Tuesday, January 29, 2013

The young are the hope to rejuvenate Egypt

By HALA ELKHOLY
Mistaken are those who think the young are helpless. Egypt began to demonstrate exactly that two years ago Jan. 25. Today it still does. In the lead-up to Egypt’s third year of revolution, groups of young, angry and disappointed Egyptians showcased their ability to dissent in a series of events around the capital. Jan. 23, hundreds of the “Ultras,” originally organized to support their favorite soccer team, flooded an underground metro station and blocked the tracks for a few hours. Simultaneously, they brought Cairo’s 6th of October Bridge, which cuts across the city from east to west, to a halt amidst the end-of-day rush hour, paralyzing traffic all around the city. Their rowdy sit-in around the main downtown stock exchange rounded up their warning signals. This young group might not have been among the main dissenting groups demanding change two years ago, but they have developed today into a forceful group with a grievance they will not ignore. Their initial involvement in Egypt’s Tahrir Square in the earlier stages of the Egyptian revolution shed light on their abilities to organize and their numbers around the country. They developed from young, energetic soccer fans to a true patriotic stakeholder following the brutal massacre in Port Said February 2012. The Port Said Massacre took the lives of 70 fans and their friends. The survivors will not forget and will not forgive easily. They have since awaited legal justice. Jan. 23, they announced they have had enough dallying in the courts. A verdict was postponed to Jan. 25, with rumors it could be postponed again. They might not be the biggest groups, they might not be the greatest politicians and they might not be the only revolutionaries, but they are, however, the youngest and therefore a force to be reckoned with. Their power stems from their values, for unlike adults, they have not yet learned to compromise. Their integrity, their pain and their loyalty to their massacred friends continue to ignite their drive to demand justice. Unlike their seniors, they have an unrestricted imagination, flowing energy and very strong links to each other. They believe in the virtues of right and wrong enough to fight for them vehemently. The one thing they are not afraid of is death. In all their recent chants, they declare they are willing to die if justice to their martyrs is not served. “Justice to them or we die like them,” is a translation of one of their popular slogans. It has already been two years since the first wave of revolution; the second wave is just beginning. Time is of the essence to all in Egypt. The old should never underestimate the young. The passage of time adds to the young and younger, while it takes away from the old. The future is theirs and the present will be shortly. It would be wise of the old not to underestimate their young. Unarmed with experience, unlimited by boundaries, unrestricted in their hearts and thoughts, youthfulness is their power. They will carve their way through. They are the hope for Egypt; the oldest human civilization, to once again rejuvenate and become youthful. We have been warned.

EGYPT: ''Conjuring the demon''

BY:Rana Allam
Morsy, you are now face to face with those who have lost everything, including their hope for a better future and their faith in you
So the president waves his forefinger at us during a long awaited speech amid bloodshed and chaos, declaring a 30-day curfew in the three major canal cities and a state of emergency, while allowing harsher measures to be taken by his now-beloved Ministry of Interior. It is quite interesting that he would impose curfew in Ismailia (which didn’t have much rioting until the curfew decision!) and leave Cairo, which is paralysed by the violence in its downtown area and the frequent cutting of major roads and bridges. These are of course questions to be asked and never answered. Egypt is bursting with opposition to this decision, except of course those who support Morsy (no matter what he does and before he does it), and those who believe that crushing people will bring “stability”. I am not one of those; I am against all acts of violence and oppression. A state of emergency and curfews and more weapons are never the solution. Besides, what will be the gain from announcing a state of emergency? The police already detain people without warrants; many were taken from their homes in the past few days. Also, Egyptians never respect curfews; they held protests during curfew hours right after the president’s speech. So basically, the only gain is legalising random detention and allowing the use of lethal weapons in facing protesters. Admittedly, we are hearing of protesters carrying firearms, which was not the case two years ago, back then the strength was in the numbers of protesters and the rocks they managed to find on the streets. But then, isn’t it Morsy and Co’s strategy to leave the MOI as corrupt as it has always been, so now heavy firearms are sold everywhere for reasonable prices? They have left the MOI without punishment for their crimes, isn’t it a consequence that everyone is becoming a criminal? Didn’t they insist on keeping that failure of a government until people became hungry with no hope to eat? These are not the people fighting for a constitution…they are fighting for food, for justice, for survival. They can burn it all down. Morsy, if you think that meeting the opposition figures on a “national dialogue” will bring an end to this, you are completely delusional. To think that the shameful National Salvation Front or the weak political parties or even the popular activists can put a stop to this, or have any control over those on the streets, you must be joking. You are not fighting ElBaradei’s fans, nor Hamdeen’s, nor even Shafiq’s. The ladies and gents of Heliopolis and Zamalek are no longer your battle, you have moved behind those who have good jobs and posh homes. You are now face to face with those who have lost everything, including their hope for a better future and their faith in you. It will not be the likes of me marching on those protests anymore, it will be those who can handle violence, those who have nothing left to lose, who are way too many and way too chaotic. Now those who support Morsy’s crackdown on Egyptians believe that we can only be controlled by force. Those fools who, because they can only survive as slaves, think that all Egyptians are like them, and they repeat their revolution-days rhetoric, slamming us with the forever boring question: “what is the solution? You are complaining over and over… do you have a better solution to stop the bloodshed, and get the criminals and killers off the streets? Do you have a better solution than the use of force?” Well, I don’t have a solution. But then again, I am not the one who caused this deadlock, and as the Egyptian proverb goes: That who conjured the demon, should exorcise it! I am also quite positive that if our rulers want a peaceful solution, they can find one. If they realise that they are no longer an illegal organisation, if they move beyond the phobia of those trying to overthrow their regime, beyond the treason conspiracy theories. If only they ask themselves, why were people out on the streets in the first place? Maybe then , they will realise that it is Morsy and Co’s fault. They did this! Their interior ministry did this by continuing to torture people and detain them for no reason, while not doing their real job of maintaining peace and order on the streets. Their cabinet and its continuing failures in all aspects, on top of which the economic disaster we are living. Their constituent assembly and its deformed constitution. Their judges and their political agendas. Their counsellors, and their guidance bureau who time after time prove their ignorance of strategy and policy making, and most importantly how they ignore the poor people of this country. The solution is never weapons and force and detentions; it might give them a momentary gain, but it will backfire at the slightest spark. Even if they can control it now, can they control it a week from now? How long can their uniforms sustain dealing with this chaos? Those fighting you now are the Egyptians who are frustrated with their miserable daily hardships, their every day struggle, and guess what? They have no leader, but apparently they have a lot of weapons… and you have taken away their hope! Deal with it… and never ask me to approve of curfews and emergency laws and murder!

Opposition rejects Morsy’s call for dialogue

Egyptian opposition leaders have again rejected President Mohamed Morsy’s invitation to national dialogue, insisting the calls were insincere and demanding their own preconditions be met first. “This call for dialogue is for show, it is not serious. We have presented certain conditions for any serious dialogue and if they remain unmet we will not go to dialogue just to pose for the camera,” said National Salvation Front (NSF) leader Mohamed ElBaradei. He added that Egypt was currently facing many problems like the economy, poor security situation and political instability. “We have already presented our demands such as a new national unity government to address these problems, the dissolving of the Shura Council and amending the flawed constitution,” ElBaradei added. Popular Current leader Hamdeen Sabahy called on Morsy to admit full responsibility for the deaths of at least 40 people since Friday. The president must clearly state he respects the demands of Egyptians and their protesting, Sabahy added. “We reject all forms of violence, but a distinction should be made between the street’s violence, which is due to the lack of a political situation and the Ministry of Interior’s violence which has been unprecedented,” the third placed presidential runner up added. The Minister of Interior must be dismissed and put on trial, Sabahy added. “The National Salvation Front is preparing a comprehensive plan for Egypt that tackles the economy, political and security situations,” said former Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa. The Front said it rejects what it called Morsy’s threats. “The last person who threatened us was [former President Hosni] Mubarak,” said lawyers’ syndicate chairman Sameh Ashour. “There can be no dialogue while Egyptians are being killed, injured and arrested at the hands of the regime,” the NSF said in a statement. Finally, the opposition bloc reiterated its calls for protests next Friday if its demands remain unmet. “We will call for the revocation of the constitution and a return to the modified 1971 one as well as early presidential elections if the president does not respond to our demands.”

Egypt army chief warns of 'state collapse'

Defence minister says ongoing unrest, which has killed more than 50 people, "could lead to grave repercussion".
The Egyptian defence minister, General Abdel Fattah al-Sissi, has given warning that the unrest sweeping the country could lead to the collapse of the state. Failure to resolve the situation "could lead to grave repercussions if the political forces do not act" to tackle it, Sissi said on Tuesday, in comments posted on his Facebook page. "The continuing conflict between political forces and their differences concerning the management of the country could lead to a collapse of the state and threaten future generations," he said. His comments were excerpted from a speech he gave to students at a military academy. Sissi, who is also the head of Egypt's military, further said that the political, economical, social and security problems facing Egypt constitute "a threat to the country's security and stability". His comments will be seen as a warning to Egypt's political class, which has done little to end the unrest.

Karzai: Afghan government should lead peace talks

Associated Press
Afghanistan's president warned on Tuesday that all efforts at peace talks with the Taliban should go through the government, and appealed on the country's powerbrokers not to engage in such negotiations if the authorities are sidelines. Hamid Karzai insisted the government — and not foreign powers — must lead the talks if the country is to have any hope of emerging from a decade of fighting as a strong and unified nation. He said some Afghan powerbrokers and prominent political figures had been approached by foreign powers to hold talks through side channels, rather than working through the High Peace Council set up by the Afghan government. "All our politicians must know that the peace process will only have a good result if we are unified and the process goes forward and the process will go forward through the High Peace Council," Karzai said. The president said participating in talks with the Taliban without the government would weaken the country and urged all to refuse those offers. The Afghan peace process has made little headway since it began several years ago and has been hobbled by distrust between the Afghan government and the United States. Karzai has repeatedly decried foreign, and specifically American, efforts to jumpstart the talks while keeping the Afghan government in the dark. On Tuesday, Karzai upbraided his Western allies for trying to undermine what he said had to be an Afghan process. Though he referred mostly to the interference of "foreigners" in general, Karzai at one point directly targeted the United States, which is in the process of negotiating terms for its long-term presence in the country. "We told American government during our recent visit that no foreigners should try to hold the Afghan peace process in their hands," Karzai said. Since U.S.-backed talks broke down last March in a dispute over the release of five Taliban detainees held in American custody at a military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the High Peace Council has tried to take a greater role. The Taliban, meanwhile, have established a presence in Qatar and the council says they are hoping to be involved in talks with those in the Doha office. "I want to call on the Taliban and our politicians not to let the foreigners cheat them. Peace is only possible from one source: the High Peace Council, which includes all Afghans, all parties," Karzai said. Karzai spoke Tuesday at a conference about water management, where he first talked about the need for clean water systems and then broke off to address what he described as a "very important issue" — the varied attempts at peace talks with the Taliban.

Peshawar Sikhs worried, insecure over kidnappings

Insecurity has increased in the minority Sikh community of Peshawar city in northwest Pakistan after the kidnapping of a Sikh man and the killing of another, a media report said today. Mohinder Singh, a seller of herbal medicines, was kidnapped in Khyber tribal region last November. His mutilated body was found in a deserted location in the tribal belt last month. Last week, kidnappers took away Raghbir Singh, a 40-year- old cloth dealer, from near his house at Quaidabad on the outskirts of Peshawar. Local residents said Singh, a father of four, was on way back home from a gurdwara when the armed abductors overpowered him, bundled him into their car and took him to an unknown location. "The Sikh community is disturbed over the two incidents. They have approached some senior government officials to seek their help in recovery of Raghbir Singh but things are yet to work in their favour," former Deputy Attorney General Khurshid Khan told The News. Khan, who has close links with the Sikhs and often performs 'seva' at gurdwaras, visited a Sikh shrine in Peshawar and expressed his sympathies with around 200 elders of the community over the killing of Mohinder Singh and the kidnapping of Raghbir Singh. Sikhs are a peaceful community and were never involved in any kind of crime but they were suffering for the past few years due to kidnappings, said Khan. Around 3,000 Sikhs have settled in Peshawar, mostly in Dabgari area, while hundreds more live in other districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province and Khyber and Orakzai tribal regions. Members of the Sikh community said they have lodged a First Information Report about the kidnapping of Raghbir Singh at Bhanamari police station but no progress had been reported so far in tracing him. Sikh elders met Haroon Bilour, advisor to the Khyber- Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister, to seek his help for the safe recovery of the kidnapped man. Bilour assured the elders that he would take up the matter with relevant government agencies. Some years ago, 33-year-old Sikh IT professional Robin Singh was kidnapped from Peshawar. He later returned home safe and sound. Before that, three other Sikhs were kidnapped from Khyber Agency in January 2010. One of them, Jaspal Singh, was later killed while the two others were rescued during a military operation.

Punjab govt’s love for Turkish companies wears off after alleged exchequer loss

The employees of the Turkish company managing the parking lots in the metropolitan have been allegedly causing a loss to the government exchequer, forcing the authorities concerned to involve other international firms in the bidding process, Pakistan Today has learnt. Lahore Parking Company (Le-Park) is going to bid the parking areas of metropolitan in a joint venture with other international companies apart from the Turks. The company prefers to hand over the parking contract with the joint venture. Mainly, the companies from Germany, Austria and Saudi Arab are interested for the parking area of Lahore. The companies will manage the working with the local contracts that have the international license. Sources on good authority revealed that the revenue collection of a major site, Liberty Market, dropped suddenly since the Turks took over. The Turkish company may also be replaced, the sources said, adding that the Turks had failed to provide appropriate service at parking stands of the Liberty. “The company does not have enough capacity or size to handle a place like Liberty,” the source said, adding that “The machines at Liberty are all worn out and some of them are not even working. The company is still using the old system to issue parking tickets. The Turkish company is using tickets printed in Turkey, which are in Turkish, instead of using the ones printed by the City District Government Lahore (CDGL). Taking to Pakistan Today the Officials of Le-Park said, “The companies of west are more professional and more competent and the Turks aren’t really doing a good job,” adding that many companies were showing interest in the parking stands of Lahore. “Our options are open and for future ventures we might consider other companies. We will learn from our experiences with the Turkish companies and that will help us improve our service,” they added.

Policeman killed in attack on polio vaccination team in Swabi

Unknown gunmen attacked a polio immunisation team in Gullu Dheri area of Swabi district on Monday killing a policeman who was escorting the team. The two assailants, who were riding a motorcycle, fled from the area after the attack. SHO of Swabi police station told Dawn.com that the two lady health workers, comprising the anti-polio team, remained unhurt and were sent back to their unit, adding that the anti-polio campaign continued in other parts of the province. The body of the deceased policeman was shifted to the District headquarters Hospital Swabi. Dr Riaz, incharge of the polio campaign said that 538 teams, comprising of 754 lady health workers, were operating for the eradication of the polio virus and that each team was escorted by a policeman. He further said that a meeting would be held with the DCO and DPO to discuss the future of the three-day immunisation campaign which was scheduled from Jan 28 till Jan 30. No group had claimed responsibility for the attack till the filing of this report. Nine polio workers were killed in a string of attacks targeting the immunisation workers across the country in Dec 2012.

Bill Gates to affirm resolve to root out polio

DAILY TIMES
Billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates will this week deliver the annual BBC Richard Dimbleby Lecture in which he will spell out his commitment to rid the world of poliovirus, which can cause paralysis and even death within hours. Medical experts have demanded concrete steps to eradicate poliovirus from affected countries of the world. According to them, it is high time for making a strong strategy to protect children from this crippling disease. Bill Gates is the single most influential voice in global health, so when he turns his attention to an issue, it is worth listening. Through the Gates Foundation, Gates and his wife Melinda have already given away nearly $30 billion of their fortune and there are tens of billions more in the pipeline. He has spoken of his passionate belief in the power of vaccines and his determination to defeat polio. In his lecture Gates will liken the pace of innovation in computers with the fight against polio. He will say, “In the late 1970s we had a dream of giving everybody access to computer technology – a vision of a computer on every desktop. Now there is a computer in every pocket. The pace of innovation keeps getting faster. The same is true of polio. It was first recognised at least 4,000 years ago, but it was just 200 years ago we figured out it’s contagious – just 100 years ago we learned it’s a virus. Just 50 years ago we developed the vaccine to prevent it. Just 25 years ago we resolved to eradicate it.” But Gates will also acknowledge that the final push against polio is proving extremely difficult. “I can say without reservation that the last mile is not only the hardest mile, it’s also much harder than I expected,” he said. The killing of nine health workers last month was a reminder of the challenges facing those trying to chase down the virus and protect every last child. Part of polio’s danger is its utter portability – it can be spread across borders by one infected traveller, who can continue to transfer virus for weeks. Only last week an emergency vaccination programme was ordered in Cairo after samples of the poliovirus were found in sewage – the strain matches that in Pakistan. The oral polio vaccine can –in very rare cases – trigger polio. The World Health Organisation says this happens in one in 2.5 million first doses of vaccine. Over the past decade 15 billion doses of polio vaccine drops have been given and there have been 200 confirmed cases of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus. But with naturally occurring polio cases now so low there is a minority which claims the oral live vaccine is causing significant harm. This is a now or never moment – exterminate polio from the planet over the next few years or face a humiliating retreat which could see the virus re-emerge in scores of countries. Gates recognises what is at stake for global health: “Polio eradication is a proving ground, a test. It will reveal what human beings are capable of, and suggest how ambitious we can be about our future.”

Pakistan: PPP smells efforts to impose unconstitutional rule

Daily Times
Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Senator Raza Rabbani has said that efforts are being made by undemocratic forces to install unconstitutional government in the country for the next two to three years. During an informal talk to the media on Monday, Rabbani said that dissolution of the Election Commission of Pakistan would be an unconstitutional move. The senior PPP leader said that efforts were being made to create conditions similar to those of the 1977 general election in the country. He said that under a deliberate attempt, some elements were trying to damage the credibility of the ECP and make it controversial. He said that undemocratic forces were trying to postpone the election and there was a sword hanging over the democratic process. “The future of democratic process hangs in the balance.” Rabbani said that the only constitutional move available to remove chief election commissioner or members of the ECP was to use Article 209. He urged all democratic forces to unite and jointly fight those who wanted to derail the democratic process, and foil all conspiracies aimed at creating anarchy in the country. The senator’s comments came at a moment when the country prepares for historic general election.

Pakistan's economic woes are being overlooked

By Bruce Stokes
Pakistan is a country beset with political difficulties, but they could be of secondary importance to its economic woes. While much attention has been devoted to the dramatic Supreme Court move to order the arrest of Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf on charges of corruption and recent large-scale protests led by populist cleric Tahirul Qadri to demand the resignation of the government ahead of elections due in May, the country's financial difficulties have been overlooked. Likewise recent deadly militant bombings have also distracted attention, as have skirmishes with India on the Line of Control (LoC) that divides the disputed Kashmir region. These headline-grabbing events have not only served to obscure the profound economic challenges facing Pakistani society but in many cases have also nurtured and aggravated them.
'Deteriorating economy'
The truth is that the Pakistani people are deeply troubled by the plight of their economy and their own economic prospects. With the government likely to ask the International Monetary Fund this year for a new aid package, the nation's economic plight may soon become topic number one in the global discussion about Pakistan's future. "Deep seated structural problems and weak macroeconomic policies have continued to sap the [Pakistani] economy's vigour," the IMF's executive board concluded in late November. Economic growth over the past four years, after adjustment for inflation, averaged 2.9% annually, and is projected to be only 3.2% in 2012-13. That, says the IMF, is not sufficient to achieve significant improvement in living standards and to absorb the rising labour force. All this at a time when prices are rising about 11% per year. Moreover, the government deficit was 8.5% in the last fiscal year and press reports suggest it may miss its budget deficit target this year by a significant amount. The IMF expects foreign reserves this fiscal year to be half what they were just two years ago, a sign of waning investor confidence and a deteriorating international economic situation. Hardly surprising then that the Pakistani people are extremely downbeat. 'Personal pain' Roughly nine out of 10 say the economy is bad, including a majority (64%) who think that it is very bad, according to the 2012 Pew Global Attitudes survey. Just 9% rate the economy positively. There has in fact been a sharp decline in economic ratings in Pakistan since the beginning of the global economic recession. In 2007, 59% said the economy was doing well; by 2008, this percentage had dropped to 41% and has continued to fall since then. A plurality (43%) believes the economy will only worsen. For many of them, this pain will be felt personally. Their assessment of their own personal economic situation is down 19 percentage points since 2008, one of the largest fall-offs among the 15 countries for which the Pew Research Centre has comparable data. Only 38% say they are better off than their parents. More than half (57%) say they are worse off than five years ago. And 65% say it will be very difficult for their children to
advance economically.
Unemployment is one of the public's major concerns. Nine out of 10 people say that the lack of jobs is a very big problem, a more important issue to them than concern about corrupt political leaders or unrest in Kashmir. However because the survey was conducted in the spring of 2012, it could be that concern about Kashmir has risen more recently because of flare-ups in January along the LoC. While it is true that issues of life and death and war and peace will always trump economic news, the dire nature of Pakistan's economic problems could ultimately feed political and social unrest as the regional and global discussion about Pakistan's future moves to centre stage. Polling suggests that the people of Pakistan may say this refocusing is long overdue.

Pakistan Army likely to begin training Afghan forces

Islamabad and Kabul are close to signing a deal that will allow the Pakistan Army to train Afghan national security forces, in the latest sign of improving ties between the neighbouring nations.
The progress was made during talks between visiting Afghan Defence Minister Bismillah Khan Mohammadi and army chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani at the General Headquarters in Rawalpindi on Monday. Pakistan has long been offering Afghanistan to train its army but, until now, Kabul had shown little interest, largely due to the trust deficit between the two countries. The talks, led by the Afghan defence minister and the Pakistani army chief, proved to be decisive as the two sides agreed to explore the possibility of “military training exchanges,” a senior military official disclosed to The Express Tribune. The official said the Afghan delegation would visit military institutions as part of efforts to assess how the two neighbours could enter into an accord to strengthen military-to-military contacts. He added that that Pakistan has one of the best military training institutions in the region and this could help Afghan forces, including its officers and soldiers. A statement issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) also hinted at progress in talks over military training. The statement said the two sides discussed matters of professional interest, with particular focus on “enhancing mutual defence cooperation and measures that the Afghan National Army and Pakistan Army intend to initiate for an enduring training relationship.” Another official said that the visit is “likely to mark a new page in the history of Pak-Afghan relations.” “It is also of note that General Bismillah is a non-Pashtun, a Tajik, by origin. This vindicates the fact that Pakistan is moving ahead with the vision of a broad-based relationship with Afghanistan,” said the official. Pakistan is considered crucial for the peace process in Afghanistan because of its historic ties with Afghan insurgents, including the Taliban. The official said General Kayani told the Afghan defence minister that Pakistan would make all-out efforts for a “peaceful, stable and united Afghanistan”. Gen Kayani maintained that the release of Taliban detainees was part of Pakistan’s ‘sincere efforts’ to help the Afghan-led and Afghan-owned reconciliation process. He also assured the Afghan delegation of full support to bring normalcy to the border region, which “should have a direct and positive effect on the stability in Afghanistan so that situation could become ripe for the drawdown of Isaf forces in 2014”. The two sides also discussed the possibility of converting the existing trilateral border control mechanism into bilateral arrangement once the US-led foreign forces leave the country. In his remarks, the Afghan defence minister thanked Pakistan for releasing some important Taliban prisoners, which, he said, would help kick-off a broad-based intra-Afghan dialogue. The Afghan defence minister also called on President Asif Ali Zardari and discussed defence cooperation and the fight against extremism. President Zardari said Pakistan attached great importance to its ties with Afghanistan and added that the delegation’s visit would help further cement relations.

PRESIDENT ZARDARI: Pakistan highly values its ties with Afghanistan

Afghan Defence Minister Bismillah Khan called on President Asif Ali Zardari in Islamabad Monday and discussed matters regarding defence cooperation and war on terror.
Talking to him‚ President Zardari said Pakistan gives importance to its ties with Afghanistan. Bismillah Khan said his country wants to promote defence relations with Pakistan. Earlier, Afghan Defence Minister Bismillah Khan Mohammadi arrived here on a five-day official visit to boost counter-terrorism cooperation between the two countries, Afghan officials said Monday. Mohammadi visiting with an Afghan delegation to meet top Pakistani officials and military leaders to discuss topics of national security, including cooperation on defence from insurgents and border coordination. The six-member delegation will also visit various defence institutions. Pakistan army chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani had extended the invitation to the minister during his visit to Kabul in November last year. The officials are expected to talk about recent cross-border attacks which have been a source of tension between the two countries in recent months, as well as a "roadmap" for security that Afghanistan has already handed over to Pakistan about the future set-up after the Nato-led military forces withdrawal in 2014, they said.

Obama to tread carefully in immigration debate

President Barack Obama will wade cautiously into the debate over U.S. immigration reform on Tuesday, seeking to build momentum for a new bipartisan plan to offer a pathway to citizenship for the country's 11 million illegal immigrants. Reflecting the growing clout of Hispanic voters, Obama will travel to Nevada little more than a week after his second inauguration and make the case for swift action by Congress to overhaul immigration laws. Immigration reform could give Obama a landmark second-term legislative achievement, but he is expected to tread carefully in a speech in Las Vegas, just a day after a group of influential Senate Democrats and Republicans laid out a broad plan of their own. Obama's challenge is to help build public support for the senators' framework, which is in line with many of his main ideas for a sweeping immigration overhaul, while not alienating his fiercest Republican foes who might resist anything with the Democratic president's name on it. While Obama is likely to use the bully pulpit of the presidency, backed up by a White House-organized grass-roots campaign, he will likely be more circumspect for now about how personally involved he becomes in congressional negotiations. "The minute it becomes Obama's plan, the Republicans kick automatically into opposition," said Bill Schneider, a political scientist at George Mason University in Virginia. "The White House knows to back off for now." Scheduled to speak at a Las Vegas high school at 11:15 a.m. PST, Obama does not intend to unveil legislation of his own. He will instead urge lawmakers to press ahead with their efforts even as he restates the "blueprint" for reform he rolled out in 2011, which called for an "earned" path to citizenship, administration officials said. The flurry of activity marks the first substantive drive in years to forge an agreement on fixing America's flawed immigration system. Though the debate is likely to be contentious there is a growing consensus in Washington that the conditions are finally ripe for tackling the problem. Obama and his fellow Democrats see their commitment to immigration reform as a way to solidify their hold on the growing Latino vote, which they won handily in the 2012 election. Nevada, for example, has a fast-growing Hispanic population that helped Obama carry the state in the November election. Many Republicans, worried that their party has alienated Hispanics with anti-immigrant rhetoric, are suddenly open to cooperation on the issue as they seek to set a new tone.
DEVIL IN THE DETAILS?
The eight-member Senate group includes John McCain, a Republican from the border state of Arizona; Charles Schumer, a centrist Democrat from New York; and Republican Marco Rubio of Florida, a Cuban-American favorite of the Tea Party movement who has helped garner support from influential conservatives. Translating the aspirations expressed by the group into an inevitably lengthy and complicated bill will itself be a major challenge in Congress. At the same time, the White House wants to see further details before Obama will fully embrace the senators' approach. In an attempt to build support, the Senate proposal would couple immigration reform with enhanced border security efforts aimed at preventing illegal immigration and ensuring that those foreigners temporarily in the United States return home when their visas expire. Under the proposal, undocumented immigrants would be allowed to register with the government, pay a fine, and then be given probationary legal status allowing them to work. Ultimately, these immigrants would have to "go to the end of the line" and apply for permanent status. But while waiting to qualify for citizenship, they would no longer face the fear of deportation or harassment from law enforcers if they have steered clear of illegal activity. Obama's aides consider it a breakthrough that Republican members of the bipartisan group of senators have agreed to a path to citizenship, a concept that many in their party have long opposed as tantamount to amnesty for law-breakers. The White House remains wary, however. The president's aides have written up extensive legislative language for an immigration overhaul and will step in with their own formal proposals if the Senate effort falls apart, an administration official said. Immigration reform, sidelined by economic issues and healthcare reform during Obama's first term, is part of an ambitious liberal agenda he laid out in his second inaugural address. That agenda also includes gun control, gay rights and fighting climate change. Last summer, Obama took executive action so that the federal government stopped seeking to deport illegal immigrants who had arrived in the United States as children - a dramatic change that was celebrated in the Hispanic community. After winning the bitterly fought election, Obama promised to tackle the issue comprehensively early in his new term.

Monday, January 28, 2013

U.S: Senators push immigration plan

A bipartisan group of U.S. senators has agreed on an immigration reform plan that would provide a path to citizenship for the 11 million illegal immigrants in the United States but only after borders are better secured. The plan, unveiled a day before President Barack Obama is to give a policy speech on immigration in Nevada, tackles the most explosive issue - how to deal with the millions of foreigners living in the United States illegally. Under the group's proposal, undocumented immigrants would be allowed to register with the government, pay a fine, and then be given probationary legal status allowing them to work. Ultimately, they would have to "go to the end of the line" and apply for permanent status, according to the document by eight Senators including Republicans Marco Rubio of Florida, John McCain and Jeff Flake of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Democrats Charles Schumer of New York, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Michael Bennet of Colorado and Robert Menendez of New Jersey. The White House praised the group's efforts but warned that Obama would not be satisfied until there was meaningful reform. The president "will continue to urge Congress to act until that is achieved," a White House spokesman said. Lawmakers have scheduled a news conference for 2:30 p.m. ET. Under the plan, no one would be given more permanent legal status until new measures were implemented to stem the flow of immigrants across U.S. borders, a critical concession to conservatives and border state members of congress. The path to citizenship would also be contingent on a new enforcement measure to track the status of immigrants who may have overstayed visas, the document said. The proposal resembles previous immigration bills - including a 2007 measure that died in Congress in part because of disagreement over the timing and balance of border-enforcement measures versus granting citizenship to the millions of undocumented immigrants. But advocates noted that this time, the climate was ripe for immigration reform. "Conservatives, law enforcers and businesses are calling for immigration reform. You did not see that in 2007," said Ali Noorani, the executive director with the National Immigration Forum advocacy group. Democrats have considered future citizenship for undocumented immigrants a "bottom line" for a bill, as Schumer said Sunday at a news conference. Republicans, in turn, have tended to stress border security. While the framework released Monday includes something for all these groups, translating the four-page outline into legislation with a chance of passing is likely to prove challenging, notwithstanding the bi-partisan makeup of the group and support that came early Monday from U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
SUPPORT FROM CONSERVATIVES
Rubio's involvement has helped give the plan credibility among some Republicans. His proposals have attracted support from influential conservatives, including former vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan and TV commentator Bill O'Reilly. Last year, Rubio had a hard time getting conservatives on board for allowing "dreamers" to stay here - children of illegals, many of whom have spent most of their lives in the United States, are in the country through no fault of their own and attend U.S. schools. Rubio is a Cuban-American who is often mentioned as a presidential contender. He is a favorite of the Tea Party conservative movement. In addition to the path to citizenship, the Senators' proposal outlines three other legislative goals: retaining and attracting highly qualified workers; creating a system to prevent identity theft and the hiring of unauthorized workers: and establishing a way to bring in unskilled labor while providing them with workers rights. The immigration issue was largely pushed aside during Obama's first term as he tackled healthcare and the economy. But the president, who had overwhelming support from Hispanic voters in his 2012 re-election, cited it as part of his agenda when sworn in for a second term last week. Immigration has been among the toughest issues confronting Congress over the past two decades, in part because so many powerful interest groups have a stake in it, from business organizations in need of skilled labor to the trade union movement, which worries that a flow of immigrant labor unprotected by U.S. workplace laws could depress wages. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has made immigration reform a priority this year, expressing particular support for provisional visas for lesser-skilled workers and expansion of green cards for foreign nationals who receive advanced degrees from U.S. colleges and universities. On Monday, the Chamber praised the proposal and said it would work with all parties to get a bill passed.

Egypt clashes continue after Morsi’s ‘emergency’ announcement

Pakistan : Shias fearful as target killings reach provincial capital

The Express Tribune
As Peshawar experiences an unprecedented rise in sectarian killings with three prominent Shias targeted from January 9 to January 20, the community blame police inefficiency for the recent wave of violence. In the latest attack, a resident of Parachinar, Ashiq Hussain was targeted along with his friend near Kohat Bus Stand in the jurisdiction of Banamarhi police station. Hussain survived the attack, but sustained injuries. On January 9, Dr Riaz Hussain, the Pakistan Peoples Party president in Kurram Agency and prominent Shia leader from Parachinar, was gunned down. Later on January 20, Additional Session Judge Ihtisham Ali was attacked, leaving him critically injured. Two days later, Dr Shah Nawaz Ali was shot inside his clinic in Saddar, while on the 21st of this month, Fayaz Hussain was abducted and found dead on Ring Road. Moreover last week, a student Saqib Hussain from Parachinar and activist Haji Kamal Hussain went missing in the city mysteriously, further complicating matters. The situation has highly enraged Shias in the city who have even turned down an invitation to meet Chief Minister Amir Haider Khan Hoti to discuss the targeted attacks. Talking to The Express Tribune, Muharram Committee General Secretary Muzafar Ali Akhunzada blamed the Peshawar police for its inability to curtail the violence and said no arrests have been made so far. “Police have failed to protect us against these people who are openly engaged in sectarian violence. Shias are being targeted in crowded market places and the police are still not able to arrest anyone.” He added that due to the police’s incompetence, the attacks are increasing as terrorists are confident they will not be caught. “Our leader Sardar Sajjad refused to meet the chief minister as we believe that the administration has failed to perform its duty of protecting us,” he said. Police, on the other hand, says terrorists involved in target killings leave the city after the attacks as they are primarily based in the tribal belt of the country where the police has no jurisdiction. “Police is a law enforcement agency but it has to fight militancy, which is the real burden,” said a police official requesting anonymity. He added that that they are already preoccupied with major terrorist attacks. Last year in November, SP Hilal Haider was killed in a suicide attack in the historic Qissakhwani bazaar. He belonged to the famous Qizalbash family.

Washington values democratic system in Pakistan

US Ambassador to Pakistan‚ Richard Olson has said that his country does not support any specific individual or political party. Talking to newsmen here on Monday‚ he said Washington values democratic system in Pakistan and wants free and fair elections. He said his country will accept results of general elections as strengthening of democracy and the state institutions in Pakistan is the need of hour. The US Ambassador said holding of meetings with politicians and businessmen is a routine

Pakistan to get US surveillance plane this year

http://www.nydailynews.com/
Pakistan is expected to receive maritime surveillance P3C Orion aircraft from the US this year, state media quoted the country's ambassador in Washington as saying. Sherry Rehman, who has been meeting with top American officials as part of efforts to restore the full range of bilateral ties, has said both the civil and defence cooperation between the two sides are gaining momentum, reported Xinhua Monday citing Radio Pakistan. Pakistan's Vice Chief of the Naval Staff Vice Admiral Muhammad Shafique, currently on a visit to the US, discussed matters related to ongoing cooperation between Pakistani and American navies and expressed satisfaction over senior level exchanges. Pakistan signed an agreement with the American defence manufacturer Lockheed Martin seven years ago, for the delivery of seven Orion aircrafts. The navy received three of these aircrafts in 2010, while two more were delivered in 2011. In addition to the Orions, the navy is also operating seven aging Fokker F27-200 Friendship naval surveillance aircrafts, which it had acquired during the 1980s. The Orions are one of the most popular maritime surveillance aircrafts in the world, being used by the naval forces in a number of nations such as the US, Japan, New Zealand and Brazil. The aircraft were first inducted into the US Navy in 1962, and so far more than 750 units have been manufactured. The US Navy recently decided to replace its Orion fleet with the Boeing P-8A Poseidons. The Pakistani ambassador said that Pakistan-US interactions are important to push forward bilateral defense ties and said the Pakistan Navy's key role in securing sea lanes in North Arabian Sea as part of the anti-piracy international coalition has been widely appreciated in the US.

India, Pakistan and unveiled threats

Daily Times
In an unsettling display of muscle flexing, neighbouring India recently paraded its newest long range nuclear missile Agni V that reportedly can hit anywhere in China and even as far off as some areas in Europe. The occasion was India’s Republic Day and it was marked by a barely diplomatic choice of words when Indian President Pranab Mukherjee stated that India was ready to extend the hand of friendship to Pakistan but that the friendship should not be “taken for granted”. That the president, who holds an extremely important position of responsibility, especially when it comes to India’s relationship with Pakistan, should speak so harshly and hastily after the recent hostilities at the Line of Control (LoC) is surprising. A spate of deadly attacks has taken place at the LoC where Pakistan claims that three of its soldiers were killed by Indian army men followed by counter-allegations by India that Pakistani soldiers killed two of theirs, brutally beheading one of them. Both sides have refuted these claims. Both countries seem to be at a communications standoff with India’s latest extensions of friendship being offered but without any real commitment to the cause. It is also extremely alarming that the Indian president decided to use such deliberately scorching words on the day his country was exhibiting a mighty nuclear weapon — intimidation or threat? This particular statement highlights the growing concern about the nuclear arms race in the region, especially between two neighbours as bitterly divided in the past as Pakistan and India. The peace process that the two countries laboured so meticulously over after a tense silence following the Mumbai attacks in 2008 is an effort that must be nurtured and seen through. Just getting both countries to the table, willing to approach their respective issues with ears and minds open is achievement enough. Seeing it through is the real challenge. And it is this challenge that many of the detractors of the peace process wish to sabotage in any way possible. It is pertinent that the authorities, whether diplomatic or military, on both sides of the border understand this fact. It is vital that the Indian authorities look into the possibility that non-state actors may have carried out the attack on their soldiers. The Pakistan army is not known for such acts of mutilation. Funnily enough, some segments of the Indian media have pointed out that the Indian army, in fact, resorts to such brutalities at times by decapitating and piking the heads of our soldiers. It is with this backstory that one realises how the Indian authorities hardly have the moral high ground to issue such visible threats to Pakistan. Those who have a stake in the peace process and composite dialogue between India and Pakistan must understand that maturity, humility and a real commitment to preserving the delicate balance needs to exist if non-state actors are to be defeated. A bilateral settlement between both sides must be initiated instead of the blame game that is being touted. Now is not the time to whip up war clouds because, if real, effective communication is not established, then the bigger picture is lost. India and Pakistan are in dire need of effective statesmanship and restraint otherwise the fragile peace will not take too long to dissolve.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Hillary Clinton hailed as great secretary of state by Barack Obama

Hillary Clinton has been hailed as one of America's great secretaries of state by President Barack Obama, who said he was "going to miss" his former political rival after she stepped down next week.
Mr Obama used his first – and probably last – joint interview with Mrs Clinton, as an opportunity "to publicly say thank you" for her four years of exhausting work as America's most senior diplomat. "I think Hillary will go down as one of the finest secretaries of state we've had," said Mr Obama, who added: "I want the country to appreciate just what an extraordinary role she's played". The president said that the pair had created "a great collaboration" since she accepted a place in his Cabinet following her defeat to Mr Obama in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary contest. "I'm going to miss her," he told CBS. "I wish she was sticking around. But she has logged in so many miles that I can't begrudge her wanting to take it easy for a little bit". Mrs Clinton, who is expected to be replaced by Senator John Kerry, conceded that their partnership was "improbable" after the bruising primary campaign, which featured furious rows between their camps.She even suggested that she had developed a routine answer for sceptical foreign officials to "help them understand" how the two could work together effectively after such a bitter rivalry. "I say, 'look: in politics and in democracy, sometimes you win elections and sometimes you lose elections. And I worked very hard, but I lost. And then President Obama asked me to be secretary of state and I said yes'. And why did he ask me, and why did I say yes? Because we both love our country".

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Malala inspired children worldwide: UN campaigners

The bravery of Malala Yousafzai has inspired children around the world to fight for a better education, key figures in a UN campaign said on Friday. Hosting a discussion at the World Economic Forum in Davos, UN special education envoy and former British prime minister Gordon Brown paid tribute to 15-year-old Malala, who was gunned down in Swat in October.
“We saw when Malala Yousafzai was shot in Pakistan, girls in Pakistan went on to the streets to protest that they too wanted the education they were being denied,” Brown told an elite audience at the luxury ski resort. Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt, who is also involved in UN education efforts, said Malala’s example showed the need for the international community to help “vulnerable states.” “Her story has affected us all, it has affected teenagers all over the world, my own teenage daughters are thinking about this and worrying about girls’ education,” she said. “And that’s why this ownership (of the issue) is so important: some girls don’t get education because their country is at war and a weak state and a very poor country. “But some kids, especially girls, don’t get their education because of cultural, religious choices in their part of the world.” The Danish premier said all countries should take the responsibility for providing a good basic education where possible, but where failed states were unable to, then the world must help instead. “Those examples where girls are allowed into schools, where we help in vulnerable states like Afghanistan, that’s where we can make a difference,” Thorning-Schmidt said. UN chief Ban Ki-moon, who appointed Brown last July to lead a campaign to get 61 million more children into school by 2015, opened the discussion by saying that the world “cannot afford a lost generation”. “Education must be a top priority of global and development agendas – this is not an option it is an imperative,” he told the audience of global politicians and business leaders. Malala was shot on her school bus by Taliban gunmen for the “crime” of promoting girls’ education, but survived the murder attempt. Malala first rose to prominence aged just 11 with a blog for the BBC Urdu service in 2009 in which she described life in Swat during the bloody rule of the Taliban. She is still recovering from her injuries at a hospital in Britain. Brown has pushed Malala’s case and in November visited Pakistan to present a million-signature petition to the government calling for change.

Pakistan: Measles and Weasels

By HUMA YUSUF
Pakistan is currently threatened by a measles epidemic. According to the World Health Organization, 103 children have died from pneumonia and other measles-related complications between Jan. 1 and 19. In Sindh, the worst-hit province, 66 deaths have been recorded this month; in Baluchistan, 33. In Punjab, Pakistan's most populous and politically influential province, the toll is only up to nine. Yet in addition to sparking fears of a health crisis, these deaths are already raising questions about the electoral prospects of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), which forms the government of Punjab and, on the national level, is the leading opposition party to the Pakistan Peoples Party, or P.P.P. With a general election just months away, the leaders of Punjab don't want to be accused of failing to provide health care - again. And so even as the Punjabi government has played down the risks of a measles epidemic, Shahbaz Sharif, a PML-N leader who is both Punjab's chief minister and the head of the province's health ministry, has promptly taken action to prevent the spread of the disease. The provincial government has launched a public-awareness campaign, stocked up on vaccines, lowered the recommended age for inoculating children and tasked local officials with monitoring outbreaks. Sharif isn't taking any chances. In late November, the adviser to the prime minister on human rights called for Sharif's resignation on the grounds that, "No one in the Punjab government has taken responsibility of the utter failure and lack of governance, especially in the health sector." This criticism stems partly from political opportunism: The adviser is allied with the P.P.P., which is expecting fierce competition from the PML-N at election time. But it also is deserved. Late last year more than 40 people across Punjab died after consuming a toxic cough syrup produced locally. In early 2012, scores of patients died after being prescribed contaminated heart medication at the Punjab Institute of Cardiology, a provincial government facility in Lahore. The previous year an epidemic of dengue fever killed 247 people. Meanwhile, the Health Department of Punjab has been embroiled in a labor dispute with the Young Doctors' Association, resulting in major doctors' strikes. Not surprisingly, the PML-N's rivals regularly cite these failings as proof of the party's inability to govern. Also not surprisingly, Sharif doesn't want his handling of the current measles outbreak to become one more item on their list. And so he is trying to replicate his one big success of last year, when his department managed to curb a dengue fever epidemic: The number of reported cases fell from 21,000 in 2011 to approximately 250 in 2012. Of course, Sharif's swift action against the spread of measles doesn't amount to a serious effort to revamp Punjab's collapsing health sector. The patients are just lucky that what's good for the politicians happens to be good for them, too.

Pakistan - a failed state on a tinderbox

BY:Joel Brinkley
Distracted by the deadly violence in Mali and Algeria, no one seems to be paying adequate attention to the tragicomedy under way in Pakistan. This matters because events of the last several weeks demonstrate without equivocation that Pakistan is an utterly failed state - but one that possesses nuclear weapons. The country is tumbling down the abyss. Where else could a fundamentalist Muslim cleric who lives in Canada draw tens of thousands of fans to a rally calling for dissolution of the government - speaking from inside a shipping container with a bulletproof window? That's just one in a litany of absurdities going on there. At the same time comes the latest round of unresolvable acrimony between President Asif Ali Zardari and the country's Supreme Court, which has been trying to bring him down for years. Two years ago, the court ordered the prime minister of the time, Yousaf Raza Gilani, to open a corruption investigation against Zardari - as if Pakistanis didn't already know that Zardari, like most every government official, was thoroughly corrupt. After all, since the time his wife, the late Benazir Bhutto, was prime minister, Zardari has been known as "Mr. Ten Percent" for the money he purloined from every business deal he managed. The court ordered Gilani to ask Swiss officials for documentation of Zardari's in-absentia conviction on money-laundering charges 10 years ago. Gilani refused, noting that the president is supposed to be immune from prosecution. The court scoffed. One justice spat: "Obedience to the command of a court" is "not a game of chess or a game of hide-and-seek." And soon after, the court forced Gilani to resign. Raja Pervaiz Ashraf, the information technology minister, took his place. Right away, the court landed on him with the same request: Help us file corruption charges against Zardari; get those Swiss documents. The new prime minister also resisted, and wouldn't you know it: Right now the court is trying to force him out of office - charging him with corruption. It's almost comical. But all of this seems to have paralyzed an already ineffective, incompetent government. Just a few days ago, an officer in the state anticorruption agency who was investigating the allegations against Ashraf was found hanged in his barracks. Police called it a suicide. Awfully convenient timing. At the same time, in northwestern Pakistan, thousands of protesters shouting antigovernment slogans put the bodies of 15 villagers on display, charging that security forces had shot them dead in their homes. The chief security agency, the shadowy, mendacious Inter-Services Intelligence, did not comment but finally did respond to a court inquiry into the fate of seven men who were arrested in 2007. A court ordered them released. But then, all seven men simply disappeared. Finally, on Monday, an ISI lawyer acknowledged the "lack of incriminating evidence" against the seven men but went on to say that they were arrested "on moral grounds." Supreme Court Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry shot back that the ISI simply cannot detain suspects indefinitely and unlawfully - particularly on "moral grounds." "Morally, they can put anyone behind bars, even me," Chaudhry charged. "According to them, all the people are guilty." But despite years of heinous abuses, neither the court nor anyone else in government ever tries to rein in the renegade spy agency. Why should we care about any of this? After all, Pakistan is hardly the only failed state in the world. Think about Somalia, Sudan, Haiti, Zimbabwe. But have any of these other states received more than $12 billion in aid from Washington over the past decade - with another $688 million payment now before Congress awaiting almost certain approval? And do any of the other failed states - Afghanistan, Chad, Nigeria, Uganda - possess nuclear weapons? No. Pakistan is the only state that has bombs - and a vibrant Islamic insurgency intent on toppling the absurdly ineffectual government. And don't forget that senior leaders of al Qaeda live there, too, most of them resident in Pakistan's eastern borderlands. Of course, Osama bin Laden also resided there, undisturbed until U.S. forces killed him in 2011. If the Taliban do ever succeed in toppling the government, they would almost certainly seize the nukes - a terrifying prospect. Right now, though, Taliban militants, responsible for manifest mayhem and thousands of deaths in recent times, appear to be sitting back and watching, most probably with smiles on their faces. Their goal is to destabilize the state, but it's quite obvious now that the sitting government is much better at that than they are.

Court rules Obama's appointments unconstitutional

A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that President Barack Obama violated the U.S. Constitution when he used recess appointments to fill a labor board, in a sweeping decision that could limit presidential power to push through federal nominees. The court found that the Senate was not truly in recess, for the purpose of a recess appointment, when Obama in January 2012 installed three nominees to the National Labor Relations Board. The nominees were facing stiff Republican opposition, and the appointments caused an uproar at the time. Republicans argued that Obama undercut the Senate's power to confirm nominees because although most of its members were out of town, the Senate had not formally adjourned. In a surprisingly broad ruling, the three-judge panel rejected not only the NLRB appointments but any made while the Senate is in session but on a break. That could limit recess appointments to only a few weeks a year. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit also ruled that recess appointments could only be used for positions that become vacant while the Senate is in recess. "If the decision stands, it would be a significant reduction of the president's recess power," said John Elwood, a Washington lawyer who was deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel from 2005 through 2009. "This is a big, big decision for executive power," Elwood said. "It is one of the most important decisions in decades." More immediately, the ruling casts doubt on the ability of the NLRB, an independent agency that oversees labor disputes, to conduct its business if it does not have enough members. Its recent rulings may also be vulnerable to challenge. The ruling also throws into question the legality of the appointment of Richard Cordray, the head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Obama used the same type of recess appointment to install Cordray; his appointment was challenged in a separate lawsuit. But the ruling's most profound impact may be its threat to the now-standard practice of presidents ramming through nominees that otherwise would get bogged down in the Senate, often because of unrelated political fights. White House spokesman Jay Carney called the ruling "novel and unprecedented" and said it contradicted 150 years of practice by both Democratic and Republican administrations. The Justice Department said it is considering its options to appeal. Legal experts expect the administration will challenge the ruling, and the case could go to the Supreme Court. Republican lawmakers, who had joined the legal challenge to the NLRB appointments, jumped on the ruling as a vindication of their view that the administration had overreached. "The D.C. Circuit Court today reaffirmed that the Constitution is not an inconvenience but the law of the land," Mitch McConnell, the top Republican in the Senate, said in a statement. NLRB Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce said in a statement the board would continue to perform its statutory duties and issue decisions. CFPB spokeswoman Moira Vahey said the ruling had no direct effect on the bureau. A TEST OF POWERS The suit started as a routine dispute between soda bottling company Noel Canning and the labor board, but developed into a high-profile appeal with the help of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Senate Republicans. The case was seen as a test of the president's ability to bypass a Senate vote on nominees. The Constitution allows the Senate to block nominees, and both Democratic and Republican presidents have used recess appointments as a way around this for decades. When Obama made the NLRB appointments, the Senate was not officially in recess. It continued to meet every few days for minutes at a time with few senators present. The court's decision, issued by a panel of judges who had been appointed by Republicans, hinged on what constitutes a "recess" and whether it includes short breaks while the Senate is still technically in session. Presidents have often used these intra-session recess appointments. Ronald Reagan, for example, made 36 such appointments, and Bill Clinton made 39, according to data from the Congressional Research Service. "Considering the text, history, and structure of the Constitution, these appointments were invalid from their inception," the ruling said about the NLRB appointments of Sharon Block, Richard Griffin and Terence Flynn. It said the president could not have "free rein to appoint his desired nominees at any time he pleases, whether that time be a weekend, lunch, or even when the Senate is in session and he is merely displeased with its inaction. This cannot be the law." Jay Wexler, a law professor at Boston University School of Law, said the ruling includes "pretty big restrictions" but that he was most surprised that presidents would only be allowed to use such appointments when a vacancy popped up during a recess. Once rare, recess appointments became more common in the late 1970s as a way to bypass the confirmation process, which senators have used increasingly to block nominees. Recent presidents pushed the boundaries. George W. Bush took the unusual step of filling a judgeship during a recess. For a graphic on recess appointments by past presidents, please see link.reuters.com/vyj55t. Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy previously challenged the intra-session recess appointment of William Pryor to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2004 by George W. Bush. The 11th Circuit upheld the right of the president to make the recess appointment, finding the term "recess" in the Constitution ambiguous. That decision conflicts with the D.C. Circuit's decision on Friday. NLRB, CORDRAY IN DOUBT Pearce of the NLRB said the ruling would not deter the board from getting on with its work. However, the NLRB's recent and future decisions are now on legally shaky ground because without the three appointments, the board lacks a quorum. The NLRB has been active this past year in expanding protections for employees who complain about their employer on social media like Facebook or Twitter. It also issued a ruling requiring employers to continue collecting union dues even after a union contract expires. Donna Ballman, an employment lawyer and author of "Stand Up For Yourself Without Getting Fired," said the appeals court decision would lead to delays in NLRB rulings. Although Friday's decision did not touch on Cordray, his appointment to the CFPB was challenged in a separate lawsuit brought in June by the State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, and other institutions. That suit presented a similar argument that the recess appointment was invalid because the Senate was technically still in session. Cordray's appointment followed months of rancorous debate over the new consumer bureau, which was created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial oversight law to police markets for products such as credit cards and home loans. Obama on Thursday renominated Cordray to head the CFPB, but it is unclear how long the confirmation process will take. Even though the new ruling doesn't deal with the consumer agency, it could call into question supervisory actions and regulations it has taken. "The CFPB world has been turned upside down," said financial services lawyer Richard Gottlieb of the Dykema law firm.

Friday, January 25, 2013

Don't take for granted the hand of friendship, President Pranab Mukherjee tells Pakistan

Sponsorship of terrorism through non-state actors is a matter of deep concern, President Pranab Mukherjee said today making it clear to Pakistan that India is ready to offer a hand of friendship but that should not be taken for granted. In his address to the nation on the eve of 64th Republic Day, he said in the recent past, serious atrocities on the Line of Control on Indian troops have been seen, an apparent reference to the beheading of an Indian soldier by Pakistan Army. "Neighbours may have disagreements; tension can be a subtext of frontiers. But sponsorship of terrorism through non-state actors is a matter of deep concern to the entire nation," he said. He said India believes in peace on the border and is always ready to offer a hand in the hope of friendship. "But this hand should not be taken for granted," he said.

Allies in Libya, Enemies in Mali

By: Ali Hashem for Al-Monitor
Thanks to French President Francois Hollande, who felt the need to step in to contain the collapse of Mali, and a calamitous rescue operation by Algerian forces that resulted in the deaths of 37 hostages, the Western media has discovered Mali. The largest West African country is under threat of division in a war that sees government troops, along with a Western coalition led by the French, battling well-armed ethnic Tuaregs and the al-Qaeda-affiliated Ansaruldin group, who were already at war with each other. Once known as French Sudan, Mali is one of France's main allies in sub-Saharan Africa. Fears are growing in Paris that the chaos might spill out to neighboring states fom what was anciently called "French West Africa," drastically affecting regional and international stability and peace. But that’s not all. France is concerned the spread will put what remains of its influence in this part of the world under serious threat. The war in Mali, many believe, wasn’t entirely unpredictable for those keeping a close eye on the situation. There were strong indicators, such as weaponry and fighters crossing the loose borders. The country was forced to face the ambitions of well-armed ethnic Tuareg fighters, who returned home after the fall of Moammar Gadhafi’s regime in Libya. Tuaregs revived their 100-year-old dream of an independent state in the Azawad territory to the north of Mali. They took advantage of a coup d'état that ousted President Amado Toumani Toure to control their area and declare independence with the help of an al-Qaeda-affiliated group. The latter were looking for a safe haven in a hostile environment, especially amid the end of the Libyan war. The Islamists, later on, overthrew the Tuaregs and installed Shariah law in the area, a move some sources suggest was prompted by post-revolution Libya, whose leaders were keen to uproot any pro-Gadhafi sentiments near their borders. Post-revolution Libya is perhaps the most critical factor in the struggle for Mali; the fall of Gaddafi and the links the Ansaruldin have with the new rulers of Tripoli gave this war a different perspective. It is as if Mali were the arena where another version of the Libyan war resumed, though with different objectives. Less than two years ago, NATO strikes helped the rebellion in Libya and paved the way for the opposition to end 40 years of Gadhafi rule. At that time foreign intervention was welcomed by Libyans, and not much opposed by Arabs and Muslims. This was in stark contrast with the reaction to foreign intervention in Iraq in 2003. While in Libya, I had the chance to meet Abdulmonem Al Mukhtar, once a member of the Islamic Libyan fighting group, who was killed just weeks after we met in April 2011. Al Mukhtar fought against the Americans in Afghanistan and returned to Libya on March 2011 along with 100 of his loyal fighters to take part in the war. Near Ajdabiya, to the east of Libya, I asked how he could be an enemy of NATO in Afghanistan and an ally in Libya. He laughed, told me not to be a “fanatic" and added, "In Afghanistan, they are an occupation force. Here, they are helping us topple the dictator." It wasn’t only Abdulmonem who approached the situation this way. Everyday people gave similar answers, and mainstream media organizations weren’t far behind in that logic. There was a common belief that in a war for liberation, all means were justifiable. Later on some of the Syrians revolting against President Bashar al-Assad started demanding foreign intervention to help them defeat the regime, and so did those who supported them around the Arab and Muslim world. People initially welcomed foreign intervention — at least, until they contemplated it further. As a result of the Libyan war, a new war started in the region. Once again, the tables are turned. Yesterday’s allies in Libya are today’s enemies in Mali. Voices refusing foreign intervention became louder and louder, calling on the West, specifically France, to respect the sovereignty of the sub-Saharan state. Some dubbed the military intervention a new crusade, while the presidents of Egypt and Tunisia and the prime minister of Libya all warned the intervention will fuel conflict in the region. Many didn’t realize that a war in Mali had surfaced until news of foreign intervention made headlines. Some are starting to raise questions about the consequences of foreign military intervention, and the forces it will unleash. The Libyan “success” preceded the terrorist attack on the US consulate in Ben Ghazi, which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, and now we have Mali. It is not that the war in Mali started only now; it's only now that the world started thinking of its consequences.

Rallies mark anniversary of Egypt uprising

Egyptians have returned to the streets to mark the second anniversary of the uprising that toppled Hosni Mubarak, the former president. Hundreds took to the capital's now iconic Tahrir Square on Friday morning, where youths protesting against the government clashed with Cairo police. The ministry of health said 16 people were wounded in the violence.

Bahraini forces fire tear gas at anti-regime protesters in Manama

Saudi-backed Bahraini forces have fired tear gas to disperse anti-regime demonstrators, who took to the streets in the capital, Manama, in defiance of a regime ban on protests

Bleak 2013 humanitarian outlook for Afghanistan

More violence and a worsening humanitarian situation are likely in Afghanistan in 2013, say aid agencies. “The worsening conflict trends over the last five years indicate that civilians will continue to suffer because of armed violence and that the humanitarian situation will deteriorate,” says the new Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP) for 2013, published by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). The report brings together the major humanitarian challenges facing the country in 2013, a year that will see the continued withdrawal of international forces: Afghan security forces will take control of three-quarters of the country by June. Afghanistan has some of the worst humanitarian indicators in the world - 34 percent of the population are food insecure and 10 percent of children die before they start primary school. With many Afghans lacking access to rudimentary government services like basic education, water, primary health services and housing, the humanitarian community is requesting US$471 million to cover the cost of projects in 2013. Many analysts think the steady withdrawal of international forces in 2013, ahead of full withdrawal in 2014, will lead to an upsurge in violence as anti-government forces capitalize on their stronger position vis-à-vis national security forces. The strength of these national forces is disputed. Some analysts saw “significant improvements within the Afghan military” in 2012, while the CHAP points to high levels of desertion and low levels of re-enlistment, meaning that a third of the Afghan force needs replacing each year. While civilian deaths and injuries declined by 4 percent in the first 10 months of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011, according to the UN Assistant Mission to Afghanistan (UNAMA), targeted attacks on civilians by anti-government forces increased by 53 percent in the first half of 2012, and overall, violence in 2012 has spread increasingly beyond southern and eastern areas. Over the last few years the space for humanitarian work has reduced, especially as anti-government forces have radicalized and fragmented: aid workers say air transport is frequently the only safe way to reach remote areas. However, the international pullout may also provide opportunities for more independent aid work and greater differentiation from the Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs), which operate closely with the government and military. Aid groups increasingly have to work in areas where the Taliban and other non-government actors operate, making perceived neutrality crucial. Many international organizations opt to manage projects from Kabul and work through local NGOs, says a recent report by the Overseas Development Institute. “The privileged humanitarian access enjoyed by national NGOs should be more fully exploited,” Suzanne Murray-Jones, senior adviser with the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) in Afghanistan, told IRIN, saying that they often need capacity-building and adequate funding to do the job. To ensure that humanitarian work is carried out in the provinces with the greatest need, the 2013 CHAP plan introduces a ranking of provinces by assessed humanitarian need, to avoid aid being directed at areas that are either easy to reach or politically important.
Natural disasters
If humanitarian challenges in 2013 were limited to conflict, they would be serious enough. But Afghanistan is also frequently a victim of natural disasters, which on average affect around a quarter of a million Afghans each year. Harsh winters, deadly avalanches, earthquakes, landslides, droughts and floods leave nearly half of Afghanistan’s districts hazard-prone. The last 12 months saw a good wheat harvest but with droughts in eight out of the last 11 years, a poor harvest looks probable in the coming year, according to the CHAP 2013 report. Oxfam’s Afghanistan associate country director Kate O'Rourke says years of conflict have worn down people’s coping mechanisms: “Investing in projects designed to reduce the impact of disasters and improve people's resilience and their ability to deal with crises when they do occur is key. Only then will Afghans who are at risk be better prepared and able to cope, instead of being affected by reoccurring humanitarian `spot fires' that they are constantly trying to recover from, as they are now."
Economic pressure
Economic growth has been around 7 percent over the last few years, but opportunities remain few and the private sector is hamstrung by the lack of a reliable electricity supply. While large mining projects are being planned, the aid effort and the tens of thousands of international troops that make up a key part of the economy are set to reduce in size in the coming years. “Afghanistan is entering a very challenging period that will likely be characterized by growing economic vulnerability resulting from a reduction in international assistance and the pullout of most international forces that is expected to translate into significant economic contraction and job losses,” said Mark Bowden, the humanitarian coordinator for Afghanistan. Afghanistan is the world’s most aid-dependent country, with aid worth around $15.7 billion per year, roughly the same as the national GDP. The World Bank estimates that 6-10 percent of the population have worked in aid-financed employment.
Displacement
Four decades of conflict in Afghanistan have been one of the key drivers of displacement, creating substantial refugee populations requiring support. Around 2.7 million Afghans live in Pakistan and Iran, while within the country, 450,000 people are displaced; 34 percent of them newly displaced in the first three-quarters of 2012. Meanwhile, UNHCR say nearly six million refugees have returned to Afghanistan in the last decade, something that has put considerable pressure on the economy and services. “Many are being perceived as not having reached parity with other members of the communities in which they are living, and there is a possibility of additional unplanned, large-scale return,” said Murray-Jones at UNHCR.
Funding
To manage these needs in 2013, the humanitarian community is requesting $471 million, an increase on 2012 when the Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) was $448 million. In a sign of donor fatigue and the pressure on leading donor country budgets due to the global economic slowdown, humanitarian funding dropped by around half in 2012. Afghanistan was the fourth-least funded humanitarian crisis, as a percentage, among the 22 global appeals, although at least $270 million in aid is provided annually outside the CAP funding mechanism.

Lahore: Measles outbreak: 10-year-old dies, 22 new cases reported

The Express Tribune
A 10-year-old died of measles at Mayo Hospital’s paediatric ward on Wednesday, doctors said, becoming the first casualty of the disease in the city. Muhammad Wasif was brought to the hospital on Tuesday night and had developed pneumonia. Another 10 children with measles were also admitted to Mayo Hospital. “They are being kept in isolation as measles is a droplet infection, meaning it is highly contagious. If a kid with measles is kept in the ward with other kids, there is a 90 per cent chance all of them will catch measles,” said a doctor at the paediatric ward. “We may also face problems in accommodating all the kids in isolation due to space issues.” A Health Department official said that 12 children infected with measles had been admitted to other public hospitals in Lahore, taking the total number of known cases in the city to 92. Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif on Wednesday expressed concern about the rising number of measles cases and directed the Health Department to prepare an emergency plan within two days for the prevention of measles. He directed officials to make sure that the anti-measles vaccine is available in the province and to launch a public awareness campaign regarding preventive measures. Children in the affected areas must be vaccinated, he said at a meeting with Health Department officials. Special Assistant on Health Khawaja Salman Rafique, the Planning and Development chairman, the Health, Law, Prosecution and Home secretaries, the acting inspector general of police, the Lahore commissioner, the Gujranwala commissioner, the Lahore DCO, the Health director general, the director general of the Forensic Science Laboratory and Dr Faisal Masood also attended the meeting. Multan and Gujranwala Forty cases of measles have been reported in Multan, and three children are currently under treatment, but there have been no deaths from the disease, according to EDO (Health) Dr Munawar. He said vaccination teams had been set up to inoculate children in affected areas. He said that the disease had arrived in the district from Sindh, where some 200 children are thought to have died in a recent outbreak. Six new measles patients were reported in Gujranwala on Wednesday. Health officials said the children were being treated at Civil Hospital. Health Director General Dr Nisar Cheema said the number of measles patients being reported in the Punjab was far less than Sindh, and the outbreak had not yet become an epidemic in the province. He said that more cases of measles had been reported in the Punjab in previous years than in this year so far.

Will Karachi be saved?

Chances of Karachi being once again the city of lights are getting dimmer with every passing day as at least one dozen and a half residents are being daily subjected to target killing. It seems as if Karachi is an open field for armed bandits on an indiscriminate killing spree. The Sindh metropolis was handed over to the Rangers after the police had miserably failed to control the situation prevailing for well over five years. The leadership of three coalition partners, the PPP, MQM and ANP has long been indulging in the blame game but has failed to take effective action against those responsible for the crime of bloodletting. On Wednesday, Federal Minister and leader of Sindh PPP Maula Bux Chandio openly admitted that if action was initiated against armed gangsters, government allies got offended. Hitting back at Chandio’s statement ANP leader Shahi Syed said that if talks could be held with the Taliban and India, why the same process could not be followed with MQM on target killing in Karachi. MQM’s Nasreen Jalil responding to this said it was an irony of fate that despite being in the government, they had to lift the dead bodies of their workers. BNP Senator Hasil Bizenjo said there were no go-areas in Karachi which are dens of armed bandits. Keeping these statements in mind, it is hard to imagine that Karachi could be the city of lights again, but given the will nothing is impossible.

Pakistan: The measles and polio menace

DAILY TIMES
Disturbing news concerning the state of our collective health and disease prevention efforts are rife these days from Sindh to Punjab to FATA, and even in foreign climes. The rampant measles outbreak that has afflicted the Sukkur region of Sindh has left some 500 people dead in the last two months, most of them children. The virus has taken on terrifying proportions. It is highly contagious because it is spread from person to person through the air via infectious droplets — leaving a trail of sick and dying children with no hope in sight. The virus does not show any signs of slowing down. In fact, it is tearing through provincial boundaries showing up in all the other provinces, including far flung North Waziristan where some five children have already died and 20 more have been infected in less than a week. This situation is deplorable; helpless children are being struck down by this sickness and the government seems equally as helpless in helping these innocent souls. The high numbers, which speak of an epidemic in the making, have nudged the Ministry of Inter-provincial Coordination to establish a nationwide vaccination programme to counter the fast paced spread of measles. This is too little too late. Disease is no respecter of provincial and national boundaries. The lacklustre way the authorities have been managing the emerging crisis has been disastrous. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has already categorised Pakistan as a country that must be monitored, given the catastrophe of our anti-polio drive. WHO has given Pakistan an ultimatum: counter polio by September 2013 or be quarantined with a ban enforced on international travel. Speaking of polio, two cases of the disease have been reported in Egypt with it being found that this particular polio strain crossed over from Pakistan. This has prompted the Egyptian authorities to start an anti-polio drive in Cairo. It has also made it mandatory for all children travelling from Pakistan to be immunised at the airport before entering Egypt. We should be ashamed of ourselves; we have left our children to rot and foreign lands are apprehensive of letting our citizens enter their country. The government has to tackle this issue on a war footing. It is essential that a medical emergency be declared across Pakistan with inter-provincial coordination taking precedence over anything else. It is not enough now for provincial governments alone or singly to tackle these emerging health problems but for all levels of government, including the federal authorities, to counter this looming catastrophe.