Friday, May 8, 2020

#Balochistan: Roadside explosion kills six #Pakistani soldiers

At least six Pakistani paramilitary troops including a major were killed in an improvised explosive device (IED) in district Kech Balochistan on Friday.
Pakistan’s Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the military’s media wing, said May 8 that the security forces were returning from patrolling duty when an improvised explosive device (IED) hit their reconnaissance vehicle.
The killed Pakistani forces personnel have been named as Major Nadeem Abbas Bhatti, resident of Hafizabad, Naik Jamshed, resident of Mianwali, Lance Naik Taimoor, resident of Taunsa Sharif, Lance Naik Khizer Hayat, resident of Attock, Sepoy Sajid, resident of Mardan and Sepoy Nadeem, resident of Taunsa Sharif.
Today’s attack was the latest in a series of ambushes on Pakistani forces in the mineral-rich Balochistan, a key route of $64 billion China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project.
The Western Part of Balochistan is occupied by Iran whereas the Northern part fell under Afghanistan control after the British drew the Durand Line due to which large chunks of Afghanistan were given to Pakistan. The Baloch and Afghans, however, have never accepted the Durand Line.
Balochistan is strategically important because of the rich presence of copper, zinc, and natural gas.
The Baloch people are currently ‘at war with Pakistan’ because at the end of British rule in 1947 Balochistan declared its independence but their sovereign country was forcibly incorporated into Pakistan in 1948.
Baloch people have fought five wars of liberations against Pakistan, the latest and ongoing attempt to push for freedom started in 1996 which is considered by far the more organised and widespread compared to previous insurgencies in Balochistan.

Thursday, May 7, 2020

Music Video - Dua Lipa - Physical

Video Report - How the top 5 biggest military powers spend over a trillion dollars

Video Report - #Coronavirus #Sports How is coronavirus affecting the sports industry?

Video Report - Chris Cuomo jokes with his governor brother: You're single and ready to mingle

Video - #TrevorNoah #Coronavirus Beef Shortages & Jared Kushner’s Botched PPE Response | The Daily Social Distancing

Ghazal - Malika Pukhraj, Tahira Syed - Abhi To Main Jawan Hoon

Music Video - Salaam | Umrao Jaan | Aishwarya Rai

Music Video - Pyar Kiya To Darna Kya | Madhubala | Dilip Kumar | Mughal-E-Azam |

Music Video - Chura liya hai-YAADON KI BARAT

Video - Tribute To The Legendary Actor Rishi Kapoor | Bollywood Superhit Songs

Video Report - #RishiKapoor Rishi Kapoor | A Tribute To 'Chintu'

Video Report - #NayaDaur #FirdousAshiqAwan Firdaus Ashiq Awan's Explosive Interview After Removal

KPK doctors demand end to privatization of healthcare facilities, seek provosion of automated coronovirus testing machines to medical staff, Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari

Pakistan Peoples Party and the representative medical organizations of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa have jointly demenaded end to the privatization of healthcare facilities in the province.
The demand was made through a joint resolution passed during a meeting presided over by Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari through video link attended by the Party office-bearers of of KPK and different health professional organizations of the province.
Humayun Khan, Faisal Karim Kundi, Rubina Khalid, Dr Nisar Khan and Dr Dawood also participated in the video link meeting. Provincial Doctors Association of KPK President, Dr Zubair, General Secretary Dr Alamgir and Dr Abdul Manan participated in the discussion through te-video meeting.
Young Doctors Association (YDA) President Dr Rizwan and General Secretary Dr Asfandyar Bhitani, Dr Faisal Barakzai, Dr Alamgir Yousafzai, Dr Rodar Shah, Kausar Niaz and Maryam Ambreen also participated.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari told the meeting that there can never be any compromise on protection of front line workers and directedthe PPP Coronavirus Relief Committee to provide protective clothing to doctors in KPK as much as possible.
He said that PPP opposes privatisation of hospitals in KP as well as across the country pointing out that the private healthcare system has failed worldwide after COVID-19 pandemic. “Now it is the responsibility of the federation to help the provinces increase the testing capacity of the coronavirus as in case the doctors at hospitals continue to go in isolation, it will have negative impact on health sector,” he added.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that a welfare state can never subscribe to the narrative that economy is more important than the lives of the people.
During the meeting a joint resolution was passed by PPP and the doctors and paramedical organizations which unanimously demanded a full-time Health Minister in KPK.
The resolution demanded that the Martyrs’ Package should be given to medical personnel who died of coronavirus in KPK. It pointed out that there was zero level lockdown in KP from day one adding that the lockdown should be implemented in letter and spirit instead of easing it.
The resolution expressed concern that the PTI government fights doctors instead of fighting coronavirus crisis. It said that KPK Health Task Force chief Nowsherawan Burki can’t be successful in his attempt to run the provincial set-up through Skype from the United States of America, demanding his immediate removal declaring him the root cause of destruction of health system in KPK.
The resolution further demanded that 3000 nurses be hired in KPK to fill the gap and those already in service should immediately be regularised while the medical doctors in KPK should also be given risk allowance as the Sindh government has started in the province.
The resolution pointed out that the KPK has the lowest number of tests facilities and rampant deaths from Coronavirus are a matter of serious concern demanding that the automated testing machines should be provided in coronavirus testing laboratories.
Joint resolution also demanded that the privatisation of healthcare facilities in KPK should immediately be stopped.

https://www.ppp.org.pk/2020/05/07/kpk-doctors-demand-end-to-privatization-of-healthcare-facilities-seek-provosion-of-automated-coronovirus-testing-machines-to-medical-staff-chairman-ppp-bilawal-bhutto-zardari/

#Pakistan: Authorities Must Be Transparent About #Covid_19 Cases in Prisons

Pakistani authorities must ensure greater transparency about the number of COVID-19 cases in the country’s prisons, and the volume of testing being done in prisons nationwide, Amnesty International said today.
After the first case of COVID-19 was reported in Camp Jail, Lahore on 20 March, official numbers confirmed on 21 April that at least 97 prisoners nationwide had contracted the virus. 59 of them were in Lahore, nine in Dera Gazi Khan, seven in Gujranwala, three in Jhelum, three in Bhakkar, and one each in Hafizabad, Kasur and Faisalabad.
However, this number was dropped to 86 infected prisoners, without any explanation on 26 April.
There has been no reporting of the number of COVID-19 cases in prisons ever since, nor have authorities disclosed any fatalities that may have resulted or the number of prisoners who recovered.
Given the extremely contagious nature of the disease and massive overcrowding, it is highly likely that more prisoners have contracted the virus than official figures suggest.
Given the likelihood that there is a significant number of undiagnosed and unreported cases, it is cause for serious concern if authorities have halted testing or are failing to disclose the number of cases in prisons. 
Rimmel Mohydin, South Asia Campaigner
“As tempting as it is to believe that the virus has been contained so effectively in prisons across Pakistan, unfortunately, we believe the reality shows a different picture. Given the likelihood that there is a significant number of undiagnosed and unreported cases, it is cause for serious concern if authorities have halted testing or are failing to disclose the number of cases in prisons,” said Rimmel Mohydin, South Asia Campaigner at Amnesty International.
Protective measures in prison must be implemented
In March 2020, the provincial governments of Sindh and Punjab announced measures such as early release and testing in prisons. The Islamabad High Court also issued directives to immediately release vulnerable and pre-trial or remand detainees. However, on 30 March, the Supreme Court of Pakistan suspended all orders granting bail, stating that a suo motu (a decision made by a judge at their own discretion, without the prompting of another party) could only be issued by the highest court in the country, and not the Islamabad High Court.
Given that the Supreme Court has blocked attempts to reduce the prison population, it is the government’s duty of care towards inmates that all reasonable protective measures are taken.
The conditions in Pakistan’s prisons – which are often overcrowded, unsanitary and under resourced –  serve to increase the chances of a COVID-19 outbreak, making access to testing even more urgent.
However, no information about the number of tests in Pakistani prisons has been made public, save for the 512 tests that were conducted in Camp Jail, Lahore.
“While testing has been a challenge for many countries, it is critical to ensure that healthcare is just as available to prisoners as it would be to the community at large – including in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of COVID-19. If prison populations cannot be reduced, then authorities must ensure that the necessary measures are in place to protect them,” said Rimmel Mohydin.
Background
Pakistani authorities must ensure that all people affected by the coronavirus have access to adequate health care, including those detained in prisons.
The right to health is guaranteed under several human rights treaties. Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) includes the “prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases” as a part of the right to health. In the context of a spreading epidemic, this includes the obligation on states to ensure that preventive care, goods, services and information are available and accessible to all persons.
Under the right to health, health care goods, facilities and services should be available in sufficient quantity within the state; accessible to everyone without discrimination; respectful of medical ethics and culturally appropriate; and scientifically and medically appropriate and of good quality. To be considered “accessible”, these goods and services must be accessible to all, especially the most vulnerable or marginalized sections of the population; within safe physical reach for all sections of the population; and affordable for all. The right also includes the accessibility of health-related information. 

In Imran Khan’s Naya #Pakistan, a minority commission without minority



NAILA INAYAT

 Imran Khan’s attacks on India over its treatment of the Muslim minority stand blunted, considering his own govt’s poor track record on minorities in Pakistan.

Aminority commission without a ‘minority’ is what Pakistan is promising its minorities.
Every turn the government of Imran Khan takes regarding the welfare of the Ahmadiyya community ends up in a U-turn. After all, there is nothing new in Naya Pakistan when it comes to protecting the beleaguered Ahmadis.

The latest controversy involving the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government began with the cabinet deciding to include the Ahmadis in the National Commission for Minorities. All hell broke loose by the mere mention of their representation. Within hours, a vile campaign against the community started on social media, labelling Qadianis as traitors, calling them the worst infidels in this world.

The hate campaign

Joining this hate chorus, minister of state for parliamentary affairs Ali Muhammad Khan tweeted: Beheading is the only punishment for those who mock Prophet Mohammad. Ali Muhammad is the same politician who vehemently opposed the child marriage bill last year, telling a Hindu legislator that he had no right to present an anti-Islam bill.
Meanwhile, PTI’s coalition partner Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain showed his disdain, saying the government was opening a Pandora’s box by suggesting that the Ahmadis become part of a minority body when they don’t consider themselves as minorities.
Two voices from within the government, and a troll army on social media were enough for the religious affairs minister Noorul Haq Qadri to shun the “rumours” that the PTI government had made any suggestion to include Ahmadis in the National Commission for Minorities.
The formation of this commission hasn’t pleased other Pakistani minority groups either. They are urging Imran Khan to constitute this body under an Act of Parliament, rather than with cabinet notifications. The demand is to establish something on the lines of the minority commission in India, which was formed after the Liaquat-Nehru Pact of 1950 between Pakistan and India for protection of rights of minorities in both these countries. In 2014 then chief justice of Pakistan, Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, mandated the government to constitute a taskforce to safeguard the rights of minorities. But to no avail. There are apprehensions that this new commission proposed by the Imran Khan government will be an ineffective body with little or no powers.

PTI, the master of U-turns

Why does the PTI government always start something that it can’t complete?
This is a Déjà Vu for the government. Succumbing under the pressure of religious groups is nothing new for the PTI.
In September 2018, soon after he came to power, Imran Khan removed renowned economist Atif Mian from his economic advisory board because of his Ahmadi faith. In 2014, Khan had revered Mian as one of the top 25 economists in the world. He had gone on to name him as his future finance minister. But when Khan was questioned on Mian’s faith and his stand on the finality of the prophethood, the prime minister made a U-turn.
It is criminal how successive governments in Pakistan have failed the religious minorities by surrendering to the pressure groups at the drop of a hat, starting from the time when Ahmadi Muslims were declared a minority by the government of Zufliqar Ali Bhutto through the second amendment in 1973. The decades following this move saw the worst kind of persecution of the Ahmadis. Now under articles 298(b) and 298(c) of the Penal Code Ahmadis preaching or professing their beliefs could go to jail, could be booked under blasphemy and the discrimination at the societal level knows no bounds. Even the mosques of the community and their graveyards have been targeted. All this under the patronage of the state of Pakistan.

Defining minority in Pakistan

To suggest that “non-inclusion of any Ahmadi in the commission is because they do not fall in the definition of minorities” is laughable. What definition do they fall in? Pakistan itself declared Ahmadis non-Muslims. Now, if Ahmadis are not minorities then what social contract do they have with the state of Pakistan? Does Pakistan consider its Ahmadis citizens even human?
The issue of Khatam-e-Nabuwat or finality of the Prophet is a handy political tool. Every political party has used it as a weapon against the other when in opposition and the tables turn when the party is in government. Just the way Imran Khan exploited the ‘change of oath’ issue against PMLN government during the 2017 sit-in of Khadim Hussain Rizvi. Rizvi had then accused the government of committing blasphemy by changing the words of candidate election oath from ‘I solemnly swear’ to ‘I believe’.
The vicious cycle goes on. And the only casualties are the persecuted Ahmadis, and not any political party.
In its annual report the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom again identified Pakistan among the Countries of Particular Concern. The body noted that the religious freedom conditions across Pakistan continued to trend negatively. The systematic enforcement of blasphemy and anti-Ahmadiyya laws, and authorities’ failure to address forced conversions of religious minorities—including Hindus, Christians, and Sikhs—to Islam, severely restricted freedom of religion or belief.
Imran Khan’s attacks on India over its treatment of the Muslim minority now stand blunted with his own government’s poor track record on minorities in Pakistan. Can he get his minorities to be considered a minority first, please? Fighting for their rights shall come later.
Whenever incidents of violence against Muslims in India are reported, some Pakistanis want to “thank Jinnah for saving them”. Wish the Ahmadis who played a pivotal role in building Pakistan could one day thank Jinnah too.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Video Report - Why has poverty level decreased in other provinces, but increased in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa?

Video Report - #NayaDaur #EngineerMuhammadAliMirza Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza | Why FIR Filed Against

India to push for Pakistan’s blacklisting at FATF after Handwara & Keran terror attacks



NAYANIMA BASU
India is planning to make a stronger case at the Financial Action TaskForce (FATF), to get Pakistan blacklisted for terror financing. ThePrint has learnt that India will base its case around recent terror attacks in Jammu and Kashmir, particularly the killing of five security personnel in Handwara last week and the Keran operation before that, to showcase how Pakistan has been supporting terror even as countries are focussing on fighting the Covid-19 pandemic.
While the Paris-based financial watchdog is believed to have given more time to Pakistan to comply with its 27-point action plan, New Delhi has decided to ramp up global pressure against Islamabad, which it believes “is running the business of terror as usual when the world is busy fighting the pandemic”, a top diplomatic source told ThePrint.
The FATF had given Pakistan the 27-point action plan at its plenary in February, failing which it would get ‘blacklisted’, instead of its current place on the ‘grey list’. The FATF had also said if it finds that Pakistan has worked on all parameters, it may even bring the country out of the ‘grey list’.
New terror outfits
India is likely to highlight the emergence of some new terror outfits in Jammu and Kashmir, like ‘The Resistance Front’ (TRF), which the government believes is an offshoot of Pakistan-based terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), another source said. Terror outfits such as the LeT, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and the Hizbul Mujahideen, which have been active in India, all fall under the FATF scanner.
Indian security officials have also noted reports of the emergence of another terror outfit, Tehreek-i-Milat-i-Islami (TMI), and the country is planning to highlight this too to the FATF, as it believes “these outfits are all getting support from across the border”, according to the second source, who refused to be identified.
Plenary delayed but evaluation to go ahead
The FATF’s June plenary has been postponed due to the Covid-19 pandemic, a final call on whether or not to blacklist Pakistan will only be taken in its October plenary, according to diplomatic sources.
However, an evaluation of Pakistan’s progress on the 27-point action plan will be carried out in Beijing on 21-26 June. This will be done by the joint working group meetings of the FATF and Eurasian Group (EAG), sources said.

This group is expected to take into account the report given to it by the Asia Pacific Group, of which India is a member. The final findings from Beijing will feed into the October plenary, which will then do its own evaluation.

Won’t be easy for Pakistan

Pakistan has been on the terror-financing ‘grey list’ since June 2018, and wants to come out of it since it entails immense scrutiny by most countries that comprise the 39-member FATF, which impacts foreign capital inflow into the country.
“This time it is not going to be easy for Pakistan as it was before. The recent acquittal of terrorists like Omar Sheikh will also not go in its favour at the FATF,” former foreign secretary Kanwal Sibal told ThePrint, referring to Ahmad Omar Saeed Sheikh, the alleged mastermind of the abduction and murder of Wall Street Journal scribe Daniel Pearl in 2002.
“Besides, India will now mount a diplomatic pressure on other countries over these recent flare-ups at the LoC that will not let Pakistan escape the blacklist this time,” Sibal said.
On Pakistan’s economic worries, Sibal added: “Pakistan is least worried about the economic fallout of Covid-19. Its economy has been in trouble for long but that has not deterred it from supporting terrorism.”
The former foreign secretary, however, also said it will not be easy to blacklist Pakistan, which has the support of the US for the role it played in the Taliban peace deal, and also the fact that Pakistan is a close ally of China.

‘Pakistan is China’s colonial vassal’: Former Pentagon official

Pakistan joined hands with neighbouring China since after America’s growing relationship with India, a democratic nation having the world’s second-largest population.


With souring relationship with Washington and growing business and strategic ties with Beijing, Pakistan is leading nothing more than a colony of China, said Dr Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official.
Pakistan joined hands with neighbouring China since after America’s growing relationship with India, a democratic nation having the world’s second-largest population.
Rubin believes that Pakistani leaders see in China strategic depth, an ally able to deter Indian retaliation across the line-of-control, and a partner unlikely to criticise Pakistani corruption, its poor treatment of religious minorities and its internal human rights record.
For China, Pakistan can be a major market, provide land links into West Asia, and a strategic port at Gwadar.
In his article published by The National Interest, Rubin said, “Pakistanis will soon realise -- if they have not already -- what a devil’s bargain their country has made. In China, Pakistan has tied itself to a country that is responsible for the incarceration in concentration camps of one million Muslims solely on the basis of their religion and it has partnered with a country that thinks nothing about killing Pakistanis and humiliating Pakistan.”
Now, it is also increasingly clear that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) may be becoming a major road for transmission into Pakistan and, more broadly, South Asia.
“While Pakistan has struggled with moderate succeed in stamping out hotspots where the coronavirus has erupted, communities living along the corridor in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, Punjab, Sindh and Balochistan are fearful that Chinese trade and traffic along the corridor as well as its expedition of internal Pakistani commerce across regions, could enable the epidemic to spread like a wildfire. It may be this pressure which is leading Prime Minister Imran Khan to lift Pakistan’s lockdown prematurely,” said the article. Rubin said that the full danger of spread along the CPEC may not yet be apparent. Weather blocks corridor passes during winter, but as spring thaws the ice and snow, commerce usually explodes.
Many Chinese workers had also returned home for the Chinese New Year, which coincided with necessary winter-related construction delay. But several hundred Chinese workers have now returned to Pakistan to work on the project, bringing the total numbers of Chinese workers on different CPEC projects to between 10,000 and 15,000.
“There is no indication that China has set up any testing and quarantine sites for CPEC workers in Pakistan,” he said.
Dr Rubin added, “Gilgit-Baltistan may be the canary in the coal mine as locals suffer for the sake of Pakistan’s China partnership. It is one of Pakistan’s harder-hit regions. It has only one testing centre and can test only fifteen people daily. While there are reportedly nine ventilators in the region, local doctors estimate they need at least two hundred of them. Pakistani officials have long neglected the region, even while working to strip away its right to self-rule.”
Pakistani authorities in Islamabad may accept Chinese assurances in order not to hurt Pakistan’s bottom line and insult Beijing, never mind that it was Chinese lies and obfuscation that enabled the epidemic to spread so far in the first place.
“It has been easy for Pakistani nationalists to use anti-Americanism and grievances real or imagined in order to shirk responsibility for their own actions and cynically drive a wedge between Islamabad and Washington. China has simultaneously courted Pakistan as Islamabad looked for new partners. Pakistanis may soon recognise, however, that China seeks not a partner, but a colonial vassal, the deaths of whose citizens it sees as wholly irrelevant,” said the former Pentagon official.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/china-not-pakistan-s-key-partner-but-colonial-vassal-former-pentagon-official/story-4kan7FFgiVw36aGRNjs8WL.html

پشاور کے وائرس زدہ عام صحافی - #CoronaInPakistan



ایک خاتون صحافی کے مطابق: 'ڈپٹی کمشنر پشاورکے آفس سے کچھ دودھ کے ڈبے ان کے گھر پہنچائے گئے ہیں اور ساتھ میں ہدایات دی گئیں کہ دودھ زیادہ پیا کرو اس سے قوت مدافعت ٹھیک رہتی ہے، یعنی ہم صحافیوں کی اوقات کچھ دودھ کے ڈبے ہیں۔'

پی آر او : شہزاد صاحب کہاں پر  ہیں؟ میں وزیر صحت کا پی آر او بات کر رہا ہوں۔
شہزاد: جی جی، کیسے ہیں آپ؟
پی آر او: اللہ کا شکر ہے جناب۔
پی آر او: شہزاد صاحب پولیس لائن ہسپتال میں کرونا (کورونا) کے حوالے سے دو بجے وزیر صحت کی پریس کانفرنس ہے، آپ نے ضرور آنا ہے۔
شہزاد: میری تو آج چھٹی ہے مگر ہمارا کوئی نہ کوئی رپورٹر آجائے گا۔ فکر نہ کریں۔
پی آر او: شہزاد صاحب اگر آپ خود آجائیں تو بڑی مہربانی ہوگی کیونکہ آپ کا چینل ہمیں بہترین کوریج دیتا ہے۔ وزیر صاحب بھی آپ کی رپورٹنگ سے کافی خوش ہیں اور تاکید کی ہے کہ شہزاد ضرور آئیں، لہذا کچھ کریں مہربانی ہوگی۔ وزیر صاحب آپ کو خود بھی کال کرلیں گے۔
شہزاد: نہیں نہیں، اس کی کوئی ضرورت نہیں۔ میں کچھ کرتا ہوں۔
پی آر او: شکریہ شہزاد بھائی، انتطار رہے گا۔ والسلام
اور یوں شہزاد اپنی چھٹی کو کینسل کرکے پریس کانفرنس میں چلا جاتا ہے جہاں وہ وزیر صحت کی پریس بریفنگ میں شرکت کرکے انہیں اچھی کوریج دیتا ہے۔ وزیر صاحب اس سے ملتے ہیں، شاباش دیتے ہیں مگر کچھ دن کے بعد اسی رپورٹر کا کرونا وائرس کا ٹیسٹ مثبت آجاتا ہے اور وہ گھر میں قرنطینہ میں چلا جاتا ہے۔
اس دوران نہ تو کسی حکومتی عہدیدار، نہ وزیر صحت اور نہ ہی ان کے پی آر او کی جانب سے  طبیعت پوچھنے کے لیے کوئی کال آتی ہے جن کی پریس کانفرنسز کے لیے روزانہ فون کالیں آتی تھیں، لیکن اب جب صحافی پر آن پڑی تو کوئی داد رسی نہیں۔
یہ صرف کہانی نہیں بلکہ حقیقت ہے، جہاں صحافیوں کو کوریج کے لیے فون آتے ہیں، مگر مشکل وقت میں انہیں کوئی پوچھتا بھی نہیں۔ ہاں اگر صحافت میں عہدہ بڑا ہے تو پوچھنے والوں کی ایک قطار لگی رہتی ہے۔ مگر عام صحافی، عام صحافی ہی ہوتے ہیں عام لوگوں کی طرح۔
اس حوالے سے اگر بات کی جائے تو پشاور میں خاص صحافی چند ہی ہیں، باقی سارے عام صحافی ہیں اور ان عام صحافیوں نے بہت مشکلات میں صحافت کی ہ ۔ دہشت گردی کے خلاف جنگ ہو، سیلاب ہو، متاثرین آپریشن ہو یا پھر حالیہ کرونا وائرس کی رپورٹنگ ہو۔ یہ حکومت کے شانہ بشانہ کھڑے ہوئے ہیں، مگر جب یہ عام صحافی کسی مشکل میں پڑجاتے ہیں تو ان کی کوئی نہیں سنتا۔
ایساہی کچھ پشاور میں کرونا کے شکار ہونے والے صحافیوں کے ساتھ ہو رہا ہے، جن سے حکومت کی جانب سے ابھی تک کوئی رابطہ نہیں کیا گیا کہ وہ کیسے ہیں؟ انہیں کسی قسم کی ضرورت تو نہیں؟ صحت کے حوالے سے انہیں کوئی سہولت تو درکار نہیں؟ اگر گھر میں وہ قرنطینہ میں نہیں رہ سکتے تو کیا کسی ہسپتال میں ان کے لیے بندوبست کیا جائے؟ مگر انہیں ابھی تک خیریت کی کال نہیں آئی باقی باتیں تو دور کی ہیں۔ چونکہ یہ جو صحافی 'کرونائزڈ' ہوچکے ہیں اور عام صحافیوں کے زمرے میں آتے ہیں، لہذا ان سے بات کرکے شاید زعما کی عزت کم ہوتی ہے۔
اس وقت پشاور میں مجموعی طور پر سات صحافی اپنی صحافتی ذمہ داریاں پوری کرتے ہوئے کرونا وائرس کا شکار ہوچکے ہیں جبکہ پاکستان بھر میں 40 صحافیوں کے کرونا ٹیسٹ مثبت آئے ہیں۔ سندھ میں ایک صحافی کی وفات بھی ہوچکی ہے۔
پشاور کے صحافی آصف شہزاد سمیت ان کے تین بھائی بھی کرونا وائرس کا شکار ہوگئے ہیں جو سب ایک ہی گھر میں رہائش پذیر ہیں۔ ان میں واجد شہزاد بھی پیشے کے لحاظ سے صحافی ہیں جبکہ ایک بھائی ڈاکٹر ہیں۔ آصف شہزاد کا کرونا ٹیسٹ گذشتہ ہفتے مثبت آیا تھا مگر اس کے باوجود ابھی تک ضلعی انتظامیہ (ڈپٹی یا اسسٹنٹ کمشنر) یا ڈسٹرکٹ ہیلتھ آفس سے کسی نے متاثرہ خاندان سے رابطہ نہیں کیا اور نہ ہی انہیں ماسک وغیرہ فراہم کیے گئے ہیں۔آصف شہزاد نے اپنے تعلقات کی بنیاد پر ریسکیو 1122 کو بلوا کر گھر میں جراثیم کش سپرے کروایا، لیکن جو پی آر اوز پریس کانفرنسوں کے لیے انہیں درجنوں کال کرتے تھے، ان کی جانب سے خیریت پوچھنے کے لیے ایک کال بھی نہیں آئی۔
اس حوالے سے آصف شہزاد سے بات ہوئی تو انہوں نے کہا کہ 'غیروں سے کیا گلہ، اپنے پریس کلب کے بھائیوں نے بھی کوئی رابطہ نہیں کیا۔ صرف خیبر یونین کے جنرل سیکرٹری عمران یوسف زئی بحثییت ایک دوست کے رابطے میں ہیں، باقی یونینز کی جانب سے کوئی رابطہ نہیں ہے۔ ہمارے اپنے صحافی بھائیوں میں اتفاق نہیں تو اوروں سے کیا گلہ کرنا۔'
آصف نے کہا: 'کرونا وائرس نے مجھے یہ دکھا دیا ہے کہ کون اپنا ہے اور کون پرایا۔ ہم جب فیلڈ میں ہوتے ہیں تو سب کے لیے خاص ہوتے ہیں مگر جب فیلڈ سے باہر ہوتے ہیں تو عام بن جاتے ہیں۔' تاہم انہوں نے بتایا کہ ان کے چینل کے مالک روزانہ کال کرکے ان سے خیریت پوچھتے ہیں جبکہ دوسرے بھائی کے ساتھ ڈائریکٹر نیوز رابطے میں ہیں۔
ایک اور خاتون صحافی ثمینہ کا بھی کرونا ٹیسٹ مثبت آیا ہے۔ثمینہ فری لانس صحافی ہیں اور مختلف اداروں کے ساتھ کام کرتی ہیں۔ انہوں نے پولیس لائن ہسپتال میں ڈاکٹروں کے رویے پر تنقید کی کہ جب وہ ٹیسٹ کے لیے گئیں تو ان کے ساتھ بدتمیزی کی گئی، جس کی ویڈیو بھی وہ سوشل میڈیا پر پوسٹ کرچکی ہیں۔
ثمینہ کا کہنا تھا کہ 'مجھے اپنی حیثیت اس وقت معلوم ہوئی جب میں ٹیسٹ کے لیے پولیس لائن گئی تھی۔ ان کے رویے نے مجھے توڑ کر رکھ دیا تھا۔'
انہوں نے بتایا کہ 'ڈپٹی کمشنر پشاورکے آفس سے گذشتہ روز کچھ دودھ کے ڈبے  گھر پہنچائے گئے ہیں اور ساتھ میں ہدایات دی گئیں کہ دودھ زیادہ پیا کرو اس سے قوت مدافعت ٹھیک رہتی ہے باقی ابھی تک کسی نے کوئی رابطہ نہیں کیا ۔یعنی ہم صحافیوں کی اوقات کچھ دودھ کے ڈبے ہیں۔'
ثمینہ نے بھی وہی بات کی کہ ہماری عزت تب تک ہے جب تک ہم ان کے کام آتے ہیں۔
مشیر اطلاعات اجمل وزیر کی طرف سے بھی صحافیوں کی فلاح و بہبود کے لیے کیے گئے بلند و بانگ دعوؤں کے باوجود اس طرح پراسرار خاموشی چھائی ہوئی ہے جیسے حکومت کو کسی بات کا علم ہی نہ ہو یا خدانخواستہ حکومت ہی نہ ہو۔

#CoronaInPakistan - Whose policy is it anyway?

By Zahid Hussain
@hidhussain


LAST week, the spectacle of the prime minister blaming an unidentified ‘elite’ for imposing a lockdown was bewildering. By doing so, not only was he disowning the actions taken by his own government but also contradicting his earlier statements. That leaves us wondering if there is anyone in charge in these times of an existential crisis. The confusion is alarming.
The remarks amplify the disarray in the federal government’s policy on fighting the Covid-19 pandemic. Clearly, the country’s top leadership sees the lockdown in the light of a ‘cowardly’ action that has only brought misery to the common people. Such skepticism over the shutdown may not be new, but irresponsible public statements make it harder for the administration to contain the spread of the disease.
Nothing could be more bizarre than the sight of federal ministers encouraging people to break the restrictions imposed by the Sindh government and that were among the decisions taken by the National Coordination Committee on Covid-19. Interestingly, the committee, which is chaired by the prime minister, had extended the nationwide lockdown until May 9.
Then there is also the National Command and Operations Centre comprising senior civil and military officials coordinating the strategy. So do these government bodies represent the ‘elite’ that has been blamed for its ‘anti-people action’? Ironically, the leadership is acting more like the opposition.
 The leadership’s whimsical approach is the biggest impediment.


By blaming some imaginary force for a policy that has the approval of all stakeholders, the prime minister can only undermine his own authority, for many people will see it as an admission of things slipping out of his control. It’s true that the prime minister has never been convinced about the necessity for a lockdown. But his recent remarks were disturbing.
In fact, the federal leadership was caught by surprise when Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhawa followed Sindh in enforcing a lockdown in the provinces in mid-March. The provinces have also called in the army in aid of civil authority. The announcement had come despite the prime minister’s public disapproval of a shutdown.
He had said that the Constitution allowed the provinces to take their own decisions regarding the lockdown, but later also appeared to take credit for containing the spread of infection. This contradictory stance from the nation’s top executive authority had added to the confusion in policy. Consequently, the lockdown was never fully enforced. Arguably, the half-hearted action has caused greater damage.
While business was closed down, the restriction on movement remained tentative. So the main objective of the lockdown to contain the disease was not fully served. Even before putting a mechanism in place, the federal government has started relaxing the restrictions on business and certain industries.
There is no smartness in the government’s oft-repeated claim of moving towards a ‘smart lockdown’. It is as chaotic as was the earlier so-called lockdown. Markets are open and some industries are back at work with precautions having been swept aside. With the ongoing battle between the federal government and Sindh, there is not even a semblance of a national strategy in fighting one of the worst crises this country has faced.The leadership’s whimsical approach is the biggest impediment in the way of formulating a more rational and holistic strategy that is required to deal with public health and economic challenges simultaneously. In fact, those in charge have never seriously considered the crisis primarily as a public health issue.What has not been understood is that the economy cannot be restored without containing the infection. That is the reason why almost all countries facing the pandemic have given priority to public health rather than the economy. Many of them have started opening their economies incrementally after the infection reached its peak and the curve began to decline.

While the lockdown is often blamed for causing economic hardship, there is seldom any talk at the federal level about the adverse impact of the disease. It is true that the shutdown has caused massive losses to the economy and has worsened the plight of the masses. But the unchecked spread of the deadly virus could wreak much greater havoc, as has been witnessed in many parts of the world. It is evident that countries which took timely action and enforced strict restrictions on movement have been able to contain the effects of the pandemic and have come out of the crisis faster.
Our muddled policy may cause greater damage. The failure to enforce strict restrictions on social distancing and congregations may lead to a greater public health and economic disaster. The government has also warned of reimposing the lockdown if the spread of infection worsens, but it would have been more prudent to take strict measures in the first place rather than risk a resurgence.
What we are witnessing now is the abrupt and unplanned opening of all kinds of businesses. The spectacle of people thronging the markets is alarming. It’s all happening as the number of coronavirus cases in the country has crossed the 20,000 mark. The death toll has shot up. According to the government’s own estimates, the pandemic will hit its peak in the next two weeks.
Most worrisome is the fact that a large number of Pakistani expatriates brought back especially from the Gulf countries have been diagnosed with Covid-19. The situation could worsen with the unravelling of the restrictions in many parts of the country. The theory that Pakistan with its large youth population and warmer climate may not be as badly hit as other countries has yet to be substantiated. Trivialising the danger could be disastrous. In the absence of credible data, all projections are questionable.
In the midst of the pandemic, the leadership’s remarks do not help boost public confidence in its ability to lead the nation out of the crisis. Instead of uniting the country to deal with the challenge, the federal government’s policy has widened divisions. It’s for the prime minister to show statesmanship and refrain from any move that could cause confusion.

In #Pakistan, mosques become #CoronaInPakistan battleground issue


By

Tens of thousands of mosques across the country were reopened late last month, despite the coronavirus pandemic.

As night falls, worshippers file into the Abdullah bin Masood mosque, in the Pakistani capital Islamabad, hurrying up the steps to attend newly recommenced congregational prayers.
Inside, more than 200 people are gathered, separated by a few feet between them - to maintain physical distancing - as they offer tarawih prayers, a special Muslim prayer offered in the holy month of Ramadan.There is not a face mask or bottle of hand sanitiser to be seen, as more worshippers walk past the police picket outside to crowd into the mosque's inner chamber, with its fluorescent lights twinkling off the latticed mirror ceiling."Essential services have been reopened, and offering prayers as part of a congregation is also an essential service," Hanif Jallandhri, a Pakistani religious leader who leads a network of more than 20,000 mosques and religious schools, tells Al Jazeera. In most Muslim countries, authorities have, with the backing of religious leaders, shut down all mosques to the public in a bid to contain the spread of the highly contagious coronavirus, which has claimed more than 247,500 lives worldwide, according to Johns Hopkins University data.
In Pakistan, however, tens of thousands of mosques across the country reopened late last month, after religious leaders prevailed upon the government of Prime Minister Imran Khan to allow them to restart congregational services.
It is a unique decision, among Muslim countries, and one that ties into the complex interplay of how political and social power flows in a country where religion is central to public life but does not have a formalised role within State structures.
The result is a constant push-and-pull between religious and political leaders, such as has been seen over the decision to reopen mosques.
'Islamic Republic' vs 'Islamist' republic
Cases of the coronavirus in Pakistan crossed 20,000 early this month, with at least 526 people dead and more than 6,200 having recovered. Cases have been rising exponentially in recent days, and are expected to hit more than 130,000 by the end of May.
At least 2,682 cases, or 12 percent of the country's total cases, can be traced back to a single religious gathering by the Tableeghi Jamat missionary organisation outside the eastern city of Lahore in March. It is the largest single group of those infected in the country's outbreak so far.Part of the issue for Prime Minister Khan's government - which has advocated for loose shutdowns since the start of the outbreak - when taking on religious leaders is one that goes back to the foundation of the country as a homeland for the Muslims of the subcontinent, in 1947."Pakistan is sort of a unique case," says Ahsan Butt, a political scientist at the George Mason University in the US state of Virginia."It's a case where it's a state built on Muslim nationalism, so Islam and Muslim identity are crucial to the State and the wider society, and the conception of the collective self.
"But it is not erected strictly as a Muslim or Islamist state, like Iran or Saudi Arabia."
As a result, Butt explains, religious leaders and institutions wield a great deal of influence and social power but are not explicitly a part of the State. By comparison, states where religious authority is melded into governance, like Saudi Arabia, have been more able to control their religious establishments during the coronavirus outbreak, shutting down places of worship, including the holiest site in Islam, the Kaaba.
"So this leads to a dichotomy: that Islam is central to Pakistan's being, but [religious] actors are, in their perception, outside the State. Clerics may influence the country very strongly, but they are not the ones actually in power."
Religious parties have never won a significant number of seats in Pakistani elections. Butt argues that they rely instead on "latent power, not juridical power".
"Their power comes from their standing and status; it comes from the threat of coming out on the street."
'Impossible to enforce' plan
Tensions came to the fore on April 14, when an alliance of religious leaders from across the Pakistani Muslim sectarian spectrum - a rare occurrence - came together to declare that they were unilaterally reopening mosques for congregational prayers, in defiance of government lockdown orders.
The step prompted the government to negotiate with a committee of religious leaders, agreeing to a 20-point plan for reopening mosques from late April. The steps include enforcing physical distancing guidelines between worshippers, discouraging the sick and elderly from attending prayers, providing hand sanitiser to congregants and discouraging socialising within the mosque.Days later, leading Pakistani doctors warned that the decision could lead to a spike in coronavirus cases. Religious leaders say they will take responsibility for implementing the directives and that the government can act if rules are not followed.In visits to observe congregational prayers at six major mosques in the Pakistani capital, Al Jazeera observed varying levels of compliance with the safety directives. In some, a handful of congregants stood more than six feet (two metres) apart and only those wearing face masks were allowed inside. In others, hundreds of worshippers crowded in, shoulder-to-shoulder, to offer prayers with no safety precautions visible."It's impossible to enforce," says Madiha Afzal, a fellow at the Brookings Institution who studies political economy and extremism."The buck is on the [the mosque leader]. Who is going to ensure that the cleric is doing this? Can there be any authority that ensures this all over the country, [five] times a day?"
So why does the Pakistani government itself not enforce these rules more strictly, forcing the religious leaders to obey government-mandated guidelines?
Afzal argues that this is because of how religious authority in Pakistan is organised - in a decentralised structure not controlled by the State.
"The Pakistani state does not have the ability to be authoritarian in terms of religion," she says. "It is the Islamic republic, but it is not a theocracy. It's a democracy with a very [...] complicated relationship with religion," says Afzal.
Butt concurs with that analysis.
"Pakistan is not a fully democratic state, but unlike Egypt, for instance, where the State can clamp down on protests and collective action and on freedom of assembly pretty easily, regardless of who is doing it [...] Pakistan does not have that fully authoritarian structure," he says. Both experts, however, were quick to point out that the Pakistani state had a history of taking authoritarian measures against other types of actors - those opposing the country's powerful military or advocating for causes deemed prejudicial to national security interests, for example.
Questions of social power
For religious leaders, bound in a constant push-and-pull for social and political power with the State, the calculus in such a situation appears fairly clear.
"If you have religious institution or mosques shut down, then the question arises that you have all these other [groceries and businesses] that are open, does that imply that religious aspects of our lives are less important?" asks Arsalan Khan, an anthropologist who studies Islamic revivalist movements in South Asia. "This is a deen [religion] versus duniya [worldly concerns] problem."
For leaders of organised religion, Khan says "there is a real fear, across the board, that religion will be rendered unimportant".
"When the politics of religion is organised around the sense that religious feeling is essential to the wellbeing of society, then it is hard to argue that mosques should be closed."
Jallandhri, the religious leader, says Pakistanis need to take "spiritual" steps to combat the virus, in addition to hygiene precautions.
"The government has opened many sectors to ease the lockdown," he says. "Our position is that if you open groceries, bazaars, banks, other types of businesses, then the mosque should also be reopened."
There are also very real financial implications for religious institutions if they remain closed. Pakistan's government is largely uninvolved in regulating or financing mosques across the country, leaving that up to independent religious boards and organisations.
"These [mosques and religious leaders] are basically freelancers, and it is a pretty vicious market, with tens of thousands of mosques," says Butt. "They need the donations [and] a lot of it comes from foot traffic - if you cut that during Ramadan, then you cut their income significantly for the year, not just that month."
For religious leaders, there is also the danger of not being seen to adequately protect the place of religion in society, and being "outflanked" by others who are willing to take a harder line.
"If I, as a leader of [a] mosque, don't take the most extreme position, then the second or third in control of this mosque will look to replace me and will have a stronger [or more extreme] argument," says Butt. Khan agrees, suggesting that senior religious leaders who pushed for the 20-point plan to reopen mosques with the government were reacting to pressure from the bottom of their organisations.
"There is a fear [for them] that lower-tier upstarts could rise up," he says. "Whoever can control the politics of the street, has leverage and so [...] more established religious leaders are very worried about these more radical forces that come from the bottom [replacing them]."
Finally, there is the question of how religion may well be something many Pakistanis consider to be an essential service - regardless of questions of social power.
"The idea that wellbeing comes from God, this is not just religious leaders that say that, it is a widely accepted thing [in Pakistan]," says Khan. "This is not necessarily built on an irrational perception of the risk. It may be that you accept those risks, and yet you find that the importance of going to the mosque is greater."
At a small mosque in Islamabad's G-8 sector, questions of outflanking and potential ideological coups at the top of religious institutions feel like distant concerns.A handful of worshippers gather for the nightly tarawih prayer. Across the road stands the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), the capital's main government hospital and the heart of efforts to control the coronavirus outbreak here.
The worshippers stand shoulder-to-shoulder, on a bare marble floor, as the imam begins the prayer.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/05/pakistan-mosques-coronavirus-battleground-issue-200504102030000.html

#UAE rejects #Pakistani claim it is exporting virus

The UAE said it tests everyone leaving the country and bars infected individuals from traveling, but Pakistan says up to half of those repatriated on some flights had COVID-19.
Pakistan has expressed concern that its citizens returning from the United Arab Emirates are bringing the coronavirus to the South Asian country, according to Reuters.
The UAE is home to more than 1 million Pakistanis, many of whom work as laborers. The UAE asked Pakistan to take them home amid the coronavirus pandemic and accompanying shutdowns in the country and 60,000 Pakistanis applied to leave amid a flight ban aimed at stopping the coronavirus’ spread. Many have since left on repatriation flights.
Moeed Yusuf, an assistant to Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, said a few flights carrying Pakistanis home from the UAE had infection rates of 40% to 50%. The average rate of infection among these passengers is 12%, Yusuf told Reuters.
Yusuf said the rates are due to the conditions the workers endure in the wealthy Gulf state. “The hypothesis is that a lot of the laborers live in crowded dormitories and in those, essentially, it’s easier to infect each other,” he said.
The UAE said it is taking proper health precautions when repatriating the Pakistanis. A consular official from the country’s Foreign Ministry told Reuters that Emirati authorities test everyone leaving the country and do not allow people to leave if they test positive.

“Everyone on UAE repatriation flights has been tested before departure, and those found to be infected were not allowed to travel,” said Khalid al-Mazrouei.
People working in manual labor in the UAE and the Gulf, including Pakistanis, often work in poor conditions and suffer mistreatment. They are also a crucial part of the Gulf economy due to the cheap labor they provide.
The coronavirus crisis made their already difficult situations more so. Many lost their jobs due to the lockdowns and economic downturn that have accompanied the spread of the virus. In March, the UAE allowed employers to force workers into taking paid or unpaid leave. The loss of work and repatriations have hurt their families, who rely on the remittances the workers would send home every month.
Read more: https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/05/pakistan-workers-coronavirus-return-uae.html#ixzz6LhJSUtHO

#Pakistan - #CoronavirusPandemic - 40 deaths, 1,400 new #coronavirus cases over past 24 hours


Forty deaths due to coronavirus and 1,400 new confirmed cases have been reported in the country during past 24 hours.
The total confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the country have mounted to 23,655. Of these, 8,640 were reported in Sindh, 8,693 in Punjab, 3,712 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 1,663 in Balochistan, 485 in Islamabad Capital Territory 386 in Gilgit-Baltistan, and 76 in Azad Kashmir.
Over six thousand, two hundred and seventeen patients have recovered from the virus.
https://nation.com.pk/06-May-2020/40-deaths-1-400-new-coronavirus-cases-over-past-24-hours

#Pakistan #bilawalbhuttoleadsnation - Chairman #PPP chaired meeting with doctors, nurses and paramedics from #Punjab

Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party Bilawal Bhutto Zardari chaired a meeting of health organizations of
Punjab on the video link on Wednesday. The representatives of health organizations from Punjab apprised Chairman Bilawal of the fast deteriorating situation due to Covid-19 in the province of Punjab.
The representatives of health organizations welcomed the fact that there is one political leader in the country who is directly taking the viewpoint of doctors. They said that the rate of spread of Covid-19 in Punjab is very high and it is also the province where there is a lack of PPEs and doctors are being targeted in Punjab. They said that in Punjab advice is taken from bureaucrats instead of doctors and even the guidelines for doctors are prepared by the bureaucrats. They said every health worker got risk allowance in Sindh whereas only three percent of health staff is given risk allowance.

The doctors from Punjab said that facilities are not being provided to doctors in Punjab and doctors are hired on daily wages. They have no job security and they are putting their lives online. Positive negative tests are being changed to negative on the recommendation of ministers in Punjab. There is no screening of doctors are conducted in Punjab. A large number of doctors who were tested positive are from emergency, gynecology, and other wards. Doctors in emergency departments are not being provided with PPEs.

Chairman Bilawal addressing the doctors and other medical experts said that the question is where did the money go which was given by IMF and other financial institutions and governments and other sources? Where did all the medical equipment go? He said that the lesson from this pandemic is that we will have to establish health infrastructure. The private health system and its hollowness have been exposed during this pandemic. Health systems should not be run on the basis of profit but health facilities should be provided free of cost.

Chairman PPP said that the federal government sabotaged the lockdown by its narrative. He demanded the federal government to announce a package for the families of health workers including doctors. The federal government should also help the Punjab government and all other provincial governments in fighting with Covid-19. The meeting was attended by PMA president Ashraf Nizami, Dr. Azhar Ahmed Chaudhry, Dr. Shahid Malik, YDA president Dr. Salman Hasseb, Dr. Khizr, Dr. Maroof, Nurse Rubina Manzoor, and Arshad Butt of paramedical staff. PPP president Qamar Zaman Kaira, General secretary Chaudhry Manzoor and Dr. Khayyam of Peoples Doctors Forum were also present in the meeting.

https://www.ppp.org.pk/2020/05/06/chairman-ppp-chaired-meeting-with-doctors-nurses-and-paramedics-from-punjab/