Monday, March 4, 2019

Music Video - DILDAR SADQAY LAKH WAR SADQAY - NOOR JAHAN

#PAKISTAN UNDER PRESSURE FROM #FATF DUE TO JUD, FIF, JEM, IS, TALIBAN

Paris-based Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is mounting pressure on Pakistan on terror financing and by fresh warnings and demanding to do more, saying that had revised its terror financing risk assessment, but did “not demonstrate a proper understanding of the terror financing risks posed by ISIS (Daesh) group, AQ (Al Qaeda), JuD, FIF, LeT (Lashkar-e-Taiba), JeM, HQN (Haqqani Network), and persons affiliated with the Taliban”.
It asked Pakistan to deliver on its commitments to curb terror financing and money laundering risks to the global financial system has virtually put the country’s entire machinery into an aggressive mode to show tangible progress within two months.
The achievement of 27 targets under a 10-point action plan has now become a top priority for the government. As the FATF meetings were still in progress (Feb 18-22), the government announced a ban on Jamat-ud-Dawa (JuD) and Falah-e-Insanyat Foundation (FIF) to partially address the concerns raised by India that Pakistan supported these and six similar organisations, including Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) or at least considered them low-risk entities.
JeM reportedly claimed responsibility for the recent Pulwama attack in which 44 Indian security forces personnel died. This provided India with new fuel to embarrass Pakistan and it tried to isolate it financially and diplomatically. The FATF had specifically noted with concern and condemned the Pulwama attack, saying such incidents proved that terrorism continued to threaten societies and citizens around the world, which could not occur without money and the means to move funds among terrorist supporters. Since then, inter-ministerial consultations have been taking place on a daily basis to address weak areas pointed out by the International Cooperation Review Group (ICRG) of the FATF that assessed Pakistan’s progress report submitted by the Asia Pacific Joint Group — a regional associate of the FATF.
The Financial Monitoring Unit issued 8,707 suspicious transaction reports (STRs) in 2018, up 57pc from 5,548 STRs in 2017
In one of the recent meetings, authorities reported to the prime minister that the issue was serious from a global perspective, noting that it was in Pakistan’s own interest to put its house in order. The meeting was arranged with all the relevant agencies and institutions by the Ministry of Finance for a push at the highest level.
It was reported that six banks had been fined and 109 bankers were being investigated for opening fake bank accounts. About 8,707 suspicious transaction reports (STRs) were issued in 2018 by the Financial Monitoring Unit (FMU), showing almost 57 per cent growth over 5,548 STRs of 2017. About 1,136 STRs were issued in January and February this year alone.
Smuggled currency and jewellery worth more than Rs20 billion were confiscated between July 2018 and Jan 31, up 66pc from Rs12bn a year ago.
Memoranda of understanding are being signed with the United Kingdom, Qatar, United Arab Emirates and Australia for financial intelligence sharing. Pakistan is also trying to improve coordination among different agencies of the government through centralised software.
While such data may impress domestic audience, the FATF and its partners review processes, systems and weaknesses on the basis of a standard matrix. Pakistan is monitored on 27 indicators under the 10-point action plan with deadlines. The ICRG that reviewed Pakistan in recent meetings was not satisfied with progress on milestones set for January 2019. This was despite improvements in the anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime and integrated database for currency declaration arrangements.
It showed concerns about Pakistani authorities’ inability to demonstrate why they considered eight proscribed entities to be low risk as opposed to the high-risk view of the APG and ICRG. Therefore, the FATF urged “Pakistan to swiftly complete its action plan, particularly those with timelines of May 2019” to address strategic deficiencies.

http://www.shiitenews.org/index.php/pakistan/item/36792-pakistan-under-pressure-from-fatf-due-to-jud-fif-jem-is-taliban

Pakistan announces crackdown on terror groups flagged by UN, amid high tension with India over Kashmir

Pakistan has faced pressure to get tough with terror groups since a massive suicide bombing in Kashmir killed 40 Indian troops on February 14
Pakistan on Monday announced the freezing of accounts and seizure of assets linked to organisations banned by the UN Security Council, as pressure mounted on the country to crack down on militant groups amid tensions with India. The move comes after weeks of heightened tensions in South Asia after a massive suicide bombing in Kashmir killed 40 Indian troops on February 14, with the attack claimed by Pakistan-based militant group Jaish-e-Mohammed.
The incident prompted New Delhi to carry out air strikes inside Pakistan and an Indian pilot was shot down in a dogfight with Pakistani aircraft. Islamabad freed the Indian pilot in what Islamabad called a “peace gesture”. Pakistan’s foreign office said in a statement that the government had issued the “United Nations Security Council (Freezing and Seizure) Order, 2019”.
A senior foreign office official, requesting anonymity, said “this order means the government will take control of assets … and control all the accounts of organisations banned by the UNSC”.
The United States pressed Pakistan last month to punish those behind the Kashmir attack, with State Department spokesman Robert Palladino urging “all countries to uphold their responsibilities pursuant to the United Nations Security Council resolutions to deny safe haven and support for terrorists”.
Islamabad has banned Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) and Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation (FIF), groups believed to be fronts for the 2008 Mumbai terror attack.
JuD and FIF are considered by the UN to be fronts for Lashkar-e-Taiba, a group accused by Washington and New Delhi of carrying out the Mumbai attack, which killed 166 people and brought India and Pakistan to the brink of war.

Progress on China-Pakistan Economic Corridor tears through rumors

By Zhou Rong 

When describing Sino-Pakistani friendship, people often use words like higher than the mountains, deeper than the sea, sweeter than honey, harder than steel, and more precious than the eyes. The two countries have established an all-weather and all-round strategic partnership that is time-tested and is a model for other countries with different social systems to build good neighborly relations. 

The rapid construction and development of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is not possible without the full protection and support of the Pakistani government and army. So far, the economic corridor has been safe from terror attacks.

The corridor has become one of the earliest, fastest-moving and most effective projects under the Belt and Road initiative. Of the 43 projects confirmed at the beginning of the corridor, 20 are under construction or have been completed. 

Another 157 projects in the corridor will be gradually completed in the next 12 years. As a major pilot project of the Belt and Road initiative, the corridor has been lauded by the Pakistani government. 

Driven by the corridor construction, Pakistan's rate of economic growth rose to 5.97 percent last year from 3.5 percent in 2013, ranking top in Asia. As long as the corridor projects advance smoothly, economic growth can rise up to 9 percent.

The corridor construction has created nearly 60,000 direct jobs in Pakistan. It is expected to create 700,000 jobs in the country by 2030. If related industries are counted, at least 3.5 million jobs will be created, benefiting millions of families. 

Many Pakistani employees have been sent to China for further study by Chinese-funded enterprises and will soon become the leading figures of the new generation seeing Pakistani industrialization.

On the other hand, although the Pakistani government and the military have been doing their utmost to protect the security of the CPEC, there are reports discrediting it by West-driven English language media. 

There have been rumors, such as those saying that the corridor will follow the old road of the British East India Company and lead to a new colonization of Pakistan; China has sent a large number of prisoners to Pakistan to work on the construction in order to save labor costs; China only focuses on Punjab province; China won't offer preferential trade policy to Pakistan; the industrial park has become a special economic zone exclusive to Chinese capitals. All these rumors have had a negative impact.

China has responded to the rumors on several occasions. All Chinese engineers and technicians working in Pakistan have obtained the consent of the relevant departments of both governments. Beijing has never sent a person with a criminal record to work in Pakistan and has called back all Chinese people who have violated discipline in Pakistan. China did not send any soldier to Pakistan, nor build any military base in the country. China respects Pakistan's social and economic development and has never insisted on completely equivalent reciprocity. It continues to provide Pakistan with preferential treatment in terms of trade. 

China has not stopped non-Chinese companies from entering the China-Pakistan economic free zone and has no reason to do so. And China prefers certain provinces in Pakistan because they have a good development record with a high degree of safety. 

China and Pakistan should work together to curb the false reports on the CPEC through in-depth and multifaceted cooperation and build a good media corridor in between. Writers and intellectuals from both countries should also join hands to explore positive stories on the corridor. 

I strongly agree with the China-Pakistan Life Rescue Corridor that is being built. We can also build corridors on employment and industrial parks so as to increase cooperation between bilateral enterprises and interaction between Pakistani and Chinese people. 

India-Pakistan clash may affect China’s South Asia policy


By Fu Xiaoqiang 

Tensions between India and Pakistan kept raging on Saturday as an exchange of fire between their troops killed at least six civilians and two Pakistani soldiers along the Line of Control (LOC) on their fiercely disputed Kashmir border, The Guardian reported.

Relations have dived dramatically between the two rivals since a suicide attack by a Pakistan-based terrorist group killed at least 40 Indian paramilitary troopers. India accused Islamabad of harboring what New Delhi calls militant camps housing the group behind the attack, and carried out airstrikes inside Pakistani territory on February 26. Pakistan denied the existence of any such camps, and retaliated with its own aerial mission the following day, which led to both sides claiming to have shot down each other's fighter jets.

It is because of extreme mutual distrust on security issues that the flare-up between the arch foes has escalated. Regardless of the complexity of the incident, both New Delhi and Islamabad believe the onus of escalation lies on the other side. 

India blamed Pakistan for the February 14 suicide bombing, and retaliated by launching air raids inside Pakistan in a bid to force Islamabad to change its security policy. India's dangerous move exacerbated the crisis. 

India's domestic politics has also influenced the hostility with Pakistan. Facing upcoming elections, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has had to take these pressures into consideration. Strong measures against Pakistan are now regarded politically correct in India's political circles. 

Hence, New Delhi seems unlikely to step back and soften its policy against Islamabad. As a result, such low-intensity confrontation may last for a relatively long time.

Even so, the crisis is still manageable given that both countries possess nuclear weapons, which would act as deterrents. In addition, intervention by the international community can lower the tensions. 

If India continues to impose pressure on Pakistan, the situation could turn critical, but this seems unlikely. New Delhi will eventually adjust its response after a more objective understanding of the consequences that escalation in the crisis may lead to.

Bilateral hostility has not only threatened regional peace and security in South Asia, but also affected the international community. The Kashmir dispute is intertwined with complex ethnic and religious issues. If the crisis continues to worsen, the flow of international extremist forces and armed support for Kashmir militants may rise.

In addition, the disputed Kashmir is contiguous to China. Though the region has been a long-lasting problem between India and Pakistan, the current crisis may influence China's policy on South Asia. 

Both neighboring powers are China's important partners. As a pivot of the China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative, Pakistan has all-round friendly relations with China. In particular, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor is a key project playing an essential role in pioneering new approaches to exchange and cooperation between the two sides. 

As a newly emerging power, India has an important impact on the international order and globalization. China and India, two significant strategic partners, are involved in various international organizations including the G20, Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS. New Delhi is an indispensable part of Beijing's great-power politics.

Therefore, it is tough for China to take sides. In general, Beijing will adhere to the mediation policy. In the long run, if tensions continue to rise, China may face a greater impact; but despite that China is facing difficulties in mediating between the two neighbors, in the current scenario, the influence on China is limited.

Secret CIA Docs Claim Pakistani Intel Funded JeM's Predecessor Before bin Laden

The outfit was initially sponsored by Pakistan and then later gravitated towards Osama bin Laden when it was in need of more funds.
New Delhi (Sputnik): The predecessor organisation of Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Harkat-ul-Ansar (HuA), was funded by the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), the intelligence agency of Pakistan, says a news report, quoting declassified CIA papers.
The CIA documents, which have yet to be commented on by Pakistani authorities, show that HuA received ISI funds and that later the organisation drifted towards Osama Bin Laden for more funds.
The financial support was scaled down by Pakistan for fear of being placed on the list of countries that were deemed to be state sponsors of terrorism.
"Azhar Masood, the founder Jaish-e-Mohammed was the top functionary of HuA. He used to receive regular funding from the Pakistani intelligence agencies and had complained that enough money was not being sent through, as per declassified documents of the American (Central Intelligence Agency) record", the report says.
Masood was the general secretary in HuA when he was arrested by India in 1994 in Kashmir.
"Diplomatic reports indicate that ISI provided at least $30,000 — and possibly as much as $69,000 — per month to the HuA. The terror outfit was primarily targeting India. It had taken Western nationals hostage and had 'probably killed' them", the report adds.
The report quoted by the Indian newspaper was prepared by the CIA in 1996, but was made publicly available as part of a tranche of declassified documents last year.
The newspaper report further quoted intelligence inputs as claiming that Masood received financial assistance and support for setting up JeM not only from the ISI, but also the Taliban government in Afghanistan and international terrorist Osama bin Laden.
These links were apparently forged through the Binoria Madrassah located in Karachi.
https://sputniknews.com/asia/201903041072939061-pakistan-isi-jaish-funding/

Indian Jets Reportedly Down Pakistani Drone Near Bilateral Border

The tensions between Islamabad and New Delhi were exacerbated following the shooting down of an Indian MiG-21 by the Pakistan Air Force. The downing came in response to a recent airstrike by the Indian Air Force on an alleged terrorist camp in Pakistan.
Pakistani drone has been shot down by Indian forces on 4 March close to the city of Bikaner, in Indian state of Rajasthan. The drone entered Indian airspace at around 11:30 am (6:30 UTC) and was then downed by Indian Sukhoi 30MKI fighter jet.
The debris of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) fell on the Pakistani side of the border. According to an anonymous source in New Delhi, the drone was shot in the same area where almost a dozen Pakistan Air Force jets attempted to intrude into Indian airspace on 27 February.
Escalation of Tensions Between Pakistan and India
Relations between Islamabad and New Delhi remain strained after the Pakistan Air Force downed two Indian jets on its territory and captured their pilots. New Delhi has stated that its jets shot down a Pakistani F-16 in the course of the encounter. Islamabad denies losing a single plane, as well as using F-16s in the first place.
Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi called for a diplomatic resolution to the escalating tensions between the two states following Islamabad's "peace gesture" on 1 March, when it released one of the Indian pilots of the downed MiG-21.
The downing of the jets came following an airstrike conducted by the Indian Air Force on an alleged camp belonging to the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terrorist group on Pakistani territory on 26 February. The air raid was New Delhi's response to a terrorist attack on an Indian security convoy on 14 February carried out by JeM that claimed the lives of 40 men. Islamabad has denied the camp's existence and stated that the airstrike hit an empty hillside.
India insists that Pakistan is harbouring and supporting militants that are conducting terrorist attacks on Indian territory against its military personnel. Islamabad denies the accusations.

https://sputniknews.com/asia/201903041072942300-india-pakistan-drone-down/

China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Plan in Pakistan Takes a Military Turn



By Maria Abi-Habib
Under a program China insisted was peaceful, Pakistan is cooperating on distinctly defense-related projects, including a secret plan to build new fighter jets.
When President Trump started the new year by suspending billions of dollars of security aid to Pakistan, one theory was that it would scare the Pakistani military into cooperating better with its American allies.
The reality was that Pakistan already had a replacement sponsor lined up.
Just two weeks later, the Pakistani Air Force and Chinese officials were putting the final touches on a secret proposal to expand Pakistan’s building of Chinese military jets, weaponry and other hardware. The confidential plan, reviewed by The New York Times, would also deepen the cooperation between China and Pakistan in space, a frontier the Pentagon recently said Beijing was trying to militarize after decades of playing catch-up.
All those military projects were designated as part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a $1 trillion chain of infrastructure development programs stretching across some 70 countries, built and financed by Beijing. Chinese officials have repeatedly said the Belt and Road is purely an economic project with peaceful intent. But with its plan for Pakistan, China is for the first time explicitly tying a Belt and Road proposal to its military ambitions — and confirming the concerns of a host of nations who suspect the infrastructure initiative is really about helping China project armed might.
As China’s strategically located and nuclear-armed neighbor, Pakistan has been the leading example of how the Chinese projects are being used to give Beijing both favor and leverage among its clients.Since the beginning of the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013, Pakistan has been the program’s flagship site, with some $62 billion in projects planned in the so-called China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. In the process, China has lent more and more money to Pakistan at a time of economic desperation there, binding the two countries ever closer.
For the most part, Pakistan has eagerly turned more toward China as the chill with the United States has deepened. Some Pakistani officials are growing concerned about losing sovereignty to their deep-pocketed Asian ally, but the host of ways the two countries are now bound together may leave Pakistan with little choice but to go along.
Even before the revelation of the new Chinese-Pakistani military cooperation, some of China’s biggest projects in Pakistan had clear strategic implications.A Chinese-built seaport and special economic zone in the Pakistani town of Gwadar is rooted in trade, giving China a quicker route to get goods to the Arabian Sea. But it also gives Beijing a strategic card to play against India and the United States if tensions worsen to the point of naval blockades as the two powers increasingly confront each other at sea. A less scrutinized component of Belt and Road is the central role Pakistan plays in China’s Beidou satellite navigation system. Pakistan is the only other country that has been granted access to the system’s military service, allowing more precise guidance for missiles, ships and aircraft.
The cooperation is meant to be a blueprint for Beidou’s expansion to other Belt and Road nations, however, ostensibly ending its clients’ reliance on the American military-run GPS network that Chinese officials fear is monitored and manipulated by the United States.
In Pakistan, China has found an amenable ally with much to recommend it: shared borders and a long history of cooperation; a hedge in South Asia against India; a large market for arms sales and trade with potential for growth; a wealth of natural resources.Now, China is also finding a better showcase for its security and surveillance technology in a place once defined by its close military relationship with the United States.
“The focus of Belt and Road is on roads and bridges and ports, because those are the concrete construction projects that people can easily see. But it’s the technologies of the future and technologies of future security systems that could be the biggest security threat in the Belt and Road project,” said Priscilla Moriuchi, the director of strategic threat development at Recorded Future, a cyberthreat intelligence monitoring company based in Massachusetts.
The tightening China-Pakistan security alliance has gained momentum on a long road to the Arabian Sea.
In 2015, under Belt and Road, China took a nascent port in the Pakistani coastal town of Gwadar and supercharged the project with an estimated $800 million development plan that included a large special economic zone for Chinese companies.
Linking the port to western China would be a new 2,000-mile network of highways and rails through the most forbidding stretch of Pakistan: Baluchistan Province, a resource-rich region plagued by militancy.
The public vision for the project was that it would allow Chinese goods to bypass much longer and more expensive shipping routes through the Indian Ocean and avoid the territorial waters of several American allies in Asia. From the beginning, though, key details of the project were kept from the public and lawmakers, officials say, including the terms of its loan structure and the length of the lease, more than 40 years, that a Chinese state-owned company secured to operate the port.
In recent years, Chinese state-owned companies have built or begun constructing seaports at strategic spots around the Indian Ocean, including places in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Malaysia.Chinese officials insisted that the ports would not be militarized. But analysts began wondering whether China’s endgame was to muscle its way onto coastal territories that could become prime military assets — much as it did when it started militarizing contested islands in the South China Sea.Then, Sri Lanka, unable to repay its ballooning debt with China, handed over the Chinese-built port at Hambantota in a 99-year lease agreement last year. Indian and American officials expressed a growing conviction that taking control of the port had been China’s intent all along.
In October, Vice President Mike Pence said Sri Lanka was a warning for all Belt and Road countries that China was luring them into debt traps.
“China uses so-called debt diplomacy to expand its influence,” Mr. Pence said in a speech.
“Just ask Sri Lanka, which took on massive debt to let Chinese state companies build a port of questionable commercial value,” Mr. Pence added. “It may soon become a forward military base for China’s growing blue-water navy.”
Military analysts predict that China could use Gwadar to expand the naval footprint of its attack submarines, after agreeing in 2015 to sell eight submarines to Pakistan in a deal worth up to $6 billion. China could use the equipment it sells to the South Asian country to refuel its own submarines, extending its navy’s global reach. The Sahiwal coal power plant in Pakistan’s Punjab Province was one of the first and biggest projects financed and completed under the Belt and Road Initiative. Pakistan has fallen behind on payments just to operate the plant. The Sahiwal coal power plant in Pakistan’s Punjab Province was one of the first and biggest projects financed and completed under the Belt and Road Initiative. Pakistan has fallen behind on payments just to operate the plant.
Deepening Debt
When China inaugurated Belt and Road, in 2013, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s new government in Pakistan saw it as the answer for a host of problems.
Foreign investment in Pakistan was scant, driven away by terrorist attacks and the country’s enduring reputation for corruption. And Pakistan desperately needed a modern power grid to help ease persistent electricity shortages.
Pakistani officials say that Beijing first proposed the highway from China’s western Xinjiang region through Pakistan that connected to Gwadar port. But Pakistani officials insisted that new coal power plants be built. China agreed.With CPEC under fresh scrutiny, Chinese and Pakistani officials in recent weeks have contended that Pakistan has a debt problem, but not a Chinese debt problem. In October, the country’s central bank revealed an overall debt and liability burden of about $215 billion, with $95 billion externally held. With nearly half of CPEC’s projects completed — in terms of worth — Pakistan currently owes China $23 billion.But the country stands to owe $62 billion to China — before interest balloons the figure to some $90 billion — under the plan for Belt and Road’s expansion there in coming years.Pakistan’s central bank governor, Ashraf Wathra, said publicly in 2015 that he had no clarity on Chinese investments in Pakistan and was concerned about rising debt levels. It still took him months after that to secure a briefing from cabinet officials.Years after contracting to have China build new power plants, Pakistan still has a problem with severe electricity shortfalls.
Years after contracting to have China build new power plants, Pakistan still has a problem with severe electricity shortfalls. “My main question was, ‘Do we have any feasibility studies of these projects and a cost-benefit analysis?’ Their answers were all evasive,” recalled Mr. Wathra, who has since retired.
Ahsan Iqbal, a cabinet minister and the main architect for CPEC in the previous government, said the project was well thought-through and dismissed Mr. Wathra’s account.
“No one wanted to invest here — the Chinese took a chance,” Mr. Iqbal said in an interview. But the bill is coming due. Pakistan’s first debt repayments to China are set for next year, starting at about $300 million and gradually increasing to reach about $3.2 billion by 2026, according to officials. And Pakistan is already having trouble paying what it owes to Chinese companies. Pakistan already builds Chinese-designed JF-17 fighter jets, like this one. Under a secret proposal, Pakistan would also cooperate with China to build a new generation of fighters.Pakistan already builds Chinese-designed JF-17 fighter jets, like this one. Under a secret proposal, Pakistan would also cooperate with China to build a new generation of fighters.
Fighter Jets and Satellites
According to the undisclosed proposal drawn up by the Pakistani Air Force and Chinese officials at the start of the year, a special economic zone under CPEC would be created in Pakistan to produce a new generation of fighter jets. For the first time, navigation systems, radar systems and onboard weapons would be built jointly by the countries at factories in Pakistan. The proposal, confirmed by officials at the Ministry of Planning and Development, would expand China and Pakistan’s current cooperation on the JF-17 fighter jet, which is assembled at Pakistan’s military-run Kamra Aeronautical Complex in Punjab Province. The Chinese-designed jets have given Pakistan an alternative to the American-built F-16 fighters that have become more difficult to obtain as Islamabad’s relationship with Washington frays.
The plans are in the final stages of approval, but the current government is expected to rubber stamp the project, officials in Islamabad say.
For China, Pakistan could become a showcase for other countries seeking to shift their militaries away from American equipment and toward Chinese arms, Western diplomats said. And because China is not averse to selling such advanced weaponry as ballistic missiles — which the United States will not sell to allies like Saudi Arabia — the deal with Pakistan could be a steppingstone to a bigger market for Chinese weapons in the Muslim world. For years, some of the most important military coordination between China and Pakistan has been going on in space. Just months before Beijing unveiled the Belt and Road project in 2013, it signed an agreement with Pakistan to build a network of satellite stations inside the South Asian country to establish the Beidou Navigation System as an alternative to the American GPS network. Beidou quickly became a core component of Belt and Road, with the Chinese government calling the satellite network part of an “information Silk Road” in a 2015 white paper.

 A model of China’s Beidou navigation satellite network, shown during the China International Aviation and Aerospace Exhibition in Zhuhai in November.CreditKin Cheung/Associated Press Like GPS, Beidou has a civilian function and a military one. If its trial with Pakistan goes well, Beijing could offer Beidou’s military service to other countries, creating a bloc of nations whose military actions would be more difficult for the United States to monitor. By 2020, all 35 satellites for the system will be launched in collaboration with other Belt and Road countries, completing Beidou.
“Beidou, whatever any users use it for — whether it’s a civilian navigating their way to the grocery store or a government using it to coordinate their rocket launches — those are all things that China can track,” said Ms. Moriuchi, of the research group Recorded Future. “And that’s what is most striking: that this authoritarian government will be a major technology provider for numerous countries in Asia, Africa and Europe.” For the Pentagon, China’s satellite launches are ominous. China’s military “continues to strengthen its military space capabilities despite its public stance against the militarization of space,” including developing Beidou and new weaponry, according to a Pentagon report issued to Congress in May. In October, Pakistan’s information minister, Fawad Chaudhry, said that by 2022, Pakistan would send its own astronaut into space with China’s help.
“We are close to China, and we are getting more close,” he said in a later interview. “It’s time for the West to wake up and recognize our importance.”
The Pakistani military has been a vital supporter, and securer, of China’s projects in Pakistan.
The Pakistani military has been a vital supporter, and securer, of China’s projects in Pakistan.CreditAkhtar Soomro/Reuters Wooing Pakistan’s Military Though the relationship between China and Pakistan has clearly grown closer, it has not been without tension. CPEC could still be vulnerable to political shifts in Pakistan — as happened this year in Malaysia, which shelved three big projects by Chinese companies.
Campaigning during the parliamentary elections that made him prime minister in July, Imran Khan vowed to review CPEC projects and renegotiate them if he won. In September, after meeting in Saudi Arabia with the crown prince, Mr. Khan said that the kingdom had agreed to invest in CPEC too. Pakistan’s new commerce minister then proposed pausing all CPEC projects while the government assessed them. The moves by Pakistan’s new government angered Beijing, which was concerned they could set back Belt and Road globally. But in Pakistan, China has a steady ally it can approach to smooth things over: the country’s powerful military establishment, which stands to fill its coffers with millions of dollars through CPEC as the military’s construction companies win infrastructure bids. Shortly after the commerce minister’s comments, the Pakistani Army’s top commander, Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa, hurried to Beijing for an unannounced visit with President Xi Jinping. The meeting came six weeks before Mr. Khan made his first official visit with the Chinese president, a trip he had listed as a priority. Statements from the military said General Bajwa and Mr. Xi spoke extensively about Belt and Road projects. General Bajwa “said that the Belt and Road initiative with CPEC as its flagship is destined to succeed despite all odds, and Pakistan’s army shall ensure security of CPEC at all costs,” read a statement from the Pakistani military.

 Shortly after the Beijing meeting, Pakistan’s government rolled back its invitation to Saudi Arabia to join CPEC and all talk of pausing or canceling Chinese projects has stopped. Prime Minister Imran Khan of Pakistan went to meet President Xi Jinping in China in November with high hopes for an economic deal. But few details have been announced. Prime Minister Imran Khan of Pakistan went to meet President Xi Jinping in China in November with high hopes for an economic deal. But few details have been announced.CreditPool photo by Thomas Peter But China could face another challenge to its investments: a Pakistani financial crisis that has forced Mr. Khan’s government to seek loans from international lenders that require transparency. Throughout September, international delegations traveled to Islamabad carrying the same message:

Reveal the extent of Chinese loans if you want financial assistance. In a late September meeting with visiting officials from the International Monetary Fund, Pakistan’s government asked for a bailout of up to $12 billion. The fund’s representatives pressed Pakistan to share all existing agreements with the Chinese government and demanded I.M.F. input during any future CPEC negotiations — a previously undisclosed facet of the negotiations, according to communications seen by the Fund and a Pakistani official. The fund also sought assurances that Pakistan would not use a bailout to repay CPEC loans.
But the Chinese Embassy in Islamabad stepped up its engagement as well, demanding that CPEC deals be kept secret and promising to shore up Pakistan’s finances with bilateral loans, Pakistani officials say. Three months after taking office, Mr. Khan still has not made good on his campaign promises to reveal the nature of the $62 billion investment Beijing has committed to Pakistan, and his government has backtracked on an I.M.F. deal. In early November, Mr. Khan visited Mr. Xi in Beijing, a trip during which he was expected to clinch bilateral loans and grants to ease Pakistan’s financial crisis. Instead, his government walked away with vague promises of a deal “in principle,” but refused to disclose any details. A Chinese national flag, center at the Sahiwal coal power plant in Pakistan, which cost about $1.9 billion to build. Pakistan now owes around $119 million in back payments to Chinese companies just for operating the plant.

#Pakistan - War drums: The challenge is to stop collective economic suicide in South Asia - Economics and the war drums



WAR is a problem not a solution. The world has learned this the hard way. The long and arduous Afghan war between the most and the least powerful nations in the last decades has reminded us of this time and again.
Besides the immediate death and destruction, war turns the development cycle backwards by mounting the crushing pressure of the conflict’s financial cost on already distressed public fiscals. It also compromises the future by scaring and sidelining the drivers of investment and growth.
It’s a pity that instead of focusing on removing pointless barriers for human development, the lagging South Asian region is once again embroiled in a military conflict that threatens its very existence and poses a serious danger for the rest of the world.
It is not clear why, but the instant reaction of the world to the tit for tat military strikes by India and Pakistan was too muted to force both nations to stop and restrain the irresponsible elements on both sides of the border trying to whip up war hysteria based on an archaic notion of nationalism.
Special standard operating procedures (SOPs) for nuclear nations should have been in place and come in to effect immediately to stop India and Pakistan before they even fired the first shot.
Beside the two conflicting sides, the world leadership (be it US, Japan, EU or China) and the UN (thought to be the voice of the collective consciousness of humanity), share the blame for the hostilities.
An economic exercise at this stage, to evaluate the impact of the events of the past two weeks, seems futile. If we survive the madness there will be ample time to calculate the losses incurred by both sides
Charting a common agenda for human development (the sustainable development goals) by the UN is remarkable but ensuring and preserving peace is fundamental. Development becomes irrelevant when survival is at stake. Business, trade and finance are peacetime activities.
An economic exercise at this stage, to evaluate the impact of the events of the past two weeks, seems futile. If we survive the madness there will be ample time to calculate the losses incurred by both sides. The immediate challenge is to stop the attempt at a collective suicide in South Asia and ensure the mistakes are not repeated.
Currently there exists no cost-benefit matrix of war for the two nuclear powers, India and Pakistan. If by commission or omission the tussle assumes scale there will be no country left to gauge damage or celebrate victory.
It’s ironic that the situation erupted at a time when economic journalists from six nations (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka) had gathered in a conference in Dubai to understand and promote the process of convergence and economic integration in South Asia.
Many journalists who had to fly back last week were shut out of the region and remained stranded in the UAE, like hundreds of thousands of others booked to leave or arrive in Pakistan and certain cities of India, at the time of filing of this report.
Flights were suspended after the airspace was closed down last week following air manoeuvres from both sides. For those who care to see through the dust of accusations, this action reflects the failure of both governments to honour the pledge of being truthful custodians of the interest of their people.
It is fortunate that war has not been declared yet, but the two biggest South Asian nations are openly claiming and counter claiming airspace intrusion and resorting to a military reply.
Anchoring their optimism on the high financial stakes of developed countries in South Asia, experts and the diplomatic community believe that the de-escalation may start soon. Most developed countries source their imports from and export to the region, along with heavy investment by multinational companies.
“Behind the scene diplomatic efforts are afoot, applying pressure on India and Pakistan to retract and shun risky adventurist ideas and resolve issues across the table,” a senior US diplomat said privately.
Responding to a question by the scribe after the presentation by the World Bank panel on the benefits and potential of economic integration between India and Pakistan, Patchamuthu Illangovan, World Bank’s country director for Pakistan said he trusts the young dynamic population of the region to discard jingoism and root for an united effort to expand the job market and increase economic opportunities.
According to a recent report of the World Bank, the trade potential between the arch rivals is over ten times the actualised trade. The summit of economic journalists of South Asia was sponsored by the Donald Reynolds National Center for Business Journalism, Arizona State University and the US Department of State.
“There is no chance of either of the two countries escaping the adverse outfall. The war scare will drive away potential investors, cause disruptions in supply chain, inflation and shortages. The
collateral damage to the economy can haunt both countries even after tensions subside,” an economist of the region said anonymously.
Dr Posh Raj Panday, chairman, South Asia watch on trade, economics and environment, blamed the lack of political will in the leadership for disrupting the natural process of convergence in South Asia. “The economic potential of the region is held hostage by political power structures,” he commented responding to a question.

#Pakistan - #PPP - Chairman Bilawal Bhutto pays rich tributes to late Comrade Jam Saqi on his death anniversary

Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari while paying rich tributes to late Comrade Jam Saqi on his first death anniversary said his struggle for the rights of downtrodden class of labourers is an unforgettable part of history of Pakistan.

In his message, the PPP Chairman said that Comrade Jam Saqi had bravely challenged the dictators and had for that challenge faced atrocities and imprisonments time and again.
He said Comrade Jam Saqi was one such leader who was never ever reluctant to speaking aloud against social injustices, taboos in economic flawed system and hence his opponents always feared him and subjected him to painful victimisation.

Comrade Jam Saqi had served the country diligently and strived for a narcotics-free country when Prime Minister Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto appointed him as Advisor to Chief Minister, said the PPP Chairman.

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said today when some people and even public leaders are prone to accommodating with established evils of the society, Comrade Jam Saqi reminds us of people-friendly and progressive minds as of him.

https://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/2019/03/04/chairman-bilawal-bhutto-zardari-pays-rich-tributes-to-late-comrade-jam-saqi-on-his-death-anniversary/