With his party forecast to land a victory in Japan's lower house election on Sunday, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, if elected again, should decide how to deal with his country's alarming rightward drift, as it has increasingly become Tokyo's liability in the long run.
Most polls released so far have suggested that the Liberal Democratic Party-led coalition would secure a parliament majority in the 473-seat Diet, marking a convenient victory for Abe, who forced the dissolvement of parliament for a snap election last month.
However, while revelling in the imminent electoral bliss, Abe should remember that what the vote reflects is the constituency's longing for political stability, rather than their affirmation of Tokyo's increasingly nationalistic diplomatic and security agendas.
In fact, the public has been rattled by the country's chilly interactions with nearly all of its East Asian neighbors, as can be seen by this year's frustratingly low turnout.
Solely in 2014, the island country has repeatedly enraged its neighboring countries by, among others, flagrant visits of cabinet members and lawmakers to the notorious Yasukuni Shrine, and their blatant denials of war-time recruitment of over 200,000 foreign sex slaves.
Besides those provocations, Japan has also get on the region's nerves by pushing for the removal of the long-standing ban on collective self-defense in an attempt to enable the country to battle overseas and thus virtually gut the post-war pacifist constitution.
These offensive moves have frozen the political ties between Japan and its neighbors, with severe implications on the country's struggling while highly export-dependent economy.
Moreover, Japan's frequent frictions and scarce high-level exchanges with its irritated neighbors have increasingly threatened regional stability and drawn backlashes even from the United States, its major ally.
With all these consequences in sight, no wonder that Abe sought a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping during the APEC forum last month, after the two sides reached a four-point agreement to ease tensions.
However, achieving a rapprochement with its neighbors demands more initiative from Tokyo to extend honesty with its war-time atrocities, loyalty to its pacifist Constitution, and prudence in the simmering territorial disputes.
As the volatile region is to embrace the dawn of 2015 soon, it is highly advisable and imperative that Tokyo face up to its responsibility, shake off the rightist ideology and translate its diplomatic commitment into real actions. If Abe retains the power, the onus will be on him to do that.
M WAQAR..... "A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary.Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." --Albert Einstein !!! NEWS,ARTICLES,EDITORIALS,MUSIC... Ze chi pe mayeen yum da agha pukhtunistan de.....(Liberal,Progressive,Secular World.)''Secularism is not against religion; it is the message of humanity.'' تل ده وی پثتونستآن
Monday, December 15, 2014
Video Report - Russia Is Back In Afghanistan -- With Millions In Investment
Russia has been investing heavily in Afghanistan for the past two years, restoring once-abandoned factories and funding new infrastructure ventures. Moscow’s outlay on scores of projects marks its return to a country the Soviet Union considered part of its strategic backyard.
Concern about democracy and press freedom in Turkey
Trials against reporters and Turkish soccer fans follow on the heels of a crackdown this weekend on Turkish media critical of President Erdogan. Observers are worried about where the state is headed.
Almost exactly one year after corruption charges against the Turkish government were made public on December 17, 2013, critics of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan face trial on Tuesday.
35 members of the Besiktas football team's fan club, known as the Carsi, are accused of planning an armed rebellion and inciting protests against the Erdogan government. The prosecution is seeking life sentences.
In a separate trial that starts on Wednesday in Istanbul, four journalists face charges of having leaked state secrets. The prosecution is seeking up to ten years in prison for Cumhuriyet's Ibrahim Yildiz and Aykut Kücükkaya, and Mustafa Ilker Yücel and Murat Simsek of the Aydinlik daily.
Ignoring a news embargo in the spring, both newspapers had reported details from a confidential, wiretapped meeting among senior government officials about a possible Turkish military intervention in Syria.
A waste of time
On Sunday, Turkish police raided media outlets, detaining Ekrem Dumanli, the editor-in-chief of the Zaman daily newspaper, and several others. Zaman is close to the movement of US-based Muslim cleric Fethullah Gülen, who is regarded as an Erdogan opponent.
Dumanli and the other detainees, the Carsi supporters and the four journalists facing trial this week all have one thing in common: they offended the government.
President Erdogan and Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu regard the Gezi Park unrest as well as the publication of bugged phone calls made by members of the government as acts targeted at weakening or even toppling the government.
Gülen and his supporters have denied any ambition to overthrow Turkey's leadership.
"The prosecution is currently translating this version of events into penal law," says Emma Sinclair-Webb, a Turkey researcher with Human Rights Watch.
The Carsi trial in particular is "grotesque and a waste of time," she told DW.
Prosecutors base their charges on statements and the defendants' wiretapped phone conversations. A march to Erdogan's Istanbul office - he was still Prime Minister at the time - is regarded as proof of a coup.
Evidence is scandalously scanty, Sinclair-Webb says. "The charges should be dismissed on day one of the trial."
Pressure on the media
In the case against the four reporters, the prosecution argues press freedom doesn't cover the publication of confidential ministerial talks.
The defense counters that details of the bugged talks were already being circulated on the Internet, and thus available to the whole world, before the journalists on trial made them public.
Can Güleryüzlü, a member of the board with the Turkish CGD Journalists Association, accuses the government of stepping up pressure on the media.
News is increasingly embargoed in an effort to prevent reports about unpleasant issues, Güleryüzlü told DW. Today, he adds, the question is whether Turkey is still a state of constitutional legality where the right to personal freedom applies.
Turkey's shortcomings
In its most recent progress evaluation report, the EU points out deficits in Turkey's freedom of the press and its fight against corruption. The European Union also sharply criticized the mass arrest of dozens of members of the press on Sunday.
Brussels was critical of how Ankara handled last year's Gezi Park protests, so the upcoming Carsi trial and proceedings against the four reporters may well rekindle that criticism. Kati Piri, the European Parliament's new rapporteur on Turkey, voiced concerns last week over a planned new security bill that critics claim would give the state more power.
Turkey has been recognized as a candidate for full EU membership since 1999, but has struggled to make progress in gaining this status. President Erdogan lashed out at the bloc on Monday after its criticism of Sunday's police raids on media houses. "We have no concern about what the EU might say, whether the EU accepts us or not, we have no such concern. Please keep your wisdom to yourself," Erdogan said Monday.
Both Güleryüzlü and human rights activist Sinclair-Webb say the trials fuel fears of an "erosion" of Turkey's constitutional legality. Apparently, they say, the government has great influence on parts of the justice system. Turkey is already looking at an "appalling" development where press freedom is concerned, they say.
Following the raids, the spokesman for Germany's chancellor Angela Merkel said that it was "in Turkey's own interest to clear up any possible doubt over its commitment to basic democratic principles." Erdogan said that the raids have "nothing to do with" press freedom.
Opinion: Racism and the US media
The cases of Michael Brown and Eric Garner show one-sided reporting in America's media. But in certain cases, says DW's Nalan Sipar, both sides are guilty of misrepresenting the facts.
"Michael Brown was the bad guy in this case," said award-winning journalist Bernie Goldberg on Fox News on November 25, the night the grand jury in Missouri decided that a white police officer should not be charged for the fatal shooting of the black teenager. "Please, America, let's not turn this kid into some kind of civil rights martyr, because that he is not."
Immediately after the verdict was announced, thousands of people protested took to the streets in protest in Ferguson. Major television networks like CNN, Fox News, ABC and NBC followed every second of the events, showing pictures of rioting and looting, of angry and, for the most part, black demonstrators smashing windows or pelting police with stones. But the question of why people were so angry and what they were demanding was given little attention.
'Protest images are attractive to the media'
"Images of violence in the streets or shattered windows are attractive images for television," said Robert M. Entman, professor of international affairs at George Washington University. Entman, whose research looks at the relationship between racism and the media, told DW that such images contribute to a lack of comprehension in society, as they provide no explanation for the protests.
The outrage over the grand jury decision in the Brown case had hardly subsided verdict when another grand jury decision over the death of 43-year-old black Staten Island resident Eric Garner set things off again.
Garner, who was arrested in July on suspicion of illegally selling cigarettes on the streets, died when a police officer tackled him to the ground in a chokehold. In the struggle, the asthmatic man wheezed several times "I can't breathe," before dying of heart failure.
Chasm between black and white
Since the grand jury judgment in the Garner case on December 3, thousands of demonstrators have taken to the streets in almost daily protests, at times blocking major streets and call out Garner's last words. But the media seem to have learned little.
These mostly peaceful protests have been linked by the major news networks with rare police clashes. And even in the Garner case, where the question of whether the death was connected to possible police violence, the issue received little attention. The images shown on TV were intended not just to spread information but also form opinions, said Entman.
"Unfortunately, there's an ideological divide in the US and the conservative media stand on the side of the police, even if they have made a terrible mistake," said Entman. He fears that such media reports will only widen the gap between America's white and black communities. "And this is the real tragedy."
Questionable statistics
Images aren't the only thing spreading misinformation. In recent months, some broadcasters have produced dubious statistics that haven't quite reflected the truth.
On August 20, conservative radio host Larry Elder asked professor Marc Lamont Hill on a CNN debate how often an unarmed "black" is shot by a "cop." "Every 28 hours. Every 28 hours, Larry," Hill replied, referring to a study by the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement, a human rights organization.
The website Politifact.com, a pool of journalists and editors which investigate such claims, took a closer look at the statistics. On its website, it stated that this claim had no scientific basis and was based on the work of an amateur researcher.
Fox News anchor Bill O'Reilly was similarly careless with the statistics on his December 1 show, when he quoted a US government agency that claimed that the number of "black Americans" killed by police had dropped 70 percent over the last 50 years. Politifact also looked into this claim, concluding that the figures weren't complete and therefore unreliable.
Despite their sometimes biased reports, Fox News and CNN still have the highest ratings. According to a survey by the Pew Research Center, 44 percent of Americans watch CNN, while 39 percent tune into Fox News. NBC and ABC also enjoy 37 percent of the American audience.
However, those figures are expected to change. According to another Pew study, more and more people are turning to online sources for their news.
Police storm Australia cafe where gunman was holding hostages
http://www.cnn.com/
Gunfire erupted early Tuesday at the Sydney cafe where a gunman has been holding hostages.
Police could be seen throwing flash-bang grenades into the cafe in video aired by CNN affiliate Seven Network.
At least one person has been shot, Australian state broadcaster ABC reported. Medics were performing CPR on two people, the broadcaster reported.
The fate of the hostages and the gunman, identified by an official with direct knowledge of the situation as Man Haron Monis, was unclear Tuesday.
Hundreds of police officers, including snipers, had surrounded the Lindt Chocolate Cafe in Sydney's central business district shortly after the gunman took over the building at 10 a.m. Monday (6 p.m. ET on Sunday).
Chilling images from Australian media on Monday showed people, believed to be hostages, with their hands pressed against the cafe's windows. They were holding up a black flag with Arabic writing on it reading, "There is no God but God and Mohammed is the prophet of God."
Five hostages sprinted out of the cafe toward heavily armed police officers several hours into the standoff, sending the gunman into an agitated tirade, according to an Australian reporter.
Chris Reason, a correspondent for CNN affiliate Seven Network, said the gunman became "extremely agitated" when he realized what had happened and "started screaming orders" at the remaining hostages.
Reason said he could see the gunman pacing past the cafe's windows from his vantage point at the network's nearby offices. He described the man as unshaven, wearing a white shirt and black cap and carrying a shotgun.
The gunman made his demands for a flag and phone call through hostages who contacted several media organizations, CNN affiliate Sky News Australia reported.
Some had also reportedly posted messages to social networking sites and the YouTube online video service. Police urged media early Tuesday not to show the videos.
The gunman has been identified as Man Haron Monis, an official with direct knowledge of the situation told CNN.
Also known as Sheikh Haron, he pleaded guilty in 2013 to writing letters to Australian service members saying they were "Hitler's soldiers," according to Australian media reports.
He is probably acting alone and does not appear to be part of a broader plot, additional U.S. law enforcement and intelligence sources say.
Beyond the demands for the flag and phone call, precisely what he wants remained murky late Monday.
As night fell, Reason said the cafe's lights had been turned off, plunging the interior into "complete darkness."
Before some of the hostages had fled, Seven Network reported that at least 13 people were being held at the cafe, but police declined to say how many were in there. New South Wales Police Deputy Commissioner Catherine Burn said it was fewer than 30.
The incident left Australians shaken.
"We are doing all we can to set you free," New South Wales Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said at a news conference Monday, directing his comments to the hostages and their loved ones.
Abbott called the incident "profoundly shocking."
Bustling area eerily quiet
Police barricaded off streets and evacuated buildings near the cafe, bringing an eerie quiet to a district typically buzzing with pedestrians and vehicles.
"The police presence here is like nothing the center of Sydney has ever seen," Luke McIlveen, editor of the Daily Mail Australia, told CNN on Monday.
The Martin Place train station was shut down, according to police. They urged people to stay away from the area, but some local office workers gathered at the scene to try to find out what was going on.
The buildings evacuated included the U.S. Consulate General, spokeswoman Alicia Edwards said. All personnel have been accounted for, although it's not known whether there are any U.S. citizens among the hostages.
U.S. President Barack Obama has been briefed on the situation.
The company that runs the cafe, Lindt Chocolate Cafe Australia, said it was "deeply concerned over this serious incident and our thoughts and prayers are with the staff and customers involved and all their friends and families."
'That could be me'
The hostages appeared to include staff and customers who were taken captive as commuters were heading to work Monday morning in the Martin Place area, where big institutions like the Reserve Bank of Australia are located.
One employee of the cafe, who was due to work a later shift Monday, was deeply shaken after seeing footage of some of her colleagues pressed against the window.
"That could be me, right there, standing at that window, standing there, holding that flag, being told not to move," Kathryn Chee, 25, told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. "It's just horrifying."
Chris Kenny, an editor at The Australian newspaper, said he was at the cafe Monday morning. He left shortly before the siege started.
"As police quickly swarmed and cleared the area, I turned to see a man against the window, facing out with his hands raised," he wrote in his account of the incident. "At first I was relieved thinking this was the gunman responding to police -- but soon the awful realization the customers were being forced against the windows."
Narrow escape
A cafe worker who asked for safety reasons to be identified by his first name, Nathan, said he almost became one of the hostages.
Nathan said he arrived at the cafe in the morning, but when he tried to go in, some of his co-workers told him it was closed for the day.
"At this point, I'm thinking something is definitely off," he said. "I could see a hand and what looked like half a gun. I only saw part of his (the gunman's) body."
He said the cafe had both its doors locked, which is unusual at that time.
Muslim leaders condemn hostage taking
The writing on the flag in the window stoked fears that the crisis in Sydney could be linked to Islamic extremists. Australia, which is part of the international coalition fighting ISIS in the Middle East, said in September that it had foiled a plot by Islamic militants to carry out a public execution.
Commissioner Scipione said that it wasn't yet clear whether the situation at the cafe was a terrorist event, but that police are on "a footing that would be consistent with a terrorist alert."
He said the crisis was contained to the area around the cafe.
"We are only at this stage dealing with one location," Scipione said. "We are not at this stage concerned about any other."
Police said they are also monitoring social media amid reports that some of the hostages were posting updates from inside the cafe.
Muslim leaders in Australia condemned the hostage taking, calling it "a criminal act."
"Such actions are denounced in part and in whole in Islam," the Grand Mufti of Australia and the Australian National Imams Council said in a statement on Facebook.
Leaders elsewhere also condemned the incident and expressed concern.
"Again irreligious extremists hold innocent people hostage and hijack Islam," Queen Rania of Jordan said on Twitter.
Responses from U.S., UK, Twitter
British Prime Minister David Cameron said he'd been briefed on the situation.
"It's deeply concerning and my thoughts are with all those caught up on it," he said on Twitter.
The U.S. State Department also spoke out: "Our hearts and prayers go out to those who are being held hostage," the agency tweeted.
And out of concern that an anti-Islamic backlash to the incident could endanger innocent Muslims, Twitter users organized a campaign to find traveling companions for people who feared for their safety.
"The #illridewithyou hashtag makes me so proud to be Australian," Twitter user "Mifrah Mahroof" said Monday. "Thanks for the support everyone."
Sydney Hostage Taker Identified as Man Haron Monis
Man Haron Monis, a self-proclaimed Islamic “sheikh” and alleged sexual predator, has been identified as the gunman holding multiple people hostage in an hours-long standoff in a café in Sydney, according to Australian media.
Overnight hostages reportedly spoke to Australian television stations and identified their captor, though police requested outlets not publish it at the time.
Man Haron Monis was born in Iran as Manteghi Bourjerdi and migrated to Australia in 1996, according to Australia’s 9News. In 2013 he made headlines when he pleaded guilty to sending letters to the families of fallen Australian servicemen in which he called the soldiers “murderers” and child killers. Monis was sentenced to community service.
Australian media reported more recently that Monis had been accused of dozens of counts of sexual assault while he was working as a “spiritual healer” and was allegedly linked to the brutal murder of an ex-wife.
A website that appears to have been made by Monis or his supporters says these latest allegations are “in fact political cases against this Muslim activist, not real criminal cases.”
The website says Monis is “not a member of any organization or party” but he “supports his Muslim brothers [and] sisters… [and] he promotes peace.”
Up to 30 hostages have been held in a Lindt chocolate shop in Sydney for hours. In addition to the calls to the news stations, the hostages were made to produce web videos in which they listed the gunman’s demands.
Hours earlier, two hostages were made to hold a black flag with Islamic text on it up in the window of the shop.
Australian police previously had said they had identified the gunman and were aware of him prior to this incident.
Dr. Jamal Rifi, a Sydney Muslim community leader, told 9News that the Muslim community had approached police about Monis before.
“We’re not going to let thugs or radicals or the racists decide our society for us,” he said.
Australia - Some Hostages Flee as Standoff in Sydney Drags On
By MICHELLE INNISDEC An assailant carrying a black flag with white Arabic script held hostages in one of this sunny city’s favored holiday haunts — a cafe specializing in chocolate drinks and desserts — through the day Monday, throwing Sydney’s center into lockdown and testing Australia’s heavily armed tactical response police, negotiators and the government’s readiness for a terrorist attack. The assailant walked into the Lindt Chocolate Café, at the top of Sydney’s Martin Place in the city center, at around 9:45 a.m. local time, locking the door and capturing an unknown number of cafe workers and coffee and chocolate drinkers, some picking up a caffeine hit on their way to work, others taking a midmorning break. The cafe is as much a regular coffee stop for local office workers as it is a tourist draw. Helicopters hovered over the city, the train network was temporarily stopped and strategic buildings — including the nearby Sydney Opera House, the New South Wales Parliament, the state library, law courts and the Reserve Bank were evacuated or shut down. Traffic on part of Sydney’s iconic Harbor Bridge was stopped. Prime Minister Tony Abbott confirmed he had briefed the National Security Committee of the cabinet twice within six hours, and two ministers were returning from overseas, underscoring the seriousness of the siege. “This is a very disturbing incident,” Mr. Abbott said in a televised message from Canberra, the nation’s capital. “It is profoundly shocking that innocent people should be held hostage by an armed person claiming political motivation. “We are a free, open and generous people, and today we have responded to this in character. Yes, it has been a difficult day. Yes, it has been a day which has tested us, but so far, like Australians in all sorts of situations, we have risen to the challenge.” Five people, including two cafe employees, had fled by 7 p.m. local time, but it was not clear whether the assailant had allowed them to leave or they had escaped. Stephen Loane, the chief executive of Lindt Australia, said that nine or 10 employees were inside the cafe when the siege started, along with an unknown number of customers. “Originally, we were thinking it was a holdup,” he said, but “by the time I got down there, the streets were blocked off and there was a different situation.”
Soon after the siege began, a commercial television network, Channel Seven, which has a nearby studio, showed footage of people, one wearing the Lindt Café uniform, pressed against the cafe window, holding up the black flag with white script. The deputy police commissioner, Catherine Burn, said that the police had made contact with the armed person inside the cafe, and that they were working to resolve the standoff “peacefully.” “Nobody has been harmed or injured at the moment,” she said. “We have been working through our negotiations to try to make sure that people inside” have “what they need so that they don’t become ill or injured.'’ Offices near the cafe had been evacuated and a number of streets were closed, the police said. The police also asked that people in offices nearby “remain indoors and away from open windows.” Live television footage showed shoppers and office workers gathered some distance from the cafe, behind shelters, and television news showed heavily armed police officers in the area. The police did not say whether a terrorist group or an individual with links to terrorism was behind the siege. But James Brown, a military analyst at the Lowy Institute for International Policy in Sydney, said, “Someone in that shop wants us to know they have an Islamic link.” He added: “They could be doing it for any one of a number of reasons; it could be a terror-related incident. It is unclear what outcome they want.” Peter Jenkins, executive director of the Australian Strategic Police Institute and a national security expert, said there was the possibility that the offender was working alone, but added that this presented bigger problems for the police and security staff than tracking a terror organization. “A self-radicalizing individual can be someone who is marginalized in society,” he said. “You have to rely on information from work colleagues or family. It’s hard to know much in advance about what might go on, if it is a lone wolf.” However, the attack is eerily similar to one outlined earlier this year, when the police conducted counterterrorism raids across Sydney. The raids netted two people who were charged. On Sept. 12, Mr. Abbott raised Australia’s terrorism alert level from medium to high after warnings from the nation’s security officials that there were increased threats to the nation. Two weeks later, police officers in Melbourne shot dead a man — a known terror suspect — who lashed at them with a knife. Speaking to the Australian Parliament in late September, Mr. Abbott said that an Australian Islamic State operative had instructed his followers to pluck people from the street to conduct a demonstration killing. “All that would be needed to conduct such an attack is a knife, a camera phone and a victim,” Mr. Abbott said. Mr. Abbott’s warning followed a September statement from an Islamic State spokesman, Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, to Muslims in Australia to carry out a lone-wolf attack. Mr. Abbott, who heads the conservative Liberal Party, followed up his warning with legislation giving the police broader powers to arrest suspects and cracking down on the news media’s reporting. He had also responded quickly to President Obama’s appeal several months ago for support in the fight against the Islamic State, sending a squadron of fighter jets and several hundred Australian military personnel to the Middle East. This move was criticized by some analysts in Australia as likely to foment more anger from young Australian Muslim extremists. Tobias Feakin, a national security expert with the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, said that “there is a lot more noise to hear when there’s a network to track,” rather than an individual acting alone. “These people are using low-level technology, and anything can present as an opportunity. Individuals leave fewer tracks.” He said that the flag pressed to the cafe window in the early stages of the siege was not an act exclusively associated with any one terrorist group, but that the flag had been flown on previous occasions by the Islamic State, which is also known as ISIS or ISIL The commissioner of the New South Wales Police, Andrew Scipione, said at a news conference Monday night that no one had been injured during the siege, “and for that we are grateful.” He said that the five hostages that had left the cafe would work with the police through the night. He also asked that anyone in contact with the assailant should ask the assailant to remain in contact with the police. The police continue to hold tightly information about how many hostages remained in the cafe, the motive for the siege and whether the offender is known to the police. There have been a handful of attacks outside of the Middle East in recent months that have been carried out by people who have been linked to Islamic extremism. In October, a man drove over two soldiers in a car crash in a Quebec strip mall, killing one and injuring the other. Canadian officials suggested the attacker was inspired by the Islamic State. Two days later, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, a recent convert to Islam, fatally shot a soldier at the National War Memorial in the Canadian capital of Ottawa, then entered the Parliament building, where he was killed in a firefight with the police. In May, three people were shot and killed at the Jewish Museum in Brussels. A fourth victim died weeks later. The French police later arrested a 29-year-old French suspect who French and Belgian officials said had traveled to Syria to fight with radical Islamists and had links with the Islamic State. Australian intelligence officials have estimated that about 70 Australian citizens, typically disaffected young Muslim men from immigrant families, have joined the Islamic State. The passports of about 100 others have been canceled for fear they might do the same, they said. The Australian Federal Police made seven arrests for terrorism offenses in the 12 months ending Oct. 31. The United States Consulate General in Sydney, which is about a block from the cafe, was evacuated during the siege Monday. A spokeswoman for the United States Embassy in Canberra said that American officials did not yet know the nationality of the people being held. Lindt posted a statement to its Facebook page thanking people “for their thoughts and kind support.” The statement added that, “Our thoughts and prayers are with the staff and customers involved and all their friends and families,” and that the matter was being dealt with by the authorities. The Grand Mufti of Australia, Professor Ibrahim Abu Mohamed, and the Australian National Imams Council issued a joint statement assailing “this criminal act.”
Celine Cooper: In 2014, Malala Yousafzai was the selfless celebrity we needed
CELINE COOPER
It’s December, which means it’s year-in-review time again. So who will top the palmarès as 2014’s most powerful person? Richest? Sexiest?
You know what I would love to see? A list of 2014’s most worthy celebrities. My No. 1 would go to 17-year-old Malala Yousafzai, this year’s co-laureate of the Nobel Peace Prize. If ever there were a role model for our times, she is it.
Malala’s story of determination and survival has been on a loop since she was shot in 2012. Still, it bears repeating: Malala was born into a Pashtun family in Pakistan’s Swat Valley. The district was a tourist destination until the Taliban bore down, restricting girls’ access to schools and eventually imposing Shariah law in 2009. Malala began speaking out for children’s education when she was only 10 years old. In 2008, she travelled to Peshawar where she gave a speech titled: “How dare the Taliban take away my basic right to education?” As militants bombed schools and threatened teachers, students and parents, she began blogging anonymously for the BBC about the rights abuses in her home district in Swat under Taliban rule.
In October 2012, a Taliban gunman boarded her school bus and shot her in the head for her high-profile activism. She was 15 at the time. After the assassination attempt, her family moved to Britain and today, she lives in Birmingham, England. On Dec. 10, Malala became the youngest-ever recipient of a Nobel Peace Prize and the first Pakistani to become a laureate. She shares the award with 60-year-old Kailash Satyarthi of India, a dedicated children’s rights and anti-slavery campaigner.
Somewhere amid the morass of our modern culture of celebrity and consumerism, Malala has emerged as the real deal: an ordinary girl living through extraordinary circumstances, whose life has been characterized by honesty and courage. She didn’t seek out fame or celebrity, it found her. She hasn’t used it for her own gain, but rather to amplify her message for global education. It’s a reminder that celebrity doesn’t have to be so vacuous after all.
According to social anthropologist Jamie Tehrani of Durham University, our fixation with celebrity culture is a result of our poorly adapted brains. In a piece for the BBC, he argued: “As a hyper-social species, we acquire the bulk of our knowledge, ideas and skills by copying from others …” Yet, as he goes on to write, “while celebrities today get more attention and prestige than at any other point in human history, we are frequently being told not to hold them up as role models … What are celebrities for if they are not to be role models?”
Good question.
“Our age is lousy with celebrities,” wrote George Packer in the International Herald Tribune last year. In this modern era when mass media has artificially puffed up the power, influence and wealth associated with fame, it no longer matters what you are known for. Fame itself is the goal.
What do these famous-for-being-famous celebrities do? They move product. They make money. They sell us the illusion that we can be like them if we buy whatever they’re hawking. But their job is to remain apart, untouchable and godlike, to distract us from the humdrum of daily life. Ours is to worship, follow and fawn.
And then there are people like Malala Yousafzai who understand themselves as fundamentally part of the larger picture. They implore us to join them. “I tell my story not because it is unique but because it is not,” she said in her speech at the Nobel ceremony. “It is the story of many girls. Today, I tell their stories too.”
As we pick through the bones of 2014, let’s leave the celebrities who dazzled and scandalized us aside. Let’s highlight the ones who inspired us instead.
Iran Allows Afghan Refugees To Study At Iranian Schools
Iranian authorities have agreed to allow the children of illegal Afghan immigrants to attend Iranian schools and universities.
RFE/RL spoke on December 14 with Haji Muhammad Mohaqiq, Afghanistan's second deputy executive officer who recently returned from talks in Iran.
Mohaqiq said during his talks with Iranian officials, agreements were reached on providing free education for Afghan immigrants who still do not have legal residency in Iran and also on extending the residency permits for some Afghans who are legally registered in Iran.
Mohaqiq said there are more than 1 million Afghans living illegally in Iran.
There are also some 1 million Afghans living legally in Iran.
We are wasting our time and money in Afghanistan
http://www.buffalonews.com/
By Paul Lacapruccia
Billions wasted. Billions more to come in waste. That is how I can sum up the current efforts in Afghanistan. As U.S. forces draw down to 10,000 troops in Afghanistan, I wonder how many Americans know how much money we still spend there. I wonder how many Americans know how much of the money we spend there goes to lining the pockets of endemically corrupt officials. I wonder if we are all aware the Marshall Plan cost less.
When you’re in the Khyber Pass, on the busiest legal Afghani/Pakistani border crossing point, teaching Afghan border police how to find smugglers, you can have success. I watched Afghani officers I trained seize drugs and weapons using techniques my colleagues and I taught them. You can become optimistic (even when Taliban fighters attack your base several times a week) because you see a border crossing point improve as its individual officers improve. That is where optimism ends.
In Kabul, I watched the U.S. government throw money away in aid toward the Afghan Customs Department. This is not to say the U.S. aid money does no good, but it is ultimately in vain. The U.S. taxpayer and Western allies are slated to continue spending aid money in Afghanistan even as military forces draw down.
The Afghan government is supposed to meet revenue benchmarks in order to keep its funding from donor nations. However, Afghan officials have chosen to line their pockets rather than meet these benchmarks.
Customs revenue for the Afghan government, according to data from the Customs Department, was stagnant for the years 2009 to 2012 while overall trade rose some 20 percent. The implications are obvious. Customs officials, even Ministry of Finance officials, are stealing Afghan government revenue. We are wasting our time and money.
Afghanistan has hundreds of thousands of armed, uniformed service members who are paid with our aid money. Most of them are illiterate drug addicts. I know. I trained them. What do we think the end game will be when we finally shut off the aid money in this corrupt government? They have no real economy except the opium poppy. We might as well end it all sooner rather than later.
All troops should come home, other than those absolutely necessary to protect our diplomatic mission. All aid money should cease. Interpreters who worked for the U.S. military and contracting corporations should be given U.S. visas. These brave Afghans put their lives on the line daily for my colleagues and me. They need to be given what they were promised. But we need to leave as a country and leave now.
Paul Lacapruccia, of Buffalo, is a law student at the University at Buffalo and a former member of the Border Management Task Force training Afghan border guards.
How the Taliban groom child suicide bombers
By Dawood Azami
On a cold winter's day, a stream of relatives, neighbours and well-wishers come to see 10-year-old Naqibullah at his uncle's mud house in Pakistan's Balochistan province. They are happy to see him alive.
Naqibullah had mysteriously disappeared from the madrassa in Balochistan where he had been studying.
There were five months of silence until one day a neighbour watching an Afghan TV station recognised Naqibullah in a police "line-up" of insurgents captured in the southern Afghan town of Kandahar.
"I ran and told Naqibullah's uncle that I just saw him on TV and that he had been arrested for trying to carry out a suicide attack in Kandahar," neighbour Abdul Ahad said.
Naqibullah's story is an unsettling insight into how the Taliban and other militants groom child suicide bombers.
Identify the vulnerable
Afghans have a proud warrior tradition, but suicide attacks were never a part of it. They emerged as a regular deadly reality of Afghan life in 2005 - a tactic adopted from Iraq's theatre or war.
And children have suffered disproportionately in the Afghan conflict, where government and international forces have been fighting the Taliban since it was toppled in 2001.
Children have long been deployed for insurgent activities such as blowing up IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices), surveillance and information about the whereabouts and location of Afghan and Nato security forces and government officials.
Teenagers have been found dragging away wounded Taliban, collecting dropped weapons and even fighting. Afghan authorities say they have arrested up to 250 children over the past 10 years for such activities.
The disturbing regional twist is the increasing number of child suicide bombers. Children are recruited simply for being children.
The capacity of Afghan security forces has increased and adult suicide bombers find it increasingly difficult to hit their target. Children are seen as more "recruitable" - easily influenced to carry out an attack and rarely suspected by security forces.
Madrassas as recruiting grounds
Just like hundreds of thousands of other boys, Naqibullah's uncle - who cared for him since the death of his father - enrolled him into a religious school. Poor families in Pakistan and Afghanistan send their sons to such madrassas for free education and lodging.
Such madrassas are prime recruiting ground for Taliban groomers. Interviews with detained children reveal they are picked up from the streets as well and from low-income neighbourhoods.
In many cases, parents and guardians say they are totally unaware.
Girl recruits
There are extremely rare cases of girls being recruited.
One 10-year-old girl, Spozhmai, got international media attention when she was detained on 6 January 2014 in southern Helmand province. She said her brother tried to make her blow herself up at a police checkpoint.
In 2011, an eight-year-old girl was killed in central Uruzgan province when she carried remotely controlled explosives to a police checkpoint in a cloth bag.
Pakistan the training ground
More than 90% of juvenile would-be suicide bombers who have been arrested are "trained, lied to, and brainwashed or coerced in Pakistan", Afghan officials say.
But there is also evidence of training in Taliban-controlled parts of Afghanistan.
Last year, a father in Afghanistan's northern city of Kunduz handed over his teenage son to police.
"I did so because I feared [he] might have been radicalised when he disappeared for a few months," said the 50-year old man. His family had returned from Pakistan a year earlier.
Some have successfully carried out suicide attacks in Pakistan. One 12-year-old boy wearing a school uniform blew himself up killing around 30 in the town of Mardan in February 2011.
Promise of brighter future
Naqibullah says his handlers told him he would go to heaven and all his problems will end. Officials say children are offered a path out the boredom and drudgery of poverty by preachers with promises.
"They offer them visions of paradise, where rivers of milk and honey flowed, in exchange for giving up his life by becoming a suicide bomber," one official said.
Although confessions obtained from juveniles can sometimes be unreliable, they provide chilling accounts of how they were persuaded.
- They are told that Afghan girls and women are raped by "invading foreign forces" and that the Koran is being burned by Americans
- The children are told that it is their religious duty to resist the "infidel" coalition forces and that they and their parents will go to paradise
- They are told that the Afghans they intend to kill "deserve to die" because "they are not true Muslims", or are "American collaborators"
- Nevertheless, children are rarely told who their specific target is and why they deserve to die.
In some cases, they are simply lied to. Some were given an amulet containing Koranic verses and told it would help them survive. Some handlers gave children keys to hang round their necks and were told the gates of paradise will open for them
Taliban denials
There are of course international laws against the use of children in conflict.
According to the Article 1 of the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child, everyone under 18 is a child. Afghan law also forbids the recruitment of minors into armed forces or the police.
Taliban spokesmen usually deny using children, especially girls. Indeed all the three Laihas [Codes of Conduct and Regulations] issued after the fall of the Taliban regime in late 2001 prohibit youths with no beard to join their ranks.
But one Taliban official acknowledged that there may be violations by local commanders acting alone. For many the exact age is not important. Anyone beyond puberty and mentally sound is considered fit for fighting.
Rehabilitating children
According to Afghan security officials, more than 30 children accused of having links with the insurgency are still held at detention facilities.
Rehabilitation is complicated with scant resources. While some children go through rehabilitation steadily enough, according to one insider, a few even regret failing to carry out suicide missions.
Naqibullah describes what happened to him: "They kept me in the other madrassa for a few months. Then other men came and took me to Kandahar.
"One day they took me in a car, gave me a heavy vest to wear and pointed to [some] soldiers."
But the police stopped him before he exploded his vest and his handlers who were looking on from a distance left in the car.
To secure his release his uncle contacted local tribal elders, religious scholars and lobbied Afghan officials.
Back at his home the boy tells every well-wisher how happy he is to have returned.
On a cold winter's day, a stream of relatives, neighbours and well-wishers come to see 10-year-old Naqibullah at his uncle's mud house in Pakistan's Balochistan province. They are happy to see him alive.
Naqibullah had mysteriously disappeared from the madrassa in Balochistan where he had been studying.
There were five months of silence until one day a neighbour watching an Afghan TV station recognised Naqibullah in a police "line-up" of insurgents captured in the southern Afghan town of Kandahar.
"I ran and told Naqibullah's uncle that I just saw him on TV and that he had been arrested for trying to carry out a suicide attack in Kandahar," neighbour Abdul Ahad said.
Naqibullah's story is an unsettling insight into how the Taliban and other militants groom child suicide bombers.
Identify the vulnerable
Afghans have a proud warrior tradition, but suicide attacks were never a part of it. They emerged as a regular deadly reality of Afghan life in 2005 - a tactic adopted from Iraq's theatre or war.
And children have suffered disproportionately in the Afghan conflict, where government and international forces have been fighting the Taliban since it was toppled in 2001.
Children have long been deployed for insurgent activities such as blowing up IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices), surveillance and information about the whereabouts and location of Afghan and Nato security forces and government officials.
Teenagers have been found dragging away wounded Taliban, collecting dropped weapons and even fighting. Afghan authorities say they have arrested up to 250 children over the past 10 years for such activities.
The disturbing regional twist is the increasing number of child suicide bombers. Children are recruited simply for being children.
The capacity of Afghan security forces has increased and adult suicide bombers find it increasingly difficult to hit their target. Children are seen as more "recruitable" - easily influenced to carry out an attack and rarely suspected by security forces.
Madrassas as recruiting grounds
Just like hundreds of thousands of other boys, Naqibullah's uncle - who cared for him since the death of his father - enrolled him into a religious school. Poor families in Pakistan and Afghanistan send their sons to such madrassas for free education and lodging.
Such madrassas are prime recruiting ground for Taliban groomers. Interviews with detained children reveal they are picked up from the streets as well and from low-income neighbourhoods.
In many cases, parents and guardians say they are totally unaware.
Girl recruits
There are extremely rare cases of girls being recruited.
One 10-year-old girl, Spozhmai, got international media attention when she was detained on 6 January 2014 in southern Helmand province. She said her brother tried to make her blow herself up at a police checkpoint.
In 2011, an eight-year-old girl was killed in central Uruzgan province when she carried remotely controlled explosives to a police checkpoint in a cloth bag.
Pakistan the training ground
More than 90% of juvenile would-be suicide bombers who have been arrested are "trained, lied to, and brainwashed or coerced in Pakistan", Afghan officials say.
But there is also evidence of training in Taliban-controlled parts of Afghanistan.
Last year, a father in Afghanistan's northern city of Kunduz handed over his teenage son to police.
"I did so because I feared [he] might have been radicalised when he disappeared for a few months," said the 50-year old man. His family had returned from Pakistan a year earlier.
Some have successfully carried out suicide attacks in Pakistan. One 12-year-old boy wearing a school uniform blew himself up killing around 30 in the town of Mardan in February 2011.
Promise of brighter future
Naqibullah says his handlers told him he would go to heaven and all his problems will end. Officials say children are offered a path out the boredom and drudgery of poverty by preachers with promises.
"They offer them visions of paradise, where rivers of milk and honey flowed, in exchange for giving up his life by becoming a suicide bomber," one official said.
Although confessions obtained from juveniles can sometimes be unreliable, they provide chilling accounts of how they were persuaded.
- They are told that Afghan girls and women are raped by "invading foreign forces" and that the Koran is being burned by Americans
- The children are told that it is their religious duty to resist the "infidel" coalition forces and that they and their parents will go to paradise
- They are told that the Afghans they intend to kill "deserve to die" because "they are not true Muslims", or are "American collaborators"
- Nevertheless, children are rarely told who their specific target is and why they deserve to die.
In some cases, they are simply lied to. Some were given an amulet containing Koranic verses and told it would help them survive. Some handlers gave children keys to hang round their necks and were told the gates of paradise will open for them
Taliban denials
There are of course international laws against the use of children in conflict.
According to the Article 1 of the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child, everyone under 18 is a child. Afghan law also forbids the recruitment of minors into armed forces or the police.
Taliban spokesmen usually deny using children, especially girls. Indeed all the three Laihas [Codes of Conduct and Regulations] issued after the fall of the Taliban regime in late 2001 prohibit youths with no beard to join their ranks.
But one Taliban official acknowledged that there may be violations by local commanders acting alone. For many the exact age is not important. Anyone beyond puberty and mentally sound is considered fit for fighting.
Rehabilitating children
According to Afghan security officials, more than 30 children accused of having links with the insurgency are still held at detention facilities.
Rehabilitation is complicated with scant resources. While some children go through rehabilitation steadily enough, according to one insider, a few even regret failing to carry out suicide missions.
Naqibullah describes what happened to him: "They kept me in the other madrassa for a few months. Then other men came and took me to Kandahar.
"One day they took me in a car, gave me a heavy vest to wear and pointed to [some] soldiers."
But the police stopped him before he exploded his vest and his handlers who were looking on from a distance left in the car.
To secure his release his uncle contacted local tribal elders, religious scholars and lobbied Afghan officials.
Back at his home the boy tells every well-wisher how happy he is to have returned.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)