Sunday, October 4, 2020

Video Report - These are the questions Dr. Sanjay Gupta wants Trump's doctors to answer

Video Report - Turkish law tightening rules on social media comes into effect

Video Report - Telecommuting more productive than office work – workplace guru | SophieCo. Visionaries

Video Report - #Azerbaijan #Armenia Armenia, Azerbaijan blame each other for civilian casualties

Opinion: The American People Need the Truth

The president is hospitalized. The public doesn’t need to know every detail, but they don’t deserve to be misled.

The American people deserve better than to be misled about the health of the president.

Several days into President Trump’s battle with Covid-19, even basic facts about his illness — when he was diagnosed, how high his fever climbed, what triggered his hospitalization — remain hard to come by. The White House is being evasive and secretive. That’s nothing new, nor is it unreasonable to withhold some sensitive information from the public.
But too often in the past few days, the administration has appeared to be actively misleading the American people. Administration insiders are expressing frustration that no one even among Mr. Trump’s own staff seems to know what is going on. Among the broader public, anxious speculation and wild conspiracy theories are multiplying. The unnerving impression is of a White House in chaos.
We wish the president — and everyone stricken with this horrible disease — a full and speedy recovery. Critical to the protection of the nation’s health, however, is an honest accounting of what’s going on.
Despite reassurances from the White House on Friday afternoon that Mr. Trump was experiencing only “mild symptoms,” he was transported to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center early that evening. The visit was pitched as a precautionary measure, but this requires an incredibly loose definition of “precautionary.”
The president, as later came to light, had a high fever on Friday and his blood oxygen levels dropped to the point that he was given supplemental oxygen. To get the situation under control, his medical team is hitting him with, among other measures, steroids and an experimental antibody treatment.On Saturday, Mr. Trump’s doctors assembled outside of Walter Reed for a news briefing, overseen by the White House physician, Dr. Sean Conley. Far from providing clarity, the spectacle was surreal. Dr. Conley delivered a sunny assessment that made it sound as though the president had popped out for a weekend spa getaway. He dodged questions about testing, Mr. Trump’s symptoms and whether the president had ever received supplemental oxygen.The briefing also created confusion about the progression of Mr. Trump’s illness. Dr. Conley suggested that the president’s disease had been diagnosed on Wednesday — a day earlier than originally thought, and before Mr. Trump attended a Thursday fund-raiser. Dr. Conley later issued a “timeline clarification,” saying he had misspoken.
Immediately after the briefing, Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff, painted a far grimmer picture: “The president’s vitals over the last 24 hours were very concerning and the next 48 hours will be critical in terms of his care,” Mr. Meadows said. “We’re still not on a clear path to a full recovery.”
Mr. Trump was furious with the negative comments, according to media reports. He issued upbeat comments through Rudy Giuliani, his friend and lawyer. A couple of perky tweets popped up on his Twitter feed. Early Saturday evening, a video of Mr. Trump was posted on Twitter. Wearing a dress shirt and suit jacket, he sat at a table and delivered a four-minute message of reassurance. “I think I’ll be back soon,” he predicted, offering thanks for all the good wishes he had received, praising his medical care and even doing a little low-key campaigning.
At Sunday’s briefing, Dr. Conley provided a bit more detail but continued his evasive maneuvers. He danced around numerous inquiries about precisely how low the president’s blood-oxygen levels had dipped on Friday and then again on Saturday, and he claimed not to know whether a second round of supplemental oxygen had been administered since Friday. Dr. Conley said that the president’s oxygenation issues had prompted doctors to start him on a course of dexamethasone, a corticosteroid aimed at reducing inflammation. But he dodged questions about what scans of the president’s lungs showed, saying only that there were “expected findings.” It is unclear what Dr. Conley meant.
Dr. Conley did address a question about why he had been untruthful about the president’s condition on Saturday. “I was trying to reflect the upbeat attitude that the team, the president, his course of illness has had,” he said. “I didn’t want to give any information that might steer the course of illness in another direction, and in doing so, you know, it came off that we were trying to hide something, which wasn’t necessarily true.”
There is a long history of misleading the public about a president’s health. Grover Cleveland’s White House lied about his cancer. Woodrow Wilson’s lied about his stroke. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s team covered up his deteriorating medical condition, and John F. Kennedy hid his chronic health problems for his entire presidency.
Today, information is hard to contain, and misinformation is too easily spread. Yet at the root of all of the things we must to do fight coronavirus is honesty. Honesty about where those who test positive have been and who they’ve seen is the only way that contact tracing works. Honesty about the science — what works in fighting the disease and what doesn’t — is how we best treat it in the human body. Honesty about how we can try to protect ourselves and our communities is a key to stopping the spread.
Efforts by the administration to manipulate the public fuel distrust and frustration. Moreover, Mr. Trump is not suffering from an infirmity particular to him. He has contracted a virus that has already killed more than 209,000 Americans. His refusal from the start to be straight with the public about the severity of this disease has made it harder for the country to get the pandemic under control, and an untold number of lives have been lost as a result.
However sick the president may be, the truth cannot be more harmful than the thick fog of confusion the White House has created. The American people are entitled to the truth.

 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/04/opinion/trump-coronavirus-news.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

Music Video - NAHEED AKHTAR - Aaye Mausam Rangeele Suhane

Imran Khan is proving that Pakistan’s state policy is to lie and Balochistan doesn’t exist

 

 

PM Imran Khan is concerned about Kashmir and Palestine but can't see atrocities against Baloch and Pashtuns in Pakistan.

It almost felt like Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan was stating the national policy of his country when he said at the start of his United Nations General Assembly speech that “non-use of or threat of unilateral force, self-determination of peoples, the sovereign equality and territorial integrity of States, non-interference in their internal affairs, internal affairs, international cooperations — all these ideas are being systematically eroded”.

Ironically, he was complaining about “the foundations of ‘world order’” being changed. It must be the state policy of Pakistan to lie.

Imran Khan continued his speech and, as expected, talked about the ‘injustices against Muslims and Islamophobia around the world’. However, he shamelessly ignored inhuman treatment of religious and ethnic minorities in his own country.

He showed ‘grave concern’ for Kashmir and Palestine while staying silent on the atrocities against Baloch and Pashtuns in Pakistan. He raged against India for the “killings of muslims with impunity” without providing a shred of evidence, even as he pushed under the carpet the systematic genocide of Baloch people by his own army, which he had publicly spoken about and ‘exposed’ before becoming the prime minister with the blessing of the mighty Pakistan Army.

Imran Khan admitted on many occasions that the Pakistan Army was bombing villages populated with women and children in Balochistan as it did in Bangladesh. This makes one think whether lying through the teeth is the state policy of Pakistan, which has led to the public believing in those lies and living in a world far away from reality.

This is the reason that you can find Pakistanis giving expert opinion on Kashmir, Palestine and Afghanistan while remaining completely oblivious about the happenings in their country and especially about crimes of their own army.

What do average Pakistanis know? 

A question to an average Pakistani reader: What comes to your mind when you read or hear the word “Balochistan”? The exotic landscape? The riches and minerals? Gwadar, the ‘future dubai’ and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)?

Do you think there are ‘estranged Balochies’ and ‘tribal sardars’ who do not allow development in their areas because they fear that ‘an educated and developed people will reject the medieval tribal system’? Or do you think more about the poverty-stricken people? The tales of missing persons and their crying families on the roads, in front of press clubs and at the doorsteps of government offices?

Your answer really depends on where you come from in Pakistan and your interest in the geopolitics of this region. For example, if you come from Lahore or some other metropolitan city of Punjab, chances are that you have either never heard about the Baloch missing persons and the agonies of their families or you ‘know’ that the missing persons are actually people who went into foreign countries and the recovery of their dead bodies is a result of intra-tribal conflicts in Balochistan.

BBC News conducted a survey in Punjab in 2014 where it asked random people on the streets if they knew Balochistan and if they could tell the names of any cities there. Most of the people had no clue about the geography, culture, language and people of Balochistan. Some of the top media persons and politicians too did not know the basic difference between Balochi (the language) and Baloch (the people).

A systemic operation

Who is to be blamed for this unawareness among the people from the largest province of Pakistan about Balochistan that covers almost half of Pakistan? Is it the lack of interest of people? But how can people be uninterested about a region that covers 50 per cent of their country and, more importantly, supplies natural gas to their kitchens, while the Baloch have to rely on firewoods?

One can easily put the blame on the media and news agencies for not giving coverage to the human tragedy that is taking place in Balochistan, and it will be true to some extent. Few journalists who do talk about Balochistan and its suffering are silenced through use of force. Attack on Hamid Mir and the brutal killing of Sabeen Mahmud are just a few examples.

The real reason behind the ignorance of the average Pakistani is the policies of state institutions that have been ruling the country since its inception, sometimes blatantly occupying the driving wheel and other times taking the back seat while still calling the shots. This does not automatically exempt the media and the politicians from the moral and legal duty of standing for truth but simply exposes the real culprits behind the curtain.

When it comes to Balochistan, this policy of keeping the Pakistanis, and to some extent the international community, in complete darkness and misleading them with disinformation is as old as the country itself.

This policy has been furthered after the assassination of Baloch leader Nawab Akbar Bugti in a military operation in 2006, in order to cover the real motive behind his killing and the brutalities against the Baloch populace that followed it.

Military operations in civilian areas get reported as ‘action against a handful of RAW agents’. For the Pakistani media, and by extension the average populace of the country, cases of enforced disappearances in Balochistan are just ‘people moving to foreign countries’ and the recovery of their mutilated dead bodies become the result of ‘intra-tribal fights within Baloch people’.

The betrayal of political class

The Pakistani politicians are equally responsible for furthering these propaganda statements for their temporary political power. They play at the hands of the security establishment while in power, and reveal bits and pieces of truth when they become useless to the same establishment.

One example is the Chaudhary brothers, who were part of the Pervez Musharraf dictatorship when Nawab Akbar Bugti was killed. It was later revealed that Bugti’s demands were justified and that killing him was wrong.

Same is the case with the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) government, which left no stone unturned to malign the political Baloch leadership and to paint the indigenous Baloch movement as ‘India-funded miscreants’. The PPP ministers who blamed the abduction of UN official John Solecki in 2009 on Nawab Brahumdagh Bugti, the successor of Nawab Akbar Bugti, later confessed in private gatherings that they did so on the behest of the security establishment that wanted to ‘get rid of Brahumdagh Bugti just like his grandfather’.

Nawaz Sharif is no different. Every time he is thrown out of the government, he “speaks up” for Balochistan and Musharraf to be brought to justice but forgets even the name of Balochistan when in power.

Social media and calls for justice

Things have started to change with the rise of social media. Now, more and more people are getting informed about the injustices being meted out to the people of Balochistan and human rights crises that are taking place there.

The plight of missing persons and their families in Balochistan is reaching a wider audience through social media and voices in their support are getting louder and louder. More importantly, social media has given a platform to the oppressed Baloch, Pashtuns, Sindhis and religious minorities — all those who have been suffering at the hands of the Pakistani security establishment — to be united and rise against the injustices.

The Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) of Pakistan Army has also launched its counter narrative campaigns against the voices of the oppressed people, which they shamelessly call ‘fifth generation warfare’. But these voices can no longer be silenced now.

It becomes the moral duty of every individual, whether a Pakistani or a member of wider international community, to not only become aware of the sufferings of Baloch and other people in Pakistan. They must stand on the right side of history by supporting their movement for justice and rights.

https://theprint.in/opinion/imran-khan-is-proving-that-pakistans-state-policy-is-to-lie-and-balochistan-doesnt-exist/515662/

Baloch Rights Activists Protest Atrocities By Pakistan, Remember Disappearance Of Activist Shabir

Baloch rights activists protested against Pakistani atrocities in Balochistan. October 4 commemorates the fourth year of the disappearance of Baloch student leader, Shabbir Baloch who was arrested and disappeared on Oct 4, 2016, from Awaran, Balochistan.

Speakers; Karima Baloch, Lateef Johar, Zaffar Baloch, Tarek Fatah, and Hajan Kalhoro condemned human rights violations in Balochistan, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. They demanded the immediate release of Shabbir Baloch and all disappeared persons.

World Sindhi Congress and Pashtun Tahafuz Movement actively participated in the protest gathering in the Canadian city.

“#ReleaseShabirBaloch Toronto protest rally demanded an end to atrocities, political abductions & extrajudicial killings in #Balochistan #Sindh #Pakhtunistan #StopBalochGenocide . End Pakistani military occupation of Balochistan, Sindh and Pakhtunistan. #FreeBalochistan,” Zaffar Baloch, a Baloch activist, wrote on Twitter.

The activist further shared a video on Twitter with the message, “We have gathered here today to remember who Shabbir Baloch is and why he was taken away by the Pakistani army during an operation in 2016 in Balochistan. Shabbir Ahmed is a student of Balochistan University and the secretary of BSO Azad.”

His video message further added that the reason why the Pakistani authorities “had a problem” with the student leader was because “of his agitation, his demands” asking the rights of the Baloch people and Balochistan.

“The reason why the Pakistani authorities had a problem with Shabbir Baloch (was) because of his agitation, his demands that he was asking–from the authorities–for the rights of the Baloch people and the rights of Balochistan,” it added.

Shabir was allegedly abducted by the Pakistani Army on October 4, 2016, from Gowarkop and was attending a gathering the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) when the army conducted a raid at the place where a gathering was being held. Apart from Shabir, 29 others were also picked up.

Balochistan is a resource-rich but least developed province of Pakistan where a movement for freedom is ongoing for the past several decades. Many Baloch believe that the region was independent before 1947 and was forcibly occupied by Pakistan.
Pakistan Army has launched several operations in Balochistan and has supported criminals, which locals call “death squads”.

A large number of political activists, intellectuals, women and children in Pakistan’s Balochistan province are victims of enforced disappearances by the security agencies.

Many of them are languishing in detention centres whereas mutilated bodies of some of these abducted Baloch are found in isolated places. 

https://balochwarna.com/2020/10/04/canada-baloch-rights-activists-protest-atrocities-by-pakistan-remember-disappearance-of-activist-shabir/

Opposition's PDM: A storm on the horizon?

Mubasher Bukhari
@Bukharimubasher
Will the opposition be able to maintain its unity and momentum against the PTI government and the establishment?

Pushed to the wall by the government, opposition parties, especially the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), have finally decided to up the ante in their tussle with the establishment.

Though the outcome of this political battle is yet to be decided, both sides have chosen their strategies.

Talking to The News on Sunday, top PML-N leaders outlined their future course of action. “Nawaz Sharif will not return to Pakistan until he is physically fit and feels safe returning,” they said.

Addressing a party meeting on September 30, Nawaz Sharif too had hinted at not returning to Pakistan any time soon: “I am not prepared to live under the tyranny of certain people. We have to rid our country of their oppression.”

Meanwhile, the government has written to the British authorities, seeking Nawaz Sharif’s extradition. However, the UK government has reportedly declined the request on the grounds that most of the cases against the former PM appear to be politically motivated.

“The second decision is to launch Maryam Nawaz as the party’s top leader. Nawaz Sharif did not even take Shehbaz into confidence about the content of his speech at the Multi-Party Conference. He has ruled against his younger brother’s idea of avoiding confrontation with the establishment,” a party insider said.

“The PML-N will launch a mass mobilisation campaign, alongside the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) rallies. The first PML-N rally will be held at Gujranwala on October 16. The PDM will hold its first public rally in Quetta. If Maryam is arrested, Nawaz loyalists will continue their protest campaign,” said another PML-N stalwart.

The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) too expects that its principal leaders Asif Ali Zardari and Bilawal Bhutto might be arrested. “If this happens, we may bring Aseefa Bhutto to the field. She will be our trump card,” a PPP leader said.

On the other hand, the PTI has decided to launch a massive crackdown against the opposition parties. “The government has decided to handle the opposition parties with an iron hand. In this connection, Imran Khan has given a free hand to Punjab Chief Minister Usman Buzdar. The recent meeting between Buzdar and Punjab Assembly Speaker Chaudhry Parvez Elahi was meant to seek the latter’s support for the campaign,” a PTI source said.

Most of the top leaders of the PML-N, the PPP and Jamiat Ulama-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) face accountability cases.

Following the September 20 MPC, there have been a lot of developments. Shehbaz Sharif has been arrested in a money laundering case and arrest warrants have been issued for his wife and daughter by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). Asif Zardari and his sister Faryal Talpur have been indicted in corruption cases. The NAB also issued a notice to Maulana Fazlur Rehman. It was, however, withdrawn after he threatened to storm the NAB offices.

A highly informed source says that Prime Minister Imran Khan is in no mood to accommodate the opposition. “The powers that be had advised the PM to go slow, but he is not prepared to take that advice. He has also been advised recently to replace Buzdar who has been unable to deliver good governance. However, the PM has said he would not do so.” “The establishment is thinking differently and is not satisfied. They fear that it will become harder for them to support the government in the near future on account of its rigidity. The government’s failures on the administrative front are another factor behind their disappointment.”

On October 1, posters in support of the army chief and the intelligence chief appeared in Islamabad. Those have apparently been put up by a civilian. However, opposition parties claim that the government is behind this move.

As matters head towards a dramatic confrontation, the political calm of only a month ago appears unbelievable in hindsight. Then, Nawaz Sharif and his daughter Maryam Nawaz were silent and PPP’s Asif Zardari and Bilawal Bhutto spoke in a more measured tone. Maulana Fazlur Rehman seemed to be the only vocal critic of the government trying unsuccessfully to convince other opposition parties to make common cause with him against the government.

The Multi-Party Conference has proved a political game-changer. Speeches by former president Asif Ali Zardari, former PM Nawaz Sharif and Maulana Fazlur Rehman are being seen as a declaration of war against the government.

In his address Zardari said: “We don’t want to derail the system. We want restoration of democracy in the country.” Zardari, known for his political acumen, also predicted: “I might be the first one to go to jail after the conference. I will request Maulana Fazl to visit me; I will be waiting for him.” However, it was Nawaz Sharif who stole the show through his speech via video link. “I am not targeting Imran Khan but those who have installed him by rigging the elections. The practice of stealing people’s mandate must stop.”

Such statements, coupled with the strongly-worded joint declaration issued at the end of the conference, were seen as a direct challenge to the PTI and the establishment. The resulting Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) has the potential to rival the Movement for the Restoration of Democracy (MRD), launched during Gen Zia’s regime and the Alliance for the Restoration of Democracy (ARD) during Gen Musharraf’s era. It is ironic that a democratic movement has now been launched against an elected government. It is probably because opposition parties increasingly believe that the establishment is micromanaging the current government and it is time to demand a stop to the increasing interference in political affairs.

Soon after the APC, the army spokesman reiterated that military leaders were not interfering in politics. Several government ministers then joined the chorus of criticism of the opposition.

As matters head towards a dramatic confrontation, the political clam that prevailed only a month ago appears unbelievable in hindsight. Nawaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz had been silent and Asif Zardari and Bilawal Bhutto spoke in a more measured tone. Maulana Fazlur Rehman was then the only one trying to convince other opposition parties to make common cause with him against the government.

In a bid to undermine the opposition’s anti-establishment narrative, Federal Minister Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed broke the news that only recently some PML-N leaders had held meetings with the establishment. He also stated that several ministers were in contact with the opposition over proposed legislation on the status of Gilgit-Baltistan.

The disclosure dented the narrative of the opposition parties and their credibility. Analysts and supporters of the opposition parties also sought justification for the secret meetings with military leaders. The government also reacted the same way and called the MPC a group of corrupt people trying to avoid the accountability process.

It appears that the opposition’s objective is to get rid of the PTI government before the Senate elections in March. The coming days can thus be tough for the government. Their biggest challenge is to hold the local government elections in the Punjab without losing face. Some PTI leaders have advised the government to delay the local elections, sensing that the PML-N will win a lot of seats. They believe that the government should instead focus on chipping away at the PML-N and PPP strength in the provincial assemblies.

Given the circumstances, the most important question is: will the opposition be able to maintain its unity and momentum?

Already, PML-N’s Khawaja Asif has expressed his apprehensions about the PPP and stated that he does not trust Zardari. Nawaz Sharif, however, has distanced himself from the statement. “It is Asif’s own point of view and has nothing to do with the party’s mindset. I respect Zardari and trust him.”

Talking to the TNS, Senator Pervaiz Rasheed, a PML-N stalwart, said: “The nation is watching how Imran Khan is using the NAB against his political opponents. He is violating all political ethics. Some of the courts are also acting his tool.”

To a question about the future of the PDM and opposition unity, he said: “All parties in the PDM strongly believe that there should be rule of law in accordance with the constitution, supremacy of the parliament and unadulterated democracy in the country. I don’t think that anybody will back out. If any party backs out, it will be answerable to the democratic people of Pakistan.”

To a question about the possibility of arrests of PML-N leaders and the future campaign, he said: “Even if all our leaders are arrested, PML-N workers will launch the movement.”

Pakistan Peoples Party’s Punjab chief Qamar Zaman Kaira said: “We appreciate Nawaz Sharif for his speech. What he is asking for now is a decades-old demand of the PPP. We have been demanding supremacy of the parliament as enshrined in the constitution. We demand that all [national] institutions work within the limits defined by the constitution.”

“The army chief’s statement that army will not interfere in politics is music to our ears. We wish his words come true, but it will only be possible if the constitution is strictly followed by all including the army and the judiciary,” said Kaira. “We don’t want any confrontation with a national institution. Our fight is for the supremacy of the parliament.”

About the future of the PDM, he said: “In 2006, the PPP and the PML-N signed the Charter of Democracy. Despite having several differences, the two parties implemented 90 percent of the clauses of the CoD. Now, these forces would ensure implementation of the joint declaration of the APC.” The PPP and the PML-N have both committed mistakes in the past but they have learned from them and made CoD a success, he added.

Nawaz Sharif’s seriousness about the movement can be judged from the recent activities of his party and his fiery address to the meeting of PML-N central executive committee and council on two consecutive days. The present political tussle between the opposition and the government is expected to peak in the coming two months.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/723448-a-storm-on-the-horizon

کراچی یکجہتی ریلی نفرت ، لسانیت اور تقسیم کی سیاست کے خلاف عوامی ریفرنڈم تھی ۔



 پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کے رہنماؤں نے کہا ہے کہ کراچی یکجہتی ریلی نفرت ، لسانیت اور تقسیم کی سیاست کے خلاف عوامی ریفرنڈم تھی ۔سندھ کے دارالحکومت کراچی والوں نے سندھ کی تقسیم کو مسترد کر دیا ہے، اورتصب کی سیاست کو دفن کر دیا ہے ، پیپلز پارٹی بلدیاتی انتخابات میں کراچی سمیت صوبے بھر سے کامیابی حاصل کرکے عوام کا مقدمہ لڑے گی ، کراچی کی ریلی احتجاج کی ابتداء ہے ، اگر ہم نے سندھ بھر میں احتجاج کی کال دی تو عوام حکمرانوں کے خلاف سڑکوں پر ہوں گے، کراچی یکجہتی ریلی صرف پیپلز پارٹی کا اجتماع ہے ، جب 11 جماعتیں یکجاء ہو کر سڑکوں پر طاقت دکھائیں گی تو حکمرانوں کی نیند حرام کر دیں گے ، ،پیپلز پارٹی کو کچی آبادیوں میں رہنے والوں پر فخر ہے ، جو آئین اور جمہوریت کی سربلندی کے لیے جانیں قربان کرنے کی پرواہ نہیں کرتے ۔ ان غریبوں کی تیسری نسل پیپلز پارٹی کے پلیٹ فارم سے اپنے حقوق کی جنگ لڑ رہی ہے کراچی پر قبضہ کرنے کی خواہش کرنے والے اب یہ خواب دیکھنا چھوڑ دیں ۔ ان خیالات کا اظہار پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کے رہنماؤں نثار احمد کھوڑو ، سعید غنی ، وقار مہدی نے کراچی یکجہتی ریلی کے اختتام پر صدر میں ریلی کے شرکاء سے خطاب کرتے ہوئے کیا ۔

 اس موقع پر پیپلز پارٹی کے رہنما جاوید ناگوری ، پروفیسر این ڈی خان ، سینیٹر تاج حیدر شہلا رضا ، سردار خان ، ذوالفقار قائمخانی ، آصف خان ، ڈاکٹر شاہدہ رحمانی ، سینیٹر انور لعل ڈین ، مرزا مقبول ، امان اللہ محسود ، ظفر صدیقی ، اقبال ساند ، جاوید شیخ ، لیاقت آسکانی ، خلیل ہوت اور دیگر بھی موجود تھے ۔ قبل ازیں پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کراچی ڈویژن کے تحت کراچی یکجہتی ریلی عائشہ منزل فیڈرل بی ایریا سے نکالی گئی ۔ ریلی کے شرکاء شاہراہ پاکستان ، کریم آباد ، الکرم اسکوائر ، لیاقت آباد فلائی اوور ، لیاقت آباد ڈاکخان ، تین ہٹی ، جہانگیر روڈ ، گرومندر ، مزار قائد ، پیپلز سیکرٹریٹ ، لائنزایریا سے ہوتی ہوئی صدر پارکنگ پلازہ پہنچی ۔ ریلی کے شرکاء کا جگہ جگہ پرجوش استقبال کیا گیا جبکہ ریلی کے روٹ پر آنیوالی پلندو بالا عمارتوں ، فلائی اوورز ، پیڈسٹن برج اور استقبالیہ کیمپوں سے ریلی کے شرکاء پر پھولوں کی پتیاں نچھاور کی گئیں ۔ پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی سندھ کے صدر نثار احمد کھوڑو نے خطاب کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ کراچی کو سلام پیش کرتا ہوں کہ انہوں نے نفرت ، لسانیت اور سندھ کی تقسیم کو مسترد کر دیا ہے ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ سندھ کے دارالحکومت کراچی والوں نے سندھ کی تقسیم کو مسترد کر دیا ہے ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ پیپلز پارٹی کراچی کے حقوق کی جنگ لڑے گی اور کراچی کے حقوق پر کسی کو ڈاکہ نہیں مارنے دیں گے ۔ قائد اعظم محمد علی جناح نے کبھی تقسیم کی بات نہیں کی ۔ 

سندھ کی تقسیم کی بات کرنے والوں نے اردو بولنے والوں کی تین نسلیں تباہ کر دیں ، انہوں نے کہا کہ مجھے تو شرم آتی ہے کہ کراچی پر قبضہ کرنے کی خواہش کرنے والے یہ خواب دیکھنا چھوڑ دیں اور ہوش کے ناخن لیں ۔ اس شہر کے لوگوں نے ہمیشہ محبتیں بانٹی ہیں مگر وہ پاکستان بنانے والے سندھ صوبے کو تباہ کرنا چاہتے ہیں اور سندھ کو تقسیم کرنا چاہتے ہیں ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ کراچی والے سندھ کو تقسیم کرنے اور لسانیت کی سیاست کو مسترد کردیں گے ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ وزیر اعظم خود میانوالی سے ، عثمان بزدار جنوبی پنجاب سے جیت کر حکمرانی کرتے ہیں اور پیپلز پارٹی کو طعنہ دیتے ہیں کہ یہ اندرون سندھ سے جیت کر کراچی پر حکمرانی کرتے ہیں ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ جنرل مشرف نے طاقت کے بل بوتے پر جب کالا باغ ڈیم بنانے کی کوشش کی تو ہم نے ان کا بھی مقابلہ کیا ۔ کراچی کی حق تلفی نہیں ہونے دیں گے اور نہ سندھ تقسیم کرنے دیں گے ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ کراچی کی ریلی احتجاج کی ابتداء ہے ۔ اگر ہم نے سندھ بھر میں احتجاج کی کال دی تو عوام حکمرانوں کے خلاف سڑکوں پر ہوں گے ۔ انہوںنے کہاکہ سندھ دھرتی ماں ہے ۔ اس کا تحفظ کریں گے اور مخالفین سے کہتے ہیں کہ ماں پر بری نظر مت ڈالو ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ ملک کی ترقی ، خوش حالی ، مہنگائی کی ماری عوام کا مقدمہ پیپلز پارٹی لڑتی رہے گی ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ پیپلز پارٹی کے بانی ذوالفقار علی بھٹو کو راستے سے ہٹایا گیا ۔ گولیاں ، جبر ، تشدد ، پھانسیاں ہمارا راستہ نہیں روک سکیں ۔ طاقت کے باوجود ہمیں عوامی جدوجہد سے روکا نہیں جا سکتا ۔ انہوں نے کہاکہ پیپلز پارٹی کو کچی آبادیوں میں رہنے والوں پر فخر ہے ، جو آئین اور جمہوریت کی سربلندی کے لیے جانیں قربان کرنے کی پرواہ نہیں کرتے ۔ ان غریبوں کی تیسری نسل پیپلز پارٹی کے پلیٹ فارم سے اپنے حقوق کی جنگ لڑ رہی ہے ۔

 انہوں نے کہا کہ لسانیت ، فرقہ واریت ، اور تقسیم کی سیاست سے بالا تر ہو کر بلاول بھٹو کی قیادت میں عوامی حقوق کی جنگ لڑیں گے ۔ انہوں نے ریلی کے شرکاء سے عہد لیا کہ جب بلاول بھٹو احتجاج کی کال دیں گے تو کیا وہ اس پر لبیک کہیں گے جس پر ریلی کے شرکاء نے ہاتھ بلند کرکے اور پرجوش نعرے لگا کر یکجتی کا اظہار کیا ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ یہ تو صرف پیپلز پارٹی کا شو ہے ۔ جب11 جماعتیں یکجاء ہو کر سڑکوں پر طاقت دکھائیں گی تو حکمرانوں کی نیند حرام کر دیں گی ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ پیپلز پارٹی الیکشن چوری نہیں کرتی ۔ ہم عوامی طاقت کے بل بوتے پر اقتدار تک پہنچتے ہیں ۔ پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کراچی ڈویژن کے صدر سعید غنی نے کہا کہ کراچی یکجہتی ریلی تقسیم کی سیاست ، لسانیت اور نفرت کے خلاف نکالی گئی ریلی میں شریک ہر امن پسند شہری نے یہ پیغام دیا کہ وہ سندھ کی تقسیم کو مستر د کرتے ہیں اور کراچی سے لسانیت کا خاتمہ چاہتے ہیں ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ ہم وزیر اعظم کے اس مفروضے کو غلط ثابت کریں گے کہ پیپلز پارٹی والے اندرون سندھ سے جیت کر کراچی پر حکمرانی کرتے ہیں ۔ سعید غنی نے کہا کہ وزیر اعظم یہ بات کس منہ سے کرتے ہیں۔ کیا وہ خود میانولی اور عثمان بزدار جنوبی پنجاب سے ، محمود خان سوات سے جیت کر نہیں آئے ۔ 

اگر انہیں اسلام آباد ، لاہور اور پشاور میں بیٹھ کر حکمرانی کا حق ہے تو پیپلز پارٹی کے لیے کراچی میں حکومت کرنا جرم کیوں ہے ۔ انہوں نے کاہ کہ کراچی کے لوگوں نے وزیر اعظم ایم کیو ایم اور کراچی میں نفرتوں کی سیاست کو پروان چڑھانے والوں کو واضح جواب دے دیا ہے ۔ انہوں نے کہاکہ آج کی پرامن ریلی جس میں ہر زبان ،مذہب اور قوم سے تعلق رکھنے والے شریک تھے انہوں نے کراچی میں امن کا پیغام دیا ہے اور بتا دیا ہے کہ سندھ کی تقسیم ہم کسی صورت نہیں ہونے دیں گے اور نہ کسی کو کراچی کا امن خراب کرنے دیں گے ۔ ہم کسی کو لسانیت کی سیاست نہیں کرنے دیں گے ۔ ہم وزیر اعظم کے بیان کی پرزور مذمت کرتے یں ۔انہوں نے کہا کہ کراچی کے لوگ اسی طرح نفرت کی سیاست کو دفن کرنے کے لیے اپنا کردار ادا کرتے رہیں گے ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ کراچی یکجہتی ریلی سندھ کے خلاف سازش کرنے والوں کے لیے نوشتہ دیوار ہے ۔ کسی بھی قومیت، زبان یا ملک کے کسی بھی حصے سے کراچی میں آبادہونے والے محب وطن ہیں۔سندھ میں رہنے والے تمام لوگ سندھی ہیں۔ پیپلز پارٹی کی ریلی نے لسانی سیاست کی سازش کو ناکام بنادیا ہے، کامیاب ریلی میں شریک تمام قومیتوں اور زبانیں بولنے والوں نے سازشوں کو ناکام بنادیاہے ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ سندھ کے خلاف سازش کرنے والوں کے خلاف پیپلز پارٹی کی ریلی عوامی ریفرنڈم ثابت ہوئی ۔ پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی سندھ کے سیکرٹری جنرل وقار مہدی نے کہاکہ کراچی یکجہتی ریلی نفرت ، لسانی سیاست کے خلاف ریفرنڈم تھی ۔ آئندہ بلدیاتی انتخابات میں پیپلز پارٹی کراچی سمیت صوبے بھر سے نمایاں کامیابی حاصل کرے گی ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ پیپلزپارٹی وفاق کی سیاست کرتی ہے ۔ لسانیت کی سیاست ملکی یکجہتی کے خلاف ہے ۔کراچی والے قومی دھارے کی سیاست کرتے ہیں ۔ کراچی کوقومی سیاست سے الگ کرنے کی سازش ناکام ہوگئی ہے ۔ کراچی کی ترقی کا سفر شہید ذوالفقار علی بھٹو نے شروع کیا ۔ سابق وزیراعظم ذوالفقار علی بھٹو نے 1970 میں کراچی کی ترقی اور بس منصوبوں کے لئے پروگرام پیش کیا تھا ۔


https://www.ppp.org.pk/pr/23862/ 

Saturday, October 3, 2020

Music Video - Lewis Capaldi - Someone You Loved

Video - #Colbert #ALateShow #Monologue A Very Unusual Friday And A Very Unexpected Friday Late Show

#WearADamnMask - What Happens If Trump Is ‘Unable’ to Govern

By Cass R. Sunstein 

 A crash course in the 25th Amendment, from someone who was in the Justice Department when Reagan was shot.
Now that President Donald Trump has tested positive for Covid-19, the Department of Justice is almost certainly focusing on the 25th Amendment, which provides for the transfer of presidential authority to the vice president.
No one who works for a sitting president wants to think about that amendment. But in any administration, worst-case scenarios get attention, and if the president is sick, the lawyers and the vice president have to be clear on what the 25th Amendment says and requires.
The good news is that for most imaginable health outcomes associated with the virus, it is entirely clear. The less good news is that for some imaginable health outcomes, especially those associated with Covid-19, the 25th Amendment is ambiguous.
It offers two different routes by which the transfer of power can occur. Section 3 says this:
Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
Section 4 says this:
Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Under section 3, the president voluntarily transfers power to the vice president. Under section 4, the decision is made by the president’s own team – by majority vote.
Section 4 also allows a role for Congress. If power has been transferred to the vice president, the president can produce a written declaration that he is well and can become president again – unless the vice president and a majority disagree. In the (unlikely) event of disagreement, Congress resolves the issue, with the president prevailing unless both houses vote, by a two-thirds margin, that he cannot discharge the powers and duties of his office.
In 1981, I was a young lawyer in the Office of Legal Counsel of the Department of Justice, and I saw the operation of these provisions in real time. My boss, Theodore Olson, had asked me, very early in Ronald Reagan’s presidency, to become the resident expert on the 25th Amendment.
I thought it was a hypothetical exercise (and pretty pointless). But when John Hinckley shot Reagan, Olson quietly called me aside and told me that the president was in worse shape than the press was reporting. He told me to write two declarations, transferring power to Vice President George H.W. Bush. Both were sent over to the White House.
Fortunately, Reagan recovered well, and no one needed to invoke the 25th Amendment.
For that reason, we didn’t need to focus on a crucial unresolved question: the meaning of “unable,” which is the amendment’s most important word.
As everyone knows, people who test positive for Covid-19 have a continuum of symptoms. These can include essentially nothing; mild flu-like systems; serious but not life-threatening unpleasantness for a week or two; heart problems; severe respiratory problems requiring hospitalization; and worse.
That means that for 25th Amendment purposes, the Department of Justice’s analysis is mostly straightforward. The purpose of the amendment is to handle just one problem: incapacitation.
If the president has mild flu-like symptoms, or anything in that vicinity, the 25th Amendment should not and cannot be invoked. If the president is essentially flat on his back and unable to do his job (realistically speaking), the 25th Amendment must be invoked. That is not discretionary. If he is capable of doing so, he himself must sign the declaration required by section 3; if he cannot, the vice president and the cabinet must proceed under section 4.
Unfortunately, we can also imagine hard cases. The course of Covid-19 is unpredictable, and for some of its symptoms, people can reasonably disagree about whether it renders its victims “unable” to do their jobs. Symptoms that involve extreme fatigue, headaches and cognition could present borderline cases. It’s highly unlikely, but we cannot rule out a situation in which the president refuses to sign a declaration under section 3 but in which the vice president and the cabinet are compelled to proceed under section 4.
For anyone who gets Covid-19, including the president, there is a good chance that the disease will not prove incapacitating. If so, we will have no need to worry about the 25th Amendment. But it’s essential to understand what it makes clear, and what it leaves open.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-10-02/what-happens-if-trump-is-unable-to-govern?sref=2o0rZsF1&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&cmpid%3D=socialflow-twitter-view&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_content=view&__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true

#WearADamnMask - The president’s personal agony is also a moment of deep national reckoning

Geoffrey Kabaservice
Before he went into hospital, we saw Donald Trump as seldom seen – sombre, scared. The country he leads is facing its own demons
Impending death, as the saying goes, has a way of focusing the mind. There’s no reason to believe President Trump faces imminent death as a result of his recently testing positive for the coronavirus.
But the brief video he released before he went into hospital showed a Trump we’ve rarely seen before: sombre, scared and, perhaps for the first time, truly shaken by the pandemic’s threat to both the nation and himself. It’s conceivable that this momentous new development in the US presidential race, just a month from election day, could restore a seriousness to our politics that it has lacked for quite a while.
Exhibit A in the unseriousness of American political life has, of course, been our tragically inept response to the pandemic. Not all of the blame can be pinned on the Trump administration. The coronavirus has demonstrated a widespread breakdown in national competence that has become increasingly evident since the end of the cold war, which likely will receive further confirmation when we prove ourselves incapable of conducting a successful election next month.
Trump’s opponents have some justification for considering his contracting the coronavirus to be karmic retribution But Trump’s distinctive contribution to our cack-handed response to this pandemic has been to politicise the public health measures to combat it. His irresponsible pursuit of partisan advantage over the national interest led him to downplay the threat of the virus, to demand a premature return to business as usual, to ignore social distancing at his public rallies and to mock wearing a mask as somehow weak and un-American.
Trump’s opponents have some justification for considering his contracting the coronavirus to be a kind of karmic retribution. Bu fortunately, most prominent Democrats and Never Trumpers understand that the presidency as an institution, as opposed to any particular individual who occupies the White House, is too important to the nation’s security and wellbeing to be completely a matter of partisan politics.
Most have also refrained from publicly indulging in the kind of schadenfreude that will only deepen our tribal divisions. Joe Biden hit exactly the right note with his message wishing the first couple a speedy recovery and his campaign’s suspension of negative advertising.
It’s distantly possible that Trump, after what I pray will be his complete recovery, might return to campaigning with a new maturity brought on by being forced to confront his mortality. He might issue a bipartisan call for mask-wearing and social distancing and for taking the pandemic out of politics.
No one seriously expects this of Trump, however, even though such a course would be the most likely to give him a rally-around-the flag bump in popularity. As Biden observed in the last debate, Trump is who he is.
It’s far more likely that Trump will boast that his recovery is a tribute to his personal strength and shows that the coronavirus is, as he has said on many occasions, not much worse than the flu. And, given that his admission to hospital will take him off the campaign trail at the very moment when he most needs to narrow his polling gap with Biden, the likelihood of his defeat will increase his desperation. That in turn makes it likelier that he will try to sabotage the legitimacy of the election.
But if the virus can’t change Trump, perhaps it can have a sobering effect on a critical mass of Americans who, for too long, have regarded politics merely as cheap entertainment and the venue for the expression of culture war grievances. Just as Trump has not been a saviour for his supporters, removing him from office will do little in itself to arrest the reality of American decline.
Vladimir Putin has claimed that the breakup of the Soviet Union was the “greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century,” but hindsight may show America’s victory in the cold war as the prelude to a greater tragedy. The end of the cold war at least deprived the US of the desire to live up to its image as the leader of the free world and the national unity needed to pursue that end.
Perhaps it will have a sobering effect on a critical mass of Americans who have regarded politics as cheap entertainment There was a time when it would have been a matter of deep and widely shared national embarrassment that the US, which makes up 4% of the world’s population, should account for 20% of all Covid-19 deaths. There was a time when the country that saw itself as the beacon of global democracy would have undertaken the kind of reforms needed to conduct a national election during a pandemic.
The lukewarm enthusiasm of most of Biden’s supporters, in sharp contrast to their passionate determination to oust Trump, is an indication of political maturity. The fact that few of them expect Biden to be a saviour indicates a wider understanding that the responsibility for reversing our national decline rests with the American people. Some of this same understanding has glimmered, however faintly, with those of Trump’s supporters who have been forced by his illness to think about the possibility of his defeat or even his incapacitation or death.
Just as the pandemic has touched every part of the country, the problems driving our national decline extend to both red and blue America. The solutions will have to come from the same kind of national mobilisation, skill at practical problem-solving and facility for governance and political compromise that allowed the country to win a world war, put a man on the moon and extend the benefits of peace and prosperity to much of the globe.
P
erhaps Trump’s illness will, in hindsight, be seen to have provided a much-needed national wake-up call.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/03/the-presidents-personal-agony-is-also-a-moment-of-deep-national-reckoning

#WearAMask #WearAMaskSaveALife - Trump’s Diagnosis Is a Wake-Up Call for Americans Forget the snark. Just wear a mask.

 By Nicholas Kristof

The first thing to say is simple: Best wishes to President Trump and the first lady for a speedy recovery from Covid-19.
After the announcement that they had tested positive for the coronavirus, I tweeted that I hope we can all remain civil, avoid snark, seek lessons and wish the Trumps a swift recovery. The result was an outpouring of gloating and snark — one person responded that “my thoughts and prayers go out to the virus.”
Let’s think about that. One of my objections to Trump has been the way he has eroded norms that underpin this country — like accepting election outcomes, respecting science and acting in a respectful way to opponents. If we decry such behavior and hope that the election can begin a period of national healing and recovery, then don’t we uphold norms best by modeling them?
A second point is also straightforward: Let’s learn from the president’s infection. Let’s make this a wake-up call that leads to mask-wearing and social distancing, saving lives.
The United States has lost 208,000 people to the pandemic in part because we as a country didn’t take the virus seriously. We’re seeing a rise in new infections, which now exceed 40,000 a day, roughly twice the level of early June, and many epidemiologists warn that it will most likely get worse. One reason for the uptick in numbers is increased testing, but another is simply that people in the United States and all over the world are suffering pandemic fatigue.
We’re sick of isolation. We crave human contact. We want hugs. We are social animals, and the virus exploits that instinct.
I’m now in Oregon, and I sense that we are all becoming more lax, particularly in parts of the country where the virus never hit hard and people didn’t lose friends or see refrigerator trucks parked outside hospitals. That laxity is lethal.
The Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation predicts that 363,000 Americans will have died of Covid-19 by Jan. 1. That would amount to more Americans dying in nine months from the virus than the total number of combat deaths over four years in World War II.
Yet the institute’s model also suggests that if 95 percent of Americans just wore masks (the level in Singapore), then nearly 100,000 lives could be saved between now and the end of the year.
Think about that. As a country, we’re still seared by the nearly 3,000 deaths in the 9/11 attacks. But the institute’s model warns that by the end of December, we’ll be losing that many each day.
Larry Brilliant, an epidemiologist who early in his career helped eradicate smallpox, argues that we can crush this virus as well. We’ve seen the toolbox that other countries employed to do so: universal mask use, social distancing, testing, contact tracing and so on.
We as a country have the tools and we have the resources; what we lack is the will. Dan Patrick, the lieutenant governor of Texas, suggested that he and other grandparents would prefer to die rather than take measures against the virus that would disrupt the economy. Uncovered protesters rampage through stores without masks, shouting “Take off your mask,” “It’s all a lie,” and “Take it off.” Store and restaurant employees have been shot by customers angered at requests that they wear masks.
Mask-wearing lags in the United States compared with some other countries, particularly among men. A poll suggests that many American men see mask-wearing as wimpish, “a sign of weakness.” Likewise, some Americans seem to believe that avoiding masks is a measure of freedom.
No, it’s a measure of decency, altruism and responsible behavior. But note that one should avoid masks with valves (which are less protective of other people) and use the mask to cover one’s nose as well as one’s mouth. And it’s profoundly unhelpful to remove one’s mask when speaking.
Strangely, many of those who denounce masks are also those who claim to believe in “personal responsibility” yet don’t understand that going without a mask is just like driving while drunk.
Sure, most of the time when you go without a mask, you won’t infect anybody, just as most of the time if you drive while tipsy, you won’t crash your car. Every day some 300,000 people drive while intoxicated, and they kill about 10,000 people a year — which pales beside the 100,000 who the modelers believe will die in the next three months because of reckless Americans who won’t wear masks.
Drunken driving, like mask avoidance, is largely male; three times as many men as women are arrested on charges of driving drunk. But we have been able to change norms and stigmatize drunken driving, while also nurturing new norms even about tasks that people find yucky, such as picking up dog poop. Perhaps the shock of Trump’s infection gives the United States an opportunity to build a new national norm about wearing masks.
It’s extraordinary that mask-wearing is even controversial, considering that masks were used more than 100 years ago to mitigate the influenza pandemic of 1918 (although there was resistance then, too). A review of 172 studies in The Lancet found that face masks significantly reduce virus transmission, and one recent study estimated that state mask mandates (covering about half the American population) might have averted 230,000 coronavirus infections.In one study published this year, researchers placed hamsters with the coronavirus in cages next to those without the virus. When surgical masks were placed between the cages, infections fell by more than half.Asia’s success in combating the virus — in Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Japan, Vietnam and Thailand — appears to be a result in part of people’s willingness to wear masks. Crowded Hong Kong, for example, has a per capita death rate from Covid-19 only one-45th the rate of the United States, and Dr. Kwok-Yung Yuen, an infectious disease specialist there, told me the reason is straightforward: 97 percent of Hong Kong residents wear masks.
Even without a vaccine, Dr. Yuen said, a country can get the pandemic under control if people simply wear masks consistently for four weeks.
One encouraging real-world experiment unfolded in May. In Missouri, two hair stylists were found to have Covid-19, but they and their 140 customers had worn masks — and even though they were in close contact, not one tested positive.
Masks also protect jobs and our national economy. Goldman Sachs estimated that a national mask mandate could substitute for lockdowns that would shrink the economy by 5 percent.
Joshua Lederberg, a renowned geneticist and Nobel Prize laureate, argued that in the struggle against new diseases, “it’s our wits versus their genes.” So far we’ve bungled the fight and lost 208,000 Americans as a result. So as the Trumps battle the virus, let’s learn lessons, sharpen our wits — and commit ourselves to a lifesaving norm of social distancing and wearing masks.

Video - #NayaDaur #Pakistan Media Censorship, And PDM's Plan Of Action

#Pakistan #PPP - Federal govt should refrain from interfering in GB elections: Bilawal Bhutto

 


Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, while presiding over the meeting of Parliamentary Board on Gilgit-Baltistan elections, said that PTI is synonymous with rigging, it should refrain from interfering in the Gilgit-Baltistan elections.

He said that Gilgit-Baltistan is a geographically important region and all possible steps should be taken to make its election fair and transparent. There will be no tolerance for rigging as election meddling in such a sensitive region will be a national security risk.

Chairman PPP said that people of GB love PPP and they have always shown their respect through public mandate, as they will in the coming elections.

He directed all candidates to spread PPP’s manifesto door to door in all the districts of Gilgit-Baltistan and in their respective constituencies so that the people could cast their valuable votes to strengthen the relationship between the party and the region.

He further said that in the coming elections, PPP will contest under its 2018 manifesto, which clearly states that PPP will make Gilgit-Baltistan an interim province and take steps to make this a reality.

 https://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/566931-Federal-govt-refrain-GB-elections-Bilawal

OP-ED - #Pakistan - Dual Citizenship: Violation of the Oath

Jamil Mogul
Recently, in Pakistan, a dual citizenship concern or issue has become a hot-button topic of conversations or discussions in the electronic/TV or print news media and been covered in op-ed write-ups. There are those who defend dual citizenship as a personal preference for traveling more easily and hassle-free to a native country and/or as a needed means for taking an advantage of a political appointment opportunity in the native country’s government. But there are others who are ardently opposed to dual citizenship on moral, ethical, or legal grounds while pointing to an oath of allegiance taken by an immigrant to become a naturalized citizen of an adopted country.
To become a naturalized citizen of America, an immigrant takes an oath of allegiance in a citizenship-oath ceremony by raising the right hand and is sworn in to renounce any allegiance to a foreign country (i.e. the country of origin) and to support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies (the text of the U.S. citizenship oath is available online).
Those who defend the dual citizenship may give examples of certain Western officeholders who were or are dual citizens. But this does not mean that what these officeholders have done is ethically or legally right. It is because when they took an allegiance oath, these officeholders violated their previous oath of allegiance to their former country while not renouncing simultaneously or priorly their original or former citizenship. Also, when they pledged another allegiance to the constitution and laws of a second country, the first country of their citizenship should have taken a notice of their oath violation, not the second country. As an example, it has been reported that the former governor of California (U.S.A), Arnold Schwarzenegger, retained his dual citizenship of Austria and America while serving in office. Well, possibly, this matter of oath violation was (or is) between him and Austria, not between him and the U.S.A, though he might be perceived to be disloyal by ethical or law-abiding people who know the contents of the U.S. citizenship oath. Hence, it is advisable to follow principles, not people as examples who are often found to be wrong or misguided.
In an op-ed that I read, a defender of dual citizenship has asserted that people who staunchly support single citizenship only are zealots or patriots who seem to ask for a test or show of loyalty. But these days in this modernity, there is practically no such thing as a loyalty test, nor is it necessary to exhibit loyalty by wearing a nationality on forehead or carrying a flag or reciting an anthem. (These three seemingly sarcastic phrases were essentially said by the op-ed writer in a response to my comments on the op-ed). With regards to a country, loyalty which is an inner matter that has to do with sincerity (and fairness) is required solely for honoring the oath of citizenship so the country that relies on its citizens can be defended or supported in the time of a conflict or crisis. Also, labeling law-abiding or ethical people as single-citizenship zealots is uncalled for and unfair, frankly speaking. These people, as I mentioned above, seem to point out a violation of an allegiance oath on moral, ethical and/or legal grounds.
This defender of dual citizenship has alluded in the op-ed that a second citizenship is like a first citizenship and hence should not require any oath of allegiance or swearing-in. But a second citizenship is not like a first citizenship. With regards to America, a first citizenship is associated with a natural citizen who was naturally born in America and who does not seem to have been required to take an oath to be a U.S. citizen, while a second citizenship is related to a naturalized citizen who is an immigrant (and who took an oath to become a U.S. citizen). Also, a naturalized citizen can be de-naturalized and possibly deported if a fraud had been committed and was later uncovered in the immigration visa application. Moreover, a U.S. immigrant who committed a felonious crime would be permanently barred from obtaining a U.S. citizenship—a second citizenship. This immigrant, in this case, would remain forever as an alien U.S. resident holding a Green Card (alien resident card) or Permanent Resident Card only.
For a first citizenship, an oath of loyalty to a country is not necessary for a person who was naturally born on the land of the country of the citizenship (on the native land that figuratively gave birth to the person), just like it is not necessary for a person to take an oath of loyalty to the person’s natural mother or father. In both cases, the person is naturally expected to be loyal or obedient. On the contrary, in either case, a person would be a rebel to the mother or father if the person demonstrated disobedience, or a traitor to the country if the person demonstrated disloyalty.A person with a dual nationality who has a U.S. passport and who later officially decides to be loyal, in every aspect, to the native country or to the country of origin must renounce the U.S. nationality and surrender the U.S. passport. Otherwise, this person would be in violation of the U.S. citizenship oath if the U.S. passport is still used for traveling to the United States or to other visa-free countries allowed by holding the U.S. passport.
In certain cases in Pakistan, when they were sworn in or they pledged an allegiance to the Pakistan Constitution and laws, the Pakistani officials with a dual nationality broke the other country’s oath of allegiance that they had taken previously, or these officials were being evasive in Pakistan. In other words, their swearing-in or pledge invalidated their prior allegiance to the constitution or laws of the other (adopted) country. So, these officials who still carry and use the passport of the adopted country are either disloyal to the adopted country or insincere to Pakistan; and as such, obviously, these officials are potentially traitors. Therefore, it is incorrect to say, “Dual nationals are not traitors.”
Another issue with certain naturalized citizens—with a dual nationality or even a single nationality—is their relentless refusal to integrate into the Mainstream society of their adopted country, culturally or socially. A large majority (70% to 90%) of naturalized citizens originally from Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, and Arab and Islamic countries seems to be culturally, mentally, and/or emotionally attached to their country of origin. They often socialize only with those people who are from their own country of origin while they misconstrue and denigrate the culture or society of the adopted country in a hostile manner, especially if the adopted country is a Western country (just like, they often used to say anti-West things in their country of origin). They usually watch TV programs of their own country of origin; and they get any news about the adopted country from the electronic/TV news media based in their own country of origin. They keep to themselves and they often do not know, nor do they interact with, their next-door neighbor who is Western. Simply speaking, they work in the adopted country, but they mentally live in their own country of origin. In other words, they have diligently sought and gotten the citizenship papers and insensitively taken the benefits of and/or availed themselves of the opportunities in the adopted country, but they have rejected the adopted country’s Mainstream society, which is not fair to the adopted country that has provided them with all the economic, academic, professional and/or business opportunities, and financial and other benefits and a better quality of life with advanced facilities.
Additionally, certain naturalized citizens still literally associate themselves with their country of origin. For an example, Over 90% of naturalized American citizens originally from Pakistan still call themselves Pakistanis or “Overseas Pakistanis”, not Americans (but occasionally, they call themselves Pakistani-Americans for a personal or political expediency); and they consider themselves as pure Pakistani nationals with a desire or demand to participate in voting during elections in Pakistan; and surprisingly, the “Overseas Pakistanis” were (and are) allowed (to break their oath of allegiance to their adopted countries) by the Election Commission of Pakistan to cast their votes online, just like the Pakistani nationals in Pakistan. This, I am sorry to say, seems so strange (and unsettling), from my American perspective.
In America, except for the indigenous Indians (who are correctly called Native Americans), all the other peoples are immigrants or descendants of immigrants from countries all over the world. Just like Pakistani-Americans, there are generationally British-Americans, Scottish-Americans, Irish-Americans, German-Americans, Italian-Americans, French-Americans, Polish-Americans, Norwegian-Americans, Swedish-Americans, Danish-Americans, Dutch-Americans, Swiss-Americans, and etc. But all of them gave up the hyphenation and integrated—culturally and socially melted together—to form a different culture (an American culture) and a diverse society (a Mainstream American society) with an American English containing American slangs, idioms, vernaculars and accents, and model civic values that are a beacon of individual liberty, freedom, and democracy for other countries to potentially or possibly follow the civic values. And they call themselves Americans.
So, like the other naturalized American citizens originally from UK and Europe, the Pakistani-Americans who call themselves Pakistanis or “Overseas Pakistanis” must learn from their fellow Americans and integrate culturally and socially into the Mainstream American society and also give up the hyphenation and call themselves just Americans. In addition, they must be sincere and fair to America; and most importantly, they must honor the oath of the U.S, citizenship by being loyal to America and by having only one passport—the U.S. passport. No dual citizenship so as to stay true to the oath of allegiance.
https://dailytimes.com.pk/673744/dual-citizenship-violation-of-the-oath/

Pakistan-Turkey-Azerbaijan Trilateral Partnership Emerges As A Big Threat To Armenia

Published: January 23, 2020

Pakistan has augmented its ties with both Turkey and Azerbaijan in recent years. At the same time, the process of the establishment of trilateral cooperation between Turkey and Azerbaijan and Pakistan commenced sometime in 2017.
The article attempts to assess Pakistan–Turkey, Pakistan–Azerbaijan and Pakistan–Turkey–Azerbaijan cooperation and the possible impact of that partnership on the Karabakh conflict settlement process.
Pakistan – Turkey
Pakistan and Turkey established a high-level military dialogue mechanism in 2003. Adding a brand new chapter to their relations, in May 2019, they upgraded their military and strategic relationship. And since Pakistani PM Imran Khan’s visit to Ankara in January 2019, the two countries’ defence relations have been getting stronger and are firmly on an upward trajectory.
Facing constraints in updating the F-16s provided by the US for its air force, Pakistan asked Turkey for help. Filling the vacuum left by Washington, Istanbul came to the rescue and helped upgrade a batch of 41 F-16 fighter jets for the Pakistan Air Force and has become Pakistan’s second-biggest arms supplier after China.
Up until now, the most important defence deal between Islamabad and Ankara has been the procurement of four MILGEM Ada-Class Corvettes for the Pakistani Navy, while the largest-ever defence contract has been the sale of 30 Turkish T129 ATAK helicopters to Pakistan for $1.5 billion. In 2017, Turkey had purchased 52 MFI-17 Super Mushshak training planes from Pakistan.
From being Islamabad’s lone supporter when Pakistan was being put on the “grey list” by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in 2018, to being one of the main and most regular participants in Pakistan’s International Defense Exhibition and Seminar (IDEAS), Ankara remains one of Islamabad’s most reliable ally.
With efforts from both sides, Turkey’s export to Pakistan increased from US$ 155 million in 2008 to a whopping US$ 352 million in 2017. Turkey has always stood beside Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir on all possible forums. Pakistan has supported the Turkish stance on tensions with Greece and Cyprus.
Not limited to products and defence capabilities, Turkey and Pakistan are also training their troops to meet any unforeseen challenge together. With regards to this, six-day exercises between Turkish, Pakistani and Uzbek armies were conducted in April last year in eastern Uzbekistan. Called the Partnership Shield 2019, these drills simulated terrorist infiltrations in a country.
One of the most serious issues faced by Pakistan-Turkey relations ensuing from the 2016 military coup attempt in Turkey was Pak-Turk schools which were set up as part of a global network by Fetullah Gülen. In early 2019, the Supreme Court of Pakistan declared the Gülenists a terrorist outfit and ordered that Pak-Turk schools be handed over to the Maarif Foundation – an Islamic school organization established by the Turkish government to counter Gülenist influence.
Pakistan – Azerbaijan
Pakistan was one of the first countries to recognize Azerbaijan as an independent state in December 1991. The bilateral strategic cooperation between two states embraces the economic, cultural, political, and especially defence fields.The two countries had inked a defence agreement in May 2003. As a part of the agreement, Azerbaijan’s naval personnel participated in the biggest Pakistan-led multinational exercise, AMAN-2013, held in March 2013 in the Arabian Sea. Beyond this, the two countries have engaged in continuous dialogue at high-level meetings.
Pakistan is the only state in the world that does not recognize Armenia as an independent state because of the Karabakh conflict and fully supports the Azerbaijani position. Meanwhile, Baku “fully supports the settlement of the Kashmir problem based on the relevant resolutions of the UN Security Council,” as President Ilham Aliyev stated during his meeting with the then PM of Pakistan Nawaz Sharif in Azerbaijan in October 2016.
In October 2018, a delegation of Pakistani Armed Forces visited Azerbaijan to discuss bilateral military cooperation. This growing defence cooperation between the two states is based on a protocol on bi-lateral military cooperation signed on March 31st, 2015, which finally led to the signing of the “Book of Honour” on November 24th, 2017.Baku is interested in the growing expansion of military ties with Islamabad. Pakistan can offer Azerbaijan Anza-II anti-aircraft missiles, anti-tank missiles, Mushak aircraft, and related hardware. Azerbaijan is actively discussing the possibilities of buying the JF-17 Thunder (also known as the FC-1 Xiaolong), a multi-functional aircraft that was jointly developed by Pakistan and China.The mutual defence ties were discussed during March 2019 Azerbaijani defence Minister Colonel-General Zakir Hasanov’s visit to Pakistan. The parties focused on the development of cooperation in the field of security, as well as military, military-technical, military-educational and other spheres.
Pakistan – Turkey – Azerbaijan Trilateral Cooperation
Pakistan – Turkey – Azerbaijan trilateral cooperation was officially launched in November 2017 when Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov held meeting with his counterparts from Turkey and Pakistan, Mevlut Cavusoglu and Muhammad Asif, in Baku.
According to Mammadyarov, sides agreed to increase trade turnover, support each other in international organizations and intended to multiply partnership in the defence sphere. The three countries have all had defence-related agreements in the past with each other, and now looking towards creating a trilateral format of defence cooperation.
In the declaration adopted after the meeting, the ministers expressed their contentment with the existing bilateral cooperation among their countries based on the strategic partnership, mutual respect, and trust and reconfirmed their mutual respect and strong support for independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of international borders of states.
The declaration also underscored the significance of trilateral cooperation in energy and trade among three countries, as well as the development of transport infrastructure highlighting the importance of trilateral cooperation to enhance rail, road and air connectivity.
Ramifications for Armenia
Since the end of the hostilities in Nagorno Karabakh in May 1994 Armenian game plan on Karabakh conflict has been based on two key pillars – Armenia and the Nagorno Karabakh Republic should be able to deter Azerbaijan by itself.
Simultaneously, Armenia should develop a strategic partnership, including guarantees on mutual defence, with Russia to prevent Turkey from any direct involvement in the potential new war over the Karabakh.The deployment of the Russian military base in Armenia, Armenia’s membership into the Collective Security Treaty Organization and later into the Eurasian Economic Union is based on this logic. This policy justified itself in 1993, during the active phase of hostilities in Karabakh when Turkey made a public threat to attack Armenia. However, there was a strong warning from Russia that this might spark World War III.However, the defence partnership between Azerbaijan and Turkey including the acquisition of military hardware and the education and training of Azerbaijani officers in Turkish military universities is the source of permanent concern for Armenia. During their education, Azerbaijani officers participate in the operations against Kurdish PKK forces which gave them combat experience.
Armenia seeks to counterbalance it through membership into the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) which gives Armenia the advantage to buy Russian weapons by “significantly reduced prices”. Meanwhile, it should be mentioned that in recent years the key provider of modern assault armament to Azerbaijan was not Turkey, but Israel and Russia.
Israel has provided approximately US$ 1.5-2 billion weapons to Azerbaijan including drones and anti-tank guided missiles, while Russia sold Azerbaijan multiple launch rocket systems such as Smerch and Hurricane (Uragan), modern T-90 tanks, S–300 air defence systems worth of US$ 5 billion.
However, the key task for Yerevan is not to prevent the sales of weapons from Turkey, Israel or Russia to Azerbaijan but to keep military balance with Baku, simultaneously using its strategic alliance with Russia as an effective tool to prevent Turkey’s direct military involvement in case of a new wave of hostilities in Karabakh.
There is no widespread debate in Armenia at both state and expert levels regarding the possible direct or indirect participation of Pakistan in the revival of hostilities in Karabakh or in general concerning Pakistan’s negative impact.
Nor Azerbaijan–Turkey–Pakistan trilateral neither Azerbaijan–Pakistan bilateral defence partnership is among the key topics discussed in Armenia. The fact that Pakistan is the only state which does not recognize Armenia as an independent state definitely creates enmity towards Pakistan.
However, in Armenian strategic thinking, Pakistan is not perceived as a significant threat worthy of deterrence. There can be no comparison between the perception of the threat level of Turkey and Pakistan. Islamabad is not viewed as an actor involved in the South Caucasus geopolitics. Pakistan is perceived as a hostile state but with a little real capacity to harm Armenia.
https://eurasiantimes.com/pakistan-turkey-azerbaijan-trilateral-partnership-emerges-as-a-big-threat-to-armenia/