Saturday, December 31, 2016

Katy Perry - Roar

Wiz Khalifa - See You Again ft. Charlie Puth

Ariana Grande - Side To Side ft. Nicki Minaj

Video - WELCOME 2017 - Lighting Up the Sky Across the Globe

Obama planning Jan. 10 farewell speech in Chicago



President Barack Obama will give his farewell speech on Jan. 10 in Chicago.
Coming 10 days before President-elect Donald Trump is sworn in as Democrats cede the White House to Republicans, Obama's hometown address is expected to serve as his closing words to the nation as president.
The appearance will be open to the public and followed by a "family reunion" for alumni of Obama's former campaigns, according to a save-the-date notice sent to Obama alumni and obtained by the Associated Press. The White House has not confirmed Obama's speech or trip to Chicago.
Ahead of the speech, Obama and Democratic lawmakers next week will meet to try to forge a common strategy to prevent Republicans from destroying the president's signature health-care law.
On Wednesday morning, Obama travels to the Capitol for the meeting with House and Senate Democrats, according to an invitation sent to lawmakers. The White House is casting it as an effort to unite Democrats behind a plan to protect the law, known as the Affordable Care Act, before Republicans have a chance to settle on their own plan for repealing it.
Democrats are on edge over the future of the ACA, given the GOP's disdain for "Obamacare" and Trump's vows to gut it. Though Republicans are united behind the notion of repealing the law, they're split over how best to replace it. Some want to strip out unpopular provisions while leaving others intact, while other Republicans prefer a start-from-scratch approach.
It's that lack of unanimity among Republicans that Obama and Democrats hope can be exploited, if they can lay the groundwork before Trump takes office. To that end, Obama also planned to answer questions about the future of the health-care law next Friday during a livestreamed event at Blair House, just across Pennsylvania Avenue from the White House.
Initially stunned by the defeat of Hillary Clinton, Democrats are now trying to organize a counterattack to preserve the ACA, among the most significant expansions of the social safety net since Medicare and Medicaid were created 50 years ago. House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi has urged her lawmakers to make health care their focus at the start of the year.
Since the ACA passed, about 20 million people have gained coverage and the uninsured rate has dropped to a historic low of around 9 percent. Some of the coverage gains are due to employers offering jobs with health care in a stronger economy, but most experts mainly credit Obama's law.

President Obama has earned our thanks He put America on path to prosperity, justice

by Rev. Jesse Jackson 

The final days of the Obama presidency are upon us. His popularity is rising with the economy, and with the increasingly stark contrasts to his successor. It is worth being clear about the legacy that he leaves behind.

Obama came to office facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. The global financial system teetered on collapse; the auto industry faced bankruptcy; the economy was shedding 400,000 jobs a day. He also inherited the catastrophe George Bush had created with the debacle in Iraq and government misrule dramatized by the shame of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.

Now, eight years later, the economy nears full employment, with more than 15 million jobs created and private sector job growth at a record 81 consecutive months and counting. Wages are beginning to rise, after long years of stagnation or worse. The auto industry has enjoyed some of its most prosperous years.
This isn’t an accident. Obama helped rescue the economy by passing the largest stimulus in history, the most ambitious financial reform since the 1930s, and daring and direct intervention to save the auto industry. Economic growth helped lower the annual budget deficit to less than half the level he inherited.
Obama also passed the largest health care reforms in six decades, providing health insurance for 20 million Americans. His reforms saved those with pre-existing conditions, provided the young with protection under their parents’ programs and, although most Americans don’t realize it, slowed the rise of health care costs dramatically.

Running for re-election in 2012, Obama recognized that income inequality had become “the defining issue of our time.” With his progressive tax reforms both in his health care plan and in the partial repeal of the top-end Bush tax cuts, and with expanded tax credits for low-income workers and families with children, Obama made a significant beginning in addressing that inequality.

Abroad, Obama struggled against great opposition to reduce America’s exposure in the wars without end in the Middle East. His nuclear agreement with Iran, not only dismantled its nuclear weapons capable facilities, it also provided the most comprehensive and aggressive verification mechanisms in the history of arms control. In opening relations with Cuba, he helped reduce America’s isolation in our own hemisphere and made the historic turn from a policy of embargo that had failed for five decades.




http://www.thecharlottepost.com/news/2016/12/29/opinion/president-obama-has-earned-our-thanks/

President Obama's Weekly Address: Working Together to Keep America Moving Forward

Music - Chaar Botal Vodka - Yo Yo Honey Singh, Sunny Leone | Ragini MMS 2

Music -'India Waale' |Happy New Year | Shah Rukh Khan, Deepika Padukone

How the Islamic State Could Be Reborn in Afghanistan

Afghanistan’s Sikh, Hindu Minorities Demand Probe Into Sikh Killing

Sikh and Hindu communities in Afghanistan have demanded authorities investigate attacks against members of their communities, after a local Sikh community leader was shot dead in the northern city of Kunduz.
Narmang Singh, a shopkeeker also known as Dilsoz, was killed by gunmen on his way to work on December 29, the second deadly attack against members of the Sikh community in Afghanistan since September.
Senator Anarkali Honaryar, who represents the Hindu and Sikh minorities in the upper house of Afghanistan’s parliament, says the attack has deeply affected the communities.
"The incident has left a serious negative psychological impact on the Hindus and Sikhs. We urge authorities to investigate this incident as well as past attacks against the Hindus and Sikhs," Honaryar told RFE/RL on December 30.
Police in Kunduz say three suspects were arrested in connection with Singh’s killing.
On September 30, a Sikh man was abducted from his home and shot dead by suspected militants in the eastern city of Jalalabad. The killing sparked protests by the Sikh community.
A vast majority of Afghanistan’s Hindus and Sikhs -- whose were estimated to number around 220,000 in the 1980s -- have left the conflict-torn country in the past three decades.

http://www.rferl.org/a/afghanistan-sikh-hindu-minorities-police-probe-killings/28206044.html

Pakistan - JAMAAT-E-ISLAMI BACKS TAKFIRI TERRORISTS IN THE NAME OF SYRIAN MUSLIMS

Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan is backing takfiri militants in the guise of unity and sympathy with the Muslims of Syria who have been held hostage in many parts of their country on gunpoint by foreign takfiri militants, trained and funded by the United States, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other countries.

The JI is taking out a rally to express solidarity with Muslims of Syria but in fact JI is opposing the legitimate regime of Syria where Sunni Arab Muslims are in majority in the parliament and in the government. Only one Alawite president Bashar al-Assad is being portrayed as Alawi-dominated Syria to hoodwink Muslims around the world, otherwise Prime Minister, 85% ministers and parliamentarians are Sunni Muslims in Syria.
Despite leading political position of Sunni Arabs in Syria, people around the world and particularly in Pakistan, are being misled if a minority controls Syria.
Jamaat-e-Islami is hiding the fact that Syria is a democracy and pro-Palestine and anti-Israel Arab nationalist regime but Saudi Arabia and Qatar are monarchies and allies of the United States and have formed nexus with Zionist regime of Israel as well.
The liberation of Aleppo by Syrian army was a humiliating defeat of takfiri terrorists hence Jamaat-e-Islami and other such outfits were trying to deflect public attention from that humiliating defeat conceded by the militants under a deal with the Syrian regime for the sake of leaving the area safely.
In fact, the anti-Bashar takfiri militants massacred innocent people of Syria in Aleppo and other parts of that country but Jamaat-e-Islami and like-minded parties remain silent against those atrocities and misleading Muslims of Pakistan blaming Syrian government for all that.
http://www.shiitenews.org/index.php/pakistan/item/26487-jamaat-e-islami-backs-takfiri-terrorists-in-the-name-of-syrian-muslims

Pakistan - SHIA MASSACRE AND THE YEAR 2016, A DETAILED REPORT BY SHIITENEWS

Year 2016, Pakistan witnessed 58 people martyred in the name of sectarian violence, a well curtailed figure as compared to yesteryears, shia monitoring desk reported.
Despite the fact that among the number of target killings and massacres reported, takfiri terrorists kept targeting shiites on a regular basis throughout the year bringing their numbers to 61 throughout the year.
Last year some 256 shiites were martyred as compared, not taking away credit off the Law enforcement agencies, there still remains a mile to go for the number of martyrs keep coming-in in the name of sectarian rift. A hefty effort is required by forces to eradicate their strongholds, still very much active in varied cities around Pakistan.
Below is a list of martyrs in different cities reported throughout the year:
Monthly Report
January 2016
The year started with Takfiri terrorists killing three (03) innocent muslims. In the event Naved Ahmed, Mukhtar Zaidi and Naveed Abbas were martyred in Quetta, Karachi and Attock respectively, Shiite news reported.
February 2016
on 8th of this month Malik Iftikhar, a shiite momin was gunned down in Peshawar at the hands of takfiri militants.
March 2016
Karachi, Peshawar and D.I. Khan witnessed four (04) innocent shiite being murdered at the hands of hardcore terrorists. Their names were reported as Azhar Hussain, Syed Razi ul Hasan, Shamsher Ali and Abid Raza.
April 2016
Altogether four (04) innocent momineens were martyred with three (03) in Karachi and one (01) in Hyderabad. Names mentioned were; Shahid Hussain, Ali Sajjad, Hashim Rizvi and Imdad Jafri. It's worth mentioning that all three individuals in Karachi were targeted at a go, Hashim Rizvi was a Gold Medalist from Physics Department at University of Karachi.
May 2016
Sectarian intolerance amplified when this month witnessed 8 martyrdom of innocent shiites. Renowned activist-cum-journalist Khurram Zaki was silenced in this month, for his voice perturbed the illicit ideologies of west borne upon muslims in Pakistan. Khurram was martyred in Karachi, whereas D.I. Khan witness massacre of 4 innocent shias on the same day, with two advocates among them.
On may 5, Advocate Atif Ali, Advocate Murtajiz, Athar Abbas and Mukhtar Abbas embraced martyrdom in D. I. Khan.
May 7 was the day when Khurram Zaki was killed.
May 12 was when parachinar witnessed martyrdom of Nasir Ali, Yahya Hussain and Akbar Ali.
June 2016
Apart from the heinous murder of renowned qawal and singer 'Amjad Sabri', June witnessed another kill in Karachi with martyrdom of Muhammad Abbas.
On June 22 Muhammad Azhar and Amjad Sabri were murdered, whereas Nadeem Abbas was killed in D. I. Khan on June 30.
July 2016
Advocate Shahid Abbas Shirazi was gunned down in D. I. Khan.
August 2016
Three (03) Shia muslims were shot in this very month.
On Aug 1 Muhammad Nabi and Ghulam Nabi in Quetta
On Aug 23 Saim Raza in Karachi.
September 2016
Death was accounted in Karachi and Shikarpur, with Muhammad Rafique in Shikarpur on Sept 17 and Shabad Haider in Karachi on Sept 20.
October, November 2016
According to Shiitenews, October witnessed Muharram processions this year again, with last year witnessing 255 innocent shiite muslims martyred in the name of sectarian rift. This year there were 4 major incidences recorded with 25 innocent muslims martyred to include women.

Muharramsk_1.jpg
December 2016
Till date there have been 6 encounters recorded with martyrdoms reported.
Dec 1 Syed Ilyas Shah was murdered in Quetta
Dec 02 Irfan Ali and Muharram Ali were martyred in Karachi
Dec 08 Ali Khan was killed in Quetta
Dec 10 Nazar Hussain massacred in Abbottabad
Dec 12 Haider Ali was targeted in Quetta to embrace martyrdom.
charts.jpg
http://www.shiitenews.org/index.php/pakistan/item/26488-shia-massacre-and-the-year-2016-a-detailed-report-by-shiitenews-ks

How not to end the Afghan war








By Afrasiab Khattak

In the mid 1980s when the Cold War was at its peak and things had heated up in Afghanistan, the former Soviet statesman Mikhail Gorbachev described Afghanistan as a country that had turned into a bleeding wound. Unfortunately, apart from some brief intervals, the unlucky country hasn’t seen peace in the true sense of the word throughout the last four decades. Almost all the so-called players in the Afghan situation have so shamelessly played double games at the cost of Afghan blood that it isn’t easy for Afghans to distinguish friends from foes and there is hardly any distinction in this regard among Muslims and non-Muslims. This hapless country seems to have been almost kissed to death by its so-called friends.
Afghans also bear responsibility for naively embracing the narrative of “Jihad” woven by the big power rivalry for dominating the heart of Eurasia. They have been, to a great extent, victims of their underdeveloped socio-state formation and strategic location. But the big powers and regional hegemonic adventurists have also left no stone unturned to keep shedding Afghan blood. They seem to be determined to fight it out until the last Afghan. One good example of this double speak was the Moscow consultation this week, where the prospects for Afghan peace were discussed in the complete absence of Afghans. Interestingly all the three participants in the consultation, Russia, China and Pakistan have never been tired of speaking about the need for an Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace process, but they had no qualms in ignoring Afghans in discussing the solution to the armed conflict imposed on Afghanistan. It was like staging Shakespeare’s Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark.
The penchant of Pakistani security establishment for taking turns in teaming up with USA and Russia for “eliminating terrorism” is an irony of Himalayan proportions. In the 1980s Pakistan fought a Western sponsored, full-fledged, undeclared war dubbed as Jihad to throw the “infidel Russians” out of Afghanistan for stopping their purported march towards warm waters. Interestingly Mr. Zbigniew Brzizinski, the National Security Advisor to the then US President, Jimmy Carter, had to come all the way here for declaring “Jihad” against the godless Russians. Off course the pious Muslim clergy from Pakistan and Arab countries was readily available for vehemently supporting this “divine mission” that soon turned out to be the biggest covert operation of US intelligence in another country.
After 9/11 Pakistan was supposed to have taken a u-turn that subsequently proved to be a double u-turn as Pakistan supported the US war against Taliban alongside supporting Taliban in regrouping to fight against the US forces in Afghanistan. It is unbelievable that the US did not know about this double game, but by shifting focus to Iraq from Afghanistan before the elimination of extremism and terrorism they themselves revealed their non-serious attitude towards the so called War On Terror. Double games were permissible for mutual convenience.
Now the Russians have shown interest in the Taliban, the hard core Jihadists, for stopping the expansion of the so-called Islamic State (IS). It is like banking on Mussolini to stop Hitler. It’s particularly so when Taliban, IS and all other terror outfits are fighting to decimate state structures in Afghanistan. It seems that no lesson has been learnt from the liquidation of the state in Afghanistan in the 1990s and subsequently in Iraq and Libya. There is another aspect to the problem. If the experience of the 1990s is anything to go by it is pretty evident that the terror syndicate is one big indivisible body. It was in Taliban’s dominated Afghanistan that OBL and his Al Qaida, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), Chechens and numerous Pakistani terrorists networks were based. Even now, the Taliban have taken with them, from Pakistan, all the international terrorists into Afghanistan for fighting against the Afghan republic. It is a myth that Afghan Taliban do not cooperate with international terror outfits. The Russians are out to use the Taliban for inflicting a defeat on the US in Afghanistan to take revenge of their own defeat at the hands of the US supported Afghan mujahideen in the 1980s. It goes without saying that the US had decided to bleed the erstwhile Soviet Union for teaching a lesson to her for helping Vietnamese in their fight against the US. The irony is that Pakistan, as handler of former Afghan Mujahideen and now Taliban, remains available for all sides to fight their wars in Afghanistan in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The people of Pakistan had to pay a very heavy price for this insane policy as the terrorist sanctuaries in Pakistan resulted in the cancerous growth of terrorism in Pakistan, killing and maiming thousands of innocent people, particularly Pashtuns. Never approved by the parliament or the civilian government this adventurist policy has remained the baby of the country’s security agencies. Calling it a state policy is a misnomer.
In 2014 a historic opportunity for normalisation of relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan emerged during Dr. Ashraf Ghani’s Pakistan visit. The Afghan President offered almost a blank slate to Pakistan. According to him, except the sovereignty of Afghanistan, every thing else was negotiable. He was prepared to address every genuine concern of Pakistan including the extent of Indian influence in Afghanistan. Led by PM Nawaz Sharif Pakistani team couldn’t say no. 48 MOUs were signed covering strategic, political and economic aspects of relations between the two countries. Pakistan promised to bring Taliban to the negotiating table and also pledged to fight a coordinated war along side Afghanistan against the irreconcilables. But when it came to implementation it became evident that Pakistani mentors of Taliban just wanted to gain time for Taliban to make inroads through war. At times it is claimed that Pakistan doesn’t have enough influence on Taliban. Strangely enough, Pakistan has enough influence on Taliban to stop them from negotiating at their own but she pretends to be unable to bring them to the negotiating table.
Interests and policies of the big powers will keep changing in the future as they have changed in the past but Pakistan and Afghanistan have to find ways and means for peaceful coexistence as neighbors. The present escalation and impasse is dangerous for both. There is a dire need for a fresh peace initiative.

Let 2017 open a new chapter in India-Pakistan relations

The year 2016 will go down in history as one of the worst years in the Indo-Pakistan relations. Not that the relations in earlier years were much to write home about, however, what has changed is the complete breakdown of communications between the two countries. It appears that the politicians on both sides have buried their heads in the sand, with little or no effort being made to bring about a semblance of normalcy in the relations.
When Narendra Modi was elected as the prime minister, he invited his counterpart Nawaz Sharif to his oath taking ceremony. Modi’s decision was considered as a bold move to build good relations with the neighbour. It is also to the credit of Nawaz Sharif that, in spite of strong opposition from his countrymen not to accept Modi’s invitation, he responded positively by attending the ceremony. Last December, to the surprise of all the political pundits in India, Modi stopped over in Lahore to meet Nawaz Sharif. There was a great expectancy of the ordinary people of both the countries that these two leaders have shown courage to establish cordial and working relations between the two neighbours. Their meet was followed by a meeting of the National Security Advisers of both the countries to resolve all outstanding issues through dialogue.
Unfortunately, like the earlier attempts made by India’s former Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee and Nawaz Sharif, few vested interests, who were alarmed by this development, conspired to derail the talks. Immediately, after the Lahore declaration, Kargil attack happened. The infamous Kargil attack was the brainchild of former General Pervez Musharraf.
Similarly, few days after Modi’s famous stopover at Lahore on 25 December 2015, six heavily armed terrorists, suspected to belong to Islamist militant group Jaish-e-Mohammed, attacked the Air Force Station in Pathankot. The Indian government was completely taken off guard by the attack and decided to put off any further talks with Pakistan.
Then on 18 September 2016, four heavily armed terrorists attacked an army camp near the town of Uri in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. It was reported as “the deadliest ever attack on security forces in Kashmir.” The militant group Jaish-e-Mohammed was suspected of carrying out the attack. India followed with a surgical attack at their bases near the line of control, a situation that would have escalated into a full-fledged war between the countries.
This attack happened at a time when the Kashmir Valley was burning after the killing of Burhan Wani, a suspected Hizbul Commander. Burhan, overnight, became a hero in Kashmir. Thousands of people, despite tight security arrangements, attended his funeral, as a show of solidarity. Young Kashmiri youth started stone pelting on the security forces as an expression of anger against the killing of Burhan. The security forces used pellet guns against the stone pelters, which, unfortunately, claimed the lives of over 80 persons. Besides, thousands of protesters and bystanders were severely injured due to the use of pellet guns.
In India, there is a growing feeling that terrorist organisations JuD and Jaish-e-Mohammed, with the backing of the Pakistan Army and ISI, had fuelled the unrest. There were also rumours floating in the Indian establishment that General Raheel Sharif, COAS, had used the terrorist organisations to carry out a proxy war against India. This assumption stemmed from the fact that Raheel Sharif had not forgiven India for the death of his brother and uncle during the 1965 war and was carrying a grudge against India.
If the relations between India and Pakistan continue to deteriorate, there is every possibility of a low-intensity war between the two countries, a situation that will bring misery to people on both sides. Moreover, in modern warfare, there can be no absolute victors. It is, therefore, incumbent on the leadership of both the countries, to restore normalcy by deescalating tensions at the border.
As we will soon be entering 2017, it is time to sit and reflect to mend the broken fences and restart the dialogue. Both the countries need to realise that clashes at the Line of Control, and sending terrorists across the border as part of the proxy war, have become counter-productive. It is true that at the heart of Indo-Pak dispute is the unresolved issue of Kashmir.
That leaves the question – what is the way forward? Here are a few suggestions for improving the Indo-Pak ties.
As no negotiation can take place in an atmosphere charged with mistrust, tensions and grandstanding, both the countries should put all their contentious issues on the backburner, and resume talks to create a congenial climate for future negotiations. As the Kashmir issue is complex and defies any immediate solution that is acceptable to both the parties, as a first step, both India and Pakistan should allow free ingress and egress to people on both sides of Kashmir. This will go a long way in diffusing the tension and building a climate of trust and goodwill. Moreover, the people of Kashmir would welcome this step, as it will give them an opportunity to meet their relatives on either side of the border.
Both the countries should facilitate people to people contact, and promote cultural ties by encouraging the artists to visit each other. As sportsmen are ambassadors of peace, both the countries should resume the cricket and hockey ties. Who can forget the last time India visited Pakistan to play three Test matches; the reception they got from the ordinary people was unbelievable. There were instances when the shopkeepers refused to accept money from the Indian players. This shows that the ordinary people of both the countries want peace.
The new Chief of Staff of the Pakistan Army should support the civilian government in their endeavour to improve the ties with India. As he does not carry any past baggage, like his predecessors, there is an opportunity to take him on board in all future talks.
There are already some positive indications emanating from Pakistan. One, Sartaz Aziz attended the Heart of Asia Conference amidst the prevailing tensions between the two countries. In another significant development, Lieutenant General Amir Riaz, Commander Southern Command has invited India to join China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and ‘share the fruits of future development’. His invitation has been welcomed in the Chinese media. India should accept the offer, as it will help in not only bridging bridges between the two countries but will also help India to improve its relations with China.
Pakistan should also take a leadership role by including India in addressing the growing terrorism in Afghanistan, which is threatening to destabilise the Afghan government. This will help in finding an effective solution, which so far has been hindered by working at cross purposes.
In fact, in an editorial “Back to Talking”, Times of India has gone a step further recommending India to open direct channels of communication with Rawalpindi GHQ, as the Indian government is best placed to effect this shift, and overall to improve relations with Pakistan.” It is hoped that the new Chief of Staff of the Pakistan Army, who, incidentally does not carry any baggage, will support the civil government in improving the ties.
Both Modi and Sharif have already shown great statesmanship in attempting to further dialogue between both the countries, in spite of internal pressures. To borrow from Atal Bihari Vajpayee: “You can change your friends, but not your neighbours.”
Let us hope that 2017 ushers in a new chapter in India-Pakistan relations. http://dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/31-Dec-16/let-2017-open-a-new-chapter-in-india-pakistan-relations

Balochistan First






The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor’s route through Balochistan promises to be a boon for the people of the province, but not without a cost. A recent report by the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) claims that the native population of Balochistan could be outnumbered by the influx of Chinese nationals and from other areas of the country by 2048 after completion of CPEC.
On the face of it, it is shocking that the province will undergo such a demographic change if the CPEC project is successful and Chinese business interests are present for the next thirty or so years. But the deeper issue is the insecurity that such a prediction brings. Will the revenue generated from the corridor actually help the native Baloch? Additionally, it does not help Balochi morale that nearly 1,000 dead bodies of political activists and suspected armed separatists had been found in Balochistan over the past six years, according to a report by the BBC on Wednesday.
A change in the population is only acceptable if the people of Balochistan take precedence initially in terms of important developmental outreach programmes such as education and skill training. The government cannot just leave the fate of the people of Balochistan up to market forces. There has to be some investment in welfare programs for the Balochistan, and immediately, so that in the next few decades, they are not further disenfranchised, facing unemployment, migration and worst of all, protesting against the state. This will be expensive, and may not generate immediate votes for the ruling party, but without it, we will just see further mistrust, poverty and violence in Balochistan.
Changing demographics are a reality everywhere in the globalised world, and Pakistan’s security situation had, so far, prevented this from happening here. But as Pakistan moves towards becoming the land of opportunity, this is only to be expected. Foreign residents stand to bring important skill-sets to the country that can later be developed locally. In today’s financially and economically integrated world, the government has to ensure the protection and economic survival of its nationals. Protection is the primary reason for the state; making money and winning elections are just the means to do this, not the ends.
Pakistan’s provincial divide is something that it must get over, if the federation’s unity is to stand unquestioned. People-to-people exchange is just as important domestically as it is on the international scale. The inevitable change that something like the CPEC brings must not be shunned, but managed for the sake of the Pakistani citizen.

BILAWAL BHUTTO CONGRATULATES THE NEWLY ELECTED OFFICE-BEARERS OF LARKANA PRESS CLUB

Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has congratulated the newly-elected office-bearers of Larkana Press Club (LPC) and pledged that his Party will continue to stand by freedom of press and freedom of expression.


In a congratulation message to the newly-elected President S. Iqbal Babu and General Secretary Muneer Soomro of LPC, the PPP Chairman said journalists of Larkana have always been forefront in the struggle for a free media.


Bilawal Bhutto Zardari hoped that new body of LPC will follow the principles of a free and fair media to promote and strengthen democracy and rule of law. “Please also convey my felicitations to all other elected office-bearers of LPC,” he stated in his message.

Noor Jehan - Sanu Nehar Wale Pul Tay Bula Ke

DILDAR SADQY LAKH WAR - NOOR JEHAN

Music - Afshan Zebi - Lokan do do yaar banaye

Rahim shah & Humira arshad - na yam sharabi -

Bakhtzamina - Wakhla Zama De Narmo Sro

Pashto Music - Gulnar Begum - Na Darze Pa Laas Zulfi Zama

Pashto Music - Nan Pah De Hujra Ke Khushali

Pashto Music - Nan me che raashee khkule ashna

Friday, December 30, 2016

NPR's Exit Interview With President Obama, Dec 19, 2016

World Insight— Russia diplomacy direction; China, US heading for a trade war?

China calls for dialogue and mutual respect on US-Russia tensions

#Russia - Ambassadors of music’: 64 members of Alexandrov army band lost in Tu-154 crash

Will Trump reverse sanctions placed on Russia?

Putin: Russia will not expel anyone in response to US sanctions

Pashto Music - Speeni Spoogmai wa ya Ashna ba charta we na

Religious minorities in Pakistan oft-times suffer from misuse of blasphemy law: Amnesty International

A recent report issued by Amnesty International stated that the religious minorities in Pakistan often become targets of false blasphemy accusations. The report spotlighted the plight of the Christians in Pakistan, mentioning various cases when Christians and other minorities became victims of blasphemy law.
Misuse of blasphemy laws in Pakistan
The report titled: “PAKISTAN: ‘AS GOOD AS DEAD’: THE IMPACT OF THE BLASPHEMY LAWS IN PAKISTAN,” said that the controversial blasphemy law actually “emboldening vigilantes” who are willing to threaten, torture or even kill those accused of committing blasphemy.
The report quotes Supreme Court judgment in Malik Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri vs the State, 7 October 2015: “The Majority of blasphemy cases are based on false accusations stemming from property issues or other personal or family vendettas rather than genuine instances of blasphemy and they inevitably lead to mob violence against the entire community.”
“On 4 January 2011, Salmaan Taseer, the governor of Pakistan’s Punjab province, was killed by one of his
security guards, Mumtaz Qadri. He said he committed the murder because, “this is the punishment for a
blasphemer.” Salmaan Taseer had sought a presidential pardon for Asia Bibi, also known as Asia Noreen, a 45-year-old Christian farmhand and a woman with responsibility for five young children from the village of Ittan Wali, near the Punjabi city of Sheikhupura. In November 2010, Asia Bibi became the first Pakistani woman sentenced to death for blasphemy. Salmaan Taseer’s support for her, and his view that Pakistan’s blasphemy laws were “black laws”, were also cast as an act of blasphemy by supporters of the laws.
Overnight, Mumtaz Qadri became a national hero for supporters of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. Religious
parties brought tens of thousands of their followers on to the streets to demand Mumtaz Qadri’s release. A mosque was named after him and became so popular that funds were raised to create a new prayer hall. Many lawyers wanted to represent him pro bono to reward him for what they saw as a justified killing. Lawyers and religious clerics chanted slogans supporting him outside the court hearings. The Pakistan People’s Party-led government of the time bowed to public pressure, vowing not to amend the blasphemy laws.”
The report further stated: “On 2 March 2011, Shahbaz Bhatti, the only Christian member of the cabinet and the Minister for Minorities, was shot dead outside his mother’s house in Islamabad. Shahbaz Bhatti was the only senior Pakistani official to back Salmaan Taseer’s calls for the blasphemy laws to be amended. Before his death, he told the BBC that he was facing threats to his life for speaking out against the persecution of Christians and other minorities in Pakistan.
On 7 October 2015, Mumtaz Qadri’s death sentence was upheld by the Supreme Court, and on 29 February 2016 he was hanged. Following his execution, thousands of his supporters took to the streets of his hometown Rawalpindi to mark his funeral. In March 2016, thousands of Qadri supporters protested outside the National Assembly in Islamabad, setting fire to and damaging property, attacking journalists, and clashing with the police.”
“At the time of writing, Asia Bibi remains imprisoned in Sheikhupura. On 13 October 2016, the Supreme Court was scheduled to hear her case in the ultimate stage of her appeal process. On the day, the Supreme Court adjourned the appeal hearing indefinitely. Earlier, on 22 July 2015, the Supreme Court suspended Asia Bibi’s death sentence for the duration of the appeals process.
This report details how Pakistan’s blasphemy laws violate human rights, both in their substance and their application – whether this is violations of human rights by the state, or abuses of the laws by non-state actors. The laws do not meet human rights standards and lack essential safeguards to minimise the risk of additional violations and abuses.
It is difficult to establish precise information on the number of blasphemy cases as there is limited available data. However, data provided by human rights groups the National Commission for Justice and Peace (NCJP) and the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) shows a large increase of cases since the 1980s. For example, according to NCJP, a total of 633 Muslims, 494 Ahmadis, 187 Christians and 21 Hindus have been accused under various provisions on offences related to religion since 1987.” Amnesty International said in its report.

31 SAUDI WAHHABIS PERPETRATE TERRORIST ATTACKS IN PAKISTAN, AFGHANISTAN

Saudi government itself has confirmed that Saudi citizens were involved in terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and Syria. However, Saudi monarchy has understated the correct statistics of the Wahhabi takfiri terrorists belonging to Saudi kingdom.

General Mansoor al Turki, spokesman for Saudi interior ministry said that 2093 Saudi citizens were fighting in other countries alongside other transnational terrorists in aforesaid four countries of which only 31 were in Af-Pak region (Afghanistan and Pakistan).
The ministry said that only 5 Saudi citizens were fighting in Iraq and 1540 were fighting in Syria. It further said that 73 Saudi citizens were being tried in different countries and mostly for involvement in terrorist attacks.
It is relevant to add here that people of Pakistan and these three other countries believe that Saudi Wahhabis were following the Saudi monarchy’s official religion Wahhabism and they were acting upon the teaching of Mohammad Bin Abdul Wahhab (al-Nejdi), the ideological godfather of Saudi Wahhabism.

http://www.shiitenews.org/index.php/pakistan/item/26447-31-saudi-wahhabis-perpetrate-terrorist-attacks-in-pakistan-afghanistan

Pakistan - Family Planning




Pakistan has remained unsuccessful in its efforts, or lack thereof, to control its population growth. Other countries of the region and various Islamic countries have fared much better, owing to improved literacy and better implementation of policies.
The National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS) hosted an event to launch a policy brief on the ‘Population Growth and Reproductive Health’, and an appeal was made to reaffirm commitment towards reducing the rate of population of Pakistan, as it is one of the least developed countries in terms of human resource development.
Punjab Population Welfare Department Director Dr Afshan Tahir said the country has made national and international commitments to reduce the fertility rate from 3. 3 per woman from 3. 8 by 2020, and in order to do that Punjab has purchased contraceptives and has asked private doctors to distribute them and raise awareness about them.
However, in doing so, the 70 percent of the lower income strata are left out, who do not have access to private and expensive healthcare, and require access to family planning services the most.
There is still a stigma attached to the topic that needs to be addressed by including the issue in the national curriculum and reducing the barriers to the use of contraceptives.
In Pakistan, family planning is an uncomfortable topic fraught with religious overtones, however recent research has indicated that poor access to family planning services, lack of counselling and technical knowledge of unmotivated providers, and insufficient availability of affordable modern methods are the major obstacles to the uptake of modern contraceptives, rather than the more frequently cited factors such as religious and social opposition to small families. The government must reaffirm its commitment to address the inadequate supply of family planning services that are affordable and accessible to all groups, it is the only way of addressing the wider problems that plague the country.

In a Pakistan family, deal is made, a girl is given as bride





By Kathy Gannon
Mohammad Ramzan can neither hear nor speak, and he has a childlike mind. But he knew his wife, Saima, was too young when she was given to him as a bride.
The 36-year-old Ramzan smiles, eager to please, as he uses his fingers to count out her age when they married. One, two, three . . . until 13, and then he stops and looks at her, points and nods several times.
The girl’s father, Wazir Ahmed, says she was 14, not 13, but her age was beside the point. It mattered only that she had reached puberty when he arranged her marriage as an exchange: his daughter for Ramzan’s sister, whom he wanted to take as a second wife.
His first wife, Saima’s mother, had given him only daughters, and he hoped his second wife would give him a son. But Sabeel wouldn’t marry him until her brother had a wife to care for him.
She would be a bride in exchange for a bride.
“We gave a girl in this family for a girl in their family,” Ahmed says. “That is our right.”
In deeply conservative regions such as this one in the south of Punjab province, the tribal practice of exchanging girls between families is so entrenched, it even has its own name in Urdu: Watta Satta, which means give and take.
A girl may be given away to pay a debt or settle a dispute between feuding families. She might be married to a cousin to keep her dowry in the family or, as in this case, married for the prospect of a male heir.
Many believe that their Islamic religion instructs fathers to marry off their daughters at puberty.
“If it is not done, our society thinks parents have not fulfilled their religious obligation,” says Faisal Tangwani, regional coordinator for the independent Human Rights Commission of Pakistan in nearby Multan.
Ahmed sees the hand of God in his daughter’s marriage to a disabled man.
“It was by God’s will that he was chosen,” he says. “It was her fate.” Ahmed sits inside the mud-walled compound where he lives now with his two wives. Outside, stray dogs roam in packs of three and four. They bite, Ahmed warns.
He says that the fact that Ramzan is nearly three times his daughter’s age is irrelevant. But the legal marrying age here is 16, and in a rare move, police did investigate Saima’s marriage after they received a complaint, possibly from a relative involved in a dispute with her father. Ramzan and Ahmed were jailed for a few days, but Saima testified in court that she was 16 and they were released. She says she told the authorities she was 16 to protect her father and husband.
In Saima’s world of crushing poverty, where centuries-old tribal traditions mix with religious beliefs, a crippling cycle traps even the perpetrators with a life’s burden: a father who longs for a son to help support his family; a wife who must provide that son; a daughter who must become a mother even when she is still a child. Saima’s mother, Janaat, agrees with marrying off her daughters early. She says girls are a headache after they reach puberty. They can’t be left at home alone for fear of unwanted sexual activity — or worse, the daughter leaves home with a boy of her choice. “That would be a shame for us. We would have no honor. No. When they reach puberty quickly, we have to marry them,” she says. “Daughters are a burden, but the sons, they are the owners of the house.”
She says she accepted her husband’s marriage to another woman; after all, it’s her fault he only has daughters.
“I feel shame that I don’t have a son. I myself allowed my husband to get a second wife,” she says. Her husband’s new wife, Sabeel, says she agreed to marry Ahmed because of her brother. She wanted him to have a wife.
“No one had been willing to give their daughters to my brother,” she says.
Ramzan is quick to extend his hand to guests who enter through the torn and tattered curtain that hangs over the front door to his compound, tucked away in a narrow alley lined with open sewers.
Ramzan’s elderly parents live with him. His father rarely leaves his bed, saying he has trouble walking. His mother begs from morning until night, sometimes knocking on doors, other times parking herself in the middle of a dusty road, her hand outstretched for donations.
Like Ramzan, she can neither hear nor speak. Both her hips and one knee have been broken. She gestures as if breaking a twig to explain her troubled knee. Ramzan looks at Saima, her hair hidden beneath a sweeping shawl, her large brown eyes downcast.
“I didn’t want to marry her so young. I said at the time, ‘She is too young,’ but everyone said I must,” he says through a series of gestures interpreted by those around him. He held his hand up just below his chest, showing how tall she was when they married.
Saima doesn’t talk much. Her answers are short, and matter-of-fact.
“His sister and my father fell in love and they exchanged me,” Saima says. “Yes, I am afraid of my father, but it is his decision who I will marry and when.” She picks at the rope bed where she sits with Ramzan. Her husband often reaches to touch the top of her head.
He gestures that he is afraid Saima will leave him one day, and says that God will be unhappy if she does. Saima had gotten pregnant soon after she came to live with Ramzan but lost the child at five months. Ramzan gestures that he wants Saima to take some medicine to help her get pregnant again.
Saima rarely looks in his direction but says she has no quarrel with him, nor does she plan to leave.
Saima says she understands her husband’s gestures, but it’s hard to know. Most of the translations are done by his 12-year-old niece, Haseena, Sabeel’s daughter from the previous marriage.
Haseena was 10 when Saima married her uncle Ramzan and her mother left to live with the new bride’s father.
Haseena stayed in the house with her uncle and her elderly grandparents to cook, clean and keep Saima company. She even prepared Saima’s wedding dinner. “When Saima married my uncle, my mother told me to leave school and be with Saima because she will be all alone at home,” Haseena says. Haseena recalls that Saima seemed so young, the family felt sorry for her.
“At her age, she should have been playing.”
Back at Saima’s old home, her 7-year-old sister, Asma, wanders around, shoeless, her hair matted with dirt and dust. Asma already has been promised to her cousin, who is about 10. They will marry when she reaches puberty.