Saturday, February 17, 2018

#FloridaSchoolShooting - After Florida school shooting, thousands demand change at anti-gun rally


Victims of the recent Florida school shooting have called out politicians for their lack of action after yet another deadly massacre. "Shame on you!" the crowd said to President Trump and the National Rifle Association.

Thousands of students, parents and gun control advocates rallied in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on Saturday to demand changes in legislation after 17 people were shot and killed at a high school in the nearby town of Parkland.
"They say a good guy with a gun stops a bad guy with a gun," said student Emma Gonzalez on the steps of Fort Lauderdale's federal courthouse. "We call BS."
The students also excoriated President Donald Trump and the National Rifle Association (NRA) for creating an environment in the United States where even the smallest gun control proposals come up against fierce resistance.
"Shame on you!" the crowd chanted.
Gonzalez also gave voice to a question many in the US have been asking since Wednesday's shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School: How did 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz, a former student who was known to be mentally ill and exhibit erratic behavior, come to legally purchase an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle?
FBI admits mistakes
The FBI has admitted that it received two tips about Cruz, but failed to act. One came last September, when a man reported a disturbing comment left by someone named Nikolas Cruz on his YouTube channel. "I'm going to be a professional school shooter," the user proclaimed. The agency was unable to pinpoint the source of the comment.
Then, in January, a person close to Cruz called the FBI with information about Cruz's firearms and disturbing behavior, but the agency failed to follow up on the tip. The FBI has acknowledged that the information should have been shared with its local office in Miami, where it could have been investigated.
Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel has also said his office received more than 20 calls about Cruz in the past few years. At least two of these calls reportedly came from his own mother, before her death in November.
Cruz's mental health was also a matter of public record, as he has been diagnosed with autism and ADHD and had undergone psychological evaluation by state authorities. However, he was able to pass a background check to purchase his AR-15, which despite being designed for military use is easier to get in Florida than a handgun.
During her speech, Emma Gonzalez slammed the reasoning used by many conservative politicians that school shootings are usually the product of mental health issues and would not be prevented by tightened gun control laws.
"He wouldn't have harmed that many students with a knife," she pointed out.
Cruz has been charged with 17 counts of murder. According to police, he confessed to the crime while in custody.

Video Report - #FloridaSchoolShooting - Don Lemon: Gun violence is a sickness

Video Report - #FloridaSchoolShooting - Gun control rally held near Parkland school shooting

How can a disturbed young man buy an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle before he's old enough to buy a beer?




Arsenal: This picture shows the wide variety of weaponry owned by Nikolas Cruz - including an AR-15 - center and what appears to be a handgun on the right of the picture 
Police investigates gun store where Nikolas Cruz purchased AR15
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:51
Previous
Pause
Skip
Unmute
Current Time0:51
/
Duration Time3:11
Fullscreen
Need Text

  • Weak federal law on long-gun ownership has created an inconsistent system

  • In some states, like Florida, it is relatively simple to buy an AR-15 assault rifle 

  • No federal age restriction on buying a long-gun from an unlicensed dealer

  • Florida shooter Nikolas Cruz, 19, purchased his own AR-15 and killed 17 

  • After yet another mass shooting carried out using an AR-15, critics of the nation's uneven gun laws have called for change to a system which allows an American to buy an assault rifle before a beer.
    Indeed, following the rampage of Nikolas Cruz on Wednesday during which he killed 17 with a legally obtained weapon at a Florida high school, many are asking why a liquor store is stricter than a gun store?
    Federal law dictates that you have to be 21 to buy a handgun from a licensed dealer, but 18 to purchase one from an unlicensed dealer who operates online or at a registered gunshow.
    However, for long guns such as AR-15s and shotguns, while the federal age is 21, there is essentially no minimum age to legally buy one from an unlicensed dealer.
    Some gun-shy states such as California and New York impose their own stricter regulations ontop of the federal law, so even though they will sell hunting rifles to 16-year-olds, assault rifles such as the AR-15 are totally banned. But some states like Kentucky and Kansas do not bolster the bare federal law at all, meaning that legally it would be up to the conscience of the dealer to sell or not to sell to anyone old enough to exchange money and buy an AR-15. Despite the mishmash of gun laws across the nation according to the Giffords Law Center there are 30 states that have 18 as a minimum age to buy an AR-15.
    But of course the United States has a drinking age of 21, meaning that a teenager can legally arm himself with enough weaponry to kill 17 at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, but to drink one can of beer is breaking the law.
    Furthermore, in Florida, a 21-year-old buying a handgun would have had to wait three-days for the weapon but could have picked up an assault rifle that afternoon.
    The only thing stopping the sale of the AR-15 to Cruz would have been if the dealer thought he was of 'unsound mind' or a criminal conviction for assault or domestic abuse.
    However, despite the FBI receiving two reports that Cruz was threatening a school shooting online, the teen was never placed on a watchlist.
    But that still may not have mattered, because in Florida, the stricest definition of the law says that anyone can buy an assault rifle unless 'adjudicated mentally defective or involuntarily committed by a judge'. The family of Cruz knew he kept a small arsenal and according to their attorney Jim Lewis, he was forced by them to keep it under lock and key.
    And Peter Forcelli the special agent in charge for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Miami added that all the weapons Cruz purchased were bought legally.
    'No laws were violated in the procurement of this weapon', said Forcelli according to the New York Times.

    Punjabi Music - Sayoni Mera Mahi Meray Paag Jagawan Aa Gaya - Noor Jehan

    Punjabi Music - Dildar Sadqay - دلدار صدقے - Madam Noor Jahan

    Pashto Music - Ahmad Zahir ( Obe derta Rawrlem)

    Pashto Music - Khyal Mohammad & Mah Jabeen - Sterge De Kachkol Krra Wakhla

    Urdu Music Video - Ahmed Rushdi - Betaab Ho Udhar Tum - Armaan - Waheed Murad Zeba & Nirala

    #Pakistan - Tackling child sexual abuse: awareness, identification and prevention

    Child sexual abuse is a critical issue that we need to be discussing in schools and at home.
    These articles have been produced in partnership with Aahung, a non-profit organisation that has been working since 1994 to improve sexual and reproductive health and rights of people in Pakistan.
    Aahung works extensively on child sexual abuse through its Life Skills Based Education curriculum implemented in about 400 primary and secondary schools around the country.
    The organisation works closely with teachers and caregivers on helping children stay safe and runs media campaigns to raise awareness.

    Following is an account, as told to Sadia Khatri, by two para-counsellors who teach grades 4 and 5 in Karachi and have implemented Aahung’s Life Skills curriculum at their school.

    There are certain topics that are difficult for children to broach – the most glaring of these is child sexual abuse. But, in the past year we have noticed a shift.
    Students are becoming more vocal and are sharing their problems, both with teachers and with each other. On several occasions, students have approached us on another’s behalf.
    In 2016, our school introduced Life Skills, a single-period class dedicated to discussing a range of social and psychological issues, including gender inequality and bullying.
    Within Life Skills, we have been able to raise a conversation about child sexual abuse.
    We want to remove misconceptions around the issue of abuse, equip children how to defend themselves, and teach them how to say “No”.
    In situations where abuse is occurring, we want to encourage them to speak up about it by assuring them that there is nothing immoral about the topic.
    We started off by accommodating Life Skills during our 20-minute assembly. This proved difficult. There were too many students – we have 300 in each class – and not enough time. We had to restructure the whole programme to run it smoothly.
    Now, Life Skills is a slotted period in each grade – so the children know it is part of their time table, they are familiar with the teacher who takes their class, and they know exactly what to anticipate during the discussion.
    The first step of the programme is to build a relationship with the students based on comfort and trust. We assure them that the conversations will remain confidential.
    Before initiating the topic of abuse, we segregate the children, sending either all the boys or all the girls to art class.
    This is because there are some differences in how we contextualise the lessons, especially when talking about the body.
    It is also because children open up more when they are in the company of their own gender.
    We start by establishing the fact that there is nothing immoral in talking about abuse. It can happen anywhere, with anyone. Some of us also experienced abuse when we were children.
    If any of the students are in an unsafe situation, we encourage them to tell their parents.
    We assure them that their parents will understand and support them, and that we are available to intervene if necessary.
    At first, children hesitate: “We don’t have any issues, Miss. We have no problems.”
    But once one or two children speak up, others begin to open up as well.
    We try to create an open and safe space where they can share anything. We have to keep reminding them: our goal here is not to create fuss about your issues, or to report them anywhere.
    Our goal is to help you relax and feel better. We explain to them how some problems can be resolved just by sharing them – how speaking up can be therapeutic.
    Of course, not all children are comfortable verbalising their issues. To be inclusive, one of our activities involves handing out pieces of paper on which they can write down their thoughts.
    We want to give them a healthy outlet. Sometimes just writing on paper is a healthy way to vent.
    If they wish to share these with the teacher, they may; otherwise they are encouraged to tear up the papers and throw them away.
    The idea here is to solidify trust by assuring children that they will not be forced to do anything.
    Some incidents occur on the streets and at tuition centres but we have found that most abuse occurs in home spaces.
    Last week, a girl confided to us in writing. She had been undergoing abuse by her cousin, who came to take care of her while her mother was away. With the girl’s consent, we offered to mediate and called in her mother.
    At first, the mother was shocked. This is a common reaction – parents often find these revelations hard to believe. Sometimes they react with strong opposition, claiming that we are mistaken.
    Before initiating Life Skills, we held information sessions for all parents, to ensure that we had their support.
    Even though they were all on board and had given their consent, when it comes to confronting the truth, not all of them want to accept that their child is in danger.
    In their minds, abuse is immoral. The log kya kahein ge [what will people say]? mentality feeds their worry – they fear for their reputation in society, and if the child is a girl, they fear for her future.
    We have to assure parents that the matter will stay confidential, and that our greatest concern is their child’s safety. Eventually, they come around.
    In the case of the mother last week, she believed us only once we showed her the child’s handwritten note. She could not believe that it was happening in her house.
    Since then, she has become much more alert. Now she takes the child with her everywhere.
    Since we usually live in close-knit neighbourhoods, it’s rare for parents to confront their child’s abuser. Their intervention is limited to heightening their child’s safety – as with this mother, who cannot say anything to her child’s abuser because they are part of the same family.
    Once, another mother said to us: “I can only ensure my child’s safety. You have no idea what will happen if I take a public stand. If I accuse the abuser, he will unleash a storm in my home.”
    Often children themselves are afraid of their parents. Given the gap in communication between parents and children, their fear is not misplaced.
    It starts early on. When children start asking questions about changes in their body, they are either dismissed or given a nonsensical answer, or their prying is treated as something immoral.
    Then there is the manner in which we talk about sex. When a child is born in the family, parents offer different, misleading explanations: one says the child came in a basket, the other says it was dropped off in the night.
    Being children, they obviously consult each other and realise there are discrepancies – this heightens their curiosity and makes room for even more misleading information.
    Parents’ dismissal builds mistrust, and children do not feel fully comfortable discussing everything around them.
    A supportive outlet is shut off, and as a result, children going through trauma or abuse feel even more insecure.
    Their mental health deteriorates and they fear admonishment from their parents. Often they begin to internalise guilt and blame themselves, afraid that if their parents find out, they will be held responsible.
    There are several changes that parents must make in their behaviour.
    First, they need to talk openly with their children, and resist the impulse to sweep sensitive topics under the carpet.
    Second, parents must stay informed and involved in their children’s day-to-day activities.
    You should know where your child is going and with whom they are spending their time.
    One way to solidify trust is to create a habit. For example, ask your child how their day went before they go to sleep at night.
    Your child might not always have a lot to share, but at least they will realise that there is space for them to speak to you.
    Once they know that you care, they will begin to feel safe discussing anything with you.
    Lastly, believe your children. Your child should feel confident confiding in you.
    They should not approach you with the fear of admonishment, but with the conviction that they will be believed.
    Implementing the Life Skills programme has not been a smooth process. Selecting teachers is the key challenge.
    When the course was introduced, many teachers were initially hesitant taking it on and felt the content was too sensitive.
    Untrained teachers cannot run these classes, so all of us first have to undergo training by Aahung.
    But workshops aside, teachers first need to have the confidence that is required to discuss abuse.
    They need to be emotionally well-equipped to talk to children. This is not always the case.
    Some female teachers have trouble with boys. Others, who had received the training, backed off when it was time to deliver.
    We are six teachers handling grades 4 and 5. There are also teachers who run Life Skills sessions at the secondary school. At least through our efforts, some of the children are now safe.
    But the process does not end there. Children can be fragile even after they are out of danger. Sometimes you have to provide extra care.
    For example, there is a girl who often shows up out of nowhere to see us. We know she has been through abuse, so we never turn her away.
    Sometimes she wants to share something simple – nothing related to her trauma. But we know that she is seeking comfort and that it is important for her to be listened to.
    Furthermore, we have to ensure that students who have experienced abuse feel safe in their new classes.
    If they have a trusting relationship with a particular teacher, we try to adjust their class so they don’t have to deal with anyone new.
    At the beginning of the school year, there was a student who refused to sit in her new class. When we placed her back with her former teacher, she calmed down again.
    Delivering the Life Skills workshops can be a challenging experience, but the teachers who have been implementing the programme have seen how vital and transformative it can be for children who are being abused or are survivors of abuse.

    If you have been a victim of sexual abuse, you can contact the following organisations for counselling: Aahung, Rozan, Sahil, Madadgaar

    Click on the buttons below to read more.

    #AsmaJahangir - Asma’s struggle



    By Afrasiab Khattak


    Sad news of the sudden death of Asma Jehangir on February 11 not only shocked to core her family, friends and followers in Pakistan but it also hit hard many people around the world as she was one of the internationally best known Pakistanis with a positive image. As a woman of substance and strong personality her words and actions during her life used to evoke strong feelings among both her supporters and detractors. Her death proved to be no different. Social media in particular got almost jammed by the large scale outpouring of feelings reflected in comments. But the strength and scale of the twin feelings of sorrow and solidarity for her during her funeral clearly demonstrated the imprint that her struggle has left on the hearts and minds of the people of Pakistan. As various reports have put it, her funeral was a microcosm of the Pakistan she had envisioned; democratic plural, inclusive, liberal and humane. Her ideals and her struggle inspired many people. There are various other people in Pakistan who also espouse the same ideals. But it was the type of determined and courageous struggle for achieving these ideals which distinguishes Asma Jehangir from all others.
    As one of her friends tweeted she was more of activism than an idea and that her principles were more real than theoretic. It was because she was forced to start her struggle at the young age of eighteen years to defend her father Malik Ghulam Jilani in courts against the despotic military regime that was hell bent on keeping him in prison for his criticism of martial law. The well known Asma Jeelani case against General Yahya’s martial law bears testimony to this fact. Again it was due to the high profile involvement of her father in the country’s politics that she could watch the unfolding political crises in 1971 in detail that ultimately led to the dismemberment of the country. Her father along with other democrats ( such as Abdul Wali Khan, Ghous Bakhsh Bezinjo and a few others) was opposed to military action against the popularly elected representatives of the people of the then East Pakistan ( Bangladesh now) as that was the sure path towards disintegration of the country, a contention validated by the subsequent chain of events. But sticking to such views in Lahore at that time, was to invite the intense wrath of Punjabi chauvinism. It meant living in the environment of blind hatred. Asma had many stories to tell about the type of animosity that she and her siblings had to face because of their family background. So the direction of her struggle was swimming against the tide from the word go and it remained so almost throughout her life. Facing venomous opposition from reactionary forces at quite young age proved to be an important factor in shaping her personality for the future struggle .
    Even when she started working for establishing an organised indigenous human rights movement in Pakistan in 1980s it was a time when the country was pushed into deep regression by the reactionary military dictatorship of Zia-ul-Haq. Religious extremism was used to reinforce the already deeply entrenched patriarchy. But when legal and social discrimination against women reached unacceptable levels Pakistani women, particularly in the main urban centres decided to come out to the streets against it and Asma was in the forefront of this struggle . Religious minorities also faced a tough situation when General Zia decided to use the slogan of Islamisation for perpetuating his unconstitutional anti people rule. These were the issues that the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan had to immediately grapple with just after its formation in 1987. Students unions, trade unions and professional associations were facing bans and repression. Asma was in the mainstream of people’s resistance against the military dictatorship. She was lucky to have some of the best Pakistanis on her side at this initial stage of HRCP. They included journalists I A Rehman, Aziz Siddiqi & Nisar Usmani ; lawyers such as Sabihuddin Ahmad and Tahir Mohammad Khan, woman activists such Anees Haroon, Zohar Yosuf, Alys Faiz and many others. Active support by Justice (r) Durab Patel gave boost to the movement. But for the military authorities and religious political parties the rise of a young and courageous female lawyer as a star of people’s resistance was totally unacceptable. So they launched vicious propaganda campaigns against her based on lies and fabrications attacking her patriotism and faith. This concoction was recycled again and again by anti democratic forces who were always afraid of her clear and bold stand against the tyranny of military dictatorship.
    ''I had the honour of working with her in the human rights movement. She had no hesitation in challenging exploitation, discrimination and oppression in every nook and corner of Pakistan. ''  Afrasiab Khattak.

    HRCP’s campaign against bonded labor high lighted the despicable cruelty of the feudal bondage and hundreds of men, women and children were released from the clutches of feudal lords. Asma had a unique capacity to connect with the wretched of the earth of all regions, speaking different languages and professing different faiths. It was a life time experience to see her galvanising peasant women in Badin and Tharparker ( Sindh) and inspiring female teachers deep inside Momand Agency near Ghalanai ( FATA). Each of her visit to Gilgit Baltistan would creat hope among the oppressed people of the area. Asma courageously exposed state atrocities in Balochistan at critical junctures. I accompanied Asma in her visit to Dera Bugti in August 2006. Our vehicle came under fire just beyond Kashmore as we entered Balochistan on our way to Sui and Dera Bugti. Authorities had hoped that firing on the vehicle would scare Asma away but actually her determination to visit the area became stronger after the incident. The next day we went to Sui and Dera Bugti and had a meeting with Nawab Akbar Bugti who was killed in a military operation soon after our meeting. On our return Asma exposed the reign of terror unleashed by the state against the Baloch population.
    Asma understood the relationship between peace and democracy. That’s why she actively participated in peace movements. She led many peace delegations to India and she was instrumental in creating Pakistan-Afghanistan People’s Friendship Association in 2002. She was a trail blazer on the path of struggle for people’s rights. She has left a rich legacy behind her.

    #JusticeForZainab - #Pakistan - Justice for Zainab?

    Justice for little Zainab has been delivered. Or has it? An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) awarded the man who confessed the brutal crimes committed against the seven-year-old a total of four death sentences: for kidnapping, rape and murder. He was also sentenced to life imprisonment as well as being fined for performing an unnatural act with a minor. And for desecrating human remains he also faces an additional seven years in prison.
    For the family, nothing short of a public execution will do. They believe this will act as a deterrent to others. But as we know from Saudi Arabia’s experience, this will solve nothing. We commend the law enforcement agencies for acting swiftly to apprehend guilty party; while noting that this only happened after the media and civil society took up the issue. Though now the judge has sentenced Imran Ali — we need to take a deep breath and decide what sort of country we wish to be.
    And this means starting with our criminal justice system. DNA from Ali is said to have matched that taken from seven other minor girls who were abducted and sexually abused in the same area. This naturally begs the question as to whether or not he will also be tried for their murders. And then there is the matter of the defendant’s defence counsel reportedly informing the judge that he would not be able to represent Imran Ali given his confession; which he had already given on the very first day of trial. But above and beyond all that — we have to ask if the higher judiciary is so weak that cases involving the rape and murder of little girls or the lynching to death of a young man on false blasphemy charges are now routinely presented before ATCs. This is the reintroduction of the death penalty for civilians by another name. And represents yet another instance of keeping Parliament out of the loop.
    Yet elsewhere, the Supreme Court has fared no better. It opted to award former SSP Rao Anwar protective bail instead of ordering his arrest for his alleged role in the extra-judicial killing of, among others, a young Pashtun man. And then he failed to present himself before the court. This, sadly, smacks of selective justice. Surely, if anyone is to go before an ATC it should be those who may or may not have broken their pledge to keep the citizenry safe.
    Thus in light of the seemingly piecemeal approaches to justice that Pakistan has witnessed in recent times — we urge Parliament takes up the issue for debate. That, after all, is the job of our lawmakers.

    #PAKISTAN’S ‘SAFE HAVEN’ PROBLEM

    ISLAMABAD HAS A WAYS TO GO BEFORE THE WORLD CAN BE CONVINCED IT IS TAKING EFFECTIVE AGAINST TERROR FINANCIERS
    The United States, together with Britain, France and Germany, are going to decide in Paris whether to place Pakistan on a global terror-financing watchlist at the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The member states are concerned about Pakistan’s “deficiencies” in combating “money laundering and terrorist financing” and in preventing terrorists from attacking inside Afghanistan from its territory. Pakistan wants to know more about the complaints about its “safe havens,” but the United States seems unwilling to share information while appreciating Pakistan’s disbandment of U.N.-sanctioned Jamaatud Dawa and its charity adjuncts.
    Pakistan has a problem with Washington over accusations of Islamabad sheltering Afghan militants who attack inside Afghanistan across the Durand Line. Both sides seem to be on a different wavelength on the issue, but the fact that the U.S. is supported by Britain, France and Germany at the FATF is a matter of great concern and Pakistan must take steps to disarm this negative alliance against it. The past doesn’t help because of willful neglect of complaints about such organizations as Jamaatud Dawa, the Afghan Taliban-in-exile and Pakistani Taliban, whom it used inside its territory. For instance, political parties such as Pakistan Peoples Party and the Awami National Party in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa were virtually shut down by the Taliban while the PTI, friendly to the terrorists, were allowed freedom to contest and win the 2013 election.
    The world is less inclined to believe Pakistan because of its lack of credibility. It denied that Osama bin Laden was in Abbottabad and Mullah Omar—and still denies Dawood Ibrahim’s presence—in Karachi. Jaish-e-Muhammad terrorist Masood Azhar is not supposed to be in Pakistan either and the Haqqani Network’s commanders are found and killed on its territory by drones. Pakistan’s recent step to ban Jamaatud Dawa goes some ways to disarm international suspicion and hopefully it will change tack sufficiently to duck any economic sanctions coming its way.

    http://newsweekpakistan.com/pakistans-safe-haven-problem/

    Video Report - Chairman #PPP Bilawal Bhutto,s interview to Russian TV Chanel RT.

    Peace in Afghanistan has to be an Afghan led peace, says Bilawal Bhutto



    In an interview with Russian Television the Chairperson of Pakistan People’s Party, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari expressed his party’s views about the Afghan War, the Syrian Crisis and International Relations on the whole.

    When asked about Pakistan-US relations and the prolonged state of the Afghan War, he said “Unfortunately the Afghan War has turned into this forever war, where the United States has lost sight of its objectives, it seems that they do not know, why they are there, what they are going to do, or how they are going to get out.”
    He identified terrorist activity and the slipping writ of state to be the two major problems that plague Pakistan’s northwestern neighbour. “The fact of the matter is that 75 % of Afghanistan witnesses terrorist activity, 45% of Afghanistan is not in control of the Afghan government”, he said.
    Asserting Pakistan’s position on the recent bombings in Afghanistan the PPP chairperson said, “We want there to be peace in Afghanistan, but it has to be an Afghan led peace and the Afghan Forces and NATO Forces need to start taking responsibility for their failures, if they have not been successful, its time for us to rethink what we are doing.”
    Speaking about the Syrian crisis and the aftermath of the war, he said, “The PPP and I, believe in non-interventionist foreign policies and that if change is to take place, it should take place domestically and organically.”
    He further added that the West got ‘overly excited’ by the Arab Spring and did not allow it to take its organic conclusion. He pointed out that individuals and state agendas should not be cultivated in Afghanistan, Syria or Iraq, the will of the people should preside.
    Moving on to international relations, he said, “We have always emphasised good relations with all countries, especially our neighbours. I don’t think it is fair to expect Pakistan to not maintain good relations with its neighbours.”
    He talked about the vitality of harnessing good relations between Pakistan and Russia, saying that Pakistan and Pakistanis, “like to be treated with respect and the government of Russia and the people of Russia have been very respectful to the government and the people of Pakistan”.

    Bilawal Bhutto warns PM Abbasi on privatisation of PIA, Pakistan Steel




    Chairman Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has urged Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi to shelve attempts to privatise Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) and Pakistan Steel or or ‘be ready to face stiff resistance.’

    While presiding over a meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Privatisation (CCoP), PM Abbasi had approved a privatisation plan for both PIA and Pakistan Steel.
    Criticising Abbasi, the PPP chairman said that commoners and experts were taken aback by the decision of a man who led the PIA before he launched his own profit-making private airline.
    Likewise, he added, Nawaz Sharif has dragged the largest state industrial unit to a point of operational death.
    “Both PM Abbasi and the disqualified prime minister are conspiring to sell PIA and Pakistan Steel most probably to their undisclosed aides,” Bilawal said. “They are selling national assets on one hand and purchasing on the other.”
    The PPP chief also directed his party to raise voice against, what he called, fraudulent privatisation of the new organisations in the Parliament and other available forums.

    Video Report - ‘Only praised Rao Anwar’s valor during anti-MQM operation’: Zardari clears the air on ‘brave kid’ comment

    Former President Zardari retracts and regrets his remarks about Rao Anwar as mis-spoken

    Former President Asif Ali Zardari has regretted the remarks he made in interview with a private channel Friday that sought to give the impression of supporting the absconding former SSP Malir Rao Anwar.
    Spokesperson Senator Farhatullah Babar said that Mr. Asif Ali Zardari has described his words as mis-spoken and regretted any offence to anyone.
    The former President also acknowledged in another TV interview today that his words about Rao Anwar were indeed mis-spoken, the Spokesperson said..
    The former President has also denounced extra judicial killings as “abhorrent, criminal and unacceptable” and called for bringing to justice all those involved in it, the Spokesperson said.
    Enforced disappearances and extra judicial killings are twins of a deepening curse. It is unthinkable that the Pakistan People’s Party would support it in any form or manner, the Spokesperson said. The party’s record in and out of the parliament is a testimony to it.
    The former President realizes that his remarks made unwittingly in the flow of conversation may have caused anguish and has regretted it.

    رائو انوار سے متعلق اپنے ریمارکس پر افسوس ہے،زرداری

    سابق صدر اور پیپلز پارٹی کے شریک چیئرمین آصف زرداری نے رائو انوار سے متعلق اپنے ریمارکس پر اظہار افسوس کردیا ۔
    ایک بیان میں آصف زرداری نے کہا کہ سابق ایس ایس پی ملیر کے بارے میں ان کے منہ سے غلط الفاظ ادا ہوئے،جن پر افسوس ہے۔
    ان کا کہناتھاکہ ماورائے عدالت قتل گھناونا جرم ہے جس کی کوئی معافی نہیں،لوگوں کو جبری لاپتہ اور جعلی مقابلوں میں ہلاک کرنا قابلِ نفرت جرم ہے۔
    پیپلزپارٹی کے شریک چیئرمین کا یہ بھی کہناتھاکہ شہریوں کو غائب کرنا اور انہیں ماورائے عدالت قتل ایک جیسے جرائم ہیں،پی پی ایسے اقدامات کی حمایت کا سوچ بھی نہیں سکتی ۔
    سابق صدر نے کہا کہ ان کے رائو انوار سے متعلق ادا کئے گئے الفاظ سے کسی کو تکلیف پہنچی ہے تو وہ اس پر افسوس کا اظہار کرتے ہیں۔
    آصف زرداری نے حکومت کو خبردار کیا کہ وہ پر اسر ار انداز میں پی آئی اے کی نجکاری سے باز رہے،اس اقدام کا مقصد الیکشن سے قبل پیسے بنانا ہے،خریداروں کو بھی نتائج بھگتنا پڑیں گے۔
    انہوں نے مزید کہا کہ پارلیمنٹ کو قومی ائرلائن کی نجکاری سے بے خبر رکھنا جر م ہے۔

    https://jang.com.pk/latest/450145-asif-zardari-regrets-his-remarks-on-rao-anwar