Monday, June 22, 2020

India-Pakistan Balakot tensions were never really a crisis ‘in substance’: Ex-US NSA Bolton



NAYANIMA BASU
John Bolton’s memoir ‘The Room Where It Happened’, which releases Tuesday, recounts incidents of 26 February 2019, when President Trump was in Vietnam to meet Kim Jong-un.
 Tensions between India and Pakistan peaked in February 2019 after the Balakot airstrikes. However, former US National Security Advisor John Bolton has written in his tell-all memoir, The Room Where It Happened, that the tensions “never really had been” a crisis “in substance”, though his country chose not to ignore it.
The Indian Air Force conducted the airstrikes on Jaish-e-Mohammed terror camps in Balakot, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, in the early hours of 26 February. This was India’s retaliation to the killing of 40 CRPF personnel 12 days earlier in a suicide attack in Pulwama, Jammu, and Kashmir.

Trump & officials were in Vietnam

Bolton’s memoir, which will be released Tuesday, states that US President Donald Trump was engrossed in dealing with North Korean supremo Kim Jong-un on that day. Trump and his senior officials were touring Vietnam at the time for a summit meeting with Kim, their second after a bilateral meeting in Singapore in 2018.
According to Bolton, it was “the big day”, and the meeting was aimed at launching diplomatic talks between Trump and Kim in an effort to deter North Korea away from its secret nuclear and missiles program.
“I thought that was it for the evening, but word soon came that Shanahan (Patrick Shanahan, then Acting Secretary of Defense) and Dunford (Joe Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) wanted to talk to (Mike) Pompeo (US Secretary of State) and me about a ballooning crisis between India and Pakistan,” Bolton writes.
“After hours of phone calls, the crisis passed, perhaps because, in substance, there never really had been one,” he stresses.
“But when two nuclear powers spin up their military capabilities, it is best not to ignore it. No one else cared at the time, but the point was clear to me: This was what happened when people didn’t take nuclear proliferation from the likes of Iran and North Korea seriously,” he says.

Trump said Modi ‘will be OK’ while cutting Iran oil

In his scathing memoir, Bolton, who was fired by Trump as the US NSA on 10 September 2019, also talks about how some US bureaucrats were in favour of extending India a “waiver”, so that it could import oil from Iran, on which the Trump administration had imposed stringent economic sanctions.
“(State Department) bureaucrats found endless reasons to extend the other waivers, as ‘clientitis’ took hold. ‘But India is so important’, or ‘Japan is so important’, said officials, arguing the interests of ‘their’ countries rather than the US interests at stake,” Bolton writes.
“One of the worst cases involved India, which, like the others, was buying Iranian oil at prices well below the global market because Iran was so desperate to make sales,” he says, adding that India “complained” about being disadvantaged not only because of having to find new suppliers, but also because the new sources would insist on prevailing market prices.
“India’s making this argument was understandable, but it was incomprehensible that US bureaucrats echoed it sympathetically,” he writes.
Bolton goes on to describe a phone call between Trump and Pompeo where they were discussing asking India to bring its oil imports from Iran down to zero.
“In a phone call with Pompeo, Trump had not been sympathetic to India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying, ‘He’ll be okay’,” the former US NSA writes.
India completely stopped importing oil from Iran in May last year under US pressure.
Bolton also adds in his memoir that Trump was concerned over news reports emanating from India that New Delhi was planning to buy S-400 air-defense systems from Russia over America’s Patriot defense systems.

Sunday, June 21, 2020

Video - #Colbert #StephenAtHome #Monologue Leaked Excerpts From Bolton's Book Detail Trump's Pattern Of Corruption And Obstruction

Video Report - What Bolton’s book says, and how it affects U.S. standing in the world

Video Report - #JohnBolton #Bolton John Bolton says Trump ‘not fit for office’

Video Report - We've read the John Bolton book on Trump - here's what he claims

Trump Poses ‘Danger for the Republic’ if Re-elected, John Bolton Charges

 By Peter Baker and Luke Broadwater
The president’s former national security adviser, in a TV interview, called the November election the “last guardrail” against a second term in which “there’s no telling what will happen.”
President Trump poses a “danger for the republic” and would be an even greater threat if he wins a second term this fall because he would be unconstrained by future electoral considerations, John R. Bolton, his former national security adviser, said in an interview aired on Sunday night.
In one of the most scathing public assessments of a sitting president by such a high-ranking former aide in modern times, Mr. Bolton depicted Mr. Trump as an “erratic and impulsive” leader who cares only about his own needs, does not fully understand democracy or the Constitution, is played “like a fiddle” by Russia and is not “fit for office.”“The concern I have, speaking as a conservative Republican, is that once the election is over, if the president wins, the political constraint is gone,” Mr. Bolton told Martha Raddatz of ABC News in his first television interview publicizing his memoir of 17 months as Mr. Trump’s top security adviser. “And because he has no philosophical grounding, there’s no telling what will happen in a second term.”
Mr. Bolton’s book, “The Room Where It Happened,” has become the talk of Washington even before its scheduled publication on Tuesday. The Trump administration went to court to try to block its publication, only to be rejected by a federal judge, and the president has been railing about what he considers Mr. Bolton’s betrayal. But the beginning of the book tour means that Mr. Trump will be confronted with the portrait laid out in the volume for days or weeks to come.
Mr. Bolton, a veteran of three previous Republican administrations, says in the book that the House should have investigated Mr. Trump for impeachment not just for his Ukraine scheme but for his willingness to intervene in criminal investigations on behalf of dictators and otherwise seeking foreign help for his re-election campaign.
In the interview with ABC, he went even further by accusing Mr. Trump of lying when the president denied linking American security aid to his demand that Ukraine incriminate his Democratic political rivals, and Mr. Bolton dismissed the White House defense at the Senate impeachment trial as “utter nonsense.”
Rather than being deterred by the impeachment trial, he added, Mr. Trump became emboldened by his acquittal by the Senate almost entirely along party lines. “He didn’t learn lessons from it, other than that he could get away with it, which leaves only the last guardrail — is the election this November,” Mr. Bolton said.
But even as Mr. Bolton said Mr. Trump had adopted “obstruction of justice as a way of life,” as he put it in the book, House Democrats on Sunday eschewed interest in opening new impeachment proceedings against him. The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee said it would be a waste of time because Senate Republicans were too “corrupt” to consider Mr. Bolton’s statements.
“The Senate Republicans were not interested in any evidence,” the chairman, Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, said on the CNN program “State of the Union.” “They were corrupt in that respect.”
The book’s revelations have been met with frustration from Capitol Hill Democrats, who were angry that the former national security adviser waited until the release of his book — for which he was reportedly paid $2 million — to accuse Mr. Trump of misdeeds that went far beyond those for which he was impeached. At the same time, Republicans dismissed the book as either false or motivated by money.
After Mr. Nadler’s appearance on CNN, Peter Navarro, Mr. Trump’s trade adviser, appeared on the program and disputed several claims in Mr. Bolton’s book. He also said the former national security adviser should be prosecuted.“That guy should be turning in his seersucker suit for an orange jumpsuit,” Mr. Navarro said. “John Bolton has put highly classified information sprinkled throughout a very large book. I predict this: He will not only not get the profits from that book, but he risks a jail sentence.”Democratic leaders expressed some interest on Sunday in calling Mr. Bolton to testify before Congress. Mr. Nadler at first said he was “not interested” in hearing from Mr. Bolton, but later said his committee “may” call him to hear more about allegations that Mr. Trump considered interfering in an investigation of a state-owned Turkish bank.“The president has done a lot of impeachable things, including what Bolton’s talking about,” Mr. Nadler said. “But we have an election coming up. We know the Republicans in the Senate will not entertain an impeachment in any event. That would at this point be a waste of time and effort.”
Representative Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California and leader of the House managers who prosecuted the president during the Senate trial, accused Mr. Bolton of “cowardice” and “greed” but said that he, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others in leadership would consider their next steps. “We do need, I think, to expose the length and breadth of this president’s depravity and how much it is endangering the country,” Mr. Schiff said on the NBC program “Meet the Press.” “Those facts are going to need to come out.”
Representative Hakeem Jeffries, Democrat of New York, another of the impeachment managers, also criticized Mr. Bolton for refusing to testify in the House’s impeachment inquiry.“He is a political opportunist and a profiteer — he had the opportunity to step forward,” Mr. Jeffries said on the ABC program “This Week.” “And he declined.”Senator Tim Scott, Republican of South Carolina, said on Sunday that Mr. Bolton should have testified under oath in the House’s impeachment inquiry of the president, so that he could have been cross-examined on the explosive details of his memoir.
“I do wish Mr. Bolton would have come into the House, under oath, and testified,” Mr. Scott said on “This Week.” “We would have more information about fact patterns that he suggests are true.”
Mr. Scott, however, was one of the Senate Republicans who voted against calling Mr. Bolton as a witness in the Senate trial. Mr. Bolton did not testify during House proceedings, saying he would wait to see how a judge ruled on White House objections. When the Senate took up the case, Mr. Bolton volunteered to testify if subpoenaed, but Senate Republicans blocked him and any other witnesses.On ABC, Mr. Bolton defended himself, saying House Democrats mishandled the inquiry by moving too fast and focusing too narrowly on Ukraine, turning the issue into a “partisan catfight.”
“The House Democrats built a cliff, they threw themselves off it and halfway down they looked up and saw me and said, ‘Hey, why don’t you come along?’” Mr. Bolton said.
But while he said his testimony would not have made a difference in the outcome, he essentially confirmed the main elements of the Democrats’ case, saying that Mr. Trump explicitly linked the security aid to his demand that Ukraine investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and other Democrats. Asked if Mr. Trump was lying when he denied such a linkage, Mr. Bolton said: “Yes, he is. And it’s not the first time either.”
Mr. Bolton said other officials like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper and Attorney General William P. Barr all understood what the president was really doing with Ukraine. And he said the defense team’s assertion that Mr. Trump was only concerned about corruption in Ukraine was ludicrous.
“He wanted a probe of Joe Biden in exchange for delivering the security assistance that was part of the congressional legislation that had been passed several years before,” Mr. Bolton said. “So that in his mind, he was bargaining to get the investigation, using the resources of the federal government, which I found very disturbing, and I found it using national security to advance his own political position.”
Mr. Bolton said he considered Mr. Biden unacceptable and would write in “a conservative Republican” in November but made clear he hoped Mr. Trump would lose. Asked how history will remember Mr. Trump, he said: “I hope it will remember him as a one-term president who didn’t plunge the country irretrievably into a downward spiral we can’t recall from. We can get over one term.” He added, “Two terms I’m more troubled about.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/21/us/bolton-trump.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

#PPP Music Video - کل بھی بھٹو زندہ تھا، آج بھی بھٹو زندہ ھے

#PPP - Music Video - BENAZIR - Teer Bija -

Video - Joint Press Conference with Pres. Clinton and P.M. Bhutto (1995)

Video - Benazir Bhutto, Academy Class of 2000, Full Interview

Video - #BenazirBhutto - Remembering Benazir Bhutto on Her 67th Birthday

Video - A Conversation with Benazir Bhutto - August 15, 2007

#BenazirBhutto - The way BB was, The Boss is gone | By Murtaza Solangi

By: Murtaza Solangi


She would have been 67 this year if her glorious life was not put to an abrupt end. We lost her twelve years ago.As my country floats in the historical arena like a ship in high waters with a lost compass and no captain, we think of her how she would have led us today.
We think of her as a leader, stateswoman, mother, wife, sister, and a human being.

I bumped into her first in a diplomatic reception in Karachi in 1991 as a young diplomatic correspondent. She was darling of the media. Everybody will be eyes and ears when she entered the events. Zia Ispahani used to be her diplomatic liaison then.
One day in 1992, as I entered Reporters’ Room of daily, The News International, at the fifth floor, a letter from her awaited me. It was about “Suicide Wave in Sindh”, a cover story for the WE magazine of The News, edited by late Najma Sadique. The story was about a dozen educated young men of her home province Sindh who had committed suicide due to joblessness. She had waved the magazine on the National Assembly floor urging the government to look into the problem. The letter thanked me for bringing up the issue to the fore and telling me that Nisar Khuhro will be in touch with me about the story. This was my first formal introduction to the first Muslim and the first woman Prime Minister of Pakistan.
Next year she would be the Prime Minister again.
I met her after many years in Washington D.C during Musharraf government when she was in exile again. She would come every year to US, meet people at the Hill, think tanks, journalists, visit media houses, and her party supporter. She would visit VOA every year when she would come to the US. That is where we met out of the country as I worked there.
After 9/11, the security got really tightened in the US. One day, as I entered the Cohen Building where VOA is housed, I saw her entering the security gate. She was asked to put her things including her handbag in the tray. Finally she had to take her shoes off and put them in the tray as well. She walked barefooted through the gate without a grin on her face. I was hit a by a storm of conflicting feelings. Till day, I can’t figure out what went through me. However, I did convey my protest to VOA authorities NOT to treat her like that in future.
She would keep me posted about her major engagements, as I would interview her more often just like Nawaz Sharif who was living in Jeddah then. She told me in early January of 2006 that by the month end she would be in DC. I and Farah Ispahani, who used to head VOA Urdu TV, suggested it to her to have a major press conference at VOA involving not only 44 languages it broadcasts but also inviting major US and international media outlets to cover it. The date was fixed. Thursday, January 26, 2006. David Jackson, the then VOA Director was in the loop and everybody was excited for a major event.
Then out of the blue, Shaukat Aziz, the then Prime Minister of Gen Musharraf visits US and meets President Bush on Tuesday January 24. All hell breaks loose. The State Department put a tremendous pressure on VOA to cancel Benazir Bhutto’s event scheduled two days later. The rationale was that it would send conflicting signals to Pakistan government that two days after the Prime Minister visits White House,  VOA was inviting Benazir Bhutto who would blast the Pakistan government on more than one issues including harbouring terrorism and getting paid for it by Washington. Pakistan Embassy too was putting pressure via the State Deptt. David Jackson stood the ground and didn’t cancel the event. Benazir Bhutto later in her email told me that she really thought that the VOA might cancel the event but they did not. The compromise decision at VOA happened to be that she would not be received by Director Jackson but by the head of the Urdu Service Dr. Brian Silver.
Few days prior to her visit to the event we organized, a story was doing rounds that her marriage was on the rocks and she and Asif Zardari were living separate lives.
Interpol was pressured by Musharraf govt to issue Red Notices to her and Asif Zardari. Washington was rife with rumours that she might be arrested as she lands for the press conference. Journalists we had invited, kept calling me asking if she would really show up. She is more familiar with handcuffs than the bangles she wears, I told an anxious journo, the day before the event.
Thursday afternoon on January 26, Cohen Building opened its Independence Avenue gates after a long time, a practice reserved only for the heads of states and very very high profile visitors. As her car pulled up and the doors were opened, she and Asif Zardari alighted from the car. Holding hands, they walked into the building.
We had put just one chair on the podium for her but she insisted a second chair for Asif Zardari. We had to scramble in the last minute to put another chair for him. Only then she would address the presser blasting Musharraf regime about Interpol notices. “ Show me the court that wants me in Pakistan, I will catch the next flight and be there”, she roared from the podium while taking questions from the international media. They way she brought Asif Zardari into the limelight rejecting the rumours was novel and powerful.
Although I and Asif Zardari hail from the same area of Sindh but we never met till 2006 when she brought him to VOA after she introduced me to him. I will call him on his New York Cell number or he would call me. We would barely talk politics. Mostly we would talk about poetry and music, specially Sindhi poetry and music. There is a lot of propaganda that he would be disrespectful of BB but mine observation was on the opposite. When BB would be in New York, he would always say, “Boss is in town!” Who commanded whom too has been talked about a lot but two encounters, explained later in this piece would direct the readers as to who was really the Incharge.
People usually talk about her great father Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and his photogenic memory but Benazir probably inherited that from her dad too. In my years at VOA, hardly there was a month that she would not be interviewed. One day in her interview that was to be aired later, she was too harsh against Iftikhar Chaudhry. An hour later, her staffer Mr. Narejo called from Dubai and said BB wants to talk to you. “ Answering your question number 7, I was too harsh about Iftikhar Chaudhry. Can you please edit it out?”, that was Benazir.
In the summer of 2006, I went to her New York apartment where Asif Zardari resided. It was a hot afternoon. The lights were on and the interview progressed. In the middle of the interview as she finished answering one of my questions, she said, “ Can you please turn off the camera?” I thought she was annoyed by any of my questions but she said she would be right back.
She just moved to a side, pulled her cell phone and called a doctor, giving the doctor the details about Aseefa who needed some treatment. After a few minutes conversation she was back in the interview mode. “ I had told the doctor that I will call him at 3.30, so I had to”, she said. On my way back sitting in Acela Express train going back to Washington, DC, I kept thinking how she would smoothly move from her role as a politician to a mother.
On Thursday, August, 9, 2007, I came back after doing my show around 11. 30 AM in my office as my work phone rang. The caller ID had 212 area code telling me the call was from New York. As I picked up the phone, it was she on the line.
“This is BB calling”, she said. When did you get here, I asked as I had no prior information about this visit. I am here, she said. How can I help you, I asked. “ Come over tomorrow, Amaranth restaurant in Manhattan, 5 PM. I will be waiting”, she almost summoned me. I said it was a working day for me, but she just repeated what she already told me. I said, OK, I will be there.
Next day, I was back on Acela Express to New York. As I entered the restaurant, I saw Asif Zardari sitting right by the entrance. I met him and asked him where she was. He pointed me to the back of the restaurant, as she was busy talking to somebody while having ice cream. Many would confirm that she had a sweet tooth.
In a little while Bilawal, Bakhtawar and Aseefa too came in holding bags of the shopping they had done. That was the day when she told me about her plans to return to Pakistan on October 18.
“ I am going back. Asif will look after my mom, kids and his business and stay in Dubai. Tell me if you want to go with me. I will ask FB ( Farhatullah Babar) to put your seat on the plane. My party needs me for elections. We will win. I will be the Prime Minister. You have to return and help us”, she said.
Asif Zardari asked to me to persuade her not to go as there were serious threats to her life. I said I agreed on the threats but the void was too big to be filled by anybody else other than her. At that point BB intervened and said Murtaza is right about it and poked him further by saying, you had gone back to Lahore with much fanfare. What happened?, she said. Zardari was silenced after her final punch. She signed me her second edition of her book “Daughter of the East” and that was it.
My last meeting with her was exactly three months before her assassination. On September 27, 2007, she texted me to come to Ritz Carlton Hotel at 2 PM. When I got there, Senator Akbar Khwaja, Shuja Nawaz, Asif Zardari and few other people were sitting there. They were discussing the details of her return. Refusal by Musharraf to get international security did figure in the conversation and so did the conversation with Condoleezza Rice. She did mention the obstructions created by Musharraf who did not want her to travel to Pakistan on October 18. She was adamant. With everything announced, I can’t renege on my commitment, already announced and it is vital for my party to be there, she stressed. The environment was a bit tense.
Little did I know that she had a rough conversation with Musharraf on the phone. All those details came out after he assassination.
During the discussion, she asked me a question. As I started to answer, a phone rang. That was Asif Zardari’s small Motorolla flip phone. He picked up the call and started talking. I never saw BB so angry. “Pinky” she already was but in anger she got almost red. “Do you know that I asked Murtaza a question? It is important for me to listen to his answer. If you have to take care of your personal business, please go outside, finish your call and come back”, said BB. Asif Zardari got up, went out and came back. That again showed to me who was calling the shots and who was the real boss.
She remained in contact with me by phone and email till her last weeks of life. One day, Ahmed Rashid, a mutual friend and one of the top Afghanistan experts, said she was busy talking to many people including himself when I called from Washington, she took the phone call. Rashid later cracked the joke with her that it might be a Sindhi connection from Washington. She would be very kind and accommodative. One time, she was in town but didn’t meet me, so I shot an email about it.  Her confidante Senator Akbar Khwaja called me and gave me the time to see her at 6.30 AM for breakfast. I was shocked but that is the time she had and she did come and had breakfast with me while apologizing at the same time.
The Thursday morning of December 27, 2007, didn’t start too bad. Woke up by the purring of my Coffeemaker set for 3 AM. As the coffee was brewing, I went down from my apartment to the parking lot to turn my car on to warm it up. By the time I come down, it would be nice and warm.
Brrr. It was below zero outside.
In my apartment, it was back to my daily routine. Quick glance at the Pakistani news websites, email check, breakfast, wore warm clothes, filled my tall coffee tumbler and I was out. The show I hosted LIVE at 8 PM Pakistan time, the time in Washington, DC was 10 AM. I had to be in my office at 5 AM five days a week (Monday thru Frdiay) to prepare for the show. It was just a two member team. I and my producer Shehnaz Nafees, a Pakhtoon young lady, who was not much liked by most snobbish staffers of the Urdu Service who didn’t like her Urdu accent. She would come by 8 AM and help me with some of the work.
That day too there was barely any traffic on I-395 and in 20 minutes I was in my office.
As I passed the red eyed security guards, I went straight to the studio. In the studio I had small TV monitors with audio on the mute. We had Geo TV on one of the monitors, to keep us updated on what was happening in the country where our broadcasts were beaming to.
The first call was of course to Ayaz Gul whose numbers I had memorized. So what is new Ayaz, I asked. He gave me a rundown of the major stories and events taking place that day. He did tell me about the rally of Benazir Bhutto in Liaquat Bagh Rawalpindi.
Political heat was on as both former Prime Ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif were back. Both were supposed to address rallies in Rawalpindi area that day. Nawaz Sharif was coming to town via GT Road and mobilize the city to support Javed Hashmi and Hanif Abbasi who were contesting against Sheikh Rasheed.
I started calling different politicians and analysts to record short interviews that I would later use during my show. Then I called Wajid Shamsul Hasan, Benazir’s close confidante in London. As I started recording him, I also kept an eye on the TV monitors to keep me abreast of what was going on.
As I was recording the interview, I saw a ticker on Geo saying that there was a blast outside Liaquat Bagh after the rally but it did say, Benazir was safe. Later I saw a news ticker quoting her Chief of Security Rehman Malik saying she was alright. As I was talking to “Wajid Bhai”, we used to call him, I saw a missed call on my cell phone, that I would always take inside the studio but would keep it on Vibrating mode. It was Asif Zardari’s UAE cell number ending on*** 835.
I apologized to Wajid Shamsulhasan and told him that I missed a call from Asif Zardari. Let me call him back and then I will call you, I told him.
As I called Asif Zardari back on his cell phone, he said, “she has been hit. Pray for her life”. I told him that Rehman Malik had said she was OK and so was the media. He used some profanity and told me in Sindhi if I would believe them or him. I kept quiet. After a little while, the news was out. She was no more.
I still remember that day a call from prominent Op Ed writer Ayaz Amir leaving me a voice message on my work phone. “ My heart is torn apart. Please call me and take me online”, the message said.  For days we cried. People in Washington would stop and ask if we were Pakistanis and then would say that they were sorry for our loss.
One wonders if she was alive how she would have dealt the issues Pakistan, the region and the world faces today. I can say with a bit of confidence that she was on top of her maturity and would have provided much better alternative than provided by others, her party government included.

Video - Bilawal Bhutto - She was, is and for ever will be ‘Benazir’. One without equal. #SalaamBenazir #دخترمشرق

Nation missing leadership of Benazir Bhutto amidst challenges: Bilawal Bhutto

Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, on Saturday, said that nation was
missing sagacious leadership of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto when the country was facing extraordinary internal and external challenges. In his message on the 67th birthday of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto, he said that extraordinary challenges and difficult times were the actual litmus tests of the leadership and she always succeeded in overcoming such crises and finally embraced them martyrdom fighting the enemies of the country, said a press release issued here. He said that as the first elected woman Prime Minister of the Muslim world Shaheed Mohtarma left innumerable and ineradicable imprints and impact on Pakistan’s politics, economy, society, and the defense vision.
“Restoration of 1973 Constitution in its original form, transfer of power to the Parliament, provincial autonomy, NFC Award, identity to the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Gilgit-Baltistan, representation for women and minorities among other marginalized and weak segments at every forum, programs for poverty alleviation, projects for development and welfare of people, and elimination of extremism and terrorism and different other steps are in fact, the result of the life-long struggle of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto,” he added.
Bilawal Bhutto said Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir continued her struggle despite the loss of her great father and two brothers for the people’s rights fighting against the two brutal dictators finally defeating them through peaceful political agitation.
He said that thoughts and vision of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto were still the actual resistance against the regressive and exploiting elements who consider people as herds of the animal. “Forces who are scared of an unarmed girl yesterday are afraid of her name today,” he added.
Bilawal said these were the same individuals and their retrogressive thinking who remain busy in conspiring to remove name of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto from institutions and landmarks though they could not remove the memories of her father Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto while Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto shall also remain in the hearts and minds of 220 million people and their future generations.
He said that though Shaheed Mohtarma was not present physically among us her vision and philosophy remain as the key and guiding light towards the glittering future of our nation.
Bilawal pledged that PPP would strictly follow and adhere to the mission of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir for strengthening of the democracy, rule of law and the Constitution, respect to human rights, eradication of poverty and an egalitarian society.
“For accomplishing this mission, the PPP leadership and workers will always be ready to offer every sacrifice during their generation to generation struggle,” he added.

https://nation.com.pk/21-Jun-2020/nation-missing-leadership-of-benazir-bhutto-amidst-challenges-bilawal-bhutto

Happy Birthday To The Icon Of Bravery – Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto

By Arhama Altaf
On June 21 (today) the entire nation is remembering Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto,the former Prime Minister of Pakistan, on her 67th birth anniversary.Benazir Bhutto was a Pakistani politician who served as Prime Minister of Pakistan from 1988 to 1990 and again from 1993 to 1996. She was the first woman to head a democratic government in a Muslim majority nation.
Her struggles for democracy are already a part of our history and a source of inspiration for the party workers.
She used to run her party in a democratic way, which ultimately strengthened unity within the party. Bhutto used to be extremely fair and impartial when allotting party tickets during elections.
She used to consult with Party Presidents and Secretaries on the district level to make the best possible and informed decision.
Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari in his message on the birthday of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto said that the extraordinary challenges and difficult times were the actual litmus test of the leadership, and she always succeeded in overcoming such crises, and finally embraced martyrdom fighting the enemies of the country.
He said that as the first elected woman prime minister of the “Muslim world”, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto left innumerable and ineradicable imprints, and impact on Pakistan’s politics, economy, society, and the defence vision.
“Restoration of 1973 Constitution in its original form, transfer of power to the Parliament, provincial autonomy, the NFC Award, identity to the people of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Gilgit-Baltistan, representation for women and minorities among other marginalized and weak segments at every forum, programmes for poverty alleviation, projects for development and welfare of people, and elimination of extremism and terrorism, and different other steps are in fact, the result of life-long struggle of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto,” he added.
“Forces who were scared of an unarmed girl yesterday, and are afraid of her name today,” Bilawal said.

https://www.bolnews.com/pakistan/2020/06/happy-birthday-to-the-icon-of-bravery-shaheed-mohtarma-benazir-bhutto/

Saturday, June 20, 2020

Music Video - New Kids On The Block - Step By Step

Music Video - George Michael - Careless Whisper

Opinion: The Doom Where It Happened - Was John Bolton gullible or cynical? Yes.

By Bret Stephens

 Karl Popper once said, “A theory that explains everything, explains nothing.” John Bolton’s forthcoming memoir of his 17-month stint as Donald Trump’s national security adviser, “The Room Where It Happened,” offers a corollary: A book that tells all, yet somehow manages to tell nothing. Bolton writes that Trump’s Ukraine quid pro quo was “bad policy, questionable legally, and unacceptable as presidential behavior.” We knew that. He writes that Vladimir Putin “had to be laughing uproariously at what he had gotten away with in Helsinki.” Knew that. He writes that, for Trump, “obstruction of justice [is] a way of life.” Knew that, too.
 Bolton writes that Trump tried to bend the criminal justice system to do favors for China’s Xi Jinping and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Not surprised. He writes that Mike Pompeo, obsequious with Trump in public, privately thinks his boss is “so full of shit.” Not surprised. He writes that, in the midst of a trade negotiation, Trump pleaded with Xi to help “ensure he’d win” the 2020 election. Not surprised. He writes that Trump thought that China’s construction of concentration camps for ethnic Uighurs was “exactly the right thing to do.” Appalled — but not surprised.

 Bolton writes that he is “hard-pressed to identify any significant Trump decision during my White House tenure that wasn’t driven by re-election calculations.” Yep. He writes that Trump’s “thinking was like an archipelago of dots … leaving the rest of us to discern — or create — policy.” Sounds right.

He writes that Trump seemed not to know that the U.K. was a nuclear power and wondered whether Finland was part of Russia. And on it goes: One knockout revelation after another, ultimately revealing very little. If by now you haven’t concluded that Donald Trump is “erratic,” “irrational,” “foolish,” and “stunningly uninformed” — among the epithets Bolton applies to the president — this book isn’t likely to convince you. But the larger question looming over Bolton’s book isn’t about its subject. It’s about its author — and everyone else who joined the administration without illusions participated in it without defiance, and exited it without shame. How do people like Bolton, Reince Priebus, Gary Cohn, Rex Tillerson, or (when he eventually departs) Pompeo justify their witting, willing service to this witless, wicked president? In a superb essay in The Atlantic, Anne Applebaum draws on the inspiration of Czeslaw Milosz’s “The Captive Mind” to address the question. There is the relief, and pleasure, of political conformity. There is the allure of power or proximity to it. There is a profit motive. There is a kind of savior complex, in which officials like the “Anonymous” New York Times Op-Ed writer from 2018 claim to form part of a secret resistance within the upper reaches of government. All true. And all eminently applicable to Bolton. But there’s an additional factor at work, described by Hannah Arendt in “The Origins of Totalitarianism.”

How do demagogues get away with their nonstop lying — even with those who at some level understand they are being lied to? Arendt observed “a curiously varying mixture of gullibility and cynicism with which each member, depending upon his rank and standing in the movement, is expected to react to the changing lying statements of the leaders and the central unchanging ideological fiction of the movement.” A similar mix seems to explain Bolton’s behavior. It took cynicism to work for a president whose character he disdained and whose worldview he opposed. It took gullibility to think he could blunt or influence either. It took cynicism to observe the president commit multiple potentially impeachable offenses and then sit out impeachment on the pathetic excuse that Democrats were going about it the wrong way and that his testimony would have made no meaningful difference. It took gullibility to assume his book would have any effect on Trump’s re-election prospects now. It took cynicism to reap profits thanks to a president he betrayed and a nation he let down. It took gullibility to imagine he’d be applauded as a courageous truth-teller when his motives are so nakedly vindictive and mercenary.

 Above all, it took astonishing foolishness for Bolton to imagine that his book would advance the thing he claims to care about most — a hawkish vision of U.S. foreign policy. That vision will now be forever tarred by its association with him, a man considered a lunatic by most liberals and a Judas by many conservatives. I write all this as someone who shares many of Bolton’s hawkish foreign-policy views. I’m also someone who urged Bolton, while he was still in office, to resign on principle. It’s a shame he didn’t do so while he still had a chance to preserve his honor, but it isn’t a surprise. Only the truly gullible can act totally cynically and imagine they can escape history’s damning verdict.

Video Report - Florida reports record daily rise in #COVID-19 cases as locals dodge rules

Video Report - Judge denies attempt to block John Bolton's book

Video - #HappyBirthdaySMBB - Bilawal Bhutto Press Conference Today | 20 June 2020

Chairman Pakistan People’s Party Bilawal Bhutto Zardari says that Prime Minister Imran Khan has come out openly against the 18th Constitutional Amendment and NFC Award while his Federal government did not help provinces on Coronavirus


Chairman Pakistan People’s Party Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the Prime Minister Imran Khan has come out openly against the 18th Constitutional Amendment and NFC Award when his Federal government did not help the provincial governments on Coronavirus. “Amidst this testing time and difficult circumstances, Sindh was given Rs229 billion less from its due share as Punjab and other provinces also got lesser shares.Addressing a press conference at the Sindh Chief Minister’s House, Karachi, he said that all the political parties have unanimously rejected the federal fiscal budget and vowed that we will not allow our hospitals and healthcare facilities to be snatched at the hands of an incompetent PTI-led Federal government.Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the federal government did not provide any assistance to the provincial governments on Coronavirus and the Federal budget was presented as if Coronavirus was not a problem and a thing of past.  “People had a thought that the Federal government’s budget would be in line with aims and plans to amicably deal with all the emerging challenges but it disappointed and since the outbreak of the Coronavirus, Federal government is creating controversies and confusions.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that it was hoped that there would be a health package for all provinces but the government was making development projects that would bring political benefits to PTI. They showed a lack of seriousness in dealing with Coronavirus and locusts.
He said that the entire focus of the Federal government and the state should be on the epidemic to save the lives of the people but our misfortune is that the PTI government is not sincere in saving the lives of the people in this situation.  It has also failed in building a national consensus against this epidemic, he added.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the political parties of the country have rejected the budget presented in the face of a pandemic and sadly, nothing has been done in this budget to deal with it, nor any challenge to eradicate the locust.  Even though the money was set aside, we were expecting the government to provide a special package to deal with the epidemic at the provincial level, but it was not given. “Unfortunately, the Rs70 billion set aside for pandemic are in fact the funds provided PTI lawmakers to build roads and sewerages and attain political points,” he added.
The PPP Chairman further said that we have been asking this government for two years to set aside money for health, water, employment and other projects but it did not happen which is an irresponsible thinking. Not only it, but provinces’ money from the NFC has been reduced and Sindh has been given Rs299 billion less and Punjab Rs400 billion less. The present government has not given any relief nor has it taken any steps to revive the economy.  The elderly, the middle class, the poor, everyone is worried, and everyone is realising that the Federal government has completely failed to provide health and economic protection. The budget does not provide any plan, including the Benazir Income Support Programme, to curb the current outbreak during the economic situation that has arisen.
Replying to a question, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that he himself was a supporter of the Provincial Finance Commission, and wanted every district and division to get its full right, it can be implemented only if the provinces get full share from the NFC and its constructive benefits reach down the lane.
He said that the health workers are fighting on the frontline and the Sindh government has given them all possible help and will continue to do so adding that he has directed the Sindh CM to give top priority to these frontline workers and in practice you may have seen this happening in Sindh. In ongoing difficult situation, Sindh increased the salaries and pensions of government employees, I am proud that Sindh supported those who worked despite the difficulties, a large part of the budget has been allocated in the health sector.
He said that the Federal government has taken over three of our hospitals during the outbreak, which has severely damaged the ongoing efforts of the Sindh government. “I have been saying before and then I repeat that show one NICVD style hospital all over Pakistan, or where the PTI government has been for a long time.” The national statistics clearly show that most of the new hospitals were built in Sindh during our tenure, most of the hospitals were also upgraded in Sindh, including the three hospitals which have been snatched from the Sindh government.  “Take a look at Federal government’s budget for them which makes it clear who is serious about improving the condition of hospitals,” he added.
In reply to another, he said that there have been only U-Turns on every utterances on the part of Imran Khan and the present government should be reminded again as it has dealt with the outbreak and the economic situation in a non-serious way. “From day one, we suspected that the PM was against the 18th Amendment and the NFC Award, as well as the 1973 Constitution. At first, he opposed it privately, but now he is openly opposing the 1973 Constitution,” he added stressing that PTI allies should secede from the government after the PM’s position on the constitution came to light.
Asked about Akhtar Mengal, he said that Akhtar Mengal has taken a good step for the rights of his province and hoped that he would stand by his decision.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari was asked that during his visit, the PM accepted the invitation of a Wadera in Larkana instead of offering condolences to the families of those killed in the PIA plane crash; he said that the PM did not come on CM’s request but a contractor and his visit to Larkana was not political but non-political, where he was given a banquet.
To a question, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that if people came out of their homes for NFC award, 18th amendment, missing persons, targeted killings and economic situation, the government will not be able to handle them. Like America, we also have many fault lines. We have remained silent on the ongoing pandemic situation in the country to maintain unity. After the outbreak of the pandemic, we invited the government to work together and said that it will try to meet these challenges together but the PM started politicising the Sindh government’s initiatives which was working to deal with the pandemic and he rushed in an army of Federal ministers against it. Even the doctors who were saving the lives of the people were not spared.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari was asked if he would go to court against the decision on the NFC award, he said that the Leader of the Opposition is currently in isolation due to Coronavirus. After his recovery, all political parties will take up the matter and after consultation, a joint strategy will be adopted for which all options, including the court, are available.
Replying to another regarding Justice Qazi Faez Isa, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that the issue of surveillance of a judge has come to light in the case of Faez Isa which is a very serious matter.
He said that PPP believes that corruption exists at every level and serious efforts should be made to eradicate it, but unfortunately the aim of the present government is not to eradicate corruption but to inflict political revenge on its political opponents in the name of corruption.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari pointed out that current locust attack is the biggest in 25 years and Sindh government has been appealing to the Federal government for a year to take the matter seriously but this issue has been ignored and no help was extended to farmers by Federal government while the provincial governments are trying to deal with it on their own.
The Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that Sindh government was investigating the terrorist incidents and action would be taken against the accused involved in the attack on paramilitary Rangers.

#HappyBirthdaySMBB - President Asif Ali Zardari’s message on Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto’s birth anniversary

Pakistan Peoples Party has completed the mission of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto by restoring the constitution to its true form and still believes in a strong parliament.
Former President of Pakistan and President Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians, Asif Ali Zardari said this in his message on the birth anniversary of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto.
President Zardari in his message said that Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto defeated two dictators by her valiant struggle. Her struggle has been a milestone for all democratic loving people. Her foreign policy signifies respect of the country and the PPP returned the authority for chalking out such foreign policy to the parliament.
President Asif Ali Zardari said that PPP is still fighting the anti-democratic mindset and those who criticise the Charter of Democracy are the remnants of dictators. The people are the greatest judge after the Allah Almighty, he concluded.

PTI's coalition partners at Centre should part ways if they wish to remain loyal to the country: Bilawal

All government allies should "quickly announce their separation from the coalition if they wish to avoid committing treason" against the country, PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said Saturday.
“Akhtar Mengal has played a positive role. Now there is no valid reason for him to stay with this government,” said Bilawal, adding: “I hope he will stick to his decision."
Bilawal's words come three days after Balochistan National Party-Mengal (BNP-M) leader Akhtar Mengal announced that his party was breaking its alliance with the ruling coalition.Following the announcement, government representatives, chiefly defence minister Pervez Khattak, have been tasked with placating Mengal and bringing him back into the fold. Yesterday, Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, who is also a signatory to the agreement signed between both sides, said: "[Mengal] mentioned an agreement with us [PTI], we are still bound by it." He said that the PTI will establish contact with Mengal to persuade him to review his decision.
Meanwhile, Bilawal, in today's media briefing, said that Prime Minister Imran Khan’s opposition to the 18th constitutional amendment and the National Finance Commission award to the provinces is now “plain for all to see”.
“He is even against the 1973 Constitution,” the PPP chairman claimed, censuring the government for “speaking against the 18th Amendment and NFC award while on a visit to Sindh”. He said that the premier “should have at least stopped to think of where he is” before speaking out against the province.
Bilawal said it was highly regrettable that the premier likened Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah to a “dictator”.
“Their true face has started to reveal itself,” the PPP chairman said.
He said that “for humanity’s sake” the premier should not have attacked the province at a time when it is important for all stakeholders to unite in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic.
“The Lady Reading Hospital is run by a relative of his. They should try to compete with Jinnah Hospital,” said Bilawal.
He added that the government would be hard-pressed to find even one hospital at par with the quality of the National Insititute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD). He said if the government is able to point out even one that comes up to its standards, the province will surrender control of all three hospitals sought by the government – the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC) and the National Institute of Child Health (NICH).
The PPP chairman said that the province had witnessed a great economic fallout as a result of the pandemic and the upcoming budgetary allocation is a great injustice with hospitals.
He claimed that the government has announced a Rs70 billion budget but under the fine print, one will find that the amount is kept aside for a "slush fund" to be used by PTI MNAs.
"The government has cut down the budgets of the provinces and expects us to fight the outbreak on our own," he said.
Sindh's share of the NFC award has been slashed by some Rs230 billion.
Bilawal said the PPP government, meanwhile, has placed great emphasis on health. “We have ramped up the number of our hospitals and testing facilities on a war footing,” he said.
The PPP chairman said that government should take into account the recommendation by the WHO which calls for intermittent two-week lockdowns.
"This fast crumbling wall will soon topple over. We need a serious prime minister," Bilawal said.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/675343-ptis-coalition-partners-at-centre-should-part-ways-if-they-wish-to-remain-loyal-to-the-country-bilawal

Bilawal seeks JIT on 'surveillance of judges'

Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto on Saturday declared that the “surveillance of judges” was a grave issue and stated that the Supreme Court should institute a joint investigation team (JIT) on the matter.
“Pakistan Peoples Party has demanded that if references against judges can be filed, then a JIT should also be formed against those who had brought the information against Justice Qazi Faez Isa,” he said.
The PPP chairman made these remarks while addressing a press conference at the Chief Minister’s House in Karachi.
He observed that the joint opposition had given its viewpoint on the quashing of presidential reference by the apex court against Justice Isa in detail.On Friday, the united opposition had welcomed the apex court’s verdict and demanded the resignation of the president and premier.Bilawal stated the PPP believed that corruption prevailed in all segments of the society but the campaign that was launched to bring an end to it had different purposes.He stressed upon the need to fight corruption and noted that if there were any issues of corruption in the bureaucracy, politics and judiciary, they needed to resolve in a democratic and transparent manner.
He emphasised that until the time victimisation and pressure tactics were used corruption could not be eliminated from the country.
He called for bringing an end to the practice of registering cases which were based on ill intent and sought vengeance on politicians, judges or civil society.He appealed to the top court to take up the issue regarding the cases based on mala fide intent.
Commenting on the federal budget for the next fiscal year, Bilawal said that the outlay had been rejected by all the political parties.
“The budget presented by the government gives the impression that Covid-19 is not an issue for the country and people are not prone to it,” he said.
“There is no preference in the budget for combating the coronavirus, spending resources to save lives of people and improving the economic situation,” he added.
“The federal government should have announced a health or Covid-19 package for every province in the budget and the country has to increase its healthcare and testing capacity.”
Bilawal noted that the government had given preference to development over health at a time when the people in the country were fighting a pandemic.
“During a pandemic, the government is more interested in repairing roads.”
He claimed that the Rs70 billion budget earmarked by the government to fight the Covid-19 had been kept as “slush funds” for PTI MNAs.
Commenting on the locust attacks, Bilawal observed that it was the biggest attack in the last 25 years and the federal government had not paid heed to their requests to address the problem.
Deliberating on the National Finance Commission (NFC) award, he said the notification issued in this regard was “illegal” and demanded that complete NFC should be given to Sindh.
The PPP chairman said that the NFC award would be discussed with other opposition parties during an all parties conference.
Expressing his party’s support for the18th amendment, Bilawal agreed that it needed to be implemented in true spirit and powers ought to be devolved to union levels.
The PPP chairman also expressed his concern about possible takeover of three teaching hospitals in Karachi by the federal government saying that it would affect the specialised training programmes for doctors, nurses and healthcare personnel in Sindh.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2246925/1-bilawal-seeks-jit-surveillance-judges/

#HappyBirthdaySMBB #SalaamBenazir - PEHLI THI TALWAR AB TO TEER HAI

‏شہید رانی، ایک عہد ساز شخصیت

تحریر: آفتاب احمد گوارئیہ
‏شہید رانی محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کا شمار ان رہنماؤں میں کیا جاتا ہے جن کی ذہانت، عظمت اور قابلیت کا اعتراف ملکی اور غیر ملکی سطح پر کیا جاتا ھے۔ محترمہ بے نظیر بھٹو ایک عظیم لیڈر ہونے کے ساتھ ساتھ ایک بہادر خاتون بھی تھیں جنہوں نے نہایت نامساعد حالات میں سیاست میں قدم رکھا۔ بدترین ڈکٹیٹر شپ کا سامنا کیا۔ محترمہ بے نظیر بھٹو کو اپنے سیاسی سفر میں بے شمار مشکلات و مصائب سے گزرنا پڑا، جنرل ضیا کی بدترین آمریت اور اس کے بعد اسٹیبلشمنٹ کی پروردہ مخالف حکومتوں کے خلاف شہید رانی کی جدوجہد سنہری حروف سے لکھے جانے کے قابل ہے۔ محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو نے بدترین حالات میں بھی ہمت نہ ہاری، مشکل سے مشکل حالات میں بھی ڈٹی رہیں لیکن آئین پاکستان اور جمہوریت سے اپنی غیر متزلزل وابستگی پر حرف نہیں آنے دیا۔ آج بھی ملکی اور غیر ملکی سطح پر اپنی جہد مسلسل، جمہوریت اور انسانی حقوق کی چمپئن کے طور پر محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کو پاکستان کا روشن چہرہ سمجھا جاتا ہے۔ تاریخ انہیں ایک ذہین و فطین، قابل اور جراتمند سیاسی رہنما کے طور پر جانتی ہے۔
‏محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو نے سیاست میں قدم رکھا تو ملک میں آمریت کا گھپ اندھیرا ضیائی مارشل لاء کی صورت میں مسلط تھا۔ چیرمین بھٹو کو پھانسی پر لٹکا کر منظرنامے سے ہٹایا جا چکا تھا۔ محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو، محترمہ نصرت بھٹو اور پیپلز پارٹی کے رہنما و کارکن مسلسل قید و بند کا شکار تھے۔ تو یہ تھے وہ حالات جن میں محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو نے عوام کی قیادت کا بیڑا اٹھایا اور اپنے ملک اور قوم کو مارشل لاء کے گھپ اندھیرے سے نکالنے کے لئے جمہوریت کی جانب سفر شروع کیا۔ یہ ایک مشکل سفر تھا لیکن کوئی بھی مشکل اور مصیبت محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کے قدم نہ لڑکھڑا سکی۔ سکھر جیل میں قید تنہائی اور شدید گرمی میں گزرے شب و روز کو انتہائی بہادری، عزم اور جرات سے گزار کر محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو نے ضیا آمریت کا سر شرم سے جھکا دیا۔ بالآخر 1988 کے انتخابات کے نتیجے میں ملک سے سیاہ رات کا خاتمہ ہوا اور ملک میں جمہوریت کا سورج طلوع ہوا۔ محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو دنیا کی کم عمر ترین اور اسلامی دنیا کی پہلی خاتون وزیراعظم منتخب ہو گئیں۔
‏محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کے وزیراعظم منتخب ہوتے ہی آمریت کی باقیات نے اپنے آقاؤں کے اشارے پر جمہوریت کے خلاف ایک بار پھر صف بندی شروع کردی اور جمہوری قوتوں کے خلاف سازشوں کے ایک نئے دور کا آغاز ہوا۔ انہی سازشوں کے نتیجے میں انیس سو نوے میں بدنام زمانہ آٹھویں ترمیم کے زور پر محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کی حکومت ختم کر دی گئی لیکن محترمہ انیس سو ترانوے میں ایک بار پھر عوام کی طاقت سے برسر اقتدار آ گئیں لیکن آٹھویں ترمیم کے ہی کلہاڑے سے حکومت ایک دفعہ پھر چھین لی گئی۔ اس تمام عرصے کے دوران الیکشن کے نتائج کی انجنئیرنگ کی جاتی رہی جو تاریخ کا ایک اور سیاہ باب ہے۔ انیس سو نوے کا الیکشن محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو پہلے سے بھی زیادہ اکثریت سے جیت رہی تھیں لیکن راتوں رات نتائج بدل دئیے گئے اور پورا الیکشن چرا لیا گیا۔ آج تاریخ کی عدالت اس دھاندلی کو ثابت کر چکی ہے لیکن انصاف کی عدالت سے محترمہ کو انصاف کبھی نہ مل سکا۔ اسی طرح انیس سو ستانوے کے الیکشن میں بھی محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کی پیپلز پارٹی کو صرف سندھ تک محدود کر دیا گیا۔ دو ہزار دو کے الیکشن میں محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کو الیکشن میں حصہ لینے سے روک دیا گیا اس کے ساتھ ساتھ الیکشن کمپین کے لئے پاکستان آنے کی اجازت بھی نہ دی گئی اس کے باوجود محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کی پیپلزپارٹی اس الیکشن میں سب سے بڑی پارٹی بن کر سامنے آئی لیکن جنرل مشرف کی آمریت نے حکومت نہ بنانے دی۔ ان تمام الیکشنز میں کی جانے والی دھاندلیوں کے باوجود محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کا کردار ایک مدبر, ذمہ دار اور محب وطن رہنما کا رہا۔ محترمہ نے تمام تر تحفظات کے باوجود ہمیشہ الیکشن نتائج کو تسلیم کیا اور کبھی اپنی جدوجہد کو جمہوری اقدار کے دائرے سے نکلنے نہیں دیا تاکہ ملک انارکی اور انتشار کا شکار نہ ہو۔ تمام تر دھاندلیوں کے باوجود ہمیشہ ان الیکشنز کے نتیجے میں بننی والی پارلیمان میں بیٹھنے کو ترجیح دی۔ محترمہ کہا کرتی تھیں کہ کمزور سے کمزور جمہوریت بھی آمریت سے بہتر ہوتی ہے۔
‏دھشت گردی کے خلاف بھی محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کا موقف بالکل واضح تھا۔ جب دوسرے سیاسی رہنما دھشت گردوں کے ڈر سے کوئی واضح موقف دینے سے گھبراتے تھے تو ایسے میں محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو ہی تھیں جنہوں نے کھل کر دھشت گردوں کو للکارا اور اپنی آخری تقریر میں اپنی حکومت آنے کے بعد سوات کو دھشت گردوں سے چھڑانے کا اعلان کیا۔ محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کو اس صورتحال کا مکمل ادراک تھا کہ اپنے اصولی موقف کے باعث وہ دھشت گردوں کی ہٹ لسٹ پر ہیں لیکن شہید رانی نہایت بہادری اور جرات کے ساتھ اپنے موقف پر قائم رہیں یہاں تک بزدل دشمن اپنے گھناونے عزائم میں کامیاب ہو گئے اور محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو شہادت کے منصب پر فائز ہو کو شہید رانی کا لقب پا گئیں۔
‏شہید رانی کا شمار ان رہنماؤں میں ہوتا ہے جن کا نام مخالفین بھی عقیدت اور احترام سے لیتے ہیں۔ ایسے میں چند کم ظرف لوگ اپنی فطرت سے مجبور ہو کر شہید رانی کی ذات پر کیچڑ اچھال کر اپنا قد بڑھانے کی کوشش کرتے رہتے ہیں۔ حال ہی میں ایک نام نہاد امریکی صحافی سنتھیا رچی محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کی ذات پر کیچڑ اچھالنے کی مذموم حرکت کی مرتکب ہوئی ہے۔ سنتھیا رچی کی اس حرکت کے جواب میں ملک بھر سے آنے والے ردعمل سے سنتھیا کو اندازہ ہو گیا ہو گا کہ محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو آج بھی پاکستان کے عوام کے دل پر راج کرتی ہیں اور وہ شہید رانی کی ذات کے بارے کئے جانے والے کسی بھی قسم کے پروپیگنڈے کو جوتی کی نوک پر بھی نہیں رکھتے۔

شہید رانی اور مفاہمتی سیاست

تحریر: شاہد نذیر


محترمہ بینظیر بھٹو کی شخصیت دنیا کے ان ممتاز رہنماؤں کی طرح لامتناہی ہے کہ جن پہ لکھتے ہوئے الفاظ بھی کم پڑ جاتے ہیں۔شہید رانی کو انکی سالگرہ پہ خراج تحسین پیش کرنے کیلئے قوم کی نئی نسل کو خصوصا یہ بتانا ضروری ہے کہ انکی مفاہمتی سیاست و درگزر کی کیا اہمیت تھی اور ہے۔
شہید رانی تمام قیدوبند کی صعوبتیں،باپ و بھائ کی موت کے اندوہناک غم،اور جلاوطنی کے بعد جب ایک تحریک بن کر اس ملک میں واپس آئیں اور عوام نے جس والہانہ انداز میں انکو استقبال دیا تب اس ملک کی “اصل قوتوں” کے چھکے چھوٹ گئے اور انہوں نے آئی جے آئی کی صورت اپنی سیاسی سازشی بساط بچھادی اور یوں اس ملک میں نووارد جمہوریت کو پراگندہ کردیا جو سلسلہ آج اس سلیکٹڈ دور کی صورت قوم کے سامنے ہے،اس سے بیشتر “آر اوز” انتخابات بھی سامنے ہیں
نوے کی دہائ میں شہید رانی کو طرح طرح کے فتوؤں کا سامنا کرنا پڑا،نظربندیوں کا سامنا کرنا پڑا،شوہر کی اذیت ناک قیدوبند دیکھنا پڑی،اخلاقیات سے گری ہوئ حرکتیں سہنا پڑیں مگر وہ ایک نہتی لڑکی ان تمام سیاسی،فوجی،مذہبی اور منافقانہ قوتوں کے سامنے ڈٹ کر عوام کی سیاست کرتی رہیں۔بار بار حکومتیں برطرف کی جاتی رہیں اور اپنے ہی دور حکومت میں انکے شیر صفت بھائ کو بھی ان سے چھین لیا گیا اور بالآخر حکومت برطرف کرکے ایک اور دھاندلی زدہ حکومت مسلط کردی گئ،یہ دور شہید رانی کیلئے سخت ترین تھا کہ وہ بچوں کو لے کر جلاوطنی میں چلی گئیں کہ کم از کم بچوں کی تعلیم و تربیت پہ برا اثر نا پڑے۔
وقت گزرتا رہا اور انکے سیاسی مخالفین قدرتی انصاف کے ہاتھوں انجام کو پہنچتے رہے،اسی اثناء میں وہ اپنے سیاسی حریف میاں نواز شریف کی جانب تمام باتیں بھلا کر معاف کرکے مفاہمت کیلئے بڑھیں اور اس مفاہمت کو “چارٹر آف ڈیموکریسی” کا عملی جامہ پہنایا جو آئین کے بعد سب سے عمدہ سیاسی،معاشی و معاشرتی معاہدہ ہے۔
۲۰۰۷ میں آمر جب “این آر او” کا معاہدہ کرنے پہ مجبور ہوا تو شہید رانی کی ہی واپسی سے میاں نواز شریف کی واپسی ممکن ہوئ،نئی نسل کو این آر او کا مطالعہ ضرور کرنا چاہئے کہ یہ شہید رانی کی ضرورت نہیں تھی مگر یہ ایک قدم تھا ملکی سیاست کو مفاہمت کی جانب بڑھانے کا۔جب ملک واپس آئیں تو ہر سیاسی قائد کی جانب مفاہمت کا ہاتھ بڑھایا،میاں نواز شریف کو بار بار انتخابات کے بائیکاٹ سے باز رکھا اور ملک کے کونے کونے میں جلسے کئے عوام کو جگایا،آمر کو وردی اتارنے پہ مجبور کیا،میڈیا کی آزادی جو آمر نے سلب کررکھا تھی انکے ساتھ اظہار یکجہتی کیلئے ہر کیمپ کا دورہ کیا،آمرانہ قوتوں کو للکارا،ججوں کی نظربندی کیخلاف عملی جدوجہد کی اور غالبا یہی وہ نکتہ تھا جب انکی جان کے درپے قوتوں نے انہیں ہٹانے کا حتمی فیصلہ کرلیا۔
شہید رانی کی ناگہانی شہادت کے بعد مردحر صدر آصف علی زرداری نے انکی مفاہمت کو آگے بڑھایا،جماعتی مفادات کو عظیم تر قومی سیاسی مفادات پہ ترجیح دی۔ پیپلزپارٹی آج بھی شہید رانی کی سیاسی مفاہمت پہ کاربند ہے کہ نوے کی دہائ کے زخم تازہ نہیں کئے جاسکتے اور ہم آج شہید رانی کی سالگرہ پہ اپنی بی بی کے ساتھ اپنے عہد کی تجدید کرتے ہیں کہ انکے لخت جگر بلاول بھٹو زرداری کے شانہ بشانہ انکی مفاہمت و سیاسی فلسفے کو آگے بڑھاتے رہیں گے.



Remembering Benazir Bhutto: a tribute to a great leader

      BY  




June 21, 1953, is the birthday of Shaheed Benazir Bhutto, the first woman prime minister of any Muslim state. Remembering her brings pain and sorrow of her loss but for me, it is also a reminder of her compassionate and beautiful personality. Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto represented the Pakistan that was beautiful and with immense potential for development and success.
She set the highest benchmark for politics of integrity and set great examples with struggles for democracy. For this reason, her birthday is celebrated every year on June 21 and nationally and internationally, a tribute is paid to her in ceremonies that are organized across the world to remember her great contributions for this country.
One evening in the 70 Clifton, Shaheed BB received a phone call from Lahore. It was Khwaja Tariq Rahim informing her that dictator General Zia ul Haq’s plane has disappeared from the radar. When Shaheed BB insisted what this information implied, he replied that the long and dark story of General Zia’s rule in Pakistan has come to an end. After that moment, she received a flurry of related calls. About half an hour later, a friend of the Bhutto family and renowned journalist confirmed that the remains of the lost plane have been found near Bahawalpur and all its passengers including General Zia have been killed.
Outside 70 Clifton, party workers who were victims of baton charge, imprisonment, and unemployment at the hands of the autocratic regime, were emotionally charged. Some of them carried boxes of sweets. When Shaheed Benazir Bhutto learned about the festive mood outside 70 Clifton and that people were distributing sweets in joy and celebrations, she left her drawing room and went outside the gate. She said, “Our religion does not allow us to celebrate someone’s death.” Some of the workers replied, “But what he did to Shaheed Zulfikar Bhutto…” She stopped them right away and said, “We do not believe in politics of revenge.”
In her book, “Daughter of the East” Shaheed BB wrote about her concern for her close associates at the occasion of her return to Pakistan. The following excerpt displays her thoughtfulness and empathetic nature: “‘Naheed, Bashir, Dara. Stay close to me.’ I told those who had been warned that they would be arrested. It was ironic: my supporters crowded around me for my protection, and I kept them close to me for their protection. ‘We’re your security,’ members of the press said. But it was the crush of the people outside the airport who turned out to be our security. The immigration authorities were so anxious to get us away from the airport that they conducted their formalities on the plane, quickly stamping all our passports.”
Being a woman leading a political party in a conservative Muslim country, Shaheed BB had to make certain personal decisions in an effort not to alienate her people by staying within the societal norms. One day, while surrounded by her friends in the 70 Clifton, she asked my opinion on marriage and whether she should consider it for herself. I immediately replied in affirmative and said, “Yes, you must!” At that time, I did not know whom she was considering to marry but I expressed my opinion that for a female political leader, marriage is necessary to ensure safety in personal and political life and for desirable social status in the Pakistani culture. After July 1977, the Bhutto family had to face several tragedies including the hanging of Shaheed BB’s father, her brother Shahnawaz’s death, her mother’s illness, her brother Mir Murtaza’s exile and her own house arrests that did not give Shaheed BB enough time to ponder over her personal life. Compared to the wedding ceremonies of her siblings, Shaheed BB’s wedding was being held in much better circumstances and her family and friends were delighted to be able to join Shaheed BB on this memorable occasion. Shaheed BB displayed a great sense of generosity by including the people of Lyari to mark this personal milestone in her life. The ceremony was organized in PPPP’s political stronghold, Lyari’s biggest ground, Kakri Ground. That day, her guests and media from all around the world enjoyed the hospitality of the people of Lyari.
My relationship with the Bhutto family has always been honest and filled with sincerity. The reason why I continued to be a part of Shaheed BB’s journey is because my intentions have been pure and I have earned the family’s trust. After she became the Prime Minister, she offered me to work for her and I agreed to it. Like in the past, I started handling international media.
In the last week of December 1993, Shaheed BB went on an official visit to China and North Korea. In her second tenure, this was my first foreign tour with her. Just a day earlier, she had organized a lunch for my birthday in the Prime Minister House. The guest list included individuals who were close associates of both, Shaheed Bb and mine. I was greatly touched by the gesture that she had kept the tradition of celebrating my birthday even after becoming the Prime Minister. That day, I promised myself that I will remember her on her birthday for years to come, and even if she is no longer with us, I try to continue this tradition by sharing her precious memories with her people and with the new generation.
21 June 2019 is Mohtarma Shaheed Benazir Bhutto’s sixty-sixth birthday. Her absence is felt today more than ever. The most befitting tribute to her on her birthday would be to reiterate our commitment to BB’s vision by supporting the new generation who is trying to continue her legacy despite the fact that their father, Mr. Zardari has been arrested and the children’s guardian Faryal Talpur is also under house arrest. Her children, Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, Bakhtawar, and Asifa are the custodians of her legacy and they are all well-educated and capable individuals who will continue BB’s mission of serving the people and keeping aloft the flag of PPPP.