Friday, November 24, 2017

Ivanka Trump And Chelsea Clinton Come To Malia Obama’s Defense Against The Tabloids




By Sara Boboltz
The young Obama’s private life “should be OFF limits.”

Former first daughter Malia Obama spent a good part of her adolescence in the national spotlight as her dad, you know, led the free world for eight years. For the better part of 2017, she’s been a private citizen.
But certain media outlets aren’t making it easy for her.
After two stories about the 19-year-old’s personal life appeared in tabloid and conservative media, voices from both ends of the political spectrum called for giving the young Obama her privacy.
“Malia Obama should be allowed the same privacy as her school aged peers,” Ivanka Trump tweeted on Friday. “She is a young adult and private citizen, and should be OFF limits.”
Chelsea Clinton, a persistent advocate for privacy when it comes to kids living in the White House, chimed in shortly afterward.
“Malia Obama’s private life, as a young woman, a college student, a private citizen, should not be your clickbait,” she wrote. “Be better.”
Since President Donald Trump’s family moved into the White House, Clinton has also been moved to call out media outlets that focus attention on Barron Trump, who is 11 years old. 
Leaked video published by the conservative site The Daily Caller and other outlets appeared to show Malia Obama smoking. Another video, published by TMZ along with still photos, showed her kissing someone during a tailgate party for the annual Harvard-Yale football game.
Tabloids claim to have identified the young man as a student at Harvard, where Obama has just begun her freshman year after taking time off following high school. She has expressed interest in pursuing a career in the film industry.
Noticing that Obama’s name was trending due to the gossip headlines, people on social media reacted with pointed jokes about the media’s choices and sober criticisms ― but mainly jokes. 

Video - This Man Uses 'Visually Provocative' Activism To Fight Racial Injustice

Video - Why This Beer Is Banned In 12 States

Video - How Alcohol Effects Our Emotions

Music Video - Luis Fonsi, Daddy Yankee - Despacito ft. Justin Bieber

Video Report - Energy Observer: The world's first hydrogen-powered boat

Video Report - Shields and Brooks on sexual misconduct plaguing politics, GOP tax plan pushback

Video Report - New GOP Sex Scandal As Republicans Grapple With Roy Moore | The Last Word | MSNBC

Video Report - When lions and people clash | DW English

Video Report - CrossTalk: Destroying Yemen

Video Report - CrossTalk: Ending Syria’s proxy war

Video Report - #Syria - 'Thank you, Russia, Thank you, Putin' - BBC News

Video Report - EGYPT MOSQUE TERROR ATTACK

Video Report - Egypt attack: More than 235 killed in Sinai mosque - BBC News

#Pakistan - ‘Chocolate Hero’ - Waheed Murad’s 34th death anniversary observed



The 34th death anniversary of the legendary Lollywood actor Waheed Murad was observed across the country on Thursday where his fans paid tribute to the late ‘Chocolate Hero’.
Waheed was not only an actor but a film producer and scriptwriter as well. He produced 11 films during his career and acted in 124 Urdu, Punjabi and Pashto films.
He stepped into the film industry in 1962 with the film Aulad in which he played a supporting role. He played a leading role in the film Heera aur Pathar which was released in 1964 and became the start of Waheed’s journey to success.
He was cast in Armaan in 1966 alongside Zeba, Nirala, Rozina and Zahoor Ahmed. The film became an instant hit and turned Waheed into a superstar. Armaan was the first Pakistani film to have spent 75 weeks in cinemas and became the first Platinum Jubilee film in the industry. Waheed received two Nigar Awards for his outstanding production and acting skills.
He was famous for his bold and charming acting style and ruled over the Pakistani film industry in the 60’s and 70’s during which he acted in numerous super hit films.
He died of cardiac arrest on November 23, 1983, and was awarded Sitara-e-Imtiaz, the third highest honour and civilian award, for his contributions to the Pakistani film industry.

#Pakistan - Coal Project to change the fate of Thar: Asif Ali Zardari

By: Zulfiqar Ali Bhatti
Coal Project to change the fate of Thar. It was stated by the former President of Pakistan and President PPPP Asif Ali Zardari while addressing a joint meeting of Pakistan Peoples Party office-bearers, Parliamentarians, Local Bodies heads, and notables from Tharparker and Umerkot districts was presided over by the former President of Pakistan and President PPPP at Bilawal House today evening. PPP Women Wing President MNA Faryal Talpur was also present on occasion.

Meeting was attended by President PPP Sindh Nisar Ahmed Khuhro, Syed Qaim Ali Shah, Home Minister Suhail Anwar Sial, Ziaul Hassan Lanjar, Member Central Executive Committee MNA Nawab Yousuf Talpur, PPP Mirpurkhas Division President Aftab Hussain Jillani, President PPP Tharparker Senator Gianchand, President PPP Umerkot Syed Ali Mardan Shah, Ministers Sardar Ali Shah, Special Assistant to Chief Minister Dr Khatumal Jeewan, Nawab Taimoor Talpur, MPAs, Party office-bearers, the elected Chairmen and Vice Chairmen of the District Councils, Municipal and Town Committees and notables from both districts.

PPP leaders from Tharparker and Umerkot apprised Asif Ali Zardari about the political landscape of both the districts and the development projects carried out by PPP government in their respective areas.

Addressing the Party leaders, former President Asif Ali Zardari said that both Tharparker and Umerkot districts will immensely benefit from Thar Coal Project, which is going to change the fate of every soul in the area. He said that Thar Coal Project was the dream of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto and hoped that it would be completed within schedule and start feeding coal-fired power to national grid by the end of 2019.

http://www.thesindhtimes.com/sindh/coal-project-change-fate-thar-asif-ali-zardari/

#Pakistan - #Saudiledcoalition: Defence minister asked not to make commitments without notifying Senate

Days before the formal launch of the Saudi-led coalition against terrorism, PPP Senator Farhatullah Babar on Friday asked the defence minister not to make any commitments in Riyadh without first notifying Senate.
The senator also demanded that the government take parliament into confidence regarding the terms of reference (TORs) of the 41-nation 'pan-Islamic' coalition.
A meeting of the defence ministers of its member states will mark the formal launch of the Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition on Sunday.
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has been the driving force behind the coalition, will inaugurate the meeting. which will be held in Riyadh to outline the coalition's strategy, governance, activities and future plans.
Pakistan was part of the initial list of 34 countries that had agreed to become part of the coalition. Former army chief Gen Raheel Sharif joined the alliance as its top commander in April this year after the government issued a no-objection certificate for the move.
Speaking during a discussion on issues of public importance, Babar recalled that the defence minister had assured the house that the terms of reference for participation in the alliance will be placed before the Senate before any decision was taken. Voicing his reservations regarding the coalition, Senator Babar recalled that parliament had questioned why the army chief had been sent to Riyadh before the TORs had been finalised.
"Why shouldn't the government take the Parliament into confidence before making a commitment to Saudi Arabia?" the senator asked.
The senator noted that the coalition encompasses four key areas: ideology, communications, counter-terrorism financing and military. He said that these areas, particularly ideology, present potential pitfalls and challenges with potential consequences for Pakistan.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1372609/saudi-led-coalition-defence-minister-asked-not-to-make-commitments-without-notifying-senate

#Balochistan - #Gwadar’s doctors skip duty leaving patients in pain



By: Suleman Hashim
District Headquarter Hospital, (DHQ) Gawadar is visited by more than three hundred patients daily for treatment, according to the record of the hospital. As there are not enough hospitals in the Makran region, therefore the load of patients increases as hundreds of people come here from distant areas as well.
By 1:30 in the afternoon, a majority of the doctors, including both male and female, had already gotten up from their seats leaving the patients unattended as there were still dozens of patients present inside the hospital.
Ilahi Bakhsh, a clerk at DHQ hospital, told Pak Voices, “A large number of patients come to the hospital between 9 am and 2 pm because of the increasing population of Gawadar.”
“After the GDA hospital has started its operation in Naya Abad, there is some relief in the patients’ load.”
But the shortage of doctors and staff will continue to cause inconvenience to the people coming to DHQ hospital. The medical superintendent Dr Abdul Latif of DHQ, hospital, Gwadar of the hospital explained that they had 18 doctors before but now only 5 doctors are left in the hospital as many have joined GDA hospital.
As the doctors call the day early than their duty hours, it leaves scores of patients in pain and misery. Only one doctor was present in his room of emergency ward who was struggling to deal with lots of patients.
Yasin Baloch, a lonely doctor present at the hospital in the afternoon, speaking to Pak Voices said, “As the residence is the biggest problem and rents are very high in Gwadar so most of the doctors are reluctant to come and settle in the port town.”
Shamshtoon Baksh, a female patient from a far rural area of Jiwani, almost 60 KM from Gwadar town, was searching for a doctor to get her reports checked. Speaking to PakVoices, she said,” I’ve come from Jiwani after paying RS 400 as a fare, but all the doctors have already left the hospital.”
She added, “If I go back without a checkup, it would not be possible to come again within a few days.” Talking about hospitals in Jiwani, she said, “There is neither any hospital nor any laboratory in our area, so we’ve no option but to come to Gwadar even for a minor treatment.”
On the other hand, she regretted that the condition of the Gwadar’s hospital was also far from satisfactory. Roof plasters were broken as well as there were cracks in walls. Neither there were any bed covers nor bed sheets were available.
Younis Hussain Baloch, a laboratory technician, was still available in his lab saying,” I’m waiting for patients to collect their lab reports,” adding that there is load shedding of electricity from 11 am to 1 pm daily, so reports are delayed except for some days when the generator is working.” Baloch told that most of the patients go back without their lab reports due to delay.
Rabia Baloch, another female patient, told PakVoices, “Doctors have prescribed the medicine that is very expensive outside but these are not provided by the hospital.”
She added, “I’ve come so that doctor could prescribe less expensive medicine, but there is no doctor available due to which I’ll have to come again.”

Hafiz Saeed’s Release Completes the Political Mainstreaming of Jihadists in Pakistan


Hafiz Saeed is a free citizen after a Lahore High Court review board refused to extend his detention. The Lashkar-e-Taiba (Let) and Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) chief was initially placed under house arrest on January 30 for three months, which was extended thereafter.
During the time that Saeed was detained, the proscribed JuD created a political offshoot, the Milli Muslim League (MML) to participate in the upcoming general elections. Before that, MML candidates Yaqoob Sheikh and Liaqat Ali Khan contested by-elections in NA-120 (Lahore) and NA-4 (Peshawar), despite the Election Commission of Pakistan not registering the party.
In the NA-120 by-election in September, Yaqoob Sheikh won 5,822 votes, which was instrumental in the 14,000 vote drop the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) saw in its electoral hub.
Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.
MML coupled with Tehreek Labaik Ya Rasool Allah (TLY), which is currently camped in the capital demanding death sentences for PML-N ministers and the complete dismissal of the Parliament, spearheaded the rise of Islamist parties that have simultaneously surfaced in recent months. The two parties have witnessed immediate electoral success in two high profile by-elections.
That these militant Islamist groups have the backing of the military establishment has not only been maintained by the ruling party, but has also been confirmed by retired Army generals.
While it is touted as a containment policy for rogue militant elements in the country, the main purpose for mainstreaming the jihadists is to politically dent the civilian government.
The PML-N, historically right-wing conservative, has continued to enjoy a major share of the Islamist vote – which is precisely what was taken away from them during the NA-120 by-election. Furthermore, with these jihadists on their heels – and eventually in the Parliament – any planned overtures toward improving relations with India would be curtailed as well.
Therefore, Hafiz Saeed’s release completes the political mainstreaming of jihadists in Pakistan, by ensuring that the prime suspect of the Mumbai attacks, and a UN designated terrorist, will now not only be able to streamline militant activities targeting India, he can now properly spearhead the MML and eye the Parliament next year.
Saeed’s release shows the dwindling power of the civilian government – increasingly under the pressure of radical Islamist groups – which has loudly maintained that the LeT and its chief are a “liability” that they’re struggling to get rid of.
It was a civil-military confrontation over Hafiz Saeed, led by Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, that resulted in the Dawn Leaks episode last year. Two senior ministers were sacked over the leak of details regarding the security meeting over Saeed, the veracity of which has been confirmed by developments over the next 12 months.
Saeed’s release has both symbolic and actual perils for the political parties gearing up for the 2018 elections. This is as firm a sign as any that anyone eying improved relations with India by putting the Kashmir conflict on the backburner will not be allowed to run the country. But, of course, with Saeed himself now free to plan electoral strategies there should be a tangible presence of jihad-mongers in the Parliament – a constant reminder of the fate of civilians that do not toe the lines on security and diplomacy.
Even so, there could’ve been a case to shun India and back militancy in Kashmir as a unified civil-military policy had there been any benefits at all for the Pakistani state. Notwithstanding the missed economic opportunitiesthat the perpetual confrontation with India ensures, these jihadists do not limit themselves to Kashmir and have actually collaborated with groups that have openly declared war against the Pakistani state.
Militant groups like Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM), affiliated with LeT under the United Jihad Council (UJC) umbrella, have actually worked in tandem with Sipahe-e-Sahaba and Lashkar-e-Jhagvi (LeJ), which are blatantly targeting the Shia population in Pakistan.
Furthermore, JuD itself has been affiliated with the Islamic State, with the Counter Terrorist Department busting a collaborating cell in Sialkot, near the Indo-Pak border.
The fact that the civilian government hosted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, orchestrated operations to cleanse South Punjab of JeM, and then took up Hafiz Saeed’s case internationally and with the military establishment, is at the very least a factor in why Nawaz Sharif is no longer the prime minister, while Saeed’s party could be contesting the elections next year.

Pakistan - US expresses 'deep concern' over Hafiz Saeed release




By



The US has expressed "deep concern" at the release of Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, the alleged mastermind of the 2008 attacks in the Indian city of Mumbai that killed more than 160 people, calling for him to be "arrested and charged for his crimes".
Saeed was released in the early hours of Friday in the eastern Pakistani city of Lahore, after a court rejected a government application to extend his detention under anti-terrorism laws, saying there was no evidence to support the application.
The Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) founder had been under house arrest since January.
"The United States is deeply concerned that Lashkar-e-Tayyaba (LeT) leader Hafiz Saeed has been released from house arrest in Pakistan," Heather Nauert, US state department spokesperson, said in an emailed statement.
"LeT is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organisation responsible for the death of hundreds of innocent civilians in terrorist attacks, including a number of American citizens. The Pakistani government should make sure that he is arrested and charged for his crimes." Saeed denies any involvement in the Mumbai attacks or connection to LeT, which has been blamed for a series of deadly attacks against Indian security forces and civilians, mostly in the disputed territory of Kashmir.
In 2012, the US placed a $10m bounty on his head for his alleged role in the Mumbai attacks.
Saeed says he now heads Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD), a charitable organisation. Both the UN and US have designated JuD as a front for LeT, and many of its leaders, including Saeed, remain subject to UN and other international sanctions. In 2002, Pakistan banned the LeT as a "terrorist" organisation, and, since 2008, authorities say they have been abiding by UN sanctions that subject JuD to an assets freeze, arms embargo, and international travel ban.
JuD, however, continues to operate freely across the country, and is often seen at the forefront of humanitarian relief efforts following natural disasters. It also runs a network of seminaries, and releases several periodical publications.
In August, the group launched a political party, taking part in a key by-election in Lahore.
Fiery Friday sermon
Addressing scores of supporters at midday prayers in Lahore on Friday, Saeed blamed his incarceration on Pakistan’s eastern neighbour, India.
He labelled Nawaz Sharif, who was recently removed as prime minister over corruption allegations, a "traitor" for pursuing peace with India.
Sharif’s PML-N party remains in government, and he was succeeded by Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, a party loyalist, in August.
India registered its protest shortly after Saeed’s release was ordered by the court. "India as indeed the entire international community is outraged that a self-confessed and UN proscribed terrorist is being allowed to walk free and continue with his evil agenda," Raveesh Kumar, Indian foreign ministry spokesperson, said on Thursday.
Kumar accused Pakistan of "shielding and supporting non-state actors". At the JuD headquarters in Lahore, Saeed was defiant, shaking hands with long lines of jubilant supporters who had gathered to welcome him after his release.
"I am very happy that no accusation against me has been proven that would detrimental to either myself or my country," he said in a video statement shared just after his release in which he pledged to continue fighting for the Kashmiri cause. "I am fighting for the Kashmiri people, and will continue to do so."
In response to the Indian criticism, Pakistan said the country remains committed to the implementation of UN Security Council 1267 sanctions regime. "Pakistan's resolve, actions and successes in the fight against terrorism, terrorist violence and terrorists is unmatched in the world," the Pakistan foreign office said in a statement.
"Pakistan condemns and opposes all forms of terrorism by any individual or group.
"Pakistan also opposes and condemns acts of terrorism inside Pakistan and elsewhere by India, which claims to be a champion of democracy, and international law."
India and Pakistan have fought two of their three wars since gaining independence from the British in 1947 over Kashmir, which both claim in full but administer separate parts of. India accuses Pakistan of supporting LeT and other armed groups that back the separatist movement in Indian-administered Kashmir. Pakistan denies any role in the separatist movement.

The Pakistani General Who Wouldn’t Go Away





Mohammed Hanif


Along stretches of highway and railway tracks across Pakistan, walls bear a familiar inscription: Mard kabhi boorha nahin hota, a man never grows old. It’s an advert by quacks and herbalists peddling eternal virility to aging Pakistani men. It would appear that Pakistan’s former military leader Gen. Pervez Musharraf has taken this roadside assurance too seriously.

Nine years after his ouster from the presidency, and many humiliating attempts to reclaim political relevance later, he is at it again. In a recent interview with Sky News, he said that if he could return to power now he would have more legitimacy than the first time around because back then some people thought he was a dictator. He said this with a straight face.
Musharraf’s dreams are as hopeless as the claims of the roadside quacks, but that doesn’t stop him from coming up with elaborate plans to bring them about. Despite what the aphrodisiac sellers say, men do get old, and they don’t get any wiser with age.
Back in his day, Musharraf sold himself to the world as the last man standing between the Taliban and Western civilization. In the bargain, he achieved everything that a developing country’s military dictator could want: a trip to Camp David, a house in Dubai, a flat in central London, a book deal, his own TV show. You would think that after all that, he would retire, play golf and occasionally show up on the after-dinner lecture circuit. But earlier this month he announced the creation of a 23-party political alliance and appointed himself its chairman.
Many of those parties were previously unheard-of, and some of the ones that were known announced that they had nothing to do with Musharraf or his grand alliance. Still, within days Musharraf was back on TV reminiscing about his glorious rule and pitching himself as a savior-in-waiting — the man who would deliver Pakistan from its current political crisis, caused by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s disqualification from office on corruption charges.
Other Pakistani army chiefs have found lucrative post-retirement employment. The last one to go, Gen. Raheel Sharif, is now the head of a new Saudi-led military coalition of mostly Sunni states that is being billed as a Muslim NATO. The one before that, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, managed to wrangle a three-year extension of service and now appears to be leading a quiet life — which may have something to do with the fact that his brother is wanted in a land scam worth 17 billion rupees (more than $161 million) that he ran for the army while Kayani was army chief. But Musharraf, having tasted absolute power for almost a decade, won’t give up.
There’s a slight problem, though. He wants to rule a country that he has refused to return to since leaving it last year. He is an absconder in multiple court cases, some involving charges of murder and treason. And there is his record as president of Pakistan.
From 1999, when he seized power from the then prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, to 2008, when he resigned to avoid being impeached, this man was responsible for the fate of the nation and an army at least half-a-million-soldiers strong that was standing at the forefront of an existential battle against terrorists. A pistol in one hand, a cigar in the other, he was a man’s man. In the late 1990s, he sent several hundred Pakistanis to their slaughter against Indian forces in the Siachen area of Kashmir, and even after being called out for that blunder expressed largely self-pity. His staunchest political enemy, Benazir Bhutto, was assassinated on his watch and he blamed her for her own death. He once claimed that Pakistani women get themselves raped to obtain Canadian visas, and then laughed at his joke.
You don’t have to be a military dictator or the head of the army to feel entitled to power in Pakistan. There are mini-Musharrafs all around us. More than 1,000 women were killed in Pakistan last year, many of them shot or hacked or poisoned by male relatives. They were killed by their fathers and brothers and husbands and jilted lovers, whose violence is legitimized by Pakistani society and law.
Two male legislators have been squabbling over the fact that, in a village in their constituency in northern Pakistan, armed men stripped a 16-year-old girl and paraded her naked in the streets because of a family dispute. In the southern city of Karachi, Pakistan’s most famous TV evangelist accused journalists and bloggers of committing blasphemy or treason, hence endangering their lives, and said he had been told to do so by his bosses. Another man, a cleric in a wheelchair, is leading a siege of the capital Islamabad because he believes that religious minorities in Pakistan are having too good a time. Like Musharraf, these men know they’ll get away with all this. Both the legislator who is accused of supporting the men who paraded the girl naked and his accuser will get another shot at elections because the political party they belong to is a male club. The TV presenter will move to another show and may even get a more lucrative contract. When the cleric’s siege is over, he will find other platforms to harass other minorities. All are protected by institutions or cabals of men like them.
Three years ago, Musharraf was on trial in more than a dozen cases. He was on his way to court for a hearing when his convoy was diverted to a military hospital. He then managed to stay away from a courtroom until the army and its intelligence operatives secured him bail in all the cases and in 2016 bundled him out of the country. Later, he boasted that General Sharif had helped him get out.
When Musharraf was in power in Islamabad there was a joke going around: What’s the difference between Musharraf and God? God doesn’t think he is Musharraf.
And who can blame him?