Thursday, January 16, 2020

Pakistan continues subjugation of minorities, Multan Bar Association bars non-Muslim lawyers from contesting bar elections

The resolution presented by the lawyers of District Bar Association also stated that those willing to contest elections must also submit an affidavit to prove their faith in Islam.
In yet another attack on the religious minorities in Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Multan Bar Association has passed a resolution which prohibits non-Muslim lawyers including Ahmadis, sect of Islam whom Pakistan state has declared ‘non-Muslims’, from participating in the Bar Council elections. As per reports, the resolution presented by the lawyers of District Bar Association also stated that those willing to contest elections and vote must also submit an affidavit to prove their faith in Islam.
Such news from Pakistan comes at a time when Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan is giving tips to India on how to protect the minorities in India in the backdrop of passage of Citizenship Amendment Act which ironically looks at providing Indian citizenship to persecuted religious minorities in neighbouring Islamic countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Earlier this month, Muslim mob had surrounded Nankana Sahib Gurudwara in Pakistan, which is the holy site where Guru Nanak was born, and had pelted stones at the holy shrine while shouting that they won’t let Sikhs live in Pakistan. Shockingly, two days after the attack, Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, instead of condemning the attack on Sikhs in Pakistan, had blamed PM Modi and RSS on attacks on India.
https://www.opindia.com/2020/01/multan-bar-association-pakistan-non-muslim-lawyers/

#Pakistan - Banning books - manifestation of a culture that is afraid to face the truth

Zahid Hussain


BANNING and burning books is a manifestation of a culture that is afraid to face the truth. It is ignorance of the book’s message or the fear of the latter that is often the reason for someone trying to ban a book. We have a long history of suppressing dissenting views perceived as posing a threat to the prevailing order. Not only have books been banned, writers too have been persecuted. The space for reason and freedom of expression is further shrinking thanks to growing authoritarianism and rising bigotry in society.
The reported confiscation of copies of the Urdu translation of Mohammed Hanif’s book A Case of Exploding Mangoes and the recommendation by a Punjab Assembly panel to ban three seminal books on Islam are the latest examples of the growing intolerance towards critical thinking. The books include Lesley Hazleton’s The First Muslim and After the Prophet.
Where Exploding Mangoes is concerned, some personnel allegedly belonging to an intelligence agency were said to have raided the office of the publisher in Karachi and taken away copies of the translated book that came out last year. Interestingly, the original English edition of the book — a satirical take on Gen Ziaul Haq’s plane crash — was published in 2008, and the work has been internationally acclaimed.
It seems that certain elements have suddenly discovered something in the Urdu version that they feel threatens our ‘national security’. It says a lot about their lack of understanding of a literary work. The raid itself could, perhaps, be a plot for a new bestseller satire by the author. Apparently, the government has not banned the book, so who ordered the raid on the publisher?

Confident societies face criticism rather than silence the messenger.

More insidious is the suggestion to ban the books authored by Lesley Hazleton, an American journalist and scholar. Both books have been impeccably researched. “The First Muslim illuminates not only an immensely significant figure but his lastingly relevant legacy.”
I have read the two books by Hazleton and found them to be extremely instructive, more than any other work on the subject. The books have been a bestseller in this country for more than a decade, and suddenly some unscrupulous lawmakers want these books to be banned just because of their own narrow-mindedness and prejudices.
Rising bigotry has been the main reason for the decline of sound scholarship regarding religious matters in this country. Some genuine scholars like Javed Ghamdi have had to leave the country because of the threat to their lives. Many enlightened clerics have been killed by extremists, with the result that the interpretation of religion is left to semi-educated mullahs. It will be a tragedy if these books are banned in this country. One hopes that the government has the sense to ignore such mindless recommendations.
How paranoid certain sections of our establishment have become with any critical narration of this country’s history is apparent in their reaction to a recently published book, The Battle for Pakistan: The Bitter US Friendship and a Tough Neighbourhood. It is a remarkable work by Shuja Nawaz, an acclaimed writer on Pakistan’s military. Although the book is not banned, its launch in Pakistan was blocked allegedly by certain quarters said to be unhappy with the objective study of the rocky relationship between the Pakistani military and the US in the past decade.
But the reality is that this is a well-researched book and the arguments are substantiated by facts and based on interviews with senior Pakistani and US military officials directly involved in policymaking during that period. Nawaz previously wrote an authoritative history of the Pakistani military: Crossed Swords: Pakistan, its Army and the Wars Within.
Despite the attempt to block the launch, the book has already drawn a large number of readers. Instead of learning from their mistakes and accepting the reality, the powers that be are attempting to restrict the freedom of views. It is such a narrow-minded approach that turns a country into an intellectual desert.
Lies and deception have often been used to cover up blunders, conspiracies, and military misadventures spanning Pakistan’s seven-decade history. Over the years, great pains have been taken to hide facts from the nation, even if these are generally known. Failure is celebrated as victory. This situation has led to a widening trust deficit between the public and the authorities.
Unsurprisingly, the people tend to believe foreign publications on the issue, however unrealistic they may be. So sensitive have the concerned authorities become that even a public debate on such issues is seen as breaching national security. As a result, we can never learn from our mistakes and wrongdoings. It’s all in the name of ‘national security’ — a handy term when it comes to suppressing saner voices. Such strong-arm actions are actually a sign of weakness. Confident societies face criticism rather than silence the messenger. People want to live in a society where they enjoy freedom of thought and action and can freely exercise their right to speak. Liberal democracies thrive on the freedom of expression. Unfortunately, the past few years have seen an attempt to roll back democratic values.Freedom of expression is the principal target of authoritarianism. In fact, one of its symptoms is the creeping expansion of ‘deep state’ power. The raid on the office of a publication house in Karachi and the attempt to stop the launch of an important book on Pakistan-US relations is a grim reminder of a country adrift.
Equally alarming is the rise of bigotry in society and the growing confluence of religious extremism and politics. The call by some lawmakers for banning seminal works on Islam is troubling. The strengthening of right-wing religious extremism threatens not only to weaken democratic institutions but also to divide the country.
Repression, achieved either through direct censorship or other forms of pressure, will turn the country away from the path of progress and enlightenment. The weakening of democratic institutions gives non-government forces greater opportunity to get involved in manipulating politics as they attempt to thwart fundamental rights. More worrisome is that all this is happening under a democratically elected government.

‘Twitter General’ Asif Ghafoor is no longer #Pakistan military’s spokesperson

 


Asif Ghafoor has been sent to Infantry Division. Major Gen. Babar Iftikhar will be new director general of Inter-Services Public Relations, Pakistan military’s publicity wing.

Pakistan’s chief propaganda officer Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor, the Director General of the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) who is equally loved and hated by people in the subcontinent, has been replaced by Maj Gen Babar Iftikhar.
ISPR is the Pakistan military’s publicity wing. 
Ghafoor has now been posted as the general officer commanding (GOC) of the Pakistan Army’s 40th Infantry Division based out of Okara in Punjab province.
“Alhamdulillah. Thanks to everyone I have remained associated with during the tenure. My very special thanks to Media all across. Can’t thank enough fellow Pakistanis for their love and support. Best wishes to new DG ISPR for his success,” Ghafoor tweeted from the ISPR director-general’s official handle.
Alhamdulillah.
Thanks to everyone I have remained associated with during the tenure. My very special thanks to Media all across. Can’t thank enough fellow Pakistanis for their love and support.
Best wishes to new DG ISPR for his success.

16.4K people are talking about this
Ghafoor also tweeted from his personal account, expressing gratitude to the people of Pakistan for their love and support during his tenure.
Thanks for your love & support. Stay strong, continue doing your bit for Pakistan.Stay blessed
آپکی محبت اورحمایت کاشکریہ۔ مضبوط رہتے ہوۓ پاکستان کے لئے اپنا کام جاری رکھیں۔ Stay blessed.

17.4K people are talking about this
Major General Iftikhar was the former GOC 1 at Armoured Division.
Known for Twitter gaffes
The news of Ghafoor’s removal comes as Pakistan Army Chief General Qamar Javed met Prime Minister Imran Khan Thursday.
Contrary to popular belief that Ghafoor has been removed because of his late-night tweets, his exit as the ISPR DG was expected as he had completed his tenure. Ghafoor is also due for promotion and he is one of the youngest major generals in the Pakistan Army.
Ghafoor, who became the ISPR chief in December 2016, was commissioned into the Pakistan Army in 1988 and holds a Master’s degree in strategic studies.
Called the Twitter General on social media, Ghafoor is known for deleting his tweets and getting trolled for his gaffes.
How he gave Balakot strikes a twist
Military sources in India said while Ghafoor or ‘Ghafoora’, as he is known on social media, did embarrass the Pakistan Army with his allegedly drunk tweets, he did prove to be a big asset.
Aditya Raj Kaul ✔ @AdityaRajKaul Ghafoor deleted his tweet but in real sense meant that Pakistan Army had already butchered Pashtun, Baloch, Ahmediyas and even Kashmiris over years successfully. Drunk tweet at midnight for his paid trolls to get moving. Deleted after he woke up at noon and thought of Parmosan. View image on Twitter 2,330 5:54 AM - Jan 13, 2020 Twitter Ads info and privacy 839 people are talking about this
One of his biggest achievements is the fact that ISPR was able to create doubts about the February 2019 Balakot airstrikes even before India woke up to its information warfare.Exactly 87 minutes after India struck Balakot, the ISPR broke the news on Twitter, albeit with a twist.Ghafoor tweeted at 0512 hours on 26 February 2019: “Indian Air Force violated Line of Control. Pakistan Air Force immediately scrambled. Indian aircrafts gone back. Details to follow.”
DG ISPR ✔ @OfficialDGISPR Indian Air Force violated Line of Control. Pakistan Air Force immediately scrambled. Indian aircrafts gone back. Details to follow. 43.2K 6:42 PM - Feb 25, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy 17.8K people are talking about this
By the time India issued a formal press statement through Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale just before noon, social media was already abuzz with many Pakistani handles tweeting pictures and information about the attack to showcase that the strike was a failure.
Such was the power of the Pakistani propaganda that the Indian military was left giving clarification even when it was one of the most daring attacks carried out by it after Operation Meghdoot, which led to the capture of the Siachen glacier.
https://theprint.in/defence/twitter-general-asif-ghafoor-is-no-longer-pakistan-militarys-spokesperson/350623/

U.S. indicts 5 men suspected of aiding #Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program

Five men are accused of conspiring to smuggle aircraft parts, electronic components and other technical equipment from the U.S. to Pakistan to support that country’s nuclear program, according to an indictment unsealed Wednesday in federal court in New Hampshire.
The men were indicted by a federal grand jury in October. The document said that, between September 2014 and October 2019, the group operated an international network of front companies that existed to acquire goods for a Pakistani group called the Advanced Engineering Research Organization and the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission.
The goods were exported from the United States without export licenses, in violation of federal law, the indictment said. Both organizations were on a Commerce Department list that imposes export license requirements for groups whose activities are found to be contrary to U.S. security or foreign policy interests.
The men are accused of attempting to conceal the true destinations in Pakistan of the goods by using the front companies as the supposed purchasers and end-users of them, and as the apparent source of payments. Several were listed as being in New Hampshire.
The defendants live in Pakistan, Canada, Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom. It wasn’t immediately known if they had lawyers.

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Video - Trevor Noah - Nancy Pelosi’s Impeachment Procession and Lev Parnas’s Paper Trail | The Daily Show

Video Report - Why the French are drinking less

Video Report - #Russia PM's government resigns

Video Report - #Russian government resigns

#DemDebate #LateShowLIVE Sanders, Warren Clash Over "Woman President" Question At Iowa Debate: Colbert's LIVE Monologue

Video Report - Elizabeth Warren fires back at Bernie Sanders' denial about women candidates

Video Report - Key moments from the Iowa #Democratic debate

Video - The Remedy: Democratic Debate - Winner Revealed

Video - Rep. Adam Schiff: We feel the weight of history with impeachment

Video - Pelosi signs impeachment articles against President Trump

Video - Bilawal Bhutto New Video #Madina_Sharif

Unprogressive mindsets of the masses and intolerance for social diversity: a development challenge for Pakistan

By Fatima Khalid
Just as Pakistan’s economy is grappling with limited natural resources, the social structure is also struggling with the issue of intolerance. The core issue is the lack of meaningful education leading to a lack of tolerance resulting in extremism in every sphere of life. Pakistan’s population is highly driven by religion, also being an extremely patriarchal society, the true value of religion has been lost in the cultural norms and the teachings of religion have been manipulated.
Pakistan is a country rich in diversity, it is home to people from different religions. Yet, it is dominated by Islamic extremists, who fail to accept that every person has equal rights, regardless of gender, color, creed, caste, religion, and ethnicity. The people of Pakistan are divided in the name of provinces, religion and status quo as well. They have strong ethnic attachments and are intolerable towards diversity of culture. According to Max Weber’s Modernization Theory, every country needs to go through a process of modernization in order to achieve development. Pakistani society is highly critical of the modernization process which it believes interferes with the country’s traditions and cultural practices. The critics of modernization theory may be right in their own context but it will not be wrong to say that the unprogressive attitude of the Pakistani society is the greatest hindrance to the process of development in the country. There is a clear-cut division of liberals and extremists in the country. This duality in the society hampers all sorts of growth processes; economic and social. The characteristics of the society decide the future of the State. An important question that arises here is that, where do culture appreciation stop and culture appropriation begin?

The feeling of a nation needs to be engraved in the individuals, and openness of culture should be embraced as a norm of life because nothing can remain constant, every living thing needs to go through the process of change

Where the world is said to be in a transition phase, moving towards a post-modern society, Pakistan is still questioning the pros and cons of modernization and development. In this new millennium, creating the capacity to deal effectively with this development challenge and other conditions associated with the dual processes of under and over development stands as one of the greatest challenges for those who profess a commitment to modernism’s promise of ‘progress’ with respect to improving human well-being. The first and foremost step is to enlarge the thinking capacity of the population, which can only be possibly done by the right kind of education. This is the failure of the state and its institutions that have failed to tackle the problem of unprogressive mind sets of the masses by providing quality education and creating enough jobs to utilize the youth in order to make them productive and keep them away from extremist ideologies and activities.
Pakistan needs to go through the social change process for development in its true essence. Most importantly, the society needs to open itself towards change, and give up the cultural norms which keep the society backward, restricted and restrained. We are living in the era of globalization, where anything in one country effects millions in the other country, state boundaries have been blurred in this neoliberal system. Freedom is everything, most superior of which is the freedom of thought and choice. Our society needs to treat men and women as equals and stop curbing women by making them economically self-sufficient, this not only is beneficial at the micro level for the household but equally beneficial at the macro level for the country as a whole.
The country faces an unequal distribution of wealth, which is another cause of growing intolerance among the masses. The problems that Pakistan is confronted with arise from fundamental socioeconomic and class inequalities which have allowed the ruling classes to espouse, promote and encourage orthodox, rigid and fundamentalist versions of religion, as opposed to the more tolerant, peaceful ones that the dispossessed classes reflect.The local bodies system from Article 140 of the constitution states that power should be transferred to the lower levels of government. When this transition finally occurs, it will improve the condition of the public as well. So, it is extremely important that the government provides mechanisms for indulging the youth bulge as well as the structurally unemployed into the employment cycle.
The time has come to support the long overdue goal of a ‘Naya Pakistan’ in which people from all walks of life can play a dynamic and meaningful role in national life. Naya Pakistan needs new, reformed, modern, progressive approach and mentality of the majority of the population, which is open towards development and social change. A serious revamping of socio-economic structures of the country is required. Policies that are comprehensive and well-planned as well as sustainable and have long term objectives are seriously needed in this time without any doubt. Quality education plays the most important role in creating tolerance and acceptance for diversity. There is need for changes in the educational system, it should be made uniform across the board and teachings of peace and acceptance for heterogeneity of population should be promoted through education. By meaningful education Pakistanis can rethink their identity and look at themselves as “Pakistanis”, instead of being divided in the name of religion or region. The feeling of a nation needs to be engraved in the individuals, and openness of culture should be embraced as a norm of life because nothing can remain constant, every living thing needs to go through the process of change.
Education, without doubt will play the most important role in reconstructing the social structures. But there are other factors which cause intolerance in the society mainly because of income disparity which need to be tackled with institutional changes.
https://dailytimes.com.pk/539995/unprogressive-mindsets-of-the-masses-and-intolerance-for-social-diversity/

What can #Pakistan learn from #Bangladesh?

By Dr Syed Akhter
Henry Kissinger, the secretary of state during the Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford administrations, ominously dubbed Bangladesh a basket case, and the moniker stuck, causing disappointment and dismay among Bangladeshis. In the 1970s, the derogatory appellation painted a dire picture of a country struggling with negative growth rates, dismal export potentials, empty coffers, and, to top it all off, the burden of meeting the needs of a population traumatized by a brutal independence movement. The future of Bangladesh, at the time, looked very bleak indeed.
Five decades later, Bangladesh has come out roaring. It has become one of the leading Asian economies and has, for over a decade, grown at a good clip. In fact, since 2011, Bangladesh’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate has been consistently over 6 %. In its latest report, the Asian Development Bank paints a promising picture of Bangladesh and puts it on a sure footing for achieving a growth rate of 8% in 2020, the highest in the region.
Due to the constant economic upheaval, the Bangladeshi economy will cast off the status of a least developed economy in less than five years and will join the list of developing economies. Bangladesh’s story of economic success is strewn with lessons on how to exploit resource endowments, not only to achieve economic growth, but also inculcate human development. That is why Bangladesh is higher on the human development index (HDI) than Pakistan.
It is somewhat ironic that it was Mahbubul Haq, a Pakistani economist, that developed the HDI along with Amartya Sen to assess the quality of life and standard of living of people within a country. Sen, a Nobel Laureate, called Haq an “outstanding economist and a visionary social thinker.” Haq believed that the policy outcomes that mattered the most were what a government did for its people so that they could lead a healthy and prosperous life. Taking a people-centric approach to judge the success of governmental policies, the HDI draws attention to three dimensions of people’s lives: education, health, and income.
During the last two decades, Bangladesh has made great strides with regards to improving the lives of its people. To get a sense of where it stands today, we will compare Bangladesh with Pakistan on some of the key indicators of HDI, knowing full well that such a comparison can generate controversy due to the long standing friction between the two countries.
When we look at the ranking of the two countries on the human development scale, Bangladesh is ahead on the 135th position as opposed to Pakistan’s 152nd. The average life expectancy in Bangladesh is also higher at 72.3 years in comparison to Pakistan’s 67.1 years whereas the mortality rate is also significantly lower in Bangladesh at 26.9 versus 61.2 in Pakistan. A child born in Bangladesh can expect to be in school longer than a child born in Pakistan at an average of 11.2 years versus 8.5 years while the mean years of schooling for females in Bangladesh is 5.3 years compared to 3.8 years in Pakistan. What is perhaps most surprising is that, according to the World Bank, Bangladesh now has a higher per capita Gross National Income than Pakistan, $1,750 versus $1,590 to be precise. Overall, Bangladeshis now enjoy a higher standard of living than their Pakistani counterparts.
Among the different developmental policies that Bangladesh implemented to improve the standard of living for its people, the two that stand out are the economic empowerment of women and the focus on infrastructural development. Comparatively, while both Pakistan and Bangladesh essentially exported their unemployment problems by sending people to work in the restrictive environment of the Middle East, Bangladesh also looked for ways to create employment opportunities internally for its labour force. It slowly and steadily expanded the textile sector to create employment opportunities, especially for women, who now form the backbone of the industry.
As a result, female labour now accounts for more than 90% of the workforce in the textile sector which currently employs over four million people. These jobs have not only improved the lives of families, but have also given women discretionary purchasing power and access to financial instruments.
Bangladesh has become a textile powerhouse, exporting apparel products and producing for retailers such as Zara, Gap, Uniqlo, Hugo Boss, H&M and other multinationals. A once fledgling industry has now been transformed into a $30 billion business which has established Bangladesh as the second largest exporter of garments and apparel products in the world after China. The experience and the network of relationships that its executives have developed along with the business prowess they have gained will be instrumental in moving Bangladesh towards the next phase of development which is the production and marketing of high value-added products. Unfortunately, in the case of Pakistan, the data on human development looks bleak. Its story is one of lost opportunities. Once a beacon of development and modernity in South Asia, Pakistan’s economy has stagnated due to rampant corruption and mismanagement. Successive governments have failed to construct a growth-conducive economic model whereas a feudal mentality has curtailed the entrepreneurial spirit that propelled growth during the early years of Pakistan’s existence in the financial, educational, healthcare, aviation, and transportation sectors. Therefore, sooner rather than later, Pakistan will need to create conducive conditions in order achieve what Mahbub ul Haq valued – a good life for the general populace.
https://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/92997/bangladesh-not-a-basket-case-anymore/

پاکستانی صارفین کرپشن سے نہیں مہنگائی سے پریشان، رپورٹ

مارکیٹ ریسرچ کی دنیا کی تیسری بڑی کمپنی IPSOS کی طرف سے جاری کیےجانے والے گلوبل کنزیومر کانفیڈنس انڈیکس کی تازہ ترین سروے رپورٹ میں پاکستان کے حوالے 
سے کئی اہم انکشافات سامنے آئے ہیں۔
اس انڈیکس کی تیاری کے لیے پاکستان میں کیے جانے والے ایک حالیہ سروے میں صارفین سے پوچھا گیا تھا کہ ان کے نزدیک سب سے زیادہ پریشان کن بات کیا ہے؟ اس سوال کے جواب میں سب سے زیادہ لوگوں کا کہنا تھا کہ وہ مہنگائی (29 فیصد) اور بے روز گاری (30 فیصد) کی وجہ سے پریشان ہیں، اس کے بعد زیادہ تر لوگوں نے ٹیکسوں کے بڑھتے ہوئے بوجھ (11 فیصد) کو اپنی پریشانی بتایا۔ پاکستانی صارفین کی دیگر پریشانیوں میں بڑھتی ہوئے غربت اور بجلی کے نرخوں میں ہونے والا اضافہ بھی ہیں۔
دلچسپ بات یہ ہے کہ ان سارے اعداد وشمار کے مقابلے میں صرف دو فیصد صارفین نے کرپشن، اقربا پروری اور رشوت ستانی جیسے امور کو اپنی سب سے بڑی پریشانی قرار دیا۔
Logo Consumer confidence survey in pakistan
گلوبل کنزیومر کانفیڈنس انڈیکس 2019 میں پاکستان دنیا کی ابھرتی ہوئی معیشتوں بھارت، ترکی، جنوبی امریکا، روس، چین، اور برازیل سمیت 27 ممالک سے پیچھے ہے۔
اپنے 17 ہزار ملازمین کے ساتھ دنیا کے 89 ممالک میں کام کرنے والی فرانسیسی کمپنی IPSOS نے دسمبر 2019ء میں پاکستان کے 120 سے زائد شہروں اور دیہاتوں میں 18 سال سے زائد عمر کے مرد و خواتین سے معلومات حاصل کی تھیں۔ اس سروے میں 2900 افراد سے مقامی معاشی حالات اور ملک کی مجموعی اقتصادی صورتحال، تحفظ روزگار، قوت خرید، بچت اور سرمایہ کاری کے امکانات کے بارے میں پاکستانی شہریوں کی رائے حاصل کی گئی تھی۔اسی سروے میں لوگوں سے انہی امور کے بارے میں مستقبل کی توقعات کے حوالے سے بھی سوالات کیے گئے تھے۔
سرمایہ کاری، بچت، معاشی حالات اور روزگار کے حوالے سے صارفین کی آرا سےتیار کیے جانے والے گلوبل کنزیومر کانفیڈنس انڈیکس 2019 میں پاکستان دنیا کی ابھرتی ہوئی معیشتوں بھارت، ترکی، جنوبی امریکا، روس، چین، اور برازیل سمیت 27 ممالک سے پیچھے ہے۔ سروے کے مطابق اگست 2019ء کے مقابلے میں دسمبر 2019ء میں ملک کے معاشی حالات میں زیادہ خرابی نوٹ کی گئی اور صارفین کا کہنا ہے کہ ایک سال پہلے وہ معاشی طور پر قدرے بہتر حالات میں تھے۔ تحفظ روزگار، قوت خرید، بچت اور سرمایہ کاری کے حوالے سے اس سروے میں پاکستان کی معاشی صورتحال میں پچھلے چھ ماہ کے دوران ابتری کو نوٹ کیا گیا ہے۔
IPSOS کی تازہ سروے رپورٹ میں سامنے آنے والے انکشافات نے حکومتی حلقوں کے ان دعووں کی نفی کر دی ہے کہ ملک کی معیشت کو پٹڑی پر ڈالا اور بہتر بنایا جا رہا ہے۔
ڈی ڈبلیو کے ساتھ خصوصی گفتگو میں IPSOS پاکستان کے منیجنگ ڈائریکٹر عبدالستار بابر کا کہنا تھا کہ اس مرتبہ گلوبل کنزیومر کانفیڈنس انڈیکس میں پاکستان کا نمبر 32.8 ہے جو کہ پچھلے سال سے بھی ایک درجہ کم ہے۔ اس انڈیکس کا عالمی طور پر اوسط نمبر 48.5 ہے۔ بھارت اس انڈیکس میں 61.1 پر جبکہ ترکی 33.7 نمبر پر ہے۔
Pakistan Kinderunterernährung
IPSOS کی تازہ سروے رپورٹ میں سامنے آنے والے انکشافات نے حکومتی حلقوں کے ان دعووں کی نفی کر دی ہے کہ ملک کی معیشت کو پٹڑی پر ڈالا اور بہتر بنایا جا رہا ہے۔
عبدالستار بابر کے مطابق گلوبل کنزیومر کانفیڈنس انڈیکس کی تازہ رپورٹ میں یہ بات سامنے آئی ہے کہ پچھلے سال کے مقابلے میں گھر، گاڑی یا روز مرہ کی اشیاہ خریدنے کے حوالے سے 90 فیصد پاکستانوں کے اعتماد میں کمی آئی ہے۔ اسی طرح اس سال تحفظ روزگار اور مستقبل کے لیے سرمایہ کاری یا بچت کرنے کے حوالے سے 80 فیصد پاکستانیوں کے اعتماد میں کمی نوٹ کی گئی ہے۔ اس سروے میں حصہ لینے والے افراد میں سے 40 فیصد لوگوں کا کہنا تھا کہ اس سال وہ یا ان کا کوئی جاننے والا معاشی صورتحال کی وجہ سے بے روزگار ہو گیا ہے۔ ان کے بقول ہر چار میں سے تین پاکستانی ملکی حالات کے حوالے سے عدم اطمینان کا شکار ہیں، جبکہ پانچ میں سے چار پاکستانیوں کا خیال ہے کہ ملکی معیشت کی حالت بری ہے۔
ڈی ڈبلیو سے گفتگو کرتے ہوئے اوکاڑہ یونیورسٹی کے وائس چانسلر ڈاکٹر ذکریا ذاکر کا کہنا تھا کہ ملک کی معاشی صورتحال کی ابتری کے اثرات سماج پر ضرور پڑتے ہیں: ''اگر اقتصادی صورتحال ٹھیک نہیں ہوگی تو معاشرے میں تناؤ اور بے چینی میں اضافہ ہوتا ہے اور جرائم بڑھ جاتے ہیں۔‘‘ ان کے بقول اس صورتحال کو سنجیدگی کے ساتھ دیکھنے کی ضرورت ہے۔

Pakistan again fails to raise Kashmir issue in UNSC, members say bilateral matter

India on Wednesday slammed Pakistan for again trying to raise the Kashmir issue in the UN Security Council where it failed yet again to find any support, with New Delhi asserting that Islamabad needs to focus on the hard tasks it has to address in order to ensure normal relations with India.

 India on Wednesday slammed Pakistan for again trying to raise the Kashmir issue in the UN Security Council where it failed yet again to find any support, with New Delhi asserting that Islamabad needs to focus on the hard tasks it has to address in order to ensure normal relations with India.
China, Pakistan's 'all-weather ally', stood alone in the Pakistani corner to get the Security Council to focus on the Kashmir issue.
The attempt failed as other member countries felt Kashmir is a bilateral matter between India and Pakistan.
Earlier on Wednesday, China made the fresh pitch to raise the Kashmir issue under "other matters" during closed consultations in the Security Council Consultations Room.
India's Permanent Representative to the UN Ambassador Syed Akbaruddin said: "We once again saw an effort made by one member state of the UN, fail in plain view of all others".
"We are happy that neither alarmist scenario painted by the representatives of Pakistan nor any of the baseless allegations made repeatedly by representatives of Pakistan in the UN fora were found to be credible today," Akbaruddin told PTI.
"We are glad that the effort was viewed as a distraction and it was pointed by many friends that bilateral mechanisms are available to raise and address issues that Pakistan may have in its ties with India," he said.
A European source, heading into the Security Council meeting, had described the discussions on Kashmir during the closed consultations to be "low key."
A top European diplomat said the issue should be resolved bilaterally and it was a "domestic affair."
Akbaruddin further said that "Pakistan's practice of using false pretences to distract from addressing the malaise that afflicts it has run its course. We hope that Pakistan pays heed to the clear signals sent out here today and focusses on the hard tasks it has to address in order to ensure normal relations with India."
Coming out of the meeting, Chinese Ambassador Zhang Jun said: "We had a meeting on Jammu and Kashmir. And I'm sure you all know that Foreign Minister of Pakistan wrote letters to the Security Council asking the Security Council to pay attention to the current situation in Jammu and Kashmir.
"The issue of India and Pakistan has always been on the agenda of the Security Council and today we have also seen some tensions, so the Security Council had a briefing and heard at the briefing from the Secretariat concerning the current situation on the ground. Members exchanged views on that".
Zhang later said China "has stated our position very clearly. We remain concern about the situation on the ground (in Kashmir)."
When asked if the meeting advanced anything, he said: " I am sure the meeting will be helping both parties to understand the risk of further escalation and will encourage them to approach to each other and to have dialogue and to seek means, to seek solutions through dialogue. I think that will be helpful".
The current move by China was the third such attempt since August when the special status granted to Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution was scrapped by the government, and the state was bifurcated into two union territories.
In August, China pushed for a UNSC meeting on Kashmir after the government scrapped J-K's special status. However, the meeting did not yield the desired results for China as the member-states maintained that India's move was an internal issue.
Last month, France, the US, the UK and Russia foiled an attempt by China to discuss Kashmir at a closed-door meeting of the UNSC.
China has been critical of India's reorganisation of J-K and has particularly criticised New Delhi for making Ladakh a union territory. China lays claim over several parts of Ladakh.
India's decisions on Kashmir had also cast a shadow over Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to India in October for the second informal summit with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Notwithstanding the acrimony over the issue between the two countries, Modi and Xi held "successful" talks in the ancient coastal town of Mamallapuram, signalling a recalibration of bilateral ties.

Tuesday, January 14, 2020

Video - #PPP - Dila Teer Bijan

#PPP - Ab Waqt Ki Zaban Hai BILAWAL

Video - بلاول بھٹو عمرہ کرتے ہو #مدینہ_منور

Pakistan’s Lost Hope of Civilian Supremacy


By Daud Khattak

When Pakistan’s opposition joined forces with the government to extend General Bajwa’s term as army chief, it was a blow to pro-democracy activists.
When ex-premier Nawaz Sharif embarked on a road trip to his hometown Lahore soon after his sacking due to a controversial court case in November 2017, his goal was to stoke public sentiments in support of civilian supremacy.
Sharif’s party blamed the proverbial “hidden hand,” a euphemism referring to Pakistan’s intelligence agencies and the country’s military establishment, for his fall.
Within days, Sharif’s narrative of “Vote Ko Ezzat Do” or “respect the vote” was resounding in Pakistan’s mainland Punjab, the ex-premier’s main support base, raising the hope that the powerful military establishment could ultimately be challenged over its meddling in politics.
But Pakistan witnessed the deathblow to the nascent resistance movement spearheaded by Sharif and his charismatic daughter Maryam when his party voted in favor of legislation earlier this month extending the service term of Pakistan Army Chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa for another three years.
In Pakistan, two mainstream political parties – Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N) and the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) of former President Asif Ali Zardari, the widower of Pakistan’s first-ever woman prime minister, Benazir Bhutto – have, among others, rendered sacrifices and struggled for the cause of democracy and civilian supremacy in Pakistan. But to the dismay of many, these two parties also helped keep in power the very general whom they accuse, albeit privately, of orchestrating what they call one of the country’s most-rigged elections in July 2018.
Significance of Bajwa’s Extension
Bajwa is not the first, and will not be the last, army chief whose service term was extended upon retirement. Several ruling army chiefs have extended their service period or had it extended by the civilian authorities in the past. Similarly, Imran Khan is not the first Pakistani prime minister who extended the army chief’s term of service.
However, the circumstances in which Bajwa sought his extension are different this time in several respects.
First, in 2016, then-Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif refused to extend the service period of then-Army Chief General Raheel Sharif, whose predecessor General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani’s service term had been extended by the previous government.
Second, the peaceful and somewhat uninterrupted transfer of power from one civilian government to another twice in a row had created and strengthened the impression of political maturity and civilian authority.
Third, and most importantly, the Supreme Court of Pakistan struck down Khan’s decision extending Bajwa service term and ordered proper legislation in the parliament before his reappointment or extension of service period. The Supreme Court questioned the legality of the prime minister’s prerogative of extending the army chief’s service period for three years or re-hiring him upon retirement.
Bajwa had become the most controversial army chief in Pakistan’s recent history due to the accusations of “large-scale” rigging in the July 2018 parliamentary elections that allegedly favored Imran Khan’s Justice Movement. Pakistan’s social media played a role in raising questions about the service extension of the army chief.
Raised Stakes and Dashed Hopes
On January 7, Pakistan’s lower house of parliament overwhelmingly voted in favor of a bill providing legal grounds to extending the service tenure of General Bajwa. This rare show of unity by the parliamentarians in an otherwise divided National Assembly — 315 of the 342 members voted in favor of the bill — was unprecedented in the past 18 months.
The unity, however, buried the hope of civilian supremacy for the foreseeable future as both the government and opposition favored the controversial extension only to stay on the right side of the military establishment.
Besides frequent meddling in political affairs from behind the scenes, Pakistan’s military has directly ruled the country for over half of its 70-year history. With each move to arm-twist the civilians or directly take over since 1958, the generals have found pliant politicians to endorse their undemocratic steps with rubberstamp cabinets and parliament.
The PML-N and PPP, the two mainstream parties, alternatively ruled Pakistan for most of the country’s democratic history and have a record of clashing with the military for civilian supremacy. The duo are believed to be sitting in the opposition mainly because they had lost favor with the generals. Their support for Bajwa’s extension is believed to be a bid to avoid further confrontation with the military and regain the generals’ trust.
Notwithstanding serious reservations by both ideologues inside the two parties and pro-democracy activists on social media about the military’s political role, the so-called pragmatists prevailed to accede to Bajwa’s extension with the hope of endearing themselves to the military.
This unpopular but calculated move may or may not put the two mainstream parties back in the establishment’s good books to replace the ruling Tehreek-e-Insaaf, the party being seen as the military’s B-team. But the concession by the PML-N and PPP has definitely put an end to Nawaz Sharif’s “Vote Ko Ezzat Do” narrative.
This new arrangement will further strengthen the army’s grip on power as both the government and opposition have now entered the race to court favor with the military establishment instead of claiming their constitutional authority.
The step has also discouraged the ideologues in the mainstream political parties as well as the political workers and pro-democracy activists who firmly stood behind a bid to reclaim civilian authority with the symbolic move of not prolonging the army chief’s tenure.
However, the rare opportunity provided by Pakistan’s top court in its November 28, 2019 verdict was lost. And with that, many pro-democracy activists also lost hope in the political leadership.

#Pakistan: Crackdown on Expression Grows

Pakistan’s government intensified its clampdown on the media, political opposition, and nongovernmental organizations in 2019, Human Rights Watch said today in its World Report 2020.
Media outlets in Pakistan came under increased pressure from authorities for perceived criticism of the government. In some cases, regulatory agencies blocked cable operators from broadcasting networks that aired critical programs. GEO TV, a private television channel, was forced off the air or had its audience’s access restricted as punishment for editorials criticizing the government. On July 9, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) blocked three television news channels – Capital TV, 24 News HD, and Abbtakk News Network – after they broadcast speeches by opposition leaders. On July 1, PEMRA terminated a live interview with former President Asif Ali Zardari on GEO TV shortly after it began.
“Pakistan’s government is failing in one of the basic duties of a democratic government – providing an enabling environment for free expression and critical voices,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “Prime Minister Imran Khan’s government should focus on addressing longstanding human rights issues rather than muzzling those who bring attention to them.”
In the 652-page World Report 2020, its 30th edition, Human Rights Watch reviews human rights practices in nearly 100 countries. In his introductory essay, Executive Director Kenneth Roth says that the Chinese government, which depends on repression to stay in power, is carrying out the most intense attack on the global human rights system in decades. He finds that Beijing’s actions both encourage and gain support from autocratic populists around the globe, while Chinese authorities use their economic clout to deter criticism from other governments. It is urgent to resist this assault, which threatens decades of progress on human rights and our future.
Human Rights Watch received several credible reports of intimidation, harassment, and surveillance of various organizations and their staff by government officials. The government used the Regulation of INGOs (international nongovernmental organizations) in Pakistan policy to impede the registration and functioning of international humanitarian and human rights organizations.
The government also cracked down on members and supporters of political parties. Lawyers and rights groups expressed concerns of denial of due process and fair trial rights after several opposition leaders, including a former head of state and cabinet ministers, were arrested on corruption allegations.
In 2019, the Pakistani government failed to amend or repeal blasphemy law provisions that provide a pretext for violence against religious minorities, as well as arbitrary arrests and prosecution.
While numerous cases of violence against women and girls highlighted the difficulty survivors face getting justice, authorities succeeded in enforcing some key reforms. The Sindh provincial cabinet approved a new law in August providing the right of women agricultural workers to have a written contract, minimum wage, welfare benefits, and gender parity in wages. It was the first time that Pakistan recognized the right of women agricultural workers to unionize.
Pakistani law enforcement agencies were responsible for human rights violations including detention without charge and extrajudicial killings. Pakistan failed to enact a law criminalizing torture despite Pakistan’s obligation to do so under the Convention against Torture.
“Pakistani authorities should acknowledge diversity of opinion as a strength, not a weakness,” Adams said. “Instead of stifling dissent, the government needs to take urgent steps to hold its security forces accountable, repeal discriminatory laws, and demonstrate a genuine commitment to the rule of law.”