Monday, October 4, 2021

I compared Afghanistan school textbooks with Pakistan’s. This is what I found

By PERVEZ HOODBHOY 


Weak Karzai, Ghani governments have left behind a solid legacy for Afghanistan’s future. Taliban won’t touch it.

What did Afghan kids study after Mullah Omar’s Taliban were ousted in 2001? What was their school curriculum and, most importantly, how does it differ from PTI’s controversial Single National Curriculum (SNC)? When the Taliban government permitted boy-schools to reopen last week, these questions somehow popped into my mind.Quick answers were unavailable because the Afghan ministry of education’s website has been taken down. But, fortunately, Google helped locate several hundred Afghan school textbooks on various websites. Their printed versions had been distributed for free in schools. Textbooks are, of course, supremely important in developing countries as the primary vehicles for delivering education.
As an outsider, my initial expectations were low. Twenty-first century Afghanistan is largely tribal and backward, consumed by external wars but equally by countless feuds between families, tribes and religious sects. It has two national languages and six to eight regional languages. Wouldn’t Afghan education be utterly messed up? Inferior to Pakistan’s, the inheritor of a well-developed colonial-era system?
My assumptions were spectacularly wrong. Browsing the textbooks, I had accidentally stumbled into a world unknown to even qualified Pakistani education experts. While readers who know Dari-Farsi and Pashto (the primary languages of these books) should double-check, I think their opinions will not differ greatly from those, such as me, who can only comprehend these languages via written Urdu.
First: I examined science books for classes 1-12. These cover mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and computer science. Geology is taught from class 10 onward, an unusual addition, which implicitly recognises that Afghanistan’s future lies in mineral wealth. The expositions are clear and pleasing with systematically organised graphs and coloured illustrations. Although the end-of-chapter problems are simpler than in O-A level books, the content and quality compete well.
Pakistani textbooks are very different. For years my colleagues and I have begged our education authorities to drastically revise locally published textbooks. All are faulty in content, poor in pedagogy and badly presented. The reader is invited to revisit my Dawn article of 2015 titled ‘Burn these books please’, a failed attempt to bring the Sind Textbook Board to its senses.Such pleas proved fruitless and Pakistani school textbooks remain the world’s shoddiest. Dr Anjum Altaf, former Lums dean, recently analysed the Pre-I Mathematics Primer. Written under SNC guidelines, this was forced upon all schools, public and private, some weeks ago. To quote from his five-part page-by-page review, the Primer is “woefully inadequate and someone would have to try really hard to make anything worse. It is an unforgivable cruelty to have children subjected to it although some would surely survive it”.
Second: Recognising Afghanistan’s sectarian divides, and to prevent every mullah going his own way, Islamic Studies (Hanafi) is taught separately from Islamic Studies (Jafari). Religious matters are strictly kept out of secular subjects but the religious textbooks are comprehensive. They teach Quran, Seerat-un-Nabi (life of the Prophet [PBUH]), akhlaq (ethics), tafsir (interpretation), tajweed (pronunciation), fiqh (jurisprudence), etc. Special books for use in madressahs cover usual topics in math, science, English, and world history. But they are simpler and less detailed than those for ordinary schools.
This two-level system — and keeping religious matters confined to religious books — makes sense. But Pakistan’s SNC goes oppositely: religious topics permeate books teaching Urdu, English and general knowledge. Quite senselessly, madressahs and ordinary schools are yoked together. While all students should know how the modern world works, 99 per cent of madressah students will never use math or science professionally. So why use the same books and force students to take the same exams? This means the PTI government is shooting for a lowest common denominator, lower than even the existing one.
Third: In seeking to build an Afghan identity in a linguistically diverse country, former governments hit upon speakers of one language being taught the basics of another. Dari/Arabic script is used in classes 1-12 for teaching Pashto through Dari but, equally, Dari through Pashto. For classes (1-9), Dari and Pashto are also used for teaching regional languages: Balochi, Uzbek, Tajiki, Turkmen, Arabic and Pashayee.
In contrast, starting with Bengali, Pakistan has discouraged local language learning from 1947 onward. Where can one find an officially published book using Urdu to teach Sindhi, Pashto, Balochi, Punjabi, Hindko, Seraiki, Brahui, Shina or Kashmiri? Instead, Urdu is imposed upon all. But, quite comically, most political leaders and functionaries have insufficient grasp over any one language. Inadequate self-expression leads to their speaking an unpleasant mixture of English and Urdu often called Minglish/Urdish.One does not know who wrote and produced the hundreds and hundreds of officially authorised Afghan textbooks. Exceptions aside, names of authors are absent. But, with so much local content, they could not be foreigners. No credits or funding sources (was it USAID?) are given, perhaps for security reasons. To make the books more palatable, the stamped publication date for all books is set to Hijri-1398. This translates into 1978, the year before the Soviet invasion. But the high-quality electronic printing technology suggests they are very recent.
Will the current textbooks continue to be used in Talibanic Afghanistan? Very probably, yes! For one, history textbooks soft-pedal Taliban atrocities from 1996-2001. For another, Kabul’s warrior-rulers cannot create quality education material into the foreseeable future. Thousands of diligent, intelligent Afghan teachers and editors worked hard to produce that which presently exists. Most must have fled.
The governments of Karzai and Ghani were weak and corrupt. Even if “artificially nurtured and pumped up”, they have left behind a solid legacy for Afghanistan’s forthcoming generations. One cannot dismiss it all as foreign aid because Pakistan too has been the recipient of American aid for most of its history.
This suggests that Pakistan’s leaders — the prime minister and his education minister particularly — should study the Afghanistan model before they further dismantle the Pakistani education system. Their replacement, the SNC, will reduce quality further while keeping educational inequalities intact. Pakistan’s participation in the modern world will nosedive. But our national leaders only give orders. They do not think, listen, or read. Twenty years later, Pakistanis will ask: what legacy did these people leave behind?
https://theprint.in/opinion/i-compared-afghanistan-school-textbooks-with-pakistans-this-is-what-i-found/744721/

Sunday, October 3, 2021

Video - #Colbert #Comedy #Monologue Let's Not Reward Congress For Doing The Bare Minimum

Video Report - #DailyShow #TrevorNoah What Happens When a State Bans Abortions? - If You Don’t Know, Now You Know | The Daily Show

Video Report - Jim Acosta: Far-right is behind its own 'great replacement' theory

Video Report - #PostDocs #PandoraPapers What are the Pandora Papers?

Video Report - #PandoraPapers #OffshoreDataLeak - Pandora Papers: Biggest offshore data leak exposes leaders' hidden wealth

Music Video - Lokan Do Do Yaar Banaye = Afshan Zebi

Video Report - #Afghanistan #Taliban #KabulMosqueBlast Several killed in blast outside Kabul mosque

80 ہزار گھر اجڑنے پر آواز اٹھانے والی پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی… زندہ باد




حکومتی ترجمان اور میڈیا میں موجود ’سرکاری تجزیہ نگار‘ تسلسل سے مسلم لیگ (ن) میں بیانیہ کی بنیاد پر پیدا ہونے والے
 اختلافات کو پارٹی کے لئے مہلک قرار دیتے ہوئے پیش گوئی کرتے رہتے ہیں کہ یہ پارٹی انتخابات سے پہلے ہی کئی حصوں میں بٹ جائے گی۔ یہ تو غیر واضح ہے کہ بیانیہ کا اختلاف مسلم لیگ (ن) کے لئے کس قدر مہلک ثابت ہوتا ہے لیکن انتہاپسندی کے بارے میں ملک کی سب سے بڑی اپوزیشن پارٹی کی خاموشی ضرور یہ بتا رہی ہے کہ مسلم لیگ (ن) کی سیاست شدید اور سنگین خطرے سے دوچار ہو سکتی ہے۔ اگست میں افغانستان پر طالبان کے قبضے کے علاوہ اب وزیر اعظم عمران خان کی طرف سے تحریک طالبان پاکستان کے ساتھ مذاکرات کا اعلان اور یہ فیصلہ کہ ہتھیار پھینکنے والے دہشت گرد عناصر کو حکومت پاکستان عام معافی دے گی یعنی وہ انسانوں کے خلاف ہلاکت خیزی کے سنگین جرم سے بری ہوجائیں گے اور انہیں عام شہریوں کے طور پر زندہ رہنے اور سہولتوں سے استفادہ کرنے کا موقع دیا جائے گا۔ 

یہ دونوں معاملات پاکستان کی خارجہ پالیسی کے علاوہ ملکی سلامتی، سماجی اطمینان اور معاشی بحران کے حوالے سے انتہائی اہمیت رکھتے ہیں۔ افغانستان میں طالبان کے قبضہ کے بعد پیدا ہونے والی صورت حال میں وزیر اعظم عمران خان بھی یہ اعتراف کرتے رہتے ہیں کہ اگر امریکہ اور دیگر حلیف ممالک نے فوری طور سے افغانستان کی معاشی امداد بحال نہ کی تو یہ ملک شدید اقتصادی بحران کا شکار ہوجائے گا جس سے پاکستان براہ راست متاثر ہوگا۔ اس کے باوجود ملک سے صرف پیپلز پارٹی نے حکومت کی افغان پالیسی کے علاوہ تحریک طالبان پاکستان کو عام معافی دینے کے اعلانات پر احتجاج کیا ہے اور قومی اتفاق رائے پیدا کرنے کی ضرورت پر زور دیا ہے۔ مسلم لیگ (ن) اس وقت ملک کی سب سے بڑی اپوزیشن پارٹی ہے۔ پاکستان تحریک انصاف کے بعد یہی پارٹی سب سے بڑی ہے اور پنجاب میں تحریک انصاف کو انتخابی سطح پر چیلنج کرنے کا مسمم ارادہ رکھتی ہے۔ پارٹی کے صدر شہباز شریف اس وقت قومی اسمبلی میں اپوزیشن لیڈر ہیں جبکہ ان کے صاحبزادے اور پارٹی کے نائب صدر حمزہ شہباز پنجاب اسمبلی میں اپوزیشن لیڈر ہیں۔ اس کے باوجود افغانستان کے بحران، اس کے نتیجہ میں پیدا ہونے والی سیاسی و سفارتی بے چینی کے بعد اب پاکستان تحریک طالبان سے حکومتی مذاکرات اور اس گروہ سے متعلق دہشت گرد عناصر کو عام معافی دینے کے اعلانات پر مسلم لیگ (ن) کی قیادت مکمل طور سے خاموش ہے ۔ پارٹی نے ان اہم معاملات پر کسی قسم کا رد عمل دینا ضروری نہیں سمجھا۔ ملک کی اہم ترین اپوزیشن پارٹی کے اس رویہ سے یہی اندازہ کیا جاسکتا ہے کہ پارٹی ان دونوں معاملات پر کوئی خود مختارانہ رائے نہیں رکھتی اور حکومتی پالیسی کے بارے میں کسی قسم کے تحفظات کا اظہار ضروری نہیں سمجھتی۔ اس کے برعکس پیپلز پارٹی نے افغانستان پر طالبان کے قبضہ کے بعد پارلیمنٹ کو انگیج کرنے پر اصرار کیا تھا اور کہا تھا کہ اس بارے میں متوازن اور انسان دوست پالیسی اختیار کرنا ضروری ہے۔

 ترک ٹی وی کو انٹرویو دیتے ہوئے عمران خان نے تحریک طالبان پاکستان کے بعض عناصر کے ساتھ طالبان کی مدد سے افغانستان میں مذاکرات کا انکشاف کیا ہے۔ اس کے ساتھ ہی انہوں نے یہ بھی کہا ہے کہ اگر حکومت ٹی ٹی پی کے ساتھ کسی معاہدے پر پہنچی اور یہ لوگ ہتھیار پھینکنے پر آمادہ ہوگئے تو انہیں عام معافی دے دی جائے گی اور وہ عام شہریوں کے طور پر زندگی گزارنے کے مجاز ہوں گے۔ پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کے متعدد لیڈروں نے اس سرکاری پالیسی پر شدید رد عمل ظاہر کیا ہے اور مطالبہ کیا ہے کہ پارلیمنٹ کو اعتماد میں لئے بغیر اور اس اہم مسئلہ پر قومی مکالمہ کے بغیر حکومت کیسے ایک اہم مسئلہ پر یک طرفہ طور سے عام معافی کا اعلان کرسکتی ہے۔ یہ ایک جائز اور درست سیاسی مؤقف ہے جس میں نہ صرف حکومت کی کمزور حکمت عملی کی نشاندہی کی گئی ہے بلکہ یہ واضح کیا گیا ہے کہ ہزاروں پاکستانیوں کے قاتلوں کو معاف کرنے کا فیصلہ حکومت یا وزیر اعظم کسی سیاسی تنہائی میں نہیں کر سکتے۔ اگر یہ تصور کر لیا جائے کہ تحریک انصاف کی حکومت فوج کی سرپرستی میں مفسد عناصر کے ساتھ مکالمہ شروع کرنے اور انہیں معاف کرنے کا عندیہ دے رہے ہیں تو پیپلز پارٹی ہی کیوں اس خطرناک اور قومی مفاد کے برعکس فیصلہ کے خلاف آواز اٹھا رہی ہے۔ کیا ملک کی باقی سب سیاسی پارٹیوں کو اس طریقہ پر کوئی اعتراض نہیں ہے اور وہ قومی منظر نامہ پر دہشت گردوں کے ساتھ مفاہمانہ طرز عمل اختیار کرنے کے اثرات سے آگاہ نہیں ہیں۔ کیا ملک میں انتہا پسندی اور مذہبی بنیاد پر دہشت گردی صرف پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کا مسئلہ ہے۔ کیا یہ تصور کر لیا گیا ہے کہ پارٹی کی چئیر پرسن اور سابق وزیر اعظم بے نظیر بھٹو کی شہادت چونکہ ان عناصر کے ہاتھوں ہوئی تھی، اس لئے پیپلز پارٹی انفرادی ناراضی کی وجہ سے ٹی ٹی پی کے خلاف سخت مؤقف اختیار کررہی ہے، اس کا وسیع تر قومی مفاد سے کوئی تعلق نہیں۔ اس قیاس کو درست مان کر ایک اہم قومی مسئلہ پر خاموشی اختیار کرنا خاص طور سے مسلم لیگ (ن) جیسی بڑی پارٹی کا ناقابل قبول سیاسی طرز عمل ہے۔ اس کی دوسری وجہ یہ ہو سکتی ہے کہ مسلم لیگ (ن) اسٹبلشمنٹ کی خوشنودی کے لئے اس معاملہ پر خاموش ہو۔ اس کا خیال ہو کہ اگر تحریک انصاف کی حکومت عسکری عناصر کی خوشنودی سے ایک ناخوشگوار سیاسی فیصلہ کرتی ہے تو مسلم لیگ (ن) بعد میں اس کا سیاسی فائدہ اٹھا سکے گی۔ اس حوالے سے بھی مسلم لیگ (ن) کا سیاسی طریقہ افسوسناک حد تک قومی حساسیات سے نابلد ہونے کا مظہر ہے۔ 

 اس ملک کے 80 ہزار گھروں میں تحریک طالبان پاکستان کی دہشت گردی کا نشانہ بننے والے شہدا کے وارث رہتے ہیں۔ ان لوگوں کا دکھ درد پوری قوم کا سانجھا المیہ ہے۔ اس دہشت گردی نے پاکستانی سماج پر گہرے اثرات مرتب کئے ہیں اور ملک میں مذہبی انتہا پسندی کو فروغ ملا ہے۔ تحریک انصاف کی حکومت بالواسطہ طور سے مذہبی انتہا پسندی کو راسخ کرنے کا سبب بنتی رہی ہے اور اب ٹی ٹی پی کو عام معافی دے کر مصالحت کا ڈول ڈال کر معاشرے میں تشدد کی طرف رجوع کرنے والے عناصر کی حوصلہ افزائی کا اعلان کیا جا رہا ہے۔ ملک کی اہم ترین اپوزیشن پارٹی اس پہلو پر رائے دینے اور حکومت کو دباؤ میں لانے سے گریز کررہی ہے۔ اس کی ایک واضح وجہ یہ بھی ہوسکتی ہے کہ مسلم لیگ (ن) بھی تحریک طالبان پاکستان کے بارے میں اسٹبلشمنٹ کو خوش کرنے کے علاوہ خود بھی مذہبی انتہا پسندی کے بارے میں وہی رویہ رکھتی ہے جس کا اظہار عمران خان کی حکومت کررہی ہے۔ ایسے میں پیپلز پارٹی کے علاوہ شاید اے این پی مذہبی انتہا پسندی کے خلاف دیوار بننے کی کوشش کرے۔ مسلم لیگ (ن) اور دیگر مذہبی و نیم مذہبی سیاسی جماعتیں تمام تر تباہی اور انسانی جانوں کے ضیاع کے باوجود مذہب کے نام پر قتل و غارت کرنے والے عناصر کے بارے میں نرم گوشہ رکھتی ہیں تاکہ آئندہ انتخابی مہم میں اسے اپنی ’اسلام دوستی‘ کے طور پر پیش کرکے عوام کے ووٹ اینٹھنے کی کوشش کرسکیں۔ ستم ظریفی یہ ہے کہ پاکستان جمہوری تحریک نامی اپوزیشن اتحاد میں پیدا ہونے والے اختلافات کے بعد مسلم لیگ (ن) نے پیپلز پارٹی اور آصف زرادری پر اسٹبلشمنٹ کی ’بی‘ ٹیم ہونے کا الزام عائد کیا تھا اور دعویٰ کیا تھا کہ نواز شریف کے ’ووٹ کو عزت دو ‘ والے بیانیہ کے مقابلہ میں پیپلز پارٹی نے عسکری عناصر کے ساتھ مل کر سیاسی اقتدار کی راہ ہموار کرنے کی سازش کی ہے۔ تاہم المیہ یہ ہے افغانستان کی صورت حال کے بعد اب ٹی ٹی پی کے حوالے سے مسلم لیگ (ن) نے جو رویہ اختیار کیا ہے وہ درحقیقت اسٹبلشمنٹ کو راضی کرنے کی اپنی سی کوشش ہی ہے۔ 

 مسلم لیگ (ن) میں نواز شریف اور مریم نواز نے خود کو ’اینٹی اسٹبلشمنٹ‘ لیڈروں کے طور پر پیش کر رکھا ہے۔ نواز شریف یہ دعویٰ کرتے رہتے ہیں کہ سیاسی معاملات میں عسکری قیادت کی مداخلت ہی دراصل ملک کے حقیقی مسائل کی بنیاد ہے۔ اس دو ٹوک اور دلیرانہ مؤقف کے برعکس شہباز شریف مصالحت اور مل جل کر چلنے کی بات کرتے ہیں۔ ان کی سیاست کی پہچان ہی یہ اصول ہے کہ اسٹبلشمنٹ کو چیلنج کرنے کی بجائے، اس کی شرائط مان کر سیاسی اصول متعین کئے جائیں۔ اسی لئے حال ہی میں کنٹونمنٹ انتخابات میں مسلم لیگ (ن) نے شہباز شریف کی قیادت میں ’کارکردگی کو ووٹ دو ‘ کا نعرہ متعارف کروایا اور پنجاب کی حد تک کامیابی حاصل کی۔ مریم نواز اس دوران خاموش رہیں اور ’ووٹ کو عزت دو‘ کی گونج بھی سنائی نہیں دی۔ ان حالات میں دیکھا جا سکتا ہے کہ نواز شریف بھی سیاسی فائدے کے لئے دراصل وہی طریقہ اختیار کرنا چاہتے ہیں جو شہباز شریف سے منسوب کیا گیا ہے لیکن جمہوریت کے پاسبان ہونے کا دعویٰ کرتے ہوئے اسٹبلشمنٹ پر دباؤ بڑھانے اور بہتر شرائط تسلیم کروانے کی کوشش کی جاتی ہے۔ یعنی اول و آخر یہ جمہور کی بالادستی کی بجائے سیاسی اقتدار کے حصول کی جنگ ہے۔ تاہم ملک میں گزشتہ دو دہائی سے خوں ریزی کا سبب بننے والے عناصر کے بارے میں پیپلز پارٹی کا کھرا مؤقف اور مسلم لیگ (ن) کی خاموشی سے نواز شریف کے سیاسی بیانیہ کی حقیقت کھل کر سامنے آ رہی ہے۔ 

اگر انتہا پسند عناصر کے ساتھ مفاہمت پر لین دین کرکے سیاسی اقتدار حاصل کرنے کی کوشش کی جا رہی ہے تو یہ ملک و قوم کے مستقبل کے لئے بری خبر ہے۔ لیکن یہ راستہ مسلم لیگ (ن) کی مقبولیت کے لئے بھی کوئی اچھی خبر ثابت نہیں ہوگا۔ ملک کے جو جمہوریت پسند عناصر نواز شریف کے واضح سیاسی مؤقف کی وجہ سے ان کا ساتھ دے رہے تھے ، وہ اب پیپلز پارٹی 
کو ہی پاکستان میں متوازن جمہوری و روشن خیال سیاست کی واحد امید سمجھنے پر مجبور ہوں گے۔

https://www.humsub.com.pk/423020/syed-mujahid-ali-1923/

Support to Taliban: How A US Senate Bill Might Spell Trouble for Pakistan

 DR TARA KARTHA @kartha_tara

A version of the bill will go ahead, even while influential Pakistani circles work all levers to water it down.

Pakistan is again at war, but this time in the United States. The trigger is a bill introduced by some 22 Republican Senators, titled the 'Afghanistan Counterterrorism, Oversight, and Accountability Act'.
Apart from underlining the disastrous withdrawal of US troops, the bill also intends to “impose sanctions on the Taliban and entities and countries supporting it”. That in itself is enough to create an “Uh Oh!” moment in Rawalpindi, basking in its victory in getting its proxies into power. But, there’s more and enough to cause consternation among the politicians as well, as the Karachi Stock index took a dive on the news.This, and other developments could mark a portent of things to come, with palpable anger in Capitol Hill at the extreme humiliation thrust on US troops.
The Senate Bill – Dealing With the Withdrawal
First, the comprehensive bill covers very many sensitive issues. Since its tabled by the Republicans, including by Mitt Romney who ran for President against Barrack Obama, it naturally has no reference to why US troops left at all. As one Senator put it “That ship has sailed”.It, however, does question the manner of withdrawal and the effects of it, calling for a State Department Task Force to concentrate on evacuation of American citizens and permanent residents. The number seems to have been at between 10,000-15,000 before the Taliban swept in. Just 6,000 were evacuated. That means there are many Americans who are in serious danger. Then there are the loyal Afghans who stood by the US and are now is serious danger.It must be reminded that all records of who did what are held by the Interior Ministry presided over by Sirajuddin Haqqani, a terrorist with a $5 million bounty on his head. It’s the worst possible outcome for all concerned, and the bill underlines that clearly and unambiguously.
The bill also recalls the Taliban “as a specially designated global terrorist under part 594 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations” and related laws. It then calls for a complete ban on the Taliban representatives being recognised at the UN General Assembly or in any other agency, with the US using its influence towards this.
The bill recommends sanctions against the Taliban, listing out its humanitarian obliviousness and its various acts of violence. In a separate section, it demands that the USG also provide details of not only all defence articles left behind by hastily withdrawn forces – which included 75,898 vehicles, 5,99,690 weapons, 1,62,643 pieces of communications equipment, 208 aircraft, and 16,191 pieces of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance equipment, several thousands of assault rifles and at least 20,000 grenades – but also a strategy to recover them.
That’s going to be tough, since it seems that a considerable amount would already have made it across borders, particularly into the weapons markets of Pakistan.
A whole section also demands clear counter-terrorism goals, and a call for an assessment of US ability to detect and counter-terrorist threats with an over the horizon capability. It is something which is lacking at the moment, and was made more than clear with the attack against an alleged Islamic State target that tragically turned out to be on an Afghan family. What is interesting for New Delhi, is the section on the region. That section calls for the president to report to an appropriate committee on not just what Russia and China are up to in these countries, but also on matters “including border disputes with South and Central Asian countries that border the People’s Republic of China”.
If that’s not enough, it goes on further to say that the US should identify areas of diplomatic, economic and defence cooperation with India to address the challenges posed by these countries, and an assessment of how it has affected India’s cooperation with the US” .
That’s pretty heavy language, and is in itself enough to make Rawalpindi hit the ceiling. But there's more, much more.
Pakistan in the Dock
An entire section is focused almost exclusively on Pakistan. The bill demands a thorough survey of all covert assistance given by that country from 2001 onwards, but more specifically the provision of sanctuary space, financial support, intelligence support, logistics and medical support, training, equipping, and most importantly, the tactical, operational, or strategic direction that emanated from Pakistan.That such direction was available was apparent from the military precision with which the entire campaign was conducted, including the show of hesitation in entering Kabul ostensibly to avoid casualties.
Interestingly, the bill would also make it mandatory for the US government to provide details on the Pakistani involvement in the Panjshir operation that not just killed civilians in the area, but also seemed to have involved use of foreign air support in the form of UAV flights. The bill makes it mandatory for the US government to also report what it did to ‘curtail’ such support. That answer would be just one word: Nothing.
Sanctions to Follow
Worse is to follow. The section on Sanctions demands that the USG similarly report to Congress on the “assistance provided to or through the government of any country or any organization providing any form of material support to the Taliban”. That means not just the government of Pakistan, but also the various bodies like the Madrassa Haqqania in Akora Khattak , as well all extremist organisations at present revelling in the Taliban victory and falling over themselves to reach Kabul.
This is followed by further details of sanctions on anyone providing paramilitary or military support, or intelligence or logistical support to the Taliban or any terrorist group operating – that last is interesting since it clearly has a broad sweep to include the Lahskar-e-Tayyba and its friends and affiliates. This particular clause is clearly related to Pakistan, and its intelligence agencies. Further are other clauses against drug trafficking, and related areas. Worse still, is the demand of stoppage of all foreign assistance to those entities or countries supporting the Taliban. Keep in mind that the US is still the largest aid donor to Pakistan, and you get the picture. The bill is in sum, not just a Republican repartee, but a synthesis of the frustration that is apparent as criticism mounts on the nature of US withdrawal, the victorious return of the Taliban, and the ‘in your face’ triumphalism evident in Islamabad.
That anger that cuts across party lines, and is made worse as Congress hears US Generals discuss the sorry details of the Afghan withdrawal Most unusually, commentaries are now being seen in the Washington press on the toxicity of the ‘ally’ that is Pakistan.
The bill is certainly at very early stages yet. However, it cannot be ignored in its entirety, since it raises very valid questions and requirements that relate not only to Pakistan, but the Afghan situation as a whole, and most vitally, the ability of the US to protect its homeland from the rising terrorist presence in Afghanistan. A version will go ahead, even while influential Pakistani circles work all levers to water it down. But it will gain pace, as the US grapples with the world wide loss of face that it has incurred in its hasty exit from a country that does not deserve the Taliban or its masters.
https://www.thequint.com/uttar-pradesh-elections/lakhimpur-kheri-violence-farmers-killed

#PandoraScandal - Prime Minister Imran Khan promised ‘new Pakistan’ but members of his inner circle secretly moved millions offshore

By Margot Gibbs and Malia Politzer
Leak shows a key ally tried to bypass tax authorities and political and military elites bought luxury apartments and set up shell companies.
In 2018, Imran Khan, the Pakistani cricketing legend turned anti-corruption campaigner finally broke through.
After more than two decades in the political wilderness, the charismatic Oxford-educated media star seized on the publication of the Panama Papers, the 2016 journalistic exposé that revealed the offshore secrets of the global elite. Among the findings: The children of Pakistan’s sitting prime minister secretly owned a string of luxury London apartments.
Riding a wave of public outrage, Khan led protests around the country and a sit-in at the residence of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, demanding that he step down. With the support of the military establishment, Khan propelled his reformist party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), or Pakistan Movement for Justice, past its rivals in the 2018 national elections and propelled himself into the prime minister’s office in Islamabad.
In a televised victory speech, Khan promised a new era.
“We will establish supremacy of the law,” he said. “Whoever violates the law, we will act against them. Our state institutions will be so strong that they will stop corruption. Accountability will start with me, then my ministers, and then it will go from there.”
Now leaked documents reveal that key members of Khan’s inner circle, including cabinet ministers, their families and major financial backers have secretly owned an array of companies and trusts holding millions of dollars of hidden wealth. Military leaders have been implicated as well. The documents contain no suggestion that Khan himself owns offshore companies.
Among those whose holdings have been exposed are Khan’s finance minister, Shaukat Fayaz Ahmed Tarin, and his family, and the son of Khan’s former adviser for finance and revenue, Waqar Masood Khan. The records also reveal the offshore dealings of a top PTI donor, Arif Naqvi, who is facing fraud charges in the United States.
The files show how Chaudhry Moonis Elahi, a key political ally of Imran Khan’s, planned to put the proceeds from an allegedly corrupt business deal into a secret trust, concealing them from Pakistan’s tax authorities. Elahi did not respond to ICIJ’s repeated requests for comment. Today, a family spokesman told ICIJ’s media partners that, “due to political victimisation misleading interpretations and data have been circulated in files for nefarious reasons.” He added that the family’s assets “are declared as per applicable law”.
In one of several offshore holdings involving military leaders and their families, a luxury London apartment was transferred from the son of a famous Indian movie director to the wife of a three-star general. The general told ICIJ the property purchase was disclosed and proper; his wife didn’t reply.
The revelations are part of the Pandora Papers, a new global investigation into the shadowy offshore financial system that allows multinational corporations, the rich, famous and powerful to avoid taxes and otherwise shield their wealth. The probe is based on more than 11.9 million confidential files from 14 offshore services firms leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and shared with 150 news organizations around the world.
The window into the personal finances of individual Pakistani generals is especially rare and provides a glimpse at how top military officers – known in Pakistan as “The Establishment” – use offshore to quietly enrich themselves while maintaining, until now, the military’s image as a bulwark against civilian corruption.
In the 48 hours leading up to the publication of the Pandora Papers, a Pakistani television station, ARY-News, reported that, “the owner of two offshore companies registered at a similar address as of Prime Minister Imran Khan has revealed that they were registered by him on a different address and denied any role of the premier in this regard.” The story also attributed the information to “a database of the offshore companies.” ARY-News is not an ICIJ partner and doesn’t have access to ICIJ data.
In its reporting prior to publication, ICIJ had asked Khan about the same companies. A Khan spokesman told ICIJ that the prime minister had no link to either, adding that two houses in the same neighborhood share an address, providing a map as evidence. The spokesman also told ARY-News that Khan denied any connection to the companies, adding that their owner “never met Imran Khan face to face and it may however be possible that they had attended an extended family function.”
The Pandora Papers investigation exposes civilian government and military leaders who have been hiding vast amounts of wealth in a country plagued by widespread poverty and tax avoidance.The newly leaked records reveal the use of offshore services by Pakistan’s elites that rivals the findings of the Panama Papers, which led to Sharif’s downfall and helped propel Imran Khan to power three years ago. Today, a few hours before the Pandora Papers’ publication, Khan’s spokesperson told a press conference that the prime minister, “has no offshore company but if any of his ministers [or] advisers have it will be their individual acts and they will have to be held accountable.”
An unaccountable military elite
Khan’s anti-corruption rhetoric resonated in Pakistan, where the military has pointed to what it calls the corruption and ineptitude of civilian politicians to justify overthrowing democratically elected governments three times since the country’s founding in 1947. Military autocracies have ruled Pakistan for almost half the country’s history. They have been bolstered by support from the U.S and NATO countries, which have relied on Pakistan’s support as a bulwark against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and, later, the Taliban.
The military also claims legitimacy as the nation’s protector against longtime adversary and nuclear rival India.
Over the decades, the military and its secretive spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence, have repeatedly stoked anti-India animus, even at the cost of angering Pakistan’s Western allies.
Foreign policy analysts have accused the military of playing a double game, receiving billions of dollars in U.S military support while continuing to work with members of the Afghan Taliban.
One legacy of colonial rule is the military’s wealth. The military’s combined business holdings amount to Pakistan’s largest conglomerate, and it controls 12% of the country’s land. Many of the landholdings are owned by current or former senior leaders.
The Pandora Papers reveal that in 2007, the wife of Gen. Shafaat Ullah Shah, then one of Pakistan’s leading generals and a former aide to President Pervez Musharraf, acquired a $1.2 million apartment in London through a discreet offshore transaction.
The property was transferred to Gen. Shah’s wife by an offshore company owned by Akbar Asif, a wealthy businessman who has opened restaurants in London and Dubai. Asif is the son of the Indian film director K Asif. The younger Asif once met with Musharraf at London’s Dorchester Hotel to ask for an exception to Pakistan’s 40-year ban on Indian films to allow the release there of one of his father’s most acclaimed movies. Musharraf granted the exception and later lifted the ban.
The leaked documents show that Asif has owned a multimillion-dollar property portfolio through a web of offshore companies.
One of those companies, called Talah Ltd. and registered in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), was used to transfer the London apartment to Shafaat Shah’s wife. Talah bought an apartment near the Canary Wharf financial district in 2006. The next year, Asif transferred ownership of the company to Fariha Shah.
Asif’s sister, Heena Kausar, is the widow of Iqbal Mirchi, a senior figure in a leading organised crime group, D-company. Mirchi was at the time under sanction as a drug trafficker by the U.S. Before his death in 2013, Mirchi was one of India’s most wanted men.
Gen. Shah told ICIJ that the purchase of the London apartment had been made through a former army colleague then acting as a consultant to London real estate firms, not through any personal connection to Asif. Gen. Shah said the flat “was named” to his wife because “I already had properties in my name while she did not have any and to balance tax deductions.”
Shah said that his wife has never met Asif and that he met him just once, while an aide to Musharaff, when Asif briefly lobbied the president for his father’s film “in the corridors of Dorchester Hotel when he had accompanied the hairstylist, who had come to cut Mrs Musharraf’s hair.” Insights into the private wealth of top military officers and their families are exceedingly rare; journalists who have written about the military within Pakistan have been jailed, tortured and killed.
The Pandora Papers also reveal that Raja Nadir Pervez, a retired army lieutenant colonel and former government minister, owned International Finance & Equipment Ltd, a BVI-registered company. In the leaked files, the firm is involved in machinery and related businesses in India, Thailand, Russia and China. Records show that in 2003, Pervez transferred his shares in the company to a trust that controls several offshore companies.
One of the trust’s beneficiaries is a British arms dealer. According to U.K. court documents, one of the trust’s other companies has helped broker arms sales from Belgian manufacturer FN Herstal SA to Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., a state-owned Indian defense company.
While he owned International Finance & Equipment, Pervez also held several high-level positions in Pakistan’s government. He was elected to the National Assembly in 1985 and later joined Khan’s party. Pervez did not respond to reporters’ questions.
Another influential former military leader who shows up in the leaked documents is Maj. Gen. Nusrat Naeem, the ISI’s onetime director general of counterintelligence. He owned a BVI company, Afghan Oil & Gas Ltd, that was registered in 2009, shortly after his retirement. He said that the company had been set up by a friend and that he didn’t use it for any financial transactions.
Islamabad police later charged Naeem with fraud related to the attempted purchase of a steel mill for $1.7 million. The case was dropped.
The Pandora Papers also bring to light the notable offshore holdings of close relatives of three senior military figures.
Umar and Ahad Khattak, sons of the former head of Pakistan’s air force, Abbas Khattak, in 2010 registered a BVI company to invest what documents call “family business earnings” in stocks, bonds, mutual funds and real estate.
The Khattaks did not respond to reporters’ questions.
In an example involving intergenerational wealth transfer, Shahnaz Sajjad Ahmad inherited a fortune from her father, a retired lieutenant general, through an offshore trust that owns two London apartments, purchased in 1997 and 2011 in Knightsbridge, a short walk from Harrods. She, in turn, set up a trust for her daughters in 2003 in Guernsey, a tax haven in the English Channel. Her father was a favorite of Field Marshal Mohammad Ayub Khan, the country’s first military dictator (1958-1969). After her father retired from the army, he founded one of Pakistan’s biggest business conglomerates. Ayub Khan’s son later married into the family and sits on the boards of several of the group’s businesses.
Shahnaz did not respond to ICIJ’s requests for comment.
Taken together, the findings offer a portrait of an unaccountable military elite with extensive personal and family offshore holdings.
‘A defining moment’
As Pakistan’s ultimate political arbiter, the military would eventually test Imran Khan’s reformist ideals.
Born in 1952, Khan was the son of a Lahore civil engineer, and he enjoyed the privileges of Pakistan’s insular, and insulated, upper class. When the electricity failed, elites could turn on generators. If hospitals were substandard, they flew abroad for care. “I was from that privileged class that was not affected by the general deterioration in the country,” Khan wrote in his 2011 autobiography, “Pakistan: A Personal History”.
Khan’s elite boarding school, Aitchison College, was named for the colonial administrator who founded it. Lessons were in English; boys caught speaking Urdu during school hours were fined.
The education system replicated colonial values, Khan wrote, teaching elites that they should “look upon the masses with contempt” and that “the natives were not to be trusted.”
As a young man, he befriended future leaders of Pakistan, meeting Nawaz Sharif at a cricket club, stopping by for Sunday cheese and canape parties at the Oxford University lodgings of another future Pakistani prime minister, Benazir Bhutto. He also developed a reputation as a playboy and a denizen of London’s nightclubs.
Khan played his first cricket match for Pakistan’s national team in 1971, when he was just 18, became captain at the age of 29 and, 10 years later, led the team to victory in the 1992 World Cup. In a country passionate about cricket, Khan’s athletic feats made him a national hero – and drew the attention of politicians hoping to capitalize on his popularity. Two of the Pakistan’s military leaders – Generals Musharraf and Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq – and Sharif, the three-time civilian prime minister, invited him to join their governments. He refused them all, later declaring in his autobiography that each administration was either incompetent or corrupt.
He wrote that he entered politics after the experience of building a cancer hospital in his mother’s memory in 1994 left him stunned both by the generosity of ordinary Pakistanis and the failings of their government: “I discovered how hard it was to achieve anything in Pakistan while also battling bureaucracy and corruption.”
In 1996, Khan founded the PTI party, vowing to root out corruption, address wealth inequality and break the hold of the country’s two political dynasties – those of the Bhutto and Sharif families – which he claimed ruled Pakistan like a “fiefdom.”
Among the early targets of Khan’s anti-corruption campaign was another powerful family, the Elahis, known in Pakistan as the Chaudhrys of Gujrat.
After Musharraf forcibly ousted Prime Minister Sharif in 1999, during his second term, Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, a prominent political figure, organized the Pakistan Muslim League-Q to support the coup. The PML-Q, known for backing Pakistan’s military governments, remains closely aligned with the military.
Over the years Pakistan’s anti-corruption agencies have launched and dropped several investigations into his business dealings. Around 2002, Khan petitioned the national bank to investigate loans to Elahi’s company which had allegedly been written off. At one point he called him “the biggest dacoit in Punjab,” using an Urdu word for “bandit.” Despite being a national hero and benefiting from well-funded campaigns powered by the enthusiastic support of Pakistanis abroad, Khan remained a political outsider, in part because he refused to make alliances with forces he called corrupt. Middle-class and other reform-minded voters flocked to his 2013 campaign, waving cricket bats. And Khan gained a powerful ally: the military, then in a power struggle with both mainstream civilian factions. But the PTI gained just 35 of the 342 seats in the National Assembly that year.
Then came the Panama Papers.
The revelations about then-Prime Minister Sharif and his family’s London real estate holdings, followed by the discovery that his oldest daughter forged documents in an attempt to cover up her ownership, played perfectly to Khan’s anti-corruption message and turbocharged his political fortunes. “’The leaks are God-sent,” Khan said at the time. Taking stock of the impact on the country’s ruling elite a year later, he declared, “This is a defining moment in the history of Pakistan.”
Pakistan’s Supreme Court soon disqualified Sharif from office for falling short of constitutional requirements to be “truthful and trustworthy.” The ISI was involved in the investigation of Sharif. He was later sentenced to 10 years in prison on related corruption charges.
In the 2018 elections, Khan’s PTI secured a fourfold increase in National Assembly seats, bringing the party to the brink of power. Throngs of his supporters danced outside the party’s headquarters in Islamabad. But Khan hadn’t won the outright majority and needed to form a government. Sharif and Bhutto’s parties, the target of years of his attacks, were not an option. That left a coalition of smaller parties, led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Q, the Elahis’ party. Khan made the deal.
A fateful political alliance
Since taking office, Khan has continued to deploy anti-corruption rhetoric and rail against elites who, he has said on Twitter, “come to power and plunder the country.” But analysts say Khan has disappointed his reform-minded supporters and has become widely viewed as a figurehead. “He doesn’t have a problem with the military ruling the country while they pretend that he’s in charge,” Aqil Shah, a visiting academic at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,told ICIJ.
Khan’s spokesperson, Shabhaz Gill, told ICIJ that the “PTI believed in the separation of powers,” and the military came under the power of the executive branch of the state.
The Pandora Papers reveal that Khan has surrounded himself with people – cabinet ministers and their families, donors and other political allies – who have holdings hidden offshore.
Shaukat Tarin, Khan’s finance minister, and members of Tarin’s family, own four offshore companies. According to Tariq Fawad Malik, a financial consultant who handled the paperwork on the companies, they were set up as part of the Tarin family’s intended investment in a bank with a Saudi business. He said that, “as a mandatory prerequisite by [the] regulator, we engaged with the Central Bank of Pakistan to obtain their ’in-principle’ approval for the said strategic investment.” The deal didn’t proceed.
Tarin didn’t respond to ICIJ’s questions. In a statement issued the day of the Pandora Papers’ publication, Tarin said: “The off-shore companies mentioned were incorporated as part of the fund raising process for my Bank.”
Omer Bakhtyar, the brother of Khan’s minister for industries, Makhdum Khusro Bakhtyar, transferred a $1 million apartment in the Chelsea area of London to his elderly mother through an offshore company in 2018. The state anti-corruption agency has been investigating allegations that his family’s wealth inexplicably “ballooned” since Bhaktyar first became a minister in Pervez Musharaff’s government in 2004.
In a written statement to ICIJ, Makhdum Bakhtyar said that the anti-corruption agency’s investigation was founded on baseless allegations which had underestimated his family’s past wealth, and that it has so far not resulted in a formal complaint.
The son of Waqar Masood Khan, Khan’s chief adviser for finance and revenue between 2019 and 2020, co-owned a company based in the British Virgin Islands. Masood resigned in August amid a policy dispute. Khan told ICIJ that he did not know what his son’s company did. He said his son lived a modest life, and was not his financial dependent. And Khan’s former minister for water resources, Faisal Vawda, set up an offshore company in 2012 to invest in U.K. properties, the Pandora Papers show. He resigned in March amid a controversy over his status as a dual U.S.-Pakistan national. Vawda told ICIJ that he has declared all worldwide assets held in his name to Pakistani tax authorities.
Gill, Khan’s spokesperson, said that Khan had passed an executive order requiring unelected members of his cabinet to declare their assets, in addition to the asset disclosures already required of members of the National Assembly under Pakistani law.
Khan’s financial backers are also prominent in the files.
https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/pakistan-imran-khan-prime-minister-allies-offshore/

Saturday, October 2, 2021

Music Video - Wham! - Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go

Video Report - 10/01/21: Press Briefing by White House COVID-19 Response Team and Public Health Officials

Video Report - #AbortionRights #AbortionIsAWomansRight - ‘My body, my choice’: Abortion rights protesters hit US streets

#AbortionIsAWomansRight - Supporters of Abortion Rights, at Nationwide Marches, Try to Regain Momentum

By Lisa Lerer and Campbell Robertson
A nationwide march for abortion rights on Saturday offered an early test of Democratic enthusiasm in the post-Trump era.
Last fall, Hannah Dasgupta spent her days focused on politics, channeling her fear and anger over President Donald J. Trump into activism. Worried about the future of abortion rights, among other issues, during the Trump administration, she joined a group of suburban Ohio women who were working to elect Democrats.A year later, Ms. Dasgupta, 37, still cares just as deeply about those issues. But she did not attend a nationwide women’s march for abortion rights on Saturday. In fact, she hadn’t even heard about it.
“I don’t watch the news every single night anymore — I’m just not nearly as concerned,” said Ms. Dasgupta, a personal trainer and school aide, who was devoting her attention to local issues like her school board. “When Biden finally got sworn in, I was like, ‘I’m out for a little while.’”
Ms. Dasgupta’s inattention underscores one of the biggest challenges facing the Democratic Party as it turns toward the midterm elections. At a moment when abortion rights face their most significant challenge in nearly half a century, a portion of the Democratic grass roots wants to take, in Ms. Dasgupta’s words, “a long breather.”
The march on Saturday, sponsored by a coalition of nearly 200 civil rights, abortion rights and liberal organizations, offered an early test of Democratic enthusiasm in the post-Trump era, particularly for the legions of newly politically engaged women who helped the party win control of Congress and the White House.
In 2017, the first Women’s March drew an estimated four million protesters into streets across the country to voice their outrage at the inauguration of Mr. Trump. Many listed abortion rights as a motivating issue, according to surveys of participants. Since then, the annual events have drawn smaller crowds, and the organizers have found themselves dogged by controversies and internal strife.
Organizers of the abortion rights march said that while this year’s larger events attracted tens of thousands, rather than the millions who protested during the Trump administration, the geographic scope of the gatherings — more than 650 marches in 50 states — demonstrated the breadth of their movement. They cast the marches as the earliest stages of a renewed fight, one intended to remind voters that the change in the White House did not stop efforts to restrict abortion rights and access.
In the first six months of the Biden administration, more abortion restrictions were enacted by state legislatures than in any previous year, according to an analysis by the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights.
“No matter where you live, no matter where you are, this fight is at your doorstep right now,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, president and chief executive of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “The moment is dark.”
Still, the march in downtown Washington struck an almost celebratory tone, as protesters stretching a city block cheered, chanted and waved their homemade signs as they marched to the steps of the Supreme Court. In Austin, Texas, thousands of participants packed elbow to elbow across the sweeping lawn in front of the State Capitol. Smaller marches spread throughout the country, with protesters organizing events from Great Falls, Mont., to the retirement community of The Villages in Sumter County, Fla., where attendees decorated their golf carts with pink signs. “We’re the largest and longest-running protest movement in the country,” said Rachel O’Leary Carmona, executive director of the Women’s March, which organized the events. “For some reason, folks are willing to discount the actions of 250,000 women because it’s less than the highest ever.” In Austin, Leslie Ellis said the severity of Texas’ new abortion law had prompted her to participate in her first abortion rally.
“It’s crazy that women are having to fight for their reproductive rights,” said Ms. Ellis, a dog groomer from New Braunfels. “It’s a constitutional right to have body autonomy.”Those who did not attend cited varied reasons: the coronavirus pandemic; a sense of political fatigue after a divisive election; other issues that seemed more pressing than abortion, such as racial justice or transgender rights.
“There would have been a time when a march like this would have been a three-generational event,” said Celinda Lake, a Democratic pollster who advises the White House and the Democratic Party. “Now, the 8-year-old girl isn’t vaccinated, and you’re scared that Mom could get sick. People are just exhausted, and they’re deliberately checking out.”
Even as Democrats see the struggle over abortion rights as a winning political fight, party strategists worry that a decline in enthusiasm could be another harbinger of what’s expected to be a difficult midterm election next year for their party.
Already, Democrats find themselves struggling to respond to a series of public health, economic and foreign policy crises. As party factions bicker and Mr. Biden’s approval ratings sink, his domestic agenda remains mired in a legislative standoff in Congress. Other issues that would motivate the Democratic base, including legislation that could enact abortion rights into federal law, face an uphill climb to passage given the party’s razor-thin congressional margins.
In interviews and polling, voters who believe abortion should remain legal say they worry about the future of abortion rights and say that restrictions, such as a new law in Texas that effectively bans abortions after about six weeks, make them more likely to vote in the midterm elections.
But they are also skeptical that the constitutional right to an abortion will be completely overturned and view managing the pandemic as far more urgent. And some of those who became activists during the Trump administration now prefer to focus on state and local politics, where they see more opportunities to enact change. Other solutions to protect abortion rights proposed by liberal groups — including an expansion of the Supreme Court — remain divisive among independent voters.
Judy Hines, a retired gym teacher in a conservative rural county in western Pennsylvania who is active in Democratic politics, has not been to a march in more than a year and a half, and since she has a family member with health issues, she did not attend on Saturday either.
“I’m hoping that the fight is still in people, but it’s not,” she said. “We see our Supreme Court. We know how they’re going to vote.”
Abortion rights advocates warn that this is no time for complacency. The Supreme Court is preparing to take up an abortion case — the first to be argued before the court with all three of Mr. Trump’s conservative appointees — that has the potential to remove federal protection for abortion altogether. “We have almost 50 years of legal abortion,” said Amy Hagstrom Miller, the chief executive at Whole Woman’s Health, which operates four clinics in Texas. “People don’t believe it could roll back.”
Some advocates believe voters will become more engaged as bills similar to the Texas law are passed by other Republican-controlled state legislatures. Aimee Arrambide, the executive director of Avow Texas, an abortion rights organization in Austin, struggled to generate attention when the Texas law was first introduced. Since the bill became law last month, her organization has collected $120,000 in donations, an amount that would normally take six months to raise.
“It’s a little frustrating, because we’ve been kind of sounding the alarm for years, and nobody was really paying attention,” she said. “People are realizing that the threat is real.” For decades, opponents of abortion rights have attracted large crowds to the National Mall in Washington for the March for Life, an event that features high-profile conservative politicians and religious leaders. On Monday, thousands gathered outside the Pennsylvania Capitol in Harrisburg urging the passage of anti-abortion legislation.
The liberal movement that exploded into the streets in 2017 was led and fueled by women, many of them college-educated and often middle-aged. They gathered for huge marches and almost weekly protests, huddling to discuss door-knocking strategies in exurban Paneras and founding new Democratic groups in tiny, historically conservative towns. Many of the marchers came to these events with their own parcel of pressing issues, but surveys showed the issue that the persistent protesters most had in common was abortion rights, said Dana R. Fisher, a sociology professor at the University of Maryland who has conducted surveys among activist groups and at large marches. Those motivations began to change in the past two years. As the threat of Covid-19 kept many of the older activists home, the killing of George Floyd at the hands of the police in May 2020 ignited an even larger wave of demonstrations nationwide, which were fueled by younger crowds motivated by a different set of issues.
In surveys conducted at marches following the killing of Mr. Floyd, as well as among organizers of last year’s Earth Day demonstration, the percentages of people citing abortion rights as a key motivator for activism were much lower, Ms. Fisher said.
Liz Fields, 45, said she had attended the march in Washington to express her frustration with a Supreme Court she believes is robbing women of their rights. Her husband, who joined her for protests on other issues over the summer, stayed home.
“I don’t want to say he doesn’t believe in this, but abortion is just such a fraught issue,” she said.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/02/us/politics/abortion-rights-march.html

Women’s March Targets Abortion Access On Steps Of Supreme Court

Ellen Knickmeyer
At an unrelated event, GOP Sen. Susan Collins said she’s working to make Roe v. Wade “the law of the land.”
The first Women’s March of the Biden administration headed straight for the steps of the Supreme Court on Saturday, part of nationwide protests that drew thousands to Washington to demand continued access to abortion in a year when conservative lawmakers and judges have put it in jeopardy. Demonstrators filled the streets surrounding the court, shouting “My body, my choice” and cheering loudly to the beat of drums.
Before heading out on the march, they rallied in a square near the White House, waving signs that said “Mind your own uterus,” “I love someone who had an abortion” and “Abortion is a personal choice, not a legal debate,” among other messages. Some wore T-shirts reading simply “1973,” a reference to the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, which made abortion legal for generations of American women.Elaine Baijal, a 19-year-old student at American University, said her mother told her of coming to a march for legal abortion with her own mother in the 1970s. “It’s sad that we still have to fight for our right 40 years later. But it’s a tradition I want to continue,” Baijal said of the march. Organizers say the Washington march was among hundreds of abortion-themed protests held around the country Saturday. The demonstrations took place two days before the start of a new term for the Supreme Court that will decide the future of abortion rights in the United States, after appointments of justices by President Donald Trump strengthened conservative control of the high court.
“Shame, shame, shame!” marchers chanted while walking past the Trump International Hotel on their way to the Supreme Court. Some booed and waived their fists at the Trump landmark.
The day before the march, the Biden administration urged a federal judge to block the nation’s most restrictive abortion law, which has banned most abortions in Texas since early September. It’s one of a series of cases that will give the nation’s divided high court occasion to uphold or overrule Roe v. Wade.
The Texas law motivated many of the demonstrators and speakers.
“We’re going to keep giving it to Texas,” Marsha Jones of the Afiya Center for Black women’s health care in Dallas, pledged to the Washington crowd. “You can no longer tell us what to do with our bodies!”
Alexis McGill Johnson, the president of Planned Parenthood nationally, told of women forced to drive many hours across state lines — sometimes multiple state lines — to end pregnancies in the weeks since the Texas law went into effect.“The moment is dark ... but that is why we are here,” Johnson told the crowd packed into Freedom Square and surrounding streets. With the upcoming Supreme Court term, “No matter where you are, this fight is at your doorstep right now.”In Springfield, Illinois, several hundred people rallied on the Old State Capitol square. Prominent among them were the Illinois Handmaids, wearing red robes and white bonnets reminiscent of the automatons of Margaret Atwood’s classic tale and carrying signs that said, “Mind Your Own Uterus” and “Mother By Choice.”
Brigid Leahy, senior director of public policy for Planned Parenthood of Illinois, said just two days after the Texas restrictions took effect, Planned Parenthood saw the first women from Texas traveling to Illinois for the procedure, with more following since.
“They are trying to figure out paying for airfare or gas or a train ticket, they may need hotel and meals. ...,” Leahy said. “They have to figure out time off of work, and they have to figure out child care. This can be a real struggle.” With a sign reading “Not this again” attached to a clothes hangar, Gretchen Snow of Bloomington, Illinois, said, “Women need to be safe and they need to not have to worry about how much money they have to be safe.”
On the West Coast, thousands marched through downtown Los Angeles to a rally in front of City Hall. Protesters chanted “Abortion on demand and without apology: only revolution can make women free!”
Kayla Selsi said she was carrying the same sign she has held in three past Women’s Marches. It stated, “If only my vagina could shoot bullets, it will be less regulated.”
“Unfortunately, I can’t retire this sign,” Selsi said. “Women’s rights are being taken away, and it’s highly affecting women of lower class.”
“I feel safer in California as a woman, but Texas is obviously going in one direction and it scares me that other states could go the same way,” she said.
In New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul spoke at rallies in Seneca Falls and then Albany. “I’m sick and tired of having to fight over abortion rights,” she said. “It’s settled law in the nation and you are not taking that right away from us, not now not ever.”
At an unrelated event in Maine, Republican Sen. Susan Collins called the Texas law “extreme, inhumane and unconstitutional” and said she’s working to make Roe v. Wade the “law of the land.”
She said she’s working with two Democrats and another Republican, and they’re “vetting” the language of their bill. Collins declined to identify her colleagues, but said the legislation will be introduced soon.
A participant holds a wire hanger reading "Warning: This is not a surgical instrument" in Los Angeles. An opponent of women’s access to abortion called this year’s march theme “macabre.”
“What about equal rights for unborn women?” tweeted Jeanne Mancini, president of an anti-abortion group called March for Life.
The Women’s March has become a regular event — although interrupted by the coronavirus pandemic — since millions of women turned out in the United States and around the world the day after the January 2017 inauguration of Trump. Trump endorsed punishing women for getting abortions and made appointment of conservative judges a mission of his presidency.
With the sun beating down in Washington on Saturday, Ramsay Teviotdale of Arlington, Virginia — who when asked her age said she was “old enough to remember when abortion wasn’t legal” — was one of the few wearing the hand-knitted pink wool caps that distinguished the 2017 Women’s March.
Without Trump as a central figure for women of varied political beliefs to rally against, and with the pandemic still going strong, organizers talked of hundreds of thousands of participants nationally Saturday, not the millions of 2017.
Teviotdale said this does not lessen the urgency of the moment. “This Texas thing — no way can it stand. It’s the thin edge of the wedge,” she said.
Security in the capital was much lighter than for a political rally a few weeks ago in support of Trump supporters jailed in the Jan. 6 insurrection. No fence was placed around the U.S. Capitol, with the Capitol Police chief saying there was nothing to suggest Saturday’s rally would be violent.
John O’Connor in Springfield, Illinois; David Sharp in Bath, Maine; and Daisy Nguyen in San Francisco contributed.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/womens-march-abortion-supreme-court_n_6158c01fe4b0487c855f8b91

Music Video - Dedicated to DIEHARD PASHTUN/AFGHAN DR.NAJIB

Video Report - #AfghanistanEconomicCrisis #Taliban #AfghanistanBusinesses Afghan business owners fear economic collapse over sanctions

Video Report - د آشنا تلویزیون د شنبې خپرونه

ISIS takes credit for killing Sikh in Pakistan

BY CAROLINE VAKIL

 

The Islamic State said in a statement on Friday that it was behind the fatal shooting of a Sikh in Pakistan on Thursday, the Associated Press reported. Several men, whom ISIS identified as its gunmen, fatally shot Satnam Singh, 45, who sold herbal medicine at a clinic in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's provincial capital near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, according to the news outlet. The ISIS statement called Singh a “polytheist,” or a person who believes in more than one deity. Sikhism is a monotheistic religion.
A local community leader, Sardar Harpal Singh, who is not related to the victim, called for the individuals who shot Singh and fled the scene to be arrested.
In the last few years, the Islamic State has claimed responsibility for attacking religious minority groups, religious sites and political protests though officials in the country have claimed that the members of the militant group are officially situated in Pakistan.
In late August, 11 ISIS members were killed by Pakistan’s counterterrorism units after ISIS members had recently murdered two police officers. The group, which has operated in both Pakistan and Afghanistan, has conducted attacks in the provincial capital of Balochistan in past years.
https://thehill.com/policy/international/575015-isis-takes-credit-for-killing-sikh-in-pakistan

Opinion: Let Afghan girls learn

By Ziauddin Yousafzai
@ZiauddinY
January 15, 2009 was one of the saddest days in Malala’s life. That morning she got up but couldn’t get ready to go to school. Two weeks before, the Pakistani Taliban had announced on their FM radio that no girl, old or young, would be allowed to go to school after January 15. Thousands of girls felt devastated after the complete ban on girls' education. Many cried to mourn the death of their future. Malala was one of them. I was shocked but determined to stand and continue to raise my voice for girls' right to education. For me, submitting to the Taliban would have meant a dreadful compromise on Malala’s dreams and ambitions. For me, submitting to the Taliban would have meant a betrayal of the thousands of girls in Swat. The brave people of Swat spoke up for girls' right to education. The rest of the country supported them and, subsequently, the security forces restored the writ of the government. After three months, the schools were reopened.
The fact is that the Taliban in Pakistan believed in the same ideology as the Afghan Taliban did -- repression of women and girls. The Afghan Taliban forced women to remain invisible and stopped girls from going to school. What the Afghan Taliban did to women and girls in Afghanistan from 1996-2001 was replicated by the Taliban in Swat from 2007 to 2009. Initially, they asked for mandatory veils even for small girls, then segregation of male and female students, and finally a complete ban on girls' education.
This is similar to the Afghan Taliban's excuses today regarding girls going to secondary school. The Afghan Taliban's recent takeover of Kabul was an unimaginable disaster for the whole country and shocking for Afghan women and girls. The fall of Kabul to the Afghan Taliban revived my trauma of when Swat fell to the Pakistani Taliban. The first victims whose thought gripped my heart and soul were the 20 million women and girls -- half of Afghanistan's population.
During the Doha peace process, the Afghan Taliban frequently assured the negotiating parties and their mediators / facilitators that they would respect women’s rights and girls' right to education. But once they took over Kabul on August 15, they changed their narrative on issues such as inclusive government, women’s rights and girls' education. With every passing day, their policies and practices prove that they are the same old Taliban of the 1990s. Within days they abolished the Ministry of Women's Affairs, stopped almost all women from working and suspended most girls' education. They are disappointing both their friends and their critics. They are trying hard to seek legitimacy and recognition in the eyes of the world but at home they don’t accept the basic rights of half of their citizens. They believe girl students should be taught only by female teachers but they don’t try to understand the simple fact that the country cannot produce female teachers if they don't allow girls to go to high school or college. In the last 20 years, despite corruption and constant terrorism, Afghan youth had achieved a lot. Nine million Afghan children were enrolled in schools; this included nearly four million girls. Around 200,000 men and more than 100,000 women were studying in universities. Afghanistan produced a world class cricket team, and women's cricket, football teams and girls' robotics teams as well. Afghanistan had transformed. We could see Afghan women in parliament, in the courts, in the media and almost in every other walk of life. A Taliban regime like it was in the past will be like a nightmare for Afghan women, girls and artists. Journalists, human rights activists, politicians, NGO workers, athletes, artists and musicians have all fled or are trying to flee the country. The world is seeing a tragic mass exodus of the most talented, learned and skilful Afghans.
Will the Afghan Taliban ever reflect on this situation of fear? Will they ask themselves why their own don't want to live under their rule? How will they run the country if the brain drain continues and no educated and skilled human resource is produced because of their draconian laws and restrictions on women’s jobs and girls' education? In my view, depriving a girl of her right to go to school is tantamount to burying her alive. The Afghan Taliban should understand that there are 1.8 billion Muslims and 45 Muslim countries in the world. Most Muslim countries respect women’s rights and girls' education. They should learn from them.
They should also know that this is not the Afghanistan they left in 2001 when they ruled by terror and fear. At the time, one armed Talib could bully and coerce a whole village. But now even with more military powers they can see this unprecedented and fearless resistance of Afghan women and men. Marching in the streets of Kabul, Kandahar and Herat these brave women and men have chanted powerful slogans for their rights that surprised the world: "Women’s rights are human rights"; “equality is our right”.
The Taliban have to listen to them. Silencing them with beating and flogging is not the solution. They have to include women in positions of power and allow all girls to achieve the best of education. This is not just because the UN or the international community demand them to do so. It is because this is the only route to bring lasting peace, prosperity and happiness to the people of Afghanistan. Malala once said, “We cannot all succeed when half of us are held back.” In the context of Afghanistan, that simply means Afghanistan can’t move forward when half of its population is held back.
Afghanistan under the Taliban is at the most crucial period of its history. The Afghan Taliban can either choose to stick to their obsolete ideology and keep Afghanistan isolated and once again as an outcast in the international community -- or they can form an inclusive government with women and all ethnicities participating. Their inclusivity at home will pave the way for Afghanistan to become an honourable member of the global community. They can either lose the social, political and economic gains of the last 20 years or benefit from these gains to build a better, stronger and happier Afghanistan.
The Afghan Taliban have repeatedly claimed that they have achieved freedom from foreign occupation. If that is true, then why does freedom mean subjugation for women and girls? They should listen to Fatima, an Afghan student who recently spoke to Tolo News and said: "As a girl, I feel like I am not a citizen of this country. I am imprisoned at home, literally, I am like a prisoner.” Will they listen to 11-year-old Setaresh who wants to become a doctor and told BBC international correspondent Lyse Doucet, "My message to the Taliban is they should allow us to study, to serve our country.”
And finally to world leaders and the international community: you are the last hope. Your faulty decisions failed the democracy of Afghanistan. Don’t fail the people of Afghanistan. Can you imagine living in a country where women are not allowed to work and girls are not allowed an education? Can you think of a country where music is completely prohibited?
If you can’t imagine it for yourselves, then do not recognise the regime of the Afghan Taliban until they accept all girls' right to education, all women’s right to go to work and all musicians' right to beat their drums and strum their guitars.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/896847-let-afghan-girls-learn

Friday, October 1, 2021

Video - #DailyShow #TrevorNoah #BritneySpears Judge Frees Britney from Her Father & Vaccine Mandates Are Doing Their Jobs | The Daily Show

Video Report - 10/01/21: Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jen Psaki

Video Report - UK supply crisis: Is Boris Johnson losing control?

Video Report - Merck: Pill to treat Covid-19 cuts risk of death by half

Video Report - Dr. Gupta asks nurse if anything would convince her to get vaccine. Hear her reply

#Pakistan #PPP questions why parliament not taken into confidence over talks with TTP

PPP leaders on Friday criticised Prime Minister Imran Khan's statement during an interview in which he said the government was holding talks with some factions of the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), terming the move akin to "sprinkling salt on the wounds of martyrs' families" and questioning why parliament was not taken into confidence over such a "sensitive issue".
The party called for the government to clarify in parliament the terms under which the talks were being held.

Earlier today, PM Imran said the government would "forgive [TTP members] and they [would] become normal citizens" if they lay down arms.
"We might not reach some sort of conclusion or settlement in the end but we are talking," he added.
Reacting to the prime minister's interview, PPP Vice President Sherry Rehman questioned whether PM Imran had "asked parliament what we think about that". She also questioned whether the premier had heard the TTP's response to the government's offer of reconciliation.
Meanwhile, PPP secretary general Nayyar Bokhari termed the prime minister's disclosure that talks were being held a "very sensitive statement" and demanded that a session of parliament be called immediately to discuss it.
"The statement of forgiving TTP [members] is akin to sprinkling salt on the wounds of martyrs' relatives," he said.
Bokhari pointed out that the parliament had been "bypassed" and called on the government to clarify the terms on which the talks were being held.
"Why were parliament and political parties kept uninformed about negotiations with the TTP?" he questioned, adding that a "negative perception" would be built about Pakistan on the international level because of such steps.
In a separate statement, PPP information secretary Shazia Marri said the party "strongly condemned" such a big step by the government without first taking parliament into confidence.
She too termed the prime minister's statement "very sensitive" and said it had raised a number of questions.
"On what basis and under what conditions are talks being held with the TTP? Why was the parliament not taken into confidence? Why did the government feel the need to hold secret talks with the TTP in this way?" she asked. Last month, PPP Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari had expressed serious concerns about the "potential blowbacks of the developments in Afghanistan as well as the links between Tehreek-i-Taliban Afghanistan and Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan".
https://www.dawn.com/news/1649531/ppp-questions-why-parliament-not-taken-into-confidence-over-talks-with-ttp

ISIS-K claims killing of Sikh physician in Pakistan’s Peshawar city

Sardar Satnam Singh, a well-known figure in the Sikh community, was running his clinic ‘Dharmandar Pharmacy' on Charsadda Road in Peshawar. He had been living in the city for the past 20 years.
The Islamic State’s Afghanistan affiliate, dubbed Islamic State Khorasan or ISIS-K, has claimed responsibility for the killing of a well-known Sikh ‘hakeem’ in Pakistan’s restive northwestern city of Peshawar’Hakeem’ Sardar Satnam Singh (Khalsa), 45, was at his clinic on Thursday when unidentified gunmen barged into his cabin and opened fire at him, police said. The killers managed to escape from the crime scene.
Singh, who practised Unani medicine, received four bullets, died instantly, police said.
In a message posted on social media late on Thursday, the ISIS-K claimed the killing of Singh.
The ISIS-K, which has stepped up attacks in several Afghan cities since the Taliban seized power in Kabul on August 15, had also claimed the deadly suicide attack at Kabul airport on August 26 that killed nearly 170 Afghans and 13 US military personnel.
According to Punjab Police, Singh had arrived in Peshawar from Hassan Abdaal a day earlier.
Singh, a well-known figure in the Sikh community, was running his clinic ‘Dharmandar Pharmacy’ on Charsadda Road in Peshawar. He had been living in the city for the past 20 years.
Singh is survived by his wife, three daughters and two sons.
About 15,000 Sikhs live in Peshawar, mostly in the Jogan Shah neighborhood of the provincial capital. Most of the Sikh community members in Peshawar are involved in business, while some also run pharmacies.In 2018, Charanjit Singh, a prominent Sikh community member, was killed by unknown men in Peshawar. Similarly, news channel anchor Ravinder Singh was killed in 2020 in the city. In 2016, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf’s National Assembly member Soren Singh was killed in Peshawar.According to the 2017 census, Hindus constitute the largest religious minority in Pakistan. Christians make up the second largest religious minority. The Ahmadis, Sikhs and Parsis are also among the notable religious minorities in Pakistan.
https://indianexpress.com/article/pakistan/sardar-satnam-singh-killing-peshawar-isis-7546768/

"Been Very Honest About Concerns With Pak" Over Terrorist Safe Havens: US

As Afghanistan's neighbor, Pakistan certainly has equities and responsibilities with respect to terrorism in that part of the world, Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby said.
The US has been very honest about its concerns with Pakistan for a long time about the terrorist safe havens along with the border areas of Afghanistan, the Pentagon has said. Afghanistan and the US have criticised Pakistan in the past for allowing Taliban fighters to cross into Pakistan where they are provided safe havens and also receive medical treatment. "We've been very honest about our concerns with Pakistan for a long time, about the safe havens that exist on their side of the border along that spine. And those concerns are still valid today," Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby said on Thursday at a news conference. As Afghanistan's neighbour, Pakistan certainly has equities and responsibilities with respect to terrorism in that part of the world, Mr Kirby said.
"We continue to have candid conversations with Pakistani leaders about our concerns," he said in response to a question.
"I think it's important to continue to remind that the Pakistani people, likewise, have been rendered victim by terrorist threats that emanate from those groups and along that same border," he said.
While Kabul claims that Islamabad is sending thousands of militants to fight in the war-ravaged country and providing safe haven for the Taliban, Pakistan alleges that Afghanistan harbours the anti-Pakistani group Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan -- the Pakistani Taliban -- and also the secessionist Balochistan Liberation Army.
Mr Kirby also said that the United States is within its rights to continue drone strikes inside Afghanistan.
"We believe we have the authorities that we need to continue to protect the nation," he said.
The Taliban has accused the US of violating the withdrawal agreement by continuing to fly drones over Afghanistan and warned Americans against doing that in the future.
"We have the authorities that we need to continue to defend our interests and the security of the American people there and around the world, and we're going to do that," John Kirby said.
"Over-the-horizon operations don't always have to include unmanned aerial assets, and they don't. That we use unmanned aerial assets clearly is true, and the Secretary (of Defence) cited one that was just a week or two ago in Syria. But over-the-horizon doesn't have to mean unmanned. It doesn't even always have to mean aviation," he said.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/us-very-honest-about-its-concerns-on-safe-havens-with-pakistan-says-pentagon-2559774

September inflation edges up to 9% in Pakistan

 

  • On a monthly basis, inflation records an increase of 2.1% owing to significant changes in food, housing, construction indices.
  • Core inflation surges to 6.4% in urban areas in September, reports the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics.
  • The average inflation rate for July-September of the current fiscal year stands at 8.58%, according to the PBS.


The month of September saw a new round of increased prices of consumer items as inflation edged up to 9% from 8.4% in August, data released by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) showed on Friday.

On a month-on-month basis, inflation increased by 2.1% owing to significant changes in three indices — food, housing, and construction.

Speaking to Geo.tv, an analyst from Arif Habib Limited, Sana Tawfiq, said that the inflation rate was way above the market expectation.

“A significant increase of 2.1% on a month-on-month basis came on the back of three sectors — food, transport, and housing," she said.

Tawfiq elaborated that the increase in the prices of perishable items in the food group, rising oil prices internationally and locally, and the surge in electricity prices in Pakistan have impacted the three sectors. Resultantly, this impact was significantly observed in the inflation rate.

The national data collection agency has reported the latest inflation figures after the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting, which announced a 25bps hike in the policy rate for the next two months.

The Wholesale Price Index (WPI), which captures prices in the wholesale market, also rose sharply by 19.6% in September compared to 4.3% in the same month a year ago.

The government has set the average inflation target for the ongoing fiscal year at 8.5%, indicating that the year-on-year inflation may remain in double digits in the fiscal year 2021-22.

Tawfiq said that keeping in view the economic indicators, it is expected that inflation will remain on the higher side by the end of this year.

https://www.geo.tv/latest/373445-september-inflation-edges-up-to-9-in-pakistan


چیئرمین پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے کٹھ پتلی وزیراعظم عمران خان کی جانب سے پیٹرولیم مصنوعات کی قیمتوں میں اضافے کو مسترد کردیا


 پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کے چیئرمین بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے کٹھ پتلی وزیراعظم عمران خان کی جانب سے پیٹرولیم مصنوعات کی قیمتوں میں اضافے کو مسترد کردیا ہے۔ میڈیا سیل بلاول ہاوَس کی جانب سے جاری کردہ بیان کے مطابق پی پی پی چیئرمین نے کہا کہ عوام پہلے ہی تاریخی مہنگائی کی آگ میں جل رہے ہیں، اور اب پیٹرولیم مصنوعات کی قیمتوں میں مزید اضافہ کرنا، مہنگائی کے شعلوں کو ہوا دینے کے مترادف ہے۔ 

انہوں نے کہا کہ معیشت برباد کرنے کے بعد پی ٹی آئی حکومت کے لیئے پیٹرولیم مصنوعات پر ٹیکس و محصولات آمدنی کا اہم ذریعہ ہیں۔ چیئرمین بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے کہا کہ عمران خان کی حکومت میں عوام ریلیف اور کسی اچھی خبر سننے کے لیئے ترس گئے، کیونکہ موجودہ حکومت کی جانب سے ملک میں لوٹ مار سیل جاری ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ خان صاحب نے اپنا تین سالہ دورِ اقتدار صرف عوام کا تیل نکالنے پر ضائع کردیا، اور فائدہ صرف اے ٹی ایمز کو عطا کیا ہے۔

 انہوں نے مزید کہا کہ سلیکٹڈ وزیراعظم عمران خان کو وسیع تر قومی مفاد میں ایک اور یوٹرن لینا چاہیئے، اور اپنی پالیسیوں کو 180 ڈگری پر موڑ دینا چاہیئے۔ چیئرمین بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے مطالبہ کیا کہ پیٹرولیم مصنوعات کی قیمتوں میں ہوشربا اضافہ اور ان پر عائد اضافی ٹیکس و محصولات بلاتاخیر واپس لیئے جائیں۔

https://www.ppp.org.pk/pr/25542/