Monday, March 15, 2021

Music Video - BTS - Dynamite Live Performance at Grammy Awards 2021

Video Report - #Myanmar #China China urges action over attacks on Chinese-owned factories in Myanmar

Video Report - #Netherlands The Netherlands sees a resurgence of youth in politics

Video Report - How one Republican-leaning county is welcoming Biden's Covid-19 relief

Video Report - John King: This is why the CDC director is worried ...

Music Video - Megan Thee Stallion & Beyonce - Savage

Music Video - #TaylorSwift #cardigan #folklore Taylor Swift - cardigan

Video - Taylor Swift Wins Album Of The Year | 2021 GRAMMY Awards Show Acceptance Speech

#GRAMMYs #Beyoncé #bestr Beyoncé Wins Best R&B Performance | 2021 GRAMMY Awards Show Acceptance Speech

The #Grammys' diverse winner list isn't box-ticking – these are terrific artists


 Alexis Petridis

While questions rightly remain over its shadowy nominations process, Grammy voters should be praised for honoring a large number of women and people of color.
T

T

he Grammys always attract a degree of controversy. This year, there was singer Teyana Taylor protesting that “all I see is dick” in the all-male nominations for best R&B album, and a slightly peculiar statement from Justin Bieber, asking to be considered an R&B artist rather than a pop singer. More headlines were grabbed by the Weeknd, understandably shocked that his double-platinum album After Hours, and its accompanying single Blinding Lights – a song so omnipresent that it recently celebrated an entire year in the US Top 10 – didn’t receive a single nomination: he subsequently announced he would stop his label submitting his music in future. The latter’s complaint revolved around a lack of transparency in the voting process: the presence of nomination committees that retain executive power over who makes the shortlists and who hold the ability to add artists who have received no nominations in many of the Grammys’ categories.

 

The argument about transparency isn’t going to go away – if your voting process involves a shadowy and apparently unanswerable cabal who exert control over the nominations, you should probably expect people to look askance at it – but, the absence of the Weeknd aside, the actual winners in the Grammys’ big categories brooked little argument.

There wasn’t anything resembling the 2020 Brit awards controversy over a lack of female representation, when so few women were nominated that even the event’s host, Jack Whitehall, accused the BPI of “recycling all sorts of excuses” over the issue. Quite the opposite: Taylor Swift became the first female artist in history to win album of the year three times – vindication for the left-turn away from brash pop on her album Folklore – while Megan Thee Stallion ended 17 years of male dominance in the best rap song category, and Beyoncé shifted into second position in the list of most-awarded artists of all time (behind Hungarian-British conductor Georg Solti).
Meanwhile, the accusations of racism at last year’s Grammys, when best rap album winner Tyler, the Creator suggested that black artists were pigeonholed and wondered aloud “why can’t we be in pop?” appeared to have hit home. Megan Thee Stallion won best new artist; Brittany Howard best rock song for Stay High; HER’s I Can’t Breathe took home song of the year, as it deserved to do: if you want a potent musical reflection of the racial tumult of the last 12 months, I Can’t Breathe is it. There were no major upsets, no outbreaks of the Grammys’ time-honoured tradition of WTF moments. Billie Eilish said that Megan Thee Stallion’s Savage remix should have won record of the year instead of her own Everything I Wanted and demanded the crowd applaud the rapper, but, in truth, Everything I Wanted is a great record: its win isn’t a return to the deeply fishy years when Simply Red or Leo Sayer waltzed off with best R&B song.
If you could see where the impetus to make changes had come from, crucially, none of the awards looked like an exercise in box-ticking designed to assuage criticism: they felt deserved. You can only hope the Brits take note.

Video Report - Will Imran Complete His Term? Will Maryam Go To London Or Jail? | With Najam Sethi

Video Report - Chairman PPP is addressing the ceremony of tree plantation drive in Khatri Forest, HYD

Video Report - Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto - Addressing the closing ceremony of Sindh Livestock Expo in HYD.

Once Again, Pakistan’s Women’s March Is Targeted With a Vicious Smear Campaign

By Allia Bukhari
Pakistani women challenging toxic masculinity are being vilified.
On March 8, dozens of Pakistani women in all major cities took to the streets to highlight discrimination, inequality, violence, abuse, and injustices against them and other marginalized communities in the country. Despite threats and right-wing attacks on the Aurat March last year, the demonstrators were resilient and undeterred in putting forward their demands, which emphasized prioritizing healthcare for women during the pandemic and ensuring protection against patriarchal violence among others. But as is all-too-typical for Pakistan, the women’s day demonstration — on the only day when women voice their concerns in large numbers — was met by resistance and a smear campaign.
A disinformation campaign was unleashed on social media with a doctored video purporting to show “blasphemous” slogans taking over Twitter. The video was even shared by some right-wing TV anchors and journalists without fact-checking. A feminist organization, Women Democratic Front’s (WDF), had its flag misrepresented on social media as that of France to portray the movement as anti-Islam, given the anti-Muslim discourse is on the rise in the European country.
When opponents of the march couldn’t justify their anti-women arguments with reason and intellect, they resorted to propaganda – and that too involving extremely volatile and sensitive sentiments around religion and blasphemy in a society where people have been jailed or even killed over such accusations. Clearly certain quarters will go to any lengths to malign the women’s rights campaign without regard for the repercussions the move may have, including endangering innocent lives. The Pakistani Taliban also threatened the march organizers and demanded that the government prosecute them for blasphemy.
The horrific motorway rape incident last year along with the steady stream of honor killings and forced marriages are a shameful reminder of the country’s collective failure to ensure women’s safety. At a time when cases of violence against women have recently doubled, as revealed by a report titled “Tracking Numbers: State of Violence Against Women and Children in Pakistan,” women’s rights campaigns are crucial to highlight atrocities against them.
On the economic front too, Pakistan is one of those countries where limited opportunities are available for women. Just 20 percent of women are part of the workforce in the country, while the pay gap between men and women has also increased. A United Nations Development Program (UNDP) report revealed that Pakistan topped the list of countries holding prejudiced views against women; the percentage of people holding at least one sexist bias was the highest in Pakistan of the countries surveyed, at 99.8 percent.
Despite such worrying statistics and the abysmal state of affairs for women, any attempt to empower and speak up for the female population in Pakistan, whether it’s the global #MeToo movement or the annual Aurat March, has largely been met with sheer ignorance, toxic chauvinism, and intolerance from society at large. Misogynistic, hateful comments on social media and demeaning posts become a regular occurrence every Women’s Day. While elsewhere in the world, people celebrate women’s achievements and advocate for their better representation and rights, in Pakistan the moral brigade takes over to issue judgements on what is socially acceptable and what is not, seemingly protecting the non-egalitarian norms and values that have been largely formulated to control and suppress women and gender minorities.
Several factors have contributed to this backlash and hate against women, who are already greatly discriminated against. Opponents term these yearly marches as un-Islamic and “immoral” based on some of the slogans like “mera jism meri marzi” (my body, my choice”) that are used in marches.
In a country where conservative values are central to the national narrative, this phenomenon traces back to the time of independence. With the demand to have a separate homeland for the Muslims of the subcontinent, religion became the basis for Pakistan’s very existence. Thus non-egalitarian religious nationalism has always been at the core of society’s values. The rise of fundamentalist leaders, however, especially military dictator Zia-ul-Haq’s Islamization and the absence of real democracy, meant that these values got instilled deeper and deeper into the country’s social fabric and were started getting misused to maintain a certain balance of power. Rules have been made by men for men.
Feminist scholars argue that there are “limits to Muslim women’s piety” – again, as defined by men in patriarchal societies – and there is a need to promote the potential for females’ autonomy and liberal freedoms in such societies. Pakistani women are now standing up to intimidation, injustice, and an environment of fear and inequality. They demand autonomy and structural and transformational changes. In doing so, they are seen as challenging male dominance, and are therefore bearing the brunt of online vitriol and smear campaign from all corners.
https://thediplomat.com/2021/03/once-again-pakistans-womens-march-is-targeted-with-a-vicious-smear-campaign/

#Pakistan - Results of by elections are a proof that nation stands with PDM, Chairman #PPP

Chairman Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has said that all the achievements of the PDM till date have been achieved from within the Parliament adding that if the Senate election had been boycotted, Imran Khan would have been celebrating getting a super majority in the upper house today.Talking to media on the sidelines of Livestock Expo-2021 organized by Sindh Livestock, Wildlife and Fisheries Department in Hyderabad, the PPP Chairman said that the option of resignations from the assemblies should be used like an atom bomb. But whatever decisions are made will be made by consensus. He said that the victory of PDM candidate in the election of Senate Chairman is in front of everyone, who got 49 votes, while the government candidate got 48 votes. “The manner in which the election of Chairman Senate was rigged is also in front of the whole of Pakistan, through which Sanjrani has been wrongly given a seat for some time, he said adding that we would approach the High Court on the issue of rejection of seven votes in the election of Senate Chairman.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari pointed out that the Supreme Court had ruled in such cases in 2004 and 2007 that in case of ambiguity, the decision would be based on the will of the voters. “Therefore, we are 100% sure that the court will rule on the basis of justice precedence,” he added. He said that PPP is a part of PDM and future course of action will be taken by consensus. The PPP Chairman said that if by-elections had not been held, the whole of Pakistan could not have been shown that the people were not with the selected and as a result of participating in both the phases of the Senate elections, fake majority in both the houses of government has been exposed. PPP Chairman further said that by-elections and participation in Senate elections were the right decisions of PDM as now the majority of the government is also in danger in Punjab. Replying to a question, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the entire country has suffered due to the present incompetent, incapable and illegitimate government, but the agricultural sector has suffered gravely. “Onion and tomato growers in Sindh have suffered a lot due to anti-agriculture policies of the federal government,” he stated.
Asked by a journalist about the ongoing operation against encroachments, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that it was unfortunate to evict the poor in the name of encroachment. Such measures should be taken only if the victims have been provided with alternative accommodation. He said that the PPP leadership and the people of Sindh did not want to hear that a meeting was held and there was some discussion on the issue in the assembly. Rather, they want the Sindh government to legislate in this regard and the houses of the poor are on the banks of drains or elsewhere they should be given legal protection.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari further said that he did not want to upset any court, we want to obey its order, but no one’s house should be demolished till the exchange arrangements are made for the victims.Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the organization of Livestock Expo by the Department of Fisheries and Livestock is a good step, which is giving positive results for the development of this sector, adding that the Sindh government is making various efforts to create employment opportunities for the public in province and the ongoing expo of Livestock is also a part of such initiatives.
Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah, Provincial Minister for Livestocks and Fisheries Abdul Bari Pitafi, other members of Sindh cabinet Nasir Hussain Shah, Sohail Anwar Siyal, Ismail Rahu and Murtaza Wahab, MPAs Sharjeel Memon, Jam Khan Shoro and other leaders were also present on the occasion.
https://www.ppp.org.pk/pr/24468/