Wednesday, January 20, 2016

The End of Saudi Arabia?

By Mike Konrad 


A more detestable regime than Saudi Arabia could not be found.  Arguably the most repressive regime on earth.  An absolute monarchy.  A Wahhabist theocratic nightmare that arms ISIS.  Only North Korea may be worse, and North Korea does not put women in burqas or have any areas where female genital mutilation (FGM) is practiced.  It is a close call.  At least North Korea does not ban alcohol.

Make no mistake about it: Shi'a Iran, as bad as it is, is nowhere near as oppressive as the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).  There are churches in Iran, albeit persecuted.  There are none in the KSA.  Not even a façade of tolerance.  If Iran and the Shi'a-led Hezb'allah are the world's chief exporters of terror, it is because they are more competent than Sunnis, not because their tyranny is darker than the KSA's Wahhabism. 

The Saud family came from the Arabian interior (the Najd) to overrun the west coast of the peninsula (the Hejaz – the historic center of Islam) in 1925.  The Najd had survived mostly immune from imperial expansion basically because it was a useless wasteland that no one thought worth conquering, a unique honor it shares only with Antarctica.

The collapse of the Ottoman Empire, followed by British meddling, eventually led to the Saudi takeover of the whole area from their chief rival, the Husseins of Mecca.

The present worldwide depression – let's call it what it is, not a recession – is partly the direct result of Saudi manipulations.

Fracking, particularly in the United States, was on the verge of making the USA independent of oil imports.  Europe, Latin America, Oceania, and China were all starting to frack.  As technology got cheaper, Saudi Arabia knew that, left unchecked, one day the world would break free of Muslim oil extortion, and their cash cow would be kaput.  The KSA, which produces little else, would be back to selling sand, and the Quranically approved as healthful camel urine – but since dromedaries are not unique to the peninsula, even that market would be lost to them.

The Saudis have been at this oil price manipulation game for over 40 years.

The OPEC nations, led by the KSA, created a worldwide recession with the oil embargo in 1973, to protest Israel's victory in the Yom Kippur War.  Afterward, the price of oil would double.  Nations that were on the verge of a middle-class breakthrough, like Brazil, were throttled back to poverty after the enormous price-gouging.  The USA became frozen as a net importing nation.  This set back Westernization, and the Industrial Revolution, for decades in the emerging world.

Initially, to keep oil prices up, the Saudis would drop production by 75%.

However, the artificially high cost of oil led to massive exploration.  North Sea oil came online.  The Saudis were starting to run budget deficits, and they blinked.  They decided to drop prices and sell more oil to break the competition.

The '80s price drop crushed the nascent shale industry for decades here in the USA.  American energy independence was forestalled, as the Saudis wanted.

The low price of oil eventually gave way to price increases as Chinese industrialization came online with massive demand.  By 2008, oil was at $145 a barrel.  Of course, the 2008 crash brought some relief to that.

At the same time, fracking was taking over and competing with Saudi crude.  There was serious talk of the USA becoming oil-independent.  The KSA was in a real fix, and everyone knew it.  Small nations, like Ireland, were pondering becoming oil-rich. Ojalá!  Even the detested Jews were swimming in oil.

In 2014, the Saudis decided to dump oil on the market at low prices again in order to drive foreign competitors out of business, as they had in the 1980s.  Once the American frackers were broke, once the cost of Israeli drilling became prohibitive, and after everyone else was shut down, the Saudis could ratchet up the price all over again.  This would also have the benefit of destroying the hated Shi'a mullahs of Iran, with their nuclear program that threatens the Sunni KSA.  A poorer Iran would mean no Iranian nukes to worry about.  No Iranian sponsorship of Syria's Assad.

Price-fixing at its worst.  Were this done inside a country, it would be illegal.  The Saudis get away with it because they are independent.

The price drop has had a massive effect on the market.  Some U.S. frackers went bust.  Brazil's Petrobras is selling assets on a fire sale.  Much of China's and Brazil's economies has collapsed.  Chinese oil firms took a massive hit.
The economic devastation you see all around, as markets collapse, is due in no small part to the KSA's manipulations – manipulations that have throttled progress for decades.

However, the Saudis have made a major blunder this time.  Technology is still making fracking cheaper.  So a considerable number of frackers are waiting out the storm.  Once the Saudis raise prices, American exploration will be back online quickly.  The KSA is fighting a losing battle.

Worse yet, any increase in prices will also help Iran's budget.  It seems the KSA is stuck at the bottom of the price graph, damned no matter what its monarch does.

In five years, the KSA's foreign reserves are expected to be emptied out.  Already, the KSA is dropping internal subsidies on electricity and domestic gasoline.  The local people are upset.  Upset Muslims means violent revolution.

For over forty years, this blight of a tribe has caused recessions, caused depressions, and damaged the planet's economy.  They got wealthy by re-impoverishing an emerging Third World, starting with the artificially created 1973 oil crisis.  They have used their oil wealth to sponsor terrorism (as has Iran).  Rather than investing wisely in industry to pick up market slack to become a modern diversified economy, they have invested instead in subsidizing mullahs, arming Salafist extremists in Syria, and exporting Islam around the world.

Now they have no options.  Any increase in prices will restart American, European, and Chinese frackers.  Failure to increase prices will bankrupt them.  As a further blessing, we Americans will no longer have to hear the caterwauling idiocies of environmentalist Chicken Littles screaming about "peak oil."

What the USA can do is protect its fracking industry by severely taxing any oil imports under $50 a barrel.  This may upset some free marketers, but the price of oil is rigged.  We should rig it in our favor, and insulate ourselves from Saudi manipulations.

Good riddance to the KSA – a corrupt, vicious regime!  May their next chief export be bottled camel urine.  I wish America had never gotten involved with them.

Mike Konrad is the pen name of an American who is neither Jewish, Latin, nor Arab. He runs a website, http://latinarabia.com, where he discusses the subculture of Arabs in Latin America. He wishes his Spanish were better.

Video Report - Chinese President publishes signed article on Egyptian newspaper

India's Caste System: More than 160 million people deemed "untouchable"

Over 5 million jobs will be lost due to The Fourth Industrial Revolution, report says

By Yuan Can 

Disruptive labor market changes will result in a loss of more than 5.1 million jobs from 2015 to 2020, according to a latest report by World Economic Forum (WEF).
The Fourth Industrial Revolutionwhich includes developments in previously disjointedfields such as artificial intelligence and machine-learningroboticsnanotechnology, 3-Dprintingand genetics and biotechnologywill cause widespread disruption not only tobusiness models but also to labor markets over the next five yearsaccording to the report,The Future of Jobspublished Monday by the WEF
This trend will lead to a loss of more than 5 million jobs in 15 major developed and emerging economiessaid the report.
The report predicts that in the next five years there will be a total loss of 7.1 million jobstwo thirds of which are concentrated in routine white collar office functionssuch asoffice and administrative rolesand a total gain of 2 million jobsin computer andmathematical and Architecture and Engineering related fields.
"In its scalescopeand complexitythe transformation will be unlike anything humankindhas experienced before," wrote Klaus SchwabFounder and Executive Chairman of WEFin his latest article called The Fourth Industrial Revolutionwhat it meanshow torespond.
Compared with previous industrial revolutionsthe Fourth is evolving at an exponentialrather than a linear pacesaid SchwabMoreoverit is disrupting almost every industry inevery countryAnd the breadth and depth of these changes herald the transformation ofentire systems of productionmanagementand governance.
According to a latest international surveyfour out of 10 young people around the worldworry that robot will replace them in the future workforce due to rapid development oftechnology.
Commissioned by Indian business and software services firm Infosysthe study surveyedaround 1,000 16-to 25-year-olds in AustraliaBrazilBritainChinaFranceGermany,India and the United Statesas well as South Africawhere a smaller sample of 700 waspolledYoung people in developed economies are more worried about their future jobs.
Nearly 80 per cent of interviewees think that it is a must to keep learning in order to gaincompetitiveness ahead of rapid development of technology.
Globallywhile almost two-thirds of those queried said they felt positive about their jobprospectsthose in developing economies were far more optimistic than their peers indeveloped marketsIn India, 60 per cent said they think they have the skills needed fortheir careersjust a quarter were similarly optimistic in Francethe poll found.
The survey shows that nearly 50 per cent of interviewees from developed markets said thatthe education they received is not suitable for jobs.
According to Infosys Chief Executive Vishal Sikkatechnologies have evolved far fasterthan what was thought possible even 10 years agowhile the educational system remainswedded to practices initially designed for agrarian societies 300 years ago.
"We must transition away from our pastshift the focus from learning what we alreadyknow to an education focused on exploring what hasnt happened yet," said Sikka.

Life After Sanctions: Tehran Offers Moscow Tips on Surviving the Squeeze

Commenting on the lifting of Western sanctions against Iran, and the possible implications for the Russian-Iranian partnership, Syrian journalist Abbas Juma suggests that however events may unfold, the two countries have a rich history of relations to build on. Moreover, Tehran may yet teach Moscow a thing or two on how to deal with the West.



With Western countries dropping most of their sanctions against Iran in recent days, in accordance with the Iranian nuclear agreement reached last year, Juma, in his Sunday op-ed for the independent Russian newspaper Svobodnaya Pressa, suggested that now, Iran may very well become an OPEC leader, doubling its oil exports (to 2 million barrels per day).

Now, with an improvement in relations between Iran, Europe and the United States on the horizon, "Russians," the journalist suggests, "are anxious about the future of Russian-Iranian relations." However, in Juma's view, Moscow has little to worry about.

A History Stretching Centuries

"Speaking in modern language, Russia began cooperating with Iran even before it was the hip thing to do. Russian-Persian diplomatic relations were established over 400 years ago, under the Ruriks, when the two countries reached a new level of economic and political development." With both countries facing political unification and the formation of unified markets, "each had something to offer the other in various areas."
Still, urging against a rose-tinted view of history, Juma recalls that "in four centuries, Russian-Iranian relations have gone through a lot. There were Russian-Persian wars, and the tragic death of [Russian diplomat and poet] Alexander Griboyedov during the massacre in the Russian embassy in Tehran in 1829 (today the Iranian capital features a monument to the author of the verse comedy The Woes of Wit as a reminder of that terrible day)."

Moreover, "the Iranian Shiite clergy would christen the atheistic USSR the 'Little Satan' (which did not prevent Tehran from purchasing modern weaponry from the Soviet Union in the 80s). And for fairness' sake, it must be recalled that Russian soldiers too had repeatedly invaded Iranian territory, which did not cause enthusiasm among the locals, to put it mildly."

"But that's how the history flows," Juma writes. "Bright spots alternate with dark clouds, and the process repeats. Thus, while the collapse of the Soviet Union may have had many negative consequences for Russia, Russian-Iranian relations were not one of them. Tehran lost its fear of the 'Little Satan', and pragmatically realized that the resumption of close cooperation with Moscow would bring them great benefits. And that's how things turned out. In 1992, Russia and Iran signed an agreement on the construction of the Bushehr nuclear power plant, and to date an agreement has been reached on the construction of Bushehr II."

"Since 2012," the journalist recalls, "against the backdrop of the crisis in the Middle East, relations between Moscow and Tehran warmed once again, becoming a key topic for discussion in the world. And similarly to how the West once feared the rise of Soviet influence over Tehran, today once again it is attempting to prevent the two rising powers from moving closer together. This is no accident; after all, now more than ever, the idea of a military-political alliance between Iran and Russia, as a counterweight to NATO, is taking shape."

"Consistent, multilateral dialogue with Iran has become one of the main foreign policy directions over the course of Vladimir Putin's presidency. One can only recall that March 2001 saw the signing of the Treaty on the Principles of Relations and Principles of Cooperation Between the Russian Federation and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Today, in accordance with article 18 of the treaty, Moscow and Tehran are cooperating with one another in an attempt to solve major world problems – specifically the Syrian and Iraqi crises."
Russia Could Learn a Thing or Two From Iran

Today, as the West lifts its sanctions against Tehran, while prolonging and expanding them in relation to Moscow, the Russians, Juma suggests, might have a thing or two to learn from the Iranians on how to get back on their feet in spite of Western attempts to isolate them.

"Traditionally, the Western 'civilized world' treats countries which attempt to lift up their heads and declare their unwillingness to dance to the tune of others with contempt. It happened with Iran after the 1979 Islamic revolution."

"Then," Juma recalls, "when Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected president in 2005, sanctions were imposed against Iran. Under his presidency, due to his country's alleged uranium enrichment program, Iran was subjected to the most severe sanctions pressure the US and its allies could muster."

"Nevertheless, Iran managed to become a leading regional power, which has now forced those who once sought to grind the country into dust to negotiate. Today, as sanctions against Tehran are removed, the Iranians stand before the world proud and independent."

"Their circumstances," the journalist notes, "taught them to be independent – to make everything with their own hands, from slippers to drones. Today, graduates of Iranian schools are becoming Nobel laureates and occupying leading positions in international high-tech centers. In medicine, the country is almost 100% self-sufficient, actively developing its pharmaceutical industry, carrying out difficult operations, and doing without imported equipment."

"Of course, the country has its problems; the banking sector is suffering under the pressure of sanctions, the economy cannot boast of major innovations, and is growing more slowly than we would like. But it's worth remembering the situation the country faced 40 years ago and compare it with the Iran of today. Russia would certainly benefit from studying the Iranian experience in the field of import substitution, given that the West's anti-Russian sanctions, experts confirm, won't be removed any time soon."

Economic, Energy, Political and Military Cooperation

Furthermore, Juma argues, "post-sanctions Iran may become a very good partner for Russia in various fields, something the Russian president is well aware of. In November, following talks with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, Vladimir Putin expressed Moscow's readiness to provide Tehran $5 billion in credit. Following negotiations, the heads of state selected 35 priority projects [related to] energy, construction, ports and railroads."

At the same time, "the two countries agreed to cooperate in the oil and gas sectors. Thus, Mehdi Hosseini, the Chairman of the Oil Contract Restructuring Committee at the Iranian Ministry of Petroleum, announced in late November that Gazprom and Lukoil have good prospects for receiving access to fields in Iran. At the same time, Oil Minister Bijan Zangeneh expressed his confidence that following the removal of anti-Russian sanctions, cooperation between Moscow and Tehran in the energy sector will continue with a renewed vigor."
"As for the military sphere," Juma recalled, "here, it seems likely that we will see new contracts worth billions of dollars, because given the unstable conditions in the Middle East, Iran needs to modernize its armed forces, which means that Tehran will be extremely interested in Russian weapons."



The Russian-Turkish scandal too, in Juma's view, is worth mentioning. "Moscow and Ankara had been connected by a multitude of contracts in various areas; therefore Moscow will now be looking for new partners to 'fill the gaps'. Given that Iran is becoming a significant exporter of agricultural products (mostly fruits and vegetables), Russia can easily start buying produce from the Islamic Republic, which, incidentally, is already being done."

Finally, the analyst suggests, "the simplification of the visa regime may also serve as a significant impetus for closer cooperation, and this is a path the two countries have already embarked upon. On November 23, 2015, during Putin's visit to Iran, the two countries signed an agreement on visa-free travel for certain categories of citizens."

In the final analysis, Juma suggests, as anti-Iranian sanctions are removed and relations with Western countries, particularly Europe, improve, Moscow and Tehran "have yet to determine in which areas and to what extent they can cooperate." Urging against an overoptimistic appraisal of the potential for cooperation, the journalist notes that nevertheless, in today's world, the prospects look good.

‘We’ll fight ISIS until its complete annihilation’ – Russian FM Lavrov after Kerry talks

Islamic State and the Nusra Front won’t be part of the proposed Syrian ceasefire as the fight against the jihadists will go on until their complete annihilation, Russian FM Sergey Lavrov and his US counterpart, John Kerry, agreed during talks in Zurich.
“The main thing is that we came to an unambiguous conclusion that the UN Security Council Resolution 2254 will remain the main basis for us to move forward,” Lavrov told journalists in Switzerland.
During the negotiations, the two diplomats “discussed practical steps to ensure the conditions for a ceasefire” in Syria in accordance with the UN resolution, the Russian foreign minister added.
The truce “wouldn’t apply to terrorist organizations Islamic State and the Nusra Front (Jabhat al-Nusra),” he stressed.
"They can’t be subject to an agreement on a ceasefire as they remain our enemies. And we’ll continue to fight them until their complete annihilation,” Lavrov stressed.
Moscow and Washington insist that the peace talks between the Syrian government and opposition shouldn’t be postponed beyond January, Lavrov said.
“We are not even considering the postponement of talks from January to February... We are certain that these talks must start in the next few days,” he said.
The intra-Syrian talks are scheduled to take place in another Swiss city, Geneva, on January 25.
The negotiations will focus on such issues as the tasks of the transition period, preparation of the new constitution and early election, the FM said, adding that Russia, the US and other foreign players will only monitor the talks.
Lavrov was also asked whether Kerry and him had reached an agreement on the participation of the Ahrar ash-Sham and Jaish al-Islamin groups in the Syrian talks.
"We can say that there is no such agreement," the Russia's top diplomat replied.
Russia presented data on the terrorist nature of both groups to the US during the Zurich meeting, maintaining its stance that Ahrar ash-Sham and Jaish al-Islamin have no place at the negotiating table.
Ahrar ash-Sham “is known to have been repeatedly shelling residential quarters of Damascus and Russia's embassy. Ahrar ash-Sham is a child of Al-Qaeda," Lavrov explained.
However, the FM expressed confidence that UN Special Envoy on Syria, Staffan de Mistura, would be able to form a representative opposition delegation for the intra-Syrian negotiations.
The foreign minister also told Kerry that Moscow “is ready to coordinate with the US-led coalition” regarding Russia’s humanitarian assistance in Syria.
The participants of the talks “reaffirmed the need to deal with the humanitarian problems in Syria,” he said.

Lavrov said that he assured his counterpart that the Russian Air Force is taking into account the UN and Red Cross programs in Syria as they conduct their humanitarian operation.
The Russian military launched a humanitarian operation in Syria last week in order to supply food and essentials to the residents of besieged towns and villages.

Video Report - Flint Mayor Slams State on Water Crisis

Biden Vows Quicker US Approval of Cancer Drug Combinations

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden said Tuesday that the United States would speed up the approval of promising new drug combinations in his government's newly announced drive to cure cancer "once and for all."
Biden, who lost his son Beau, 46, to brain cancer last year, set out his plans at a World Economic Forum meeting of international cancer experts in Davos, a week after being appointed to lead the initiative by President Barack Obama.
So-called combination therapy is increasingly seen as central to fighting tumors, as scientists unlock the different genetic factors driving cancer cell growth, but bringing such cocktails to market can be slow and costly.
Biden said he had hosted a meeting at his home with three unnamed large drug companies and the head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration at which both sides had pledged to do more to get novel cancer drug cocktails to patients.
"The head of the FDA made a commitment that everybody would move much more rapidly in approving combinations," Biden said.
At the same, the pharmaceutical industry executives had all said they were "open to a different way of doing business" in order to ensure that promising drugs from different companies were tested together as early as possible, he added.
Cancer experts are particularly excited by the promise of new immunotherapy medicines that help the body's immune system fight tumors and that have been shown to work well when used alongside other drugs.
Francis Collins, director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, described their potential as "breathtaking."
High prices
But such immunotherapy drugs are expensive — typically costing well over $100,000 a year per patient — and companies have traditionally been defensive about sharing early-stage medical experiments.
Obama's call to "make America the country that cures cancer once and for all" in the last State of the Union address of his presidency has led to criticism from some scientists of an oversimplified approach to the killer condition.
The latest government-led initiative has echoes of former President Richard Nixon's unsuccessful "War on Cancer" in the 1970s. Since then, scientists have discovered that cancer is hundreds of different diseases rather than one single disorder, making the notion of a single cure outdated.
Biden acknowledged the complexity in Davos. "I'm not naive enough to think or suggest we are going to have a cure for every cancer in the world in the near term," he said.

Bernie Sanders Widens Lead Over Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire

By Patrick Healy
Three weeks before New Hampshire’s presidential primary, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont has jumped out to a 27 percentage point lead over Hillary Clinton in a poll of likely Democratic voters there released by CNN/WMUR on Tuesday evening.
Mr. Sanders’s lead, 60 percent to 33 percent, is stunning by New Hampshire standards, given that most polls have shown a tight race there and that Mrs. Clinton won the state’s primary in 2008. But Mr. Sanders, a well-known figure in New Hampshire after a 30-year political career in neighboring Vermont, has been enjoying a burst of political momentum in recent weeks, and he appears to be consolidating support among New Hampshire voters who viewed him favorably but had yet to commit to his candidacy.
Among the harshest findings for Mrs. Clinton, 55 percent of likely Democratic voters said she was the “least honest” of the party’s presidential candidates, compared with 33 percent who said that in September and 46 percent in December. Only 2 percent of those surveyed described Mr. Sanders as the least honest in the Democratic field.
And one-third of those surveyed said that Mrs. Clinton had the “personal characteristics and qualities” that a president should have, compared with 58 percent who described Mr. Sanders that way.
Some Clinton allies privately expressed surprise over the margin of Mr. Sanders’s lead, and even some advisers to Mr. Sanders said they did not believe he was as far ahead as the new poll showed. No Democrat has received more than 45 percent of the primary vote in New Hampshire since 1972, aside from sitting presidents or vice presidents.
Mrs. Clinton, who held double-digit leads over Mr. Sanders in New Hampshire though midsummer, continues to have many political advantages in the Feb. 9 primary, including support from its governor and Democratic senator. Her husband, former President Bill Clinton, is also deeply popular there, and on Wednesday he was scheduled to make his third campaign trip to New Hampshire this month. Yet Mrs. Clinton never took a repeat victory in New Hampshire for granted: No neighboring-state Democrat has lost the primary in the last 30 years, except when former Gov. Howard Dean of Vermont finished second to Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts in 2004.
The poll was mostly conducted before Sunday night’s Democratic debate, where Mrs. Clinton tried to blunt Mr. Sanders’s momentum with attacks on his new plan for broad-based tax increases and on his past votes against some gun control legislation. She received mixed reviews in that debate, while Mr. Sanders received strong praise in some quarters and skepticism from others about his call for broad-based tax increases.
In the previous CNN/WMUR poll, released in early December, Mr. Sanders had 50 percent of the vote to Mrs. Clinton’s 40 percent. In the new poll, the bulk of Mr. Sanders’s support came from younger voters and independents, but he also had the edge among registered Democrats as well. More than half of those surveyed said they had definitely decided who they would support, compared to 36 percent who expressed that view in December.
After the poll was released, Jeff Weaver, Mr. Sanders’s campaign manager, said that the Sanders operation was taking nothing for granted.
“This poll suggests that our campaign has real momentum and that the American people want to go beyond establishment politics and establishment economics,” Mr. Weaver said.
Shortly after the poll was released, Mrs. Clinton’s communication’s director, Jennifer Palmieri, released a statement arguing that the Republican National Committee and other conservative groups were “aiding” Mr. Sanders’s campaign because they were scared to face Mrs. Clinton in a general election.
“While Senator Sanders tries to make a case on electability based on meaningless polls, Republicans and their ‘super PACs’ have made clear the candidate they’re actually afraid to face,” Ms. Palmieri said. “Both Sanders and the Republicans know that Hillary is the candidate who can take them on and ensure the White House isn’t in Donald Trump or Ted Cruz’s hands.”
Mr. Sanders has also been gaining strength in Iowa, which holds its first-in-the-nation caucuses on Feb. 1, with polls showing a close race there between him and Mrs. Clinton. She had held a fairly steady lead in Iowa through the fall and early winter.

Video - 2015 was the warmest year since 1880

Obama makes brewery pit stop in Detroit

President Barack Obama landed in Michigan shortly after noon today and prepared for a day of celebrating the resurgence of Detroit and the domestic auto industry.
It was 18 degrees and snowing at Detroit Metro Airport when Air Force One touched down. On hand to greet the president were Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan; U.S. Rep. John Conyers, a Democrat from Detroit; and Wayne County Executive Warren Evans. Traveling with Obama from Washington, D.C., were U.S. Reps. Debbie Dingell,  a Democrat from Dearborn, and Brenda Lawrence,  a Democrat from Southfield.
The president is expected to tour the North American International Auto Show for the first time and give remarks at the UAW GM Center for Human Resources about the auto industry’s successes since General Motors and what is now Fiat Chrysler Automobiles emerged from a federal bailout and structured bankruptcy in 2009.
Obama and Duggan made an unscheduled stop at the Jolly Pumpkin brewery and restaurant in Detroit's Midtown area. They dined with Tom Kartsotis, the founder of the Shinola watch company, which is next to the restaurant on Canfield, Tolulope Sonuyi, a  physician engaged with Detroit youths in violence prevention and intervention programs tied to the My Brother’s Keeper initiative, and Teana Dowdell, an autoworker at GM's Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly plant.
  • While Obama isn’t traveling to Flint to examine the city’s water crisis first-hand, his deputy press secretary, Eric Schultz, told reporters on Air Force One: "The president … met with the mayor yesterday, and he wants to make sure we are marshaling all the resources of the federal government."
When asked  whether Snyder should resign, Schultz said: "Our view is right now (is that) everybody should be focused on the actual problem.”

http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/01/20/president-obama-detroit-auto-show/79063668/

#charsaddaattack - Pashto Song - kala me Perzo she pa Bamono Pekhawara

How We In Pakistan See Today's University Attack

Pakistan finds itself reeling after yet another terror attack on its soil. Heavily armed militants stormed Bacha Khan University this morning in Charsadda, about 50 kilometers from the city of Peshawar, and opened indiscriminate fire on students and staff members where they had gathered for a poetic symposium to commemorate the 28th death anniversary of renowned Pakhtoon leader and proponent of non-violence Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, popularly known as 'Bacha Khan'.

Umar Mansoor, a commander in the outlawed Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistani (TTP) and the mastermind of the attack on the Army Public School Peshawar in December 2014, first claimed the attack. But the official spokesperson for the Pakistani Taliban disowned it. More than 21 people are reported to have been killed and at least 60 others injured during a two-hour rampage; officials fear the casualties will rise. Four terrorists were shot after the security forces launched a remarkable counter-terror operation in the university's premises in a bid to control the damage.

The investigations into the terror attack are underway, but we must not avert our eyes from the fact that the attack was the result of yet another intelligence failure and a major security lapse, especially when only three days ago, rumors of security threats to educational institutions triggered the closure of schools in the same region.

In many ways, today's attack was reminiscent of the gruesome December 2014 terrorist attack on the Army Public School in Peshawar which left over 140 dead - most of them children. The message behind today's attack is the same. 13 months ago, they targeted a school being run by the Pakistan Army that is actively combating terrorists and eliminating their hideouts in North Waziristan. Today, they attacked a university named after Bacha Khan, the man who laid down the foundations of the politics of the secular Awami National Party that has rendered a number of sacrifices for standing up against the Taliban. The message given by the terrorists is loud and clear: standing up to them has a price, and more often than not, you have to pay that with your blood.

More than the identity of the outfit that has claimed the attack on Bacha Khan University, the people of Pakistan in general and those at the helm of affairs in the country in particular need to counter the mindset of the terrorists and the ideology they preach in the name of Islam. These terrorists are afraid of education. They are afraid of the power of knowledge. The very same mindset and the very same group targeted Malala Yousafzai in October 2012, attacked the Army Public School in December 2014 and stormed a university today, apart from  deadly attacks on polio vaccination teams across the country.

Despite the ongoing operation against the hardcore militants in the tribal areas of Pakistan, the TTP's ability to strike in the settled areas of the country should be a matter of concern for Pakistan's civil and military leadership. The rot is surely deep and Pakistan is passing through extraordinary circumstances which demand extraordinary measures. While it is obvious that it'll take significant amount of time to eliminate terror from Pakistan, the more worrying part is that the state of Pakistan has shown no clear intent or political will to counter the mindset that has been a major hurdle in developing a counter-terrorism narrative in the country.

After the horrific terror attack on Army Public School that jolted Pakistan's civil and military leadership, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif announced a comprehensive roadmap to counter terrorism in his 20-point agenda known as National Action Plan.

While the plan looked good on paper, the situation on the ground remains disturbingly awful and unchanged. The plan talked about countering hate speeches and extremist material, choking funding for terrorists and terrorist organizations and dismantling communication networks of terrorist organizations. Point 3 of the plan stressed the commitment to ensuring that no armed militias are allowed to function in Pakistan, while points 10 and 11 talked about the registration and regulation of religious seminaries and a ban on the glorification of terrorism and terrorist organizations through print and electronic media.

Ground realities suggest that little has changed since then - so much so that the incumbent government itself has accepted that the progress on National Action Plan has been unsatisfactory.

There is another aspect of the attack and that directly affects the already fragile and vulnerable relations between Pakistan and India. Hardliners in Pakistan are linking today's terrorist attack to a statement given by Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar after the Pathankot terror attack in which he said that "Those who harmed us will feel the pain". Former interior minister of Pakistan Rehman Malik went as far as to blame Indian intelligence agency RAW for this latest attack on Pakistani soil. The two reckless statements mentioned above underscore the need to show restraint and maturity in the face of adversity. The authorities on either side of the border need to realize that they should not play into the hands of the terrorists.

As far as Pakistani authorities are concerned, they need to focus on the security threats to Pakistan posed by militants who not long ago enjoyed state patronage, and show the intent to take on terrorists without making any discrimination.

Militant who claimed responsibility for Pathankot attack warns Pakistan against crackdown













BY ABU ARQAM NAQASH

The Pakistan-based chief of a militant alliance fighting for an end to Indian rule in divided Kashmir openly condemned on Wednesday a crackdown by the Pakistan government against another group India blames for an attack on an air base.
Syed Salahuddin, the chairman of the United Jihad Council (UJC), an alliance of pro-Pakistan militant groups based in the Pakistani-administered part of the divided Kashmir region, had claimed responsibility for the assault in Pathankot on Jan. 2.
The claim of responsibility was met with a sceptical response among India's security establishment, which blames another group called Jaish-e-Mohammed.
Last week, Pakistan arrested the head of Jaish-e-Mohammed as well as several other leaders of the group and shut down offices and seminaries linked to the outfit.
"We are at a loss to understand whether they (the Pakistan government) are concerned about the interests of the country that feeds them or that of its enemy?" Salahuddin told a news conference, referring to the government's crackdown.
"Pakistan is not only an advocate but also a party to the longstanding Kashmir dispute and therefore the Pakistani people, government and media should play the role of a patron rather than of an adversary."
Salahuddin's public comments could cause further tensions between the two nuclear armed rivals, with New Delhi accusing Islamabad of tolerating groups openly hostile to India.
He spoke at the Press Club in Muzzafarabad, capital of Pakistani-administered part of Kashmir. Police outside the club made no move to arrest him.
Following the Jan. 2 attack on the Indian air base, the United Jihad Council had warned that their attacks "can engulf all of India" if the issue of Kashmir's divided rule is not resolved.
Since the attack in Pathankot, Pakistan has said it is clamping down on Jaish-e-Mohammed, which India has long accused Pakistani authorities of tolerating, while it investigates Indian assertions that the attack was the work of the militants based in Pakistan.
India has demanded that Pakistan take action against the group and last week announced that the two countries would reschedule talks between their foreign ministers while the investigation into the air base attack was carried out.

Jaish-e-Mohammed militants are blamed for a 2001 attack on India's parliament that nearly led to a war between the nuclear-armed rivals.

Video Report - Car bombing hits near Russian embassy in Kabul

Video - #charsaddaattack - Two Witnesses Speak About Pakistan University Attack

#charsaddaattack - Saudi sponsored Deobandi terrorists massacre Pakistani university students in Charsadda

Naseem Chaudhary

Saudi sponsored, Deobandi terrorists from the Taliban slaughter dozens of Pakistani university students while “liberal” “intelligentsia” still regurgitating the dishonest Iran = Saudi binary.
In January 2016, Saudi-financed and ISIS-affiliated Takfiri Deobandi Taliban terrorists have already conducted bomb attacks on security forces and polio workers And now university students.
Meanwhile the media continues to hide and obfuscate the specific common denominator – Deobandi – of these terrorist attacks as well as over 90% of all terrorist attacks in Pakistan. In January 2016, the majority of victims of‪#‎DeobandiTerrorism‬ ‪#‎TakfiriViolence‬ are Sunni Muslims which destroys the dishonest and obfuscations of those who perpetuate the dishonest “Sunni vs Shia binary in Pakistan.
The Takfiri Deobandi terrorists who perpetrated the APS school massacre just a year ago have already boasted and taken responsibility for the massacre today at Charsadda.
Pakistan can no longer afford selective activism and needs to:
1. Immediately arrest ISIS-affiliated Deobandi Cleric Abdul Aziz. Just yesterday, PML N government’s Interior Minister Chaudhary Nisar was questioned as to why Abdul Aziz is still free inspite of cases and complaints lodged against him. Abdul Aziz justified the APS attacks in December 2014.
2. No more selective operations which continue to ignore urban Deobandi and Taliban-affiliated groups like ASWJ-LeJ as well as Jaish Mohammad.
3. Taliban facilitators like PML N Law Minister Rana Sanaullah must be held accountable for his continued support and soft stance for Taliban’s urban affiliates like ASWJ-LeJ and Jaish e Mohammad.
https://lubpak.com/archives/345647