Saturday, August 17, 2019

The failure of Imran Khan comes as no surprise

By Sushant Saree

From administrative and governance issues to a collapsing economy, Pakistan under Khan is in shambles.
More than nine months after Imran Khan, the great hope of the well-heeled “Khanistas” (the Pakistani version of Bhakts), was manoeuvred into the office by the “khakis”, the dream is starting to unravel. Except for his most die-hard supporters, no one had really expected Imran Khan to work miracles and turn Pakistan around. But hardly anyone except his most inveterate critics and perhaps the perpetual cynics had expected the sort of feckless governance and complete drift in the affairs of state that is on display. Forget about starting to fix things, the Imran Khan-led regime has not even been able to set a clear-cut direction, much less a course of action to pull the country out of the morass in which it finds itself.
During his time in the Opposition, Imran Khan had built a cult following with his rabble rousing. He had managed to convince his hard-core supporters that he was the messiah who would deliver Pakistan from the venal and vile politicians. It was not just the youth (mostly middle and upper middle class) but also most of the uniformed services which identified with him and believed that he would transform Pakistan. In fact, the Pakistani armed forces rooted for him to a point where they actually paved the way for his ascent to power by fixing the match and tilting the field in his favour.
While Imran Khan remains Teflon-coated for the Khanistas, it is now clear to most other people that Imran Khan was mostly hot air—a real “feku”. He still says all the right things but has no idea on how to implement the tall promises he had made and continues to make. It is almost as though he is living in an alternate reality, or perhaps is in stupor, that makes him take flights of fancy. At a time when the economy is broke, development expenditure has been cut drastically, growth is falling alarmingly, debt servicing and defence alone have surpassed the entire revenue of the federal government, Imran Khan like a potentate of yore goes about announcing fancy packages: a PKR 100 billion here, another PKR 150 billion there, a poverty alleviation scheme of PKR 80 billion (even 10 times the amount wouldn’t be enough) which will bring prosperity, a hare-brained housing programme to construct five million houses, and so on and so forth.
None of this is surprising to anyone who has watched Imran Khan when he was in Opposition. He was a one trick pony then—raved and ranted about corruption—and remains a one trick pony now. Except that even that one trick is only a trick because half his Cabinet is stacked with people who are steeped in the corrupt and venal ways of Purana Pakistan. The thing is that Imran Khan was and is a man of limited intelligence with no administrative experience or knowledge (unless of course you consider leading an 11-man cricket team as being enough to run a country of 210 million people).
The only thing Imran Khan had was his clipped and correct upper-crust English accent. In a country where the ISPR spokesman and the top most spin doctor tweets of the “bondage” between the people and the military, someone like Imran stands out as a genius because he speaks good English. Other than his accent, Imran Khan was the sort of guy who regurgitates the last thing that he reads in the papers, or sees on TV, or even what someone whispers in his ear.  He doesn’t have the intellectual bandwidth to apply his mind or even consider the ridiculousness of what he so nonchalantly says in public. Simply put, Imran Khan is a prime example of a disastrous cocktail of arrogance and ignorance, which makes him both abusive and abrasive.
As if his administrative and governance failures were not glaring enough—despite his complete control over his party and his claims of enjoying total support of the army—Imran Khan is so insecure that he has appointed two complete non-entities and utterly incompetent men as chief minister in two crucial provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab and is trying to run the administration in both these provinces by remote control. His inability to even forge an understanding, much less a consensus, on issues critical to those who “selected” him as Prime Minister are now fraying the strings that control him. He has bad-mouthed and needlessly hounded all his opponents to a point where getting the opposition on board for legislation on the military courts, finance commission and even the anti-terrorism stand is now looking impossible.
The economy is collapsing. Growth is likely to fall from around 5.2 per cent to anything between 3-3.5 per cent which given a population growth of 2.4 per cent means virtually no increase in incomes. Interest rates have gone through the roof and are likely to rise further. This has made doing business unviable because already businesses are borrowing money only to stay afloat. The massive depreciation of the currency—it is feared that the PKR might fall to as much as 180 to a dollar in the coming months—has made imports expensive leading to rise in inflation (highest in five years and still rising) with utility and energy prices breaking the back of the people.
The greatest achievement of Imran Khan being touted by his camp followers is his successful foreign policy which is nothing more than his managing to get loans from Saudi Arabia, UAE and China, which in turn have increased the debt burden and with it debt servicing. The confrontation with India has proved to be extremely expensive and forced a big rise in the defence budget at a time when the fiscal deficit is out of control. People are losing jobs by the day and economic distress is rising. After some grandstanding Pakistan is finally all set to approach the IMF which is likely to force a stiff structural adjustment programme on Pakistan—which in turn will worsen the economic crisis.
Suddenly, many of the members of the media corps (journalists who work as adjuncts of the military and take their line and their awards from the military spokesman’s office) who had been rooting for Imran Khan have started asking tough questions to retain a modicum of credibility. He has let loose his storm troopers in the social media space to troll his critics. The old media is meanwhile being pressured into compliance using the bait and threats of advertisements to keep them in line. Ironically, instead of helping the Imran Khan regime in painting a rosy picture, the muzzling of the media is leading to pressure building up in the system because it is finding no outlet.
The situation is ideal for the opposition parties. But they are in no position to exploit the situation partly because the main leaders of these parties are trying to save themselves from jail, and partly because they are trying to win an approval from the military before they take to the streets. In what is a classic game theory framework, the opposition parties are trying to maximise their individual welfare instead of cooperating to maximise their collective welfare. Meanwhile, the army is scratching its head on what to do to handle the situation. Having invested so much in Imran Khan and pushed the other parties against the wall, the military is for now left with no option but to stick with the man they selected. But for how long?
Even if the main opposition parties don’t take to the streets, the rising economic distress is going to create pressure from below. If that happens, the opposition parties will probably be left with no choice but to ride that wave. With the Khanate going kaput, it is going to be only a matter of time before the “khakis” will be left with no option but to intervene. It is of course another matter that the military’s “khakicracy” is really a kakistocracy.

After failed UNSC move, Imran Khan says 'ensuring resolution to Kashmir issue responsibility of this world body'

US President Donald Trump has already asked Pakistan PM Imran Khan to resolve the issue through bilateral dialogue.


A day after China-Pakistan initiative to rake up Kashmir at United Nations found no support at the United Nations Security Council Consultative (UNSCC) meet on Friday, a rattled Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on Saturday said he welcome UNSC discussions on Jammu & Kashmir.
"I welcome the UNSC meeting to discuss the serious situation in Jammu & Kashmir. It is for the first time in over 50 years that the world’s highest diplomatic forum has taken up this issue. There are 11 UNSC resolutions reiterating the Kashmiris right to self-determination."
However, even after US President Donald Trump asked Pakistan to resolve the issue through bilateral dialogue, Imran Khan once again tried to play his Kashmir propaganda saying, "And the UNSC meeting was a reaffirmation of these resolutions. Therefore addressing the suffering of the Kashmiri people and ensuring resolution of the dispute is the responsibility of this world body."
Apart from US, other nations including Russia, France have called that Kashmir issue should be resolved bilaterally.  
Meanwhile, addressing a presser at the UNSC, India's permanent envoy to United Nations, Syed Akbaruddin on Friday had already conveyed, "Article 370 is internal matter... these have no external ramifications."
Addressing a Pakistani reporter's query on when talks with Islamabad will take place, Akbaruddin said, "Using terror to push goals is not the way normal states should behave. Stop terror to begin talks."
Akbaruddin spoke to the media after the representatives of China and Pakistan had spoken and took questions unlike his counterparts. He took first three questions from Pakistani journalists and even went to them to shake hands in a gesture reflecting India's willingness to engage in a dialogue provided there was no push to terror.
Akbaruddin said that matters related to Article 370 of Indian Constitution "were entirely an internal matter of India".
Asked about India refusing dialogue with Pakistan, Akbaruddin said there are normal diplomatic ways of dealing with countries. "But using terror to try and push your goal is not the way that normal states behave. No democracy will acknowledge or accept talks when terror thrives. Stop terror, start talks," he said.
Russia, France and the US backed India at the consultations.
First Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia, Dmitry Polyanskiy said, "We will open-heartedly continue to engage with Islamabad and New Delhi in order to help both of them to come to terms and have good neighbourly ties on Kashmir on the basis of Simla Agreement of 1972 and Lahore declaration of 1999."

Kashmir off the table, Modi govt now wants revised ‘talking points’ with Pakistan




Cross-border terrorism is set to become single-point agenda between India and Pakistan as Modi govt looks to revise the terms of engagement.

With Kashmir now pulled off the negotiation table, the Narendra Modi government is planning to revise the “talking points” with Pakistan that may render the composite dialogue process redundant. The issue of cross-border terrorism is likely to become the single-point agenda between New Delhi and Islamabad.
The composite dialogue process was established between India and Pakistan by former prime ministers, I.K. Gujral and Nawaz Sharif, respectively, on the sidelines of the 1997 SAARC summit in Maldives.
It was the first time that the two sides agreed to discuss “all outstanding issues including Jammu and Kashmir” as part of the structured dialogue.
However, a senior government official told ThePrint that the “Kashmir chapter is now over”.
“The talking points will now have to be revised. Although there is no room for a dialogue at this end, India has to be seen as a statesman,” said the official on condition of anonymity.
India now plans to increasingly portray an image of a statesman in front of the world, as far as the South Asian region is concerned, that is keen on having a normal and stable relationship with its neighbour, the official added.

How Modi govt sees the composite dialogue

The composite dialogue process has been suspended several times in the past, but it underwent a complete transformation under the Modi government’s first tenure when both sides agreed to discuss terror and violence and delink the issue with talks.
The process was regularly reviewed between both sides until it was suspended in the aftermath of the 2008 Mumbai terror attack. It had been suspended on a couple of instances prior to that too, especially during the 1999 Kargil War, but the credibility of the process came under severe scrutiny after the Mumbai attack. In 2010, the process was resumed under a different nomenclature and it included new talking points such as counter terrorism.
Under the Modi government the composite dialogue transformed into what came to be known as ‘Comprehensive Bilateral Dialogue’. This was announced by former external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj at the Fifth Ministerial Conference of the Heart of Asia-Istanbul Process in Islamabad on 8-9 December, 2015.
However, in the wake of the September 2016 Uri attack, the Modi government said “terror and talks won’t go together”.
“The problem in India-Pakistan relations is not the absence of good talking points or dialogue mechanisms… Notwithstanding what new items are listed for dialogue by diplomats, the test of the relationship will remain the irreversible end of terrorism and walking away from viewing each other as enemies who must be outwitted and defeated at all costs,” said Husain Haqqani, former ambassador of Pakistan to the US.

Terror and talks

According to former foreign secretary Kanwal Sibal, the main talking point that India needs to sort out with Islamabad is terrorism, with particular reference to cross-border terrorism.
“At this time, talks are out of question. But at a later stage, India has to discuss terrorism with Pakistan, which remains the biggest unfinished agenda. Besides, agreement on nuclear sites also remains a crucial part of the composite dialogue,” said Sibal.
Unlike the previous dialogue process that had eight subjects, the comprehensive bilateral dialogue included over ten: Peace and security, confidence building measures, Jammu and Kashmir, Siachen, Sir Creek, Wullar Barrage/Tulbul Navigation Project, economic and commercial cooperation, counter-terrorism, narcotics control, humanitarian issues, people to people exchanges and religious tourism.
T.C.A. Raghavan, former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan, said while it is too early for both the nuclear-armed neighbours to have a dialogue, the issue of counter-terrorism will now rule the roost.
“As neighbours there are a number of issues that both the countries have to discuss. The issue of Kashmir is not over yet. The question of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) has to be settled.
“But Pakistan is clearly overreacting at the moment. We want a stable relationship with Pakistan,” Raghavan, director general of Indian Council of World Affairs (ICWA).
The real issue between both countries right now is whether they can overcome “mistrust”, said Haqqani, who is also director (South & Central Asia), Hudson Institute and author of Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military and Magnificent Delusions: Pakistan, the United States, and an Epic History of Misunderstanding.
“Terrorism has muddied the water since the 1980s but even before that, the 1965 war came right after the 1963 ministerial level talks on Kashmir and the 1971 war was not long after the Tashkent Declaration of 1966.
“The Simla Accord of 1972 lays the foundation for dealing with all issues, including Kashmir, bilaterally. It also calls upon India and Pakistan to end the propaganda that breeds hostility,” added Haqqani.
Before the Kashmir issue sprang up earlier this month, the Imran Khan government had urged India for a dialogue on many occasions, even after the Balakot air strikes. However, with the scrapping of Jammu and Kashmir’s special status, Islamabad has refused to engage with for a dialogue.
On Friday, post the UN Security Council closed-door meeting on the Kashmir issue, Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said “there is no question of a dialogue with India” after its Kashmir move.

US Cuts $440 Million Financial Aid To Pakistan: Report

The US apprised Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan about its decision to cut aid three weeks before his planned visit to Washington.
 The United States slashed the aid to Pakistan by nearly $440 million, bringing down its commitment to just $4.1 billion.
The aid was disbursed under Pakistan Enhanced Partnership Agreement (PEPA) 2010, reported Express Tribune.
The US apprised Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan about its decision to cut aid three weeks before his planned visit to Washington.
Notably, the PEPA was signed in September 2010 to make operational the Kerry Lugar Berman (KLB) Act that was passed by the US Congress in October 2009 to disburse $7.5 billion to Pakistan over a period of 5 years.
Earlier the aid under the KLB stood at nearly $4.5 billion. Following the cut, the aid will come down to $4.1 billion.
Last year in September, the United States'' military cancelled the financial aid worth $300 million to Pakistan due to the growing concerns regarding Islamabad's failure to tackle terrorism.
In January that year, Pentagon had cut $1 billion worth financial aid to Pakistan, with Defense Secretary James Mattis and other officials citing Islamabad's failure to crack down on the Haqqani terror outfit as the reason behind it, Fox News reported.
During his meeting with Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, last month, US President Donald Trump strongly criticised Islamabad for its behaviour which led to the cancellation of US aid amounting to $1.3 billion to the country.
"We were paying $1.3 billion to Pakistan as aid, for many years. The problem was...Pakistan was not doing anything for us. They were really subversive. They were going against us. I ended that about a year and a half ago, the $1.3 billion (aid)," Donald Trump said during his meeting with Imran Khan.

#Video - Bilawal Bhutto condemns Kuchlak blast

Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Friday strongly condemned the Quetta blast and expressed grief over the loss of precious lives, ARY News reported. 

The PPP leader, in a statement, sympathized with bereaved families and prayed for the departed souls and early recovery of the injured.
“Implementation on National Action Plan (NAP) is necessary in order to eliminate the mindset of extremism,” said PPP chairman in a statement.
Earlier in the day, Prime Minister Imran Khan strongly condemned the terrorist attack in Quetta’s mosque during Friday prayers that left at least five people martyred and 15 others injured.
At least five people were martyred and 15 injured in a bomb blast during Friday prayers in the provincial capital of Balochistan.
Rescue sources said the explosion took place in a Madrasa of Kuchlak town of Quetta during Zuhr prayers. Five people were reported to be dead and around 15 sustained injuries in the blast.
The injured are being shifted to Mufti Mehmood hospital.
As per sources, the explosive was placed beneath the carpet of Madrasa which was set off during Friday prayers.
Rescue teams and security forces have reached the site of the incident.