Saturday, March 2, 2019

#pulwamaattacks - Pakistan Didn’t Violate the Geneva Convention, It Confirmed Its Adherence to It


After suffering a humiliating military defeat on the morning of 27 February when Pakistan shot down two of its MiGs that violated the country’s airspace and even captured one of its pilots, India went wild trying to distract its population by switching the subject of discussion to allegations that Islamabad violated the Geneva Convention of 1949 by airing footage of the captured pilot, but in reality Pakistan actually confirmed its adherence to this cornerstone of international law and simultaneously contributed to de-escalating the worst military crisis with its nuclear-armed neighbor since their 1971 war almost half a century ago.
A Desperate Distraction To Cover Up A Military Defeat
“Pakistan Turned The Latest Bollywood ‘Surgical Strike’ Flick Into Reality” on the morning of 27 February after it upheld the rules-based international order centered on the UN Charter’s principles about territorial integrity, sovereignty, and the right to defend oneself against aggression when it shot down two Indian MiGs that violated its airspace and even captured one of the pilots. This came as a total shock for the Mainstream Media-indoctrinated Indian masses who had mostly been convinced up until that point that Prime Minister Modi had “succeeded” in “putting Pakistan in its place” after “surgically striking” it on the unsubstantiated pretext that Islamabad was involved in the Pulwama attack. As the clichéd saying goes, “the truth hurts”, and the proverbial “bloody nose” that Pakistan gave India risked exposing the latter’s government-driven narrative as nothing more than pre-election propaganda for the incumbent BJP, which is why the state swiftly moved to distract the population as soon as possible.
Instead of taking responsibility for bringing the two nuclear-armed neighbors closer to all-out hostilities since any time after their 1971 war almost half a century ago and accepting the peacemaking overturesthat Pakistani Prime Minister Khan maturely extended to his counterpart from a position of strength, Indian media obsessed over spinning video footage of their captured pilot as an alleged violation of the Geneva Convention of 1949. According to their weaponized narrative, Pakistan broke its commitment to this international pact by releasing footage of the captive, which Indian commentators claim was in contravention to Article 13’s clause specifically mandating that “prisoners of war must at all times be protected, particularly against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public curiosity.” While it’s debatable whether the pilot is actually a true “prisoner of war” or not, the Director General of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Public Relations confirmed that he’ll be “treated as per norms of military ethics”.
See It With Your Own Eyes
The problem, Indian pundits say, is that the footage of the captured pilot being saved from a local mob by the military, shown safely in custody, and then happily drinking tea supposedly made him a so-called “public curiosity” and is “proof” that Pakistan violated the Geneva Convention. Nothing could be further from the truth, however, since those three videos actually showed that the captured pilot is being treated in full accordance with the Geneva Convention and therefore contributed to de-escalating tensions with India. The Pakistani Armed Forces literally saved his life by rescuing him from a local mob, showing the world their principled commitment to international law that they were willing to also risk their own lives and potentially – if the situation came to do – also use non-lethal force or worse against their own enraged countrymen to ensure the safety of the Indian pilot. That says a lot about Pakistan’s military professionalism and was a proud moment for the country.
The second video showing the captured pilot standing while in custody was evidently meant to reassure the world that the prisoner was successfully brought to a safe space where he was no longer at risk of harm. This was important to signal because Pakistan preemptively thwarted a dangerous infowar escalation from the Indian side by doing this and confirming that the pilot was not only still alive, but in good enough of a condition to stand and say a few words. It’s very likely that had that video not come out as soon as it did, India – which “has more fake news than anywhere else in the world”, as confirmed by a recently released independent report by Microsoft – might have started disseminating fake news and possibly even edited video clips claiming to “prove” that he was “killed” and his body “mutilated” in order to “justify” forthcoming military moves that would have unquestionably escalated the situation.
It’s possibly because of how well he knows his countrymen’s mindset that the Indian pilot voluntarily chose to go on video and send an important peacemaking message to them and the rest of the world, all while calmly sipping tea that his Pakistani captors generously gave him. He said that “I would like to put this on record, and I will not change my statement if I go back to my country also. The officers of the Pakistani Army have looked after me very well. They are thorough gentlemen, starting from the captain who rescued me from the mob, and from the soldiers, and thereafter the officers of the unit which I was taken. This is what I would expect my army to behave as, and I’m very impressed by the Pakistani Army.” Had one expected this footage to be aired far and wide by Indian media, they’d be mistaken, since it’s actually being censored by the state.
State Censorship In The Self-Professed “World’s Largest Democracy”
“The Economic Times” reported that Indian security officials “said on Wednesday that the videos of the captured Indian Air Force pilot were being released on the internet as part of a psychological operation against India and netizens should desist from sharing them on social media”, adding that “It is aimed to demoralise the forces and people.” Because of this, media outlets have refused to share those three videos with their audiences, intending instead to continue fanning the flames of war as part of Modi’s re-election campaign by alleging that the captured pilot is being “mistreated” and that the Indian Armed Forces must promptly take revenge. As most state-driven policies of censorship have a tendency for doing, however, this is backfiring on India because all international media outlets of prominence have reported on that footage and it’s since gone viral on social media, so regular Indians can see that their government’s narrative about Pakistan’s ”mistreatment” of their pilot is false.
It’s precisely because the pilot praised the Pakistani Army and proved that his captors even risked their lives in order to save his own that India imposed a strict policy of censorship in a frantic bid to prevent its warmongering rhetoric from falling apart at the seams, hence the latest fake news narrative that Pakistan supposedly violated the Geneva Convention by releasing footage of the prisoner. New Delhi suffered such a humiliating military defeat on 27 February that it will do anything to distract its people from what happened and desperately try to gin up international support against Pakistan on the alleged basis that Islamabad brazenly violated international law despite the Pakistani state actually upholding the UN Charter by protecting its sovereign airspace from aggressive foreign intrusion. As for the weaponized infowar narrative that Pakistan “paraded” him around as a “public curiosity”, the videos actually prove that the country wanted to pre-emptively counter India’s expected fake news campaign about the pilot’s treatment and fate.
Concluding Thoughts
Yet another Indian infowar narrative is falling apart after the facts once again reveal that the country is pumping out fake news in order to discredit Pakistan and “justify” military aggression against it in support of Modi’s re-election campaign. Not only has no single shred of evidence been publicly presented proving that the Pakistani state was involved in the Pulwama attack nor has anything emerged to confirm India’s incredulous claims that its “surgical strike” killed 200-300 Jaish-e-Mohammed fighters, but the facts actually confirm the opposite, namely that Pakistan had nothing to do with Pulwama and that India’s highly publicized “strike” wasn’t even what it was portrayed as being and certainly didn’t kill a single soul. Likewise, India’s assertion that Pakistan violated the Geneva Convention is also disproven by the video evidence that its neighbor presented but which has been censored from Indian media on “national security” grounds, all in order to keep a “politically convenient” fake news narrative alive ahead of the country’s heated elections.

Did Pakistan use its Chinese JF-17 jets to shoot down Indian planes?

By Liu Zhen
Beijing has refused to confirm a former Pakistani air force officer’s claim that China-made JF-17 fighters were used by the Pakistan Air Force to shoot down Indian military aircraft.Less than two hours after the claim was made on Wednesday morning, the share price of the state-owned plane maker’s sister company rose in trading in Shenzhen.
The Chinese defence ministry did not respond on Thursday when asked whether JF-17s were involved in the Pakistan-India clashes.
Instead, ministry spokesman Ren Guoqiang said: “The most urgent and important thing is both India and Pakistan should keep restraint.” The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) had said on Wednesday that it shot down two Indian fighter jets that entered Pakistani airspace near the Kashmir Line of Control, and captured a pilot. India said that its air force lost only one MiG-21 Bison and pilot while shooting down a Pakistani F-16. The Pakistani military denied any involvement of the American-made F-16s in the engagement, making it more likely JF-17 jets were deployed – a theory bolstered by a tweet by a retired PAF officer.
“Proud to announce, I was project director for JF-17 Thunder programme jointly produced by Pakistan and China during the [2001-2008] tenure of general Pervez Musharraf,” retired PAF air marshall Shahid Latif tweeted early Wednesday morning.“Today, same jets targeted and shot down Indian jets which entered Pakistani airspace.”
When trading opened less than two hours later in China, shares in Shenzhen-listed Sichuan Chengfei Integration Technology (CAC-SCIT), a sister company of JF-17 maker Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC), rose 10 per cent in five minutes – hitting the maximum daily rise allowed on the Chinese stock market.
Shares in CAC-SCIT, which makes car parts, rose a further 10 per cent on Thursday. CAC is not publicly listed.CAC-SCIT shares had dropped back 5.57 per cent by midday on Friday.If confirmed, the Pakistani operation would represent the first success by JF-17s in real air combat. The lightweight, single-engine, multi-role combat aircraft JF-17 was developed by CAC and is produced jointly with defence and aviation contractor Pakistan Aeronautical Complex. The PAF has about 110 JF-17s.The Nigerian and Myanmese air forces also use JF-17s, which they bought from Pakistan.China has called on both sides to maintain communication and dialogue, “manage the situation and together safeguard peace and stability in this region”, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said on Wednesday.

Crisis may be easing, but nuclear threat still hangs over India and Pakistan



Tensions on the border between India and Pakistan last week pushed the two nuclear-powered South Asian adversaries closer to conflict than at any point in the past two decades.
While the situation has calmed -- Pakistan on Friday released an Indian air force pilot it captured after shooting his pane down -- drastic swings in relations are the norm. Both countries know the risks when tensions spike.
Following their separation in 1947, relations between India and Pakistan have been in a near constant state of agitation. The two sides have fought several major wars -- the last being in 1999 -- involving thousands of casualties and numerous skirmishes across the Line of Control in the contested Kashmir region.
Since that last clash, both countries have quietly sought to enlarge and upgrade their military capabilities.
    Indian M777 howitzers are displayed during a rehearsal for the Republic Day Parade on January 23, 2019, in New Delhi, India. The guns are top-line US technology, analysts say.
    With its military buildup over those decades, India now exceeds Pakistan on most numerical measurements -- fighter jets, troops, tanks and helicopters.
    India far surpasses Pakistan in other measures, too, especially in military budget, $64 billion to $11 billion, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
    But, as is often the case, numbers don't tell the whole story.

    The China question

    India has about 3 million military personnel compared to fewer than 1 million for Pakistan, according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, but New Delhi can't focus them all on its neighbor to the west.
    A chunk is focused on India's northeast and its border with China.
    "India's strategic problem is bringing its heft to bear. It has traditionally had to split its forces and leave some in the east to deter Chinese adventurism," said Peter Layton, a former Australian Air Force officer and now fellow at the Griffith Asia Institute.
    In 1962, India and China engaged in a bloody border war and skirmishes have continued to break out sporadically throughout the subsequent years, most recently in the Doklam area in 2017.
    And China is able to keep Indian attentions divided by keeping a close military relationship with Pakistan.
    "There is a convergence with Chinese and Pakistan strategic thinking that has continued for five decades now," said Nishank Motwani, a visiting fellow at the Asia-Pacific College of Diplomacy with expertise on India and Pakistan.
    China plays another role as Pakistan's biggest arms supplier -- with a whopping 40% of Beijing's military exports going to Islamabad, according to data from a December discussion of Pakistan at the Brookings Institution in Washington.

    India's ties to the West

    While Pakistan has formed a close relationship with China, India -- with a defense budget six times the size of Pakistan's -- has been on a rapid military modernization program of its own.
    "India has more spending power and has been investing in platforms that Pakistan can't afford," Motwani said.
    Among recent acquisitions are airborne early warning and control aircraft with Israeli technology and US airframes and US-made artillery it is deploying along the Kashmir line of control to replace 1980s' Swedish guns, said Motwani.
    India wants even more new military technology, but it is often hamstrung by tight export controls from key suppliers like the US and Britain.
    Other experts say India is also hurt by a poor domestic military industrial base.
    "India does not have an industry ecosystem. So you don't have the experience of design. You may have smart engineers, but that does not mean that they can design a combat jet," said Manoj Joshi, a fellow at the New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation.
    Pakistan, meanwhile, is making its own fighter jets, Chinese-designed JF-17s.
    A Pakistan JF-17 performs at a Paris airshow in 2015.
    According to some reports, It may have been one of those jets that on Wednesday downed an Indian Air Force fighter plane, leading to the capture by Pakistan of an Indian pilot.
    That Indian jet was a MiG-21. A Soviet-designed aircraft, it has been in service since the 1960s, and the Indian Air Force still says it "forms the backbone" of its fleet with about 200 in inventory.
    But Motwani says Indian pilots call the old jet "the flying coffin" for the accidents it has been involved in.
    An Indian Air Force MIG-21 performs at an airshow in February 2019.
    And that illustrates a problem for India. While it has a massive military budget, a significant chunk of that goes toward maintenance of existing equipment, and salaries.
    "Modernization gets a mere 14% (of allocated funds), which is grossly inadequate," according to an Indian Parliament committee inquiry on military readiness last year.

    The size disparity

    India, with a landmass nearly four times that of Pakistan, can put military assets well back from tense border regions, where any Pakistani strikes against them would encounter multiple layers of air defenses.
    In the smaller and more narrow Pakistan, military bases and assets are harder to shield.
    "Pakistan lacks strategic depth," Motwani said. "A lot of Pakistan bases are close to India which makes them easy targets for Indian forces."
    To carry out any attacks, India has the variety and number of aircraft -- fighters, ground-attack, tankers and AWACs -- that Pakistan just can't match.
    "Large raids would be hard to stop although some losses would be expected," Layton said.
    While the air advantage seems to lean India's way, large-scale ground actions across the border would be tougher for India.
    "Pakistan has a network of canals along the international border to make it harder for Indian formations to move into Pakistan," said Motwani. It's old school warfare, not far removed from the trenches of World War I.
    At sea, the advantage is clearly on the Indian side.
    Pakistan, with a much smaller coastline to defend, has put the lion's share of resources into its army and air force, Motwani said.
    New Delhi has an aircraft carrier and nuclear-powered submarines in its fleet, he said, assets Pakistan can't come close to matching.

    The nuclear threat

    One area where Indian and Pakistan are evenly matched is the area that raises the most worry whenever hostilities spike between the two -- nuclear weapons.
    Figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute last year show Pakistan with 140 to 150 nuclear warheads and India with 130 to 140.
    Layton worries that if the situation gets dire for Pakistan -- something that's far from what we're seeing at the moment -- they could be used before commanders in Islamabad could stop them.
    "Pakistan has a strategic policy of delegating nuclear release approval down to lower level tactical units," he said. "There is a real danger of 'loose nukes,' that is lower-level bellicose commanders using tactical nuclear weapons if they see fit."
    Motwani said Pakistan wants India to know that nuclear threat is always there.
    That leads back to how the current spike in hostilities began, when a Pakistan-based terror group struck an Indian military convoy in Indian-administered Kashmir on February 14, killing 40.
    "Pakistan can use terrorist groups. That's a military strategy it has used for decades as a way to bridge the military gap with India," Motwani said.
      And every time India contemplates retaliation, the nuclear threat is there.
      "It uses its nuclear weapon capability as a firewall that it uses to carry out terrorist strikes in India with impunity," he said.

      "Never Recognised India, Pakistan As Nuclear Countries," Says China

      "China has never recognised India and Pakistan as nuclear countries. Our position on this has never changed," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang told a media briefing in Beijing.
      China Friday said it has never recognised India and Pakistan as nuclear powers and ruled out extending such a status to North Korea following the unsuccessful second summit between US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Vietnam. "China has never recognised India and Pakistan as nuclear countries. Our position on this has never changed," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang told a media briefing in Beijing.
      He was replying to a question whether China would recognise North Korea as a nuclear state like India and Pakistan as talks between Trump and Kim at the second summit in Hanoi broke down over Pyongyang's refusal to give up two nuclear processing plants.
      China has been blocking India's entry into the 48-member Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) on the ground that New Delhi has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
      After India applied for NSG membership, Pakistan too applied for the same following that China has called for a two-step approach which states that NSG members first need to arrive at a set of principles for the admission of non-NPT states into the NSG and then move forward discussions of specific cases.
      https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/china-never-recognised-india-pakistan-as-nuclear-countries-2001316

      Comedy Video - Trevor Exposed India can't War with Pakistan

      Friday, March 1, 2019

      Music Video - Billo De Ghar - By Abrar Ul Haq

      Music Video - kuriyan lahore diyan

      Music Video - Chalo Koie Gal Nahe ( Afshan Zabi )

      Video Music - Lokan do do yaar banaye - Afshan Zebi

      Video Report - 🇵🇰 🇮🇳 #Pakistan hands over captured pilot #Abhinandan Varthaman to #India

      PAKISTAN UNDER PRESSURE FROM SAUDI ARABIA, UAE AND US TO RELEASE INDIAN PILOT: NDTV

      Indian NDTV website has asserted that the administration of United States, Saudi Kingdom and United Arab Emirates have put pressure on Pakistan government for immediate release of Indian pilot, captured after Pakistan shot down two Indian jets over violation of its airspace.
      Pakistanis are dismayed over the dirty role being played by two so-called Muslim countries Saudi Arabia and UAE together with US because none of them have condemned India over incursions and dropping payloads into Pakistani territory although violation of airspace itself is violation of international law. 

      Pakistan leadership has adopted a rational and logical stance that Pakistan doesn’t want war and all that happened was not revenge. It was India that is seeking to impose war on Pakistan. 

      Saudi Arabia had voted against Pakistan at the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) that placed Pakistan in grey list and since then Saudis and UAE Sheikhs are lined up behind US and India to punish Pakistani nation.

      http://www.shiitenews.org/index.php/pakistan/item/36759-pakistan-under-pressure-from-saudi-arabia-uae-and-us-to-release-indian-pilot-ndtv

      #India and #Pakistan Are Both Losing

      By Mihir Sharma
      One’s acting like a superpower before it is one, the other is letting extremists embroil it in misadventures. Neither is focused on what citizens really need.
      Every aspect of the current confrontation between India and Pakistan -- which, I fear, may not be over yet -- was avoidable. The initial attack on Indian paramilitary soldiers, in which 40 of them died, was claimed by Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed, a terrorist group which has been allowed to thrive by that country’s military establishment. The attack itself required sophisticated organization and hundreds of kilograms of explosives. Not preventing it was an Indian intelligence failure for which nobody has yet been held accountable.
      After the attack, some form of retaliation was always on the cards, but the Indian government made the particularly risky choice of ordering airstrikes on a target within Pakistan proper. Although it claimed the strikes were a failure, Pakistan nevertheless chose to retaliate in turn. When it did, its front-line fighters had to be engaged by Indian warplanes that included the MiG-21, which many Indian aviation experts worry is too outdated for such duties. In the process, an Indian pilot was shot down and taken prisoner. While the pilot is being sent home, we in South Asia now live in a region in which two nuclear-armed adversaries send planes to bomb each other’s territory. This is a profoundly disturbing turn of events.
      Pakistan is busy congratulating itself on how things have turned out so far. This is unwise and premature. Premature because there is no reason to suppose that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi -- who on Thursday called the airstrikes a “pilot project,” implying they would be scaled up in the future -- will be satisfied with anything other than the total rhetorical victory his camp followers in the Indian media have already promised voters. And it is unwise because the world’s reaction to the Indian airstrikes, unprecedented though they were, was notably unfriendly to Pakistan. Pakistani leaders -- or, more precisely, the generals in Rawalpindi that really run the country -- have few friends left. Even the People’s Republic of China urged only that “sovereignty should be respected” -- criticism, in its way, of both sides and not just India.
      Pakistan remains dependent on the world’s goodwill. Its economy survives from bailout to bailout. It needs to avoid alienating Beijing, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and the International Monetary Fund all at once. And yet Pakistan constantly gets itself into these uncomfortable situations, where it finds itself provoking a confrontation with India, in over its head, and needing to call on a reluctant international community to rein in its incensed neighbor. The last few times, the generals’ dangerous indulgence of jihadist militants has been the proximate cause. But, the pattern has repeated itself over and over again since Partition in 1947; something deeper is at work.
      Meanwhile, for India, the lessons are equally stark. Its finance minister crowed in a poorly-timed press conference on Wednesday, the same day an Indian pilot was shot down, that India could now strike into the heart of Pakistan the same way the U.S. had taken out Osama bin Laden. This is an almost laughable over-estimation of India’s capabilities at this point in its development. You have to be able not just to get in but to get out, and be powerful enough to be untouchable thereafter. India has diplomatic support at the moment. But that goodwill has been bought by decades of strategic restraint and could easily be blown up by badly-planned adventurism.
      India is a huge country. It is young and impatient. But, its leaders do the country a serious disservice by trying to pretend that it can behave like a superpower before it builds up the necessary economic and diplomatic muscle. Deng Xiaoping famously told his country to “secure our position” and “bide our time.” In this, as in much else, India’s leaders have something to learn from Deng. India is large enough and grows fast enough that, just over the past five years, its economy has added three Pakistans. In a decade or so, if it focuses on growth and development, it will be better equipped to deal with problems such as Jaish-e-Mohammed. The best revenge is living well, as they say.
      As for Pakistan, if it wishes to retain the autonomy of decision-making that is true sovereignty, it had better work on strengthening its economy. Too often it looks to saviors -- once the Americans, now MBS and Xi -- as if pumping money in from outside is a sustainable solution. Per capita income growth in Pakistan is less than half that in India; it has already been overtaken by Bangladesh, once its poor and despised eastern half. If only Pakistan focused on its economy, it would no doubt find it less and less necessary to seek self-respect though its military.
      As I said, every aspect of this current confrontation was avoidable. But, even more needless is South Asia’s desire to fritter away national energy in confrontation and saber-rattling when it is growth and productivity that need attention.

      EDITORIAL: #Pakistan should have attended #OIC moot

      The showdown between Islamabad and New Delhi, resulting from the Pulwama attack, was the most dangerous phase in Indo Pakistan relations since the 1999 Kargil War. The situation almost spiralled out of control when New Delhi tried to commit acts of aggression not once but twice earlier in the week.Diplomatic intervention from regional and global powers along with the commendable peaceful overtures by Prime Minister Imran Khan reduced the almost war-like situation to some extent. Islamabad has, perhaps, hastily decided to boycott and apparently send junior officials to the 46th session of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation’s(OIC) Council of Foreign Ministers’ (CFM) being currently held in Abu Dhabi.
      Former president Asif Ali Zardari and Chairman PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, amongst a number of parliamentarians, expressed valid concerns over the boycott since Pakistan may have lost a momentous opportunity to effectively convey its concerns and take other member countries of the organisation into confidence over the current diplomatic impasse and presence of the Indian delegation. While it’s true that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) invited the Indian Minister for External Affairs Sushma Swaraj as a ‘guest of honour’ for the inaugural session, Islamabad should have attended the remainder of the session since it was initially announced by Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi.
      However, the last-minute decision to boycott came after the UAE government couldn’t disinvite India.
      The OIC had played a significant role in the past when it came to the matter of Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IoK). Its resolutions were always in solidarity with the Kashmiri people and their right to self-determination was acknowledged on numerous occasions.
      During the inception of the organisation in Morocco during the year 1969, India was refused admission when the then Pakistani leadership and diplomats lodged a strong protest. Former Foreign Secretary Shamshad Ahmad Khan was present on the occasion and he played a pivotal role in this regard.
      The regional and global scenarios have changed since then. Could we call it a failure of our diplomacy? While it’s too early to pass such judgements, it is hoped that Islamabad would introspect its decision to boycott and continue to remain engaged with this important multilateral platform. Building bridges should be a top priority and if one wishes to make friends and reduce the number of enemies, tough decisions must be made. 

      #PAKISTAN - #Pulwama - Why were we in such a hurry to return the pilot?: Sherry Rehman

      Senators on Friday lauded the government’s decision to release Indian Air Force (IAF) Wing Commander Aninandan, who was arrested on Wednesday after his airplane was shot down by Pakistan, but warned that India should not construe Pakistan’s desire for peace as its weakness.
      The Senate discussed the situation that emerged after escalation of tensions between Pakistan and India in the wake of that Indian violation of Pakistan’s airspace on Tuesday.
      Taking part in the debate, the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Senator Sherry Rehman demanded that the house should be briefed on the terms and conditions on which the Indian pilot was released.
      “We agree to the government’s decision to return the captured pilot. However, the parliament should be told about the steps India is taking in return. The conditions on which the pilot is being returned must be told. It must be told why the decision to return the pilot was taken so soon.”
      She said Prime Minister (PM) Imran Khan was continuously trying to establish telephonic contact with his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi but there seemed to be no response from them. India should at least respond to the call of Pakistani PM, she added.
      PPP’s Raza Rabbani said everyone is on the same page regarding the current situation.

      We certainly should send any prisoner of war home, this is our moral duty. But whats the the big hurry? needs no covert decisions.
      428 people are talking about this

      “The United States wants to make India the policeman in the entire region. The Research & Analysis Wing is involved in terrorist activities in Pakistan and India is continuing with the anti-Pakistan propaganda,” he said adding that the propaganda about Pakistan supporting terrorists and providing them safe havens was an absolute lie.
      “The core issue between Pakistan and India is Kashmir but India is not ready to discuss the dispute. We need to stay united,” he added.
      Senator Rehman Malik said Indian PM Narendra Modi’s war was not for his state or his nation but only meant for winning elections. He said the PM gave a good gesture by announcing the return of the Indian pilot.
      “Imran Khan wrote a letter to PM Nardendra Modi, but in return they staged an attack at Balakot. Pulwama incident is a well-planned conspiracy of the Modi government. We need to review our foreign policy,” he said.
      Rehman Malik said Modi only reflected his mindset by not attending the call made by Imran Khan and Pakistan should respond to this by lodging a protest with the Indian High Commission. “Pakistani pilot Hassan Siddiqui should be given a prestigious award by the state,” he added.
      State Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Ali Muhammad Khan said the Pakistani pilot rendered a big service to the country.
      “The confidence of the nation is restored after the joint session. We need to face more challenges and we are ready for them,” he said.
      Senators Javed Abbasi, Azam Swati, Muhammad Akram, Mir Kabir, Kulsoom Pervin and others also participated in the discussion and warned India that Pakistan only decided to return their pilot as a goodwill gesture and its efforts for peace should not be mistaken as its weakness.

      Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjrani adjourned the session until

      Disease, hunger 'alarmingly high' in drought-hit #Pakistan: Red Cross


      One of the worst droughts in Pakistan’s history has triggered “alarmingly high” levels of malnutrition and disease in the hardest hit areas where people have been forced to drink salty or contaminated water, the Red Cross said on Friday.
      Women, especially those pregnant or breastfeeding, and children are particularly vulnerable to diarrhea, vomiting and fever brought on by a lack of safe drinking water in the worst affected areas of the southern Sindh and Balochistan provinces.
      The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) said the organization was ramping up support to the Pakistan Red Crescent Society volunteers and staff with the release of 315,000 Swiss Francs ($316,000) in emergency funds.
      The Red Cross will aim to reach 15,000 of the most vulnerable people threatened by disease and drought, it said.
      “This will allow the Red Crescent to improve access to safe drinking water through solar boreholes, storage facilities, improved water treatment and other services,” the IFRC’s head of country office, Thomas Gurtner, said in a statement.
      “...the most vulnerable people (will) receive cash transfers that give them full control of providing for their families.”
      An estimated 5 million people are affected by the drought, which was caused by unseasonably high temperatures and below average monsoon rainfall, both of which are influenced by the El Niño weather phenomenon, the Red Cross said.
      Conditions have recently deteriorated in the drought affected areas with malnutrition rates increasing to 30 percent, the U.N.'s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said in January.
      The water table has dropped in most valleys and low-lying areas, and food production in the affected areas has dropped by 34 per cent, according to the IFRC.
      The Pakistan Meteorological Department forecasts that the situation will continue to deteriorate over the next four years, in part due to climate change.

      Video Report - Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj Speaks At Meet Of Islamic Nations (OIC)

      #Pakistan - #PPP - Asif Zardari opposes decision to skip #OIC meeting

      Pakistan People's Party leader Asif Zardari has opposed government's decision to skip OIC's Council of Foreign Minister's meeting.Speaking during the joint sitting of the parliament, he said Islamabad can send Foreign Secretary to the meeting.

      "It is my opinion that Foreign Minister should attend Council of Foreign Minister's meeting," he said.
      "Not going is not the solution to problem. We should not forget our friends," said the PPP co-chairman.He, however, fully supported the government's decision to release captured Indian pilot.
      Zardari said it would improve Pakistan's image in the world.
      He also paid tribute to the Pakistani pilot who downed the Indian aircraft earlier this week.
       https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/438401-asif-zardari-opposes-decision-to-skip-oic-meeting

      Govt’s OIC decision unfortunate, international forums must be engaged: Bilawal

      Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Friday termed the government’s decision to not attend the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) Council of Foreign Ministers meeting in Abu Dhabi as “unfortunate.”
      In a tweet following Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s announcement that Pakistan will not attend the OIC moot in protest against the OIC's decision to invite Indian Minister of External Affairs Sushma Swaraj, Bilawal said important international forums must be engaged at this critical time.
      “Unfortunate government has decided not to attend OIC. Important international forums must be engaged at this critical time. To put Pakistan’s point of views across and expose India’s belligerence & naked aggression. Cutting your nose to spite your face is never a great strategy,” the PPP chairman said. 
      In a joint session of the Parliament earlier today, Foreign Minister Qureshi reiterated his protest against the OIC's decision to invite his Indian counterpart Swaraj to attend the meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers in Abu Dhabi, and said he will not attend the session due to the inter-governmental organisation's failure to rescind the invitation to Swaraj. 
      https://www.geo.tv/latest/229697-govts-oic-decision-unfortunate-international-forums-must-be-engaged-bilawal

      #Pakistan - #PPP - No one matches Bilawal Bhutto’s political vision

      Advisor to Chief Minister Sindh on Information, Law and Anti-Corruption, Barrister Murtaza Wahab has said that Chairman of PPP Bilawal Bhutto Zardari always speaks rationally and no one matches his political vision in the country.
      In a statement on Friday, the Advisor said that Bilawal is one of the few leaders of the subcontinent, who possessed moderate ideology in the political scenario at present.
      He said that the PPP chairman has always talked about peace and tranquility by following the footsteps of his mother Shaheed Benazir Bhutto and Grandfather Shaheed Zulfqar Ali Bhutto who exalted the flag of peace in the region.
      He said that their chairman is continuation of their great leadership who is propagating the message of peace among the people his country.
      https://www.brecorder.com/2019/03/01/478196/no-one-matches-bilawal-bhuttos-political-vision/

      Bilawal Bhutto pays rich tribute to ex-federal minister Shaheed Shahbaz Bhatti on his 8th martyrdom anniversary

      Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has paid rich tribute to ex-federal minister Shaheed Shahbaz Bhatti on his 8th martyrdom anniversary.

      In his message, the PPP Chairman said that Shaheed Shahbaz Bhatti was very vibrant PPP leader and who devoted his life for bringing people from different thoughts of people near each other. He, while strictly adhering to the Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s ideology, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto’s philosophy and the reconciliation policy of former President Asif Ali Zardari, had contributed a lot towards religious harmony and tranquility. 

      The enemies of humanity had silenced him to death over his untiring efforts for the religious harmony and peace.

      Though Shaheed Shahbaz Bhatti is not among us today but the mission of equality, peace and tranquility and tolerance is still alive and PPP would make the dreams of its martyrs a reality one day, the Party Chairman vowed.

      Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that no power on Earth could prevent Pakistan from becoming a progressive and peaceful society, a land of equality and a truly democratic country.


      https://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/2019/03/01/bilawal-bhutto-zardari-pays-rich-tribute-to-ex-federal-minister-shaheed-shahbaz-bhatti-on-his-8th-martyrdom-anniversary/