Sunday, October 3, 2021

Video - #Colbert #Comedy #Monologue Let's Not Reward Congress For Doing The Bare Minimum

Video Report - #DailyShow #TrevorNoah What Happens When a State Bans Abortions? - If You Don’t Know, Now You Know | The Daily Show

Video Report - Jim Acosta: Far-right is behind its own 'great replacement' theory

Video Report - #PostDocs #PandoraPapers What are the Pandora Papers?

Video Report - #PandoraPapers #OffshoreDataLeak - Pandora Papers: Biggest offshore data leak exposes leaders' hidden wealth

Music Video - Lokan Do Do Yaar Banaye = Afshan Zebi

Video Report - #Afghanistan #Taliban #KabulMosqueBlast Several killed in blast outside Kabul mosque

80 ہزار گھر اجڑنے پر آواز اٹھانے والی پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی… زندہ باد




حکومتی ترجمان اور میڈیا میں موجود ’سرکاری تجزیہ نگار‘ تسلسل سے مسلم لیگ (ن) میں بیانیہ کی بنیاد پر پیدا ہونے والے
 اختلافات کو پارٹی کے لئے مہلک قرار دیتے ہوئے پیش گوئی کرتے رہتے ہیں کہ یہ پارٹی انتخابات سے پہلے ہی کئی حصوں میں بٹ جائے گی۔ یہ تو غیر واضح ہے کہ بیانیہ کا اختلاف مسلم لیگ (ن) کے لئے کس قدر مہلک ثابت ہوتا ہے لیکن انتہاپسندی کے بارے میں ملک کی سب سے بڑی اپوزیشن پارٹی کی خاموشی ضرور یہ بتا رہی ہے کہ مسلم لیگ (ن) کی سیاست شدید اور سنگین خطرے سے دوچار ہو سکتی ہے۔ اگست میں افغانستان پر طالبان کے قبضے کے علاوہ اب وزیر اعظم عمران خان کی طرف سے تحریک طالبان پاکستان کے ساتھ مذاکرات کا اعلان اور یہ فیصلہ کہ ہتھیار پھینکنے والے دہشت گرد عناصر کو حکومت پاکستان عام معافی دے گی یعنی وہ انسانوں کے خلاف ہلاکت خیزی کے سنگین جرم سے بری ہوجائیں گے اور انہیں عام شہریوں کے طور پر زندہ رہنے اور سہولتوں سے استفادہ کرنے کا موقع دیا جائے گا۔ 

یہ دونوں معاملات پاکستان کی خارجہ پالیسی کے علاوہ ملکی سلامتی، سماجی اطمینان اور معاشی بحران کے حوالے سے انتہائی اہمیت رکھتے ہیں۔ افغانستان میں طالبان کے قبضہ کے بعد پیدا ہونے والی صورت حال میں وزیر اعظم عمران خان بھی یہ اعتراف کرتے رہتے ہیں کہ اگر امریکہ اور دیگر حلیف ممالک نے فوری طور سے افغانستان کی معاشی امداد بحال نہ کی تو یہ ملک شدید اقتصادی بحران کا شکار ہوجائے گا جس سے پاکستان براہ راست متاثر ہوگا۔ اس کے باوجود ملک سے صرف پیپلز پارٹی نے حکومت کی افغان پالیسی کے علاوہ تحریک طالبان پاکستان کو عام معافی دینے کے اعلانات پر احتجاج کیا ہے اور قومی اتفاق رائے پیدا کرنے کی ضرورت پر زور دیا ہے۔ مسلم لیگ (ن) اس وقت ملک کی سب سے بڑی اپوزیشن پارٹی ہے۔ پاکستان تحریک انصاف کے بعد یہی پارٹی سب سے بڑی ہے اور پنجاب میں تحریک انصاف کو انتخابی سطح پر چیلنج کرنے کا مسمم ارادہ رکھتی ہے۔ پارٹی کے صدر شہباز شریف اس وقت قومی اسمبلی میں اپوزیشن لیڈر ہیں جبکہ ان کے صاحبزادے اور پارٹی کے نائب صدر حمزہ شہباز پنجاب اسمبلی میں اپوزیشن لیڈر ہیں۔ اس کے باوجود افغانستان کے بحران، اس کے نتیجہ میں پیدا ہونے والی سیاسی و سفارتی بے چینی کے بعد اب پاکستان تحریک طالبان سے حکومتی مذاکرات اور اس گروہ سے متعلق دہشت گرد عناصر کو عام معافی دینے کے اعلانات پر مسلم لیگ (ن) کی قیادت مکمل طور سے خاموش ہے ۔ پارٹی نے ان اہم معاملات پر کسی قسم کا رد عمل دینا ضروری نہیں سمجھا۔ ملک کی اہم ترین اپوزیشن پارٹی کے اس رویہ سے یہی اندازہ کیا جاسکتا ہے کہ پارٹی ان دونوں معاملات پر کوئی خود مختارانہ رائے نہیں رکھتی اور حکومتی پالیسی کے بارے میں کسی قسم کے تحفظات کا اظہار ضروری نہیں سمجھتی۔ اس کے برعکس پیپلز پارٹی نے افغانستان پر طالبان کے قبضہ کے بعد پارلیمنٹ کو انگیج کرنے پر اصرار کیا تھا اور کہا تھا کہ اس بارے میں متوازن اور انسان دوست پالیسی اختیار کرنا ضروری ہے۔

 ترک ٹی وی کو انٹرویو دیتے ہوئے عمران خان نے تحریک طالبان پاکستان کے بعض عناصر کے ساتھ طالبان کی مدد سے افغانستان میں مذاکرات کا انکشاف کیا ہے۔ اس کے ساتھ ہی انہوں نے یہ بھی کہا ہے کہ اگر حکومت ٹی ٹی پی کے ساتھ کسی معاہدے پر پہنچی اور یہ لوگ ہتھیار پھینکنے پر آمادہ ہوگئے تو انہیں عام معافی دے دی جائے گی اور وہ عام شہریوں کے طور پر زندگی گزارنے کے مجاز ہوں گے۔ پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کے متعدد لیڈروں نے اس سرکاری پالیسی پر شدید رد عمل ظاہر کیا ہے اور مطالبہ کیا ہے کہ پارلیمنٹ کو اعتماد میں لئے بغیر اور اس اہم مسئلہ پر قومی مکالمہ کے بغیر حکومت کیسے ایک اہم مسئلہ پر یک طرفہ طور سے عام معافی کا اعلان کرسکتی ہے۔ یہ ایک جائز اور درست سیاسی مؤقف ہے جس میں نہ صرف حکومت کی کمزور حکمت عملی کی نشاندہی کی گئی ہے بلکہ یہ واضح کیا گیا ہے کہ ہزاروں پاکستانیوں کے قاتلوں کو معاف کرنے کا فیصلہ حکومت یا وزیر اعظم کسی سیاسی تنہائی میں نہیں کر سکتے۔ اگر یہ تصور کر لیا جائے کہ تحریک انصاف کی حکومت فوج کی سرپرستی میں مفسد عناصر کے ساتھ مکالمہ شروع کرنے اور انہیں معاف کرنے کا عندیہ دے رہے ہیں تو پیپلز پارٹی ہی کیوں اس خطرناک اور قومی مفاد کے برعکس فیصلہ کے خلاف آواز اٹھا رہی ہے۔ کیا ملک کی باقی سب سیاسی پارٹیوں کو اس طریقہ پر کوئی اعتراض نہیں ہے اور وہ قومی منظر نامہ پر دہشت گردوں کے ساتھ مفاہمانہ طرز عمل اختیار کرنے کے اثرات سے آگاہ نہیں ہیں۔ کیا ملک میں انتہا پسندی اور مذہبی بنیاد پر دہشت گردی صرف پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کا مسئلہ ہے۔ کیا یہ تصور کر لیا گیا ہے کہ پارٹی کی چئیر پرسن اور سابق وزیر اعظم بے نظیر بھٹو کی شہادت چونکہ ان عناصر کے ہاتھوں ہوئی تھی، اس لئے پیپلز پارٹی انفرادی ناراضی کی وجہ سے ٹی ٹی پی کے خلاف سخت مؤقف اختیار کررہی ہے، اس کا وسیع تر قومی مفاد سے کوئی تعلق نہیں۔ اس قیاس کو درست مان کر ایک اہم قومی مسئلہ پر خاموشی اختیار کرنا خاص طور سے مسلم لیگ (ن) جیسی بڑی پارٹی کا ناقابل قبول سیاسی طرز عمل ہے۔ اس کی دوسری وجہ یہ ہو سکتی ہے کہ مسلم لیگ (ن) اسٹبلشمنٹ کی خوشنودی کے لئے اس معاملہ پر خاموش ہو۔ اس کا خیال ہو کہ اگر تحریک انصاف کی حکومت عسکری عناصر کی خوشنودی سے ایک ناخوشگوار سیاسی فیصلہ کرتی ہے تو مسلم لیگ (ن) بعد میں اس کا سیاسی فائدہ اٹھا سکے گی۔ اس حوالے سے بھی مسلم لیگ (ن) کا سیاسی طریقہ افسوسناک حد تک قومی حساسیات سے نابلد ہونے کا مظہر ہے۔ 

 اس ملک کے 80 ہزار گھروں میں تحریک طالبان پاکستان کی دہشت گردی کا نشانہ بننے والے شہدا کے وارث رہتے ہیں۔ ان لوگوں کا دکھ درد پوری قوم کا سانجھا المیہ ہے۔ اس دہشت گردی نے پاکستانی سماج پر گہرے اثرات مرتب کئے ہیں اور ملک میں مذہبی انتہا پسندی کو فروغ ملا ہے۔ تحریک انصاف کی حکومت بالواسطہ طور سے مذہبی انتہا پسندی کو راسخ کرنے کا سبب بنتی رہی ہے اور اب ٹی ٹی پی کو عام معافی دے کر مصالحت کا ڈول ڈال کر معاشرے میں تشدد کی طرف رجوع کرنے والے عناصر کی حوصلہ افزائی کا اعلان کیا جا رہا ہے۔ ملک کی اہم ترین اپوزیشن پارٹی اس پہلو پر رائے دینے اور حکومت کو دباؤ میں لانے سے گریز کررہی ہے۔ اس کی ایک واضح وجہ یہ بھی ہوسکتی ہے کہ مسلم لیگ (ن) بھی تحریک طالبان پاکستان کے بارے میں اسٹبلشمنٹ کو خوش کرنے کے علاوہ خود بھی مذہبی انتہا پسندی کے بارے میں وہی رویہ رکھتی ہے جس کا اظہار عمران خان کی حکومت کررہی ہے۔ ایسے میں پیپلز پارٹی کے علاوہ شاید اے این پی مذہبی انتہا پسندی کے خلاف دیوار بننے کی کوشش کرے۔ مسلم لیگ (ن) اور دیگر مذہبی و نیم مذہبی سیاسی جماعتیں تمام تر تباہی اور انسانی جانوں کے ضیاع کے باوجود مذہب کے نام پر قتل و غارت کرنے والے عناصر کے بارے میں نرم گوشہ رکھتی ہیں تاکہ آئندہ انتخابی مہم میں اسے اپنی ’اسلام دوستی‘ کے طور پر پیش کرکے عوام کے ووٹ اینٹھنے کی کوشش کرسکیں۔ ستم ظریفی یہ ہے کہ پاکستان جمہوری تحریک نامی اپوزیشن اتحاد میں پیدا ہونے والے اختلافات کے بعد مسلم لیگ (ن) نے پیپلز پارٹی اور آصف زرادری پر اسٹبلشمنٹ کی ’بی‘ ٹیم ہونے کا الزام عائد کیا تھا اور دعویٰ کیا تھا کہ نواز شریف کے ’ووٹ کو عزت دو ‘ والے بیانیہ کے مقابلہ میں پیپلز پارٹی نے عسکری عناصر کے ساتھ مل کر سیاسی اقتدار کی راہ ہموار کرنے کی سازش کی ہے۔ تاہم المیہ یہ ہے افغانستان کی صورت حال کے بعد اب ٹی ٹی پی کے حوالے سے مسلم لیگ (ن) نے جو رویہ اختیار کیا ہے وہ درحقیقت اسٹبلشمنٹ کو راضی کرنے کی اپنی سی کوشش ہی ہے۔ 

 مسلم لیگ (ن) میں نواز شریف اور مریم نواز نے خود کو ’اینٹی اسٹبلشمنٹ‘ لیڈروں کے طور پر پیش کر رکھا ہے۔ نواز شریف یہ دعویٰ کرتے رہتے ہیں کہ سیاسی معاملات میں عسکری قیادت کی مداخلت ہی دراصل ملک کے حقیقی مسائل کی بنیاد ہے۔ اس دو ٹوک اور دلیرانہ مؤقف کے برعکس شہباز شریف مصالحت اور مل جل کر چلنے کی بات کرتے ہیں۔ ان کی سیاست کی پہچان ہی یہ اصول ہے کہ اسٹبلشمنٹ کو چیلنج کرنے کی بجائے، اس کی شرائط مان کر سیاسی اصول متعین کئے جائیں۔ اسی لئے حال ہی میں کنٹونمنٹ انتخابات میں مسلم لیگ (ن) نے شہباز شریف کی قیادت میں ’کارکردگی کو ووٹ دو ‘ کا نعرہ متعارف کروایا اور پنجاب کی حد تک کامیابی حاصل کی۔ مریم نواز اس دوران خاموش رہیں اور ’ووٹ کو عزت دو‘ کی گونج بھی سنائی نہیں دی۔ ان حالات میں دیکھا جا سکتا ہے کہ نواز شریف بھی سیاسی فائدے کے لئے دراصل وہی طریقہ اختیار کرنا چاہتے ہیں جو شہباز شریف سے منسوب کیا گیا ہے لیکن جمہوریت کے پاسبان ہونے کا دعویٰ کرتے ہوئے اسٹبلشمنٹ پر دباؤ بڑھانے اور بہتر شرائط تسلیم کروانے کی کوشش کی جاتی ہے۔ یعنی اول و آخر یہ جمہور کی بالادستی کی بجائے سیاسی اقتدار کے حصول کی جنگ ہے۔ تاہم ملک میں گزشتہ دو دہائی سے خوں ریزی کا سبب بننے والے عناصر کے بارے میں پیپلز پارٹی کا کھرا مؤقف اور مسلم لیگ (ن) کی خاموشی سے نواز شریف کے سیاسی بیانیہ کی حقیقت کھل کر سامنے آ رہی ہے۔ 

اگر انتہا پسند عناصر کے ساتھ مفاہمت پر لین دین کرکے سیاسی اقتدار حاصل کرنے کی کوشش کی جا رہی ہے تو یہ ملک و قوم کے مستقبل کے لئے بری خبر ہے۔ لیکن یہ راستہ مسلم لیگ (ن) کی مقبولیت کے لئے بھی کوئی اچھی خبر ثابت نہیں ہوگا۔ ملک کے جو جمہوریت پسند عناصر نواز شریف کے واضح سیاسی مؤقف کی وجہ سے ان کا ساتھ دے رہے تھے ، وہ اب پیپلز پارٹی 
کو ہی پاکستان میں متوازن جمہوری و روشن خیال سیاست کی واحد امید سمجھنے پر مجبور ہوں گے۔

https://www.humsub.com.pk/423020/syed-mujahid-ali-1923/

Support to Taliban: How A US Senate Bill Might Spell Trouble for Pakistan

 DR TARA KARTHA @kartha_tara

A version of the bill will go ahead, even while influential Pakistani circles work all levers to water it down.

Pakistan is again at war, but this time in the United States. The trigger is a bill introduced by some 22 Republican Senators, titled the 'Afghanistan Counterterrorism, Oversight, and Accountability Act'.
Apart from underlining the disastrous withdrawal of US troops, the bill also intends to “impose sanctions on the Taliban and entities and countries supporting it”. That in itself is enough to create an “Uh Oh!” moment in Rawalpindi, basking in its victory in getting its proxies into power. But, there’s more and enough to cause consternation among the politicians as well, as the Karachi Stock index took a dive on the news.This, and other developments could mark a portent of things to come, with palpable anger in Capitol Hill at the extreme humiliation thrust on US troops.
The Senate Bill – Dealing With the Withdrawal
First, the comprehensive bill covers very many sensitive issues. Since its tabled by the Republicans, including by Mitt Romney who ran for President against Barrack Obama, it naturally has no reference to why US troops left at all. As one Senator put it “That ship has sailed”.It, however, does question the manner of withdrawal and the effects of it, calling for a State Department Task Force to concentrate on evacuation of American citizens and permanent residents. The number seems to have been at between 10,000-15,000 before the Taliban swept in. Just 6,000 were evacuated. That means there are many Americans who are in serious danger. Then there are the loyal Afghans who stood by the US and are now is serious danger.It must be reminded that all records of who did what are held by the Interior Ministry presided over by Sirajuddin Haqqani, a terrorist with a $5 million bounty on his head. It’s the worst possible outcome for all concerned, and the bill underlines that clearly and unambiguously.
The bill also recalls the Taliban “as a specially designated global terrorist under part 594 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations” and related laws. It then calls for a complete ban on the Taliban representatives being recognised at the UN General Assembly or in any other agency, with the US using its influence towards this.
The bill recommends sanctions against the Taliban, listing out its humanitarian obliviousness and its various acts of violence. In a separate section, it demands that the USG also provide details of not only all defence articles left behind by hastily withdrawn forces – which included 75,898 vehicles, 5,99,690 weapons, 1,62,643 pieces of communications equipment, 208 aircraft, and 16,191 pieces of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance equipment, several thousands of assault rifles and at least 20,000 grenades – but also a strategy to recover them.
That’s going to be tough, since it seems that a considerable amount would already have made it across borders, particularly into the weapons markets of Pakistan.
A whole section also demands clear counter-terrorism goals, and a call for an assessment of US ability to detect and counter-terrorist threats with an over the horizon capability. It is something which is lacking at the moment, and was made more than clear with the attack against an alleged Islamic State target that tragically turned out to be on an Afghan family. What is interesting for New Delhi, is the section on the region. That section calls for the president to report to an appropriate committee on not just what Russia and China are up to in these countries, but also on matters “including border disputes with South and Central Asian countries that border the People’s Republic of China”.
If that’s not enough, it goes on further to say that the US should identify areas of diplomatic, economic and defence cooperation with India to address the challenges posed by these countries, and an assessment of how it has affected India’s cooperation with the US” .
That’s pretty heavy language, and is in itself enough to make Rawalpindi hit the ceiling. But there's more, much more.
Pakistan in the Dock
An entire section is focused almost exclusively on Pakistan. The bill demands a thorough survey of all covert assistance given by that country from 2001 onwards, but more specifically the provision of sanctuary space, financial support, intelligence support, logistics and medical support, training, equipping, and most importantly, the tactical, operational, or strategic direction that emanated from Pakistan.That such direction was available was apparent from the military precision with which the entire campaign was conducted, including the show of hesitation in entering Kabul ostensibly to avoid casualties.
Interestingly, the bill would also make it mandatory for the US government to provide details on the Pakistani involvement in the Panjshir operation that not just killed civilians in the area, but also seemed to have involved use of foreign air support in the form of UAV flights. The bill makes it mandatory for the US government to also report what it did to ‘curtail’ such support. That answer would be just one word: Nothing.
Sanctions to Follow
Worse is to follow. The section on Sanctions demands that the USG similarly report to Congress on the “assistance provided to or through the government of any country or any organization providing any form of material support to the Taliban”. That means not just the government of Pakistan, but also the various bodies like the Madrassa Haqqania in Akora Khattak , as well all extremist organisations at present revelling in the Taliban victory and falling over themselves to reach Kabul.
This is followed by further details of sanctions on anyone providing paramilitary or military support, or intelligence or logistical support to the Taliban or any terrorist group operating – that last is interesting since it clearly has a broad sweep to include the Lahskar-e-Tayyba and its friends and affiliates. This particular clause is clearly related to Pakistan, and its intelligence agencies. Further are other clauses against drug trafficking, and related areas. Worse still, is the demand of stoppage of all foreign assistance to those entities or countries supporting the Taliban. Keep in mind that the US is still the largest aid donor to Pakistan, and you get the picture. The bill is in sum, not just a Republican repartee, but a synthesis of the frustration that is apparent as criticism mounts on the nature of US withdrawal, the victorious return of the Taliban, and the ‘in your face’ triumphalism evident in Islamabad.
That anger that cuts across party lines, and is made worse as Congress hears US Generals discuss the sorry details of the Afghan withdrawal Most unusually, commentaries are now being seen in the Washington press on the toxicity of the ‘ally’ that is Pakistan.
The bill is certainly at very early stages yet. However, it cannot be ignored in its entirety, since it raises very valid questions and requirements that relate not only to Pakistan, but the Afghan situation as a whole, and most vitally, the ability of the US to protect its homeland from the rising terrorist presence in Afghanistan. A version will go ahead, even while influential Pakistani circles work all levers to water it down. But it will gain pace, as the US grapples with the world wide loss of face that it has incurred in its hasty exit from a country that does not deserve the Taliban or its masters.
https://www.thequint.com/uttar-pradesh-elections/lakhimpur-kheri-violence-farmers-killed

#PandoraScandal - Prime Minister Imran Khan promised ‘new Pakistan’ but members of his inner circle secretly moved millions offshore

By Margot Gibbs and Malia Politzer
Leak shows a key ally tried to bypass tax authorities and political and military elites bought luxury apartments and set up shell companies.
In 2018, Imran Khan, the Pakistani cricketing legend turned anti-corruption campaigner finally broke through.
After more than two decades in the political wilderness, the charismatic Oxford-educated media star seized on the publication of the Panama Papers, the 2016 journalistic exposé that revealed the offshore secrets of the global elite. Among the findings: The children of Pakistan’s sitting prime minister secretly owned a string of luxury London apartments.
Riding a wave of public outrage, Khan led protests around the country and a sit-in at the residence of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, demanding that he step down. With the support of the military establishment, Khan propelled his reformist party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), or Pakistan Movement for Justice, past its rivals in the 2018 national elections and propelled himself into the prime minister’s office in Islamabad.
In a televised victory speech, Khan promised a new era.
“We will establish supremacy of the law,” he said. “Whoever violates the law, we will act against them. Our state institutions will be so strong that they will stop corruption. Accountability will start with me, then my ministers, and then it will go from there.”
Now leaked documents reveal that key members of Khan’s inner circle, including cabinet ministers, their families and major financial backers have secretly owned an array of companies and trusts holding millions of dollars of hidden wealth. Military leaders have been implicated as well. The documents contain no suggestion that Khan himself owns offshore companies.
Among those whose holdings have been exposed are Khan’s finance minister, Shaukat Fayaz Ahmed Tarin, and his family, and the son of Khan’s former adviser for finance and revenue, Waqar Masood Khan. The records also reveal the offshore dealings of a top PTI donor, Arif Naqvi, who is facing fraud charges in the United States.
The files show how Chaudhry Moonis Elahi, a key political ally of Imran Khan’s, planned to put the proceeds from an allegedly corrupt business deal into a secret trust, concealing them from Pakistan’s tax authorities. Elahi did not respond to ICIJ’s repeated requests for comment. Today, a family spokesman told ICIJ’s media partners that, “due to political victimisation misleading interpretations and data have been circulated in files for nefarious reasons.” He added that the family’s assets “are declared as per applicable law”.
In one of several offshore holdings involving military leaders and their families, a luxury London apartment was transferred from the son of a famous Indian movie director to the wife of a three-star general. The general told ICIJ the property purchase was disclosed and proper; his wife didn’t reply.
The revelations are part of the Pandora Papers, a new global investigation into the shadowy offshore financial system that allows multinational corporations, the rich, famous and powerful to avoid taxes and otherwise shield their wealth. The probe is based on more than 11.9 million confidential files from 14 offshore services firms leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and shared with 150 news organizations around the world.
The window into the personal finances of individual Pakistani generals is especially rare and provides a glimpse at how top military officers – known in Pakistan as “The Establishment” – use offshore to quietly enrich themselves while maintaining, until now, the military’s image as a bulwark against civilian corruption.
In the 48 hours leading up to the publication of the Pandora Papers, a Pakistani television station, ARY-News, reported that, “the owner of two offshore companies registered at a similar address as of Prime Minister Imran Khan has revealed that they were registered by him on a different address and denied any role of the premier in this regard.” The story also attributed the information to “a database of the offshore companies.” ARY-News is not an ICIJ partner and doesn’t have access to ICIJ data.
In its reporting prior to publication, ICIJ had asked Khan about the same companies. A Khan spokesman told ICIJ that the prime minister had no link to either, adding that two houses in the same neighborhood share an address, providing a map as evidence. The spokesman also told ARY-News that Khan denied any connection to the companies, adding that their owner “never met Imran Khan face to face and it may however be possible that they had attended an extended family function.”
The Pandora Papers investigation exposes civilian government and military leaders who have been hiding vast amounts of wealth in a country plagued by widespread poverty and tax avoidance.The newly leaked records reveal the use of offshore services by Pakistan’s elites that rivals the findings of the Panama Papers, which led to Sharif’s downfall and helped propel Imran Khan to power three years ago. Today, a few hours before the Pandora Papers’ publication, Khan’s spokesperson told a press conference that the prime minister, “has no offshore company but if any of his ministers [or] advisers have it will be their individual acts and they will have to be held accountable.”
An unaccountable military elite
Khan’s anti-corruption rhetoric resonated in Pakistan, where the military has pointed to what it calls the corruption and ineptitude of civilian politicians to justify overthrowing democratically elected governments three times since the country’s founding in 1947. Military autocracies have ruled Pakistan for almost half the country’s history. They have been bolstered by support from the U.S and NATO countries, which have relied on Pakistan’s support as a bulwark against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and, later, the Taliban.
The military also claims legitimacy as the nation’s protector against longtime adversary and nuclear rival India.
Over the decades, the military and its secretive spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence, have repeatedly stoked anti-India animus, even at the cost of angering Pakistan’s Western allies.
Foreign policy analysts have accused the military of playing a double game, receiving billions of dollars in U.S military support while continuing to work with members of the Afghan Taliban.
One legacy of colonial rule is the military’s wealth. The military’s combined business holdings amount to Pakistan’s largest conglomerate, and it controls 12% of the country’s land. Many of the landholdings are owned by current or former senior leaders.
The Pandora Papers reveal that in 2007, the wife of Gen. Shafaat Ullah Shah, then one of Pakistan’s leading generals and a former aide to President Pervez Musharraf, acquired a $1.2 million apartment in London through a discreet offshore transaction.
The property was transferred to Gen. Shah’s wife by an offshore company owned by Akbar Asif, a wealthy businessman who has opened restaurants in London and Dubai. Asif is the son of the Indian film director K Asif. The younger Asif once met with Musharraf at London’s Dorchester Hotel to ask for an exception to Pakistan’s 40-year ban on Indian films to allow the release there of one of his father’s most acclaimed movies. Musharraf granted the exception and later lifted the ban.
The leaked documents show that Asif has owned a multimillion-dollar property portfolio through a web of offshore companies.
One of those companies, called Talah Ltd. and registered in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), was used to transfer the London apartment to Shafaat Shah’s wife. Talah bought an apartment near the Canary Wharf financial district in 2006. The next year, Asif transferred ownership of the company to Fariha Shah.
Asif’s sister, Heena Kausar, is the widow of Iqbal Mirchi, a senior figure in a leading organised crime group, D-company. Mirchi was at the time under sanction as a drug trafficker by the U.S. Before his death in 2013, Mirchi was one of India’s most wanted men.
Gen. Shah told ICIJ that the purchase of the London apartment had been made through a former army colleague then acting as a consultant to London real estate firms, not through any personal connection to Asif. Gen. Shah said the flat “was named” to his wife because “I already had properties in my name while she did not have any and to balance tax deductions.”
Shah said that his wife has never met Asif and that he met him just once, while an aide to Musharaff, when Asif briefly lobbied the president for his father’s film “in the corridors of Dorchester Hotel when he had accompanied the hairstylist, who had come to cut Mrs Musharraf’s hair.” Insights into the private wealth of top military officers and their families are exceedingly rare; journalists who have written about the military within Pakistan have been jailed, tortured and killed.
The Pandora Papers also reveal that Raja Nadir Pervez, a retired army lieutenant colonel and former government minister, owned International Finance & Equipment Ltd, a BVI-registered company. In the leaked files, the firm is involved in machinery and related businesses in India, Thailand, Russia and China. Records show that in 2003, Pervez transferred his shares in the company to a trust that controls several offshore companies.
One of the trust’s beneficiaries is a British arms dealer. According to U.K. court documents, one of the trust’s other companies has helped broker arms sales from Belgian manufacturer FN Herstal SA to Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., a state-owned Indian defense company.
While he owned International Finance & Equipment, Pervez also held several high-level positions in Pakistan’s government. He was elected to the National Assembly in 1985 and later joined Khan’s party. Pervez did not respond to reporters’ questions.
Another influential former military leader who shows up in the leaked documents is Maj. Gen. Nusrat Naeem, the ISI’s onetime director general of counterintelligence. He owned a BVI company, Afghan Oil & Gas Ltd, that was registered in 2009, shortly after his retirement. He said that the company had been set up by a friend and that he didn’t use it for any financial transactions.
Islamabad police later charged Naeem with fraud related to the attempted purchase of a steel mill for $1.7 million. The case was dropped.
The Pandora Papers also bring to light the notable offshore holdings of close relatives of three senior military figures.
Umar and Ahad Khattak, sons of the former head of Pakistan’s air force, Abbas Khattak, in 2010 registered a BVI company to invest what documents call “family business earnings” in stocks, bonds, mutual funds and real estate.
The Khattaks did not respond to reporters’ questions.
In an example involving intergenerational wealth transfer, Shahnaz Sajjad Ahmad inherited a fortune from her father, a retired lieutenant general, through an offshore trust that owns two London apartments, purchased in 1997 and 2011 in Knightsbridge, a short walk from Harrods. She, in turn, set up a trust for her daughters in 2003 in Guernsey, a tax haven in the English Channel. Her father was a favorite of Field Marshal Mohammad Ayub Khan, the country’s first military dictator (1958-1969). After her father retired from the army, he founded one of Pakistan’s biggest business conglomerates. Ayub Khan’s son later married into the family and sits on the boards of several of the group’s businesses.
Shahnaz did not respond to ICIJ’s requests for comment.
Taken together, the findings offer a portrait of an unaccountable military elite with extensive personal and family offshore holdings.
‘A defining moment’
As Pakistan’s ultimate political arbiter, the military would eventually test Imran Khan’s reformist ideals.
Born in 1952, Khan was the son of a Lahore civil engineer, and he enjoyed the privileges of Pakistan’s insular, and insulated, upper class. When the electricity failed, elites could turn on generators. If hospitals were substandard, they flew abroad for care. “I was from that privileged class that was not affected by the general deterioration in the country,” Khan wrote in his 2011 autobiography, “Pakistan: A Personal History”.
Khan’s elite boarding school, Aitchison College, was named for the colonial administrator who founded it. Lessons were in English; boys caught speaking Urdu during school hours were fined.
The education system replicated colonial values, Khan wrote, teaching elites that they should “look upon the masses with contempt” and that “the natives were not to be trusted.”
As a young man, he befriended future leaders of Pakistan, meeting Nawaz Sharif at a cricket club, stopping by for Sunday cheese and canape parties at the Oxford University lodgings of another future Pakistani prime minister, Benazir Bhutto. He also developed a reputation as a playboy and a denizen of London’s nightclubs.
Khan played his first cricket match for Pakistan’s national team in 1971, when he was just 18, became captain at the age of 29 and, 10 years later, led the team to victory in the 1992 World Cup. In a country passionate about cricket, Khan’s athletic feats made him a national hero – and drew the attention of politicians hoping to capitalize on his popularity. Two of the Pakistan’s military leaders – Generals Musharraf and Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq – and Sharif, the three-time civilian prime minister, invited him to join their governments. He refused them all, later declaring in his autobiography that each administration was either incompetent or corrupt.
He wrote that he entered politics after the experience of building a cancer hospital in his mother’s memory in 1994 left him stunned both by the generosity of ordinary Pakistanis and the failings of their government: “I discovered how hard it was to achieve anything in Pakistan while also battling bureaucracy and corruption.”
In 1996, Khan founded the PTI party, vowing to root out corruption, address wealth inequality and break the hold of the country’s two political dynasties – those of the Bhutto and Sharif families – which he claimed ruled Pakistan like a “fiefdom.”
Among the early targets of Khan’s anti-corruption campaign was another powerful family, the Elahis, known in Pakistan as the Chaudhrys of Gujrat.
After Musharraf forcibly ousted Prime Minister Sharif in 1999, during his second term, Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, a prominent political figure, organized the Pakistan Muslim League-Q to support the coup. The PML-Q, known for backing Pakistan’s military governments, remains closely aligned with the military.
Over the years Pakistan’s anti-corruption agencies have launched and dropped several investigations into his business dealings. Around 2002, Khan petitioned the national bank to investigate loans to Elahi’s company which had allegedly been written off. At one point he called him “the biggest dacoit in Punjab,” using an Urdu word for “bandit.” Despite being a national hero and benefiting from well-funded campaigns powered by the enthusiastic support of Pakistanis abroad, Khan remained a political outsider, in part because he refused to make alliances with forces he called corrupt. Middle-class and other reform-minded voters flocked to his 2013 campaign, waving cricket bats. And Khan gained a powerful ally: the military, then in a power struggle with both mainstream civilian factions. But the PTI gained just 35 of the 342 seats in the National Assembly that year.
Then came the Panama Papers.
The revelations about then-Prime Minister Sharif and his family’s London real estate holdings, followed by the discovery that his oldest daughter forged documents in an attempt to cover up her ownership, played perfectly to Khan’s anti-corruption message and turbocharged his political fortunes. “’The leaks are God-sent,” Khan said at the time. Taking stock of the impact on the country’s ruling elite a year later, he declared, “This is a defining moment in the history of Pakistan.”
Pakistan’s Supreme Court soon disqualified Sharif from office for falling short of constitutional requirements to be “truthful and trustworthy.” The ISI was involved in the investigation of Sharif. He was later sentenced to 10 years in prison on related corruption charges.
In the 2018 elections, Khan’s PTI secured a fourfold increase in National Assembly seats, bringing the party to the brink of power. Throngs of his supporters danced outside the party’s headquarters in Islamabad. But Khan hadn’t won the outright majority and needed to form a government. Sharif and Bhutto’s parties, the target of years of his attacks, were not an option. That left a coalition of smaller parties, led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Q, the Elahis’ party. Khan made the deal.
A fateful political alliance
Since taking office, Khan has continued to deploy anti-corruption rhetoric and rail against elites who, he has said on Twitter, “come to power and plunder the country.” But analysts say Khan has disappointed his reform-minded supporters and has become widely viewed as a figurehead. “He doesn’t have a problem with the military ruling the country while they pretend that he’s in charge,” Aqil Shah, a visiting academic at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,told ICIJ.
Khan’s spokesperson, Shabhaz Gill, told ICIJ that the “PTI believed in the separation of powers,” and the military came under the power of the executive branch of the state.
The Pandora Papers reveal that Khan has surrounded himself with people – cabinet ministers and their families, donors and other political allies – who have holdings hidden offshore.
Shaukat Tarin, Khan’s finance minister, and members of Tarin’s family, own four offshore companies. According to Tariq Fawad Malik, a financial consultant who handled the paperwork on the companies, they were set up as part of the Tarin family’s intended investment in a bank with a Saudi business. He said that, “as a mandatory prerequisite by [the] regulator, we engaged with the Central Bank of Pakistan to obtain their ’in-principle’ approval for the said strategic investment.” The deal didn’t proceed.
Tarin didn’t respond to ICIJ’s questions. In a statement issued the day of the Pandora Papers’ publication, Tarin said: “The off-shore companies mentioned were incorporated as part of the fund raising process for my Bank.”
Omer Bakhtyar, the brother of Khan’s minister for industries, Makhdum Khusro Bakhtyar, transferred a $1 million apartment in the Chelsea area of London to his elderly mother through an offshore company in 2018. The state anti-corruption agency has been investigating allegations that his family’s wealth inexplicably “ballooned” since Bhaktyar first became a minister in Pervez Musharaff’s government in 2004.
In a written statement to ICIJ, Makhdum Bakhtyar said that the anti-corruption agency’s investigation was founded on baseless allegations which had underestimated his family’s past wealth, and that it has so far not resulted in a formal complaint.
The son of Waqar Masood Khan, Khan’s chief adviser for finance and revenue between 2019 and 2020, co-owned a company based in the British Virgin Islands. Masood resigned in August amid a policy dispute. Khan told ICIJ that he did not know what his son’s company did. He said his son lived a modest life, and was not his financial dependent. And Khan’s former minister for water resources, Faisal Vawda, set up an offshore company in 2012 to invest in U.K. properties, the Pandora Papers show. He resigned in March amid a controversy over his status as a dual U.S.-Pakistan national. Vawda told ICIJ that he has declared all worldwide assets held in his name to Pakistani tax authorities.
Gill, Khan’s spokesperson, said that Khan had passed an executive order requiring unelected members of his cabinet to declare their assets, in addition to the asset disclosures already required of members of the National Assembly under Pakistani law.
Khan’s financial backers are also prominent in the files.
https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/pakistan-imran-khan-prime-minister-allies-offshore/