raised the bar. It demanded constitutional monarchy, similar to what they have in the UK, for example. And the Saudi regime responded with more violence. So now the bar is even higher. Now the opposition wants this regime gone.” There was a time, at the beginning of the Arab Spring movement in the region in 2011, when the government tried to appease opposition activists by a $60 billion handout program by King Abdullah, according to Pepe Escobar, a correspondent for the Asia Times. He calls that move an attempt to “bribe” the population. However there was also a stick with this carrot. “The stick is against the Shiite minority - roughly 10 percent of Saudi Arabia - who live in the Eastern province where most of the oil is, by the way. They don’t want to bring down the House of Saud essentially. They want more participation, judiciary not answering to religious powers and basically more democratic freedoms. This is not going to happen in Saudi Arabia. Period. Nor in the other Gulf Cooperation Council [GCC] petro-monarchies”. Escobar points out the hypocrisy of the Saudi Arabian rulers, who feel free to advise other regional powers on how to move towards democracy, despite their poor human rights record. “They say to the Americans that they are intervening in Syria for a more democratic post-Assad Syria and inside Saudi Arabia it’s the Sunni-Shiite divide. They go against 10 percent of their own population.”'Buying favors from West' Saudi Arabia’s crackdown on opposition has been strongly condemned by human rights organizations, but not by Western governments, which usually claim sensitivity to such issues. “The White House certainly does maintain a long-standing alliance with the leaders of Saudi Arabia, cemented by common political, economic and military interests in the Middle East,” said Prince Khaled. Germany came under fierce criticism last week over its arms sales to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, which have almost tripled in just two years, from 570 million euro in 2011 to almost one-and-a-half billion in 2012. And Angela Merkel's government has approved weapons exports of more than 800 million euro in the first half of this year - suggesting the level will continue to grow. “With arms they [Gulf States] are also buying favors from the West. They are insuring the maintenance of their legitimacy on spending massive amounts of money that are pouring into Western economies,” Dr. Ahmed Badawi, co-executive director of Transform, which studies conflicts and political developments, told RT. In 2012, Amnesty International claimed that German-made small firearms, ammunition and military vehicles were commonly used by Middle Eastern and North African regimes to suppress peaceful demonstrations. “Small arms are becoming real weapons of mass destruction in the world now. There is absolutely no way to guarantee that the weapons that are being sold legally to countries like Saudi Arabia, even Egypt, do not fall into the hands of terrorists. The two important examples are German assault rifles found in the regions in Mexico and also in Libya. And there’s absolutely no way of knowing how these weapons ended up there,” Badawi said.
Turkey: Ruling AKP deputy report criticizes government handling of Gezi crisis

Prime Minister Erdoğan was ‘misled’ about the Gezi Park protests, according to a report prepared by a research center chaired by a ruling party MPTurkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was misinformed during the Gezi Park protests and the redevelopment project was not handled in a democratic way, said a report prepared by the Eurasia Global Research Center (AGAM), chaired by İdris Bal, a Justice and Development Party (AKP) deputy. The report, called “Taksim Incidents Analysis,” said a small-scale local issue turned into a big crisis and chaos since the prime minister was misguided and became the principal side of the dispute. Bal’s report defined the unrest’s beginning as a “strategic mistake.” The Gezi Park protests started May 31 when the Metropolitan Municipality bulldozers attempted to demolish central Istanbul’s unique green area, Gezi Park. The Turkish police’s heavy-handed intervention caused the protests to spread to 79 of 81 provinces. Four protesters were killed by police and some “anti-protest civilians,” and a police officer fell off a bridge during an intervention and died. More than 10 protesters have lost their sight, and nearly 7,000 protesters were injured in almost 40 days of unrest, according to the Turkish Medical Association’s toll. This could have been avoided by early interventions by the local Beyoğlu Municipality or Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, and Erdoğan would be the actor to resolve the conflict. The report said the Taksim incidents started with the environmentalist sensitivity of a small group, but the police’s intervention and the lack of dialogue caused the protests to transform to anger at first the prime minister and second at the government. Dialogue required The project should have consulted the community, the report also said, adding that democracy-valuing societies require polls and dialogue between people and the local authorities. A chain of serious problems is seen in the process of the Gezi Park redevelopment project, the report said. Failing to place the prime minister in the crisis properly caused Erdoğan to become the principal side of the crisis, the report said. This was a strategic mistake that gave the opportunity to illegal groups waiting in ambush to benefit from chaos, it said. The report also criticized “ballot box democracy,” saying that winning elections did not mean that governments assumed omnipotent powers and claimed “the luxury to act as they desired until the next election.” Erdoğan reacted as if he had been the conductor of the project and the Beyoğlu local municipality and the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality were not considered sides in the project by society. Erdoğan was seen as the first responsible actor, the AKP second, the government third and the state fourth, the report said. If democratic methods had been implemented by the municipality from the beginning, the problems would not have even surfaced, it added. Bal, speaking to daily Radikal, said the question of where the mistake was made should be asked by every side, so that similar mistakes could be avoided.
War veterans: talks still best way to peace with Pakistan
Why 'Stop and Frisk' Was Ruled Unconstitutional
A U.S. District Court judge has ruled that New York's controversial practice of "stop and frisk" is unconstitutional, on grounds that it unfairly singles out racial groups.
The policy allows police officers to stop, question, and possibly search a person if the officer has suspicions that person has or may commit a crime. The policy was invoked 4.4 million times between 2004 and 2012, according to the judge's ruling. And it has been effective. The Atlantic recently reported that "in 2011, 770 guns were recovered across New York during frisks. That amounts to a 30 percent increase over 2003, when 594 guns were recovered."
But here's what has raised eyebrows, and prompted the litigation: In that 2004-2012 time frame, 80 percent of those stopped in New York City were black or Hispanic. In 2010, blacks and Hispanics made up about 50 percent of the city's population.
U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin put it in no unclear terms as to why the program should be reevaluated. Regardless of how well the policy works, she wrote in an opinion Monday, it violates constitutional protections. The decision, in all, is 195 pages long, but the following passage sums up the sentiment:
It is important to recognize the human toll of unconstitutional stops. While it is true that any one stop is a limited intrusion in duration and deprivation of liberty, each stop is also a demeaning and humiliating experience. No one should live in fear of being stopped whenever he leaves his home to go about the activities of daily life. Those who are routinely subjected to stops are overwhelmingly people of color, and they are justifiably troubled to be singled out when many of them have done nothing to attract the unwanted attention. Some plaintiffs testified that stops make them feel unwelcome in some parts of the city, and distrustful of the police. This alienation cannot be good for the police, the community, or its leader. Fostering trust and confidence between the police and the community would be an improvement for everyone.
In July, New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly took to the Wall Street Journal op-ed pages to defend the program, pointing to how murders are down 29 percent over last year, which had the lowest rates in half a century. He called the racial-profiling charges against the police force "disingenuous," citing how the reduction in crime has the greatest positive impact on minority communities.
But Scheindlin didn't care that the program was effective. After all, she reasoned, it would be a lot easier to capture criminals if police routinely resorted to illegal means.
I emphasize at the outset, as I have throughout the litigation, that this case is not about the effectiveness of stop and frisk in deterring or combating crime. This Court's mandate is solely to judge the constitutionality of police behavior, not its effectiveness as a law-enforcement tool. Many police practices may be useful for fighting crime—preventative detention or coerced confessions, for example—but because they are unconstitutional they cannot be used, no matter how effective.
Along with the ruling came some "remedies" for what ails stop and frisk. Scheindlin ordered a pilot program for officers to wear cameras to monitor their interactions with others, and community meetings centered around reforms.
NYC stop-and-frisk policy violates constitutional rights, federal judge rules
A federal judge ruled that the New York City Police Department's controversial stop-and-frisk policy violates individuals' constitutional rights because it intentionally discriminates based on race -- a significant judicial rebuke for what the mayor and police commissioner have defended as a life-saving, crime-fighting tool. Instead of ordering an end to the practice, however, U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin opted to reform it. She did not give many specifics on how that would work but instead named an independent monitor who would develop reforms to policies, training, supervision, monitoring and discipline. She also ordered that officers test out body-worn cameras in the police precinct where most stops occurred. "The city's highest officials have turned a blind eye to the evidence that officers are conducting stops in a racially discriminatory manner," she wrote. "In their zeal to defend a policy that they believe to be effective, they have willfully ignored overwhelming proof that the policy of targeting `the right people' is racially discriminatory." For years, police brass had been warned that officers were violating rights, but they nevertheless maintained and escalated "policies and practices that predictably resulted in even more widespread Fourth Amendment violations," Scheindlin wrote in a lengthy opinion. She also cited violations of the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. "Far too many people in New York City have been deprived of this basic freedom far too often," she said. "The NYPD's practice of making stops that lack individualized reasonable suspicion has been so pervasive and persistent as to become not only a part of the NYPD's standard operating procedure, but a fact of daily life in some New York City neighborhoods." Four men sued the department in 2004, saying they were unfairly targeted because of they were minorities. Scheindlin issued her ruling after a 10-week bench trial, which included testimony from NYPD brass and a dozen people — 11 men and one woman — who said they were wrongly stopped because of their race. She found that nine of the 19 stops discussed at the trial were unconstitutional, and an additional five stops included wrongful frisking. Stop and frisk is a constitutional police tactic, but Scheindlin concluded that the plaintiffs had "readily established that the NYPD implements its policies regarding stop and frisk in a manner that intentionally discriminates based on race." There have been about 5 million stops during the past decade, mostly black and Hispanic men. The judge said she determined at least 200,000 stops were made without reasonable suspicion, the necessary legal benchmark, lower than the standard of probable cause needed to justify an arrest. The class-action lawsuit was the largest and most broad legal action against the policy at the nation's biggest police department, and it may have an effect on how other police departments make street stops, legal experts said. Lawmakers have also sought to create an independent monitor and make it easier for people to sue the department if they feel their civil rights were violated. Those bills are awaiting an override vote after the mayor vetoed the legislation. The court monitor would examine stop and frisk specifically and could compel changes. The inspector general envisioned in the legislation would look at other issues but could only make recommendations. The city had no immediate response to the ruling, but officials planned an early afternoon news conference to discuss it. City lawyers had argued the department does a good job policing itself with an internal affairs bureau, a civilian complaint board and quality assurance divisions. The judge rejected their arguments. "The city and its highest officials believe that blacks and Hispanics should be stopped at the same rate as their proportion of the local criminal suspect population," she wrote. "But this reasoning is flawed because the stopped population is overwhelmingly innocent — not criminal." Scheindlin appointed Peter L. Zimroth, the city's former lead attorney and previously a chief assistant district attorney, as the monitor. In both roles, Zimroth worked closely with the NYPD, the judge said. He did not respond to a call seeking comment. The Center for Constitutional Rights, the nonprofit group that represented the plaintiffs, said in a statement: "Today is a victory for all New Yorkers. After more than 5 million stops conducted under the current administration, hundreds of thousands of them illegal and discriminatory, the NYPD has finally been held accountable. It is time for the city to stop denying the problem and work with the community to fix it."http://www.cbsnews.com/
President Obama begins Martha’s Vineyard vacation with a round of golf
Prison Escape: The Great Escape alarms the world
http://www.egyptindependent.com/The escapes of Al-Qaeda members from the Al-Kuwayfia prison in Libya, the Abu Ghraib and Al-Tagi prisons in Iraq, and another Pakistani prison have alarmed the world. Last week, prisoners escaped in nine different countries, which raised speculations as to whether it was a coincidence. CIA investigations say this was a new strategy for Al-Qaeda, which has actually claimed responsibility. President Barack Obama closed 25 diplomatic missions following an interception of a call between Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri and the leader of the Yemen branch Nasser al-Wahishi, in which Zawahiri ordered operations against U.S. and Western installations to be more violent than those of 11 September 2001. On 27 July, more than 1200 prisoners escaped in Libya as gunmen opened fire from outside the prison and clashed with the guards, while the prisoners burned the facility from the inside. Two days later in northwest Pakistan, militants blew up the gates of a prison, letting 250 prisoners out, of which many were Islamist militants. Twelve people were killed in the attack, including five police officers. In the same week, two Iraqi prisons were attacked by suicide bombers, and more than 500 prisoners escaped, including a number of senior Al-Qaeda members. The Interpol warned security authorities in all countries of the world of the potential consequences of these jailbreaks. On Saturday, US diplomatic missions opened again after closing for a week in Abu Dhabi, Amman, Cairo, Riyadh, Dhahran, Jeddah, Doha, Dubai, Kuwait, Bahrain, Muscat, Sanaa, Tripoli, Antananarivo, Bujumbura, Djibouti, Khartoum,Kigali, and Port Louis. US allies, including Britain, France, Germany and Norway, followed suit and closed a number of their diplomatic missions as well. US reports view this development as failure on the part of the US to help these countries achieve security and stability, and to combat Al-Qaeda activity. Experts found a pattern for the jailbreaks, namely suicide bombers, gunmen targeting prison walls, and the use of mortars and RPGs. Other common denominators are that all those countries have weak ruling institutions and security and intelligence bodies despite US support in this regard.
Afghanistan: ''Deteriorating security situation''

Tragedy Averted In Karkhanoo Bazaar Peshawar
The Bomb Disposal Squad on Monday successfully defused an explosive device in Hayatabad area of Peshawar to avert a major tragedy. According to police, the one-and-half kilogram homemade device was placed in a paint box that was planted in an empty plot along the road near Karkhanoo Bazaar. The police, upon receiving the information about bomb, called bomb disposal squad who defused the explosive device after a labor of 20 minutes. - See more at: http://pakistantribune.com.pk/3884/tragedy-averted-in-karkhanoo-bazaar-peshawar.html#sthash.4hwa4g1I.dpuf
India, Pakistan exchange more gunfire, ceasefire under strain
Police kept army in the dark on DI Khan jailbreak: Initial report

Pakistan: The Punjab threat: Security concerns

Pakistan: Eid celebrations in a rain of blood
So let the people be killed and al Qaedism lead the narrative while we celebrate Eid, happy over the trivial issue that this time from Peshawar to Karachi it was held on one day Tragically this Eid followed the killings of 40 people who had gathered to offer Namaz-e-Jinazah of their colleague who was shot dead a day earlier. The Islamist TTP claimed responsibility. And I wondered why Namaz-e-Jinazah, which is an Islamic farz, was attacked by the Islamic militants who claim they know Shariah better than other Muslims of the world. But this was not the first time. Such suicide attacks had earlier killed many in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP). Even in the worst of the communal riots at the time of the partition, Hindus and Muslims did not attack each other’s funeral rites. Why in the land of the pure even funerals are not safe, that is the question an average Muslim is asking today. The TTP, with each attack in which innocent people are killed, loses support among the Muslims of the country. This Eid sadly followed the killing of many young men who were returning from a football match, the only traditional joy for the poor wretched people of Lyari. The Karachiites know that it was part of the political gang war. It has destroyed the old city, which was once the place of politically conscious people. Lyari used to have dens of underworld gangsters but the local progressive political leadership dominated. Various communities lived with each other in peace in Lyari and its adjoining localities. Trouble started when political parties started patronising different criminal gangs in the scramble to secure their constituencies, a la Bollywood movies. The people of Lyari have no sympathy left for the political parties who have a nexus with criminal gangs. Their children fear to go to school and colleges and their businesses have been badly affected. Many Baloch and Katchi residents, who could afford to, have migrated from their centuries old abodes to other parts of the city. This Eid followed the ethnic killing of 13 Punjabi workers who were going from Balochistan in a Punjab-bound bus. The responsibility was claimed by the Baloch militants, and it doesn’t matter which front or liberation army. This did not serve their cause. Even though we have always supported Balochistan’s right of self-determination and condemned kidnapping and dumping of Baloch activists’ bodies, we have to equally condemn such ethnic killings. The net loser of such actions is the Baloch nationalist movement. Please don’t give me a rationale that the Baloch militants were avenging the killings of their comrades, as two wrongs don’t make a right. Such actions defeat the cause of securing the rights of the people of Balochistan. A point to be noted here that often some progressive writers are afraid to raise is that if the prime objective of the nationalists is the welfare of their people, then in the post-18th Amendment scenario they should focus more on the mismanagement and corruption of their respective provincial governments. I am not suggesting that all the issues of autonomy are solved, but there is a bigger issue of devolution of power to local governments. The nationalist parties and militants are usually quiet on this issue. Narrow or ultra-nationalism breeds fascism leading to ethnic hatred, and it is not a progressive movement. This Eid followed Dera Ismail Khan’s jailbreak, which was organised better than any military operation by the TTP. About 250 inmates escaped and the Taliban took all their comrades to the safe havens in the tribal areas. Although the intelligence agencies had informed much in advance that this jail would be attacked, there was no combined drill of law-enforcing agencies to test the ability to combat the attackers. Both central and provincial governments were found blaming each other and scoring political points, not accepting their utter failure. This was the second jailbreak highlighting the eroding writ of the government. A bitter truth, isn’t it? This Eid followed the PML-N approaching the Supreme Court that while the country is bleeding, their most immediate issue is to perform Umra and sit in Aitekaf, hence presidential elections cannot be held on August 6, which was also the 27th of Ramazan. In the same spirit, the independence of Pakistan, which too fell on the 27th of Ramazan, should have also been postponed after 1947’s Eid. Worst is that the court obliged the PML-N in a most controversial and one-sided decision, impairing its impartiality. Looking at this scenario, what troubles me is that the whole establishment looks confused and has not realised the ‘urgency’ of the existential threat to the country by the Islamic and ethnic militants. The much-talked about meeting to get all the parties’ support against the national security threat has not yet been held. On the other hand, the prime minister takes time out for paying homage to the ‘Emperor’ of the Muslim world: the Saudi King. Meanwhile, unfortunately, the al Qaeda franchisees are having a free hand to establish their superiority over the government in Pakistan. So far they are winning and gaining support from the religious extremists and confused ‘revolutionaries’ who find it hard to condemn them without ‘ifs’ and ‘buts.’ The army is in limbo, its jawans are being killed, as the army chief who is clear-headed about fighting the terrorists is about to retire. The ruling parties stand confused or are afraid of jihadis. So let the people be killed and al Qaedism lead the narrative while we celebrate Eid, happy over the trivial issue that this time from Peshawar to Karachi it was held on one day. Great! This Eid I was reminded of the poem I wrote on December 31, 2007, after Benazir Bhutto who courageously challenged the Taliban in her last speech was assassinated. Almost six years have gone by but we have gone nowhere. Standing in the rain of blood, I recall: Soaked in the rain of blood/Burning tears in my eyes/I stand in the killing fields of Pakistan/Impatient for the 2007 sun to sink into the Arabian Sea/No remorse, no farewell/Good riddance, good riddance/As I look at the horizon to welcome 2008 with hope/Hope the miracle balm that soothes our bleeding wounds/The overcast of bloody 2007 is still looming/Clouds of terror are still thick/Wanton killing winds are still blowing/I’m struggling to keep the flame of hope alight/Hope for peace, hope for end of misery/Hope for love, hope for death of hate/Hope for forbearance, hope for end of intolerance/Am I hoping far too much?/This query is death to quash/Reality checks are ruthless/Vision is pain, knowing is curse/Hope is the only balm for bleeding wounds.By Babar Ayaz
Pakistan: The police lines debacle
Dailu TimesIn what is being called one of the deadliest attacks on the Pakistan police, at least 21 senior and mid-level police officers died amidst high security at the police lines in Quetta on August 7. The entire top police cadre of Balochistan had assembled in the ground adjacent to the mosque in police lines to offer the funeral prayers of one of their officers who had died earlier in the day while he was returning with his two children from Eid shopping. Luckily his children and driver escaped the attack, save a few injuries. As the name denotes, the police lines is one of the highly secure areas of any city. Heavily armed police officers were guarding the gates of the ground when the suicide bomber, wearing a vest containing ball bearings and shrapnel, exploded it while he resisted checking at the entrance. Within seconds the ground presented a scene from some battlefield. Bodies and human flesh were strewn all over. At least 30 people died instantly, most of them police officers. Nearly 62 were reported injured, some sustaining serious injuries. This episode a day before Eid had taken the spirit out of the nation, already inflicted with trauma by incessant terrorist attacks. The unabated spree of terrorism, which has hiked following the new government coming to office, calls for immediate attention. Two months in office and the government has done little to arrest terrorism. The PML-N government is either oblivious of the intensity of the threat confronting the country or is buying time to elicit a favourable response from the stakeholders considered important to develop and implement any National Security Strategy (NSS). The main stakeholder in the anti-terrorism struggle is the Pakistan army, which has been calling the shots on this issue for many years, independent of any government intervention. However, its recent insistence on the government taking ownership of the war on terrorism, though belated, awaits a response. Naturally, reconciling opinions takes time, but given the enormity of the situation, the time lapse is simply putting more energy into the efforts of the terrorists. The terrorists are now being seen as a more unified, determined and well-equipped force, far ahead in capability and preparedness than our soldiers and police. A bad sign indeed. When this serious observation was put to Inspector General (IG) Police Balochistan after the attack, he took exception to the fact. To him the attack was not a security failure. To the IG, blaming the police for the failure to guard its own home, where it was just police everywhere, is tantamount to insulting the sacrifices made by the police in the war on terrorism. According to the IG the police officers had been putting their life at stake to secure the lives of the citizens. One cannot deny the sacrifices made by the police and the army. However, saying that the forces are securing the lives of an ordinary citizen, when anyone could be killed anywhere, depending largely on the whims and plans of the terrorists, is a bit hyperbolic. Getting officers and soldiers killed will not solve the problem. Neither does it add any strength to the national image. These officers are our assets and we need a holistic approach to save them and citizens, instead of making them vulnerable by not appropriating any viable strategy to combat terrorism. The government is expected to announce today the NSS, though the Minister for Interior Chaudry Nisar in his press conference yesterday has hinted at buying more time to develop a composite NSS. However, any delay in developing and implementing a security plan will be detrimental to the sovereignty of the country that we have already blighted by our weakness and inability to understand our national interest.
Norway PM turns secret cabbie in election drive

Pakistan: When enough is not enough

Pakistan violates ceasefire again, fires at Indian positions in Poonch district
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Pakistani troops violated the bilateral ceasefire thrice since Sunday, firing at Indian positions from across the border, a defence spokesman said on Monday. "Pakistani troops resorted to unprovoked firing from across the Line of Control (LoC) in Digwar village of Poonch district at our positions around 10 pm last night (Sunday), the spokesman told IANS. India responded to the Pakistani fire, and the firing continued till 6 am on Monday, according to reports. No casualities or damage on our side has been reported. Pakistan used heavy weapons to fire at the Indian positions. Earlier on Sunday, Pakistani Rangers had fired at a Border Security Force (BSF) post at Kanachak in Jammu district, injuring a BSF trooper. Pakistan also violated the bilateral ceasefire when it fired at Indian positions at Balakot area in Poonch district. Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah said that violations of ceasefire along the LoC by Pakistan were triggered to force India to respond. He also said these violations were intended to either facilitate infiltration or distract attention from internal failures of Pakistan. A bilateral ceasefire signed by India and Pakistan in November 2003 brought in a modicum of normalcy in the lives of thousands of people living along the LoC and the international in divided Kashmir. Pakistan, meanwhile, continued with its aggressive stance and denied any wrongdoing on Sunday. Officials in Islamabad warned of a possible escalation in tensions with India if the latest initiative of PM Nawaz Sharif failed. Military officials said army movements to bring forces to the Indian border may start in the coming week. "Troops stationed on the Afghan border may be re-deployed if the tensions increase," an army spokesman said. Moreover, Pakistan accused India of attacks in Sialkot. An army official said unprovoked firing from the Indian side targeted Rangers outposts in the sector. In New Delhi, external affairs minister Salman Khurshid said India wants the Pakistan government to take responsibility for the killing of five of its soldiers on the LoC on August 6. "The responsibility must rest with the government. Our meeting point is the civilian-elected government of Pakistan, not the Pakistan Army or any other agency," Khurshid told Karan Thapar in CNN IBN's programme Devil's-Advocate that was telecast on Sunday. Meanwhile, BSF jawan Ram Niwas Meena, who was injured in firing in the Samba sector on August 5, succumbed to his wounds on Sunday at AIIMS in Delhi.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)