Saturday, June 10, 2017

Pakistan - Former President Zardari condemns CM Punjab’s remarks against Supreme Court






Former President Asif Ali Zardari has condemned the statement of Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif accusing the Supreme Court of partiality and discrimination and holding only the Sharif  family accountable as “irresponsible, contemptuous and unacceptable” and demanded that Shahbaz withdraw and apologize his unwarranted and provocative remarks.

“It is shocking that from the picture of Hussain Nawaz appearing before JIT Shahbaz Sharif should have concluded that the Supreme Court was aiming only at the Sharif family”, he said in a statement today.

Those who bemoan that “this child was made to sit there” would do well to recall how the twice elected Prime Minister Shaheed Benazir would sit on brick piles outside jails with small children in her arms
seeking justice. The PPP then did not accuse the Supreme Court for training guns on the Party, he said.

Even when Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was assassinated through abuse of judicial processes it never said that the Supreme Court had trained
its guns on the Party.

The rulers should also recall the inhuman brutalities inflicted on their political opponents in the name of investigations in cooked up politically motivated cases that eventually did not stand judicial scrutiny and the accused were set free..

The PPP believes in across the board accountability of all but at the same time it will not permit subverting the lawful investigative and judicial processes to escape accountability, he said.

Zardari also urged members of the bars and the legal fraternity to take notice of the Chief Minister’s threatening and derogatory remarks.


https://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/2017/06/09/zardari-condemns-cm-punjabs-remarks-against-supreme-court/

Pakistan - Failure of #PMLN — the four-year report








It is now four years since the PML-N won the last election and time to look at a report card with the party manifesto as the baseline — and the results are unsatisfactory. Viewed with hindsight the manifesto was boldly reformist. There was evidence that the party was looking beyond a single term and had done the preparatory work, setting up — allegedly — sub-committees across a range of sectors that would put the detail on cost estimates for the agenda post to the projected 2018 victory. Periodic reviews of progress were planned. And very little has actually materialised. There have been no periodic reports and, looking closer, not much progress on key reforms either.
Top of the list of failures come the reforms of the civil service, a ‘transformation’ of public service. The proposed package of 24 reforms was never once considered by the cabinet. Also up for a shake-up were state owned enterprises which haemorrhage money by the billion every month. They for the most part remain as liabilities rather than assets. Police reforms were on the list, particularly their depoliticisation. If the shenanigans in Sindh regarding the upper echelons of the police are anything to go by that has gone out of the window as well. There was a promise to raise the tax-to-GDP ratio to 15 per cent by 2018. Today it is below 11 per cent. Tax collection per capita of the population has gone down. Education — funding overall reduced. Corruption and accountability — a zero-tolerance was announced as was the formation of a National Accountability Commission. Which never happened.
The list of failings to meet advertised targets goes on. To be scrupulously fair the government did work on some reforms in the justice system but these ran into the sand as well, killed off by inertia. Seasoned watchers of politics know that party manifestos are often little more than wish-lists and there is little expectation that they will be fulfilled in total or in part. That said the PML-N came to power on a platform of reform and four years in there is precious little reform to be seen. ‘Do better next time’ is at the bottom of the report card.

The West Asian volcano - by Afrasiab Khattak





By Afrasiab Khattak


Eruption of the West Asian political volcano, though expected due to the political heat accumulating over the last few years due to deepening political rivalries in the region, stunned political observers across the world when it materialised.
The two spectacular terrorist attacks in Tehran last Wednesday that took place simultaneously at the Iranian Parliament and the Tomb of Ayutollah Rohullah Khomeini, the two most important symbols of the Islamic Republic, were earthshaking for many reasons. One, in a decade these were the first major terror attacks inside Iran leading to loss of precious lives in a country that was regarded to be an island of stability (albeit an oppressive and authoritarian one) in an unstable and chaotic region. The Islamic Republic of Iran that represents the rise of a new Persian Empire isn’t immune to the terror problem after all. Two, it seemed quite dramatic coming soon after the public pronouncement of Mohammad bin Salman, Saudi Deputy Crown Prince and Defense Minister, that KSA wouldn’t wait for Iran to bring the war into her territory and she would like to fight it inside Iran. Now the terrorist attack coming so soon after these ominous pronouncements may be pure coincidence but it isn’t possible to detach it from the rhetoric of the Saudi prince. Three, the summits held in Riyadh on 20-21 May provided a backdrop to the Tehran terror attacks that makes it quite easy for the Iranian ruling elites to sell it as a grand international conspiracy against the Islamic Republic. These were the US-Saudi summit, US-Gulf Cooperation Council Summit and Arab-Islamic-US summit. The Arab-Islamic-US summit conference endorsed the so-called Muslim Military Alliance ostensibly formed against terrorism, but which for all practical purposes is an anti-Iran and anti Shia military alliance. Four, the political and physical quarantining of Qatar by KSA, UAE, Bahrain and Egypt just before these attacks had already raised the political temperature to a dangerous level. Any knee jerk reaction by a nervous player can ignite a catastrophic war in West Asia under such volatile conditions.
Before coming to the new configurations, alignments, trends and possible scenarios it would be useful to briefly touch upon the context. The present political map of the Middle East was drawn by the victorious western powers just after the defeat and dissolution of the Ottoman Empire in the First World War. The same was retained by and large in the post Second World War political settlement in the region when the British political and military presence was replaced by the US one. The region acquired immense strategic importance during the Cold War as not only the origin of the three most important world religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam but also the largest source of fossil energy on the planet. The Baghdad Pact later renamed the Central Treaty Organization (CENTO) epitomised the western vision for the region as an anti-communist front. The perpetual western supported Israeli expansionism kept the region in continuous turmoil. Progressive Arab nationalism represented by Gamal Abdul Nasir and Ba’ath Party in the 6/7 decades of the 20th century faced continued decline after military defeats and western pressure paving ground for the domination of conservative Arab monarchies and sheikhdoms. Iran emerged as an active player, in fact a more assertive one, after the Islamic Revolution of 1979 creating insecurity among Arab monarchies and sheikhdoms. Consequently the sectarian divide between Sunni and Shia Muslims deepened as never before.
The weakening interest and control of western powers in general and the US in particular in the second decade of 20th century led to a psychological political “vacuum” that attracted new activism on the part of regional and international players. Iran and a Turkey, representing the aspirations of the Persian and Ottoman empires jumped at the opportunity. Both supported the so-called Arab Spring as the turmoil generated by the later could create space for their new hegemony. The political and sectarian upheavals in Lebanon, Iraq and Syria created conducive conditions for not only the expansion of the Iranian political influence in these countries but also for her military ingress. Turkey sided with the political forces of Arab Spring and was able to expand her politico military influence from Tunisia to the Arab Gulf. By establishing a military base in Qatar, not even deterred by quarantining of Qatar by the more important Arab countries, Turkey has made clear her interest in the new settlement of the Middle East. It is particularly so as her prospects for joining the European Union aren’t as bright as they looked few years ago. Some ambitious young leaders of Arab monarchies are making an effort to create an “Arab Axis” by creating the Sunni military alliance, but their prospects don’t appear to be very bright. Israel is also, for all practical purposes, an undeclared ally of the Arab monarchies against Iran for obvious reasons.
By inducting her military forces in Syria, Russia has declared her intention to fill the possible vacuum created by the western retreat from the Middle East. After all, West Asia is an important part of the Russian centric Eurasian Heartland that Russia under Putin is so obsessed with. China’s OBOR has elaborate provisions for expanding Chinese influence into West Asia but she would prefer projection of soft power to achieve this goal. Although it isn’t totally oblivious to the strategic imperatives of the situation and is looking forward to using the Gwadar port in the Indian Ocean close to the Gulf for both trade and strategic purposes.
Pakistan is too close to the West Asian political volcano to escape its earthquakes. Deft handling of this complex and explosive situation will require a lot of political wisdom and strategic sagacity. But if past experience is anything to go by, this is the least available characteristic in the military-dominated Pakistani ruling elite. The way the country’s political and military leadership has jumped at the bandwagon of the KSA-led sectarian military alliance in violation of the parliament’s resolution doesn’t augur well for the future of the country in general and Balochistan in particular. The temptation of becoming a front-line-state once again is too strong to be resisted by an army that has been part of big power wars and conflicts in colonial and post-colonial existence. But getting sucked into the West Asian political and military conflict can create hell for Balochistan. The province is already bedeviled by insurgency and military operations, and can become another FATA. Injecting Sunni extremism with Arab money can be tempting but disastrous, opening the floodgates for the internationalisation of the Baloch problem.

First ever death penalty for blasphemy on social media in Pakistan

An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) on Saturday sentenced a man to death for sharing offensive content about Islam on social media, in a first ever penalty over online blasphemy.
Bahawalpur’s ATC Judge Shabir Ahmed announced the sentence for the 30-year-old accused, who belongs to the Shia community, the Dawn reported.
The accused, who hails from Lahore, had allegedly posted derogatory content about prominent Sunni religious figures and wives of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) on Facebook.
He was arrested last year from Bahawalpur by the Counter Terrorism Department (CTD).
Pakistan is cracking down against blasphemy related crimes on social media with the Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar threatening to block all social media websites with ‘blasphemous content’ earlier this year.
This is the harshest sentences among other cyber-crime related punishments handed down so far in the country.
Blasphemy has been a contentious issue in the country where people have been murdered over allegations of blasphemy. Earlier this year, a mob in Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan beat up a student, Mashal Khan, to death after accusing him of blasphemy over social media.
https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/headline/first-ever-death-penalty-for-blasphemy-on-social-media-in-pakistan/

Pakistani Court Issues Death Sentence For 'Blasphemous' Facebook Post

An antiterrorism court in Pakistan on June 10 sentenced a Shi’ite man to death for posting information on Facebook that the court deemed as blasphemous.
The sentence against 30-year-old Taimoor Raza was announced by Judge Shabbir Ahmed in Bahawalpur in eastern Punjab Province.
The court ruled that Raza posted derogatory content on Facebook in 2016 about Sunni Muslim religious leaders and the wives of the Prophet Muhammad.
Pakistan is a predominantly Sunni Muslim country. A rivalry between Shi’a and Sunni Muslims dates back to the seventh century when they had a disagreement about who should be the heir to Islam's Prophet Muhammad.
Under harsh blasphemy laws in Pakistan, the death sentence can be issued against anyone accused of insulting God, Islam, or religious personalities.
Human Rights Watch says Pakistan in 2016 arrested 10 Muslims and five non-Muslims on blasphemy charges.
Rights groups say Pakistan’s blasphemy laws often are abused in order to settle personal vendettas.

https://www.rferl.org/a/pakistan-blasphemy-facebook-death-sentence-raza/28539830.html

Thursday, June 8, 2017

Pakistan - ''Curbs needed against Afghan Taliban fundraising''





Reports have emerged that the Taliban and other militant groups, those fighting in Afghanistan, have re-commenced raising funds in Balochistan. Media reports that leaflets have been distributed in mosques calling on fellow citizens to donate to the Jihad in Afghanistan. Ironically, this comes in the wake of Pakistan’s National Action Plan, which had called for the choking of terrorism financing as well as the monitoring of donations made to militant groups. This also comes at a time when Pakistan is under scrutiny by an inter-governmental watchdog on terrorism financing. This is a clear violation of Pakistan’s stated counter-terrorism policy.
Balochistan, the most-sensitive of Pakistan’s provinces in terms of violence and unrest, has become a second home to the Afghan Taliban leadership. If media reports are accurate — then the Afghan Taliban have been convening in Balochistan for years to choose their new leader and formulate strategies. It is said that because of on-going conflict in Afghanistan, Islamabad looks the other way while the Afghan Taliban maintain their presence in Balochistan. However, Pakistan needs to a draw a red-line. The Afghan Taliban cannot continue using Pakistan’s soil to raise funds supporting the latter’s fight in Afghanistan. This has negative repercussions on Pakistan’s diplomacy and society.
After a long-drawn fight against militancy — Pakistan has evolved a national consensus against it. This country’s national narrative is that it supports peace and stability in Afghanistan. Pakistan’s state position is that it abhors terrorism in all its forms and manifestations and will not provide its soil for any foreign group to launch strikes against neighbouring countries. Allowing the Afghan Taliban to raise finances undermines the national narrative. It undercuts Pakistan’s state policy objectives and the national effort. Let us hope that both Parliament and the cabinet take up this issue, thereby ending our doublespeak.

PPP will stand by the Constitutional institutions in case of any confrontation with government: Bilawal Bhutto

Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has made it clear that his Party will stand by the Constitutional institutions in case of any confrontation with government warning any collision with institutions will be dangerous for both democracy and the country.
In a statement issued here, the PPP Chairman said there will be stiff resistance against PML-N and in favour of institutions in case of any conflict.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari pointed out that these institutions were built with the sacrifices of our leadership and nobody will be allowed to sacrifice these constitutional institutions for his family. “Our leadership suffered judicial murders and we took dead bodies but we never indulged in confrontations with the institutions,” he said adding that “we sacrificed our Prime Ministers and elected governments still we accepted decisions of the institutions.”
PPP Chairman further said that we sacrificed even our Party offices before the court decisions adding that Nawaz government should not remain in misunderstanding that we will allow anyone to jump into confrontation with the institutions.
“Takht-e-Raiwind should forget that they will sacrifice the institutions for the sake of its family and we will remain silent,” Bilawal Bhutto Zardari added.
The PPP Chairman pledged that we stand by country’s constitutional institutions and wont allow Nawaz Sharif to repeat his past adding that people will stand like rock against Takht-e-Raiwind if it attempted to  degrade or insult the institutions.

https://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/2017/06/08/ppp-will-stand-by-the-constitutional-institutions-in-case-of-any-confrontation-with-government-bilawal-bhutto/

Different delegations called on Chairman Bilawal Bhutto and joined PPP

Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party Bilawal Bhutto Zardari held meetings with different delegations, including politicians from PTI and other groups who joined PPP before him at Gilani House Multan today.
Those joined the PPP today include former MPA Malik Abbas Raan, Malik Hassan Raan and Malik Arshad Raan also ex-MPA, former MNA Syed Tanveer Shah, former President PTI Bahawalpur Nausheen, and independent political leaders from Layyah Syed Rifaqat Gilani and Pir Fazal Hussain Shah.
Former Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, President PPP South Punjab Makhdoom Ahmed Mahmood, General Secretary Natasha Doultana, former Federal Minister Makhdoom Shahabuddin, Hyder Zaman Qureshi, Shaukat Basra and other Party leaders were also present on the occasion.
Talking to them, Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari welcomed those joining the Party and assured them that PPP would utilize their full potential for serving the masses pull out them from the problems heaped on them by PML-N government. He said that PPP was aware about the injustices being committed to the farmers of South Punjab and in Central Punjab . The issues being faced by the cotton ginners should be taken seriously as country’s economy is based on agriculture, he added.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari pledged that PPP will revive the agriculture economy and its positive growth again after coming into power.


 https://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/

Islamic State says it killed two Chinese teachers kidnapped in Pakistan




Islamic State has killed two Chinese teachers it kidnapped in Pakistan's southwestern Baluchistan province last month, the militant group's Amaq news agency said on Thursday, in a blow to Islamabad's efforts to safeguard Chinese workers.
Armed men pretending to be policemen kidnapped the two language teachers in the provincial capital, Quetta, on May 24. The kidnapping was a rare security incident involving Chinese nationals in Pakistan, where Beijing has pledged $57 billion for its "Belt and Road" plan.
"Islamic State fighters killed two Chinese people they had been holding in Baluchistan province, southwest Pakistan," Amaq said.
A Baluchistan government spokesman said officials were in the process of confirming "whether the report is true".
China's embassy in Pakistan could not be reached and there was no immediate comment from Pakistan's interior ministry or its foreign office.
Islamic State, which controls some territory in neighbouring Afghanistan, has struggled to establish a presence in Pakistan. But it has claimed several major attacks, including one on the deputy chairman of the Senate last month in Baluchistan, in which 25 people were killed.
Earlier on Thursday, Pakistan's military published details of a three-day raid on an militant hideout in a cave not far from Quetta, saying it had killed 12 "hardcore terrorists" from a banned local Islamist group and prevented Islamic State from gaining a "foothold" in Baluchistan.
China's ambassador to Pakistan and other officials have often urged Islamabad to improve security, especially in Baluchistan, where China is building a new port and funding roads to link its western regions with the Arabian Sea.

To escape abusive marriages, many Christians in Pakistan convert to Islam





By Naila Inayat

For a Pakistani Christian like Shameela Masih, divorcing her abusive husband meant two choices — both nearly as bad as staying in the marriage.
“I have to prove adultery allegations against him,” said Masih, a 34-year-old mother of two. “The other option I have is to convert to Islam.” Masih recently filed for divorce from a husband she said “frequently beats me up” and a mother-in-law who she said burned her leg with coal.
But under the majority-Muslim country’s laws, she must produce a witness who would testify to committing adultery with her husband. As a result, she’s now reluctantly planning to renounce her faith.
“Converting is the easiest way out,” she said. “My family tells me that they will disown me as a Muslim, but I don’t have a choice.”
Masih is one of thousands of Christians in Pakistan who have converted to Islam to divorce their spouses under laws stemming from the British colonial period, when traditional morals held sway.
Now Pakistani officials are considering revising the law to make it easier for couples to part ways.
“There are so many things in the existing 19th-century Christian Marriage Act that need to be revised and updated to stop the exploitation of people and protect the human rights,” said Kamran Michael, the federal minister for human rights who is spearheading the drive for the legislation.
The law grants divorces to Christian couples on four grounds: adultery, conversion, marriage to another or cruelty. But proving adultery or cruelty is tough, especially in Pakistan, where adultery is a crime, and the stigma against domestic violence is weak in many parts of the country. Christians comprise less than 2 percent of Pakistan’s population of 189 million.
Muslims, on the other hand, can easily obtain a divorce for a variety of reasons, including irreconcilable differences.
Formerly, Pakistan’s laws on divorce mirrored those in Britain. But in the early 1980s, then-military dictator Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq restored older laws from the colonial period that applied to Christians divorcing. For Muslims, he left revised laws from the 1960s intact.
“The current law on Christian divorce undermines the dignity of women,” said Fauzia Viqar, who chairs the Punjab Commission on the Status of Women. “Many Christian women are left in marriages where they are suffering cruelty by husbands without any relief from the state.”
The law also puts needless stress on couples, said would-be divorcees.
“I want to divorce my wife amicably without charging her of adultery,” said Emanuel Anthony, 29, a Christian street vendor in Lahore who has been married for five years. “She is the mother of my child. Why should I assassinate her character in public?”
His wife, Nabila, agreed.
“We have been separated for a year now. There is an understanding between us that we are not compatible and want different things from life,” said the 25-year-old Christian who teaches mathematics at a Catholic school. “I don’t understand what the issue is, and why a law should govern my right to divorce.” Slated to be unveiled in Parliament in the coming weeks, the new law would expand the grounds for divorce and separate it from the Christian religion. Couples would be able to marry by registering with the government and then solemnizing their nuptials in the church if they so choose, said human rights ministry officials. “Pakistani Christian couples would be able to divorce amicably without hurtling adultery accusations or converting to another religion,” said Haroon Sulaiman, a family lawyer in Lahore. “This will give the persecuted minority some relief.”
The Catholic Church opposed the changes.
“Marriage is a lifelong and indissoluble union for better or for worse in Christianity – you cannot just amend the laws of God,” said Catholic Bishop James Mathew. “Marriage is a sacrament, not a contract. This change is to defame our religion. Supporting the changes is like going against the Bible.”
Masih said Christian leaders like Mathew can overlook her and other women because they weren’t married. “No one cares about us, we are left at the mercy of the Muslims and Christians alike,” she said. “Once in power, they don’t do anything for us. The Christian leaders are more worried about church politics instead of helping poor people like us.”

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

Music Video - Kathy Perry - Bon Appétit.The Voice,France @jun 03, 2017

Video Report - How disruptive is the Qatar crisis for the middle east?

Video Report - #Saudi move against #Qatar is a Game-of-Thrones style power play

Video Report - Inside Story - What's behind the diplomatic breakdown in the Gulf?

Video Report - CrossTalk: Targeting Qatar

''Kal bi bhutto Zinda tha Ajj bi Bhutto Zinda hai''

Video Report - Bilawal Bhutto addressing Nooriabad Power Plant inauguration ceremony

May 31, 2017

Video Report - Bilawal Bhutto Speech at Cm House Iftar Party - June 3rd,2017

Video Report - Bilawal Bhutto Speech 3 June 2017 Demanding Nawaz Sharif Resignation From PM Seat

Video Report - Bilawal Bhutto once again lashes out PM nawaz

Pakistan - Bilawal Bhutto condemns terrorism incidents in Iran

Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has condemned terrorist attacks on Iranian Parliament and the mausoleum of Imam Khomeini, in which 12 precious human lives were lost.
In a press statement issued here, the PPP Chairman said that these terrorist attacks were threats to peace in the entire region and expressed solidarity with the families of victims and the people of Iran.
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said PPP condemns terrorism in any country and stressed for joint efforts against terrorism in the region.

https://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/2017/06/07/bilawal-bhutto-condemns-terrorism-incidents-in-iran/

China to set up military bases in Pakistan – Pentagon report



Benjamin Haas
Beijing’s global military ambitions are growing, the annual report says, as the nation seeks to counter American primacy.
China is set to expand its military capabilities across the globe, with new overseas bases in countries like Pakistan as the world’s largest army seeks an increased role in defending China’s interest abroad, a report by the Pentagon has said.
China’s spent $180bn on the People’s Liberation Army last year, according to the annual report from the US defence department, but officials admitted that figure could not account for all spending due to “poor accounting transparency”. That estimate is significantly higher than China’s official defense budget of about $140bn.
“China most likely will seek to establish additional military bases in countries with which it has a longstanding friendly relationship and similar strategic interests, such as Pakistan,” the report said.
“This initiative, along with regular naval vessel visits to foreign ports, both reflects and amplifies China’s growing influence, extending the reach of its armed forces.”
Last year China began building its first overseas base in the African nation of Djibouti, already home to Camp Lemonnier, a large US instillation responsible for counter terrorism operations in the Persian Gulf and east and north Africa.
The new base is frequently cited in the Pentagon report along with wider ambitions for additional installations. Pakistan was singled out as a likely location and it is already the largest buyer of Chinese-made arms.
“China wants the capability to negate American primacy in the region, and after that to become the strongest military in the region,” said Sam Roggeveen, a China military expert at the Lowy Institute for International Policy.
“For now China’s ambitions remain regional, but it is becoming clear China has broader global aspirations, and while they are still in the early stages, they beginning to take shape.”
China has become increasingly assertive militarily in recent years, especially in territorial disputes in the East and South China Seas, where it frequently challenges US warships and planes. Military expansion overseas also ties into a $900bn infrastructure initiative championed by president Xi Jinping to create a new Silk Road, with some of the planned projects in unstable regions like Afghanistan and Pakistan.
But some say the plans are a natural extension of China’s desire to be more involved in international security.
“With China’s interests expanding globally, China needs limited but necessary defense facilities in foreign countries,” said Zhu Feng, an international security professor at Nanjing University. As China’s military expands abroad, Zhu said the greatest challenge would be cooperation and communication with international community.
He also decried the West’s “double standards” with regard to China’s ambitions, saying fears were unfounded.
The installation in Djibouti “is not a military base, it’s a military supply base. The characterisation is wrong,” Zhu added, echoing Chinese government language that seeks to play down the scope of the facility.
“China may build similar supply bases overseas when necessary.”
China already has the largest navy in the Pacific, the Pentagon report said with more than 300 ships. But China still lags behind the US and Japan in terms of technology and capability.
In a break with previous assessments, the US defense department did not record a significant increase in reclaimed land centered on disputed islands in the South China Sea. China previously poured sand into the ocean to create 3,200 acres (1,300 hectares) around seven rocks and reef in the spratly islands, according to the report.
Three of the man-made islands have airfields and will be capable of supporting three regiments of fighters once it finishes construction of “24 fighter-sized hangars, fixed-weapons positions, barracks, administration buildings, and communication facilities at each of the three outposts”.
Despite the prospect of airbases in the South China Sea, which have been called “unsinkable aircraft carriers”, it remains to be seen if China can maintain squadrons so far from the mainland for extended periods of time, Roggeveen said.
The deployment of fighters won’t escalate regional tension, Zhu said. “It is a very limited but necessary defense facility,” he added, saying US warships in the region were to blame for escalating tensions.

Pakistan has no plans to cut diplomatic ties with Qatar

Pakistan has no immediate plans to cut diplomatic ties with Qatar, a spokesman for the South Asian nation's foreign ministry said on Monday.
The country "has no such plans," the spokesman, Nafees Zakaria, said, following Monday's surprise severing of ties with Qatar by Islamabad's key ally, Saudi Arabia, and three other Middle East nations.
"At the moment there is nothing on Qatar issue, (we) will issue a statement if some development takes place," Zakaria said.

http://www.khaleejtimes.com/international/pakistan/pakistan-has-no-plans-to-cut-diplomatic-ties-with-qatar

The Qatar Crisis: A Diplomatic Curveball for Pakistan

Following the ongoing row that has seen Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen, and even the Maldives formally sever their ties with Qatar, Pakistan has found itself in an unlikely diplomatic fix.
It was only a couple of weeks ago that Pakistan was conspicuously shunned at the Riyadh summit, prompting rumors that former Army Chief Raheel Sharif would pull out of the Saudi-led Islamic military alliance that he commands. To address the growing criticism at home, Islamabad even suggested that its participation in the Saudi-led alliance wasn’t final yet, citing anti-Iran rhetoric and the ensuing sectarian tinges of the coalition, as the concern. But there’s little doubt that it was the humiliation jointly orchestrated by the United States and Saudi Arabia that pushed a rethink – or at least a façade thereof.
It is hard to imagine Islamabad not being cognizant that the Saudi coalition is, for all intents and purposes, is a Salafi NATO designed to counter the “Shia Crescent” spearheaded by Iran.” But after finally acquiescing to compromising ties with Tehran, in exchange for the Saudi petrodollars, Islamabad now faces another stiff question, at the most inopportune of moments.
The existence of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) means that Pakistan, like the rest of the world, has treated all member countries as an extension of Saudi Arabia. Unlike relations with Iran, which have always had the sword of Saudi-exacted opportunity cost hanging over them, any agreements with other GCC states have been negotiated and signed without any such considerations.
But now with a potentially prolonged Saudi-Qatar rift, Pakistan might have to face a dreaded choice sooner rather than later. The answer would have severe ramifications for Islamabad, especially vis-à-vis the multipronged security and energy crises that the country finds itself in.
Last year Pakistan signed a 15-year gas supply agreement with Qatar. Islamabad would import 3.75 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) annually and add 2,000 megawatts of power to the national grid. Not only was the agreement with Qatargas-2 – the largest LNG producer globally – going to singlehandedly almost halve the country’s electricity shortfall and amount for over 85 percent of Pakistan’s LNG import capacity, it also diversifies Pakistan’s energy mix.
In addition, it was only last month that Qatar formally expressed interest in $1.5 billion Karachi-Lahore LNG pipeline project to supply gas to Punjab. Doha was set to ward off Moscow’s interest in the project after the deal was verbally agreed with Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani during his visit to Pakistan in January this year.
In terms of security, Saudi Arabia earmarking another enemy in the region would mean additional demand for Pakistani troops. At a time when the state is still far from shoring up its defense against local jihadist groups, adding another conflict to be militarily involved in would smack of skewed priorities, and further underscore Riyadh’s clout over Islamabad.
Furthermore, with the Islamic Military Alliance already self-manifesting as a sham, a fellow member state being sidelined would reaffirm the coalition as an assimilation of al-Saud’s personal security force – especially with another member state, Yemen, being relentlessly bombed.
Pakistan, which is already surrounded by a hostile neighborhood accusing it of harboring terrorism and in turn threatening attacks inside its territory, can ill-afford the rupture of ties with another state in the Middle East. The conundrum would multiply for Pakistan if, in addition to Iran, Qatar draws closer to Turkey as it looks for outlets to bridge the economic gap that severing ties with the Gulf neighbors would cause. Ankara has supported Islamabad on multiple fronts in recent times.
For Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who has been instrumental in establishing Pakistan’s ties with Turkey, the timing of the Qatar crisis could not have been worse. With the Qatari royal family vying to bail the Sharif family out in the ongoing investigation over the Panama Papers corruption scandal, Sharif cannot distance himself from Doha, especially with the 2018 general elections less a year away.
On the other hand, more than Iran, Turkey, Qatar, or any other state, Nawaz Sharif is personally indebted to Saudi Arabia for saving his life during the Musharraf regime, as the then-deposed prime minister found a safe space for exile in the Kingdom.
With the interests of the civilian government and the military establishment, which enjoys a significant share of Saudi funding, aligning with Riyadh, it’s hard to imagine Islamabad doing anything that would be interpreted as support for Doha. Pakistan would hence look to stretch out its neutrality over the conflict for as long as possible, and avoid doing anything that could be interpreted by the al-Saud family as support for Qatar.
What could further complicate matters for Islamabad is if China, after maintaining neutrality in most regional feuds, is pushed into picking sides in the conflict, especially if Washington allies with Riyadh as expected. For Islamabad, finding China and Saudi in opposing alliances would be an unprecedented nightmare that would officially sound the death knell for its foreign policy rulebook.
There’s a lot more than power supply and state security at stake for Pakistan.

Nuclear Pakistan Sees the Saudi Game Against Qatar and Iran and Says, ‘No, Thanks’



By LAWRENCE PINTAK


With the Arabs lashing out at each other—a family feud on steroids—nuclear-armed Pakistan is happy to back away from the coming fight with Iran.
The wheels are already coming off Donald Trump’s grand Muslim anti-terror coalition and there is a quiet sigh of relief here in the Pakistani capital.
It all appeared so simple when viewed from the glittering palaces of Trump’s Riyadh summit. The U.S., Saudi Arabia and dozens of other Muslims nations versus Iran in a “battle between good and evil” that will “destroy the terror that threatens the world.” It’s nice when a solution to global conflict fits in 140 characters. Now the thin veneer of unity has been torn asunder with the announcement that Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies are severing diplomatic relations with neighbor Qatar, a card-carrying member of the putative anti-terror coalition, and cutting off all land, air and sea ties. “This decisive decision” was being taken because of “grave violations” including “adopting various terrorist and sectarian groups” including “the Muslim Brotherhood Group, Daesh (ISIS) and al Qaeda,” the Saudis said in their declaration, without betraying a hint of irony. Who knew politics in the Greater Middle East were so complicated?
The Pakistanis, among others.
The Riyadh summit “has widened the sectarian divide in the Muslim world,” the nation’s leading newspaper, Dawn, declared over the weekend as the latest Saudi-Qatari tiff was about to transform into an all-out diplomatic and economic assault. “The Saudi-led Islamic Military Alliance against terrorism may have some counter-militancy aims, but it is also increasingly clear that it has been conceived by the kingdom as an anti-Iran alliance,” the paper said in an editorial titled “Dangerous Alliance.” In a blur of glittering chandeliers, glowing orbs, and billions of dollars in trade deals (along with a tidy gift to Ivanka Trump’s favorite charity), Saudi Arabia had deftly transformed itself into America’s soul-mate and Iran secured its place as Public Enemy #1. All that complex stuff about the so-called Islamic State being a Sunni terror group that gains its inspiration—and financing—from elements in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states, while Iran is Shiite and at war with ISIS, was left at the palace door. Ditto the fact that America’s bare-chested, muscle-flexing entry into the Middle East’s seminal religious and geographic divide left Pakistan—a Sunni-majority country with a sizable Shiite population —in a no-win situation. After all, while Saudi Arabia provides billions in aid to Muslim Pakistan, Iran is right next door.
The optics and timing of the Saudi summit were particularly challenging for Pakistan. Less than two weeks earlier the head of Iran’s armed forces had threatened military strikes on Pakistan after ten Iranian soldiers were killed by Pakistan-based Sunni militants. “Iran’s eastern border regions with Pakistan have become a safe haven for training and equipping terrorists recruited by Saudi Arabia and supported by the United States,” said Chief of Army Staff Major General Mohammad Hossein Bagheri, according to the Iran News Agency. “We will not tolerate this situation in the joint borders. If continued, we will hit the terrorists’ safe havens anywhere they are.” Making matters worse, Pakistan recently agreed to allow its former top general to command the military wing of the new Saudi-led alliance. The fact that it’s now an overtly anti-Iranian military force is a real problem for Islamabad policymakers. “We have to walk a very fine line between Saudi Arabia and Iran,” a senior government official told me. “It can be quite dangerous.” It’s dangerous for everyone else, as well, since Pakistan happens to have nuclear weapons.
Iran may not be willing to strike at Saudi Arabia, but Pakistan would be a tempting place to send a message if Islamabad doesn’t play its cards right. After all, Iran and Saudi Arabia are already fighting proxy wars in Syria and Yemen. What’s one more? Even if Iran’s military keeps its weapons sheathed, there are plenty of other ways Tehran could cause headaches for Pakistan by cutting trade; killing plans to supply electricity, desperately needed in a country suffering 12-to-14-hour-a-day power cuts; and, most crucially, stirring up trouble in the restive province of Baluchistan, on the shared border, as well as via Pakistani Shiite militant groups that can be found in every corner of the country.
Adding humiliation to diplomatic discomfort, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif—who reportedly practiced his speech while flying to Riyadh—was not allowed to address the Saudi-American summit, presumably because the Saudis knew he would make a case for his country’s difficult geo-political position. The snub has angered many here.
“Trump’s speech itself further added salt to the wounds,” wrote columnist Kunwar Khuldune Shahid in The Diplomat. “Not only did the U.S. president identify India as a victim of terror, he failed to acknowledge Pakistan as one.” Trump also refused a private meeting with Sharif, rubbing in the salt. That’s probably because the Americans want Pakistan, widely accused of cynically supporting militants, to do more to crack down on terrorist groups operating inside the country. Ironically, the militant organizations Washington is most concerned about are Sunni groups often spawned in the extremist Saudi-funded Madrassas that litter Pakistan. But let’s not let complicated facts get in the way of Good vs. Evil policy.
The long-simmering Saudi-Qatar enmity broke into the open not long after Air Force One lifted off from Riyadh.
It began with a Qatar News Agency story quoting the emir as dissing the Saudis and Emiratis and seemingly praising Iran. Qatar was being unfairly criticized by “some governments which promote terrorism by adopting a radical version of Islam which doesn't represent its tolerant reality," Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al Thani, was quoted by the Qatar News Agency as saying. The story went on: “There is no wisdom in harboring hostility toward Iran,” which he allegedly called “an Islamic power”—blasphemy to the Saudis—adding that Trump’s Saudi visit was an attempt to distract from the Russia investigation. Doha quickly claimed the news agency’s website had been hacked and the comments were “fake news.” If it was the work of agents provocateurs, they succeeded in igniting simmering tensions that had been papered over since the last time they came to blows over divergent policies toward the Muslim Brotherhood and Egypt.
The media war of words had been building to Monday’s dramatic break.
“Since its inception, Qatar has been an emirate of coups, treachery and playing with fire,” declared Saudi Arabia’s Al Eqtisadiya, in one typical broadside. “Bark as you wish, Qatar won’t change its principles,” Qatar’s Al Raya newspaper responded. The diplomatic blood-letting among erstwhile Gulf brethren is giving hope to some observers here that the so-called Muslim NATO, haughtily announced by the Saudis without much consultation with its presumptive allies, might amount to little more than a Trump photo op. “One summit meeting does not create an organization,” Amb. Ali Sarwar Naqvi of the Institute for International Strategic Studies in Islamabad told me. “This was already nebulous. This was all very much in the air, nothing concrete. I don’t think this alliance has much of a future.” With the Arabs once more lashing out at one another in what has become a family feud on steroids, that appears to be a pretty good bet. Pakistan is content to sit back and watch. There are no plans to follow in the footsteps of Saudi vassals like Yemen and the Maldives and cut ties with Qatar, according to the Foreign Ministry.
“The overriding imperative is that Islamabad keeps a healthy distance between itself and the conflicts raging across the Arab world,” The Express Tribune said in an editorial the morning after the break. “This is not our fight.” That unnamed government official mentioned earlier said much the same in more diplomatic language. “It is unfortunate that those latent animosities have surfaced again,” he told me over the phone. “We never like to see our friends squabbling, but it certainly relieves the pressure on us.” You could almost hear him smile.

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Bakhtzamina - Wakhla Zama De Narmo Sro

Pakistan - A CHRISTIAN WORKER’S UNTIMELY DEATH IN SINDH BETRAYS THE HYPOCRISY OF THE FASTING FAITHFUL

On June 2, Ifran Masih, a Christian who cleaned sewers in Sindh’s Umerkot, was allowed to die because Dr. Jam Kambar of the district’s civil hospital found him “too filthy” to treat. Kambar claimed he was fasting and could not sully himself by associating with uncleanliness in the holy month of Ramzan. Two other Muslim doctors, Dr. Yusuf and Dr. Allahdad Rathore, also shrank piously from saving Masih’s life.
Masih was serving the Muslim population of Umerkot during the sacred month by clearing an obstruction that had been reported by local residents. After he descended into the manhole in the scorching summer heat, he reportedly fainted after breathing the toxic gas rising from the sewer. Seeing him fall, two other sanity workers—also Christian—jumped in to save him but also lost consciousness.
Masih’s family carried his unconscious body to the hospital where the doctors were too pious to touch him. Then something even more unforgivable happened. After Masih’s brother Pervaiz cleaned his body, doctors gave him an oxygen tank to help in his resuscitation. That tank turned out to be empty, resulting in Masih’s untimely death.
Muslims claim special piety during the holy month of Ramzan when Allah revealed His religion to them. Sacred posturing is annually revealed when Muslims experience profiteering in food markets, even as many shirk the workplace over hunger pangs in the name of Allah. Umerkot has showcased this hypocrisy more starkly and revealed commonalties between the ultra-pious and ultra-violent.
Muslim terrorists too boast a superior brand of Islam as an excuse to kill their fellow men—Muslims and otherwise—in the holy month of Ramzan. Osama bin Laden made a point of killing Muslims during the holy month, but when the dastardly Americans killed him in Abbottabad, many pious Muslim were the ones most offended by his death. Now Abubakr al-Baghdadi of the Islamic State is continuing in bin Laden’s footsteps, and the misinformed fasting masses are paving the way for his brand of pious tyranny.


http://newsweekpakistan.com/ruthless-in-ramzan/

The US, Not Pakistan, Should Be Thanked For Restoration Of Temple In Karachi Which Was Used As A Toilet


The Temple Had Come to be Used As A Public Toilet

Secularism in Pakistan is a joke. India’s ‘Aman ki Aasha’ brigade – which releases its ‘love for Pakistan’ hormones during cricket matches between the two nations – may ignore this reality, but even the government of Pakistan shows no respect for any religion other than the official one.

This is why minorities in Pakistan have only two choices if they want to live a respectable life: 1. Convert, or 2. Leave the country. If they do not do that, they will either live their lives in their pitiable state or get killed by fundamentalists.

One classic example, among the many, of the government’s apathy towards minorities is how the government ignored the appalling state of a very famous ancient temple.

The Varun Dev temple is located in Manora in Pakistan’s Karachi district of Sindh. Compared to other parts of the country, Karachi is ‘secular’ and Hindus are more in number in Sindh than anywhere else in Pakistan.

The temple is approximately 1000 years old and is dedicated to Lord Varuna (the lord of the seas in Hinduism). It is probably the only temple and certainly the oldest and largest dedicated to the Hindu god in the entire Indian sub-continent.

Obviously, therefore, the temple should be a heritage symbol for Pakistan. The truth is shocking. It was reported by Daily Times in 2008 that a part of the temple was being used as a toilet. Yes, a toilet!

“When the temple was open for worshippers, a festival of ‘Lal Saien Varun Dev’ was celebrated by the Hindu community in the 1950s. Now the mandir’s rooms and premises are used as a toilet. This is a big insult to the Hindu community. Nobody respects the rights of the minorities,” Jivraj, the then caretaker of the temple, told the Daily Times.

The temple is located on the Manora Island, which brings it under the jurisdiction of the Pakistani Navy. So the Daily Times tried to contact the military estate officer (MEO) to inquire about the ownership of the mandir, but they got no response.

And when Jivraj wrote to the Manora Cantonment Board (MCB), he was told that there are no records.

Not one government official in Pakistan came forward to restore the temple in spite of the report. Then in 2016, the US Consulate in Karachi intervened.

Using the US Ambassador’s Fund for Cultural Preservation, the US decided to help in saving the heritage temple from disuse and destruction. Eight years had already passed from the time the Daily Times reported about it and the US intervention.

By now, the temple had reached an even worse state. The walls were crumbling and project director for restoration, Dr Asma Ibrahim, said that if they removed one wrong brick, the whole temple would collapse.

The news of the restoration of the temple was published and spread widely across Pakistan. To many of the ‘secularists’ in India, this was a noble gesture from Pakistan. What all of them failed to note – or did not note deliberately – is the fact that the temple’s restoration process is not because of Pakistan but because of the US.

Who funded the project? The US. Who is spearheading the efforts? The US. What did the Pakistani authorities do for the last eight years since the temple’s pathetic condition was reported? Nothing.

The last time that the temple had a proper ritual to the deity was sometime in 1950s. Ever since, illegal construction, vandalism and humidity of the region kept battering the temple. Government officials of the country did nothing.

On the contrary, Indian government preserves every monument, from the ancient to the modern, symbolizing the rich history of the country.

http://timesofahmad.blogspot.com/2017/06/perspective-us-not-pakistan-should-be.html

LONDON ATTACKER IDENTIFIED AS PAKISTANI-BORN BRITISH MAN

British police on Monday named two of the three attackers who killed seven people near London Bridge late on Saturday and injured dozens more, and said one of them was previously known to the security services and he is Pakistani-born British man.

London's Metropolitan Police said one attacker was Khuram Shazad Butt, aged 27. Butt was previously known to police and domestic spy agency, MI5 and was a British citizen who had been born in Pakistan, the police said.
“However, there was no intelligence to suggest that this attack was being planned and the investigation had been prioritised accordingly,” police said.
Butt appeared in a Channel 4 documentary entitled “The Jihadis Next Door” about British extremists that was broadcast last year, British media reported.
The second attacker was named as Rachid Redouane, aged 30, who also went by the identity Rachid Elkhdar and was not known to police. Redouane claimed to be Moroccan and Libyan.
Police said they were still working to establish the identity of the third attacker.
“I would urge anyone with information about these men, their movements in the days and hours before the attack and the places they frequented to come forward,” national counter-terrorism police chief Mark Rowley said in the statement.
“At any one time MI5 and police are conducting around 500 active investigations, involving 3,000 subjects of interest.
“Additionally, there are around 20,000 individuals who are former subjects of interest, whose risk remains subject to review by MI5 and its partners,” he said.
Police said they now had 10 people in custody after releasing two of the 12 people arrested on Sunday.

http://www.shiitenews.org/index.php/pakistan/item/28948-london-attacker-identified-as-pakistani-born-british-man

وفاقی بجٹ میں سندھ کے ترقیاتی منصوبوں کو نظرانداز کیا گیا ہے :پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی سندھ

پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی سندھ نے ایک مکمل عوامی بجٹ پیش کرنے پر وزیراعلیٰ سندھ اور سندھ حکومت کو خراج تحسین پیش کیا ہے اور وفاقی حکومت پر شدید تنقید کرتے ہوئے کہا ہے کہ وفاقی بجٹ میں سندھ کے ترقیاتی منصوبوں کو نظرانداز کیا گیا، نوازلیگ کا شیر ہمیشہ ملکی اداروں پر حملہ آور ہوا ہے، پانامالیکس سے بچنے کے لیے نوازلیگ ملک کے معتبر اداروں پر حملہ آور ہورہی ہے، 2018 کے عام انتخابات میں ملک کا عوام پانامالیگ کا احتساب کرے گا، پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی سندھ کی ایگزیکیوٹو کمیٹی کا اجلاس آج یہاں سندھ اسیمبلی بلڈنگ میں پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی سندھ کے صدر سینئرصوبائی وزیر نثار احمد کھوڑو کی زیر صدارت منعقد ہوا، جس میں وزیراعلیٰ سندھ سید مراد علی شاہ، وقار مہدی، نفیسہ شاہ، سینیٹرعاجز دھامراہ، سید ناصر حسین شاہ، مولا بخش چانڈیو، مرتضیٰ وہاب، حمیرہ علوانی، عبدالواحد سومرو اور نعمان شیخ نے شرکت کی، اجلاس میں کہا گیا کہ نواز لیگ نے ملکی اداروں پر حملہ کرنے کے لیے نہال ہاشمی کی تقریر اور بعد میں اس کی جعلی استعفیٰ کا ڈرامہ رچایا، اجلاس میں وفاقی حکومت کی جانب سے وفاقی بجٹ میں سندھ کے ترقیاتی منصوبوں کو نظرانداز کرنے کی شدید الفاظ میں مذمت کرتے ہوئے کہا گیا کہ نوازلیگ حکومت نے پہلے ہی سندھ میں بجلی کی طویل لوڈشیڈنگ کرکے عوام کا جینا محال کردیا ہے، نوازلیگ کو سندھ کے عوام کی تکالیف کا احساس نہ پہلے کبھی ہوا ہے اور نہ اب کبھی ہوگا، پیپلزپارٹی سندھ ایگزیکیوٹو کمیٹی نے اپوزیشن لیڈر خواجہ اظہار الحسن کی جانب سے معزز ایوان کے اراکین کو دھمکیاں دینے پر بھی کڑی تنقید کی گئی اور کہا گیا کہ خواجہ اظہار الحسن کی دھمکیوں سے لگتا ہے کہ متحدہ پاکستان کے اندر موجود الطاف حسین کا روح باہر نکل رہا ہے، اجلاس میں کراچی سمیت سندھ کے مختلف اضلاع میں جاری ترقیاتی کاموں پر حکومت سندھ کے اقدامات کو سراہا گیا ، اجلاس سے خطاب کرتے ہوئے پیپلزپارٹی سندھ کے صدر نثار احمد کھوڑو نے کہا کہ سندھ حکومت نے صوبے میں ترقیاتی منصوبوں کا جال بچھایا ہے، 2018 کے عام انتخابات میں بھی پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی اپنی کارکردگی کے بنیاد پر ایک بارپھر اقتدار حاصل کرے گی، انہوں نے کہا کہ اگلے عام انتخابات میں مخالفین کو سندھ میں پیپلزپارٹی کے سامنے مقابلے کے لیے امیدوار بھی نہیں ملیں گے، نثارا حمد کھوڑو نے کہا کہ پاکستان پیپلزپارٹی نے ہمیشہ عوام کی بات کی ہے ، پیپلزپارٹی اور عوام کا یہ اٹوٹ رشتہ ہمیشہ قائم رہے گا۔



https://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/