Monday, December 21, 2015

'Hell No' Hillary Clinton Won't Apologize to Trump Over ISIS Recruitment Claims, Spokesman Says


  • "Hell no."
    A spokesman for Hillary Clinton said that she won't apologize to Donald Trump for her comments at Saturday night’s debate that he is being used as a recruiting tool for ISIS and is featured in ISIS videos.
    Trump said Monday on the "Today" show that he “demands an apology” from Clinton.
    “You can be the messenger," Trump told Matt Lauer on the "Today" show. "I will demand an apology from Hillary. She should apologize.”
    "She lies about emails," Trump continued. "She lies about Whitewater. She lies about everything. She will be a disaster as president of the United States."
    On Monday, Clinton's spokesman, Brian Fallon said "hell no" -- she won't apologize.
    "Hillary Clinton will not be apologizing to Donald Trump for correctly pointing out how his hateful rhetoric only helps ISIS recruit more terrorists," he said.
    Clinton came under heavy criticism from fact-checkers when she said at Saturday night's debate that ISIS is “showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists.” White House and National Security Council officials told ABC News they are unaware of any examples of ISIS including Trump in the terrorist group's videos.
    Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton's communications director, clarified the candidate's remarks yesterday on "This Week With George Stephanopoulos."
    "She’s not referring to a specific video, but he is being used in social media by ISIS as propaganda,” Palmieri explained.
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-demands-apology-clinton-isis-recruitment-claims/story?id=35884351

    Obama Accuses Trump of Exploiting Working-Class Fears











    By 


    President Obama said in a radio interview airing on Monday that Donald J. Trump, a leading contender for the Republican presidential nomination, is exploiting the resentment and anxieties of working-class men to boost his campaign. Mr. Obama also argued that some of the scorn directed at him personally stems from the fact that he is the first African-American to hold the White House.
    Demographic changes and economic stresses, including “flatlining” wages and incomes, have meant that “particularly blue-collar men have had a lot of trouble in this new economy, where they are no longer getting the same bargain that they got when they were going to a factory and able to support their families on a single paycheck,” Mr. Obama said in the interview with National Public Radio.
    You combine those things, and it means that there is going to be potential anger, frustration, fear — some of it justified, but just misdirected,” the president added. “I think somebody like Mr. Trump is taking advantage of that. That’s what he’s exploiting during the course of his campaign.”
    The comments were Mr. Obama’s most pointed response to Mr. Trump since the Republican candidate suggested that Muslims be barred from entering the United States after the mass shooting in San Bernardino, Calif. The attack was carried out by a couple who apparently were radicalized Muslims, one of whom had entered the United States on a fiancée visa.
    In the wide-ranging interview, conducted the day before he left Washington on Friday for a two-week holiday vacation with his family in Hawaii, Mr. Obama defended his approach to taking on the Islamic State. He dismissed the notion that the militant group is an existential threat to the United States even as he conceded that he had received “legitimate criticism” for failing to adequately explain his strategy for confronting it. He also described his view of the anxiety on which Mr. Trump has capitalized, arguing that some voters who voice fears about his presidency and doubts about where Mr. Obama’s loyalties lie are reacting to the fact that he is the first black president.
    “If you are referring to specific strains in the Republican Party that suggest that somehow I’m different, I’m Muslim, I’m disloyal to the country, etc. — which unfortunately is pretty far out there, and gets some traction in certain pockets of the Republican Party, and that have been articulated by some of their elected officials — what I’d say there is that that’s probably pretty specific to me, and who I am and my background,” Mr. Obama told Steve Inskeep, the host of “Morning Edition” on NPR. “In some ways, I may represent change that worries them.”
    “That’s not to suggest that everybody who objects to my policies may not have perfectly good reasons for it,” the president added. He noted, as an example, that voters living in coal-dependent areas may blame him for the loss of their jobs.
    Mr. Obama has struggled to appeal to white voters who do not have a college education, carrying only 36 percent of them when he was re-elected in 2012. Republicans perform particularly well among that group, although it represents a shrinking share of the electorate.
    On the Islamic State, which is also called ISIS or ISIL, Mr. Obama pushed back against criticism of his approach and said he was “confident that we are going to prevail.” “This is a serious challenge — ISIS is a virulent, nasty organization that has gained a foothold in ungoverned spaces effectively in Syria and parts of western Iraq,” Mr. Obama said, referring to attacks the group organized in Paris and apparently inspired in San Bernardino. “But it is also important for us to keep things in perspective, and this is not an organization that can destroy the United States.” He also suggested that heavy coverage of the media-savvy extremist group by news outlets chasing viewership had contributed to the public anxiety that has dragged down his approval ratings on the issue. “If you’ve been watching television for the last month, all you have been seeing, all you have been hearing about is these guys with masks or black flags who are potentially coming to get you,” Mr. Obama said. “And so I understand why people are concerned about it.” Asked whether news organizations had been manipulated by the Islamic State, he added: “Look, the media is pursuing ratings. This is a legitimate news story.”
    He rejected critiques from Republican presidential candidates who have suggested “carpet bombing” the group, as well as the suggestion by Hillary Clinton, his party’s leading presidential candidate, that the United States establish a “no-fly zone” over Syria. He argued that doing so would require substantial ground troops and would fail to damage the Islamic State, which does not have an air force.
    Still, the president said his administration had not done enough to explain its strategy and promote its successes in carrying it out.
    “There is a legitimate criticism of what I’ve been doing and our administration has been doing in the sense that we haven’t, you know, on a regular basis, I think, described all the work that we’ve been doing for more than a year now to defeat ISIL,” Mr. Obama said. On domestic matters, Mr. Obama said he was concerned that a recent uptick in campus protests around the country, in which students have shone a spotlight on racial misunderstandings, has in some cases shut down important debates.
    “I think it’s a healthy thing for young people to be engaged, and to question authority,” Mr. Obama said. “I do think that there have been times on college campuses where I get concerned that the unwillingness to hear other points of view can be as unhealthy on the left as on the right.”
    He cited as examples student protests last year of planned appearances by Christine Lagarde, the head of the International Monetary Fund, at Smith College, and Condoleezza Rice, the former secretary of state, at Rutgers University that led both women to withdraw.
    “Feel free to disagree with somebody,” the president said, “but don’t try to just shut them up.”

    Video - President Obama's Interview With NPR's Steve Inskeep - December 2015

    Video - Steve Harvey mistakenly crowns the wrong Miss Universe 2015 (Epic Fail)

    Afghan music Video - Hafiz Karwandgar

    The futile, tragic war in Afghanistan achieved nothing







    It's that time of year when we draw a breath and think back to our accomplishments over the past year. Framing our lives in periods of 365 days seems natural. That's unfortunate, because sometimes it's necessary to choose another frame of reference if you want to make sense of the world. So let's change our perspective and see if it makes a difference. 
    On this day two years ago, the headlines were full of hope for Afghanistan. Aussie troops had just pulled out of the provincial capital of Tarin Kowt​ and our last commander, Wade Stolhard, was upbeat. He can still be heard, on a defence video, insisting the Afghan soldiers were effective, ready, and in the lead conducting independent operations. Have a listen. You'll see how otherwise sensible, intelligent people can get sucked in by what they want to believe. 
    We know he was speaking rubbish because a United States think-tank has now confirmed that rebels effectively control the province. The Institute for the Study of War insists that, with the single exception of the provincial capital, the territory outside the wire is completely dominated by the Taliban. The report suggests not only do the militants "likely exercise de facto control in the vicinity of the provincial capital" but also the central government has no chance of recovering territory. It faces too many internal threats. 

    The situation is now so dire that the government is reduced to boasting about its ability to withdraw. It recently trumpeted a "complex operation" by four special forces helicopters flying under cover of darkness to evacuate a beleaguered outpost in Khas Uruzgan​. The mission was successful and reported to sound like a triumph, yet it seems unlikely that the Taliban were fooled. They occupied the village. 
    In fact most of the fighting in the province over the past two months has been between rival Taliban factions, one loyal to the movement's new titular commander, Mullah Akhtar Mansour​ and the other reporting to an Islamic State-aligned affiliate. This group's former leader, Mullah Rassoul Akhund​, was killed by the Taliban when he was discovered in a village to the south of Uruzgan in mid-November. Unfortunately his faction lives on and peace is as far away as ever. It's a complex narrative of small, deadly squabbles and missed opportunities. 
    The War Memorial received just under $13 million in the last budget to produce an official history of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the intervention in East Timor. Director Brendan Nelson hoped the official history would be of "a standard befitting the service of the men and women whose service it records". 
    Nelson thinks the Diggers deserve a history. I do too, but I reckon we owe them the real truth: there have been too many myths. This war has been a futile, tragic, waste. Perhaps there was a time when something could have been salvaged and stability could have been restored, but that would have required a political solution, not a military one. This was never going to happen: George Bush made sure of that. He believed the West would prevail; his team brushed aside the traditional Afghan way of doing things. No shura (councils) or consensus for him. He applied a Western, US framework to a Central Asian situation – why were we surprised it didn't work?
    And we Australians made the same mistake in Uruzgan. We backed a corrupt, illiterate hard-man as police chief because we thought it was better to have him on our side than against us. He eliminated his rivals and became indispensable, the most feared (and hated) man in the province. It was, of course, just a matter of time before someone got rid of him and earlier this year he died in a hail of bullets. If the history is written properly, some reputations are going to be badly bruised. This won't be a simple story of mateship and heroism. It's a story of how, a century after Gallipoli, we've now graduated to making our own blunders. 
    As recently as December, 2013, the defence video clips were wildly optimistic. The propaganda suggested the deployment was "mission accomplished". Perhaps the fact no independent media was present to report the ceremony should have alerted us to the fragile, transitory nature of the gains. Tony Abbott insisted the terrible cost of the involvement in the Middle East – 40 Australian dead and 261 wounded, together with the "thousands who will carry the psychological injuries for many years to come" – had been worth it.
    "That sacrifice has not been in vain", he said, cataloguing a list of accomplishments such as schools built, roads opened and medical facilities operating. "Uruzgan today is a very significantly different and better place than it was a decade ago," he said. You couldn't say that and maintain your credibility today. It's not really possible for a reporter to assert the former PM's wrong. We assume they have more information and expert advice. They do. But they also have their own agenda and sometimes truth gets in the way of whatever yarn it is they're trying to spin. That's why politicians and journalists are both actually in the same business: attempting to make up plausible stories to convince people (voters; readers) that we understand what's going on. But we're still stumbling around in the dark because often the only way you can make sense of what's happening is when you look backwards. 
    That's the case with Afghanistan. More than 25,000 Australians served in Afghanistan at a total cost of more than $7.5 billion. There's no body count for the Afghans but thousands must have been killed in our area of operations alone. All for nothing. It's no wonder the government dragged its feet in appointing a war historian for the conflict. The story of a loss is always difficult to explain away. 


    Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/comment/afghanistan-all-for-nothing-20151220-gls9sb.html#ixzz3uzDcUDCx
    Follow us: @theage on Twitter | theageAustralia on Facebook

    Why a fractured Taliban is endangering the U.S. mission in Afghanistan







    By Shawn Snow

    The conflict in Afghanistan is entering a new, even more chaotic chapter. On Monday, the six U.S. service members were killed in an apparent suicide attack in Bagram province. Meanwhile, the Islamic State has a growing presence in the country. And a dangerous power struggle has emerged within the Taliban.
    Early this month, rumors of the demise of the Taliban Supreme Leader, Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, sent shockwaves through the region. Mansour was supposedly injured in a shooting between rival factions of Taliban at a meeting in Quetta, Pakistan, dampening the prospect of peace talks between the central government in Kabul and the Taliban.
    A supposed audio message from Mansour was distributed days later, an attempt to allay concerns among Taliban supporters of Mansour. But the rumor of his death or injury continues to precipitate among key members of the Afghan government, including chief executive Abdullah Abdullah, who on December 7, reiterated that the Taliban leader was indeed injured in a shootout.
    Whatever the truth, the Taliban is becoming more fractured, which could lead it to become more violent and unstable—right as the Obama administration is trying to adjust its course in the planned withdrawal of American forces from Afghanistan.
    The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, General John F. Campbell, stated before a Senate hearing in October that the United States needs a new plan for Afghanistan, and he stressed that the political and strategic dynamics within the country have changed within the last year, including the rise of ISIS and the death of Taliban leader Mullah Omar that halted peace talks this summer. A recent US government report found the security situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated from June 2015 through November 2015.
    And things are likely to remain messy while competing factions of the Taliban continue fighting with one another over Omar’s rightful successor. It is believed that since the death of the reclusive leader, Mullah Omar, the Taliban has divided into three main factions between Mullah Mansour, the former deputy to Mullah Omar; Mullah Mohammad Rassoul Noorzai, a battlefield commander in Zabul province; and Maulavi Abdul Jalil, former deputy foreign minister of the Taliban.
    Once hailed as the answer to Afghanistan’s divisive ethnic landscape, and the chaotic period that proceeded the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan, the Taliban are no longer viewed as a monolithic entity capable of uniting Afghans under a religious identity. The discovery of Mullah Omar’s death in 2013, the mythologized Robin Hood of Afghanistan, has ended the Taliban’s identity as Afghanistan’s unifying entity.
    Fractured movements tend to prolong conflicts. This is evident with contemporary conflicts around the globe from Yemen, Syria, and Libya. Competing interests and fights over financing and access to resources cause fractured groups to fight amongst each other, increasing paranoia and anxiety over the other groups’ motives and capabilities. Meanwhile, the groups continue fighting the government, a situation that’s become increasingly evident in Afghanistan. 
    Recent claims of clashes in Nangahar, Zabul, and Helmand provinces between Mansour’s forces and Rassoul’s have reportedly resulted in the deathof a prominent battlefield commander loyal to Rassoul, Mullah Mansoor Dadullah. Large numbers of villagers have fled from Herat province as internal fighting between commanders loyal to Rassoul and Mansour continues unabated.
    The internal infighting, coupled with the central government’s desire to reach a peace settlement will likely make competition between the Taliban factions more violent. Attempts to seize large population centers, such as the temporary fall of Kunduz, or daring attacks on major installations like the recent siege on Kandahar airfield, may become more frequent, as competing groups look to gain supporters and consolidate power before a possible peace settlement.
    The White House is slowly adapting to these rapid changes in the region. With the visit of the Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, and the PakistaniArmy chief, General Raheel Sharif, in October and November of this year, the Obama administration is underscoring the importance of regional cooperation and the role Pakistan will play in creating peace in the region. For the upcoming fighting season the U.S. government will need to maintain its steady assistance militarily to Afghan forces, while at the same time pressuring the Pakistani government to support reconciliation between moderate Taliban forces still connected to Islamabad and the Kabul based government.
    The implications for the Pentagon are far reaching. Signs of increased Special Forces operations in southern Helmand province may indicate that the White House and Pentagon are willing to go beyond the stated mission of “train, advise, and assist” to thwart Taliban advances. A loss of Helmand province would provide the Taliban with a strategic foothold in the south, access to opium for financing operations, and would provide a strong bargaining chip for anti-government forces in any peace negotiations.
    An increased combat role by U.S. forces may provide a well needed morale boost to the fledgling Afghan security forces that witnessed record casualtiesthis fighting season, and buy time for the Afghan Air Force to rebuild and field its new close-air support platform, the A-29 Super Turcano, this coming spring. A stronger and more active combat role in Afghanistan could convince potential Taliban defectors and splinter groups to support the central government.

    A stronger and more active combat role in Afghanistan could convince potential Taliban defectors and splinter groups to support the central government. But at least as important is understanding who is fighting whom within the Taliban. Only when those conflicts subside will there be some semblance of peace in the region.

    NATO reports six foreign soldiers killed in Afghanistan

    Six US soldiers have been killed in an attack near Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan. Just hours later, three rockets reportedly struck a Kabul area, one of the missiles landing near the US embassy.
    US army personnel ride in a truck inside an Afghan military base
    The soldiers were on patrol when a suicide bomber on a motorbike laden with explosives rammed into them, NATO confirmed on Monday,
    A US official confirmed that all six casualties were American soldiers, adding that two more American troops were wounded.
    The soldiers were patrolling in Bagram, the largest US base left in the country, some 40 km (25 miles) north of the Afghani capital.
    News agency AP said it had received an email with information that the Taliban had claimed responsibility for the attack.
    Helmand on razor's edge
    Also on Monday, the Reuters news agency reported that three missiles hit a government district in Kabul, with one of them landing near the US Embassy entrance on Masoud Square.
    No details were immediately available on casualties or damage, the report said, citing police sources.
    The latest incident comes only days after a siege near the Spanish embassy left two Spaniards and at least four Afghan police dead.
    The Taliban have boosted their attacks along with the intense clashes between Taliban and government security forces in Afghanistan's southern province of Helmand.
    The clashes have accounted for the deaths of at least 90 government troops as Taliban fighters appear to be on the verge of taking control of the province.

    http://www.dw.com/en/nato-reports-six-foreign-soldiers-killed-in-afghanistan/a-18932482

    Pakistan - Punjab government’s pint-sized Christmas grant not enough for Punjab’s swollen Christian population

    Punjab government’s petite Christmas grant just not enough for province’s swollen Christian population.
    According to details, as Christmas 2015 inches close, Punjab government announced a Christmas grant of 30 million Rupees. The provincial government has sanctioned this grant to be distributed to the Christian community in Punjab. However, this announcement has met with strong criticism from Christians as the claim that Punjab’s Christian population has enlarged since 1998 to a great extent. Seeing that Punjab government still considers’ the stats of 1998 census valid and has apportioned a petite grant, Christians are reacting strongly claiming that only a few Christians will be benefited by this grant.
    According to the official notification, this pay-out will be made according to the census of 1998. In this regard, the Finance Department has issued a summary of this year’s Christmas grant. The Finance Department’s summary states that a total of 5,000 Rupees will be given 6,000 Christian families across Punjab. After this announcement, the Christian community of Punjab has expressed strong resentment over the fact that the provincial government had allocated a meagre amount for them.
    While speaking in this regard, Riaz Anjum- Chairman of Pakistan Christian Movement (PCM) said that a small amount of Rs 5,000 per family is simply insufficient if you bear in mind that there has been a significant rise in inflation levels in the last few years.
    Riaz Anjum further stated that the disbursement of amount according to the census of 1998 is “severe injustice to the Christian community and a violation of their rights.” He said that the Punjab government was intentionally not airing the actual figures pertaining to current Christian population in Punjab. He further alleges that Punjab government is doing so out of fear that Punjab’s Christian community would begin seeking its due rights.
    Additionally, Shunila Ruth from Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Member of Punjab Assembly on the minority seat said that 5,000 Rupees per family is not enough the amount should be increased to at least 10,000 Rupees per family. She added that there have been instances that the amount announced for Christmas; was actually disbursed around Easter. What is more, the about 400 deserving Christian families in Lahore did not receive the money of the announced grant.
    PTI’s Asif Sohail Khokhar, who recently got elected from Youhanabad said that the Christian population of Youhanabad alone was over 200,000. “The government’s claim that there were only 350,000 Christians in the whole city is ridiculous. The government must ensure to disburse the amount before Christmas.”
    - See more at: http://www.christiansinpakistan.com/punjab-governments-pint-sized-christmas-grant-not-enough-for-punjabs-swollen-christian-population/#sthash.0Pc9wQKP.dpuf

    Pakistan - ASSISTANTS OF TERROR: HOW WOMEN RAISE FUNDS FOR DA’ISH IN KARACHI

    It all started with a request. Short and simple. “Aap se darkhwast hai [We’re making a request to you]”. And that was enough. It was a code, used by Islamic State-inspired militants to raise funds for their activities in the metropolitan city.
    The women’s wing of the Middle Eastern terror outfit was mainly responsible for generating funds. Once the money had been collected, the women would give it to the male members of the group, who then passed it on to their head honchos. Another code came into play when the middle man came to receive the money. “Amanat de do [Please return the keepsake],” he would say. These words were enough.
    Women’s role
    The women’s wing usually met at The Faith Academy school. “They [women] sent darkhwasts [requests] to well-off women, seeking donations for IS by using the name of the school,” explained an official of the Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD). “After collecting the money, they used to hand it over to the male wing of the outfit,” he added. “Then Adil Butt, the recently-arrested CEO of the College of Accounting and Management Sciences (CAMS) used to hand over the funds to a person, identified as Omar, alias Jalal Chandio, who used the code word ‘Amanat de do’.”
    On Friday, CTD in-charge Raja Omar Khattab uncovered a group of women tasked by the militant group to arrange for marriages of their operatives and also raise funds for their activities. Though there are around a dozen women in this group, six of them were particularly active in collecting funds from different parts of the city. Three of them are accused of abetting the Safoora bus carnage in May, 2015.
    One of them is the wife of Omar alias Jalal Chandio, a key suspect of the Safoora attack, while another is the spouse of Adil Butt. The latter was arrested on December 2 from his residence in the Defence Housing Authority for his alleged role in the assault.
    Arrests likely
    CTD officials are likely to arrest the wife of Safoora attack mastermind Saad Aziz and other women affiliated with the IS-inspired group operating in the metropolis. “We were delaying the arrests because they are women,” said a CTD official. “But now the stage has come to arrest them. The women will be detained at the CTD’s detention centre where women police will be deployed round the clock.”
    Officials claim the women’s wing is being operated by the families, particularly the wives of the suspects arrested in connection with the Safoora carnage and other terrorist attacks in Karachi.
    Aziz’s wife and mother-in-law are key suspects in the case. So are the wives of retired PIA engineer Khalid Yousuf Bari, who was also arrested for his involvement in the attack, and Mufti Tauseef, who is an absconder in the case. Bari’s wife, along with the wife of Mufti Tauseef, and some other women are operating a strong network, said the official. But the key role lies with Bari’s wife.
    “Bari’s wife has a vital role in generating funds and brainwashing well-off women to garner support for IS. She also organised Aziz’s wedding,” said an official. Forensic experts are examining the laptops, cell phones and other valuables to get more evidence.
    “Bari’s wife also used to run an organisation – Idara al Zakra Academy – comprising around 20 women who used to generate funds in the names of donations, zakat and khairat for the terror outfit,” explained CTD in-charge Raja Omar Khattab. “Their other responsibility is to recruit women into the organisation through sermons and videos about IS by distributing USBs,” he added.

    http://www.shiitenews.org/index.php/pakistan/item/20216-assistants-of-terror-how-women-raise-funds-for-da-ish-in-karachi

    Pakistan - Balochistan - Educational Emergency: Poor State of Schools in Nok Kundi

    Hassan Baloch
    Schools at Nok Kundi are in a poor condition and the classrooms in some schools can collapse anytime. This was revealed by a group of journalists who visited three different schools in Nok Kundi on Monday.
    Staff reporter of Balochistan Point was also a part of the delegation.
    Balochistan is under an educational emergency since January 2014 and government has spent huge amount of resources on the promotion of the campaign.
    High school of Nok Kundi, which was established 10 years ago, has vacancies of four general, one science and one computer teacher. It was also revealed that the classrooms of the school are in poor state and can collapse anytime.
    Middle school of Nok Kundi has total strength of 270 and there are no sufficient classrooms for students.
    “Our students have no choice but to study in open sky without any furniture,” said Mohi-ud-Din Notezai who is the headmaster of the school. He added that the formal notification of the school is still awaited.
    Primary School of Killi Mengal Abad has strength of 105 and there is only one appointed teacher. The school premise doesn’t have any boundary wall and it’s a cause of inconvenience for students, journalist’s delegation learnt.
    Residents of Nok Kundi, while talking to journalists, have urged Chief Secretary and Provincial Ombudsman to take steps to solve the problems of all three schools.

    Pakistan - Gas crisis worsens in Punjab

    With an increased demand for natural gas amid dipping temperatures, the gas crisis is worsening in Punjab and Islamabad as low pressure, coupled with unscheduled loadshedding, has forced citizens in many urban areas to use firewood.
    In several cities, women came on the roads and streets holding kitchen utensils toprotests. And the situation isn’t different in Quetta where it is a yearly routine for the locals to brave the extreme cold without gas to fire their heaters.
    The citizens resorted to protest for expressing their anger in various cities of Punjab including Lahore where different areas - Iqbal Town, Baghbanpura, Harbanspura, Faisal Town, Shahdarah and others - are experiencing low gas pressure and loadshedding. Sources say gas pressure is normal in the posh localities only, while citizens, especially women, protested against the government.
    They said that gas shortage had badly disturbed daily routine as they were neither able to cook food nor had hot water amid cold weather.Protests were also reported from Gujranwala, Sahiwal, Nankana, Sheikhupura, Gojra and other towns and cities. In Sargodha, around 60 percent areas are without gas supply.
    The gas shortage affected consumers as they threatened to besiege the gas office in Lahore. The gas loadshedding also affected the higher authorities of Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited (SNGPL). During the past week, gas supply remained almost suspended to the houses of SNGPL higher officials. In this regard, the Lahore region GM Mehmood Zia was taken to task for non-supply of gas to the houses of the higher authorities. Various attempts were made to contact Mehmood Zia for his version, but he was not available.
    Gas shortage has also started affecting various parts of Karachi, including Gulistan-e-Jauhar, Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Garden and old city areas.
    The Sui Southern Gas Company said that pressure could not be increased on gas pipelines as these lines were very old and had rusted. The company said that more pressure could cause leakages in the pipelines.
    On the other hand, power loadshedding also continued in Lahore even on Sunday, the weekly holiday. Owing to annual closure of canals, production of hydel power has decreased to a large extent. Now, besides other cities and towns of Punjab, Lahore is also experiencing night-time loadshedding for long hours. Currently, big cities in Punjab are facing 10 hours of power loadshedding and the rural areas facing up to 14 hours of outages.

    Pakistan - Looking back: Number of out of school children unchanged, says report




    The number of children out of school across the Punjab province did not decrease between 2014 and 2015, according to a survey by Annual Status of Education Report (ASER). The survey found that 15 per cent of children remained out of the education system.
    The survey, taken in all 36 districts, covered 21,512 households in 1,079 villages. It collected information on 59,179 children. The survey was conducted for children between the ages of three and 16 years. Of these, 50,686 children were tested for language and arithmetic competencies.
    According to the findings of the survey, 15 per cent of children were reported out-of-school. The survey report said 8 per cent had never been enrolled and 7 per cent had dropped out.
    The survey found that of the remaining 85 per cent children, 65 per cent were enrolled at public schools, 35 per cent of children at private institutions. Boys outnumber girls at public schools with 60 per cent enrolment. In private schools, the student body comprised of 58 per cent boys and 42 per cent girls.
    The ASER survey found that the rate of enrolment decreased compared to last year. The survey showed that 53 per cent of all school-aged children were enrolled in schools, compared to 55 per cent in 2014. As many as 47 per cent children between the age group of three to five years were not enrolled in any pre-school programme or a school.
    The survey also looked at learning outcomes. The report said learning levels had improved. This year, 30 per cent of the students of grade three could not write a grade two story in Urdu compared to 37 per cent in 2014.
    The ASER report said that 73 per cent students of class three could not read a story in Urdu, which was similar to 73 per cent in the previous year. The report said that 29 per cent students of class one could not read letters in Urdu compared to 31 per cent in 2014.
    English language learning showed some improvement. Nearly 40 per cent students of class five could not read sentences of class two, compared to 43 per cent in the previous year.
    Out of the surveyed children, 32 per cent children enrolled in class one could not read capital letters, as compared to 34 per cent in 2014.
    The report said 41 per cent students of grade five could not perform two-digit division compared to 49 per cent in 2014.
    Children enrolled in private schools were found to be performing better than those in public schools. The survey found that 76 per cent children enrolled in grade five of a private school were able to read a story in Urdu compared to 67 per cent of class five children enrolled in government schools.
    English learning levels of private schools were also found to be better than in public schools. The survey found that 67 per cent of class five children in private schools could read sentences, whereas only 57 per cent children of government schools children could read the same.
    Boys outperformed girls in literacy and numeracy skills.
    Among the tested children, 56 per cent boys and 54 per cent girls could read sentences in Urdu. The survey found that 57 per cent boys could read words in English, while 55 per cent of girls could do the same. Similarly, 54 per cent boys were able to perform subtraction, whereas only 51 per cent girls could do the same exercise.
    The survey found 28 per cent teachers at government schools had completed graduation, compared to the 37 per cent at private schools.
    It showed that 80 per cent government high schools had computer labs and 85 per cent had libraries. In comparison, 26 per cent private high schools had computer labs and 53 per cent had libraries.

    Pakistan - FATA's Christians 'snubbed' at president's annual Christmas dinner











    By Iftikhar Firdous

    In a first in over a decade, Christians from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) will not be able to attend the annual Christmas dinner at the President House scheduled for today (Monday).
    The tightly knit, small Christian community in the tribal areas has been silently protesting against the decision of the President House for not sending invitations with some even contacting government officials over the apparent snub but to no avail.
    Wilson Wazir, who was appointed as one of the first minority Maliks (tribal elder) earlier in June this year, told The Express Tribune that it was for the first time in more than a decade that the Christians from Fata were not invited for the official dinner.
    “It gives the community a feeling of being outcasts. I have attended 12 Christmas dinners over the years but this time we have been left out,” he lamented.
    At least two other elders from the community also claimed they had not been invited for the event. When they asked for the official reason, they were told that they had not been given security clearance.
    When contacted, an official from the Ministry of Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony told The Express Tribune that the security clearance of Fata’s Christians had not been received from the concerned departments. “We could not send them invitations without official approbation,” the official said requesting anonymity as he was not authorised to speak.
    “I am uncertain as to why we are being alienated without any reason” said Wilson Wazir, holder of Sitara-e-Imtiaz, the third highest civil award, which was awarded to him in March this year in recognition of his services for minorities.
    Wazir appealed to Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) Governor Sardar Mehtab Ahmed Khan Abbasi to intervene and help the community to feel more at home.
    Around 15 to 20 invitations are sent every year to Christians living in Fata to attend the Christmas dinner in Islamabad. There are an estimated 15,000 Christians in Fata, majority of which have been living there for centuries. Their churches are mostly located inside the political compounds, structures from the colonial era.
    This year, after a struggle of decades, minorities were finally offered equal status as the rest of the tribesmen. The decision was partially aimed at addressing the grievances of non-Muslims in the area who had been subjected to constant fear by various militant outfits and at times threatened to migrate to other areas.

    Mystery remains over existence of Islamic State in Pakistan



    After months of denying the existence of the Islamic State militant group in Pakistan, federal authorities seem to have finally accepted that the Middle Eastern terrorist outfit is gaining a foothold in the country.

    According to a list of militant outfits proscribed by the Ministry of Interior Affairs, the Islamic State– also known by its Arabic acronym of Da’ish – was banned in July. The list was shared by the country’s security czar in the parliament last week.

    Considering the official stance, the government has banned the militant group without the group’s presence in the country. The list shows the outfit was proscribed on July 15, making it the only one to have been banned in the aftermath of the Army Public School Peshawar massacre of December last year.

    The last group to be banned was the Jeay Sindh Muttahida Mahaz on March 15, 2013. The Hafiz Saeed-led Jamaatud Dawa happens to be under observation since December 1, 2005. So has the government is finally acknowledged the presence of the militant outfit by banning it? “This is contradictory to the previous statements of the government that IS does not exist in Pakistan or it is not operating in Pakistan,” said Ashraf Jahangir Qazi, former ambassador to the US and former head of Institute of Strategic Studies in Islamabad. “The government issues contradictory statements all the time. There is nothing new here.”

    He said it is not necessary the militant group had been operating in the country and the government may just be echoing the narrative of the US. “This is a straight-forward regional, sectarian fight with one of the richest countries supporting all the Sunni extremists and then Iran, on the other hand, supporting the others,” Ashraf said.

    “This is their fight and it has reached Pakistan and we follow what we are told whether it’s consistent or not,” he said. Maintaining its official stance, the Foreign Office has repeatedly stated that the Islamic State has no footprint in the country, despite reports that some local militant groups have already aligned themselves with the terrorist group, which has established a self-styled caliphate in Syria and Iraq.

    Pakistan - Death toll due to diphtheria reaches 31 in Punjab

    Death toll of children due to break out of diphtheria has reached 31 in Punjab as two more kids passed away in two days in Children Hospital Lahore. Medical experts said the issue could be solved given that the federal government increases facility of immunization.
    Sources said the disease of diphtheria was increasing despite provision of medicines which was resulting in more deaths.
    The recent victims were two little girls, Nimra, eight, and Asia, 12, residents of Lahore, who were under treatment for four days.
    Spokesperson health department said medicines had been provided to all the government hospitals and soon the disease would be controlled.
    http://aaj.tv/2015/12/death-toll-due-to-diphtheria-reaches-31-in-punjab/

    PPP workers and Jiyalas will donate blood across the country on 8th martyrdom anniversary of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto







    Bilawal Bhutto Zardari Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party has announced that PPP workers and Jiyalas will donate blood across the country on 8th martyrdom anniversary of former Prime Minister Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Sunday, December 27. The blood donations collected from all over the country will be given for the injured soldiers of the armed forces in war against terrorism and patient welfare societies.
    Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari will donate blood at Naudero House, in Larkana district along with other central and provincial leaders.
    Bilawal Bhutto will address a huge public meeting at Garhi Khuda Bux on martyrdom anniversary of Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto. Central leaders of PPP will also address on the occasion.
    Party leaders, workers and masses from all over the country will attend the public meeting.

    https://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/2015/12/20/ppp-workers-and-jiyalas-will-donate-blood-across-the-country-on-8th-martyrdom-anniversary-of-shaheed-mohtarma-benazir-bhutto/

    Pakistan - #PPP terms Dar’s statement a mockery to the nation

    Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Senators Dr Karim Khawaja, Ajiz Dhamra and Engineer Gyan Chand while terming the statement of federal finance minister Ishaq Dar on PIA as ridiculous said it was a joke the federal minister has made with the nation and the country.
    In a statement issued from the PPP Media Cell Sindh, they said if Dar believes he is correct then what he would say about a Presidential Ordinance on privatisation of PIA and about a recent statement from the President of Pakistan in which he had said that since Pakistan has borrowed money from the IMF so conditions of the IMF should also be accepted and implemented.
    They said selling 26 percent of shares of the PIA is tantamount to mortgaging this national strategic institution to private contractors. It is same as was seen from privatisation of Karachi Electric, which consequences have affected the people and the country.
    They said the federal government has to withdraw the Presidential Ordinance and the protest being started by the employees of the PIA would be fully supported by the PPP. The PPP would resist all attempts to privatise the PIA. Ishaq Dar should stop deceiving the nation.

    https://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/2015/12/21/ppp-terms-dars-statement-a-mockery-to-the-nation/

    Pakistan - OPPOSITION PARTIES DISCUSS FORMATION OF A GRAND ALLIANCE AGAINST PUNJAB GOVT

    https://ppppunjab.wordpress.com

    In Punjab an opposition coalition is in the offing as Pakistan Peoples Party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Pakistan Muslim League – Quaid (PML-Q), Jamat e Islami and independent Punjab Assembly have discussed the formation of a grand alliance against Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz (PML-N) government.
    The PPP Punjab President Mian Manzoor Ahmad Wattoo has said the opposition parties in the Punjab Assembly, as well as independent members had decided to form a grand alliance against the government.

    In a statement issued from the PPP Punjab secretariat, Mian Manzoor Wattoo has revealed that efforts are underway to form a grand political alliance in Punjab to protest against the government’s anti-people policies.

    “The grand alliance would include the PTI, the PML-Q, the JI and all other independent members in the Punjab Assembly and the talks for the grand alliance are underway on fast track” he added.

    He maintained that the alliance would fully register their protest inside and outside the Punjab assembly, adding that the PMLN government has miserably failed to provide relief to commoner, and its unjust and anti-people policies forced political parties to form a grand opposition alliance in the Punjab Assembly.

    Mian Manzoor Ahmed Wattoo has also said the government was not paying attention to the needs of the citizens, and the government’s cruel tax policy, growing corruption in the Punjab’s departments/offices, political intemperance, energy crises and failure to maintain law and order situation had forced to make a grand alliance. He lambasted the government and stated that people were continuously protesting against the government policies, but it was not ready to change its course. He declared that the PPP would not leave the people of Punjab alone and would stand by them and defend their rights.