Friday, January 22, 2021

Bilawal Bhutto pitches for no-confidence motion to oust Imran Khan-led Pak govt

 By Sajjad Hussain

Pakistan Peoples Party chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Friday said the Opposition parties should bring a no-confidence motion against the Prime Minister Imran Khan-led government, as a majority vote in the House would be the most effective method to topple the government. 

Addressing the public at an event in Sindh province''s Larkana city, the Opposition leader said he would talk to other Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) leaders on the no-confidence motion as it would be better than continuing their protest movement.

The 11-party PDM, formed in September last year, has demanded the present government resign, alleging the 2018 elections were rigged with the help of the Army to install "puppet" Prime Minister Imran Khan.

“The democratic way to send this incompetent, illegal, unqualified prime minister is through a no-confidence motion. Even 10 rallies will not yield the kind of results as a strategic meeting (opposition leaders) over a cup of tea which is sure to cause the government to worry," Bhutto said.

Bhutto said he would ask the Opposition parties to "strike" in the Parliament.

In the last few months, the PDM has held scores of anti-government rallies in major cities.

Though Bhutto had earlier proposed that PDM leaders must resign en-mass from the  Parliament, the plan has not been executed.

Political pundits have also suggested cracks in the PDM leadership. 

https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/bilawal-bhutto-pitches-for-noconfidence-motion-to-oust-imran-khanled-pak-govt/2015762

We will send home the present incompetent and illegitimate government in a democratic, constitutional and legal manner, Chairman PPP

 Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has said that we will send home the present incompetent and illegitimate government in a democratic, constitutional and legal manner, and for attacking it through a no-confidence motion we will convince all the parties in PDM.

Addressing the inauguration ceremony of the Larkana Industrial Estate, the PPP Chairman said that the parties in the PDM would be persuaded that if we have to attack, we have to attack in the assembly in a democratic way. “All the allies in the PDM will be on the same page and even our meetings over a cup of tea are scaring the PTI regime more than rallies,” he stated.

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that nowadays PTI ministers are trying to create cracks in the opposition alliance, which is a reflection of their fears as PTI government is afraid of the joint power of attack of all democratic forces.

He said that the federal government of PTI has left the people especially the people of Sindh destitute. But we are continuing to fight for the rights of the people at all levels. The government ministers also believe that the PPP and the Sindh Chief Minister are the obstacles to Imran Khan’s anti-people policies. “PPP leaders are targeted through media trial and NAB, but we know how to counter conspiracies, and we know how to get undemocratic forces out of politics,” he added.

The PPP Chairman said that the PTI government wants to run the economy and the country through intimidation and pointed out that the Sindh government increased tax revenue but did not use sticks for this.

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that his party has always served the people under its manifesto adding that he wanted to send a message to the business and industrial communities that like in the rest of the country, the role of PPP is being tarnished in front of them. “We are definitely people-friendly, but that does not mean that we are opponents of industrialisation and business.

He said that establishment of Larkana Industrial Zone would not only benefit the local industries and businesses but also create employment opportunities for the people. “We have to work together in this difficult economic situation. PTI government has not provided a single job of the committed 10 million jobs or 5 million houses instead it has deprived tens of thousands of employment and homes”, he added.

https://www.ppp.org.pk/pr/24323/

Thursday, January 21, 2021

Video - Biden inauguration puts US poet Amanda Gorman on bestseller list

Video - #LateShowLIVE #Inauguration2021 #Monologue President Biden's Joyful Inauguration Day Felt Like A Return To Normalcy

Video - #JoeBiden #COVIDResponse #ExecutiveOrder President Biden speaks on COVID-19 response, signs executive orders

Video Report - Dr. Anthony Fauci gives update on Biden administration vaccine efforts

Video - Amanda Gorman, 'Overjoyed': Hear from poet who stole the show at inauguration

Music Video - Hamari sanson main aj tak - Madam Noor jahan

#Pakistan - Racism and marginalisation of minorities in Punjab school textbooks

Prof Anjum James Paul writes to Prime Minister Imran Khan to denounce a new example of intolerance. A dialogue in a middle school textbook is at the centre of a controversy. But “there are hundreds of examples,” Prof James warns. Students must be taught “humanity, ethics and moral values”.
Racism “is a crime against humanity, it is the enemy of pluralism, peaceful coexistence and harmony in society,” writes Anjum James Paul, president of the Pakistani Minority Teachers Association (PMTA) a letter addressed yesterday to Prime Minister Imran Khan, denouncing a new case of discrimination in school textbooks.
“Pakistan’s foreign policy has always condemned racial discrimination, but unfortunately it still exists in our country,” he adds. “The religious identity of minorities matters as much as that of the majority” and for this reason every form of racism and marginalisation must be “fought”.
In this case, a middle school textbook is at the centre of a controversy, but “there are hundreds of examples,” warns the educator and activist from Faisalabad.
The offending words had a wide echo on social media, sparking anger and pain in the Christian community according to which this attitude is now rooted in a part of the population and is instilled in school to new generations of pupils in Punjab.
On page 155 of an Urdu language middle school textbook (pictured) distributed by the provincial government of Punjab, the following dialogue can be read:
                       Nasir: I have brought a dish of sweets for your guests
                       Girl: But who is that black boy?
                       Nasir: He is our neighbour, Joseph, who is my friend
                       Girl: I don't like to eat anything from black people
Nasir: Oh Saima, what are you talking about. We have to see the inner beauty of a person.  
This is just one of many examples from recent years. Activists, experts and human rights groups have long underlined that racism and confessional hatred must be opposed from an early age and that peace and integration must be promoted in school classrooms, starting with the youngest. In this context, a crucial role is played by school textbooks which, in too many cases, are themselves the first to sow divisions and promote intolerance.
Mariyam Kashif Anthony, a teacher and human rights activist from Karachi, stresses the urgent need to “counter” hate speech in textbooks. “As a teacher my priority is to teach my students about humanity, ethics and moral values ​,” she said.Many associations share such concerns, including the Pakistani National Commission for Justice and Peace (NCJP), which has long been involved in this area.
From 2011 to 2020, Christian experts point out, a climate of hatred seem to have increased and episodes of intolerance have multiplied, despite the appeals and demands for greater attention to the material published for students, especially the youngest. 
 http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Racism-and-marginalisation-of-minorities-in-Punjab-school-textbooks-52128.html

EDITORIAL: #Pakistan - Who’ll answer for the gas crisis?

The gas crisis has been handled so badly that news reports suggest that unhappiness with the prime minister’ special assistant on energy, Nadeem Babar, has reached the federal cabinet itself. At the heart of the problem is the government’s own incompetence since for some reason it did not purchase Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) during the summer, when the price was low, and did not wake up to the need for it till market volatility pushed up prices very sharply. Now it has only itself to blame since Dubai-based Emirates National Oil Company (ENOC) went back on its commitment and it must now make a rush for new, definitely more expensive, contracts. So, on top of the millions already lost because of the delay, the country must now pay yet more exorbitant fees for no reason at all.

This is not just a case of a couple of deals gone wrong, rather such things not only amount to a lot of suffering for households who are suddenly struggling with no gas, but also drive up production cost for industry and end up harming revenue collection in no small manner. Already the demand-supply situation has forced the petroleum division to recommend discontinuation of natural gas from February 1 to all industrial units using it primarily for power-generation and self-consumption. Therefore the prime minister must initiate an urgent inquiry into the matter; on which will also investigate if Nadeem Babar’s present duties amount to a conflict of interest considering his personal stakes in the private energy business.

Now the long-term LNG deals signed by the previous government, which PTI criticised to no end at the time and later, are the only thing ensuring what little gas that is still flowing in the country. These developments do not speak very highly of the government since it had been warned in advance of a hard winter yet not only did it not prepare for it, it also made the existing situation much worse. These are very genuine concerns and the government must address them. If a part of the official machinery, or some of its advisors, is responsible for causing harm to the treasury as well as industry, then it must be fixed immediately. Anything less would be unbecoming of a party that came to power on promises of fair play and transparency. 

https://dailytimes.com.pk/714890/wholl-answer-for-the-gas-crisis/

#Pakistan journalists face charges for criticizing military

 Criticizing Pakistan's military has become riskier, and journalists are being singled out for flimsy offenses under a beefed-up "electronic crimes" law. DW speaks with one of the journalists targeted.

It was a normal day in September 2020 for Pakistani journalist Asad Ali Toor, who started his morning with a fresh newspaper and a cup of tea. But when Toor turned to page three, he was shocked to see a so-called First Information Report (FIR) had been registered against him.

Toor was being charged with spreading "negative propaganda" against the Pakistani state and its institutions through social media under the Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act 2016 (PECA).
Since it was passed in 2016, PECA has been heavily criticized by civil society in Pakistan as a draconian tool used to muzzle free speech. The act criminalizes speech considered "blasphemous," along with speech that criticizes state institutions, which are colloquially referred in Pakistan as "the establishment."
Authorities are attempting to extend PECA's reach with a new section inserted into Pakistan's penal code stipulating up to two years in prison and a fine of over €2,500 ($3,018) for anyone that "intentionally ridicules, brings into disrepute or defames the Armed Forces of Pakistan" or its members.

PECA targets social media

Toor has been working in Pakistani digital media since 2005, and says he has witnessed the erosion of journalistic freedom and a simultaneous strengthening of censorship with each successive government.

"Traditional media has had to bow down to governments and censorship. Social media is not as censored, so they are now introducing these laws to scare people into silence," Toor told DW.

A week before the FIR was registered against him, Toor was let go from his longtime job at Samaa TV, a major Pakistani broadcaster. The journalist says he had not backed away from his reporting on the government and military.

Toor said the most frustrating part of the three-month judicial process was that he was never told which of his tweets were deemed illegal, or who had filed the FIR.

"I was not told even during the hearings at the High Court in Lahore. It is very frustrating when you are standing trial for a crime you don't understand you committed," Toor added.

In addition to Toor, two other journalists were charged with "spreading hatred" against the state and its institutions in the same week. Free speech activists say the charges are intended as a warning that the state is willing to enforce PECA.

Civil society comes to journalists' defense

In November 2020, Toor was cleared of charges by the Lahore High Court. He wrote on Twitter that the Lahore High Court judge ruled there was not enough evidence, and he gave credit for the dismissal to the overwhelming support he received from lawyers and free speech activists.

Toor's case was taken up by the non-profit Media Matters for Democracy and the Pakistani Bar Council's "Journalists Defence Committee," which provides free legal assistance and services to journalists.

Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir, a committee member who worked extensively on the case, told DW that the journalists were targeted because the Pakistani state wishes to avoid the accountability and criticism brought on by free and independent media.

Mazari-Hazir said she worries the PECA's amendment into the penal code will weaponize the act against journalists.

"It will impact freedom of expression and journalism by curtailing this right, and intimidating and punishing those who exercise it," she said.

"We are already not able to discuss many issues that relate to the military and intelligence agencies, including enforced disappearances," she added.

Since PECA was passed, many activists and journalists have been subject to arrests and sedition charges.

However, there has also been a countermovement seen in digital activism that safeguards people's right to freedom of expression. This pushback has allowed for journalists like Toor to challenge claims made against them under the PECA.

Targeting social media

The Pakistani digital rights organization Bolo Bhi keeps track of PECA-related arrests, restrictions and takedowns.

Their most reliable estimates show that from 2006 to 2020, there have been 84 incidences of content blocking and takedown requests.

In 2006, the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) blocked more than 1,000 websites over a Supreme Court ruling targeting online "blasphemy."

In the meantime, there have been numerous temporary bans on social media platforms like TikTok, Facebook and YouTube.

It is also estimated that the Pakistani government has allocated an estimated budget of $10 million towards internet filtering tools and blocking systems to control data.

According to Bolo Bhi, there have been a total of 36 "government announcements to crackdown and regulate social media" between 2016 and 2020.

Between 2017 and 2019, the organization has recorded at least 51 incidents during which

legal action was taken against individuals based on their social media posts.

"The Federal Investigation Agency is not transparent and many accusations seem baseless and frivolous. When freedom of speech is criminalized, we cannot have a free, critically thinking society or government," Toor said.

https://www.dw.com/en/pakistan-journalists-military-press-freedom/a-56265949

#Pakistan #PPP - Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari congratulates the newly-elected President of the USA, Mr Joe Biden

Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has congratulated the newly-elected President of the United States of America USA Mr Joe Biden on taking oath as 46th President of the oldest democracy of the world.

In his felicitation message, the PPP Chairman hoped that swearing in of Mr Joe Biden will augur well for the democracies and democratic nations on the map of this planet.

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari further expected that democracies around the world will be strengthened and autocratic, selected and sponsored regimes will find no support to undermine the will and aspirations of the people around the democratic world.

https://www.ppp.org.pk/pr/24321/

Wednesday, January 20, 2021

Video Music - #BruceSpringsteen #LetterToYou Bruce Springsteen - Letter To You

Video - #Biden #WhiteHouse #WhiteHouseBriefing Press Secretary Jen Psaki holds first White House briefing of Biden's presidency | USA TODAY

Video - President Joe Biden to tackle US economic crisis

Video - Biden inauguration: relief for African countries hard hit by Trump administration

Video - #Poetry #Inauguration Amanda Gorman’s Biden Inauguration Poem

Video - #JenniferLopez #BidenInauguration #TodayShow Jennifer Lopez Performs A Patriotic Medley At Biden’s Inauguration

Video - #LadyGaga #BidenInauguration #TodayShow Watch Lady Gaga Perform The National Anthem At Biden’s Inauguration

Video - #Inauguration2021 #BidenHarrisInauguration - President Joe Biden's full inauguration speech

Video - #Inauguration2021 #BidenHarrisInauguration - Joe Biden and Kamala Harris inauguration ceremony

#Inauguration2021 #BidenHarrisInauguration - BIDEN IS SWORN IN AS 46TH PRESIDENT

By Peter Baker
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. and Kamala Devi Harris took the oath of office at a Capitol still reeling from the attack of a violent mob at a time when a deadly pandemic is still ravaging the country.
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. was sworn in as the 46th president of the United States on Wednesday, taking office at a moment of profound economic, health and political crises with a promise to seek unity after a tumultuous four years that tore at the fabric of American society.
With his hand on a five-inch-thick Bible that has been in his family for 128 years, Mr. Biden recited the 35-word oath of office swearing to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution” in a ceremony administered by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., completing the process at 11:49 a.m., 11 minutes before the authority of the presidency formally changes hands.
The ritual transfer of power came shortly after Kamala Devi Harris was sworn in as vice president by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, her hand on a Bible that once belonged to Thurgood Marshall, the civil rights icon and Supreme Court justice. Ms. Harris’s ascension made her the highest-ranking woman in the history of the United States and the first Black American and first person of South Asian descent to hold the nation’s second highest office. In his Inaugural Address, Mr. Biden declared that “democracy has prevailed” after a test of the system by a defeated president, Donald J. Trump, who sought to overturn the results of an election and then encouraged a mob that stormed the Capitol two weeks ago to block the final count. But he called for Americans to put aside their deep and dark divisions to come together to confront the coronavirus pandemic, economic troubles and the scourge of racism.
“We must end this uncivil war — red against blue, rural versus urban, conservative versus liberal,” Mr. Biden said in the 21-minute address that blended soaring themes with folksy touches. “We can do this if we open our souls instead of hardening our hearts, if we show a little tolerance and humility, and if we’re willing to stand in the other person’s shoes, as my mom would say, just for a moment.” Mr. Biden used the word “unity” repeatedly, saying that he knew it “can sound to some like a foolish fantasy” but insisting that Americans had emerged from previous moments of polarization and can do so again.
“We can join forces, stop the shouting and lower the temperature,” he said. “For without unity, there is no peace, only bitterness and fury. No progress, only exhausting outrage. No nation, only a state of chaos. This is our historic moment of crisis and challenge, and unity is the path forward.”
The ceremony on a chilly, breezy but sunny day with a brief smattering of snowflakes brought to a close the stormy and divisive four-year Trump presidency. In characteristic fashion, Mr. Trump once again defied tradition by leaving Washington hours before the swearing in of his successor rather than face the reality of his own election defeat, although Mike Pence, his vice president, did attend.
Mr. Trump flew to Florida, where he plans to live at his Mar-a-Lago estate. But within days, the Senate will open the former president’s impeachment trial on the charge that he incited an insurrection by encouraging the mob that attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 in an attempt to stop the formal counting of the Electoral College votes ratifying his defeat.
The sight of the nation’s newly installed president and vice president on the same West Front of the Capitol occupied just two weeks ago by the marauding pro-Trump crowd underscored how surreal the day was. Unlike most inaugurals suffused with joy and a sense of fresh beginning, the festivities on the nation’s 59th Inauguration Day served to illustrate America’s troubles.
Amid fear of further violence, Washington has been transformed into an armed camp, with some 25,000 National Guard troops joining thousands of police officers and a wide swath of downtown blocked off. With the coronavirus pandemic still raging, Americans were told to stay away, leading to the eerie spectacle of a new president addressing a largely empty National Mall, filled not with people but with flags meant to represent the absent crowd.
Many of the usual inaugural customs were scrapped because of the virus, including a lunch with congressional leaders in Statuary Hall, the boisterous parade down Pennsylvania Avenue and the gala evening balls where the new president and his wife are typically expected to dance.
Instead, Mr. Biden will review military units on the East Front of the Capitol and later proceed to the White House escorted by marching bands from all branches of the military as well as university drum lines from the University of Delaware and Howard University, the alma maters of the new president and vice president, respectively. After that, a virtual “Parade Across America” will feature performances live streamed from 56 states and territories.
To symbolize the theme of national unity that Mr. Biden sought to project, he will be joined by three former presidents — Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton — to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery before the parade. Instead of the formal dances, the new first and second couples will take part in a 90-minute televised evening program hosted by the actor Tom Hanks.
If the pomp and circumstance were constrained by the challenges of the day, Mr. Biden’s determination to get off to a fast start unraveling the Trump presidency was not. He planned to sign 17 executive orders, memorandums and proclamations in the late afternoon aimed at reversing many of the major elements of the last administration, a dramatic repudiation of his predecessor and a more expansive set of Inauguration Day actions than any in modern history.
Among other moves, he planned to issue a national mask mandate for federal workers and federal property, seek the extension of an eviction pause and student loan relief, rejoin the Paris climate accord, suspend construction of Mr. Trump’s border wall, lift the travel ban on certain predominantly Muslim countries, bolster the program allowing young immigrants brought into the country illegally as children to stay, bar discrimination by the federal government based on sexual orientation or gender identity and impose a moratorium on oil and natural gas leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Rarely if ever has a new president moved to reverse so much of his predecessor’s work on his first day in office, but Mr. Biden was intent on signaling a clean break from Mr. Trump. Some of the orders were more symbolic than substantive, and enduring change will still require legislation. To that end, Mr. Biden planned to unveil on Wednesday an immigration overhaul providing a path to citizenship for 11 million people living in the country illegally that will have to be approved by Congress in what is sure to be a contentious debate.
Commanding attention in Congress will be a challenge, with Mr. Trump’s trial likely consuming the Senate for days or weeks. As it stands, the Senate appeared unlikely to confirm any of Mr. Biden’s cabinet choices on Inauguration Day, another breach of custom. Mr. Trump had two of his cabinet secretaries confirmed on the day he took office, while Mr. Obama and Mr. Bush each had seven.
With Ms. Harris’s inauguration, the Senate, evenly divided with 50 Democrats and 50 Republicans, now flips to the Democrats thanks to her tiebreaking vote as the chamber’s president. Senator Chuck Schumer of New York becomes the Democratic majority leader and hopes to create two parallel tracks so it can consider both nominations and legislation even as it conducts the Trump trial. Mr. Biden hoped to use his Inaugural Address to strike a sharply different tone from his predecessor, who favored provocation over conciliation. Mr. Biden began working on it before Thanksgiving in a process run by his longtime adviser, Mike Donilon. He received help from Jon Meacham, the historian who is serving as an outside informal adviser, as well as from Vinay Reddy, his speechwriter, while relying on his sister, Valerie Biden Owens, who has long been an important sounding board.
But even as the new president called for unity, he wanted to use the speech to call out racism in the wake of the George Floyd killing and the siege of the Capitol by extremists. And while he did not want to cite Mr. Trump by name, he talked about the need for truth and the consequences of lies after four years in which the president made tens of thousands of false or misleading statements.
Beyond age, gender and race, Mr. Biden could hardly be more of a contrast to the president he succeeded. A longtime senator, former vice president and consummate Washington insider, Mr. Biden prides himself on his experience working across the aisle and hopes to forge a partnership with Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, and other Republicans. Garrulous and loquacious, known for an incandescent smile, a sometimes overly familiar shoulder rub and a proclivity for gaffes, Mr. Biden practices the sort of feel-your-pain politics of empathy mastered by Mr. Clinton and the call-me-anytime politics of relationships exemplified by the first President George Bush.
At 78, Mr. Biden is the oldest president in American history — older on his first day in office than Ronald Reagan was on his last — and even allies quietly acknowledge that he is no longer at his prime, meaning he will be constantly watched by friends and foes alike for signs of decline. But he overcame the doubts and the obstacles to claim the prize of his lifetime nearly 34 years after kicking off the first of his three presidential campaigns.
While he has strong center-left beliefs at his core, he is not ideologically driven, willing and even eager to move with the political center of gravity. The progressive wing of his party remains skeptical and he may find it daunting to hold together his electoral coalition, whose main point of agreement was shared antipathy for Mr. Trump.
Mr. Biden arrives at the pinnacle of power with a tailwind of public support. Fifty-seven percent of Americans view him favorably, according to Gallup, a higher rating than Mr. Trump ever saw in office, and 68 percent approve of Mr. Biden’s handling of the transition. But the vast majority of the public believes the country is on the wrong track and, in a measure of the impact of Mr. Trump’s drumbeat of false allegations of election fraud, 32 percent told CNN pollsters that they did not believe Mr. Biden won the election legitimately. Mr. Biden and Ms. Harris bring new diversity to the top echelon of government. Mr. Biden is only the second Catholic president after John F. Kennedy and Ms. Harris broke multiple gender and racial barriers in winning the vice presidency. The Cabinet that Mr. Biden assembled has record numbers of women and people of color as well as the first gay person to lead one of the statutory Cabinet departments.
Mr. Biden, who spent Tuesday night at Blair House, the presidential guest quarters across Pennsylvania Avenue from the White House, began his public day at 8:50 a.m. when he departed for a service at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle with his wife, Jill Biden, along with Ms. Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff. Joining them were congressional leaders of both parties, including Mr. McConnell.
That too was a change in tradition, as most new presidents before taking the oath worship at St. John’s Church, the Episcopal parish across Lafayette Square from the White House. But St. Matthew has its own presidential history as the site of Kennedy’s funeral.
Among those attending the swearing-in ceremony at the Capitol were the three former presidents and their wives, Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush and Michelle Obama, as well as former Vice President Dan Quayle. In addition to Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Sotomayor, four other members of the Supreme Court were present: Justice Elena Kagan and all three of Mr. Trump’s appointees, Justices Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
Mr. Pence and his wife Karen Pence received bipartisan applause when they arrived at the Capitol in appreciation for their show of respect for the transition of power despite Mr. Trump’s snub. It was Mr. Pence’s first visit since he was rushed out of the Senate chamber two weeks ago to escape the pro-Trump mob, some of whom chanted “Hang Mike Pence” because he refused to try to block the counting of the Electoral College votes as Mr. Trump had demanded.
Performing at the ceremony were Lady Gaga, Jennifer Lopez and Garth Brooks. Set to join Mr. Hanks for the evening performance dubbed “Celebrating America” at 8:30 p.m. were stars including Kerry Washington, Bruce Springsteen, Eva Longoria, Lin-Manuel Miranda and Demi Lovato.Celebrity celebration will bracket demonstrations of getting down to business. Mr. Biden will sign his orders and memorandums in the Oval Office at 5:15 p.m. to be followed a half-hour later by a virtual swearing-in of his staff. At 7 p.m., Jen Psaki, the new White House press secretary, will hold her first daily briefing, re-establishing a regular opportunity for reporters to question the White House that had all but disappeared under Mr. Trump.
The Bidens will then spend their first night in the White House, completing a journey that officially began in 1987 and unofficially much earlier. These were not the circumstances the new president might have imagined arriving at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue when he set out on this path, but history always has its surprises.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/20/us/politics/biden-president.html

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Video Report - "It made him a bigger man": Former U.S. Ambassador to China on loss of Biden's first wife and son

Video Report - #McConnell #CNN #News McConnell: Capitol Hill mob was 'provoked' by Trump

Video Report - Biden honors 400,000 U.S. COVID deaths and prepares for inauguration

Joe Biden’s First Inaugural Event Highlights Failure Of Trump’s COVID-19 Response

By S.V. Date
The first nationwide memorial honoring the 400,000 U.S. coronavirus dead comes only as Trump is leaving and Biden arriving in office.
Just a half-mile from where President Donald Trump is spending his final night in the White House, twin rows of lights on the National Mall marked the first inaugural event of his successor — an implicit rebuke of Trump’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic and the 400,000 Americans it has already killed.
At 5:33 p.m., 400 rectangular lights — each representing a thousand Americans dead of COVID-19 — lit up on either side of the Reflecting Pool between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument as bells at the National Cathedral rang 400 times. The scene was set to repeat all over the country, with structures from the Empire State Building in New York City to the Space Needle in Seattle lighting up and bells ringing to honor the dead.
“To heal, we must remember,” Biden said in brief remarks. “It’s important to do that as a nation.”
Trump’s failure to ramp up testing production or to exhort Americans to take measures to slow the disease’s spread has likely already caused 200,000 more Americans to die than might have. Germany, for example, which has an equally advanced health care infrastructure but whose leader took the virus seriously, has suffered 579 deaths per million people, while the United States has suffered 1,220 deaths per million as of Tuesday.Trump, though, has instead claimed for nearly a full year that he’s done a tremendous job, and only occasionally mentioned in passing the Americans who have died. He did that again in a taped 20-minute “farewell address” he released Tuesday. “We grieve for every life lost, and we pledge in their memory to wipe out this horrible pandemic once and for all,” Trump said.
He began his COVID-19 response a year ago by denying that one was even necessary. Trump’s first public remarks on the matter came on Jan. 22, 2020, when he claimed he had stopped the virus from coming into the country at all. In the coming weeks, he claimed it was like a cold, and not as severe as the flu. At a February rally in South Carolina, he told his audience that the whole thing was ginned up by Democrats and the news media to make him look bad and hurt his reelection prospects.
“This is their new hoax,” Trump said.
Even as he continued downplaying the seriousness of the threat the virus posed, Trump began giving out death totals that would define success — and then continually shifted those figures upward as the death tally rose.
On Feb. 26, Trump boasted there had been no deaths at all, and fewer than two dozen total cases. “When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero. That’s a pretty good job we’ve done,” he said.
By April 20, he was predicting 50,000 to 60,000 deaths. A week later, he was saying 60,000 to 70,000. By May 3, he was saying the death toll could be as high as 100,000, and by June, 200,000.
Eventually, he claimed that regardless of how many Americans died, he had done a great job because that number would have been in the millions had he done nothing at all.
“We were expected to lose, if you look at the original charts from original doctors who are respected by everybody, 2,200,000 people,” Trump said at an NBC News town hall on Oct. 15. “We saved 2 million people.”
Even after he himself caught the virus during one of several large gatherings at the White House with little use of masks and no social distancing, Trump failed to exhibit empathy toward other patients or their families. He himself recovered quickly after getting top-notch medical care at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, which included an experimental — and expensive — treatment of synthetic antibodies, and cited his experience to suggest everyone else could, too.
“Here I am, right?’ he told a rally crowd in Allentown, Pennsylvania, on Oct. 26.
Neither the Biden transition team nor the Trump White House would say whether there was any discussion of the outgoing president and the incoming president participating jointly in the COVID-19 memorial, as might have occurred in a normal transition.Trump, however, made clear from the wee hours of election night, when he lied that he had won reelection, that the coming handoff would be anything but normal. Through the entire 11-week period, he continued telling his supporters that he had actually won and that the election had been stolen from him. His General Services Administration chief, the political appointee running the agency that administers an orderly transfer of power, refused to carry out her duty for weeks, making the task of the incoming Biden team more difficult and, potentially, endangering American lives and livelihoods.
After dozens of Trump and his allies’ lawsuits to undo the election results failed over two months, the president ultimately demanded that Vice President Mike Pence unilaterally overturn it by refusing to recognize the electoral votes from a number of states that had voted for Biden. Pence refused, which led to Trump’s angry attack on him for lacking “courage.” That further enraged Trump’s followers, who were at that moment overrunning the Capitol to block the formal certification of the November election.
Four Trump supporters died in the rioting, as did one Capitol Police officer.
In his taped farewell address, Trump took no responsibility for inciting that mob — for which he was impeached a record second time. Nor did he mention Biden by name or acknowledge that his successor had, in fact, won the election fairly.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-biden-coronavirus-memorial_n_600766e4c5b697df1a09c375

Opinion: Lincoln Knew in 1838 What 2021 Would Bring

By Bret Stephens
Before Jefferson Davis there was John C. Calhoun. What rougher beasts do Trump, Hawley and Cruz prefigure? In January 1838, when Abraham Lincoln was a member of the Illinois state legislature and two weeks shy of his 29th birthday, he delivered what was probably the most prophetic speech of his political career. It’s a speech whose time has arrived again in 2021.
The Lyceum Address is named for the Springfield, Ill., association that, according to Lincoln’s law partner William Herndon, “contained and commanded all the culture and talent of the place.” It concerns “the perpetuation of our political institutions.” Why would that matter in the still-young, ever-expanding American republic?
An obvious answer would be the existence and expansion of slavery. Lincoln’s answer is the rise of the “mobocratic spirit” and the sorts of leaders who abet it.
In Vicksburg, Miss. (“the Sodom of the South,” as it was then known), a mob of moralists from the town’s respectable quarters had, in 1835, stormed the waterfront, seized five gamblers and summarily hanged them. In St. Louis, Mo., the next year, a free Black man named Francis McIntosh, suspected of murdering one police officer and injuring another, was seized by a mob of vigilantes, chained to a tree and slowly burned to death.
Lincoln chooses his examples well. The motive of the Vicksburg mob, in Lincoln’s telling, is public virtue. The motive of the St. Louis mob is revenge. The high-minded yearning for moral purification and the low-minded lust for blood are two sides of the same coin, and the effects are the same. McIntosh’s lynching soon led to the expulsion and killing of an abolitionist editor. The Vicksburg mob set a precedent for other violent attacks against suspected threats to public order.
Willfully killing the (presumed) guilty rapidly descends to accidentally killing the innocent. “The lawless in spirit are encouraged to become lawless in practice.” Normally law-abiding people, losing faith in government, “are not much averse to a change in which they imagine they have nothing to lose.” Men of low scruples and overweening ambitions scout their political opportunities.
“Is it unreasonable then to expect,” Lincoln asks, “that some man possessed of the loftiest genius, coupled with ambition sufficient to push it to its utmost stretch, will at some time, spring up among us?”
Donald Trump is not a man of “the loftiest genius.” He is, as I’ve written before, a political arsonist who managed, in his inveterately asinine way, to burn down his own presidency while attempting to torch everyone and everything else. Neither is Josh Hawley nor Ted Cruz a lofty genius. They are credential-holding ideological grifters who lack the wit to see how easily they are seen through. But the three are at least a hazy approximation of what the younger Lincoln most fears — men in the mold of Caesar or Napoleon who would sooner tear down than defend republican institutions in order to slake a thirst for glory. Before Jefferson Davis tore the federal government asunder, John C. Calhoun tried to nullify its power. What rougher beasts do Trump, Cruz and Hawley prefigure? For that matter, for what kind of Reichstag fire was the Capitol Hill insurrection merely a test run?
Those questions are timely in our own age of mobocracy. The president who got himself elected by summoning a digital mob through Twitter and Facebook wound up trying to reverse the results of an election by summoning an actual mob to Washington.
The left is hardly blameless, either. The same people who offered high-toned excuses and justifications for months of destruction of public and private property in the name of social justice might think twice before demanding respect for hallowed American symbols, institutions and traditions. They provided more excuses for the Capitol Hill rioters than either side likely cares to admit. What’s the solution? Lincoln’s answer in the Lyceum Address is what he calls “political religion,” built on pillars “hewn from the solid quarry of sober reason.” Scholars have noted a tension between Lincoln’s passionate faith in reason and a political faith that must be sustained by passions that reach beyond reason — what he later called “the mystic chords of memory.”
That’s a tension that can’t be resolved but can at least be sustained, in part through an understanding that the space for reasoned debate has to be encased by respect for tradition and reverence for the symbols of government. One of the reasons the images of Jan. 6 were so grotesque is that they exposed how tissue thin and easily torn our sense of tradition and reverence have become in the Anything Goes Trumpian era.
When Joe Biden becomes president on Wednesday, he will face a larger job than ending the pandemic and saving the economy. He will have to exorcise the mobocratic spirit that is Trump’s chief contribution to American politics. Summoning the better angels of our nature in his Inaugural Address would be a fitting tribute to his greatest predecessor.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/18/opinion/trump-lincoln-mobs-democracy.html

Video - #NajamSethiShow #NajamSethi #NajamSethiOfficial Sethi Sey Sawal | Who is Culprit in Broadsheet Case ?

Video - #KhabarSayAagay #NayaDaur #PDM - PDM Protest On Foreign Funding Case

Video - Maryam Nawaz Speech at Islamabad | 19 January 2021

Video - Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari’s address at the first death anniversary of Syed Ali Mardan Shah

حکمران جماعت پی ٹی آئی کو بھارت اور اسرائیل سے فنڈنگ کے متعلق سوالات پر الیکشن کمیشن کو جواب دینا پڑے گا، چیئرمین پی پی پی بلاول بھٹوزرداری

 پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی کے چیئرمین بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے کہا ہے کہ حکمران جماعت پی ٹی آئی کو بھارت اور اسرائیل سے فنڈنگ کے متعلق


سوالات پر الیکشن کمیشن کو جواب دینا پڑے گا۔

عمرکوٹ میں پارٹی کے مرحوم رہنما و سابق صوبائی وزیر سید علی مردان شاہ کی پہلی برسی کے موقعے پر منعقد عظیم الشان جلسہ عام کو خطاب کرتے ہوئے پی پی پی چیئرمین نے کہا کہ پاکستان کی جمہوری قوتیں عوام کا سوال لے کر کھڑی ہیں کہ 2014ع سے آج تک الیکشن کمیشن یہ کیوں نہ بتاسکی کہ پی ٹی آئی کو کیوںکر بیرونِ مالک سے فنڈنگ ہوئی۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ شہید محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کو سکیورٹی رسک قرار دیا جاتا تھا، لیکن اب جن کو حکومت میں لایا گیا ہے، وہ فارن فنڈنگ سے آئے ہیں۔ “یہ نااہل اور سلیکٹڈ ہونے کے ساتھ ساتھ اسپانسرڈ بھی ہے”۔

انہوں نے کہا کہ مہنگائی کی سونامی میں کسانوں اور مزدوروں کا جینا دو بھر ہوگیا ہے۔ کرپشن کا شور مچانے والا خود کرپٹ نکلا، بلکہ اس کی پوری جماعت ہی کرپٹ نکلی۔ انہوں نے نشاندھی کرتی ہوئے کہا سب سے مہنگا میٹرو بس منصوبہ پشاور کا ہے، جس کی بسوں میں اچانک آگ بھڑک اٹھتی ہے، اور مسافروں کو بسوں سے اتر کر دھکے بھی لگانے پڑتے ہیں۔

بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے کہا کہ وہ عمرکوٹ کی غیور و بھادر عوام کو مبارکباد دیتے ہیں، جنہوں نے ضمنی انتخابات میں اسلام آباد کو واضح پیغام بھیجا اور سلیکٹڈ کو رجیکٹڈ کردیا ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ عمر کوٹ کی عوام نے ٹھیکے پر کام کرنے والے پیروں اور ان سیاسی یتیموں کو بھی جواب دے دیا جو کل مشرف کے ساتھ تھے، آج عمران خان کے ساتھ ہیں۔

پی پی پی چیئرمین نے مرحوم سید علی مردان شاہ کو خراج عقیدت پیش کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ مرحوم ہمیشہ پیپلز پارٹی کے ساتھ کھڑا رہا اور پارٹی قیادت اور عمرکوٹ کی عوام کا ساتھ دیا۔ انہوں نے مزید کہا کہ مجھے یقین ہے، پی ایس 52 سے نومنتخب رکنِ سندھ اسمبلی سید امیر علی شاہ بھی اپنے مرحوم والد کی طرح ہمیشہ عمرکوٹ کی عوام کا ساتھ دے گا، اور ان کے دکھ و سکھ میں شامل رہے گا۔

Monday, January 18, 2021

Video - #Munich #Germany #BobMarley Bob Marley - Get Up, Stand Up (Live at Munich, 1980)

Video Report - Across the nation, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. honored

Sunny Hostin Slams Trump Allies For ‘Enabling A Racist President,’ Then Quoting MLK

By Josephine Harvey
“How dare they,” the co-host of “The View” said of Melania Trump, Ted Cruz, Kayleigh McEnany and others.
The View” co-host Sunny Hostin condemned President Donald Trump’s allies for quoting Martin Luther King Jr. on Monday after enabling the president’s racist actions and rhetoric and helping to uphold white supremacist values.
“I saw today, unbelievably, in my view, [Sen.] Ted Cruz, [White House press secretary] Kayleigh McEnany, [Republican National Committee chair] Ronna McDaniel, Melania Trump quoting Dr. King, tweeting Dr. King,” Hostin said.
“Those are the same people, like Melania Trump with this birther lie, Ted Cruz challenging the Electoral College [vote]. Kayleigh McEnany just over and over again with her propaganda.”
Cruz, McEnany, McDaniel and Melania Trump all shared tweets on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, praising his legacy Monday after empowering a leader whose values are antithetical to almost everything the civil rights icon fought for. “How dare they. How dare they try to quote Dr. King on the celebration of his birthday when they enabled, enabled a racist president causing this insurrection and attack on our democracy,” Hostin added, referring to the Jan. 6 siege on the U.S. Capitol carried out by pro-Trump extremists.
King said in a 1967 speech that, although society had seen progress, “we must not allow this progress to cause us to engage in a superficial, dangerous optimism.”
“I think that is what happened to us,” Hostin said, citing Kamala Harris’s historic selection as the next vice president, and the wins for Democrats in the Georgia Senate runoff and presidential elections. “I think we saw that ― we are going to have the first female vice president who is African American and Southeast Asian, and we saw such promise with Georgia, you know, turning blue. We saw such promise, and then on Jan. 6 we see that white supremacy is very much so alive and well.”
“While we have some progress, we just have such a long way to go,” she concluded. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sunny-hostin-martin-luther-king-jr-trump-allies_n_60060ef2c5b697df1a083471

The Words of Martin Luther King Jr. Reverberate in a Tumultuous Time

By Audra D. S. Burch, John Eligon and Michael Wines
Dr. King’s speeches have particular resonance today amid a year of sickness and death, Black Lives Matter protests and the storming of the Capitol.

He lived and died in a time of tumult and a racial awakening, so perhaps it is no surprise that the 35th national celebration of the life and legacy of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on Monday has particular resonance amid one of the most traumatic seasons in memory: A raging pandemic. Protest and civil unrest after the killing of Black people by the police. A momentous election. And an insurrection.
Even the title of his final book — “Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?” — seems ripped from today’s headlines.
“I think it’s still an unanswered question,” said Clayborne Carson, a history professor at Stanford University, referring to the title of Dr. King’s book.
“I think the most important word in that question is ‘we’ — who are we, and until you figure that out, it’s very hard to tell where we are going,” said Dr. Carson, who is also the founder and director of the Martin Luther King Jr. Research and Education Institute, which is publishing a collection of Dr. King’s papers.
Amid the change and upheaval, the words of Dr. King, both those celebrated and the less familiar, feel more urgent then perhaps ever before, both as a guide and a warning. From oft-quoted speeches to the words he never had a chance to deliver before his assassination, Dr. King talked about his vision of a just world, about the power of peaceful protests, and about disruption as the language of the unseen and the unheard.
We asked Dr. Carson and others from across the country to choose words from Dr. King and reflect on how they resonate today. Here’s what they had to say.
“Now, let me say as I move to my conclusion that we’ve got to give ourselves to this struggle until the end. Nothing would be more tragic than to stop at this point, in Memphis. We’ve got to see it through.” — from the last speech given by Dr. King, on April 3, 1968, in Memphis, the day before he was assassinated.
The Rev. Dr. William Barber II, a chairman of the Poor People’s Campaign, said Dr. King’s words spoke to the daunting challenge that civil rights leaders faced helping the poor and marginalized. He drew a parallel to today’s challenges of systemic racism, ecological devastation and a lack of access to health care.
The election of a Democratic president, he said, is no reason to slow down.
“It’s not enough to have an election and put new people into office,” Dr. Barber said. “We must push and continue to push for the kind of public policy that really establishes justice.”
“We really must now go about the business of lifting up those who are poor and those without health care,” he added. “That’s the only way we can heal the nation — we have to heal the body.”
“The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”
— from Dr. King’s speech at the Washington National Cathedral on March 31, 1968.
Connie Field said Dr. King’s quote had guided much of her work as an award-winning documentary filmmaker.
“Dr. King presented a vision of an equal, multiracial society,” she said. “He presented a vision of economic equality. And he presented a vision of a political struggle that’s nonviolent. Those are three things that we can all try to live by and strive for today.”
She added: “What’s going on in the United States, what we witnessed on Jan. 6, all has to do with a backlash to the fact that our world is changing. It’s going on here in America; it’s going on in Europe. We’re becoming a more intertwined world, a more multicultural world. That’s the trajectory of history, and there’s no going back on that. That quote completely underscores everything I’m talking about — a just world is an equal world, equal no matter what our race is.”
“Even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.”Bernard Lafayette, 80, recalled the words from the “I Have a Dream” speech as a reminder that the turmoil the country is witnessing today “is not the way things have to be, and it’s not something we have to accept,” but should be understood as another step on the long journey that Dr. King described, with each shift connected to the events that precede it.
The violence at the Capitol, he said, reflected the fear from some members of our society that they were losing political power.
“You have to ask the question, ‘What are these people afraid of?’ Well, they are afraid they would lose power, they would lose control and the election in Georgia exacerbated that,” he said. “These fears that are being perpetrated, they’re really false fears, because no one is going to take anything away from them.”
“I may not get there with you, but I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land.” — from Dr. King speech in Memphis on April 3, 1968, a day before he was assassinated.
Rutha Mae Harris, 80, of Albany, Ga., said she believed Dr. King’s speeches often warned of the kind of conflict that unfolded in Washington on Jan. 6. Ms. Harris, who marched with Dr. King during the civil rights era, recalled, in particular, the famous speech he gave in Memphis a day before he was killed.
“With the rhetoric of Trump, I myself knew that something would happen,” she said. “This had been building up for four years.” She said Dr. King was a man of vision, but that the vision captured the darkness as well as the light. She noted, “He said, ‘I might not get there with you,’ and, of course, you can read in between the lines.”
“Why America May Go to Hell”
— title of a sermon that Dr. King had planned to deliver at his church on Sunday, April 7, 1968.
For the Rev. Amos C. Brown, the pastor of Third Baptist Church, a historically Black church in San Francisco founded in 1852, the words of Dr. King that come to mind this year are the ones he never had a chance to speak.
When he was assassinated, Dr. King had been planning to give a sermon, he said, called “Why America May Go to Hell.” In the sermon, Dr. King planned to warn that the country needed to use its vast resources to end poverty, and to offer all of God’s children the necessities of life.
The hell that Dr. King stood against is still deeply embedded in America today, said Mr. Brown, who is attending the inauguration as a guest of Vice President-elect Kamala Harris (who attends his church).
“We are about to fall over the precipice into, figuratively speaking, hell in this nation — sure, we ought to be concerned about what’s going on now,” he said, referring to the attack on the Capitol. “But people are just now beginning to experience what Black folk have gone through since the Atlantic slave trade began. Hell.”
“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.”
— from Dr. King’s speech in St. Louis on March 22, 1964.
For Antwan T. Lang, a member of the Chatham County Board of Elections in Savannah, Ga., Dr. King’s words meant we cannot be afraid to learn from one another and understand our differences and similarities.
“My hope is that one day white America will understand that we harvest no hate, but we want to be seen not as a Black man, Black entrepreneur, Black superintendent, Black doctor, Black lawyer, Black teacher, Black insurance agent, Black funeral director, but as a human being wanting to freely be ourselves without having to walk on eggshells in fear of becoming a statistic,” he said.
“It is clear to me that our protest and our plea to America is that we want to be free, to simply be a human being with real feelings, emotions, dreams and goals,” Mr. Lang said, “to be able to live long enough to accomplish those goals, dreams and ambitions.”
“Oh no, Brother Gray. This is no ploy at all. If we are to succeed, I am now convinced that an absolutely nonviolent method must be ours amid the vast hostilities we face.” — Dr. King’s response in 1955 to a suggestion that his nonviolence tactics were for attention.
Fred D. Gray was the lawyer who represented Rosa Parks, Dr. King and the Montgomery Improvement Association during the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955, the event that inaugurated the 20th century’s civil rights movement. The quote, found in Mr. Gray’s account of that battle, “Bus Ride to Justice,” was Dr. King’s response to a suggestion that his commitment to nonviolence was a ploy to gain attention in the press.
“I became a lawyer so I could use the law for the purpose of destroying every act of segregation that I could find,” Mr. Gray said. “There were other people whose roles were to make speeches, and others who demonstrated, but you had to put it all together and do it in a nonviolent fashion.”
Regarding the protests over the past year against killings of unarmed African-Americans by police officers, Mr. Gray said: “I think we’re going to have to go back to what Martin said about nonviolence and social change. All the things that Dr. King did, all the things we did in the Montgomery bus boycott were to get rid of racism and inequality. We were able to do a little bit, but not do it all.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/18/us/martin-luther-king-words-protests.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

Video - #Famous_Speech_Collection #Martin_Luther_King #I_Have_A_Dream I Have A Dream by Martin Luther King, Jr's famous speech on Jobs and Freedom

Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari addresses the inauguration ceremony of Labour City, Sukkur

CHRISTIAN RECEIVES DEATH SENTENCE FOR BLASPHEMY CHARGE IN PAKISTAN

 A Christian sentenced to death for a blasphemy conviction was acquitted Oct. 5 by a Pakistani high court.

Sawan Masih, 40-year-old Catholic father of three, was sentenced in 2014 after a Muslim friend accused him in 2013 of blaspheming Islam’s prophet Muhammad. Blasphemy is punishable by imprisonment or death.


The friend’s initial report against Masih included no words of blasphemy, but a supplement filed eight days later did.

In 2013 after a mosque broadcast by loudspeakers the friend’s accusation, more than 3,000 Muslims attacked Joseph Colony, a predominately Christian area in Lahore. More than 150 shops, homes and church buildings were burned; Christians fled. In Lahore High Court, Masih’s defense presented concerns about the police investigation, initial report, supplement, and Masih’s death sentence on testimony of only one witness.

In the Oct. 5 acquittal, the court stated the prosecution failed to prove Masih blasphemed.

Pakistan remains No. 5 on Open Doors’ World Watch List of places most difficult to be a Christian.

https://www.thealabamabaptist.org/christian-receives-death-sentence-for-blasphemy-charge-in-pakistan/?share=125360

'Foreign funding case against Imran must be made public'

 

Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari has demanded foreign funding case against Prime Minister Imran be made public, stating that his party will only use constitutional and democratic means to remove the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government.

"We want to establish the democratic rule in the country and will only use democratic ways to remove Imran Khan from power," Bilawal said at a press conference in Karachi on Saturday.

During the briefing, the PPP chairperson said that in terms of the country's economy and its health sector, "Imran Kahn government has failed and this is why the people are suffering. This is why we demand that they step down."He also mentioned that anti-corruption body Transparency International says the "most corrupt government" in Pakistan is the PTI government.

Seeking details about the foreign funding case against Imran Khan's PTI, he said: "There are very serious allegations that PTI is a foreign-funded party. Their own member has raised allegations. But unfortunately, whether it is the court or the election commission, the truth has not been put forth before the people.""This is why the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) will protest on January 19 outside the Election Commission of Pakistan and will demand that the case be taken to its conclusion and all the facts of the case be made public," Bilawal said.

He asserted that the public must be made aware of the countries that "gave so much money to PTI".

He said he believes "if such a senior member has provided proof of such a serious allegation", the truth of these allegations should have been put before the public by now, The News International reported.

The foreign funding case against PTI in November 2014 was registered by Akbar S Babar, one of the founding members of the party, alleging major financial irregularities in the party's accounts.

The allegations made by Babar included illegal sources of funding, concealment of bank accounts in the country and abroad, money laundering, and using private bank accounts of PTI employees as a front to receive illegal donations from the Middle East, Dawn reported.

The Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM), an 11-party opposition alliance, has demanded the resignation of the Prime Minister by January 31.

Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) (PML-N) Vice President Maryam Nawaz and Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari are among major leaders who have said that they will send the Imran-led government packing and have organised several PDM rallies including those in Peshawar, Gujranwala, Karachi, Quetta, Multan, and Lahore since October 16, 2020. 

https://www.bignewsnetwork.com/news/267557400/foreign-funding-case-against-imran-must-be-made-public

#Pakistan - The #PTI government does not have a house for the common man, Chairman #PPP

 Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has said that the PTI government does not have a house for the common man.

Addressing a function in Sukkur to distribute 1,024 flats constructed for the workers by the Sindh Department of Labor and Manpower, the PPP Chairman said that the present PTI government’s housing project is for the rich to whiten their black money. “Whether it is an island or a residential project to be built on the Ravi River, these projects are for billionaires and trillionaires,” he said adding that these are not plans like the ones that Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto had made available plots and residential colonies for the poor during his rule.

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that in the name of operation against encroachments, the shadow of the roof was being snatched from the heads of poor citizens adding that PTI regime is anti-worker and unless it is ousted, workers will not get their rights.

He said that the provinces were not being given their due share under NFC, institutions like EOIB were not being handed over to the provinces. “Gas was not being provided, while preparations were being made to snatch institutions like NICVD,” he added.

PPP Chairman said that the formula under which the notification has been issued by the federal government for the occupation of hospitals in Sindh is the same formula due to which the health system in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has come to a standstill.

He said that he wanted to empower the workers to have the right to register themselves adding he would soon introduce Benazir Mazdoor Card from Sindh government. He said that despite the financial difficulties, the Sindh government has completed the Labor City plan for the workers, which has provided accommodation as well as treatment and vocational training to the children of the workers.

Meanwhile, the PPP Chairman also inaugurated the Children’s Emergency Satellite Center set up by the Sindh government in Sukkur, where treatment facilities are absolutely free.

Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah, PPP Sindh President Nisar Ahmad Khuhro, Provincial Ministers Saeed Ghani, Nasir Hussain Shah, Jam Ikramullah, Owais Shah, Imtiaz Sheikh and Sohail Anwar Sial, MNA Shazia Marri, Farrukh Shah, Nawab Wasan and Arsalan Sheikh were also present on both occasions.

https://www.ppp.org.pk/pr/24310/

پی ٹی آئی کے خلاف فارن فنڈنگ کیس ملکی تاریخ کا سب سے بڑا نیشنل سکیورٹی اسکینڈل ہے، چئیرمین پی پی پی بلاول بھٹو زرداری

 پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی کے چیئرمین بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے کہا ہے کہ پی ٹی آئی کے خلاف فارن فنڈنگ کیس ملکی تاریخ کا سب سے بڑا نیشنل سکیورٹی اسکینڈل ہے۔ ہر پاکستانی پوچھ رہا ہے کہ وہ کون لوگ تھے، جنہوں نے پی ٹی آئی کو فنڈنگ کی تھی۔

پارٹی کے اسیر رکنِ قومی اسمبلی سید خورشید احمد شاہ کی رہائشگاہ پر پریس کانفرنس سے خطاب کرتے ہوئے پی پی پی چیئرمین نے کہا کہ موجودہ حکومت کے قائم ہونے کے بعد جو اسٹریٹجک فیصلے لیئے گئے، ان کے نتیجے میں پاکستان کو نقصان ہوا ہے۔ میں نے سنا ہے کہ پی ٹی آئی کو فنڈنگ کرنے والے لوگوں کی فہرست میں بھارت اور اسرائیل کے شہری بھی شامل ہیں۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ ہر پاکستانی کے ذہن میں سوال اٹھ رہے ہیں کہ بھارت اور اسرائیل کے شہریوں نے کیوں فنڈنگ کی اور جواب میں موجودہ حکومت نے ان کو کیا دیا ہے۔

انہوں نے مزید کہا کہ الیکشن کمیشن پی ٹی آئی کے خلاف فارن فنڈنگ کیس کے حقائق عوام کے سامنے لائے، جو خود تسلیم کر چکی ہے کہ فنڈنگ کے دوران اگر کچھ غلط ہوا ہے تو اس کا ذمیدار ان کا ایجنٹ ہے۔ ان کا کہنا تھا کہ حکمران جماعت کے خلاف فارن فنڈنگ کیس کے حقائق کو چھپانے کی خاطر پی ٹی آئی اور اس کے سہولتکاروں نے پیپلز پارٹی کے خلاف جھوٹے الزامات لگائے ہیں۔

بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے زور دیا کہ ہر ادارے کو غیرجانبدار اور غیر سیاسی ہونا چاہیئے۔ 2018ع کے متنازعہ انتخابات سے پورے ملک پر منفی اثرات مرتب ہوئے ہیں۔ الیکشن کمیشن کی جانب سے پیپلز پارٹی کو 18 جنوری کو طلب کرنا سیاسی اقدم تھا۔

انہوں نے کہا کہ پی ڈی ایم میں شامل سب جماعتیں ایک پیج پر ہیں کہ نیب ایک متنازعہ ادارہ بن چکا ہے۔ نیب سکھر تو مختلف جگہوں سے آنے والی ٹیلیفون کالز پر چلتا ہے، جسے حکم دیا جاتا ہے کہ پیپلز پارٹی کے امیدواران اور ارکان اسمبلی کو ہراساں کرو، اور وہ اس پر عمل بھی کرتا ہے۔ خورشید شاہ کے خلاف کوئی کیس نہیں ہے، بلاجواز جیل میں رکھا ہوا ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ نیب اتنا سیاسی ادارہ بن چکا ہے کہ جو فقط سیاسی مخالفین کے خلاف کاروائیاں کرتا ہے۔ وہ بی آر ٹی پشاور، بلین ٹری منصوبہ، مالم جبہ، آٹا بحران، چینی کی چوری اوراس جیسے دیگر معاملات پر کچھ نہیں کرتا، جن میں حکومتی لوگ ملوث ہوں۔

بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے تجویز دیتے ہوئے کہا کہ صوبوں خواہ وفاق میں اس طرح کا قانون بنانا چاہیئے کہ انسداد بدعنوانی پر کام کرنے والے سرکاری ملازمین پر بھی نظر رکھی جاسکے کہ کہیں وہ خود بھی کرپشن میں ملوث تو نہیں۔ ایسے ملازمین کے سرکاری ملازمت میں آنے سے قبل اور اس کے بعد کے اثاثوں کی تفصیلات عوام کے سامنے آنی چاہئیں۔

ایک سوال کے جواب میں کہا کہ پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی چاہتی ہے کہ میڈیا سمیت تمام انڈسٹریز میں کام کرنے والے محنت کشوں کے حقوق کو تحفظ ملے۔

دریں اثناء، پی پی پی چیئرمین بلاول بھٹو زرداری نے سندھ کے محکمہ محنت و افرادی قوت کی جانب سے محنت کشوں کے لیئے تعمیر شدہ 1024 فلیٹس کو الاٹیز میں تقسیم کیئے اور اس سلسلے میں منعقد تقریب سے خطاب کیا۔ مزید برآں، پی پی پی چیئرمین نے حکومتِ سندھ کی جانب سے سکھر میں بنائے گئے چلڈرن ایمرجنسی سیٹلائیٹ سینٹر کا بھی افتتاح کیا، جہاں علاج و معالجے کی سہولیات بالکل مفت ہیں۔

اس موقعے پر وزیر اعلی سندھ مراد علی شاہ، پی پی پی سندھ کے صدر نثار احمد کھوڑو، صوبائی وزراء سعید غنی، ناصر حسین شاہ، جام اکرام اللہ، اویس شاہ، امتیاز شیخ اور سہیل انور سیال، ایم این اے شازیہ مری، فرخ شاہ، نواب وسان اور ارسلان شیخ امیت پارٹی کے دیگر رہنما بھی موجود تھے۔

https://www.ppp.org.pk/pr/24312/