Saturday, August 23, 2014

Thousands march in New York City to protest police chokehold death

http://www.reuters.com/
BY NATASJA SHERIFF
The Reverend Al Sharpton led thousands of chanting but peaceful activists in a march across Staten Island on Saturday to protest the death of Eric Garner, who died after New York City police put him in a banned chokehold last month.
Protesters traveled by bus and ferry to join the rally over Garner, a 43-year-old black father of six, whose killing has become part of a larger national debate about how U.S. police use force, particularly on people who are not white.
"We are not here to cause riots, we are here because violence was caused," Sharpton said to a crowd of cheering supporters who filled streets in the borough where Garner died.
Sharpton was joined by former New York Governor David Patterson, other civil rights leaders and Garner's widow, Esaw.
"Let's make this a peaceful march and get justice for my husband so that this doesn't happen to anybody else," Esaw Garner said in a somber tone to protesters.
Garner's sister, Ellisha Flagg, also spoke, saying the march was not anti-police, but was against police brutality and violence in general.
"We have to stop killing one another, hating one another," Flagg said.
The demonstration was also in response to the death of Michael Brown, an unarmed 18-year-old African American who was shot dead by a white police officer this month in Ferguson, Missouri, sparking more than a week of violent confrontations, Sharpton said.
Protesters carried signs demanding justice for Garner and Brown and shouted slogans including, "Hands up don't shoot." They began Saturday's march just after noon, walking past the district attorney's office, and ending a few blocks from the terminal for ferries to Manhattan.
Dawn Edwards, a human resource executive from Brooklyn, said she chose to march out of fear that negative stereotypes will have an impact on her two young sons as they grew older.
"I hope when my boys grow up to become men, those stereotypes will no longer exist," she said.
Michelle Johnson, a 34-year-old pharmacist from Long Island, said her sons had also inspired her to join the march. "It's a sobering lesson for a mother to tell her child that your country doesn't judge you simply on your character but on the color of your skin," Johnson said.
New York Police Department officers lined blocked streets near the march. Still, police said no arrests were made by the time the rally wound down in the late afternoon, and some officers handed bottles of water to protesters.
A New York City prosecutor plans to present evidence to a grand jury next month to determine whether anyone should be criminally charged in Garner's death.
The city's medical examiner ruled the death a homicide, saying police officers killed him by compressing his neck and chest as they restrained him for selling loose cigarettes. His health problems, including asthma and obesity, were contributing factors, the medical examiner said.

Obama Orders Review of Police Use of Military Equipment

NBC
President Barack Obama ordered a review of federal programs and funding that allow state and local law enforcement to acquire military equipment following concerns over the use of such gear during the recent unrest in Ferguson, Missouri. Obama has directed that the review consider whether dissemination of the military guns and armor to local law enforcement agencies is appropriate, according to a senior White House official. The review will also analyze whether local officials are properly trained to use the weapons and whether the federal government properly audits the use of the supplies, the official said.
Local law enforcement agencies around the U.S. are eligible to receive surplus military equipment through the Defense Department’s 1033 program. But there was outrage after photos and videos taken in Ferguson over the past week showed officers on tanks brandishing military-style firearms during protests over the fatal shooting of unarmed teenager Michael Brown by a police officer. The review will be led by White House staff, and relevant U.S. agencies — including the departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and Treasury — and will be carried out in coordination with Congress, the official said.

Naheed Akhtar - Teri Ulfat Main Sanam Dil Ne

Bilawal Bhutto expresses grief over Peshawar rain-related deaths

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, Patron-In-Chief, Pakistan People’s Party has expressed deep grief and sorrow over the loss of seven people following heavy downpour in Peshawar. In a press statement issued today, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said the innocent lives lost in natural vagary in Khyber-Pakhtoonkhwa should create sympathy in the hearts of Chief Minister KPK and provincial government and both should divert their attention towards the sufferings of the people of Peshawar in the monsoon instead of attending music concerts in Islamabad. He expressed sympathy with the families of victims and asked PPP’s Peshawar chapter to personally visit the affected families and provide solace to them.

Pakistan: Most of Peshawar areas without electricity

Death toll from rainstorm on Friday surged to 13 in the provincial capital with 40 people suffering injuries. The storm during which winds blew at the speed of 90 kilometres per hour also destroyed two power pylons and suspended electric supply from 213 of the total of 250 local feeders.
Several localities had been without electricity for 24 hours.
The rainstorm lashed the city for the second time in the week.
On August 15, the storm had killed 18 people and injured 82.
An official said power supply from 500kv Sheikh Mohammadi grid station had been suspended after the rainstorm damaged two pylons of the National Transmission and Despatch Company.
He said power supply from 220kv Daudkhel transmission line had been suspended when two power pylons of 500kv transmission line supplying electricity from Tarbela power generation house to Sheikh Mohammadi grid station fell on 220kv line.
Another official said repairs on power transmission lines would take time as it was not possible to shift heavy cranes from Islamabad to Peshawar due to blockade of roads.
He said the cranes would be brought in from Rawat and Sheikhupura.
The official said repairs could take more than one week due to logistic problems.
He said strong winds uprooted big trees, huge billboards and poles in urban and rural areas of the city making it difficult for workers of the power supply company to restore electricity.
Rainstorm death toll reaches 13
The Met Office said speed of the windstorm was 90 kilometers per hour and the city had received 16 millimeters rain.
Deputy commissioner of Peshawar Zaheerul Islam said the disaster had killed 13 people including women and children and wounded 54 others which also caused damages to residential houses and infrastructure.
He said the rain-affected families would get cash relief as per government compensation policy.
Three members of a family died when house collapsed in Karkhano area. Wounded persons were brought to Lady Reading Hospital and Hayatabad Medical Complex.
An official of Peshawar Electric Supply Company said on Friday windstorm had caused significant damages to the system and extent of the losses had not been assessed so far.
He said repairs was still in progress in various areas and electricity shortfall had increased due to suspension of power supply from Sheikh Mohammadi grid station.
The official said the calamity had disrupted electricity supply in urban and rural areas including Hayatabad Township, Industrial Estate, University Town, Regi and Achini and many localities were still without power.
Meanwhile, power suspension has caused shortage of drinking water in the city.
Waseem of Hayatabad said there was acute shortage of drinking water in his area and that the people had to spend nights in the open due to humid weather.
He said rainstorm had uprooted many trees and electricity poles in the town and surrounding areas. Workers of the civic the bodies were seen removing uprooted trees, broken branches and signboards from the streets and roads.
RAIN CLAIMS TWO LIVES: Two women were killed and five children were injured when the roof of a house caved in and boundary wall of another fell down in Akkakhel area of Bara tehsil.
Local residents said wife of Noor Mohammad was killed and two of their children were injured when the roof of their house collapsed due to torrential rains in Sultankhel locality.
In another incident, wife of Haji Rahim Jan was killed and three children of Haji Mughal Jan were critically injured when the boundary wall of their house fell on them as they were playing there.
Electric supply to entire Landi Kotal tehsil was cut off when strong winds uprooted three power pylons in Sur Kamar area.
The power suspension also caused acute water shortage in Landi Kotal and surrounding areas.

Video Report: Pakistan asks for DGMO meet with India to address border firing

Pakistan: IDPs protest PTI, PAT indifference to their plight in Bannu

http://tribune.com.pk/
Internally displaced persons of North Waziristan staged a protest in Bannu on Friday against Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Imran Khan and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) chief Dr Tahirul Qadri for hijacking media attention towards their protests in Islamabad.
IDPs in Bannu took out a protest rally from Milad Park, Bannu City and marched through various districts to the Bannu Press Club. The protesters held placards which were inscribed with slogans against K-P government, Imran Khan and Dr Tahirul Qadri.
Led by North Wazirstan Affected People Committee president Nisar Ali Khan, the protesters said that PTI and PAT had occupied Islamabad and started a sit-in for an indefinite time and that the move was hiding problems of the IDPs from the world. They termed sit-ins by both leaders as a drama.
The protesters demanded that the PTI chairman should remove ‘Khan’ from his name because he was not representing their interests. They argued that if he was a leader representing them, he would have been there with the IDPs rather than dancing and singing with a mob in Islamabad.
The speakers further claimed that relief items that were dispatched for the IDPs were being sold in the market openly.
Further, the IDPs claimed that they were being evicted from government schools without providing an alternate residence, and that they were being provided substandard food items. They claimed they were being fleeced for their domiciles and identity cards.

Pakistan: Zardari urges dialogue, vows to uphold democracy

After meeting with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) Emir Sirajul Haq and PML-Q leaders, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari on Saturday evening said that his party will not let democracy be derailed.
Speaking at a press conference here, he reiterated that the PPP will extend every possible effort to uphold democracy in the country.
Regarding his meeting with the prime minister, Zardari said he urged Prime Minister Sharif to resolve the current political crisis through dialogue. “I told PM Nawaz Sharif...dialogue, dialogue and dialogue... democracy means never shutting the door,” said the former president.
“Democracy should not be derailed, " he said. "Once our democratic system is strong enough then we can afford street demonstrations. Otherwise they will derail the system.”
He expressed optimism that a peaceful solution would be achieved with current efforts of dialogue between the two sides. He said the country at this critical juncture needed unity among political forces.
Asif Zardari said it was the Parliament’s prerogative to complete its constitutional term. “We are the opposition and will remain the same…however, we do not want indulge in an unconstitutional and undemocratic attitude.”
Answering a question regarding resignations submitted by the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) lawmakers, he said: “I won’t call it immaturity, they are politicians and we have welcomed them in the Parliament and all political parties should stand united for the greater national interest.”
“I voluntarily devolved power to the Parliament in order to strengthen the country's democratic structure,” said the former president referring to amendment of Article 58 (2b) of the Constitution during his party’s rule.
“There is no third umpire …. and things should not be referred to the third umpire...we should resolve the issues...otherwise it will become a long tale,” said the PPP leader.
Meanwhile, PML-Q leader Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi said that PAT’s protest demonstration was getting stronger with every passing day.
Speaking to the media after meeting with PPP Co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari, he said that he has apprised him about Dr Tahirul Qadri’s reservations against PM Nawaz Sharif and his party.
He said that a consensus was reached at the meeting for lawful and constitutional steps to diffuse prevailing political tension.

Pakistan: Kaira urges govt, PTI to show flexibility

PPP leader and former information minister Qamar Zaman Kaira today urged Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) to withdraw its resignations, saying that it was premature to demand Prime Minister’s resignation.
Speaking to media persons, Kaira said that Imran Khan should not put the whole system in test. “There is a need to resolve this impasse within the ambit of constitution,” he opined.
He also called upon the government to show some flexibility to end the deadlock.
“PPP believes in democracy. We have rendered huge sacrifices for the sake of democracy,” he added.
It is noted here that Imran Khan has recommended the name of Kaira as a mediator for talks with the government.

Zardari meets Siraj, agree to resolve issues through negotiations

Former President Asif Zardari has appreciated the efforts of Jamat-e-Islami Ameer Siraj ul Haq and said him to continue efforts as mediator to defuse tension. JI Ameer Siraj-ul-Haq has said that negotiation is the only way to resolve political issues.
Former President Asif Ali Zardari reached Jamat-e-Islami head quarter Mansoora to hold meeting with JI chief Sirajul Haq minutes after meeting with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.
Asif Zardari reached Mansoora along with his delegation who was welcomed by JI chief Sirajul Haq. Both the leaders discussed the ongoing political situation and ways to defuse the tension.
While talking to media after meeting with Asif Zardari Ameer Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) Sirajul Haq said that all the political parties of the country are on the same page to resolve the current political tense situation through meaningful negotiations. He said that both the parties agreed to continue efforts to resolve the ‘Azadi March’ and ‘Revolution March’ issues through negotiations. He said that Zardari has asked him to continue efforts as mediator to defuse tension.
Siraj said that Zardari has formed a four member PPP committee comprise of Rehman Malik, Raza Rabbani, Aitzaz Ahsan and Khurshid Shah will remain in contact with JI.
He asked PTI to rethink over decision of resignation from National Assembly adding that the NA speaker should delay the acceptance of PTI MNA’s resignations. He announced four member committee of JI to meet NA speaker and ask him to delay the acceptance of PTI MNA’s resignations till the issue was resolved through negotiations.
The meeting was well attended by Khurshid Shah, Aitzaz Ahsan, Raza Rabbani and Rehman Malik.

Pakistan: Battered Nawaz government receives street support from extremist clerics

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) received a vote of confidence from some unlikely allies, as the proscribed Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat (ASWJ) – formerly known as the Sipah-i-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP) – rallied in support of the ruling party after Friday prayers.
The demonstrators, led by ASWJ chief Ahmed Ludhianvi, marched from the Lal Masjid to the National Press Club, in opposition to what they called “attempts to replicate an Iran-style revolution in Pakistan”.
However, the rally was punctuated by sectarian slogans. ASWJ and the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Sami (JUI-S) members who spoke at the rally also used derogatory language towards Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chief Imran Khan, Pakistan Awami Tehreek leader Tahirul Qadri and Raja Nasir Abbas of the Majlis-i-Wahdatul Muslimeen (MWM).
Participants of the rally, titled the ‘Defence of Islam and Stability of Pakistan’ also denounced J. Salik, Sheikh Rashid Ahmed and the Chaudhrys of Gujrat for siding with Mr Khan and Dr Qadri. ASWJ rallies in support of democracy, alleges Qadri wants to impose Iran-style revolution on Pakistan
Consisting mostly of students and teachers from local Deobandi ASWJ-affiliated madressahs and Lal Masjid, rally participants even carried placards bearing incendiary slogans, including one that said: “Those opposing the PML-N government would do so over our dead bodies”.
The primary thrust of all the speakers was the claim that Allama Tahirul Qadri was trying to force a revolution on the country, along the lines of the Ayatollah Khomeni-led Iranian revolution of 1979.
Ludhianvi said that Dr Qadri was “conspiring against Sunnis in Pakistan by importing the Iranian Revolution”.
“Ahle Sunnat is the majority (sect) in Pakistan and we want our brand of Sharia in the country,” he said, stopping short of hurling direct threats against both the PAT and PTI.
Challenging both party leaders, he said his party could call so many people to the capital that there will be “no space left”, adding that the protesters on Constitution Avenue would “all run away after seeing the numbers of our supporters”.Mr Ludhianvi also had a word of advice for both PAT and PTI.
“I regret the 14 deaths in Model Town, but more than 7,000 of our workers have been assassinated, yet we have never taken to the streets in protest. Imran Khan is upset about electoral rigging; I too am a victim of rigging but I’ve taken a legal recourse,” the ASWJ chief said, adding, “My advice to both of you: learn from our example and don’t act like extremists”.
JUI-S Islamabad chapter head Sheikhul Hadis Abdul Rauf called the PTI and PAT marches “a conspiracy against Islam and Pakistan” and called upon all Sunnis to rise up in defence of their religion and country.
PML-N youth wing leaders and members of the party’s Islamabad chapter, who were also present on stage at the time, lauded the ASWJ for coming out in support of Islam, Pakistan and democracy.
As the participants raised sectarian slogans, PML-N Youth Wing’s Yasir Abbasi said that neither Imran Khan nor Dr Qadri had ever stood up against threats to Islam or the country.
“Maulana Ludhianvi is the real defender of Islam. He is our leader – we look to you whenever Islam faces hard times,” Mr Abbasi said.
Senior ASWJ leader Masoodur Rehman Usmani even went as far as to suggest that the term ‘Mustafavi Revolution’ – being used by Tahirul Qadri and his supporters – had nothing to do with the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him).“This refers to the name of one of Ayatullah Khomeni’s daughter, who was called Mustafavi. She would indoctrinate Tahirul Qadri with ideas from the Iranian revolution,” Usmani told the crowd, branding Dr Qadri “an infidel” and denouncing Imran Khan for “spreading obscenity and shamelessness among the women of Islamabad”.
However, political analysts have a grave view of the ASWJ’s decision to join the fray in defence of ‘democracy’.
“It seems the PML-N has unleashed its ally among extremist groups, but it is dangerous to give them space,” senior journalist and commentator Zahid Hussain told Dawn, adding, “The government needs to resolve the issue through political means, not by bringing proscribed groups to its aid”.

Pakistan: Afghan immigrants are biggest threat for peace of Balochistan

Afghan immigrants are the biggest threat for the peace of Balochistan, said Minister for Home and Tribal Affairs of Balochistan, Sarfraz Bugti in a press conference yesterday.
Addressing a Press conference in Frontier Corps Madadgar Center, Sarfraz Bugti said that Afghan immigrants should be sent back to their country soon. He further added that data of Afghan immigrants living in vicinity of Samungli airbase is being collected by government.
In past, Afghan immigrants have been involved in major terrorist attacks in Balochistan. A suicide car bomb attack on the residence of DIG frontier Corps was carried out by an Afghan Immigrant in September 2011.

Obsessed With India, Pakistan Risks Anarchy

By Husain Haqqani
The elaborate diplomatic dance between India and Pakistan has been interrupted once again. The two sides remain far from a major breakthrough in their troubled relationship. As long as the Pakistani Army continues to view India as an existential threat and maintains its grip over security policy, the twain may never achieve permanent peace.
India has called off the meeting between its Foreign Secretary Sujata Singh and her Pakistani counterpart Aizaz Chaudhry scheduled for August 25 in Islamabad, after Pakistan's High Commissioner in Delhi met Kashmiri separatist leaders. This has ended the euphoria following Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's journey to New Delhi for the inauguration of Prime Minister Narendra Modi last May. Pakistan's decision to remind Indians of their dispute over Kashmir followed Modi's comments about Pakistani support for terrorism during a recent visit to Kargil, where the two countries fought a war in 1999.
Both Sharif and Modi spoke of the need to bury the hatchet during their meeting on the occasion of Modi's inauguration. But the expressions of desire for normalization could not contain the more substantive problems in the India-Pakistan relationship. India remains unhappy over Pakistan's failure to prosecute terrorists involved in the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Sharif, on the other hand, must deal with hardliners in Pakistan's military who insist on seeing India as their country's permanent enemy -- unwilling to look too closely at the terrorists involved in the attack.
For India, the 26/11 Mumbai attacks were as much a challenge as the 9/11 assault was for Americans. The 12 coordinated shootings and bombings carried out by ten Pakistani terrorists killed 164 people and terrorized India's commercial capital for almost three days before commandos flushed them out of various buildings, including five-star hotels and a Jewish community center. The images of the attacks, telecast live into Indian homes, are seared in the memory of most Indians.
Although Pakistan arrested several individuals involved in planning and executing the Mumbai attacks, prosecution has been repeatedly delayed. Intelligence reports, including some from U.S. sources, have indicated that the detained commanders of Lashkar-e-Taiba, or LeT, enjoy amenities not available to prisoners. Some have been found passing instructions on the phone to operatives. Recently, their trial was once again postponed without recording evidence or other substantive proceedings.
LeT chief Hafiz Muhammad Sayeed remains free, appearing on television spouting venom against India, Israel and the United States from his massive headquarters near Lahore. Indian officials read Pakistan's refusal to prosecute the 26/11 accused or clamp down on Hafiz Sayeed as a sign of reluctance in shutting down anti-India jihadi groups.
In July, Pakistan's military launched a military operation against terrorist safe havens along its border with Afghanistan, yet the Pakistani state is far from shutting down the jihadi infrastructure built since the 1980s war against the Soviets in Afghanistan and the subsequent militant uprising in Kashmir during the 1990s.
The Pakistani military continues to seek military advantage against India even though the possession of nuclear weapons by both countries should deter the prospect of war. Jihadis offer a sub-conventional deterrent to Pakistan against India's overwhelming advantage in conventional military capability. Most Pakistani civilian politicians recognize the dangers of reliance on terrorism as an element of Pakistan's strategic planning, but the military retains tight control over foreign and national security policy despite return to civilian rule in 2008.
Like his civilian predecessor Asif Ali Zardari, Sharif has declared normalization of relations with India as a priority. Zardari's government tried to open travel and trade and, in 2011, agreed to Most Favored Nation status for India. Despite completion of legal formalities, the status has not yet been granted, demonstrating behind-the-scenes military influence.
After his election last year, Sharif renewed talk of normalizing relations with India, with special emphasis on trade. India and Pakistan have a combined population of 1.4 billion, share a 2,000-mile border and a common history until 1947. Their languages are mutually understandable, and parts of their populations have overlapping ethnicity. There is also significant complementarity in the two neighbors' economies. Still, trade between them amounted to only $2.6 billion last year, less than 0.5 percent of India's total commerce. As a businessman, Sharif says he understands the benefit of freer trade between the two countries.
Rhetoric and expressions of desire for more trade notwithstanding, security remains the overarching consideration in India-Pakistan ties.
Sharif's participation in Modi's inauguration was billed as the first time a Pakistani prime minister had attended such celebrations in India -- an opportunity for laying foundations of a new relationship between India and Pakistan. The prospect of a new beginning, however, was soon undermined by incidents of firing along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. The two countries have fought for the control of Kashmir since 1947.
According to Indian officials, Pakistan has violated the ceasefire in the disputed territory 54 times this year through July 16 and 19 times since the Modi government took office May 26. Defense Minister Arun Jaitley told parliament recently that Pakistan violated the ceasefire agreement 199 times last year. Pakistan flatly denies reports of these incidents, just as it denies support for jihadi groups operating in Kashmir -- though they operate in full view of Pakistani and international media.
There are many logical reasons for why and how India-Pakistan ties can be normalized. Psychological, not logical, factors have held the relationship back so far. Since the country's birth through India's partition in 1947, Pakistanis have sought to define their national identity through denial of commonality with India.
Disputes, such as the one over Jammu and Kashmir, have over the years become more symptom than cause of tensions in the subcontinent. At the heart of the problem is Pakistan's carefully nurtured national narrative and state ideology, diametrically opposed to India's view of itself as the region's preeminent power.
"Two nations share a 2,000-mile border and common history. Pakistanis seek national identity by denying ties with India."
Since independence, Pakistanis have been told, and with greater vehemence since 1977 with the rule of military dictator Muhammad Zia ul-Haq, that their country is a "citadel of Islam," that its destiny is to be an Islamic state and its army is "the sword of Islam." Advocates of modern, secular values, even pluralism, are denigrated as "enemies of the ideology of Pakistan," therefore cast as "traitors to Pakistan." Pakistan's establishment, led by its military, also seeks parity with India, not only in the legal sense of sovereign equality between nations but in military and political terms.
This ideological milieu has helped religious-political groups exercise greater influence on national discourse than is justified by either the size of their membership or number of votes in Pakistan's sporadic general elections and led to the outgrowth of jihadi groups, one more extreme than the other.
Pakistan's state ideology has undermined prospects for peace with India since 1950, when Pakistani Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan travelled to Delhi and signed the first major agreement. The optimism about the agreement died within a year with the assassination of its Pakistani signatory. Pakistan has since gone through years of political instability while the army has gained influence in policymaking.
Over the years, Pakistan participated in U.S.-led anti-communist military alliances to secure military hardware that would enable it to deal with a larger, ostensibly hostile neighbor. It has fought four wars with India, including the one in 1971 resulting in the creation of Bangladesh, leaving Pakistan with half its 1947 territory. Although Pakistan has acquired nuclear weapons capability, its insecurity in relation to India has not diminished.
Soon after independence, Pakistan's founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah had said that he expected India and Pakistan to live alongside each other like Canada and the United States. But as long as Pakistan's establishment continues to paint India as an existential threat and a permanent enemy in the minds of its people, no Pakistani leader -- civilian or military -- can embrace the Canada-U.S. model. For now, the two sides will maintain their well-worn pattern of diplomatic engagement interspersed with periods of intense hostility.

Pakistan: For the sake of democracy

How ironic it is that 68 years on as an independent people we still nurture and relish a whole host of paradoxes instead of accepting soft and hard realities that come our way in our national life. Take, for instance, the anti-government sit-ins in front of the Parliament House; the fact is that by the end of the week these have morphed into a sort of carnivals contributing - in a significant manner - to the ongoing turmoil. Courtesy this prank whatever recovery of our national economy was in evidence it has been seriously undermined; people's faith in the democratic system has eroded and our image abroad has taken a serious battering. We have received warning from our friends in the West not to rock the boat and we have requested the Sri Lanka president to put off his visit. We vow to defend democracy whatever it takes, but just one ISPR statement has made us launch a series of 'muzaakraat' to explore ways and means for political co-existence. We have broken the back of terrorists in North Waziristan but we are not yet on the ground hospitable enough that the IDPs should return to their homes. If air strikes were to be our weapons of choice against terrorists' hideouts what is wrong then with the drones that cause much less collateral damage? Is the continuing turmoil in the Capital a perfect diversion from what is happening on the warfront? Nobody is talking about the tens of thousands of men, women and children, who are out in the open under the high noon sun as a token of their contribution to our national independence. Maybe, what the people are fed by the media as daily staple is projection of cultist populism and clash of big egos. We seem to be irretrievably addicted to saying one thing and doing just the opposite.
This is a sorry state of affairs that the men in uniform have to act as monitors as if their political counterparts are unable to walk on their own two feet. We need to walk out of this make-believe world and come to grips with realities of life as they come. Those who are rocking the boat too hard need to revisit our political history. It was the unending political squabble resulting in a game of musical chairs that opened the door wide enough for General Ayub Khan to walk in. By the time he left the stage, all that squabbling lot was nowhere in existence. Yet another generation of squabbling politicians 'invited' General Ziaul Haq. For 11 years there was no democracy. Unless we shun paradoxical attitude of paying only lip service to democratic norms and practices, we keep alive a potent threat to the democratic system. Of course, there is a strong humanitarian aspect to Dr Tahirul Qadri's agenda; but there is no reason it should be executed by force resulting in derailment of the democratic system. His only option is walking the democratic path to reach the parliament and heading a majority big enough to amend the Constitution. By staging a sit-in in front of the parliament building he has no chance of implementing his agenda. Imran Khan is part of the parliament and a part of his agenda deserves to be implemented. But seeking its implementation under threat of force is not what the Constitution permits and the parliament should countenance. Under the Constitution, the prime ministerial slot gets vacated only, if he/she resigns or is voted out by the majority of the members or dies, which is not the case in the present scenario. The remaining five demands, however deserve attention and therefore should be addressed and discussed to determine their applicability under the Constitution. As regards the government it must take appropriate measures that should not only improve the climate for a meaningful dialogue but also walk some reasonable distance from its tightly-held 'heavy-mandate' fortress. Rejecting the idea of majority rule, Thomas Jefferson, a founding father of one of the world's oldest democracy with a written constitution, the United States of America, said: 'Though the will of majority in all cases must prevail, that will, to be rightful, must be reasonable; that minority possesses equal rights, which equal laws must protect, and to violate which would be oppression'. The truth is that a hubris-ridden PML (N) government exhibited scandalous nonchalance over Imran Khan's call for vote verification posing as if it was not its but others' concern. But now, that it appears willing to review its position, we expect Imran Khan to return to the parliament and ask for this - instead of remaining defiant and unbending in his unenviable position of denial. The guru of pragmatic politics Winston Churchill once said 'a good politician should be able to tell you what would happen tomorrow, and if it doesn't happen he should be able to tell you why it didn't happen'.

Zardari holds consultations ahead of Nawaz meeting

Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari has tasked opposition leader in the National Assembly Syed Khursheed Shah with helping defuse the political deadlock. This was decided in a meeting of the PPP central executive committee which took place with Zardari in the chair. The meeting also decided to engage former Punjab governor Makhdoom Ahmed Mehmood in the dialogue process to get the prevailing political stalemate settled. The PPP leaders agreed that they would back the government in both the houses of parliament and not support any undemocratic move against the government. The PPP co-chairman also summoned a meeting of the party’s Punjab chapter.
Separately, Zardari and Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Fazlur Rehman talked to each other on telephone on Friday. According to media reports, the former president talked to the JUI-F chief on telephone after reaching Karachi on Friday. The two leaders discussed the ongoing marches in Islamabad and discussed different problems facing the country. Moreover, Zardari will contact all political parties on the current situation, and JUI-F chief has agreed to it. Zardari also telephoned founder leader of Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) Altaf Hussain on Friday. The two men inquired after the well being of each other and expressed good wishes. They discussed the current political crisis and the overall situation in the country besides other issues of mutual interest.
Zardari and PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Thursday met with senior party colleagues to discuss the current political situation in Pakistan. After a wide-ranging discussion on the subject, Zardari reiterated that the current political crisis be addressed through dialogue and within the framework of the constitution. The party members expressed concern at the “short-sighted and high-handed tactics of the government” and urged all parties in the conflict to resolve the issues at hand without recourse to further violence and disruption of public life in the capital and country. The meeting condemned the killing of PAT workers in Model Town, Lahore, on June 17 and demanded that an FIR be expeditiously registered. The party observed that any unconstitutional path taken to resolve the current stalemate will be detrimental to the future of democracy and the stability of the state. Zardari noted with concern that instead of focusing on providing relief to a million citizens of North Waziristan both the provincial and federal governments had entangled themselves and the country in a protracted dispute.

Pakistan: Pot calling the kettle black?

The Express Tribune
By Taj Haider
The present crisis of the right-wing extremist politics of Pakistan is the direct result of manipulations in the last general elections. Those shouting themselves hoarse over rigging in the previous elections were themselves the biggest beneficiaries of such rigging. They choose to ignore the fact that the three political parties, which were against extremism, were not allowed to run an election campaign. The son of former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gilani was kidnapped at gunpoint for holding a small election-corner meeting in Multan (he has not been recovered to date) while the PML-N and the PTI were campaigning across the length and breadth of the country unhindered and unharmed.
The difference made by militancy in the results of the elections can be gauged from the results of NA-1 in Peshawar where PTI chief Imran Khan won by a lead of 70,000 votes and had vacated the seat later. In the by-elections held just two months later, when the militants allowed the ANP to campaign, not only did the PTI lead of 70,000 votes vanish, but the PTI lost the seat itself.
The agitators also chose to ignore the findings of the election tribunal on the rigging committed by the PTI on PS-93, Karachi West. The tribunal, in its judgment of August 7, found that the sitting MPA, who is the PTI’s Sindh general secretary, had changed the results of seven polling stations, had increased votes in his favour by more than 5,000 and reduced the votes of the JI candidate who was declared the ultimate winner by the tribunal. The same official took hundreds of PTI workers to Islamabad dharnas and stood next to his chief demanding “resignations and fair elections”.
These weren’t elections. This was an arrangement worked out by the agencies (whom PPP President Makhdoom Amin Fahim rightly congratulated on the PML-N’s election victory) and supported on the ground by militants. This was an artificial arrangement, whose time was long past. This arrangement had to crumble down. The time for worn out ideas and their imposition at gunpoint is long gone.
The Pakistan Peoples Party had opted for the continuation of the spirit of the Charter of Democracy. The spirit is that of reconciliation. It excludes dictation of the establishment. We had made the PML-N a part of the federal government. We, ourselves, were part of the Punjab government. Unfortunately, Nawaz Sharif thought it better to part ways and started using state institutions to destabilise our elected government. While we were acting boldly to oust militants from Swat and other areas, these elements were provided safe havens in southern Punjab.
In the interests of democracy, the PPP decided not to protest on the streets. The highly abusive language used against us and our leadership by the PML-N hurt us. But at the present crucial juncture, the language being used against the PML-N leadership is hurting us more. The continuation of the democratic system remains, as always, our top priority. Democracy presupposes a civilised political culture, which is being ruined by these elements who have no stakes in the democratic system.
Can the commission appointed by the Honourable Supreme Court investigate all of more than 1,300 seats of the provincial assemblies and the National Assembly? The record has been so badly messed up as a result of arrangements made before the polls that it has become impossible to correctly identify the bogus votes. The fact that the three parties, which were against extremist militants, were not allowed to campaign while the PTI and the PML-N enjoyed their full support, is reason enough to call the election unfair. The PPP has been saying that from day one.
The most important question is: where do we go from here? The PPP, the biggest sufferer of rigging, believes in politics of reconciliation. Major successes for democracy — the Charter of Democracy, the NFC Award, the Eighteenth Amendment, the completion of the term of previous assemblies and the governments were all results of the politics of reconciliation. ‘Politics of confrontation’, which makes the headlines, has always resulted in setbacks, the loss of democratic gains and ultimately, dictatorship. We have seen enough of it in 1999. We do not understand why the PTI and the PML-N, which were the biggest beneficiaries of poll rigging, are pushing the country to the same abyss through confrontation. Everyone stands to lose. There are no winners in this confrontation or in any confrontation for that matter.
Emotionalism has to make way for rationalism. Violence and democracy can never coexist. We shall have to jointly find way to exclude militancy and the role of agencies from the electoral system. The time for such a system has arrived. Attempts to postpone it will always result in one crisis after the other.

Pakistan: All eyes on ‘Zardari formula’

As Pakistan People’s Party supremo Asif Ali Zardari is coming to Lahore on Saturday (today) to give Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif “a valuable piece of advice,” some PPP leaders are of the view that the premier should go for a “big sacrifice” in case he finds no way to avert the crisis.
The PPP leaders also say any more delay in resolving the issue with the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf and the Pakistan Awami Tehreek will harm the government. Mr Zardari will tell the prime minister to show ‘large-heartedness’ to resolve the crisis.
“Even if the prime minister has to opt for some sacrifice, he should go for it to save the democratic system,” PPP Secretary-General Sardar Latif Khosa told Dawn here on Friday. “We had accepted the sacking of Yousuf Raza Gilani as prime minister just for continuation of democracy in the country. We avoided confrontation. It was the policy of reconciliation of Mr Zardari that averted major crises during the last PPP regime in which the PML-N played a very hostile role. Had the PPP in the position the PML-N finds itself in today, the latter would have gone against us,” he said.
Mr Khosa said the government would have to show more flexibility than the PTI and PAT to resolve the crisis. “The government will be at the losing end if the crisis persists,” he warned. At the same time he asked the PTI and PAT leadership to come on the negotiation table.
He asked the PML-N government to ‘own’ Opposition Leader Khurshid Shah’s proposal of holding investigation of rigging allegations before the demand of resignation. “This formula should be acceptable to both the government and the protesting parties,” he said.
Had the government earlier paid heed to Mr Zardari’s advice to audit four constituencies for verification of votes today, it would have averted the crisis. “It will be better for the PML-N leadership to now follow Mr Zardari’s advice (in Saturday’s meeting) to deal with the issue,” Khosa advised the PML-N leadership.
Zardari’s coordinator in Punjab Naveed Chaudhry said it was the test of the PML-N leadership to show maturity and take some decision in case it found itself stuck in a blind alley. “Mr Sharif will have to follow the advice of Mr Zaradri as we should be more concerned about saving the political system in the country,” he said while remarking that resignation was not a big thing.
“What the government should do is overcome political polarisation and avoid reaching the point where the country comes in the grip of anarchy,” he said.
Naveed Chaudhry said the PML-N should follow the PPP’s policy of reconciliation.

Friday, August 22, 2014

Phil Collins - Another Day In Paradise

A Yes means more jobs for young people in Scotland

Obama action on immigration could affect midterms

http://www.azcentral.com/
President Barack Obama is getting ready to act alone on immigration reform, just weeks before this year's congressional midterm elections.
Immigrant advocates are pushing President Barack Obama to "go big and go bold" when he wields his executive authority in the coming weeks to shield potentially millions of undocumented immigrants from deportation.
But no matter what independent action Obama takes on immigration, big or small, it could scramble U.S. politics just weeks before the Nov. 4 congressional midterm elections and reverberate into the 2016 presidential election.
Obama's unilateral move to provide deportation relief risks hurting the re-election campaigns of some fellow Democrats in the Senate and House by angering Republicans voters and spurring them to the polls.
A political backlash could help Republicans retake the Senate in the coming November elections if Obama's ­action drives more angry Republican voters to the polls than Democrats who would want to reward him.
Obama also risks alienating Republican allies of immigration ­reform, such as Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, who was the lead GOP negotiator on last year's bipartisan reform bill — which passed the Senate in 2013 — and is warning ­Obama not to overreach on his own.
Still, Obama's presidential legacy on immigration is at stake and he may be ready to "go big" despite the political ramifications.
"I think the people want the president to be bold," said Petra Falcon, executive director of Promise Arizona, an ­immigration advocacy group. "They want the president to be a leader. He needs to be a problem solver. Right now, the finger-pointing unfortunately is going to be with the Republicans who did not want to act."
The president has taken flak from both sides on immigration reform. He has been criticized by reformers for the record number of ­deportations during his administration. He has been frustrated by Republicans in the House, who declined to take up the Senate-passed bipartisan reform package.
On June 30, Obama signaled that he would try to fix as much of the nation's broken immigration system as he could unilaterally.
He directed Attorney General Eric Holder and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson to identify by summer's end the actions the ­administration legally can take "to do what Congress refuses to do and fix as much of our immigration system as we can" and vowed he would "adopt those recommendations without further delay."
After numerous closed-door meetings, the timeline for presidential action is expected to be early to mid-September, although there already are rumblings that the president should push the decision until after Election Day.
The injection of ­uncertainty — nobody is really sure how voters will react to Obama's ­announcement, which some advocates hope could protect up to 5 million immigrants from deportation — means more anxiety for targeted red-state Democratic senators such as Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Kay Hagan of North Carolina.
All three have said on the record that they would prefer Obama continue to work with lawmakers on the issue rather than go it alone in a far-reaching way.
Executive action by Obama also could put pressure on embattled Democrats in congressional swing districts, such as Reps. Ron Barber, Ann Kirkpatrick and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.
By using his executive authority as president, Obama would try to reshape policy without going to Congress. But whatever he does would not carry the weight of a law and he could provoke a legal challenge if he tries to legislate on his own.
Some of the recommendations Obama may be considering are:
• Expanding his ­Deferred Action for ­Arrivals program. The program is currently limited to young undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as ­minors. Some advocates are recommending that Obama expand the program to include undocumented parents and ­siblings of immigrants already approved.
• Expanding the use of "parole in place" to ­include undocumented immigrants already in the U.S. who are eligible for green cards. That would allow them to get green cards without having to first return to their country and wait 10 years.
• Allow some family members who have been deported to return to the U.S. to reunite with relatives in the U.S. who are citizens through the ­expanded use of "humanitarian parole."
• Allow immigrants who receive deferred action, temporary protected status, asylum or refugee status to join the military and, after serving five years, be eligible for citizenship. Immigrants without permanent residency are currently barred from the military.
There also are indications Obama could make concessions to business interests such as the high-tech industry in hopes of softening opposition to the other policy changes.
But by going "big" and "bold," which is the mantra of the immigration advocates who are urging him on, Obama still likely would turn off reform-friendly Republicans such as McCain and others who supported the Senate bill.
McCain is warning that unilateral executive action would be a death knell for the legislative effort to increase border security, modernize the visa system and offer a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
"It will dramatically inflame the opposition," McCain told The Arizona Republic.
Obama already has concluded, some observers say, that the Republicans in Congress are unlikely to deliver any significant immigration reform during his presidency. As a result, the observers say, the president is now looking toward burnishing his legacy before moving into the lame-duck phase of his second term.
"Is the midterm election his primary concern? I doubt it," said Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, a national organization that advocates for comprehensive immigration reform. "I think his primary concern is playing to the history books.
"He wants to be seen as someone who used every ounce of executive authority to protect as many immigrants as possible,. Not only will he go from being the 'Great Deporter' to the 'Great Emancipator,' but it will define the two ­political parties for a generation."
The short-term cost could be the loss of Senate seats crucial to the Democratic majority and a widening of the gap in the GOP House.
Republicans need to win six seats to take control of the Senate. A political backlash triggered by Obama's immigration action also could cause the Democrats to lose more ground in the House, where Republicans already outnumber Democrats 231-199.
Others think that Obama acting on immigration could benefit the Democrats in the long run. The political upside could become apparent as early as 2016, when the White House next is up for grabs and the Senate battlefield is expected to be more advantageous to the Democrats.
Arizonans weigh in
Rep. Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., said Obama must take action on his own because it is now clear that Congress is not going to act before his second term as president ends. He also argues that Obama is bound to receive criticism from Republicans for taking even limited action on immigration so why not use his authority to protect as many people as possible from deportation?
Grijalva dismisses McCain's claim that Obama will destroy chances for passing an immigration bill if he takes action on his own.
"If the president does something big, it is going to build momentum, maybe not during his time in office, but I guarantee you, whoever runs for president in 2016 will have question Number 1 to answer on the issue of immigration reform," Grijalva said. "The question will be: Are you going to extend (Obama's) executive actions on immigration?"
Rep. David Schweikert, R-Ariz., an opponent of comprehensive immigration reform, said he believes Obama and his Democratic allies likely are counting on a GOP overreaction to whatever he eventually does. If Republicans go too far and, for example, start demanding Obama's impeachment, it would motivate Democratic voters to get to the polls this year, he said.
"I've grown to believe this White House is politics all the time," Schweikert said. "They would be calculating what type of reaction they would get from the right and would that be a reaction enough to energize the Democrat base."
After immigration-reform efforts fell apart in the House, Falcon's organization, Promise Arizona, shifted its attention to push Obama to take action to protect as many undocumented immigrants as possible from deportation and allow them work permits.
"What we want him to do is bring relief to as many of the 11 million undocumented (in the country) as possible," Falcon said.
McCain, however, emphasized his belief that the Constitution's separation of powers don't work that way. ­Immigration reform requires congressional action, he said.
"To me, it's a matter of principle," McCain said. "It should be legislation, not executive fiat."

The execution of James Foley : Dealing with barbarism

An offshoot of al-Qaeda, but more extreme than its parent, the Islamic State seems eager to prove its violent credentials.
The execution of the American journalist James Foley by militants of the Islamic State is a shocking iteration of the group’s barbarity. Foley was a freelance reporter who had been abducted many months ago in Syria. It has now emerged that the IS had demanded $100 million to free him, and that the U.S. government refused, but made a failed attempt to rescue him. It has said it executed Foley in revenge for the U.S. airstrikes against it in Iraq. The execution also came days after the Security Council resolution against the IS and its activities. The group continues to hold one more journalist and has warned that his fate depended on President Barack Obama’s “next decision”. From decreeing that women living in territory under its control would have to undergo genital mutilation, to the massacre of the minority Yazidis, to their latest atrocity, the IS is determined to send out the message to the world that it will stop at nothing to achieve its goal, which is to establish its writ across the Islamic world. An offshoot of al-Qaeda, but more extreme than its parent, the IS seems eager to prove its violent credentials. Yet, precisely in its barbarity lies the hope that it can be stopped. Even most Sunni Muslims in Iraq, where the IS burst on the scene in June, do not subscribe to its extremism or the violence that it espouses. Also, unlike al-Qaeda, whose ambition to propagate an ideology to the entire world through a hydra-headed organisational structure and franchisees makes it much harder to fight, the IS is — at least for the moment — a single entity, locked in its territorial ambitions.
The recent change of guard in Iraq, where Nouri al Maliki stepped down as Prime Minister to make way for Haider al-Abadi, might be of help if the new government that is still taking shape is inclusive of the country’s minority Sunnis. The IS took birth in the violence and chaos that gripped Iraq post-Saddam Hussain. Mr. Maliki was propped up by the U.S., which helped it grow. But the jihadist group really came into its own in the Syrian civil war, and there is no denying that contributing to its dramatic rise was the U.S., which gave regional backing to all manner of extremists in the fight against Bashar al Assad’s regime. That the IS has recruited hundreds of foreign fighters is a cause for concern — dozens of Indians are also reported to have joined the group. Indian security agencies need to be wary of these jihadists re-entering the country and spreading the IS’s toxic ideology here. Foley’s execution is an attack on media freedom, but a group as brutal as the IS cannot be held to any civilised standards. India must redouble its efforts to rescue the 40 Indian workers in IS custody.

British Fighters on Frontline of Islamic State Information War

Security services are racing to identify the Islamic State militant who beheaded U.S. journalist James Foley in Syria. The murderer spoke on camera in English with a British accent. It’s estimated that several hundred British citizens are fighting for the Islamic State, also called ISIL or ISIS, alongside thousands of other foreign jihadists.
With a soundtrack citing verses of the Koran, a video uploaded on social media in June, purportedly by Islamic State militants, incites Muslims from across the world to come to Syria to fight.
One of the militants -- who identifies himself as a British citizen named Abu Dujana Al Hindi -- speaks to the camera in English.
“This is a message to the brothers who have stayed behind," he said. "You need to ask yourselves what prevents you from coming to the land of Izza? [honor], What prevents you from joining the ranks of the Mujahedeen?”
The gruesome beheading of American journalist James Foley was carried out by a man with a British accent. Foreign fighters are a valuable asset for the Islamic State, said terror expert Hannah Stuart of The Henry Jackson Society, a British-based policy group.
“They might not be the best fighters, but they are the best people in an information war. You can put them on camera and recruit widely from among Muslims in Western Europe," said Stuart.
That James Foley’s killer had a British accent was no accident, said American filmmaker Bilal Abdul Karim, who has documented the rise in foreigners fighting in Syria.
"When Brits or Europeans or Westerners appear in the group they are very keen to put them on camera so that they can push their narrative. The reason why a British voice is used for this is because they knew the impact a British voice would make," said Karim, in reference to the fact that hearing a British voice may be a lure for potential recruits.
After starting out as a militant group fighting local conflicts, the Islamic State is now seeking international recognition, said Afzal Ashraf of the Royal United Services Institute.
“What they want is to spread their ideology. They want recognition. They want support. And they will want to get that recognition and support from across the world but particularly from Western countries," said Ashraf.
Another online video from February purports to show a British fighter in Aleppo carrying out a suicide bomb attack on a prison.
Extremist ideologies
Britain has been slow to counter extremist ideologies, according to Harris Rafiq of the counter-extremism group the Quilliam Foundation.
"London historically over the last few decades has had Islamist ideology from groups like the Muslim Brotherhood being taught openly without being challenged," said Rafiq.
Authorities in Britain and the United States are trying to identify James Foley’s killer. The Islamic State’s use of online technology provides opportunities for security services says Professor Peter Neumann, of the International Center for the Study of Radicalization at King’s College London.
"They will speak to other foreign fighters on Twitter, on Facebook, on Whatsapp, on Skype and of course the intelligence services are monitoring these conversations," noted Neumann.
British authorities have appealied to Muslim communities to help identify James Foley’s killer, but acknowledge that bringing him to justice will be extremely difficult.

NOOR JAHAN - JADON HOLI JAI -

Afghanistan football targets qualification for 2022 FIFA World Cup

The Afghanistan National Football team eyes qualification for 2022 FIFA world Cup which is due to be organized in Qatar.
The Afghanistan Football Federation (AFF) said Thursdy an agreement was signed with the Football Federation of Japan in a bid to further boost the capabilities of the Afghan National Football team.
“In line with the development plans of Afghanistan Football Federation, Mr. Keramuddin Karim met his Japanese counterpart Mr. Diani that concluded the following key points in the agreement,” Afghanistan Football Federation (AFF)said following a statement.
According to Afghanistan Football Federation (AFF), equipping the Afghanistan Football Federat (AFF) stadium with Projector lights to enable hosting nighttime matches, construction of a mini-pitch for younger age category teams and the establishment of the first ever professional football academy were the key points where the two sides reached to an agreement.
The federation said, based on a number of development programs on hand, AFF targets qualifying FIFA 2022 World Cup along with other top Asian teams.
An agreement was also reached with NITTAI professional football Academy where the Academy will facilitate more Afghan talents the following years. Based on the agreements those who get nominated to travel to Japan will get professional football training the academy, as well as they can continue their education.
The agreement also covers higher education study opportunities of National Team players. “According to an agreement between Afghanistan Football Federation and Nippon Sport Science University, Afghanistan National Team players at all categories can apply to get scholarships in the university,” the statement said.
The Afghanistan Football Federation (AFF), said the opportunity enables the players to obtain degrees in Sports Management, Coaching and Sports Medical & Nutrition Aids sections.

Obama Holds to Afghanistan Withdrawal Deadline

By MARK LANDLER
President Obama may have ordered American warplanes back to Iraq, but he has not changed his mind about his other big military withdrawal. Mr. Obama told advisers this week that delaying the pullout of American troops from Afghanistan would make no difference there as long as the country did not overcome its political rifts.
The president, a senior administration official said, was rejecting a growing chorus of arguments in Washington that the chaos in Iraq should prompt him to reconsider his timetable for withdrawing the last soldiers from Afghanistan by the end of 2016.
“People have said, ‘Doesn’t this show that you should never take the troops out of Afghanistan?’ ” said the official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. “He said, ‘No, it actually points to the imperative of having political accommodation. There’s a limit to what we can achieve absent a political process.’ ”
Mr. Obama’s comments were particularly pointed, given that Afghanistan’s leadership has been paralyzed for months after a disputed election to replace President Hamid Karzai. The stalemate between the two candidates, Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah, led to fears this week that a cabal of Afghan government ministers with ties to the security forces would seize power and install an interim government.
While Secretary of State John Kerry has been most closely identified with efforts to resolve the dispute — having parachuted into Kabul on two occasions to try to broker a deal — Mr. Obama has telephoned Mr. Ghani and Mr. Abdullah twice each to urge them to work out a compromise.
With its ethnic overtones, the Afghan impasse has obvious parallels to the sectarian rifts in Iraq, which have hindered the formation of a new government and stoked the Islamic militancy there. Mr. Obama’s critics have been quick to draw the comparison.
“I predicted what was going to happen in Iraq,” Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, said on CNN on Aug. 10. “I’m predicting to you now that if we pull everybody out of Afghanistan, not based on conditions, you’ll see that same movie again in Afghanistan.”
Not all the criticism was partisan. Some veterans of the Obama administration argued that the collapse of the Iraqi security forces and the difficulty of forging political compromise in Baghdad were an ominous sign for Afghanistan’s future after the United States departs.
“The entire Afghanistan strategy is based on Iraq,” said Vali R. Nasr, a former State Department official who worked on Afghanistan and Pakistan policy. “This argument that we can stand up a military to do what we ourselves can’t do hasn’t proven out in Iraq.”
Mr. Nasr, now dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, said the White House should leave behind a “credible force” to prevent the Taliban from replicating the advances of the Sunni militant group, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, and to give breathing space to Afghanistan’s fragile political process.
Such a force, he said, would be larger than the dwindling presence planned by the administration — 9,800 troops in 2015, half that in 2016 and a vestigial force thereafter — but far smaller than the 101,000 troops that were in Afghanistan at the peak of American involvement in 2011.
These arguments have registered in a White House confronting a cascade of crises. While there have been no formal deliberations over Afghanistan since the start of the airstrikes in Iraq, this official said, Mr. Obama has discussed the parallels with his senior aides.
The absence of political accommodation in both countries, the president told them, sharply limits the United States’ ability to help. In Afghanistan, even the presence of nearly 29,000 American soldiers has done little to guide the country past its political crisis.
Mr. Obama, his advisers note, did not pick the “zero option” in Afghanistan, which would have meant withdrawing all troops at the end of this year. The United States will marshal the support of NATO allies to train and equip Afghan security forces. And the president’s personal engagement in the issue since the June election is proof, they say, that the United States is not going to stand by as Afghanistan unravels.
“There’s a middle ground between intervention and total disengagement,” the official said.
But Mr. Obama also made clear, when he announced the timetable for drawing down troops last May, that Afghanistan should not rely on the United States to manage the creation of a more stable society. That was up to its own security forces and elected officials, he said.
“We have to recognize that Afghanistan will not be a perfect place, and it is not America’s responsibility to make it one,” the president said, using language he has applied, almost word for word, to Iraq. “The future of Afghanistan must be decided by Afghans.”
Afghanistan is not the only ghost hanging over Mr. Obama’s decision to intervene in Iraq. He himself has invoked the NATO air campaign in Libya in 2011 as an example of the risks of a military intervention that is not backed up with a sufficient political follow-through. The bombs drove Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi from power but left Libya in a lethal vacuum that has been filled with feuding militant groups.
Mindful of that, his advisers said, Mr. Obama has tried to keep the pressure on Baghdad to form a government “front and center” and not define the new mission as purely, or even primarily, a military one.
But the president flatly rejects another assertion made by his critics: that his refusal to supply weapons to moderate rebels in Syria, early on, helped light the extremist fuse that exploded in Iraq. Without knowing who the Syrian rebel groups were, officials said, funneling them arms would not have prevented the rise of ISIS in Iraq.
For Mr. Obama, some analysts said, the strongest link between Iraq and Afghanistan is their place in the history of his presidency. “Intellectually, he is beholden to the notion that his greatest legacy is getting us out of those wars,” Mr. Nasr said.

Signs of Support in Kashmir for Islamic State Alarm Intel Agencies

A massive search has been launched in Jammu and Kashmir to identify the source of banners and flags of militant group Islamic State (IS) that have appeared at three different rallies in the state in the last two months.
With the elections in the state round the corner, India-Pakistan talks failing and the internal instability in Pakistan, security forces have been asked to act swiftly.
"Although we aren't yet clear who is behind it, we are concerned about where these are originating from and how these banner and flags have reached J&K," a senior official at the Ministry of Home Affairs told NDTV.
Security agencies are understood to have drawn up a list of about 50 possible suspects. "We are still in the process of verifying their antecedents," the official added.
Islamic State, the hardline Sunni Muslim jihadist group, has gained control of large parts of Iraq and Syria. It posted a video this week on YouTube showing one of its fighters beheading an American journalist kidnapped in Syria. (Read: Slain Journalist's Employer Publishes Email to Family From Islamic State)
The first reported sighting of IS flags and banners in Kashmir was on June 27, intelligence agency sources told NDTV. This was followed by two more incidents on the day of Eid. Officials, however, do not rule more such incidents going unreported. The first sighting was reported from Zadibal - a Shia-dominated area in Srinagar.
In Iraq and Syria, the IS has been targeting people belonging to non-Sunni sects, particularly the Shias. In Jammu and Kashmir, they make up about 14 per cent of the population.
Intelligence officials believe that four young boys who left their families in Maharashtra in May and have not returned were recruited online by IS to fight in Iraq. Sources say they are worried about web recruitment increasing in India. "We do not rule out the possibility of the people exposed to IS propaganda in the internet self-radicalizing," the official told NDTV and added that "it will be almost impossible to control if people have self-radicalized."
Earlier this month, two men from Tamil Nadu were arrested for allegedly ordering and distributing t-Shirts with the IS emblem - a group photo of people wearing the shirts went viral.

Former President Asif Ali Zardari condoled the death of Sport legend Hashim Khan

http://mediacellppp.wordpress.com/
Co-Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party former President Asif Ali Zardari has expressed deep grief and sorrow over the death of former Squash world champion Hashim Khan, an outstanding sportsman, who died the other day at the age of 100.
In a condolence message, former President Asif Ali Zardari paid rich tributes to Hashim Khan for rendering great services in the field of sports in Pakistan. He was one of the greatest Squash Players of all times, he said.
He prayed Almighty Allah to grant eternal peace to the departed soul and courage and fortitude to the members of the bereaved family to bear this irreparable loss.

Pakistan: PML-N’s Nexus With Banned ASWJ: Takfiri Groups Stage Hateful Rallies Against PTI, PAT Sit-Ins

shiapost.com
Pro-Taliban Takfiris of Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam Fazl (JUI- F) and banned Ahl-e-Sunnat Wal-Jamaat on Friday held rallies across the country against ‘Azadi March’ led by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and ‘Inqilab March’ led by Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT), by showing their full support with ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), who is known as Saudi man as Pakistani Prime Minister Mian Nawaz Sharif, The Shia Post reported.
The federal capital Islamabad saw a rally staged by banned takfiri terrorists of pro-Taliban ‘Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat’ (ASWJ) known as Sipah-e-Sahaba (SSP) for so-called entitled ‘Pakistan’s satiability’, while chanting hateful slogans against Shia Muslims. The terrorists of ASWJ also chanted slogans against founder of Islamic Revolution Iran, Imam Khumaini (R.A).
Ruling government of Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PMLN) has strong relationships with ASWJ terrorist group. According to a source, PM Nawaz Sharif asked pro-Taliban ASWJ head terrorist Ahmed Ludhyanvi to organize rallies in Islamabad in attempt to cause Daroodi vs Baroodi clash.
The rally of ASWJ started from controversial mosque ‘Lal Masjid’, where terrorists find a safe stay and get their brain washed in order to carry out suicide attack on innocent citizens of Pakistan.
According to details, JUI-F carried rallies and protests across the country today (Friday) in pretext of its previous calls against the protestors’ sit in, in the federal capital in which it raised slogans against the protesting leaders i.e. Imran Khan and Tahir-ul-Qadri.
Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam-Fazal (JUI-F) Chief Maulana Fazl Ur Rahman on Friday termed demands of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf and Pakistan Awami Tehreek Pakistan unconstitutional.
Talking to media outside the Parliament House he said, “All the political parties in parliament are unanimous that Prime Minister Muhammad Nawaz Sharif should not resign from premiership.”
Fazal Ur Rehman said that all those who have struggled for the constinuation of so-called democracy in Pakistans are united to safeguard it from the violators.
Shia political leading party Majlis-e-Wahdat-e-Muslmeen (MWM) is supporting Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) and also demanding the resignation of Pakistani PM Nawaz Sharif.
On Saturday 16 August, Lahore court of an additional district and sessions judge (ADSJ) on Saturday ordered the police to register a murder case against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar and 19 others on charges of killing 14 persons in police firing at the Minhajul Quran secretariat, Model Town, on June 16.
ADSJ Ajmal Khan issued the order after accepting a petition moved by the Minhajul Quran director administration, Jawad Hamid. The petitioner said he had submitted an application to the Faisal Town SHO for registration of a murder case against the prime minister, Punjab chief minister, interior minister, Member National Assembly Hamza Shahbaz, former law minister Rana Sanaullah, Railways Minister Khawaja Saad Rafique, Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif, Information Minister Pervaiz Rashid, State Minister for Water and Power Abid Sher Ali, Deputy Inspector General (Operations) Rana Abdul Jabbar, Model Town Superintendent Tariq Aziz, Superintendent (Headquarters) Maroof Safdar Wahla, Civil Lines Superintendent Umar Cheema, the security superintendent, the Model Town assistant commissioner, a town municipal officer, Kahna SHO Inspector Ishtiaq and Nishtar Town SHO Ahmad Majeed Usman. However, the police paid no heed to his genuine request. The court ruled in its order, “In view of the above discussion, the application in hand is hereby accepted and the respondent (SHO) is directed to register the FIR on the application of the petitioner and then proceed in accordance with the law in investigation.”
The court dismissed the arguments of the deputy public prosecutor that a second FIR of the same occurrence could not be lodged.
Relying upon the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Wajid Ali Durrani case, the court further ruled that registration of a second FIR about the same occurrence was not barred under the law.
The court ruled the apex court’s observation revealed that if subsequent information given to a police officer disclosed a different offence, which was also cognizable by the police, then unless it was a mere amplification of the first version, must be recorded by the police.
“The complainant of FIR No 510/14 is a police officer and he has also been sited as one of the accused in the application of the petitioner,” the court further added. “It is further observed that in the first FIR it is absolutely not mentioned whether any person had died during the occurrence or not and this fact by itself exposed the worth of this FIR.”
“Perusal of the FIR No 510/14 and the application of the petitioner reveals that version of the petition is not the repetition of the contents of the first FIR. The petitioner has levelled a very serious allegation against the proposed accused that they in connivance with each other committed the murder of 14 innocent persons and injured a huge number of people.”
The court said, “It is further observed that the contention of the deputy public prosecutor that the second FIR cannot be registered looses its substance as the local police has already recorded second FIR No 511/14 dated 18-06-2014 against one Gullu Butt who allegedly participated in the same occurrence which is a subject matter of FIR NO 510/14 and petitioner’s application.” The court also disagreed with the deputy prosecutor’s statement that the petitioner was not an aggrieved person and ruled, “The petitioner is admittedly the director administration of Minhajul Quran the place of occurrence and as per his version a number of activities and students belonging to Minhajul Quran have been murdered by the proposed accused, therefore, the petitioner also become the aggrieved person.”
The court ruled that in the given circumstances, the respondent had not discharged his legal obligation as he should have registered an FIR on the application of the petitioner. Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) demanded of the government negotiation committee that an FIR of the Model Town tragedy must be registered. It also demanded that both Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Chief Minister Punjab Shahbaz Sharif must step down without any further loss of time. The demands were presented by a seven-member PAT team during the first phase of a dialogue with a delegation comprising the government and opposition parties.
In its first demand, the PAT said that all those nominated in the FIR of Model Town killings should be arrested and brought to justice while in its second demand, PAT said that federal and Punjab governments should be removed to ensure transparent investigations into the Model Town case. “We don’t have any hope for justice as long as Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif are in power,” the PAT said.
Talking to media persons after the first round of talks, the PAT leader Raheeq Abbasi said: “We have presented our demands and now government’s team will talk to high-ups for getting their response”. The government-opposition delegation which held talks with PAT comprised Ahsan Iqbal, General Abdul Qadri Baloch (Retd), Haider Abbas Rizvi and Ijazul Haq. The name of Khawaja Saad Rafique, who was initially was named as one of the members of the delegation, was later dropped on an objection raised by PAT’s team.
http://en.shiapost.com/2014/08/22/pml-ns-nexus-with-banned-aswj-takfiri-groups-stage-hateful-rallies-against-pti-pat-sit-ins/

Pakistan: The PTI’s march in Punjab has hit the PML-N where it hurts the most

BY AZIZ-UD-DIN AHMAD
Bearding the lion in its den
Before reaching Islamabad Imran Khan had already brought the arrogance ridden PML-N to its knees. The top leadership of the party, which had let loose its ministers to make fun of Imran Khan for fourteen months, was almost begging for talks and willing to yield to demands that it once dismissed with disdain.
A panic stricken administration was found incapable of coping with two protests simultaneously, the one by Imran Khan and the other by Tahirul Qadri. Consequently, it resorted to desperate measures that disturbed normal life throughout Punjab. Those living in Lahore were the worst sufferers. The administration was badly exposed when it ordered the lock down a part of the city and created an artificial shortage of petrol all over the province to stop the PTI motorists from proceeding on the march. This was bound to cause suffering to the citizens. The government commandeered hundreds of private containers to block the roads causing shortages of essential items and stopping exports from the industrial areas to Karachi port. The intercity movement of commuters was affected. Shahbaz Sharif had to apologise to people for the inconvenience caused by the measures.
The government acted ineptly in handling the first political challenge of its tenure. This raised e questions about how it would deal with greater challenges of the sort likely to emerge in days to come.
The attack on PTI’s peaceful marchers in Gujranwala again exposed the intolerant mindset of the PML-N. Gujranwala is supposed to be a stronghold of the ruling party. This made it all the more necessary for the leadership to keep party workers under control. The party leadership and the Punjab government simply failed to restrain these workers. If Shahbaz Sharif cannot discipline his activists after giving permission to PTI to take out the march, this would send a disquieting message to the entire opposition. The PML-N workers attacked Imran Khan’s container and tore down PTI hoardings in Gujranwala. If the PTI was to act similarly, violence would engulf Punjab. This would provide an excuse to the army to move in.
The attack on PTI’s peaceful marchers in Gujranwala again exposed the intolerant mindset of the PML-N. Gujranwala is supposed to be a stronghold of the ruling party.
This is the second incident of violence against the PML-N’s critics in the last two months. In the earlier incident police had shot down at least 14 workers of PAT in Lahore while Gullu Butt, a PML-N worker, had a field day vandalalising cars of the PAT’s workers under police watch. Gullu Butt has now become a part of our political vocabulary signifying an intolerant and aggressive mindset.
The PTI has presented come up as a major opposition party challenging the PML-N in its stronghold of Punjab. Significantly, many who turned up for the march did not belong to the so called burger class. It proved that the PTI has attracted a sufficiently large cadre of jiyalas or highly motivated workers from lower middle class also.
The march also exposed some of the vulnerabilities of the PTI. The party failed to get even a fraction of the hundred thousand outriders on motorbikes it was expecting would lead the mach from Lahore. Had the party been able to attract large crowds in Gujranwala, few would have dared to brickbat its marchers or demonstrate against the party.
The PTI also failed to achieve the avowed aim of the march, which was getting Nawaz Sharif’s resignation. The Azadi march was presented as a “final battle” to root out the corrupt and bring in “a fair system in the country”, “monarchy” was to be replaced with democracy. In a speech on August 3 at PTI workers’ convention, Imran Khan said the sit-in will not end until a ‘new Pakistan’ comes into existence. The party failed to achieve any of these objectives.
What remains to be seen is whether Khan will be able to persuade his workers to be contented with much less than he had promised them. His opponent would meanwhile accuse him of indulging in hype and jugglery that characterises run of the mill politicians.
First demanding the setting up of a caretaker set-up comprising technocrats, Imran Khan beat a hasty retreat when the statement led to protests and a mini-rebellion in party leadership. This was the first display of public dissent in the party.
Imran Khan’s shifting positions have dented his credibility. On July 3 the PTI chief said that he was willing to call off the August 14 long march on Islamabad if the Supreme Court opened a probe into election rigging in four constituencies. When Nawaz Sharif agreed to the probe, Khan demanded the prime minister’s resignation first.
The march also exposed some of the vulnerabilities of the PTI. The party failed to get even a fraction of the hundred thousand outriders on motorbikes it was expecting would lead the mach from Lahore.
The march was a solo flight. No major opposition party was willing to support it. Having been abandoned by PTI which did not wait for him despite an earlier agreement, Tahiriul Qadri left Lahore from a different route and went and took out a separate protest march. Important opposition leaders accused Khan of taking issues which could best be resolved in parliament to streets and thus weakening the system. Some wondered if he was acting on behest of the powers that be. Jamaat-i-Islami, which is PTI’s coalition partner in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, was reluctant to join the “Azadi March”.
If Imran was relying on the khakis help, they declined to oblige him. There is a perception that they were more interested in giving a shake up to the PML-N regime than give Imran a helping hand as they consider him a bigger headache than Nawa Sharif.
If the PTI march had not been attacked in Gujranwala, the tone of the PTI leaders would have became less strident as they moved towards Islamabad. The march reflects the inability on the part of the political parties to sort out their differences through peaceful parleys. Intolerance, which characterizes both the PML-N and PTI, forced them into confrontation. The undemocratic attitude at the top is highly infectious and is acquired by the workers. Both parties find it difficult to resolve their differences peacefully. Unless they overcome this, they are likely to put the system in danger through no-holds-barred confrontations.
Issues like rigging could have been resolved in the parliament. The parliament alone can work out electoral reforms to ensure that the flaws in the system are removed. The PML-N leadership has, however, discredited the parliament by remaining absent most of the time from its sittings. Nawaz Sharif did not attend a single sitting of the senate for a whole year. This provided an excuse to the PTI to take to the streets. If the PML-N does not take parliament seriously other opposition parties too might take recourse to agitation in the days to come.

Pakistan: Guessing game

Even in the best-case scenario, finding some kind of middle ground between the PTI and Tahirul Qadri on one side and the PML-N federal government on the other would have been difficult.
But the skittishness both sides have showed on engaging each other at all has made the possibility of a negotiated political settlement that much more difficult. After finally accepting that talks could provide a way out of the impasse and proposing a raft of ideas, the PTI quickly re-escalated matters yesterday by rejecting talks altogether.
Meanwhile, after overnight speculation that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif would at long last use parliament as the forum to address the country and his opponents, Mr Sharif proved true to form and declined to take centre stage in that most democratic of forums, the floor of the National Assembly.
One side of the problem here is clearly the PTI supremo Imran Khan’s flip-flop approach to talks, sometimes seemingly wanting an exit from the corner he has painted himself and his party into, while at other times seemingly indulging in rabble-rousing in front of the crowd that has assembled at his demand.
At times, it is difficult to know who is in charge — the PTI chief or the crowd he has assembled — given that the PTI switches back and forth between providing a glimmer of hope and returning to its maximalist position with breathtaking speed.
For a country that has seen much political turmoil over its seven decades of existence, it would not be out of place to suggest that never before has Pakistan seen a political party and its leader demonstrate such whimsicalness on the national stage as it has with the PTI in recent days.
Even so, efforts at talks must not be abandoned, and despite inflexible demands the government must push on, while the PTI must refrain from imposing preconditions.
If Mr Khan and his PTI’s strategy is difficult to comprehend, the other side of the protest movement against the PML-N government — Tahirul Qadri and his supporters — are virtually impossible to fathom.
Mr Qadri, a religious preacher with a small but fervid support base, is truly seeking to hijack the country and impose his will upon it. To the extent that he has made demands calling for improvements in governance and public service delivery, Mr Qadri makes some sense.
But anything more and he will need to prove he has genuine political support by participating in the electoral process. Surely, the political process is open enough to allow Mr Qadri to prove his legitimate support base.
At the other end, regrettably, Prime Minister Sharif failed to capitalise on the mood in parliament yesterday. The parliamentary resolution reiterating that democracy is the only way ahead for Pakistan would have been that much more meaningful had the prime minister himself added his voice to the consensus.

Bilawal Bhutto expresses grief over Peshawar rain-related deaths

http://www.ppp.org.pk/
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, Patron-In-Chief, Pakistan Peoples Party has expressed deep grief and sorrow over the loss of seven people following heavy downpour in Peshawar yesterday.
In a press statement issued here, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said the innocent lives lost in natural vagary in Khyber-Pakhtoonkhwa should create sympathy in the hearts of Chief Minister KPK and provincial government and both should divert their attention towards the sufferings of the people of Peshawar in the monsoon instead of attending music concerts in Islamabad.
He expressed sympathy with the families of victims and asked PPP’s Peshawar chapter to personally visit the affected families and provide solace to them.

Music: Ager Tum Mil jao

Iggy Azalea - "FANCY" Live at Hot97 Summer Jam 2014