Tuesday, June 19, 2018

#Pakistan - Western Feminism - Imran’s latest gaffe


Imran Khan is a man who sees the premiership firmly within reach. It is therefore most unfortunate that no one sent him the memo. The one cautioning men in positions of power to keep schtum when it comes to discussing feminism and motherhood.
The latest gaffe has seen the PTI chairman conclude that “western feminism has degraded the role of mothers”. What he means by this still remains rather unclear. Though there was mention of how children learn from their mothers; especially when it comes to the mother tongue.
Which may or may not be another way of saying that Kaptaan subscribes to the notion that a woman’s place is in the home; at least when children are in the need of primary caregivers. To say that this is an outdated notion is an understatement. Particularly as it appears to take as its premise the idea of a nuclear family whereby both parents are present and fully attendant. Yet here in Pakistan, as anywhere else, there is no one-size-fits-all.
Moreover, children can best learn from their mothers or any adult women in their lives what it means to respect women; be they homemakers or as they climb their way up the career ladder. For here in the 21st century, women are not restricted to either one or the other. The world has moved on due to the struggle of generations and generations of women who came before.
Equally regrettable, however, is the false demarcation between western feminism and ‘the other’. For this unnecessarily pits one group of women against another — when the endgame ought to be the same: equal rights. Or, rather, equality of opportunity between the sexes. But what Imran has unwittingly or otherwise reduced this to, is a conflicting narrative between women of the First World and those of the Global South.
And this has inevitably played out in the legitimate social media backlash against him. Meaning that what we have seen from certain quarters is the message that women in Europe, say, do not share the same struggle as Pakistani women given that the latter are fighting for fundamental rights. This is, of course true, for the majority. But such one-dimensional discourse conveniently circumvents the issue of class. Both here in Pakistan, where some feminists all too often speak for the rural poor. And in Europe, where working-class women increasingly find it difficult to feed themselves and their families.
The issue at hand is not, therefore, what kind of feminism different women believe in but, instead, a recognition that the patriarchy still needs to be smashed. And urgently so. For this global system of gendered injustice will continue to triumph for as long as women are held responsible for suffering at the hands of those who would first oppress them and then castigate them for trying to redress the balance.
All of which is an unwelcome distraction from the issue at hand. Namely, what will a Naya Pakistan look like for the women of this country? We sincerely hope it will be one where women are encouraged to fulfil their individual potential in whichever way they choose.  *

#Pakistan's notorious militant Mullah Fazlullah Gone -- خس کم جہاں پاک




This Eid ul Fitr was special for the entire nation. At last, the notorious militant Mullah Fazlullah –who was head of Tehreek Taliban Pakistan (TTP) – was killed in a drone strike. The news came as a sigh of relief for many whose lives became miserable as these militants not only wrecked the peace of the country but also killed thousands of civilians including children. The scars of attack on Army Public School Peshawar are still fresh in the collective memory of the people.

The death of the TTP leader will also pave the way for better bilateral relations between Islamabad and Kabul. The drone strike that killed the notorious Taliban leader was a joint effort thus strengthening Islamabad’s stance “that a cooperative and coordinated approach is the best response to the menace of terrorism.” The reports that the TTP has confirmed its leader death as well means that their leader is gone for sure unlike the previous false claims about his death.
Meanwhile, when the organisation is in tatters and trying hard to find a haven, it is crucial for America, Afghanistan and Pakistan to work jointly to eradicate terrorism from the region. Instead of securing narrow national interests, a better approach towards the elimination of terrorism and militancy will be if the governments work together to strengthen cooperation and coordination.
The confirmation of Fazlullah’s death will no doubt remove the environment of mistrust between the two neighbours. His demise is also a considerable loss to the TTP. The killing of TTP’s chief is a sigh of relief for Pakistan since he never appreciated dialogue or rapprochement with Islamabad. However, what is essential for all the concerned governments is to keep the fact in mind that his death will not bring Taliban to stop from their attacks on Pakistan. His death is only a temporary setback to the movement. While individuals may be necessary, their end does not mean the elimination of a cause. The uneasy partners in this war on terror need to come up with a strategy that can dismantle the movement.

PPP has always indulged in politics of principles: Asif Ali Zardari




Former president and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari said on Sunday that former prime minister Nawaz Sharif has brought Pakistan to a place where the world is making fun of the country.
Talking to the media after a visit to PPP leader Abdul Haq Bhurt’s house here, Zardari said that the PPP has always indulged in politics of principles.
The PPP co-chairman claimed further that the party’s candidates will emerge victorious in the upcoming general election on July 25 and the party will form a government.
Zardari added that the incoming PPP government will right the wrongs committedby the Nawaz-led government which was dissolved on May 31 this year.

Monday, June 18, 2018

Video Report - Stones, torches & tear gas: Macedonians protest country’s name change

Video - Is it sexual harassment to stare at co-worker? Netflix apparently has the answer

Video - Jeff Sessions Cites The Bible In Separating Children From Parents - with Stephen Colbert

Video Report - Photographer explains photo of crying toddler at border

Video Report - Hillary Clinton: Trump's separation defense is an outright lie

Video Report - #Trudeau urged to scrap U.S. border pact, Trump defends policy

Michelle Obama Seconds Laura Bush’s Criticism Of Child Separation Policy

By Michelle Lou


Former first lady Michelle Obama neatly criticized the Trump administration’s child separation policy on Monday, breaking from the Obamas’ practice of (mostly) staying quiet about the current president.
“Sometimes truth transcends party,” she wrote, pointing to former first lady Laura Bush’s Washington Post op-ed in which Obama’s Republican predecessor criticized the practice of separating immigrant children from their undocumented parents at the border.
Former President Barack Obama retweeted his wife’s post shortly afterward.
Former first lady Hillary Clinton also backed up Bush’s criticisms against the Trump administration’s controversial immigration policy on Monday.
“What’s happening to families at the border right now is a humanitarian crisis,” Clinton said. “Every parent who has ever held a child in their arms, every human being with a sense of compassion and decency, should be outraged.”
Former first lady Rosalynn Carter spoke out as well, calling the practice “disgraceful” and “a shame to our country.”
Democrats and Republicans alike have voiced opposition to the child separation policy, which the Trump administration has defended as a method to crack down on illegal entry into the country.
“Americans pride ourselves on being a moral nation, on being the nation that sends humanitarian relief to places devastated by natural disasters or famine or war,” Bush wrote in her op-ed. “We pride ourselves on believing that people should be seen for the content of their character, not the color of their skin. We pride ourselves on acceptance. If we are truly that country, then it is our obligation to reunite these detained children with their parents — and to stop separating parents and children in the first place.
This article has been updated to include comments from Clinton and Carter. 
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/michelle-obama-laura-bush-child-separation-policy_us_5b27f121e4b0f9178a9fe449

Clinton: Separating families at border a 'moral crisis'




By Deepti Hajela

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday called Trump administration's "zero tolerance" policy that has separated children from their parents at the southern U.S. border "a moral and humanitarian crisis."
the 
Speaking at an awards lunch for the Women's Forum of New York, Clinton said what was happening to families at the U.S.-Mexico border is "horrific."
"Every human being with a sense of compassion and decency should be outraged," Clinton said.
The separations stem from a policy that turns all cases of people trying to enter the country illegally over for criminal prosecution. Children are not detained with their parents when those parents are facing a criminal charge, as per U.S. protocol.
President Donald Trump has defended the policy, which has taken nearly 2,000 immigrant children away from their parents.
"The United States will not be a migrant camp and it will not be a refugee holding facility," he added. "Not on my watch," Trump said Monday.
Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, said she had warned during the campaign that Trump's hard-line immigration stance would result in family separations.
"Now as we watch with broken hearts, that's exactly what's happening," she said.

The policy has come under increasingly strong criticism, with accounts of children kept in cages and parents not knowing where their children are.
Trump has falsely blamed Democrats, and his administration has echoed his stance by claiming it was enforcing the law, with some using the Bible as religious justification.
Clinton pushed back on all of those points, saying the separations are required by no law and grounded in no religion.
"The test of any nation is how we treat the most vulnerable among us," she said. "We are a better country than one that tears families apart."

Laura Bush: Separating children from their parents at the border ‘breaks my heart’

Laura Bush

Laura Bush is a former first lady of the United States.
On Sunday, a day we as a nation set aside to honor fathers and the bonds of family, I was among the millions of Americans who watched images of children who have been torn from their parents. In the six weeks between April 19 and May 31, the Department of Homeland Security has sent nearly 2,000 children to mass detention centers or foster care. More than 100 of these children are younger than 4 years old. The reason for these separations is a zero-tolerance policy for their parents, who are accused of illegally crossing our borders.
I live in a border state. I appreciate the need to enforce and protect our international boundaries, but this zero-tolerance policy is cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart.
Our government should not be in the business of warehousing children in converted box stores or making plans to place them in tent cities in the desert outside of El Paso. These images are eerily reminiscent of the internment camps for U.S. citizens and noncitizens of Japanese descent during World War II, now considered to have been one of the most shameful episodes in U.S. history. We also know that this treatment inflicts trauma; those who have been interned have been twice as likely to suffer cardiovascular disease or die prematurely than those who were not interned.
Americans pride ourselves on being a moral nation, on being the nation that sends humanitarian relief to places devastated by natural disasters or famine or war. We pride ourselves on believing that people should be seen for the content of their character, not the color of their skin. We pride ourselves on acceptance. If we are truly that country, then it is our obligation to reunite these detained children with their parents — and to stop separating parents and children in the first place.

People on all sides agree that our immigration system isn’t working, but the injustice of zero tolerance is not the answer. I moved away from Washington almost a decade ago, but I know there are good people at all levels of government who can do better to fix this.
Recently, Colleen Kraft, who heads the American Academy of Pediatrics, visited a shelter run by the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement. She reported that while there were beds, toys, crayons, a playground and diaper changes, the people working at the shelter had been instructed not to pick up or touch the children to comfort them. Imagine not being able to pick up a child who is not yet out of diapers.
Twenty-nine years ago, my mother-in-law, Barbara Bush, visited Grandma’s House, a home for children with HIV/AIDS in Washington. Back then, at the height of the HIV/AIDS crisis, the disease was a death sentence, and most babies born with it were considered “untouchables.” During her visit, Barbara — who was the first lady at the time — picked up a fussy, dying baby named Donovan and snuggled him against her shoulder to soothe him. My mother-in-law never viewed her embrace of that fragile child as courageous. She simply saw it as the right thing to do in a world that can be arbitrary, unkind and even cruel. She, who after the death of her 3-year-old daughter knew what it was to lose a child, believed that every child is deserving of human kindness, compassion and love.
In 2018, can we not as a nation find a kinder, more compassionate and more moral answer to this current crisis? I, for one, believe we can.