Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Malala Yousafzai - Healing from one Taliban bullet

Publicado hace un día

Two weeks ago, while U.S. troops withdrew from Afghanistan and the Taliban gained control, I lay in a hospital bed in Boston, undergoing my sixth surgery, as doctors continued to repair the Taliban’s damage to my body.

In October 2012, a member of the Pakistani Taliban boarded my school bus and shot one bullet into my left temple. The bullet grazed my left eye, skull and brain – lacerating my facial nerve, shattering my eardrum and breaking my jaw joints.

The emergency surgeons in Peshawar, Pakistan removed my left temporal skull bone to create space for my brain to swell in response to the injury. Their quick action saved my life, but soon my organs began to fail and I was airlifted to the capital city, Islamabad. A week later, doctors determined that I needed more intense care and should be moved out of my home country to continue treatment.

During this time, I was in an induced coma. I don’t remember anything from the day of the shooting until the moment I woke up at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham, U.K. When I opened my eyes, I was relieved to realise I was alive. But I didn’t know where I was or why I was surrounded by strangers speaking English.

I had the most severe head pain. My vision was blurry. The tube in my neck made it impossible to talk. Days later I still couldn’t speak, but I started to write things in a notebook and show them to everyone who came to my room. I had questions: What happened to me? Where is my father? Who is going to pay for this treatment? We don’t have money.

I wrote “mirror” and showed it to the nurses. I wanted to see myself. I recognised only half of my face. The other half was unfamiliar — black eye, sprinkles of gun powder, no smile, no frown, no movement at all. Half of my hair had been shaved off. I thought the Taliban had done this to me too, but the nurse said the doctors shaved it for surgery.

I tried to stay calm. I told myself, “When they discharge me, I will find a job, earn some money, buy a phone, call my family and work until I pay all the bills I owe to the hospital.”

I believed in my strength. I believed I would get out of the hospital and run like a wolf, fly like an eagle. But I soon realised I couldn’t move most of my body. The doctors hoped it was temporary.

Malala at the hospital in 2012

I touched my abdomen; it felt hard and stiff. I asked the nurse if there was a problem with my stomach. She informed me that when the Pakistani surgeons removed part of my skull bone, they relocated it in my stomach and that, one day, I would have another surgery to put it back in my head.

But the U.K. doctors eventually decided to fit a titanium plate where my skull bone had been, reducing the risk of infection, in a procedure called a cranioplasty. They took the piece of my skull out of my stomach. Today it sits on my bookshelf.

Malala's skull bone on her bookshelf

During the titanium cranioplasty, they also added a cochlear implant where the bullet had destroyed my eardrum.

***

When my family joined me in the U.K., I started physical therapy and rehabilitation. I walked slowly, taking baby steps. I talked like a baby too. It felt like starting over, a second life.

About six weeks after I first landed in U.K., the doctors decided to tackle my facial paralysis. To do this, they cut into my face again and tried to stitch my severed facial nerve back together, hoping it would eventually regrow and facilitate movement.

Malala in December 2012

A few months after the nerve surgery and with regular facial massage, my symmetry and movement had improved a little. If I smiled with my lips closed, I could almost see my old face. I covered my mouth with my hands when I laughed – so people wouldn’t see that one side didn’t work as well as the other.

I avoided staring in the mirror or watching myself on video. In my own mind, I thought I looked fine. I accepted the reality and was happy with myself.

My parents, on the other hand, wanted a cure for everything their daughter had lost. So we met with surgeons at Mass Eye and Ear in Boston to talk about a cross facial nerve graft, a complicated treatment for facial paralysis.

Malala after surgery in 2018

I would need two extensive surgeries. In 2018, the doctors first removed a nerve from my calf and inserted it into my face, running from the right side to the left. In 2019, they took tissue from my thigh and implanted it into the left side of my face. They hoped that the nerve would attach to the tissue and begin sending signals to muscles in my face.

And it worked – I finally had more movement in my face. But the second procedure also caused extra fat and lymphatic fluid to build up around my cheek and jaw. The doctors said I needed yet another surgery.

***

Malala after surgery earlier this month

On August 9 in Boston, I woke up at 5:00 am to go to the hospital for my latest surgery and saw the news that the Taliban had taken Kunduz, the first major city to fall in Afghanistan. Over the next few days, with ice packs and a bandage wrapped around my head, I watched as province after province fell to men with guns, loaded with bullets like the one that shot me.

As soon as I could sit up again, I was making phone calls, writing letters to heads of state around the world and speaking with women’s rights activists still in Afghanistan. In the last two weeks, we’ve been able to help several of them and their families get to a safe place. But I know we can’t save everyone.

When the Taliban shot me, journalists in Pakistan and a few international media outlets already knew my name. They knew that I had been speaking against the extremists’ ban on girls’ education for years. They reported on the attack and people around the world responded. But it could have been different. My story might have ended in a local news item: “15 year-old shot in the head.”

Without the crowds of people holding “I am Malala” signs, without thousands of letters and offers of support, prayers and news stories, I might not have received medical care. My parents certainly wouldn’t have been able to cover the costs on their own. I might not have survived.

Nine years later, I am still recovering from just one bullet. The people of Afghanistan have taken millions of bullets over the last four decades. My heart breaks for those whose names we will forget or never even know, whose cries for help will go unanswered.

***

The wounds from my recent surgery are fresh. On my back, I still carry the scar where doctors removed the bullet from my body.

A few days ago, I called my best friend, the girl sitting next to me on the school bus when I was attacked. I asked her to tell me again what happened that day.

“Did I scream? Did I try to run away?” I ask.

“No,” she says. “You stood still and silent, staring into the face of the Talib as he called out your name. You held my hand so tightly that I felt the pain for days. He recognised you and started firing. You covered your face with your hands and tried to bend down. A second later, you fell into my lap.” Two of my classmates, Shazia and Kainat, were shot in the hand and the arm. The white school bus went red with blood.

My body has scars from one bullet and many surgeries, but I have no memory of that day. Nine years later, my best friend still has nightmares.

https://podium.bulletin.com/269177711419542/ 

“I saw for myself how the Sindh Sanitation workers were laboring hard to clear the backlog of garbage” says Chairman PPP after a tour around Karachi

Pakistan Peoples Party Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari toured Karachi to see the Sindh Government’s development work in the city. He visited areas such as Hassan Square, Gharibabad, Liaquatabad, Sindhi Hotel, Choona Depot, Golimar, Gulbahar, Lasbela, Patel Para, Dhoraji, PECHS, and Bahadurabad . During his visit to these different areas, Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari participated in the tree planting drive at Kidney Hill Park in Dhoraji, inspected the drainage project at PECHS, and visited Ghulam Rasool Terrace Garden. Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari met with shopkeepers at Empress Market and also took selfies with them. On the occasion, the shopkeepers gifted dried fruits to the Chairman PPP and then narrated a few of their problems to him. Taking note of their problems, Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari issued instructions for their immediate resolution, and proceeded towards Seaview for the Urban Forest Project. During a media talk on the occasion, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the people of Karachi have now recognized the true face of PTI and MQM, and the people of the city of Quaid are now ready to give PPP a chance.

In a media talk, Chairman PPP said that he and the PPP will strive and work to make Karachi a world-class city, and do so despite having limited resources and a lack of funding and investment in the city from the federal government.
“I visited District Central, which has been under the control of the MQM for a long time,” stated Chairman PPP. “Now there will be none of the historical impediments to the working of the Water and Sewerage Board, and development will be for the people. I saw for myself Sindh Sanitation workers laboring hard to clear the backlog of garbage.”
He further said that work is in full swing to provide a comfortable environment for the people, whether it is recreational projects like Kidney Hill Park, Urban forests, People’s Squares, or other development projects underway.“The federal government has snatched jobs from 16,000 families, “ said Chairman PPP. “This is not the first time that injustice has been done to these affected families, as they were made unemployed during the 1997 government of Nawaz Sharif. He further said that their jobs were then restored by the parliament. “I appeal to the Sindh government to provide legal assistance to the affected people by giving them legal aid.The court can also be approached,” he said.
Chairman PPP said that unfortunately, there is a constant stream of people losing their jobs. Earlier, 10,000 families of steel mills and FIA officers were also laid off, laying bare the blatant lies of the one crore jobs that were promised by this government. Since this government has formed though, people have only lost their jobs, he added .
Replying to a question about the PDM meeting in Karachi, the PPP Chairman said, “We welcome the PDM to hold a rally in Karachi, but what is the reason for holding the meeting after such a long hiatus?” He said that the PPP has already shown the PDM a political way to overthrow an undemocratic government in a democratic manner. Replying to another question, Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that there is no denying that there are problems in Karachi, but people also can’t deny that the PPP government in Sindh and Chief Minister Murad Shah and his team are working with great sincerity. He said that the PPP has always believed in power at the grassroots level, and we are proud that the local bodies in Sindh have completed their term. This is proof of PPP’s democratic credentials.
“We also allowed our opponents in Karachi to complete the term,” said Chairman PPP. “PTI has not allowed local bodies to function in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, while in Punjab, contempt of court is being done by not restoring local bodies.” He further said that the issue of census and legislation regarding local bodies would be completed and then we would be ready for elections. Replying to a question about the politics of Prime Minister Imran Khan and MQM in Karachi, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that their politics was such that they don’t want to work themselves and don’t allow others to work either.
“Their intentions are not clean,” stated Chairman PPP. “They are not serious about the people of this city, whereas PPP has been seriously working for the people. Khan’s coalition government has not laid a single brick in the city, nor increased a drop of water, or added one megawatt of electricity in the last three years. The federal government has not even fulfilled its promise of a package of Rs 1100 billion,” he said. Replying to a question on the supply of water to Sindh by Irsa, the PPP chairman said that the manner in which Irsa was plundering Sindh’s water was in front of everyone. This is a matter of humanity and human rights. Water scarcity not only harms agricultural crops, it also has a bad effect on the economy of the whole country.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that policing should be done on the border of Afghanistan so that no one could enter the country easily as they have done in the past. Replying to a question about former Sindh Chief Minister Syed Qaim Ali Shah, he said that during the tenure of the former Chief Minister, historic work was done in the province, which is in front of everyone. This includes Thar Coal and SRSO. Qaim Ali Shah started these projects and now they are being carried forward by Murad Ali Shah. Talking about the issue of the electronic voting machine, Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the reigning government will face defeat in the next elections.
He further said that when you cannot run RTS, how will you manage electronic voting machines? A country which suffers from energy shortages and isn’t completed electrified can’t be serious of trying to implement electronic voting machines. Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah, PPP Sindh General Secretary, Local Government Minister, Administrator Karachi and others were also present on the occasion.
https://www.ppp.org.pk/pr/25371/

Tuesday, August 24, 2021

Music Video - Phil Collins - Another Day In Paradise

Video - #paralympics - How accessible are the Paralympics?

Video - Pentagon says no change in plan to complete Afghan evacuation by Aug. 31

Video - Vice President Harris Delivers Remarks Where She Lays Out Her Vision for the Indo-Pacific Region

Video Report - #biden #evacuations #afghanistan Biden discusses evacuation effort in Afghanistan

Noor Jahan - (Ghazal) - Hamari Sanson Mein Aaj Tak Woh

اشنا تلويزیون د سه شنبې خپرونه د ۲۰۲۱ د اګست ۲۴ - وږي ۲

Census shows Ahmadi Muslim population on the decline in Pakistan

According to 2017 Census numbers released by Pakistan, the total population of Ahmadis declined by 35% in 19 years.
The Census numbers show that, from 1998 to 2017, Pakistan lost about 104,000 Ahmadis. During the 1998 census, Ahmadis made up 0.22% of the total population, with 291,175 residents. Meanwhile, in the recent 2017 census, that number dropped to 186,916, making them just 0.09% of the total population of 207.68 million.
The sharp deterioration in the Ahmadi population signals mass migration out of Pakistan, and those who remain preferring to hide their religious identity in government records.
https://www.rabwah.net/census-ahmadi-population-decline-pakistan/

How the Taliban's Afghanistan takeover could hurt US-Pakistan ties

NATO has said Pakistan has a "special responsibility" to make sure Afghanistan lives up to its international commitments. But some Pakistanis say they refuse to be the "scapegoats" of the West's failure in Afghanistan.
The fall of Kabul to the Taliban has left many people in Pakistan questioning their country's future relations with the US.
Some hard-liners in Pakistan say Washington will blame Islamabad for the Islamic fundamentalist group's takeover of Afghanistan.
Pakistan's Human Rights Minister Shireen Mazari wrote an article on Tuesday asserting that "her country would no longer accept being scapegoated for the failures of others."
Bill Emmott, former editor-in-chief of The Economist, wrote last week in a commentary for Project Syndicate that "the blame" for failure in Afghanistan and the return of the Taliban "lies largely with Pakistan and America's inability to bring the country onside." Pakistan is said to be the largest backer of the cloistered group of the Taliban whose regime was recognized by Islamabad when they governed Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001.
Husain Haqqani, the South and Central Asia director at the Hudson Institute — a Washington-based think tank — says Pakistan's past role in Afghanistan has always created friction between Washington and Islamabad.
"Most Americans believe Pakistan's consistent support enabled the Taliban to succeed," Haqqani told DW.
"There is resentment against Pakistan's role in Afghanistan which may not help improve US-Pakistan ties in the near future," he added.
Waning interest for Pakistan
Pakistan in the past relied heavily on the US military and financial assistance, with some estimates suggesting that the country may have received over $30 billion (€25.5 billion) from Washington since 2001.
Islamabad also received generous aid packages and financial assistance during the Cold War when it was a close ally of the US.
But Haqqani says there is very little support in Washington "for resuming large-scale economic or military assistance for Pakistan right now."
Author Ayesha Siddiqa believes Washington has "lost interest" in Islamabad. Pakistan has always sought funds and military assistance from the US, but such support would no longer be on the cards, Siddiqa told DW. "The ties are already strained and there is a sanction-like situation with Pakistan being in the grey list of FATF (Financial Action Task Force)," she added.
The China factor
Defense analyst General Amjad Shoaib says Pakistan's close ties with China have also strained Washington-Islamabad relations.
Pakistan has sought a strategic partnership with China, throwing support behind the Belt and Road Initiative, Shoaib told DW, adding that the move particularly did not go down well with Washington.
The US still has many supporters in Afghanistan, he says, predicting that the war-torn country would be used against Pakistan by "pampering" Baloch insurgents who would target Chinese interests in Pakistan. According to Haqqani, the US and Pakistan have very different foreign policy strategies, and so will have to find a new basis. "Pakistan has made the strategic choice of aligning with China while the US seems to have chosen India as its strategic partner in the region. With tactical cooperation relating to Afghanistan diminishing, the relationship will have to find a new basis," he told DW.
Pakistan's 'special responsibility'
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg on Friday told reporters that Pakistan "has a special responsibility to make sure that Afghanistan lives up to its international commitments" and does "not once again become a safe haven for international terrorists."
"A stable Afghanistan is in the interest of all countries and not least the neighbors as Pakistan," he said at the press conference.
According to Haqqani, "Any evidence of international Jihadi groups becoming active again will also result in sanctions against Afghanistan which has implications for Islamabad as well." But for Amjad Shoaib, the US could use the "pretext" of human rights and the presence of international terror groups to blackmail Pakistan. The defense analyst questioned why such groups were not eliminated during NATO's 20-year-long occupation.
Disruptions to Pakistan's economy
Economist Azra Talat Saeed warns that deteriorating Washington-Islamabad relations would have a catastrophic impact for Pakistan. Saeed also believes the US will use its leverage against Pakistan. "The US and its allies will make it more and more difficult for us (Pakistan) to access funds," she told DW, adding that the country is at risk of economic chaos like Iran and Venezuela.
Saeed believes that Washington will pressure Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies to "create problems for Pakistani workers" and cause crucial remittances to plummet.
"This would be very devastating for our economy," she said.
The coronavirus pandemic has already dealt a severe blow to Pakistan's economy, prompting the closure of over 55,000 small businesses, rendering more than 20 million people jobless. The country already faces over $100 billion dollars in external debt.
Salman Shah, a former federal minister for finance, says that if Pakistan is "pushed to the corner," then Islamabad has Russia, China and other regional countries "to fall back upon."
"We wish to have good ties with the US and want it to be involved economically in the region," he told DW.
https://www.dw.com/en/how-the-talibans-afghanistan-takeover-could-hurt-us-pakistan-ties/a-58971659

Opinion: The time for equivocating about a nuclear-armed, Taliban-friendly Pakistan is over

Opinion: by John R. Bolton
Many profound ramifications of America’s exodus from Afghanistan are competing for attention. Among the top challenges, Pakistan’s future stands out. For decades, Islamabad has recklessly pursued nuclear weapons and aided Islamist terrorism — threats that U.S. policymakers have consistently underestimated or mishandled. With Kabul’s fall, the time for neglect or equivocation is over.
The Taliban’s takeover next door immediately poses the sharply higher risk that Pakistani extremists will increase their already sizable influence in Islamabad, threatening at some point to seize full control.
A description once applied to Prussia — where some states possess an army, the Prussian army possesses a state — is equally apt for Pakistan. Islamabad’s “steel skeleton” is the real government on national security issues, the civilian veneer notwithstanding. Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, has long been a hotbed of radicalism, which has spread throughout the military, to higher and higher ranks. Prime Minister Imran Khan, like many prior elected leaders, is essentially just another pretty face.
During the Soviet war in Afghanistan, ISI extensively supported Afghanistan’s mujahideen against the Soviet military, for religious and national security reasons. Washington made the mistake of funneling much of its assistance to “the muj” through Pakistan, thereby relinquishing control over which politicians and fighters actually received the aid. Pakistan also enabled terrorist groups targeting India, its main regional rival, over Kashmir, a continuing flash point emanating from the 1947 partition and independence from Britain.
After Moscow exited Afghanistan in 1989, ISI unsurprisingly pirouetted to support the Taliban and others who subjugated the country in 1996. Pakistani military doctrine holds that a friendly Kabul regime ensures “strategic depth” against India, which Pakistani leaders believed the Taliban provided. When the U.S. coalition overthrew the Taliban in 2001, ISI provided sanctuaries, arms and supplies inside Pakistan, although Islamabad routinely denied it.
Now, again in power, the Taliban can return the sanctuary favor to Pakistani Taliban — the Pakistani counterpart of the Afghan Taliban — and other radicals. Obviously, the world doesn’t need another terrorist regime, but the risk in Pakistan is of an entirely different order of magnitude, even compared with the menace of al-Qaeda or the Islamic State gaining secure bases in Afghanistan.
While Iran still aspires only to nuclear weapons, Pakistan already has dozens, perhaps more than 150, according to public sources. Such weapons in the hands of an extremist Pakistan would dramatically imperil India, raising tensions in the region to unprecedented levels, especially given China’s central role in Islamabad’s nuclear and ballistic-missile programs. Moreover, the prospect that Pakistan could slip individual warheads to terrorist groups to detonate anywhere in the world would make a new 9/11 incomparably more deadly.
These dangers provided compelling reasons to sustain the U.S. and NATO military presence in Afghanistan. We could have continued overwatch not just of potential new terrorist threats in-country but also observed what was happening across the borders in Pakistan and Iran. Sadly, the Trump-Biden withdrawal policy canceled that insurance policy.
From Cold War conflict against the Soviets in Afghanistan to our own efforts since 9/11, Pakistani-U.S. cooperation has been essential. It led Washington to temper vigorous criticism of Islamabad’s nuclear and pro-terrorist polices. Now, after Kabul’s surrender, America is less dependent on Pakistan’s good will and logistical support. Acknowledging the enormous uncertainty, given Pakistan’s nuclear capabilities, the United States must now come down hard on Islamabad if it continues supporting the Taliban and other terrorists. It has been said that Pakistan is the only government consisting simultaneously of arsonists and firefighters. The firefighters need to step up their game. They must convince their fellow countrymen that the government’s recent path has made Pakistan less secure, not more. Absent clear evidence that Pakistan has terminated assistance to the Taliban, the United States should eliminate its own aid to Islamabad; strike Pakistan from the list of “major non-NATO allies”; impose anti-terrorist sanctions; and more. Our tilt toward India should accelerate.
Most important, we must devote maximum attention to Pakistan’s nuclear stockpiles and weapons-production facilities. If a future terrorist regime in Islamabad (or even today’s government or like-minded successors) appears ready to transfer nuclear capabilities to terrorists, we should take preventive action. This is highly unpalatable, but the alternative of allowing these weapons’ use is far worse. China must be made very aware of our intentions and seriousness, including that Beijing’s long-standing, vital assistance to Islamabad’s nuclear efforts makes China responsible for any misuse. Is President Biden sufficiently resolute to do the necessary? Probably not. In George Packer’s recent biography of diplomat Richard Holbrooke, he quotes from Holbrooke’s notes taken during an Obama administration Situation Room meeting on Afghanistan. “Among his notes were private interjections,” Packer writes. “Vice President Joe Biden said that every one of Pakistan’s interests was also America’s interest: ‘HUH?’”
Biden’s assertion was wrong when made and would be dangerously wrong today; Holbrooke was correct, and eloquent in his brevity. Let’s hope Biden has changed his mind.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/08/23/john-bolton-taliban-takeover-pakistan-extremists/

Monday, August 23, 2021

Music Video - Josephine Baker clip.wmv

#JosephineBaker #Pantheon #Macron Musical legend Josephine Baker first black woman to enter France's Pantheon

Video - Vice President Harris Holds a Press Conference with Prime Minister Lee

Video - President Biden Delivers Remarks on the COVID-19 Response and the Vaccination Program

Video - President Biden Welcomes the Seattle Storm to the White House to Honor their 2020 WNBA Championship

تودې خبرې: د هېواد له سیاسي چارواکو سره د طالبانو سلامشورې

Video - د آشنا تلویزیون د دوشنبې خپرونه،‌اګست ۲۳ وږي لومړی

Taliban takeover could open new chasm in US-Pakistan ties

By SHAUN TANDON
Pakistani ex-envoy says Islamabad wants credit for bringing Afghan insurgents to negotiating table but is remembered in Washington for its ‘role in allowing the Taliban to survive’.
After the September 11 attacks, the United States gave Pakistan a harsh ultimatum to break with the Taliban. Pakistan offered help but insisted that it would not be abandoned again, as in the 1990s, after Washington lost interest in Afghanistan.
Twenty years later, the Taliban has retaken Afghanistan from a US-backed government — and it looks likely that Pakistan will be abandoned again.
“Pakistan is too important to be permanently ignored by the US, but this time Americans will take longer to determine the depth of their relationship with Pakistan,” said Husain Haqqani, Pakistan’s former ambassador to Washington.
The two-decade US war in Afghanistan has been accompanied by a turbulent relationship between the United States and Pakistan, whose then-military ruler Pervez Musharraf vowed “unstinting support” after September 11.
Hoping to woo a skeptical Pakistani public, then-senator John Kerry in 2009 spearheaded a civilian aid package of $1.5 billion a year.
But US suspicions that Pakistan’s powerful military and intelligence were playing a double-game came into stark relief when Osama bin Laden, the world’s most wanted man, was found and killed by US commandos inside Pakistan in 2011.
The United States finally cut military aid in 2018, under president Donald Trump.
Haqqani, now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, said Pakistan sought credit for bringing the Taliban to the table with the Afghan government as part of the US withdrawal.
But in Washington, “what everyone remembers is what Americans see as Pakistan’s role in allowing the Taliban to survive the blow the Americans inflicted on the Taliban after 9/11,” Haqqani said.
While many Pakistanis feel “scapegoated,” Haqqani said Pakistan’s case was not helped by the “triumphalism” of Pakistanis, including Prime Minister Imran Khan. Khan said that the Taliban have “broken the chains of slavery,” while his climate minister, in a since-deleted tweet, hailed the Taliban’s sweep as a “gift” to historic rival India.
India lens
Pakistan, a Cold War ally of the United States, worked with Washington in the 1980s to back Islamic guerrillas who fought out Soviet troops. Afghanistan stayed mired in war as US interest waned and Pakistan openly backed the Taliban, who imposed a draconian version of Islam under their 1996-2001 regime. Pakistan has long seen Afghanistan through the lens of India, which remembers how the Taliban welcomed virulently anti-Indian militants and has pumped in $3 billion in aid since 2001.
Madiha Afzal, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, said that the Pakistani establishment nonetheless did not likely want a complete Taliban win.
“This sort of total military victory of the Taliban puts Pakistan in a position where it’s probably less able to control the Taliban because the Taliban feels it’s victorious,” she said.Islamabad privately also fears “terrible security implications” as Afghanistan could embolden Pakistan’s Taliban in their own violent campaign, she said.US President Joe Biden withdrew troops from Afghanistan, arguing in part that the grinding conflict was a distraction from the greater challenge of a rising China.Amid talk of a Cold War-style rivalry between the world’s two largest economies, Islamabad has emerged as one of the closest allies of Beijing, which is investing heavily in an “economic corridor” in Pakistan at a time that Washington sees India as a leading partner.Afzal said China will also be reliant on Pakistan’s Taliban ties, as it seeks to take advantage of Afghanistan’s mining riches, such as lithium used in electric vehicles.
Other ties limited
Michael Kugelman, a South Asia expert at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, said the United States could still decide Pakistan is the avenue to influence the Taliban or, if Islamabad agrees, to base counterterrorism operations. If Washington “seeks engagement and wants to get Taliban assurances on issues of rights and governance, then the familiar pressure game will return” on Pakistan, Kugelman said.
Visiting Washington shortly before the Taliban takeover, Pakistan’s national security adviser, Moeed Yusuf, called for a long-term relationship that looks beyond single issues.
But even though Pakistan has the world’s fifth largest population, it was the 56th trading partner of the United States in 2019 at just $6.6 billion.
“The non-security relationship is not strong enough to make up for the lack of a security relationship,” Haqqani said.
Afzal said that if the United States steps back, it “will just confirm Pakistan’s existing notions that the US is only using Pakistan opportunistically when it needs it.”
“If there isn’t an abandonment and disengagement this time around, I think Pakistanis might take a step back and say, okay, something has changed,” she said.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/taliban-takeover-could-open-new-chasm-in-us-pakistan-ties/

Naila Amin, 31, was a child bride in Pakistan - She was forced to wed at 13. Now she’s helped make child marriage illegal in New York

MAYA BROWN
Naila Amin, 31, was a child bride in Pakistan at the age of 13; she now has a law named after her that bans the practice in New York state.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo recently signed a bill into law raising the age of marriage consent to 18 in New York. Called “Naila’s Law,” it went into effect Saturday.

Child marriage is when someone under the age of 18 becomes legally married to an adult. Such minors, more likely girls than boys, are often forced into marriage because of socioeconomic factors by families who want to minimize their economic burden or earn income as a result of the marriage, according to UNICEF. Religious and cultural norms also contribute to its ongoing practice.
The practice is technically still legal in 44 U.S. states, as most allow marriage before 18. Cuomo signed legislation in New York in 2017 that raised the age of consent to marry from 14 to 18, but 17-year-olds could be married with parental and judicial consent.
Amin, an activist, founded the Naila Amin Foundation to help victims of child marriage and has been pushing U.S. states to end it for years. In 2018, she helped New Jersey raise the minimum marriage age to 18, making it the second state to do so.
Shortly after, Amin went to New York state Assemblyman Philip Ramos’ office in Brentwood on Long Island and told him about being a former child bride. “This story just touched my heart and it moved me to come up with legislation to outlaw child marriage,” Ramos said.
Because of the pandemic, Amin saw the proposed bill start to “slip through the cracks.”
“I emailed every Assembly member and every senator in New York state with my story and said please support this bill,” Amin said. “I think it was about 150 Assembly members and it took me days, but I did it. We can’t let this happen to our children anymore." Once she found out the bill had cleared unanimously, she called Cuomo’s office daily to urge him to sign it, leaving her with a feeling of anxiety. She partnered up with Unchained At Last, an organization dedicated to ending forced and child marriage, which promised to begin protesting outside Cuomo’s office weekly if the bill wasn’t turned into a law.
“I am so sick of crying over this because it’s like repeating myself all over again. Why can’t we just end it?" Amin said.
When Cuomo finally signed the bill, making New York the sixth state to ban child marriage, Amin said it felt "almost surreal, a very happy feeling."
“When I found out about it, I was laying on a couch and I just started crying tears of happiness,” she said.
Amin says this is only the beginning, as her goal is to end child marriage in all 50 states. She is currently working on a federal bill to have U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services raise the spousal sponsorship to 18. Her goals stem from personal experience, as she never got to experience childhood.
During a trip to her cousin’s wedding in Pakistan, Amin found out that she was engaged at 8 years old to her first cousin Tariq. Five years later, she found herself at a Nikah ceremony, a traditional Islamic marriage that is done without an official marriage license. She married her 21-year-old cousin against her will. During her marriage, Amin lived in constant fear, finding herself curled up on the floor waiting to be beaten or raped. Her father applied to legalize the marriage and for an American spousal visa so that Tariq could become a U.S. citizen.
About a year later, she returned to the U.S. and once her parents found out she had started a relationship there, they beat her. Amin was taken away by Child Protective Services and put into foster care. She later ran away and returned home.
She was eventually sent back to Pakistan right before she turned 15 to consummate the marriage. Three months later, she was rescued by the U.S. Embassy and brought back to New York, where she was no longer considered Tariq’s wife.
The fact that Amin was still technically a ward of the foster care system in the U.S. saved her life.
The Pew Research Center says asking for judicial consent or presenting parents’ permission are ways to bypass the minimum age to marry in many states.
Unchained At Last recently released a study that found that Citizenship and Immigration Services approved 8,868 petitions involving minors for spousal or fiancé entry into the U.S. from 2007 to 2017. The younger party was a girl in 95 percent of the petitions. “The age of marriage needs to be higher to eliminate child marriage,” Fraidy Reiss, Unchained's founder and executive director, said. “We’re talking about that rare legislation that harms no one except child rapists — it costs nothing. This simple commonsense legislation ends a human rights abuse and we can do this right here today; legislators just need to step up.”
The survivor-led organization provides free legal and social services to help individuals resist or escape.
“Our ultimate goal is to help all the survivors we work with to achieve full financial and emotional independence, and we have been able to help more than 700 people in this way,” Reiss said, who is a victim of a strictly Orthodox forced marriage that took her 15 years to get out of.
As of 2020, there were an estimated 285 million child brides in South Asia. About 59 percent of girls are married before the age of 18 in Bangladesh, 27 percent in India and 18 percent in Pakistan, according to data from Girls Not Brides. The Women’s Refuge Commission says South Asian families force their daughters into child marriage as it is perceived to be the best means to provide economic and physical security.
Even though almost half of all women in South Asia aged 20-24 reported being married before the age of 18, the rates of child marriage are currently decreasing in the region. Amin stressed that child marriage does not happen only to South Asian women, but it also affects women in other countries.
In Latin America and the Caribbean, about 1 in 4 women are married before 18. Most of the top 20 countries with the highest prevalence rates of child marriage are in Africa, with Niger having the highest child marriage rate in the world. In west and central Africa, about 41 percent of girls in the region marry before reaching the age of 18.
It also greatly affects women in the U.S., as approximately 40 children are married each day in America. Nearly 300,000 minors under the age of 18 were legally married in the U.S. from 2000 to 2018, according to a recent study. States with the highest per-capita rates of child marriage include Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Nevada and Oklahoma.
Child marriage in the U.S. is typically driven by poverty or social and cultural norms.
“People need to get that out of their head that this is a Muslim issue because it’s not. It’s American,” Amin said.
Casey Swegman, the Forced Marriage Initiative project manager at the Tahirih Justice Center, said child marriage can have physical, economic, social and mental impacts, including depression and a loss of education.
Amin still endures those effects today as she suffers from an anxiety disorder and has developed psoriasis.
“It’s a trauma response and it’s just been really hard,” Amin said. “But I know that my two-and-a-half years of work was really worth it. This is one of the proudest moments of my life.”
Amin says her past has taught her resiliency and how to survive.
“I’ve been surviving for the past 31 years,” she said. “It made me realize that there is a fire inside of me that can’t be extinguished. It made me realize women can do anything, we can do anything.”
https://www.aol.com/she-forced-wed-13-now-183258041.html

Opinion: The Pakistani media faces a new crackdown

Opinion: by Hamid Mir 
@HamidMirPAK

 A new law could mark the beginning of the end for Pakistan’s hard-won media freedoms.
In 2009, I set out to broadcast a live show direct from the Swat Valley in northern Pakistan — right after the government had signed a peace deal with the Pakistani Taliban, which controlled the area at the time. But only a few hours before the show, one of my reporter friends, Musa Khan Khel, was gunned down by unknown people in Taliban territory. That evening I led a rally to protest his death. One of the people who came was an 11-year-old blogger by the name of Malala Yousafzai.

She was supporting the right to an education for girls, which was denied by the Taliban. I suggested that she come on my live show and speak her mind. Malala agreed. Within hours, she became a media star.
Back then, thanks to the efforts of many defenders of our democratic institutions, it was possible for the Pakistani media to take a strong, public stand even in places dominated by the Taliban.
Consider the contrast with the present. Today, Malala is a global celebrity. Yet recently the local authorities in Punjab province seized seventh-grade textbooks because they contained pictures of her. Today, though, the Pakistani media is no longer in a position to stand behind Malala — even though Punjab province is not ruled by the Taliban. It is ruled by the party of Prime Minister Imran Khan. Unfortunately, his government is showing its contempt for media freedom and working to suppress dissenting voices — just like the Taliban used to do in Swat.
Although Pakistan is a democracy, journalists now fear that a crackdown on the media is in the offing. The government of Imran Khan is moving ahead with a law to create a new media regulator, to be called the “Pakistan Media Development Authority,” to oversee mainstream and social media.
The body will have draconian powers. All the major media organizations have rejected this proposed “reform” with a single voice; some are calling it “media martial law.” The million-dollar question is this: Why does Imran Khan need a new regulatory body for the media, and why is the journalistic community so united against it?
Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry has said the government plans to table the bill in parliament in the next few days, and that it will be imposed within 45 days after passage.
The proposed law is just the latest stage of an effort to impose state control over all segments of the media by creating an overcentralized body to be headed by a top bureaucrat of the information ministry. According to the new law, all media outlets including social media platforms will require an annual waiver from the government to remain operational. Failure to comply will result in suspension and other penalties. For the first time in Pakistan’s history, special media regulatory authority will be introduced to punish “offenders” from the media with three years’ imprisonment and fines amounting to 25 million Pakistani rupees ($152,000 in U.S. dollars).
When I asked Minister Chaudhry why his ministry wanted to establish media tribunals, he said: “We have only proposed fines for violating journalistic ethics.” He claimed: “The media tribunals will decide disputes between the media workers and the owners.”
Yet, journalists can hardly be blamed for suspecting that this law is yet another attempt to legalize censorship. Many analysts think that the new proposed law does not bode well for democracy and that the Pakistani media is entering a new dark age.
Many independent journalists as well as social media commentators are already facing false cases registered by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) under cyber laws. The most recent incident in this regard was the arrest of two vocal journalists from Lahore, Amir Mir and Imran Shafqat. Journalists have good reason to worry that the new law will only create new problems for the already brutalized and terrified media.
The Afghan Taliban has captured Kabul, and their Pakistani allies are also returning to the Swat Valley and other parts of the country. A few days ago Prime Minister Khan praised the Afghan Taliban for, as he put it, “breaking the shackles of slavery.”
And that raises an obvious question: So why is he making new shackles for the media in Pakistan? Pakistan needs a strong and free media to fight growing threat of extremism. “Media martial law” will only help those who can’t tolerate the pictures of Malala in our schoolbooks and who don’t want to see democracy in Pakistan flourish. The talk of an impending dark age for the media looks more justified by the day.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/08/23/pakistani-media-faces-new-crackdown/