Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Afghanistan: Defeat, Despair And A Murky Future

The Taliban Summer Offensive has largely been a failure. The Taliban lost far more men (dead, captured, deserted) than the security forces and failed to gain lasting control of any territory. Moreover the recent announcement that Taliban founder and leader Mullah Omar had died in a Pakistani hospital back in 2013 caused long-standing disagreements among Taliban leaders to turn violent. In the last month there have been several known gun battles between rival Taliban factions. There may have been some assassinations as well because this is a common weapon in such internal disputes. It is believed that one reason for keeping Omar’s death a secret was to keep the peace within the Taliban. The post-revelation splits have caused some factions to switch allegiance to ISIL (Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant) and become even more violent and reckless. This is particularly true of some Taliban and al Qaeda groups who feel restrained by defeat or growing calls for peace from many long-time Islamic terrorist leaders. Going ISIL means more suicidal violence and less regard for killing Moslem women and children (traditionally something Afghan warriors avoided). If Islamic terrorism is a disease ISIL appears to be the terminal phase. Afghanistan is particularly hostile to this sort of thing and one side effect of that is more tips from rural Afghans about where the newly declared ISIL members are. This in turn led to more effective UAV surveillance and more ISIL leaders being found and killed by UAV missile attacks.
The Afghan Army currently has 17 major offensives going on against Islamic terrorists in 16 provinces. Afghan military leaders point out that these operations are most successful when they have American air support and the U.S. has apparently responded to that by quietly sending more warplanes and helicopter gunships to Afghanistan, along with more ground control teams to work with Afghan ground forces.
At the end of July the Afghan Taliban announced the selection of a new leader (Mullah Akhtar Mansour) to replace founder and longtime leader Mullah Omar. Mansour has been the acting head of the Taliban since 2010 because Mullah Omar was said to have health problems. In the last week the Taliban admitted that Omar had been dead since 2013 but have not revealed exactly why his death was concealed. The reason may have been to maintain unity because after the appointment of Mansour was made several Taliban factions went public complaining of how the selection was made. The Afghan Taliban is known to be sharply divided over the subject of peace talks with the Afghan government. Some factions also complain openly that Pakistan (in the form of the ISI) actually controls the Taliban leaders living in Baluchistan under the protection of the ISI. Mansour backs peace talks while Omar was said to have opposed them. The official shift in Taliban leadership caused the resumption of peace talks (between the Taliban and the Afghan government) scheduled for today to be delayed until sometime in the future. Afghanistan is now willing to renew the talks but only if Pakistan is excluded. More Afghans (especially prominent ones) are openly accusing Pakistan of being actively hostile to Afghanistan and backing several Islamic terrorist groups (especially the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani Network) that cause most of the terrorist violence in Afghanistan. Pakistan has always denied this, despite all the evidence, and continues to do so.
So far this year another 50,000 Afghan refugees in Pakistan have returned home. Not all of these returning refugees went voluntarily. Since 2014 there has been increasing anti-Afghan feelings in Pakistan. This led to another effort to persecute and expel several million Afghans living (often illegally) in Pakistan. So far this year over 7,000 such refugees a month are returning from Pakistan. While many of these refugees could evade expulsion efforts over 40 percent of those who return cite growing anti-Afghan attitudes and harassment as the main reason for coming back to Afghanistan. Since 2002 nearly four million of these refugees have returned to Afghanistan. There are still about 2.5 million Afghan refugees in Pakistan and only 60 percent of these are registered.
While Afghanistan wants good relations with Iran Afghan officials are quietly trying to get Iran to back off on its recruitment Afghan Shia to fight in Syria. The main draw is money (up to a thousand dollars a month) and permission to legally settle in Iran if the fighter survives. Iran officially denies this recruiting but there is growing evidence that it exists and is believed to have sent over 3,000 Afghan Shia (many of them illegal immigrants living in Iran) to Syria so far. Many of these Afghans did not survive the experience and the families are angry. Iran has long supported the Shia in Afghanistan. Only 15 percent of Afghans are Shia and these Shia are a particular target for Sunni Islamic terrorists (like the Taliban). Most of these Shia are the Hazara, who are ten percent of the population and the descendants of the hated Mongols who conducted several invasions during the 13th and 14th centuries and destroyed more of the country and its population than any other conquerors. For centuries Hazara have suffered a lot of discrimination and actual violence in Afghanistan.
Since NATO forces left in 2014 a lot of Afghans have lost hope. This can be seen in the number of Afghans applying for passports. In the last year the number has gone from about a thousand a day to as high as 7,000 a day. Currently the daily average is about 5,000 a day. Most of these people are not coming back and use one of the growing number of smuggling gangs to get them to the West. Those without the money for this try to legally enter a neighboring country and head for a city and seek employment.
August 31, 2015: The NDS (National Directorate of Security) revealed it had recently arrested 30 members of the Haqqani Network and the Taliban who were planning another 13 terror attacks in Kabul. The NDS has been around since 2002 and is often called the Afghan CIA. While the NDS does a lot of same intel work as the CIA it is part of the Defense Ministry and also functions like the American FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) as well. The NDS has over 20,000 personnel including many former Islamic terrorists as well as Russian trained operatives (from the 1980s when there was a pro-Russian national government). Over the last three months the NDS has arrested nearly 600 people suspected of Islamic terrorist activity and seized over 16 tons of explosives plus other bomb making components, weapons and much else.
The U.S. Embassy has advised Americans in Afghanistan to consider leaving the country because of the increased efforts by Islamic terrorists and gangsters to kidnap (or just kill) foreigners. The gangsters want to take foreigners for the ransom potential while the Islamic terrorists want to kill foreigners to force foreigners out of the country. The government relies on foreigners (air workers and contractors) to keep the economy going and handle high-tech equipment.
August 29, 2015: In the capital there were two large explosions that, at first, were believed to be terror attacks. But after a while media realized that there were no casualties and that it was actually military explosives experts detonating large terrorist bombs that were too unstable to dismantle and were instead detonated after evacuating all people in the area. The police complained that they should have been notified so they would not have had to dispatch emergency forces to what at first was believed to be another terror attack.
In the south (Helmand) security forces drove the Taliban out of a district (Musa Qala) near the Pakistan border. A large Taliban force had taken the district on the 25th. This was mainly a publicity stunt. Taking control of a district is a popular attention-getter. Seizing control of a remote district or just the district capital is not that hard. The remoteness of some of these towns means it takes a few days, or weeks, for the security forces to get enough troops into the area to chase the Taliban out. “Capturing a district capital” is always good for a headline in foreign media because the foreigners don’t really understand that a lot of these district capitals are small towns in remote areas that few Afghans care about. The Taliban, or local drug gangs only have a meaningful amount of control in a few of the 373 districts (each of the 34 provinces is composed of districts). The Taliban are active in 10-15 percent of districts, mainly in the south (Helmand and Kandahar, where most of the heroin is produced) and the east (where many Pakistan/ISI supported Islamic terrorist groups operate). The Taliban suffered several hundred casualties in taking, defending (for three days) and losing Musa Qala. It is unclear if the Taliban leaders felt it was worth the losses. It appears that control of Musa Qala was considered essential to maintaining opium and heroin production. Similar Taliban offensives in the north (the Tajik border) and the east (the Pakistani border) were for securing smuggling routes to get the drugs safely out of the country where they could be sold for a lot more than Afghan addicts will pay.
August 26, 2015: The U.S. has sent 90 SOCOM (Special Operations Command) troops to Helmand in the south. The SOCOM force includes ground control teams to provide precision air support for Afghan soldiers and police. The Taliban has become particularly active and aggressive in Helmand and more air support greatly increases Taliban casualties. Elsewhere in the south two men in Afghan army uniforms opened fire on some U.S. troops, killing two of them. This brings the number of American troops killed in Afghanistan so far this year to four. These “insider attacks” peaked in 2012 when there were 47 of them, which killed 62.
In the east (Nangarhar province) American UAVs used missiles to kill four Taliban leaders.
August 24, 2015: In the west (Badghis province) police raided an Islamic terrorist hideout and arrested three of four suicide bombers who were staying there. One of the bombers got away. The four were part of a larger group of Taliban who were going to attack the home of First Vice President Abdul Rashid Dostum. This comes three days after about thirty Taliban ambushed a convoy Dostum was in. The attack failed and eight Taliban were killed and 13 captured. Dostum has been a foe of the Taliban since the 1990s. Dostum is a powerful Uzbek politician, and a long time warlord (he was a general in the communist army that was dissolved in 1992). The Uzbeks are Turks, and comprise nine percent of the population. The Uzbeks have always been hostile to the Taliban and drugs. Dostum is their leader but has become popular will most anti-Islamic terror Afghans. Dostum makes the most of this by regularly giving speeches condemning Islamic terrorism. This involves constantly travelling and exposing himself to terrorist attack. So far he has survived dozens of attacks and this increases popularity while enraging the Islamic terrorists he publicly berates and condemns.   
In the north (Kunduz) an American air strike killed the leader of Jundullah, a Pakistani Taliban, faction that switched to ISIL in late 2014. Three Jundullah sub-commanders were also killed in this strike.
August 19, 2015: The newly proclaimed leader of the Taliban openly reaffirmed Taliban allegiance to al Qaeda and opposition to ISIL.
August 17, 2015: In central Afghanistan (Wardak Province) two separate U.S. UAV attacks left seven Islamic terrorists dead.
In Kabul a female German aid worker was kidnapped by unidentified gunmen.
August 14, 2015: In Afghanistan a senior official (First Vice President Abdul Rashid Dostum) publicly repeated what many Afghans have been saying; the Pakistan continues to support Islamic terrorists operating in Afghanistan.

Viewpoint: Ghani is running out of options in Afghanistan




Ahmed Rashid

Afghanistan is in dire crisis as the Taliban battle a weak government, and peace talks with the militants are put on hold, writes guest columnist Ahmed Rashid.
The Taliban have captured most of Helmand province, including for several days a strategic district headquarters, Musa Qala. They are growing stronger in the north and east holding more territory than ever before and mounting ferocious attacks in Kabul in which some 100 people have been killed in the past few weeks.
Talks between Afghanistan and the Taliban and Pakistan are at an impasse following the recent announcement of the death of Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar in 2013. Afghan criticism of Pakistan for allegedly not reining in the Taliban is increasing daily.
President Ashraf Ghani's approval rating has fallen from 50 percentage points to 38, while his partner in power Abdullah Abdullah's ratings are even lower, according to Tolo news. The government is paralysed, apparently incapable of still filling empty slots in the cabinet, while key projects such as identity cards and electoral reforms are on hold and mired in controversy.
The government has failed to tackle corruption or bolster the economy. There is large-scale capital flight, especially to the Gulf where many Afghans have bought houses. Afghans constitute the third largest group of migrants after Syrians and Iraqis trying to escape into Europe by land and sea.
The international community is delaying or withholding vital financial contributions to a government that has long run out of money. Some government salaries have not been paid for months.
Afghanistan's army is heroically struggling to contain the Taliban and hanging on to district capitals but is incapable of going on the offensive or regaining lost territory. Officers are struggling to contain sizeable desertions from the army and police by refusing home leave. The casualty rates are the worst ever and according to US officers, "unsustainable". The remaining US and Nato forces are expected to leave at the end of the year.
According to the New York Times, about 4,100 Afghan soldiers and police have been killed and another 7,800 wounded in the first six months of this year. That is 50% more than the same period last year. Meanwhile warlordism is back with a vengeance as leading figures from the 1980s jihad (holy war), including Vice President Rashid Dostum, Balkh province Governor Atta Mohammed Nur and others raise militia armies across the country.
The country's best hope in years - opening talks with the Taliban - has been stymied by the leaking of Mullah Omar's death. Pakistan and some Taliban leaders tried to keep it secret for unknown reasons until the news broke after the first meeting between the Taliban and Afghan officials in Pakistan on 7 July.
Mullah Omar's death has created a struggle for power within the Taliban and there is a growing conviction amongst many ordinary Afghans that Pakistan is trying to install its chosen favourite, Mullah Akhtar Mohammed Mansour, as the new Taliban leader.
It also became clear that Jalaluddin Haqqani, a leading jihadi figure wanted for terrorism by the US and a major Taliban operative also died a year ago.
This lack of transparency has destroyed the trust between Afghanistan and Pakistan. In his opening address to the Taliban, Mullah Mansour took a belligerent stance, dismissing talks about peace as "enemy propaganda". Before that he was seen as a moderate figure.
Meanwhile in Kabul, new anti-Ghani groupings are emerging, especially among those who resent the president surrounding himself with fellow Ghilzai Pashtuns.
In conversations with many Afghans over the last few months there seems to be a growing consensus that Afghanistan's internal sovereignty is at stake and that the national unity government has not worked. Many feel constitutional changes are urgently needed in order to prevent the disintegration of the country, a coup by one or more warlords or a section of the army, or a power grab by disgruntled politicians.
One popular solution being hotly debated by Afghan intellectuals and politicians is for President Ghani to call an emergency loya jirga that would choose an interim government and president for a period of no more than a few months. Such a grand assembly would then initiate debate and pass constitutional and electoral reforms, as President Ghani and Mr Abdullah had promised to do when they were installed as joint power holders in the national unity government.
These reforms would introduce constitutional amendments to make the country a parliamentary democracy - something that the non-Pashtun groups and many urban Afghans have been demanding since 2001. These reforms could be coupled with a renewed attempt to bring the Taliban into talks or even encourage them to take part in the loya jirga debate. The Taliban have made it clear that they also want changes to the constitution.
Finally after the passage of new electoral laws that would eliminate vote rigging, and the issuance of new ID cards, the interim government would oversee fresh parliamentary elections. The newly elected parliament would then choose a new prime minister to lead the country and a president as head of state, after which the interim government would resign.
Ambitious and difficult though such a path may be, many Afghans are convinced that ultimately Mr Ghani has no choice but to radically shake up the system. If he takes such a risk then who knows - he may remerge as the winner once again.

Pakistan has lost international support on Kashmir: ex Pak envoy

Pakistan no longer enjoys international support on Kashmir and is unlikely to get an approval for a referendum in the region from the UN Security Council, a former Pakistani envoy to the US has said.
"Kashmir is an emotive issue in Pakistan because of the failure of its leaders to inform their people that Pakistan no longer enjoys international support on the matter," said Husain Haqqani, former Pakistani Ambassador to the US.
Haqqani, who is currently director of South and Central Asia at the Hudson Institute, said for years Pakistan has sought international support for its position that Kashmir's future must be resolved through dialogue with India and a plebiscite among the Kashmiri people.
India does not even want to discuss the dispute without the end of Pakistan-sponsored terror, he added."What most Pakistanis do not know is that the last United Nations Security Council resolution on Kashmir was passed in 1957 and Pakistan could not win support for a referendum in Kashmir today if it asked for a new vote at the United Nations," Haqqani said in an op-ed published on the website of the Hudson Institute, a US-think tank.
"Instead of accepting that it might be better for India and Pakistan to normalise relations by expanding trade and cross-border travel, Pakistani hardliners have stuck to a 'Kashmir first' mantra, which they know is unrealistic," said Haqqani, who was at the loggerheads with the powerful Army when in office.
Posturing on Kashmir gets Pakistan nowhere but its leaders feel they need to do it any way to maintain support from Islamists and the military at home, he said.
According to Haqqani, hardliners in an increasingly self-confident India play on Indians' frustration with Pakistani state support for jihadis, such as those responsible for terrorist attacks in Mumbai in 2008.
"There is empty talk of 'teaching Pakistan a lesson' without acknowledging that teaching military lessons to nations armed with nuclear weapons is never easy. Indians could learn from the United States' frustrations with North Korea," he said.

Haqqani Network Leadership and Sanctuaries Still based in Pakistan

The Afghan government slammed Pakistani officials for their remarks regarding the elimination of Haqqani Terrorist Network following military operations in tribal regions of Pakistan.
The Presidential Palace issued a statement after Pakistan’s National Security Advisor Sartaj Aziz claimed that the terrorist network is no more operational in Pakistan and that they have shifted to Afghanistan.
The statement by the Presidential Palace stated “The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan believes that one of the major differences between Afghanistan and Pakistan is regarding the presence of terrorist groups, specifically the Haqqani Network in Pakistani soil.”
“The recent remarks by Pakistan’s National Security Advisor Sartaj Aziz, suggesting that the Haqqani Network has been decomposed following military operations, are repeated claims by Pakistani officials during the past one decade,” the statement said.
The Palace insisted that documents and evidences shows that the network’s leadership, commander and control, supportive infrastructure and sanctuaries are still operational in Pakistan.
The statement further added that the government of Afghanistan has repeatedly handed over evidences regarding the Haqqani Network operations in Pakistan and has urged the Pakistani government to take action.
“The International Community has also understands that the terrorist networks including the Haqqani Network are based in Pakistan,” the statement said, adding that “The recent step by United States is an approval of Afghan government’s stance after putting conditions on military aid to Pakistan which is subject to Islamabad’s practical steps against terrorist groups including Haqqani Network.”
The Palace warned that ignoring the issue by Pakistani will further weaken cooperation between the two nations to jointly fight terrorist and ensure peace and stability in the region.

U.S. Should Stop Reinforcing Pakistan's Delusions

By  


Susan Rice, the U.S. national security advisor, apparently traveled to Pakistan on Sunday August 30 to tell Pakistani officials that operations of militant jihadi groups like the Haqqani network from Pakistani soil were "absolutely unacceptable" to Americans. She is not the first official to convey that message to Pakistan. American and Pakistani officials have discussed the elimination of terrorist safe havens in Pakistan for at least the last two decades. Why, then, has the United States failed to secure Pakistan's acquiescence to its demands?
Ms. Rice's demand that Pakistan "do more" to curb terrorism from its soil will most likely have no more effect on Pakistan's all powerful military than earlier similar entreaties. The United States has been reluctant to exert leverage and pressure on Pakistan that might actually work, like international isolation, targeted sanctions or cutting off aid. The periodic suspension and conditionality of aid that the U.S. resorts to are too familiar to Pakistanis to make a difference.
In the end, it is all about how Pakistan's power centers view their national interest and the extent they fear (or, actually, do not fear) the Americans. The Pakistani military views the Haqqani network and allied groups as assets to help achieve its desire for a pro-Pakistan regime in Afghanistan. U.S. officials, in their desire to obtain Pakistan's support for American global aims, do not understand Pakistan's regional aspirations. Pakistan promises support to U.S. global aims, secures Washington's support and then goes on with pursuing its regional aims without regard for American concerns about its methods in the region.
The Pakistani assumption is that America protests but does not really care about its nuclear proliferation or support for terrorism as long as Pakistan's target is India or Afghanistan. The Taliban, the Haqqani network and the assorted anti-India jihadi groups nurtured by Islamabad did not attract American attention until 9/11. Since 2001, Pakistan has balanced its support for regional Jihadis with some cooperation with the U.S. in going after Al-Qaeda. Instead of seeing through and confronting Pakistan, Americans are all too willing to encourage Pakistan in persisting with its policies by praising the one step forward (in fighting some terrorist groups) without focusing on the many steps back.
Pakistan's regional preoccupation has been seeking military parity with its much larger neighbor, India. It doesn't matter that each one of the Pakistan's four wars with India were initiated by Pakistan. An existential threat from India is at the heart of Pakistani nationalism, the defining characteristic of a nation only 67 years old that lacks both history and an established national identity.
Pakistan has wooed the United States since its independence because Pakistani strategists and policy makers believed the U.S. was the ideal superpower ally who would build Pakistan's economic and material resources in order to help it stand up to India. From the 1950s until 1990s, Pakistan for the United States was one of many allies helping fight international communism.
American policy makers have consistently ignored, even when internal intelligence and staff memos said otherwise, the harsh reality of Pakistan never sharing American goals. When the Americans turned to Pakistan to fight international communism, Pakistan saw Hinduism as the threat. Now, despite being America's nominal allies in the fight against international terrorism, Pakistan still sees 'Hindu India' as the principal threat. Jihadi groups, such as the Haqqani Network, are Pakistan's instruments in its own war with India for influence over Afghanistan.
While the United States' focus has been global, Pakistan's focus has been regional: the desire for parity -- primarily military but also economic -- with India. Economic and military aid from the US has been one part of the strategy for achieving parity, the other has been using non-state actors or jihadi groups to keep both its neighbors - India and Afghanistan - tied down.
Fearful of one neighbor, India, Pakistan's early leaders hoped that their western neighbor, 'Muslim' Afghanistan would accept the Pakistani viewpoint and avoid ties with 'Hindu' India. However, Kabul and New Delhi have had close ties right from the 1950s with the exception of the years of Taliban rule.
To prevent a strategic encirclement by India and Afghanistan, Pakistan's military-intelligence establishment has supported Islamist groups in Afghanistan in the hope of a pro-Pakistan anti-Indian Afghan government. This has led Pakistan to support not just the Afghan Taliban but also the Haqqani network and allied groups.
Washington has known -and ignored -- Pakistan's security fears (and paranoia) about India and Afghanistan for decades. American policymakers and leaders have, however, always hoped that by giving more aid and arms to Pakistan they would reassure Pakistan's leaders that there was no threat to their territorial integrity and this would lead Pakistan to change its worldview.
Ironically, every American president in his first year (with the exception of Kennedy) tries to reach out to Pakistan and sees it as an American ally and in his last two years realizes the problem of divergent objectives.
In his book 'Magnificent Delusions -Pakistan, the United States and an Epic History of Misunderstanding,' Husain Haqqani (former Pakistani ambassador to the U.S.) tells the fascinating story of how President Dwight Eisenhower (along with Secretary of State John Foster Dulles) initially saw Pakistan as America's 'Most Allied Ally in Asia,' only to wonder in his second term whether military aid to Pakistan served any useful American purpose. President Lyndon Johnson asked the same question in 1965 and every American President, with the exception of Richard Nixon, has done so since then.
Despite the $12 billion in aid that the US provided to Pakistan after 9/11, former President George W. Bush wrote in his memoirs that then Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf "would not or could not fulfill his promises."
The Obama administration, too, has followed the familiar pattern of assuming that aid will buy America leverage with Pakistan. The Kerry Lugar Berman Bill, authorized by Congress in 2009, promised $1.5 billion in aid annually for 5 years, in the hope that this would encourage Pakistan to abandon support for Jihadi groups. The aid has flown uninterrupted even though Taliban operating from Pakistan attacked American troops in Afghanistan. US intelligence found the Pakistan-backed Haqqani network responsible for an attack on the American Embassy in Kabul and suspected Pakistani intelligence officers of directing the attack.
Ms. Rice's visit to Pakistan is unlikely to change Pakistani policy any more than the several visits to Islamabad by her predecessor General Jim Jones. Former Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen, met the Pakistan army chief 26 times in three years, hoping to initiate a change in Pakistani behavior. Towards the end of his tenure, Mullen voiced his frustration that the Haqqani Network operated as 'a veritable arm' of Pakistan's army. Apparently, frequent meetings with Pakistan's top general was not guarantee that the general would redirect the effort of his ground troops.
High-level visits by American officials to Pakistan do not help change Pakistan's strategic mindset. They only reinforce the belief of Pakistani leaders in the centrality of their country to global order. The belief that Pakistan is indispensable to the United States and is the pivot of the world for other major powers has encouraged Pakistan's irresponsible behavior.
Instead of feeding Pakistan's psychoses of self-importance and paranoia, the U.S. would do better by jolting its leaders into facing the realities of their domestic failures and the elusiveness of their dream of regional pre-eminence through terrorism.

Tough to be a Pakistani Christian: About 81% Christians are homeless, a survey reveals

A recent independent survey draws dire figures for Christians in Pakistan.
This survey was conducted by a Christian association led Basharat Yaqoob. The survey rounds total population of Christians in Pakistan at 10.5 million. The survey report states: “Total Christian population in Pakistan is 10.5 Million; out of these only 4% are educated or receiving education, about 68% of Christians are jobless.
About 81% of Christians are without homes, about 39% Christians are employed as labourers, 67% Christian families are living below the line, 29% Christian females are working as maids and 65% Christian men are sanitary workers. In line with these stats, Christians are living n poor condition majority without basic facilities in Pakistan.
Christians are far behind others due to lack of Education and basic facilities such as medical treatment, job opportunities, shelters, and access to legal provisions etc. The report finds fault in the Christian political leaders that, “They have never ventured to conduct surveys in order to provide basic facilities and to sort out solutions to Christian community as per living standard of other minorities.”
The report further points out to the reluctance of Church leaders to find solutions to empower the Christian community.They do not endeavour to find ways for betterment of Christians therefore; Christians do not find support which may thrust them towards betterment.
Christian mission schools and colleges were also criticized that they do not maintain standards and that they have high fees which are out of reach of the poor Christians. Moreover, majority of Christians as a result of being devoid of education earn bread by working as Sanitary Workers/Sweepers and such low-profile jobs.
- See more at: http://www.christiansinpakistan.com/tough-to-be-a-pakistani-christian-about-81-christians-are-homeless-a-survey-reveals/#sthash.zmRzdxfU.dpuf

Child abuse in Pakistan

Sarmad Ali


I urge the authorities and Punjab government to chalk out a roadmap to prevent such sexual abuse incidents from happening again.


In Pakistan, women and children are the most vulnerable beings. The recent child abuse scandal of Kasur is a landmark example of their vulnerability in Pakistan. The incident has been observed by human rights groups worldwide, which have expressed their concerns and sympathy to the affected children and women. Child abuse incidents in hierarchical and patriarchal societies, in the early 18th and 19th centuries, were widespread all over the world and especially in England. In ancient Greece, child marriages and adulterous relationships between a man and a boy were very common practices. It was then believed that the relationship of a man and a boy was a contribution from an adult man to a boy’s education, as per some historians. There was a segment of society in ancient Greece that could not entertain such practices and traditions and spoke out against them. However, advanced modern-day societies wholly banished such exploitation of children years ago. On the contrary, child exploitation still exists in third world countries, despite laws, especially in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Children across the globe have suffered abuse of all sort for years but abuse incidents had never been discussed on public forums until 1890, when a British newspaper, the Pall Mall Gazette, highlighted child abuse issues in England for the first time. Between 1830 and 1885, all documented sexual abuse and sexual violence in London involved children. Furthermore, until 1970, child pornography, paedophilic relationships and all such horrendous and immoral acts had not been recognised at all. The international community drafted laws and conventions pertaining to child pornography in the early 1990s, prohibiting all sorts of children-related pornography. On November 12, 1990, the UN promulgated the Child Rights Convention (CRC) relating to children’s rights. It also encapsulated the child pornography prohibition and, to date, 95 countries are party to that, including Pakistan. In spite of that, the situation in the third world is miserable and alarming.

A number of children face abuse every day and no one notices it because society does not understand what abuse is. CRC Article 34 reads that the government shall take steps to protect children from all sorts of sexual exploitation and abuse. Article 36 and Protocol 2 of the Convention explicitly talk about the sexual abuse of children, child prostitution, exploitation, etc. The Convention is a complete code, which was introduced by the UN to ensure rights to children across the globe. After the promulgation of the UN Convention, in order to fulfil its international obligations and to promote a sense of security in UK children, the government of the UK promulgated the Sexual Offences Act in 2003. This Act contains a number of Articles that cover child abuse, exploitation, pornography, etc, and lists the punishments for such crimes. Even India passed an Act in 2012, called the Protection of Children against Sexual Offences Act, 2012, related to child sexual abuse.

There are a number of provisions in the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and some Ordinances especially passed by parliament to protect children across Pakistan. All those laws have never been followed in letter or spirit by the law enforcing agencies, i.e. the police. Most of the time the police fail to understand and therefore do not incorporate provisions that are embodied in the PPC and Ordinances covering child abuse and sexual exploitation at the time of drafting a First Information Report (FIR). It is not out of place to mention that none of Pakistan’s provinces has any law against child pornography; this area of child abuse is unattended. There is an urgent need to enact laws that prohibit child pornography in order to curb such a heinous crime.

It is the writer’s opinion that child abuse, especially sexual abuse, affects the victims’ self-esteem, confidence and also their future prospects, i.e. family and marital affairs. I got the following information from SAHIL — a non-profit organisation that works across Pakistan for the rights of children. Every year, many cases of child abuse are registered with the police; for instance, 3,508 cases were filed with the authorities and 3,002 cases were reported in 2013 across Pakistan. According to SAHIL, “During the first six months of 2015, the police data shows that 577 sodomy and 45 hurt cases were reported in Punjab besides 35 murders and 20 attempted murder cases.” It has also been reported that 239 children were kidnapped and 10 children were abducted for ransom during the same period. It is the writer’s opinion that Pakistan is a conservative society, where most people do not muster the courage to report such cases to the police or speak out against abuse. Because of this fact, the cases of abuse get no attention from the media or human rights organisations. The affected families or victims themselves ought to report to the authorities about the abuse that they have suffered.

The latest child abuse case reported from Kasur tells that some 380 children, including girls, have been sexually abused since 2009 but none of the victims or their families reported the case to the police or media. The question is, why did they not report this to the police? It may be because of social fears or, if they had reported it, the authorities would not have paid enough attention, drawn up an FIR or initiated legal proceedings against those who sexually exploited vulnerable children and women. I believe that there is no policy or plan available to curb such miserable and alarming incidents. I urge the authorities and Punjab government to chalk out a roadmap to prevent such sexual abuse incidents from happening again. The Chief Minister (CM) of Punjab requested the Lahore High Court Chief Justice (CJ) to establish a commission to look into the matter. His plea has been rejected by the honourable CJ of the Lahore High Court on the basis that fact finding had been begun by the police and the arrest of those who had been involved in that case affected. The CM made a move by requesting the CJ but his Member Provincial Assembly of the Kasur village where the incident had taken place, attempted to cover up the abuse in connivance with the police. I end in the hope that the affected women and children will get justice and that the perpetrators will be punished for life.

Pakistan - Drone strike kills at least five suspected militants in North Waziristan



A drone attack on a militant compound in North Waziristan late Tuesday night killed at least five suspected militants, according to sources.
The drone strike took place in the Karwanda area of Datta Khel in the North Waziristan tribal district bordering Afghanistan, where the military is battling Taliban militants.
The drone fired two missiles targeting a house, killing at least five suspected terrorists, sources said.
The area is generally off-limits to journalists, making it difficult to independently verify the number and identity of the dead.
North Waziristan is among Pakistan’s seven tribal districts near the Afghan border which are rife with insurgents and have been strongholds of Taliban and Al Qaeda operatives, among others.
Pakistan Army in June last year launched an all-out operation named 'Zarb-i-Azb' against Taliban militants in the region, following which parts of the tribal agency was declared cleared of militants.
The army has intensified its offensive since the Taliban's massacre of 153 people, mostly children, in a school in Peshawar in December 2014.

Pakistan - Author of 1973 Constitution Abdul Hafeez Pirzada passes away

Prominent advocate and author of the 1973 Constitution, Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, passed away in London on Tuesday.
His younger brother, Abdul Mujeeb Pirzada, confirmed that Hafeez had been hospitalised in London for over a month.
The prominent lawyer, who had last represented Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in the judicial commission probing the May 2013 elections, had recently had a surgery on his intestine. That surgery resulted in medical complications leading to organ failure and ultimately his demise.
Hafeez, 80, is survived by two sons, two daughters and a wife.
Mujeeb said that it will take them two to three days to bring his body back from England, adding that he will be buried in his ancestral graveyard in Sukkur.
According to a senior PTI leader, Pirzada had travelled to the UK on July 8 where he underwent surgery to treat gastroenteritis. He was admitted to an intensive care unit at Berkshire Hospital in Reading, where his condition was described as stable.
Earlier, it was reported that Pirzada suffered a heart attack and his condition was critical. However, his family told The Express Tribunethat he did not suffer a heart attack and was stable.
Pirzada had been hired by the PTI in April 2015 to fight its case before the special judicial commission formed by the government to probe whether the May 2013 elections had been rigged.
The commission had completed its proceedings earlier this month and its verdict on whether the general elections were rigged or not, is awaited.
Pirzada is a barrister and a senior advocate of the Supreme Court. He is a third generation barrister from Lincoln’s Inn. He began practicing in the then West Pakistan High Court in 1957, joining the Chambers of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.
In 1959, Pirzada established law chambers in Karachi and was enrolled in the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 1962. Thereafter, in 1979 he signed the roll of senior Advocates of the Supreme Court.
From 1971 to 1977 Pirzada was a Member of Parliament and remained a senior Cabinet Minister in Bhutto’s government, holding several important portfolios including those of finance, law and parliamentary affairs, federal provincial coordination and education.
In 1972 he was elected as chairman of the Constitution committee of Parliament to frame a new Constitution for the country.
Subsequently, he was the author of the 1973 Constitution which was piloted by him as Minister for Parliamentary Affairs and passed by the Parliament unanimously.
He is considered a leading expert in the field of constitutional and administrative law and is also a member of the Pakistan Law Commission, a statutory body formed for the purposes of reviewing and overhauling the laws of Pakistan.
His company, Hafeez Pirzada Law Associates, is listed in the Asia Pacific Legal 500 and Chambers Global.

#Pakistan - #PPP- Wattoo demands full implementation of OGRA recommendations to benefit people

Mian Manzoor Ahmed Wattoo, President Punjab PPP, in a statement issued from here today, has judged the reduction in the prices of petroleum products by the government as grossly disproportionate to the recommendations of OGRA and to the prices oil in the international market.
The Regulatory Authority recommended Rs.12 reduction per liter in prices of petrol and diesel in view of the prices in the international market of the oil but regretfully the government transferred the benefit only around three to four rupees to the end consumers, he added.
He demanded that the recommendation of OGRA should be implemented fully for the benefit of the people.
He further said that the government had been quite miser in providing even due relief to the people whereas it was quite liberal in extending subsidies of hundreds of billions of rupees to the capitalists at the national exchequer’s expense through the notorious practice of issuance of SROs.
Mian Manzoor Ahmed Wattoo also strongly criticized the government for staggering increase on the tariff of gas both for domestic and industrial consumers that would affect the productivity and the competitiveness of the sector.
He said that the government had levied this tyrannical tariff to meet the conditionality of IMF in order to qualify to get the next tranche of loan adding this capitulation was at the expense of the poor people of the country.
The foreign loans serve the interests of the rulers, capitalists and bureaucrats by way of drawing luxurious perks and privileges and the poor people of the country had to bear the cruel brunt in the form of excessive indirect taxation on the goods and services of their use.
It seems that the government’s appetite to squeeze the poor dry had not satisfied yet as they were more inclined to add to their miseries than providing them relief.
He warned that the government should not test the patience of the people that was already tipping over the edges. Its spill over may erode the ground from underneath of the feet of the incumbent mandarins.


https://ppppunjab.wordpress.com/2015/09/01/mian-manzoor-ahmed-wattoo-demands-full-implementation-of-ogra-recommendations-to-benefit-people/

Pakistan suspects U.S. illegally cut down trees in its capital







By Tim Craig

In Pakistan’s capital, government leaders and residents often boast of living in one of the world’s “greenest” cities.
Islamabad, built in the 1960s and envisioned as a paradise for Pakistan’s governing elite, sits at the base of the lush Margalla Hills in the Himalayan foothills. Nearly every yard in this city of about a half-million people includes at least a few trees. Islamabad also maintains “green belts” of parkland that separate neighborhoods.
That success in maintaining Islamabad’s greenery can be attributed to the Capital Development Authority (CDA), a municipal authority tasked with protecting the city’s beauty. Before anyone cuts down a tree in Islamabad, homeowners must first get approval from the CDA, which often denies the requests.
But the CDA is now investigating whether the U.S. Embassy violated one of the cardinal rules for living in Islamabad: Don’t touch the trees.
On Sunday, citing unnamed sources, Pakistan's the News newspaper reported that police recently intercepted a truck that was “illegally” hauling tens of thousands of dollars' worth of trees from the embassy compound last Tuesday.
In an interview with The Washington Post, a spokesman for the CDA, Ramazan Sajid, confirmed that there is an active investigation of the matter.
According to Sajid, the U.S. Embassy recently requested permission to cut down 94 trees to make way for the next phase of an ongoing $1 billion expansion. That request was never granted, he said.
“Before a [no-objection certificate] was issued, a contractor hired by the embassy started cutting the trees,” Sajid said. “Those trees were loaded onto a truck and being carried away when the truck was stopped by police. The police took the truck and the contractor to the police station.”
In all, Sajid said, Islamabad police confiscated 13 trees from the truck. He said authorities are trying to determine how many trees have been cut down and whether the embassy deliberately violated the law.
“We have sent a letter to the embassy seeking more details,” Sajid said, adding that fines may be issued. “I can’t say whether anyone from the embassy was involved, but it’s a fact that trees were cut without [permission], which is illegal.”
A U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the matter, said the incident was limited to one truckload of trees. The official also stressed that U.S. Embassy personnel were not involved.
“We understand that a contractor associated with the construction of the New Embassy Compound in Islamabad attempted to remove one truckload of felled trees from the construction without the required No Objection Certificate, and the Capital Development Authority has since fined the contractor,” the official said in a statement. “The U.S. Embassy has not removed any trees from the construction site without a permit.”
Islamabad police also said they consider the case to be closed.
“Police intercepted the truck when it came out of the diplomatic enclave loaded with trees, and he [the driver] was brought to the police station,” said Muhammad Irshad, an assistant police inspector. The driver was later released after someone showed up at the station with a receipt indicating that he had paid a $300 fine to the CDA.
“The truck and driver were allowed to go after that,” Irshad said.
But the ongoing CDA investigation is likely to prompt fresh questions about why the embassy needs to cut down 94 trees to expand what is already a heavily fortified, 38-acre compound.
For years, the planned expansion of the U.S. Embassy has been controversial in Islamabad.
In 2009, critics of the expansion spread rumors that the United States was preparing to quietly station American troops or CIA agents on the property. More recently, an ongoing case in Pakistan’s Supreme Court is seeking to block the embassy from acquiring an additional 18 acres for its expansion. It is unclear whether those plans are related to the tree-cutting controversy.
“Only trees that fall within the footprint of new construction have been felled during the project, and a significant number of trees from the old embassy grounds have been relocated to the new compound,” said the U.S. official, adding that “extraordinary effort has been taken to preserve plants and trees where possible.”
Still, the controversy could prove to be a distraction as the U.S. government tries to prod Pakistan into doing more to protect its forests.
Islamabad’s greenery notwithstanding, Pakistan overall has retained just 2 percent to 5 percent of its tree canopy because of deforestation, according to estimates by private and public organizations. That rapid rate of tree loss has been blamed for Pakistan's struggle to combat lethal floods, disruptive landslides, poor water quality and air pollution.
The U.S. Agency for International Development, which operates locally from the U.S. Embassy, has partnered with several Pakistani organizations over the years to try to combat this problem.
Two years ago, USAID Pakistan even co-hosted a “tree planting” campaign in Pakistan on World Environment Day.
“Trees are the world’s single largest source of oxygen,” a manager of theUSAID-funded program was quoted as saying in a news release announcing the event. “They are under threat, which means we are under threat.”

Suicide Bomber in Pakistan Attacks Government Office, Killing 4

At least four people were killed and 50 others were wounded on Tuesday when a suicide bomber detonated his explosive-laden vest in the middle of a crowd lining up to enter a government building in northwestern Pakistan, officials said.
It was the first suicide bombing in the Khyber tribal region this year and took place in the Jamrud subdistrict, about 10 miles west of Peshawar, the capital of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Province.
The Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack, local news media reported.
“The bomber blew himself up amidst people lining up to get inside our local office,” Shahab Ali Shah, a senior Khyber government official, said by telephone.
“There was a threat alert,” he said. “Security was high, and since he could not get inside the building, he blew himself up outside.”
Four of the wounded were in serious condition, Mr. Shah said.
Later, during the search and rescue operation, security forces defused a bomb that was found close to the government building, he said.
“The overall security environment has improved after the military operation in the region,” Mr. Shah said. “Militants have been flushed out. The main threat and intelligence intercepts are now coming from militants hiding next door in Afghanistan.”
In mid-June, the Pakistani military concluded a campaign it called Operation Khyber-2 and said that it had regained control of plains areas in the Bara subdistrict and the remote Tirah Valley, which borders Afghanistan.
Pakistani and foreign militants have now taken shelter in areas close to the border in the eastern Afghan province of Nangarhar, according to security officials in Pakistan.

Sardar Ali Takkar - دَ جنت مرغئ کمترے ـ غنی خان - Pashto Music